Related
I tried the latest build of CM7 done by the Atrix Dev Team and it is awesome. Very reliable, fully functional, etc. I figured I'd give a whirl to compiling the real ICS version to see what that was like.
CM9 build system with the appropriate Atrix Dev Team repos in place actually spit out a working ROM. There are a number of issues aside from the general preview state of CM9. I figured I would share them in case anyone else was as curious as me. Apparently, the internal atrix dev teams are well beyond these issues already, so kudos.
Probably related to CM/atrix specific stuff
- Camera and finger print sensor don't work
- Launcher crashes pretty often
- Some openGL demos don't seem to work right (or at all)
- No mounting the SD as USB storage
Probably related to the specific gapps package I used.
- Maps crashes after 3 seconds (signal 11 - native code crash)
- Maps wants to update, but it can't (sharedId conflict if you actually remove maps)
- Earth won't run (missing the earthmobile library)
- Google Voice Search bombs (signal 4 - illegal instruction - currently suspecting the native packages might have some NEON instructions that the atrix cpu doesnt support)
- Calendar will not sync for google or exchange. App loads, but the sync service is failing
- Lots of null pointer exceptions for the NFC stuff in the log.
Anyway, this is just a build of the code that's out there, nothing special done by me. It might be useful for a dev phone or something but not for use on a real day-to-day device. Obviously it doesn't have the google apps embedded in it.
http://www.multiupload.com/XT9QPPQYF1 thanks xploited for uploading
md5: 670068584eb94bf1d660c0450815ad0d
Personally, I had trouble going back to CM7 afterwards, my clockwordmod backups were screwed up (bad boot.img? cross-linked files on the SD card) and I had a very hard time getting back to the good ole working state. Ultimately, I had to restore the partial backup and then reflash the CM7 image + gapps.
So, if you were curious what building a random repo on the web and installing it on your phone would do, then feel free to try and lose all of your data. There are no updates/support for this, etc. It's just a curiosity... what is the state of this stuff right now?
BTW... I am back on CM7/Atrix now which is AWESOME!!!!
Source Code Links:
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android
https://github.com/Atrix-Dev-Team/android_device_motorola_olympus
Not sure how the dev team would react to this ..we do not want any bricked phones because of this ..there maybe some experimental dangerous code in there in those sources as of now ..not sure though
Hmm... figured since I spent quite awhile getting a build set up, it might be worth sharing. I am happy to take down if it is inappropriate.
Well I am not the best person to answer that ...but yeah thanks for your work.
Eh, I wouldn't be mad about it, but I think it needs more caution. I would just wait. As you say, it kindof screwed with a lot and wasn't very usable, so why flash it? Maybe ok for someone who wants to look at the code, but I wouldn't flash it.
Awesome news man. Thanks for being a lab rat and giving us an update.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Not so much take it down as change the title of the post.
the current internal atrix-dev-team cm9 is way further ahead of this, we have some different patches. this is missleqading as it makes it sound official and is not.
Could you please change the tittle to [KANG] CM9 Test Build by "your name"
and please link to the sources, as is proper practice for open source projects
thank you
samcripp said:
Not so much take it down as change the title of the post.
the current internal atrix-dev-team cm9 is way further ahead of this, we have some different patches. this is missleqading as it makes it sound official and is not.
Could you please change the tittle to [KANG] CM9 Test Build by "your name"
and please link to the sources, as is proper practice for open source projects
thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and I guess you guys deserve a Xmas break now ...
It's nice to see that! Thanks for your hard work.
I'm looking forward to the CM9
Thank you for this.
!
Anyways, Just out of curiosity... where can you find the official Atrix Dev team's CM9?
The one been worked on by turl is with him, that is not for public release.
Dont forget to tell him merry xmas!
I always forget what kang means.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
wrldsuksgo2mars said:
I tried the latest build of CM7 done by the Atrix Dev Team and it is awesome. Very reliable, fully functional, etc. I figured I'd give a whirl to compiling the real ICS version to see what that was like.
CM9 build system with the appropriate Atrix Dev Team repos in place actually spit out a working ROM. There are a number of issues aside from the general preview state of CM9. I figured I would share them in case anyone else was as curious as me. Apparently, the internal atrix dev teams are well beyond these issues already, so kudos.
Probably related to CM/atrix specific stuff
- Camera and finger print sensor don't work
- Launcher crashes pretty often
- Some openGL demos don't seem to work right (or at all)
- No mounting the SD as USB storage
Probably related to the specific gapps package I used.
- Maps crashes after 3 seconds (signal 11 - native code crash)
- Maps wants to update, but it can't (sharedId conflict if you actually remove maps)
- Earth won't run (missing the earthmobile library)
- Google Voice Search bombs (signal 4 - illegal instruction - currently suspecting the native packages might have some NEON instructions that the atrix cpu doesnt support)
- Calendar will not sync for google or exchange. App loads, but the sync service is failing
- Lots of null pointer exceptions for the NFC stuff in the log.
