Well I'm wondering what are differences between tw kernels and aosp kernels because I thought the kernels Works the same no matter the ui.. What matters its the OS huh? I know there's some framework related stuff in tw but still why does this affect the kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Related
Question is in the title, with the leaks out there, is there any pure ICS for the Note like there is for the i9000 and i9100?
I'm not a fan of the reskins I've seen, running Darky 3.3 ICS themed atm :x
CM9 is about as "pure" as you can get.
Sent from my SPH-P100 using xda premium
If you install cm9, then flash kernel from one of the leaks, would thhat fix the camera issue?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Tore Birgisson said:
If you install cm9, then flash kernel from one of the leaks, would thhat fix the camera issue?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no it wouldnt
Sent from my GT-N7000
Would replacing the current CM9 Camera drivers with the ones from the leak work?
Is it as simple as replacing the .so files?
This one seems to be a pure AOSP, but it has issues of its own (all early ICS releases do).
Hey Guys
So Listen I Have The CM9 Paranoidandroid V0.4 And I Started Hearing About The Official ICS Coming From Samsung The Official So What Do You Think Should I Switch To The Stock And Try The Samsung Firmware Or Should I Stay On Paranoidandroid Which Is Better I Cant Say Please Help Me
Cm9 is ics more like intended, paranoid is same with tweaksettings ability.
Stock is how Samsung intended it. Which means looks practically as previous version roms lol
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Its basically of your choice many peoples love touhwiz and more hate it but stock roms are very stable than any other rom
Well in touchwiz you can use:
1.full spen functionality
2.wifi direct
3.and some minor things
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Just get urself outta this cm9ahit buddy..dunno y people go for it...it's too risky ****...and when u have really nice stock based roms like crash ics and chekrom gb why go for cm9??bwsides cm9 has microphone bug and paranoid is notorious for nonfunctionality of s pen..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
I know of the problems and i know the risks but since the official ics is released for GNOTE i thought which is better my friend said that paranoid is faster , im aware off the mic and s pen problem but thanks anyway
You think i should try the official ??
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Warnahly said:
I know of the problems and i know the risks but since the official ics is released for GNOTE i thought which is better my friend said that paranoid is faster , im aware off the mic and s pen problem but thanks anyway
You think i should try the official ??
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you like touchwizz, then go for stock, that's the only real benefit. There are a lot of problems with stock ics, superbrick bug that could damage your device, wifi problems, general degradation over time.
CM roms including paranoid are as ics was meant to be and very stable. I have no idea what the guy above means by risks? There aren't any, it's safer than stock.
Like I say it comes down to touchwizz vs stock whichever you prefer.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
dratif said:
Just get urself outta this cm9ahit buddy..dunno y people go for it...it's too risky ****...and when u have really nice stock based roms like crash ics and chekrom gb why go for cm9??bwsides cm9 has microphone bug and paranoid is notorious for nonfunctionality of s pen..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
SpyderTracks said:
If you like touchwizz, then go for stock, that's the only real benefit. There are a lot of problems with stock ics, superbrick bug that could damage your device, wifi problems, general degradation over time.
CM roms including paranoid are as ics was meant to be and very stable. I have no idea what the guy above means by risks? There aren't any, it's safer than stock.
Like I say it comes down to touchwizz vs stock whichever you prefer.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks for the info it really helped dude
I've looked it up but found nothing relevant. So...
What's the difference between the different kernels available for ace? For example, firekerneloc vs blackhawkoc or cf-root. Where can i find the info on whether they support swap partition an stuff like that?
Thnx
elmusafir said:
I've looked it up but found nothing relevant. So...
What's the difference between the different kernels available for ace? For example, firekerneloc vs blackhawkoc or cf-root. Where can i find the info on whether they support swap partition an stuff like that?
Thnx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fire kernel has support and has new sources. About the infos I think you can find it in feature list in the thread or just try it.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
abhibnl said:
Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank for the clarification, I've been looking for a kernel that gives me BLN and works with a stock rom, but I'm a bit confused some roms come with a ton of features and I dont know if they will work for a normal rom (must of th ones I've read say it works for CMX or TWX etc but none mention stock roms)!
I use battery extender as kernel for stock rom and is working great.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
So, advantages?
abhibnl said:
Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay; so I am on Battery Extender (1.4, I believe), using S'perience ROM (based on CM7), what advantages, if any, would FirekernelOC or BlackhawkOC give me in terms of performance or battery life?
Another thing: I've seen both FirekernelOC and BlackhawkOC being used in different versions of the same ROM (take Democracy, for instance), what is the difference between the two?
thnx
elmusafir
elmusafir said:
Okay; so I am on Battery Extender (1.4, I believe), using S'perience ROM (based on CM7), what advantages, if any, would FirekernelOC or BlackhawkOC give me in terms of performance or battery life?
Another thing: I've seen both FirekernelOC and BlackhawkOC being used in different versions of the same ROM (take Democracy, for instance), what is the difference between the two?
thnx
elmusafir
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you use Battery Extender kernel on a CM7 based ROM?
Battery Extender is for Stock ROM
I've 2.3.6 Stock UBKPL ... I want to install the battery extender 1.5 ... also I want to activate the swap, but I don't know if using swap reduces performance of the battery ... ???
Enviado desde mi GT-S5830L usando Tapatalk 2
davidgmateo said:
I've 2.3.6 Stock UBKPL ... I want to install the battery extender 1.5 ... also I want to activate the swap, but I don't know if using swap reduces performance of the battery ... ???
Enviado desde mi GT-S5830L usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It reduces performance of SD Card.
KcLKcL said:
Why do you use Battery Extender kernel on a CM7 based ROM?
Battery Extender is for Stock ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly my point. Where can I get all these differences? I just read lots of opinions about these kernels but can find no precise information about them. Where can read about them? Forums are a mess and the search function becomes almost useless when you try to refine search to kernel related posts.
S Perience ROM? Its a stock based ROM!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
ROMFlasherAce said:
S Perience ROM? Its a stock based ROM!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. It isn't cm based.
Tapatalk 2 @Samsung Galaxy Ace
As far as i know, there aren't any !
but if my information is antique, kindly tell me what Custom ROMs Do.
I want to try Custom ROMs but i need the S PEN and use it so i have to be sure before trying.
thanks !
Most if not all roms support the spen, aosp roms such as cm or pa support it aswell however the spen apps provided by samsung wont be there. You can choose to get other apps to replace them, such as note, papyrus and such. Good luck.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
do ROMS like Paranoidandroid, omega or cinogynemod support it??
Yes they do.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
thanks bro
Yes, lately, AOSP/AOKP based ROM do supported S-Pen.
Is there a possibility or have someone tried to create an aosp jb?Like 4.1.2?Because i like aosp much more from other type of roms and i think aosp have better performance.Also i think it will be something different from other jb roms where are out there.So can someone answer?
Any?
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app