Which is the newest of KL3 and KKA and how can you tell? Which one should I use?
KL3 is the newest which I use. Which one should you use? Well which ever one you have the best luck with, varies with some folks but I'm happy with KL3 based ROM I use.
its in alphanumeric order. higher letter/number after the first K means newer.
ie. i was on KJ4. KKA has a K instead of the J, therefore is newer. KL3 has the L instead of the J/K, hence is newer. as for the last digit, higher number is newer. letter > number, ie. KKA > KK9 from what i can gather.
I don't notice any difference between KKA and KL3, many people think KL3 is smoother but my KKA right now is as smoot as my previous KL3 where some people where having issues with market app.
Where to find KL3?
TNx
Look in the development forum for different roms. I started off with stock kka, which was overall fine but a bit laggy. Then flashed kl3 rom which had some improvement, but the biggest improvement was abyss 2.3 kernel which allowed overclock. So at 1.6Ghz its really nice and responsive.
Kl3 has a more receptive modem for wifi and 3g I get better signal with the included modem. It draws a little more power than kka
It can cause market issues for a small fraction of users however I find this to be stable with good battery life
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Do you have a link for kl3?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
dzontra11 said:
Do you have a link for kl3?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be just look in dev section
or
Deodexed version http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1393979
Stock http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1389693
Related
Hi guys,
Just a quick simple question.
I would like to get some suggestions on what is the most stable (idiot proof) STOCK FIRMWARE people has been using?
I am not going to root so info is much appreciated.
Cheers
If its ur frst flash then jvr wud be good... The latest bieng jvt... Sme ppl are facing wifi issues in jvs and jvt...
Yes this is the first on my i9000.
I ll give it a try
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
sadly all the stock firmwares have some small but irritating issues associated with them: as the firmwares develop iteratively, Samsung appears to keep experimenting with options and fixes, so most stock firmwares remain two steps forward and one step back from the last version -- some have more problems that others.
JVR has been the most successful (stable and official release), but in stock form it still had (has) some issues, which are usually effectively addressed by a custom rom or kernel or a different modem (depending on what issue vexes your phone).
JVT has now got a stable custom rom and kernel option also.
Cheers for the reply.
You mentioned jvt custom stable version.which one is this one?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
JVT
here is the link of the thread...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1289875
and here is the link of jvt... its there in the upper link too...
http://www.multiupload.com/474JS6Q0IC
Hi there,
Which of the STOCK Samsung I9000 rom do you think is the best, and why?
Stability, Battery usage, over all experience regarding the quality in the rom.
xwjsd froyo rom. Old but much less bugs than the recent gb roms. To be honest I flashed back to it and I am sticking to it unless samsung comes out with a gb release without the stupid.nasty bugs they are plagued with.
Sent from my GT-I9000T using xda premium
JW1 is probably the best. Because it feels smoother/faster in general usage compared to previous roms. And no real issues what I know of.
xxJVU is also good but im having some small problems with the modem.. sometimes It doesnt switch between 3g/h/edge when it should. Ill probably flash JVT modem to solve this.
ZSJPK or any other froyo 2.2.1 that was released after March 2011.
Is there any difference between XXLPY & XXLQ2 ?
Is XXLQ2 better than XXLPY ?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
don't know about technical details, but on my device LQ2 seems to have much better battery life than LPY, in fact on LPY battery consumption was so unstable i went back to GB for a while
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Just wanted to know is there a stable Stock ICS rom available for the SGN in India ?
I'm running on Gb and badly want to switch to ICS. PLease do let me know
rohitanooj said:
Just wanted to know is there a stable Stock ICS rom available for the SGN in India ?
I'm running on Gb and badly want to switch to ICS. PLease do let me know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dr Ketan's thread in development section has list of all the ROMs
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Yeah , thanks.
Just wanted to make sure if it's stable for me to update. So you'd advise me to update to ICS ?
rohitanooj said:
Yeah , thanks.
Just wanted to make sure if it's stable for me to update. So you'd advise me to update to ICS ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have the eMMc brick bug if you wipe data or factory reset...unless you use a custom kernel like franco or speedmod.
I have found myself getting more wakelocks with LQ2 , multipdp is taking up way more juice.
Changed the radio to a newer one and made no difference.