Anyway, this is just a build of the code that's out there, nothing special done by me. It might be useful for a dev phone or something but not for use on a real day-to-day device. Obviously it doesn't have the google apps embedded in it.
http://goo.gl/39NnA
Personally, I had trouble going back to CM7 afterwards, my clockwordmod backups were screwed up (bad boot.img? cross-linked files on the SD card) and I had a very hard time getting back to the good ole working state. Ultimately, I had to restore the partial backup and then reflash the CM7 image + gapps.
So, if you were curious what building a random repo on the web and installing it on your phone would do, then feel free to try and lose all of your data. There are no updates/support for this, etc. It's just a curiosity... what is the state of this stuff right now?
BTW... I am back on CM7/Atrix now which is AWESOME!!!!
Source Code Links:
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android
https://github.com/Atrix-Dev-Team/android_device_motorola_olympus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thinks for your works,
Come from Chinese thinks!
i shall say this.. if this is behind where the dev team actually is...things are looking good! and btw.. i believe fruitcaker maker works. installed and is now creating;]
edit: yep. it does.
Thanks man very very good work android congratulations for share work whith comunity
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
it looks very nice but id needs a bit more work to be a experimental daily driver.
ps: to solve the corrupt backup problem just copy the files to your computer before flashing and copy to your phone before restoring.
good luck!
where can I get google apps for this rom? Tryed gapps for CM7 from CM wiki - fail, setup wizard crashes.
try the one on this link
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/11854-romcm9-encounterics-x-beta-2-with-working-radio-401/
good luck!
---------- Post added at 07:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:47 AM ----------
ilya11g said:
where can I get google apps for this rom? Tryed gapps for CM7 from CM wiki - fail, setup wizard crashes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try the one on this link
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/11854-rom...ing-radio-401/
good luck!
For a preview build it looks pretty nice. Surprisingly stable for what it is. Definitely keeping an eye on this, especially since the code is out there to make DIY kangs with.
samcripp said:
The one been worked on by turl is with him, that is not for public release.
Dont forget to tell him merry xmas!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Random SamCripp memory....
"We're rapping them, we're rapping them!!!"
Sorry, guess you had to be there.... aahhh memories... nevermind, sorry for the off topic post.
Thanks though for the effort of getting this ported btw.
Hi,
Here is CM-11 (Android 4.4.4) for the kindle fire hdx 7" (THOR). You need a rooted hdx 7" (Thor) device with a firmware < 3.2.4 (3.2.3.2 ideally) and a signed recovery.
Todo
Bluetooth not working
Wifi won't correctly load when disabled at boot, a reboot is required
Minimal headphone volume too loud -> fixed
Incorrect color format in some scenario's ? (YouTube) -> fixed
Changelogs/Downloads
cm-11-20150226-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
Updated to amazon 4.5.3 binaries
Fully disable radio for now (thanks Andy-Voigt)
Fix twrp fstab (enabling twrp was breaking system rom to boot)
CM sources updated to 20150226
cm-11-20150219-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
CM sources updated to 20150219
cm-11-20150219-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
fix minimal video/media volume too high (youtube...)
switch back to tablet build
CM sources updated to 20150110
cm-11-20150108-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
Fix thermal engine (should give better battery life and performances)
Fix a lot of proprietary services (proprietary logs, acdb-loader, ril loading ...)
Set media volume steps to 100 instead 15 (allow finer volume control essentially for jack output)
Lowered minimal screen brightness
CM sources updated to 20150108
cm-11-20150107-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
Build without "hacks" (add Cuber signing and custom updater-script generation)
CM sources updated to 20150107
Enable telephony (will probably not work)
cm-11-20150101-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
use patched boot/recovery, thanks to @vortox
fix wrong color format ! (major bug resolved)
switch to kernel sources
cm-11-20141218-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
minors fixes
cm-11-20141217-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
fix wifi not reloading
fix overlay/rotation screen tearing
cm-11-20141216-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
updated binaries to amz 4.5.2
properly use precompiled kernel and headers (amz 4.5.2)
fix minimal audio volume too high
add safestrap compatibility
Sources
android_device_amazon_thor
android_device_amazon_hdx-common
hardware_qcom_display-caf-hdx
hardware_qcom_audio-caf-hdx
hardware_qcom_media-caf-hdx
I'm sure the community here respects all of the work that you do. My post in the other thread was not intended to "get you in trouble". There are a set of rules that every user has to follow, regardless of their contributions to the community. That being said, when I was a newer member, I accidentally broke the rules a couple of times (nothing major) and didn't want the same to happen to someone else. (I never contacted @Divine_Madcat about your other thread, in case you were thinking I did.)
r3pwn said:
I'm sure the community here respects all of the work that you do. My post in the other thread was not intended to "get you in trouble". There are a set of rules that every user has to follow, regardless of their contributions to the community. That being said, when I was a newer member, I accidentally broke the rules a couple of times (nothing major) and didn't want the same to happen to someone else. (I never contacted @Divine_Madcat about your other thread, in case you were thinking I did.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep i was tinking to that... so I'm also sorry. The thing is i spent a lot, lot of time on this port, and Divine_Madcat didn't even give me the time to update the first thread with the needed files/informations and ignore my pm which was an offense to me. Well i have to complies to the rules too but was a little chocked on how the thread got mad. Well, let's hope it won't be the same here. So that said i have no problem with you !
Cpasjuste said:
Yep i was tinking to that... so I'm also sorry. The thing is i spent a lot, lot of time on this port, and Divine_Madcat didn't even give me the time to update the first thread with the needed files/informations and ignore my pm which was an offense to me. Well i have to complies to the rules too but was a little chocked on how the thread got mad. Well, let's hope it won't be the same here. So that said i have no problem with you !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While i am sorry you are upset, it was not a slight at you at all. While i do try to keep an eye on XDA while at work, my job does come first and foremost, and i was unable to handle anything here yesterday (what can i say, 12 hour work days suck). As it was, i have literally nothing against you; to be frank, the report on the thread was the first i had even seen.
From my perspective, we had a placeholder thread, which is not allowed, so it was closed. I fully intended to reopen it, but gave my reasons above...
Anyway, i do wish you luck, and i really dont have any ill will to you...
So....
Do we have unlocked bootloader or a root exploit for amazon firmware 4.5.2 soon? And do you have plan to release another for Apollo?
Thanks
tuanda82 said:
So....
Do we have unlocked bootloader or a root exploit for amazon firmware 4.5.2 soon? And do you have plan to release another for Apollo?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody knows. But there are a few people working on "unlocks" (at least booting an unsigned kernel). Maybe also jcase releases his unlock (which I doubt because of legal issues).
Hi!
I have rooted Kindle Thor. How do I install this nice piece of software?
Like the Nexus rom? Currently I am on 3.2.7...
Thanks
URBANsUNITED
URBANsUNITED said:
Hi!
I have rooted Kindle Thor. How do I install this nice piece of software?
Like the Nexus rom? Currently I am on 3.2.7...
Thanks
URBANsUNITED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to be on 4.5.2 and rooted.
cyablo said:
You need to be on 4.5.2 and rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mmmmmhhh
Than this rom is basically usless
Who has a 4.5.2 Base and Rooted??? I would do it if I'll get the tools, no fear of a brick
Too bad. But Nevertheless Many thanks for the work and effort!
URBANsUNITED said:
Mmmmmhhh
Than this rom is basically usless
Who has a 4.5.2 Base and Rooted??? I would do it if I'll get the tools, no fear of a brick
Too bad. But Nevertheless Many thanks for the work and effort!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a few Users which do have an unlocked Bootloader, this Rom is only for these Users, as stated in the first Post.
I decided to make the rom available in case i loose interest in this device (or if i ever die soon). This way when (if) a root exploit is available then you'll be ready to use it.
Ok... So if there IS a possibility to unlock the actual fireos, please give some hints, instead of publishings Roms that one or two users can install, the rest is completely helpless...
Sent from my Nexus HDX 7 using XDA Free mobile app
openWeb74 said:
Ok... So if there IS a possibility to unlock the actual fireos, please give some hints, instead of publishings Roms that one or two users can install, the rest is completely helpless...
Sent from my Nexus HDX 7 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sharing hundreds of hours of work is helpless/useless for you ?
You know what ? I actually spent the whole day on porting cm-10 to current exploitable kernel for YOU :/
Everybody chill , @openWeb74, i see your point @Cpasjuste , first let me thank you for all your work, I'm pretty sure its a great Rom!
What openweb said was that maybe we should concentrate our efforts in unlocking the bootloader so even greater support can come.
Unfortunately we, the rest of us common mortals (with locked bootloaders) cannot use it.
As you said, this would work if somebody would release the bootloader-unlock , so lets play the waiting game...
The thing is I'm a common mortal like you :/ Like its said on first post, unfortunately, I do not have the tools nor the knowledge to reproduce the unlock, so I share what I can.