Only thing I have noticed is that I don't get pixel salad / garbled screen in LQ2 which I did in LPY now and then. Seems more stable to me.
rohitanooj said:
Yeah , thanks.
Just wanted to make sure if it's stable for me to update. So you'd advise me to update to ICS ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Generally yes, after initial disappointment with LPY, i find the LQ2 with Franco kernel quite satisfactory (no revelations though), so I'm not going back to GB,
or you may want to wait for Samsung to release brick-free update - reportedly they're working on it (ETA unknown),
or wait for stable release of CM9, which should provide the best Android-experience ever
Thanks a lot !
p107r0 said:
Generally yes, after initial disappointment with LPY, i find the LQ2 with Franco kernel quite satisfactory (no revelations though), so I'm not going back to GB,
or you may want to wait for Samsung to release brick-free update - reportedly they're working on it (ETA unknown),
or wait for stable release of CM9, which should provide the best Android-experience ever
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you were disapointed by LPY? Im running it and it works just fine.
Does XXLQ2 has better battery life than LPY?
tyraelasd said:
Why you were disapointed by LPY? Im running it and it works just fine.
Does XXLQ2 has better battery life than LPY?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LPY worked ok, only battery consumption was much higher than on GB, and I could not find any way to make it behave. LQ2 -on my device - seems to have it solved (battery current usage in standby mode - with data off - below 10mA)
My Note is my daily driver and with LPY runs very good but battety life very poor after flash LQ2 my device runs more smooth and also battery life is better
Good day everyone. I just want to ask you guys, especially those who are using stock roms, which do you prefer, stock ics or stock gb? I'm coming from PA by Utacka and I pretty much used custom roms from the start so i never actually used stock.
Please provide a reason as to why. I just want to have a stable rom while waiting for the official jelly bean update.
Thank you everyone.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
there is no as such reasons to be on a particular ROM.. its each and everyones taste that keep them stuck to a particular rom,
as far as stock is concerned stock ICS rooted with a hydracore kernel works best for me
I would compare GB to windows XP. Sure it was good back in the day, but it's had it's run now and time to stay current. ICS has been released for a good while now and should have had all the bugs ironed out. Little things like the improved task switching (previews over icons), and swipe to dismiss notifications, while small differences make for a better experience over all.
A better kernal like hydracore to improve battery life and a stock ICS (or maybe back to rocketrom) would be what i would go back to if i was so inclined (i'm on utacka's PA at the moment too)
defecat0r said:
I would compare GB to windows XP. Sure it was good back in the day, but it's had it's run now and time to stay current. ICS has been released for a good while now and should have had all the bugs ironed out. Little things like the improved task switching (previews over icons), and swipe to dismiss notifications, while small differences make for a better experience over all.
A better kernal like hydracore to improve battery life and a stock ICS (or maybe back to rocketrom) would be what i would go back to if i was so inclined (i'm on utacka's PA at the moment too)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the answer. My only intention is to have a pretty reliable phone so I can use my phone when it really counts. I hate that when I have to do something really important, I will encounter freezes or out of memory error that prevents me to actually multitask.
I haven't tried rocketrom but I am willing to try that. My only fear is if it will lag after few days of use. My boss' phone which is sgs2 would go for days or months without a reboot and he is on stock gb. He doesn't know anything about smartphones in general so he thinks he is using a regular phone, and he is pretty happy about the phone's performance. I just want the same experience.
Thank you.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
ICS 4.0.4 without hesitation especially with interducing of safe kernel
Flash stock ICS 4.0.4 via PC Odin (the new one like xxlrt or ddlr9) then flash safe stock kernel like PhilZ kernel for your new rom from (also via odin or cwm): http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901191
And thats it!! Full stock, very smooth (compared with older 4.0.4), and most important it is perfectly stable, and everything works.
I only aded a call recording mode beacause I realy need it.
Hope that help!
ICS 4.0.4 and HydraCore
djoni_gitara said:
Flash stock ICS 4.0.4 via PC Odin (the new one like xxlrt or ddlr9) then flash safe stock kernel like PhilZ kernel for your new rom from (also via odin or cwm): http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901191
And thats it!! Full stock, very smooth (compared with older 4.0.4), and most important it is perfectly stable, and everything works.