I really have to say sorry, if you dont know how to reproduce the hack... Mea culpa. It sounded like the hack is known, but cant be made public because of copyright issues or something like that... Then we have to wait. Nothing is secure when the right person gets a hdx... I have to say, that my actual hdx was rooted with towelroot, even easier than the nexus (less button combinations ) so i didnt expect amazon to be such a **** with newer firmwares.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Free mobile app
Cpasjuste said:
The thing is I'm a common mortal like you :/ Like its said on first post, unfortunately, I do not have the tools nor the knowledge to reproduce the unlock, so I share what I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for nagging you about it, but — genuinely asking — how did you do it on your device in the first place?
dear Cpasjuste, thanks for your great work, and how to install this Rom ? I am newbie, so..
OK... So you are a newbie in reading too?
Sent from my Nexus HDX 7 using XDA Free mobile app
I may eventually move to another tablet as I'm loosing interest in this device (because cm is working fine [emoji14]). Would someone be interested to get my device (not for free )?
Since this thread is no longer just about me trying to get lollipop running on this phone (I AM still doing that though) I decided to 'rebrand' it as a general development thread for OSA. What's OSA? It stands for Only Some Android...ok so whats that? A team name I came up with to make myself feel more important (btw we're always looking for contributors).
So instead of focusing on just lollipop I will be discussing pretty much anything and everything I am doing in regards to the Desire 510.
Original Post Below:
Hi all, I am currently working on getting lollipop working on the Desire 510. So far I had a successful compile of LiquidSmooth 5.1.1 a couple nights ago but not a successful boot. I am currently 97% done syncing the CyanogenMod 12.1 sources (5.1.1 r3) and am now using the omni twrp sources to ensure a higher compatibility for the recovery, I am hoping for a successful boot soon.
I have the virgin mobile cdma model of the device and that's what I will be targeting although I will do my best to make sure the device tree is universal. If anyone has any insight or advice I am all ears.
I am going to use this thread as a development thread until I get the required 10 posts and I get a booting rom.
OnlySomeDood said:
Hi all, I am currently working on getting lollipop working on the Desire 510. So far I had a successful compile of LiquidSmooth 5.1.1 a couple nights ago but not a successful boot. I am currently 97% done syncing the CyanogenMod 12.1 sources (5.1.1 r3) and am now using the omni twrp sources to ensure a higher compatibility for the recovery, I am hoping for a successful boot soon.
I have the virgin mobile cdma model of the device and that's what I will be targeting although I will do my best to make sure the device tree is universal. If anyone has any insight or advice I am all ears.
I am going to use this thread as a development thread until I get the required 10 posts and I get a booting rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im pretty sure shinrus device tree has a unified irl,its here https://github.com/shinru2004/android_device_htc_a11 ,also,did you update the kernel you were using? our kernel doesnt have support for loli,all tho rbhero has a branch in his kernel tree that he said works on loli
pattyboi:) said:
im pretty sure shinrus device tree has a unified irl,its here https://github.com/shinru2004/android_device_htc_a11 ,also,did you update the kernel you were using? our kernel doesnt have support for loli,all tho rbhero has a branch in his kernel tree that he said works on loli
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im working on all that, I'm looking into using the msm8974 kernel, from what I have read it's practically identical to the 8226, I am also using the a5 (desire 816) as a template since the two devices are so similar. Little by little I am getting there, having to figure out these errors as they come.
OnlySomeDood said:
Im working on all that, I'm looking into using the msm8974 kernel, from what I have read it's practically identical to the 8226, I am also using the a5 (desire 816) as a template since the two devices are so similar. Little by little I am getting there, having to figure out these errors as they come.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rbhero has a modded a5 tree up if you wanna take a look at it,and just since your here..
have you gotten a error to something along the lines of:
make: *** No rule to make target `/home/pattyboi/source/out/target/product/a11/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libqdutils_intermediates/export_includes', needed by `/home/pattyboi/source/out/target/product/a11/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libsurfaceflinger_intermediates/import_includes'. Stop
pattyboi:) said:
rbhero has a modded a5 tree up if you wanna take a look at it,and just since your here..
have you gotten a error to something along the lines of:
make: *** No rule to make target `/home/pattyboi/source/out/target/product/a11/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libqdutils_intermediates/export_includes', needed by `/home/pattyboi/source/out/target/product/a11/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libsurfaceflinger_intermediates/import_includes'. Stop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually just did, thanks for the heads up. I am going to look at / try his configs and see where it goes.
Yeah I have gotten a few of those errors, but not on surfaceflinger, mine are mostly on bionic and libcutils
OnlySomeDood said:
I actually just did, thanks for the heads up. I am going to look at / try his configs and see where it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gonna be trying that myself,let me know if you get anywhere
for sure, that's what this thread is for afterall
OnlySomeDood said:
for sure, that's what this thread is for afterall
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might wanna PM a mod and ask them to move this over to the development area: Desire 510 Android Development.
dip_spit said:
You might wanna PM a mod and ask them to move this over to the development area: Desire 510 Android Development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the reason I posted this here is because I don't have the required ten posts yet. So I wouldn't have been able to make this thread to post anything. This is #9 and I am making progress so i will go ahead and contact a mod soon to have it moved over.
OnlySomeDood said:
Well the reason I posted this here is because I don't have the required ten posts yet. So I wouldn't have been able to make this thread to post anything. This is #9 and I am making progress so i will go ahead and contact a mod soon to have it moved over.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha. I didn't even know that was a rule. I was just giving you the heads up lol.
no worries. yeah you need 10 posts in order to post anything in the development subforums for the devices.
I just pm'd a mod and asked to have the thread moved to the appropriate subforum. Also I am making a LITTLE Progress, it does feel like two steps forward and one step back however. I'm confident that between those of us who are wanting it that it will happen.
Not sure if anyone is interested but I created another slack room under my account if anyone developing for the 510 wants to join and collaborate in order to (hopefully) let this device see its potential. Just pm me and i'll send you an invite.
Quickie update, I keep running in to the same set of errors and I know the answer is right in front of my face but im just not seeing it. I have a sneaking suspicion that I may be missing some headers and libraries on my machine but I can't be sure.
Also I've forgotten how much I dislike working with kernels lol
OnlySomeDood said:
no worries. yeah you need 10 posts in order to post anything in the development subforums for the devices.
I just pm'd a mod and asked to have the thread moved to the appropriate subforum. Also I am making a LITTLE Progress, it does feel like two steps forward and one step back however. I'm confident that between those of us who are wanting it that it will happen.
Not sure if anyone is interested but I created another slack room under my account if anyone developing for the 510 wants to join and collaborate in order to (hopefully) let this device see its potential. Just pm me and i'll send you an invite.
Quickie update, I keep running in to the same set of errors and I know the answer is right in front of my face but im just not seeing it. I have a sneaking suspicion that I may be missing some headers and libraries on my machine but I can't be sure.
Also I've forgotten how much I dislike working with kernels lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats up with the kernel? im good in that department for the most part,roms are...eh,not my specialty
I can't get any kernel to compile, I keep getting failures while making the drivers.
Currently using a pre compiled image to at least try to get the rom built, I can solve these errors, i've done it before on other devices. How's progress on your end if any?
OnlySomeDood said:
I can't get any kernel to compile, I keep getting failures while making the drivers.
Currently using a pre compiled image to at least try to get the rom built, I can solve these errors, i've done it before on other devices. How's progress on your end if any?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you post one of the errors when you get a sec?
& none,got so angry at the stupid libqdutils thing i had last night i havent even attempted anything yet,been working on setting zswap/vnswap up so we have some leeway when it comes to ram..you got github at all?
I was fighting with libcutils for about two days, stupid friggin unicode strings....but I got past that, right now it's mostly "no rule to make target" stuff which is easy enough after you go digging around to find the right file/line to edit. Right this very second though I am working on getting the mkbootimg.mk properly set up and get a recovery image cooked.
OnlySomeDood said:
I was fighting with libcutils for about two days, stupid friggin unicode strings....but I got past that, right now it's mostly "no rule to make target" stuff which is easy enough after you go digging around to find the right file/line to edit. Right this very second though I am working on getting the mkbootimg.mk properly set up and get a recovery image cooked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think rbheros last twrp works with loli,never tested it,all tho he should me screenshots of him running it,so you might just wanna save the time and use it
pattyboi:) said:
i think rbheros last twrp works with loli,never tested it,all tho he should me screenshots of him running it,so you might just wanna save the time and use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The TeamYAR TWRP doesn't, not to my knowledge. He had one built locally but he didn't send it to me. I have a CM12 kernel that he built that boots (rom is still ****) but needs default encryption disabled amongst other things.
dip_spit said:
The TeamYAR TWRP doesn't, not to my knowledge. He had one built locally but he didn't send it to me. I have a CM12 kernel that he built that boots (rom is still ****) but needs default encryption disabled amongst other things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well sh*t..i think there is a way to disable encryption from the ramdisk..not entirely sure how tho
pattyboi:) said:
i think rbheros last twrp works with loli,never tested it,all tho he should me screenshots of him running it,so you might just wanna save the time and use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's kind of a "me" thing, If I am going to go thru the effort to port cyanogenmod to an unsupported device then I'll take the extra time to compile every bit, including the recovery.
OnlySomeDood said:
It's kind of a "me" thing, If I am going to go thru the effort to port cyanogenmod to an unsupported device then I'll take the extra time to compile every bit, including the recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont blame you,makes sense to me
Question for Kernel Devs, Re: Hotspot, DUN, "Carrier does not allow type 'dun'."