I only aded a call recording mode beacause I realy need it.
Hope that help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay I'll look into that. Someone suggested about Rocketrom, do you think that Rocketrom could perhaps be more stable and faster than fully stock ( except kernel maybe) xxlrt or ddlr9, and do everything work on that? Files are too large for touchwiz roms so i want to know more about different types of rom before doing some flashing. I won't have so much time this coming months so I really want a reliable phone. Thanks a lot.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
May be cleanote... It's actually the stock with all bloatware removed
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
noneym86 said:
Okay I'll look into that. Someone suggested about Rocketrom, do you think that Rocketrom could perhaps be more stable and faster than fully stock ( except kernel maybe) xxlrt or ddlr9, and do everything work on that? Files are too large for touchwiz roms so i want to know more about different types of rom before doing some flashing. I won't have so much time this coming months so I really want a reliable phone. Thanks a lot.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont want complaining on certain rom, but if you ask i will say my opinion on rocketrom. It is a good and stable rom, i have used it with hydracore kernel and dont find any problems with in about 2-3 weeks of use. But it is based on xxlrq which i found a bit laggy for me (the same story is for completly stock xxlrq). I dont know which is a difernce in xxlrq compared to xxlrt (some says the diference is only in kernel but i dont know).
So i was tired of flashing and stuff and decided to go on completly stock, picked up a latest xxlrt and whoaa, great. The reason why i am on lrt because my note is from german, i think that same story is for indian lr6 and lr9.
Then the story begins:
-Flashed stock GB xxlc1 via pc odin
-full wipe
-flash stock ics 4.0.4. xxlrt via pc odin
-root (dr.ketans guide) - only because of callrecord mod
-first flashed hydracore 4.3std kernel (also great kernel) and then philZ realesed his stock, emmc bug free kernel, so i flashed it.
Now used only a PhilZ kernel because it is completly stock with removed emmc brick bug. And for stock xxlrt rom it is perfect combination for me (just choose right kernel for your rom)
-Added only call recording mode
-settings > application > unninstalling aplications which i dont use ; > ALL > disabling (readers, music, social hub, etc...)
-And thats it!
Perfectly stable, smooth with great battery life, without any problem, FC or else. Without reboot for about 3 days (reason flashed Philz kernel 23.09)
Finally happy with my note :victory:
Hope that helped
Which firmware is better for smoth gaming,Android 2.3.3 or 2.3.6?Is battery always drain on 2.3.3?
Uhm. Usually I would point these kinds of questions to my thread in my signature but this is between different GB versions...
2.3.6 was pretty stable as far as I remember for games and the like. Never had 2.3.3 so I'm not entirely sure sorry.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
2.3.6
Agree: 2.3.6
2.3.6
2.3.6. But I prefer 4.4
upgrade !
nemanja96 said:
Which firmware is better for smoth gaming,Android 2.3.3 or 2.3.6?Is battery always drain on 2.3.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Upgrade to 4.4 it is best!
nemanja96 said:
Which firmware is better for smoth gaming,Android 2.3.3 or 2.3.6?Is battery always drain on 2.3.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.3.6
I have 2.3.6
Its definitely better.
But being heavy load successors jb dint catch me
Bt kitkat...oh man its awesome
Light on weight nd ram
Buying motoG for that only.
Sent from my GT-S6102 using xda app-developers app
nemanja96 said:
Which firmware is better for smoth gaming,Android 2.3.3 or 2.3.6?Is battery always drain on 2.3.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you have a choice between 2.3.3 and 2.3.6 why would you not go for the higher and updated version? if you can find a 2.3.7 rom that would be even better cyanogenmod 7.2 uses 2.3.7
You can try this rom:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1388342
Best GB ROM
Until 2 weeks ago I also used 2.3.6 on my Galaxy S plus. A year ago, 2.3.3.
2.3.6 was faster, but the more I used it the more curious was the behavior.
Sometimes it was not possible to quickly make a call. When I pressed the green telephone receiver icon, nothing happened. Only after about 30 seconds, the dial image was displayed and I could make calls.
I think it was due to modern apps, with simply overstrained the gingerbread system....
Currently I use the ADC team CyanogenMod 11.0 release and am very happy with it.