Devs of kernels, ever since Android O, attempting to add dun to APN, results in error "Carrier does not allow type 'dun.'", ever since Google baked it in for the benefit of carriers (in this particular case, T-mobile) to prevent hotspot tethering.
That's very nice of them, but not helpful for me, who must stay on Android N for my hotspot to work properly.
Can one of you kernel devs modify this so that hotspot will once again work properly, or tell me of a kernel or ROM on which it already works the way it used to?
You can let me know via DM if you don't want to reply here.
pbergonzi said:
Devs of kernels, ever since Android O, attempting to add dun to APN, results in error "Carrier does not allow type 'dun.'", ever since Google baked it in for the benefit of carriers (in this particular case, T-mobile) to prevent hotspot tethering.
That's very nice of them, but not helpful for me, who must stay on Android N for my hotspot to work properly.
Can one of you kernel devs modify this so that hotspot will once again work properly, or tell me of a kernel or ROM on which it already works the way it used to?
You can let me know via DM if you don't want to reply here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There has been work on this in LOS. Particularly @nvertigo67 has got a good understanding of the issue and has been endeavoring to enable the functionality on a case by case basis. I'd begin there if i were you.
Dirk said:
There has been work on this in LOS. Particularly @nvertigo67 has got a good understanding of the issue and has been endeavoring to enable the functionality on a case by case basis. I'd begin there if i were you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
@nvertigo67 made a custom confs file that we tested on LOS 16--while it did indeed install dun parameter, the result was still non-functional.
He is still researching, however we both believe google baked in the functionality, and it needs a kernel dev to find it. There were articles a while back (the advent of Oreo?) that refer to google having done so.
pbergonzi said:
Thank you.
@nvertigo67 made a custom confs file that we tested on LOS 16--while it did indeed install dun parameter, the result was still non-functional.
He is still researching, however we both believe google baked in the functionality, and it needs a kernel dev to find it. There were articles a while back (the advent of Oreo?) that refer to google having done so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've stated it's "more complecated" then adding dun - I've never stated it's kernel related, and I don't think it's kernel related!
I've stoped dealing with this, because I'm tired of begging for information. When we tried the modified apns-conf.xml, you told me it's not not working, but it's working unusable slowly ("like before without the modified apns-conf.xml")...
Again: this is NOT related to the kernel.
nvertigo67 said:
I've stated it's "more complecated" then adding dun - I've never stated it's kernel related, and I don't think it's kernel related!
I've stoped dealing with this, because I'm tired of begging for information. When we tried the modified apns-conf.xml, you told me it's not not working, but it's working unusable slowly ("like before without the modified apns-conf.xml")...
Again: this is NOT related to the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I apologize for misunderstanding.
Thank you for the clarification and your efforts.
nvertigo67 said:
I've stated it's "more complecated"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Found another solution--sold OP3T and got OP6T. Surprisingly, it connects properly with pie, using stock or modded ROMs.
Phew.
pbergonzi said:
Found another solution--sold OP3T and got OP6T. Surprisingly, it connects properly with pie, using stock or modded ROMs.
Phew.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which proofes, you were wrong with the dun change you've ask me to do - on los op6t and op3/t use the very same apns-conf.xml file... Perhaps because it's more complecated... *lol*
nvertigo67 said:
Which proofes, you were wrong with the dun change you've ask me to do - on los op6t and op3/t use the very same apns-conf.xml file... Perhaps because it's more complecated... *lol*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, thank you.
Hey there interweb!
This thread is meant as a general area to organise the mess of files scattered across the internet for the original Wi-Fi version of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4.
This Google Drive folder contains the following:
Stock Odin TAR/MD5 firmware files
ROMs, and their accompanying files + install instructions that have been confirmed to boot,
Kernels that have been confirmed to boot,
Useful mods which are confirmed to work and add genuine capability to your device;
and anything else which I think is useful to those wishing to mod their Tab S.
Link:
androiddev - Google Drive
drive.google.com
If you know of any files which you think should be included, and are not already here, please feel free to either reply to this thread or DM me. If you want any assistance at all, please feel free to do the same, and I will try to assist you to the best of my ability.
All the best,
Cessna
I must reiterate, as always, that although I have tested each of these mods, I am not responsible for bricks, loss of data, or permanent damage to your device. You yourself are choosing to make these modifications, and although they have my quality assurance, I can not guarantee their 100% safety. Just because they worked on my device, does not necessarily mean they will work on yours.
CessnaBroon said:
Hey there interweb!
This thread is meant as a general area to organise the mess of files scattered across the internet for the original Wi-Fi version of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4.
This Google Drive folder contains the following:
Stock Odin TAR/MD5 firmware files
ROMs, and their accompanying files + install instructions that have been confirmed to boot,
Kernels that have been confirmed to boot,
Useful mods which are confirmed to work and add genuine capability to your device;
and anything else which I think is useful to those wishing to mod their Tab S.
Link:
klimtwifi - Google Drive
drive.google.com
If you know of any files which you think should be included, and are not already here, please feel free to either reply to this thread or DM me. If you want any assistance at all, please feel free to do the same, and I will try to assist you to the best of my ability.
All the best,
Cessna
I must reiterate, as always, that although I have tested each of these mods, I am not responsible for bricks, loss of data, or permanent damage to your device. You yourself are choosing to make these modifications, and although they have my quality assurance, I can not guarantee their 100% safety. Just because they worked on my device, does not necessarily mean they will work on yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good idea to gather everything on one place and make the mess a bit easier to handle..
I helped myself with the TWRP and the LOS17, much obliged. Don't really need help otherwise.
That is, unless you know why my t705 (i have one of those too) keeps messing with me and losing charge even when switched off...
prkfsz said:
Good idea to gather everything on one place and make the mess a bit easier to handle..
I helped myself with the TWRP and the LOS17, much obliged. Don't really need help otherwise.
That is, unless you know why my t705 (i have one of those too) keeps messing with me and losing charge even when switched off...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll be honest, my Tab s battery has decreased to about 2100 mAh from 4900 so it's probably just age I'm afraid. If you use it more, you could do a battery transplant, but I don't have ROMs for klimtlte. Thanks for using my mirror
CessnaBroon said:
I'll be honest, my Tab s battery has decreased to about 2100 mAh from 4900 so it's probably just age I'm afraid. If you use it more, you could do a battery transplant, but I don't have ROMs for klimtlte. Thanks for using my mirror
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not battery. Changed it. And the same battery works fine on T700 and does not lose charge when off. Tried flashing other ROM as well, but i can't find solution.
prkfsz said:
Not battery. Changed it. And the same battery works fine on T700 and does not lose charge when off. Tried flashing other ROM as well, but i can't find solution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's odd. Have you tried flashing a custom kernel in TWRP? If not, I'll upload one to the Google Drive in the /androiddev/klimtlte folder. Will create it soon, along with instructions.
CessnaBroon said:
That's odd. Have you tried flashing a custom kernel in TWRP? If not, I'll upload one to the Google Drive in the /androiddev/klimtlte folder. Will create it soon, along with instructions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Odd indeed. And really frustrating. :-/
Have not tried with custom kernel but can of course do that, if it's simple. But, like i said - it's a T705, you mean there is one already made or are you just going to make one on a coffee break?
prkfsz said:
Odd indeed. And really frustrating. :-/
Have not tried with custom kernel but can of course do that, if it's simple. But, like i said - it's a T705, you mean there is one already made or are you just going to make one on a coffee break?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's one already made I think. I'll see if I can find one and alert you when it's up. Obvs I can't do a check for safety without the hardware so make a full backup of the boot partition just in case. I'll make sure to find one with good reviews
CessnaBroon said:
There's one already made I think. I'll see if I can find one and alert you when it's up. Obvs I can't do a check for safety without the hardware so make a full backup of the boot partition just in case. I'll make sure to find one with good reviews
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if i have the time to do it tonight or this weekend, but i will try as soon as i get the chance.
Very gratefull for all the help. I actually have two of them, with the same behaviour and i almost written them off, so..
prkfsz said:
Not sure if i have the time to do it tonight or this weekend, but i will try as soon as i get the chance.
Very gratefull for all the help. I actually have two of them, with the same behaviour and i almost written them off, so..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel - Google Drive
drive.google.com
Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. Good luck!
CessnaBroon said:
kernel - Google Drive
drive.google.com
Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. Good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you kindly, sir.
Will try right away, but can't really see if had any effect untill morning.
I thought first to ask you if it is possible to use this on stock too, but then it struck me how stupid idea that is, since it's not the same Android version. Because one of them is on stock and behaving the same way. Which basically leads me to believe that it actually is a hardware fault...
prkfsz said:
Thank you kindly, sir.
Will try right away, but can't really see if had any effect untill morning.
I thought first to ask you if it is possible to use this on stock too, but then it struck me how stupid idea that is, since it's not the same Android version. Because one of them is on stock and behaving the same way. Which basically leads me to believe that it actually is a hardware fault...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This should work on stock marshmallow too. I will give it a go and get back to you.
Thank you kindly!
lafinjack said:
Thank you kindly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're very welcome!
CessnaBroon said:
This should work on stock marshmallow too. I will give it a go and get back to you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for delay in answering..
Unfortunatelly the error is still present. Like i said, probably a software issue.
Bit thanx anuway!
Thanks for creating a section specifically for the SM-T700! I hope that I can get some practical help on moving forward
On my post here (https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/...d-but-ok-with-resurrection-remix-why.4332701/) I describe my attempt to install a variation of LineageOS 17.1 on my device -- always running into 'E1001'. I eventually settled on an older Resurrection Remix, since someone mentioned that it would ultimately make it possible to move to LineageOS (I have not tried that yet).
Here are some of my questions:
1) In a much larger/older thread (https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/...t700-sm-t705-sm-t800-sm-t800-sm-p600.4270943/) the first step is "Flash latest official Samsung Firmware with ODIN". Is this even relevant to me?
2) In preparation for successfully installing LineageOS, what TWRP clearing/formatting options should I be using? On a completely different device, the instructions were to delete *everything*. Could my wrong choices when doing this for my SM-T700 have contributed to my failures?
3) Now that I (currently) have Resurrection Remix on my SM-T700, can I expect -- with the binaries mentioned in this new subgroup -- to be able to install LineageOS 17.1 *without* running into the 'E1001' problem?
Thanks for any help!
darethehair said:
Thanks for creating a section specifically for the SM-T700! I hope that I can get some practical help on moving forward
On my post here (https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/...d-but-ok-with-resurrection-remix-why.4332701/) I describe my attempt to install a variation of LineageOS 17.1 on my device -- always running into 'E1001'. I eventually settled on an older Resurrection Remix, since someone mentioned that it would ultimately make it possible to move to LineageOS (I have not tried that yet).
Here are some of my questions:
1) In a much larger/older thread (https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/...t700-sm-t705-sm-t800-sm-t800-sm-p600.4270943/) the first step is "Flash latest official Samsung Firmware with ODIN". Is this even relevant to me?
2) In preparation for successfully installing LineageOS, what TWRP clearing/formatting options should I be using? On a completely different device, the instructions were to delete *everything*. Could my wrong choices when doing this for my SM-T700 have contributed to my failures?
3) Now that I (currently) have Resurrection Remix on my SM-T700, can I expect -- with the binaries mentioned in this new subgroup -- to be able to install LineageOS 17.1 *without* running into the 'E1001' problem?
Thanks for any help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey there! I'll take a closer look once I'm home. Speak to you then
darethehair said:
Thanks for creating a section specifically for the SM-T700! I hope that I can get some practical help on moving forward
On my post here (https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/...d-but-ok-with-resurrection-remix-why.4332701/) I describe my attempt to install a variation of LineageOS 17.1 on my device -- always running into 'E1001'. I eventually settled on an older Resurrection Remix, since someone mentioned that it would ultimately make it possible to move to LineageOS (I have not tried that yet).
Here are some of my questions:
1) In a much larger/older thread (https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/...t700-sm-t705-sm-t800-sm-t800-sm-p600.4270943/) the first step is "Flash latest official Samsung Firmware with ODIN". Is this even relevant to me?
2) In preparation for successfully installing LineageOS, what TWRP clearing/formatting options should I be using? On a completely different device, the instructions were to delete *everything*. Could my wrong choices when doing this for my SM-T700 have contributed to my failures?
3) Now that I (currently) have Resurrection Remix on my SM-T700, can I expect -- with the binaries mentioned in this new subgroup -- to be able to install LineageOS 17.1 *without* running into the 'E1001' problem?
Thanks for any help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey! Sorry for the delay. You should flash the latest firmware (it's on updato.com) Using Odin, and then twrp with Odin, and then the custom ROM from twrp, wiping data dalvik and cache before rebooting. Other two are in the mirror.
CessnaBroon said:
Hey! Sorry for the delay. You should flash the latest firmware (it's on updato.com) Using Odin, and then twrp with Odin, and then the custom ROM from twrp, wiping data dalvik and cache before rebooting. Other two are in the mirror.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just an FYI...I was reluctant to start everything over again with Odin and latest Samsung firmware, so I opted to take a chance and merely 'adb push' the LineageOS and GApps that you have on your Google drive (along with some cache erasures as you suggested) and everything seemed to upgrade properly from Resurrection Remix to LineageOS 17.1
A few minor problems so far: camera doesn't work, and initial signon to the tablet with a PIN doesn't work so well (seems to take multiple attempts). In any case, now running Android 10!
These were issues that I faced too - I never found a way to fix them. Neither did the original Dev, but apparently updating to the latest webview fixes chrome crashes. PIN you need to wait 30seconds after boot. Camera works only with clean install and even then sometimes doesn't work.
Hope this helps,
Cessna
I was trying to install TWRP but after reboot when I go to the Recovery mode there is no TWRP. I installed the LOS on my Tab Pro 8.4 and wanted to install LOS on Tab S 8.4 but can't flash the TWRP. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks