ive been messing with build.prop edits today to see if i can increase my LTE data speeds. i average around 25-35mbps normally, but today after using these lines in my build.prop, im hitting 45mbps download(in queens) today. i again deleted these lines, and am maxing at 30mbps. so i re added them, and again im maxing around 45mbps download.
add these to your build.prop, then reboot for them to take affect..
ro.ril.hsxpa=3
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=27
ro.ril.hsupa.category=7
please let me know if this works or doesnt work for you
I'm not doubting your results, but I don't think any of those lines deal with LTE.
El Daddy said:
I'm not doubting your results, but I don't think any of those lines deal with LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt think so either(which is why id like to know the results from others as well). but, i found a few being used by other lte devices, and ive never seen over 36mbps except for today after using them. i am probably going to remove a few lines though.
simms22 said:
i didnt think so either(which is why id like to know the results from others as well). but, i found a few being used by other lte devices, and ive never seen over 36mbps except for today after using them. i am probably going to remove a few lines though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's a nice explanation about those build.prop lines from @TheManii http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1610444
I do remember tweaking those lines over and over in the Nexus One days though. I could never really tell if it was doing any good or not.
I don't doubt you at all. I'm just curious as to the reason why your speeds increased.
simms22 said:
i didnt think so either(which is why id like to know the results from others as well). but, i found a few being used by other lte devices, and ive never seen over 36mbps except for today after using them. i am probably going to remove a few lines though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omni build.prop 47ms Ping, 12.22 mbps Down, 10.03 mbps Up
Modified build.prop 47ms Ping, 13.68 mbps Down, 9.13 mbps Up
Sort of a mixed bag for me on T-Mobile. Better Down with modified, better Up with Omni's.
Took these results within 10 minutes of one another with my phone remaining in the same spot, untouched each time.
El Daddy said:
Here's a nice explanation about those build.prop lines from @TheManii http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1610444
I do remember tweaking those lines over and over in the Nexus One days though. I could never really tell if it was doing any good or not.
I don't doubt you at all. I'm just curious as to the reason why your speeds increased.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i used four lines(3 of these) on my n1, ns, gnex, and n4 as well. it didnt increase speed per se, it more like "uncapped" the top speed. and it did work on them. i stopped doing it on my n4, when i enabled lte(because i didnt think it was possible to do the same with lte). now that bit of speed increase i got today made me curious if it was just a derp, if it actually works, and if it works for others.
mrfeuss said:
Omni build.prop 47ms Ping, 12.22 mbps Down, 10.03 mbps Up
Modified build.prop 47ms Ping, 13.68 mbps Down, 9.13 mbps Up
Sort of a mixed bag for me on T-Mobile. Better Down with modified, better Up with Omni's.
Took these results within 10 minutes of one another with my phone remaining in the same spot, untouched each time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im also getting slightly lower upload speeds.
simms22 said:
ive been messing with build.prop edits today to see if i can increase my LTE data speeds. i average around 25-35mbps normally, but today after using these lines in my build.prop, im hitting 45mbps download(in queens) today. i again deleted these lines, and am maxing at 30mbps. so i re added them, and again im maxing around 45mbps download.
add these to your build.prop, then reboot for them to take affect..
ro.ril.hsxpa=3
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.enable.dtm=1
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=24
ro.ril.hsupa.category=7
ro.ril.enable.a53=1
please let me know if this works or doesnt work for you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added, rebooted, and impact is rather negligible. However, didn't comb through previous build.prop set up to see if tweaks already included on ROM I'm currently running.
pwrmedia said:
Added, rebooted, and impact is rather negligible. However, didn't comb through previous build.prop set up to see if tweaks already included on ROM I'm currently running.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks
Thanks, simms. I think this increased my LTE speeds. I'll keep monitoring.
aoaleman said:
Thanks, simms. I think this increased my LTE speeds. I'll keep monitoring.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks to you as well
simms22 said:
thanks to you as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it looks like my down speeds stayed consistently slightly faster and my up speeds decreased a little. I think that was happening to others as well.
aoaleman said:
So it looks like my down speeds stayed consistently slightly faster and my up speeds decreased a little. I think that was happening to others as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to me, raised download speeds and slightly lower upload speed.
IMA give this a try and report back
LTE kinda crap in my area lol I'll see if Thiers a difference for me
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Having used those settings on non LTE phones before, I thought that they weren't necessary but helped.. a lot
Those are slow speeds because in my room i get 2 bars but the difference is noticeable after the change.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Will upload tomorrow with full signal
thanks
I'm in China atm so tested with hspa and definitely saw improvements:
download went from 7mb - 11mb
upload went 4mb - 3.5mb
So the trend seems to be download speeds improve while upload speeds slightly decrease. Thanks for the tip
simms22 said:
ive never seen over 36mbps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have ~70mbps on my Nexus 5 at January in Russian network.
i edited the op. i removed two of the lines, and edited one line. now my download speeds are averaging faster, and my upload speed is back to normal and/or slightly better
ro.ril.hsxpa=3
ro.ril.gprsclass=12
ro.ril.hep=1
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=27
ro.ril.hsupa.category=7
from http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=838388
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1610444
and other places, for the lazy people who just want to read and not cross reference
ro.ril.hsxpa=3 = whether to use UMTS, HSPDA/UMTS or HSDPA/HSPUA (3 = this option)
ro.ril.gprsclass=12 - max EDGE class speed (think 12 is max in standard)
ro.ril.hep=1 unknown
ro.ril.hsdpa.category=27 = download category 70.6Mbit/s
ro.ril.hsupa.category=7 = upload category 11.5Mbit/s
think nexus 5 has CAT4 150mbps certification
too lazy to find the default values for nexus 5, someone post? most likely the hsupa.category default value is 8. we push it down to 7, leaving space to push overhead/download in the upload bands
Related
HI, I tried to push my wizard to the max speed in battery status:
Everything load faster and it seems that surfing using the wifi is way faster now too... but after one hour my screen started behaving in a weird fashion: the letters on the screen are vibrating
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
the device is not crashing or anything the screen is just vibrating shortly after I open or close a "window"..... I throttled back to 299 but i can feel that its running at a lower frequency....
Ayle said:
HI, I tried to push my wizard to the max speed in battery status:
Everything load faster and it seems that surfing using the wifi is way faster now too... but after one hour my screen started behaving in a weird fashion: the letters on the screen are vibrating
the device is not crashing or anything the screen is just vibrating shortly after I open or close a "window"..... I throttled back to 299 but i cant feel that its running at a lower frequency....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you for real? This must be a prank post!
I mean, be for real! The Wizard runs stock at 195MHZ, the author basically warns you that monkeys might fly out of your ass if you overclock so you push it the max and complain that you're experiencing weird stuff?????
(Bet your battery drains faster also, but that just a thought)
Thanks a million! Had a tiff with the wife and you've gotten a smile out of me!
(Also, these types of post are better served in the Wizard forum, not here. (Has nothing to do with Upgrading)
As an aside, I think the most common speed here is 260MHZ with BatteryStatus...
In the 60's we were told "speed kills" ... now I know why!
Yeah the overclocking wasn't stable and affected the framebuffer or other display related speed setting and thus caused your "vibrating letters" from the sounds of things. Just to remind you that overclocking can affect RAM timings too so it may have a negative (read: PERMANENT) effect on your RAM in there too.
Dr Puttingham said:
Are you for real? This must be a prank post!
I mean, be for real! The Wizard runs stock at 195MHZ, the author basically warns you that monkeys might fly out of your ass if you overclock so you push it the max and complain that you're experiencing weird stuff?????
(Bet your battery drains faster also, but that just a thought)
Thanks a million! Had a tiff with the wife and you've gotten a smile out of me!
(Also, these types of post are better served in the Wizard forum, not here. (Has nothing to do with Upgrading)
As an aside, I think the most common speed here is 260MHZ with BatteryStatus...
In the 60's we were told "speed kills" ... now I know why!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was just to try, and no my battery dont drain that faster, I lost ~7% in 1hour with bluetooth and wifi activated. I tried the 312 settings to see how fast wm6 was at the frequency since most of the device with the legit version will run at that speed. Simple curiosity since the setting was there. But still I'm wondering what in that Omap less overclockable that say a Xscale? I remember being able to get 100mhz out of my iPaq hx2210..... And I know that the regular setting is 260 for the Wizard but even at that speed on my particular device coolcamera is sluggish and videos on Coreplayer are like slideshows this is why I choose a higher setting...... But thanks for telling me what was affected by the overspeeding....
clock speed 400mhz
help my wizard is smoking i can cook a egg on it i am running the clock speed at 400mhz
i have tried slowing it down but its so slow
is there anybody out there that has got some type of mini usb fan i can attach to it to cool down
please help
easymob said:
help my wizard is smoking i can cook a egg on it i am running the clock speed at 400mhz
i have tried slowing it down but its so slow
is there anybody out there that has got some type of mini usb fan i can attach to it to cool down
please help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try upping it to 500mhz that always helps me.
and about the usb fan. you can try putting it in the freezer to get the temp down.
500mhz
hiimcliff said:
try upping it to 500mhz that always helps me.
and about the usb fan. you can try putting it in the freezer to get the temp down.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi thanks for the advice i uped it to 500 mhz and its working like a charm
the only trouble now is that i cant hear the phone ringing in the freezer
please help
Well you see the light that comes on in the freezer? Well if you take the buld out and wire the 2 pins directly to a loudspeaker it becomes a bluetooth cellphone ringtone amplifier.
....
easymob said:
help my wizard is smoking i can cook a egg on it i am running the clock speed at 400mhz
i have tried slowing it down but its so slow
is there anybody out there that has got some type of mini usb fan i can attach to it to cool down
please help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that was good... Acually I never asked for help just information about what was causing the problem other than the overlcocking......
Not that I've been here long...but this is the first time I've actually seem some humor on this forum...I LOL'd.
Ayle said:
HI, I tried to push my wizard to the max speed in battery status:
Everything load faster and it seems that surfing using the wifi is way faster now too... but after one hour my screen started behaving in a weird fashion: the letters on the screen are vibrating
the device is not crashing or anything the screen is just vibrating shortly after I open or close a "window"..... I throttled back to 299 but i can feel that its running at a lower frequency....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running your wizard that fast is like putting it on crack or meth. Good luck, hope it doesn't melt.
--M
Jeeeez dont you guys have nothing else to do than poking fun at me?
Ayle said:
Jeeeez dont you guys have nothing else to do than poking fun at me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We could beat you... I have to say sincerely thanks for posting and thanks to the funny responses, it has been refreshing.
--M
Only 500???
Come on, someone ought to be brave and push the GHz mark with their Wizard. As a bonus, it may even save on your home heating bill!
Im really sick of the way some people act on this forum
we all know you can put phones in freezers. This forum isnt made for jokes or lies, some people are really trying to get help. What happened if someone really put it in the freezer?? Then what would be so funny?
Newbies: please don't do anything anyone has said here, phones that are overclocked obviously need to be held under running water. Make sure to press all the buttons so the water can get to the problem source.
Honestly, i really cant believe you guys
Delete Me, and grr to the post length rule
shiggins9 said:
Come on, someone ought to be brave and push the GHz mark with their Wizard. As a bonus, it may even save on your home heating bill!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that maybe a car battery might work, run the AC (putting the phone in front of a vent of course), direct wire the phone--you don't need to worry about a fuse--I don't think it will run much more than 3 or 4 seconds--it'll be fast for a little bit.
--M
BBowermaster said:
Delete Me, and grr to the post length rule
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh come on, i wish everyone could see your original post lol, we all have our moments
LOL, I didn't read your entire post at first, and thought you were serious, then I read the "run it under water" part and was like, "crap, he fooled me."
lol good im glad, i wanted to sound really mean
I found this thread very useful on the N4 forums, so here it is for the Nexus 5.
First, what is undervolting?
No two CPUs are made equally, every one is slightly different. This means they each need a different minimum voltage to run completely stable, so manufacturers set it high enough so that every chip can run without needing a voltage tailored to that specific chip. But this means that most devices can have their voltages lowered, and still run 100% stable
What are the benefits of undervolting?
In my experience, heat reduction is the main benefit. However, this heat reduction has implications elsewhere; for instance it means the thermal throttling will kick in later, so there is less of a performance drop. Also, less power is wasted to heat, meaning marginal gains in battery life. If you cannot run higher frequencies, i.e. over 2.26GHz, undervolting/overvolting these frequencies may help.
Any disadvantages?
Not really - you may experience reboots and instability, but that means you need to raise the voltages. Also, make sure you don't check set on boot until you know the voltages are stable, but if you have any problems you can flash the stock kernel, or in worst case wipe the data from a recovery.
How do I undervolt?
Many CPU apps are available to change the voltages, but personally I use Trickster Mod (donate). Just slowly decrease your voltages, small amounts at a time, and set them on boot when you are happy they are stable.
If you want to really want to get your voltages perfect, you can set the min/max frequency to one you want to modify, and edit each frequency to perfection. To save time, I'd recommend starting with the highly used frequencies - many apps can tell you which your device uses most often.
CPU Binning
I know on the nexus 4 the cpu bin was related to the amount users could undervolt, and Im sure the case is still the same, so heres how you can find out your CPU bin: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2515593 It would be useful to include your CPU bin in your post.
Here are my initial voltages, running ElementalX v0.7, CPU bin 3 and PSX - please, feel free to share yours (and your knowledge);
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Rules of the thread
Be nice to each other, use search if you have a question, and don't flame noobs for no reason.
It would be helpful to include your CPU bin and kernel in your post.
Also, if I have made any errors in the OP or you feel something should be added, quote this (so I get notified) and tell me, I'm sure theres a lot more information I could include!
Reserved
PVS3 -50 Stable
uh60james said:
What's your CPU bin?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just added to the op, I have a 3, which I think is about in the middle? I haven't had a proper look at the thread yet to find out
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Tom540 said:
I have a 3, which I think is about in the middle?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a 3 too. So far sitting stable at a global -62.5 undervolt the past few days. Tried -75 a few times and got reboots when turning the screen on.
AndrasLOHF said:
I have a 3 too. So far sitting stable at a global -62.5 undervolt the past few days. Tried -75 a few times and got reboots when turning the screen on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same has just happened to me too, so I'll bump them up to -62.5, although I think I should be able to keep the lower CPU clocks at lower voltages as I'm sure the higher ones are used when turning on the screen
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I'm running franco r14 and got two almost immediate reboots on your settings. Gonna go a little easier. I have no experience doing this, so it's still a bit confusing.
can probably go a bit easier on the higher clocks, my settings are -75 mv below 1.8 ghz and -50 above. Just played some deer hunter 2014 and seems to be fine. No reboots so farr! My bin is 3 as well. Running stock rom with faux003b6 kernel
I have a bin of 3 as well. I've only been brave enough to go -37.5 on Fauxs latest beta kernel
Sent from the jaws of my Hammerhead!
Got a CPU bin of 2. I went for -50 undervolt for all frequencies on Faux kernel 002 a few days ago, no reboots so far. Haven't tried -62.5 but -75 was too much, so I'll stick with -50.
I was a little bummed when I found out I had bin 2, but I've been running -75mv no problem for the past few days on bricked kernel
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
You guys are lucky. My phone has bin of 1, could only uv 50mv on high frequency and 75mv on the low end, and I have higher default voltage to begin with.
---------- Post added at 01:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 AM ----------
So far I believe the best app to test UV stability is Antutu Benchmark, I could pass StabilityTest no problem but Antutu always FC when I UV bit too hard.
Spunky_Monkey said:
I was a little bummed when I found out I had bin 2, but I've been running -75mv no problem for the past few days on bricked kernel
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
gd6noob said:
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly the same with me - I think I might be able to set the lower CPU clocks with voltages lower though, I just need a bit more time to test
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I have a PVS 0 and I can undervolt - 100 without any lockups or reboot. Actually the device hasn't rebooted on me once ever. The only problem is it lacks CPU performance but the GPU works fine.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Tom540 said:
Exactly the same with me - I think I might be able to set the lower CPU clocks with voltages lower though, I just need a bit more time to test
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me know what your findings are... im just too lazy to test all the configs..
gd6noob said:
wow.. im have bin 3 and anything past -62 I get reboots... I think I got ripped of on on my cpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bin 3 here, I've been running with - 75 since yesterday without problem... Maybe I'll go lower
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk 2
PVS 2 running - 75 volts full speed. Deer hunter runs great so far. Might try - 100 after more testing.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
seems like pvs3 is NOT the best for UVing, its all accross the board, im on PVS2 and i think i can do -75 easily , i think im on -50 accross, using franco kernel r14
It might be helpful if everyone included the actual voltages as well, as some have reported starting with different voltages, and some kernels UV put of the box.
PVS 3, I'm running 712.5 @ 300MHz, and 962.5 @ 2.26GHz; check the screenshot in the OP for all voltages
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I'm curious to see what kind of speeds you guys are running you snapdragon 800 with voltage myself i managed to get to 2880 ghz running stock voltages and my cpu bin is PVS 0 has anyone managed to get to 3.0 GHZ or maybe even further post your speeds and voltage below
voltages are default trinity kernel, pvs 3, speed is obvious..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
simms22 said:
voltages are default trinity kernel, pvs 3, speed is obvious..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's battery? 1 hr screen time?
aooga said:
How's battery? 1 hr screen time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, at that cpu speed, you are not allowed consider battery life! but i do use 2880/300 occasionally for a daily. ill see 4-4.5h sot normally with 2880/300. you have to remember, it doesnt stay at 2880mhz, itll only go there if it needs to.
simms22 said:
lol, at that cpu speed, you are not allowed consider battery life! but i do use 2880/300 occasionally for a daily. ill see 4-4.5h sot normally with 2880/300. you have to remember, it doesnt stay at 2880mhz, itll only go there if it needs to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really? i dont see that much sot on stock speed i only get about 3.5hr sot max and thats with light usage
driftshadows said:
really? i dont see that much sot on stock speed i only get about 3.5hr sot max and thats with light usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I regularly see 5-6 hours SoT on everything stock. Check the battery results thread as many are getting 7-8 with under clocking.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
driftshadows said:
really? i dont see that much sot on stock speed i only get about 3.5hr sot max and thats with light usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
at stock speeds i usually see between 5 and 6 hours sot with heavy usage, on lte 100% of the time(no wifi). ill normally kill my battery in 7-12 hours, but that because im always using the phone. i dont let it lay around sleeping for hours.
simms22 said:
you have to remember, it doesnt stay at 2880mhz, itll only go there if it needs to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I was talking about your screenshot where it said both the min/max were 3000. You get pretty good battery out of this phone with 2880. I get about 3 hours on 1700, but thats for a different thread.
aooga said:
Yeah, I was talking about your screenshot where it said both the min/max were 3000. You get pretty good battery out of this phone with 2880. I get about 3 hours on 1700, but thats for a different thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i put it to 3014/3014 to makes sure and to show that it was actually running at 3014mhz. id be affraid to guess the battery life
simms22 said:
i put it to 3014/3014 to makes sure and to show that it was actually running at 3014mhz. id be affraid to guess the battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What voltages do you run 3014 MHz at? You said stock voltages, but could you look those up for me? I've been able to run Franco at 2880, but at 3014 I get reboots
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Gormsen said:
What voltages do you run 3014 MHz at? You said stock voltages, but could you look those up for me? I've been able to run Franco at 2880, but at 3014 I get reboots
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
reboots would be the normal behavior, i would think most phones wont be able to run at 3014mhz
driftshadows said:
really? i dont see that much sot on stock speed i only get about 3.5hr sot max and thats with light usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from this evening/morning http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=50450077&postcount=4001
Swadin1 said:
Its helpful for me. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know there's a thanks button for that, right?
Okay, so I couldn't get Franco r33 to run more than 2880 MHz, so I switched to the newest Trinity (The one from the new build environment) and now I can easily hit 3014 MHz. I don't know if it will ever be of any use, but it's nice to know that it's possible
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Gormsen said:
You know there's a thanks button for that, right?
Okay, so I couldn't get Franco r33 to run more than 2880 MHz, so I switched to the newest Trinity (The one from the new build environment) and now I can easily hit 3014 MHz. I don't know if it will ever be of any use, but it's nice to know that it's possible
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sweet, so im not the only one that can
simms22 said:
sweet, so im not the only one that can
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, don't you think everybody is able to? Your device being a PSV 0 and mine being a 4, I don't think it makes much difference.
It could be fun to see how far we can push it. I don't experience any problems on 3014, so I'm thinking that we can go higher
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Gormsen said:
Nope, don't you think everybody is able to? Your device being a PSV 0 and mine being a 4, I don't think it makes much difference.
It could be fun to see how far we can push it. I don't experience any problems on 3014, so I'm thinking that we can go higher
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im a pvs 3. for 3 and 4 it should be easier to run. anyways, all cpus arent equal, some are better than others.
simms22 said:
im a pvs 3. for 3 and 4 it should be easier to run. anyways, all cpus arent equal, some are better than others.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry there, misread a previous post if yours. But think about it, wouldn't it be awesome figuring out how much we can push it. As a bonus I would love tauting my little brother, joking about how my phone runs at the double amount of clocks of his One (if 3.4 GHz is even possible)
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
bblzd said:
I regularly see 5-6 hours SoT on everything stock. Check the battery results thread as many are getting 7-8 with under clocking.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I get I might switch kernels to that could be the problem because I under clocked today and didn't do much on my phone as I was at school
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I tryed 3ghz and got a reboot. PVS 2 Trinity.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Tunderpimp said:
I tryed 3ghz and got a reboot. PVS 2 Trinity.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you try adjust the voltage at 3014mhz?
I was feeling there was an issue with my Note 9 compared to my Note 8 and P20p Thus i decided to do a speedtest. the phones were at the same place and nothing was using the bandwidth. Surprise. look at the video, and you will see. (N8 and p20 came with the same results).
I would like to ask some of you who already have it to test it against other phones to see if i'm the only one with this issue. I have the latest firmware on it and didn't test it before the update...but this is really not normal. I also feel it's just "slower" in general than the p20p...
check this link for the video
Upload video on Youtube plz
Yeah, as a network engineer I'm not going to touch random files on a Dropbox. At least link a speedtest.net result or the image.
I have my note 9 coming on Friday so I can put some effort into getting the optimal wireless connection (there's so many variables involved, I'm a wireless network engineer working for a wisp so all in my realm of knowledge) and give it a test.
I'd be very surprised if its a downgrade compared to Huawei, Samsung spend a lot of time on their LTE radios, now running on CAT 18, with MIMO, for a theoretical bandwidth of 1.2 gbit/s. Will know for sure Friday!
---------- Post added at 05:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------
Can't find info on the chipset in the S9+, but I can find that they have MU-MIMO and 1024QAM, so it definitely should be quicker if you have a router supporting the above.
https://bgr.com/2018/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s9-specs-galaxy-s9-plus-specs-complete-list/
Zanr Zij said:
Upload video on Youtube plz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MartyDingo said:
Yeah, as a network engineer I'm not going to touch random files on a Dropbox. At least link a speedtest.net result or the image.
I have my note 9 coming on Friday so I can put some effort into getting the optimal wireless connection (there's so many variables involved, I'm a wireless network engineer working for a wisp so all in my realm of knowledge) and give it a test.
I'd be very surprised if its a downgrade compared to Huawei, Samsung spend a lot of time on their LTE radios, now running on CAT 18, with MIMO, for a theoretical bandwidth of 1.2 gbit/s. Will know for sure Friday!
---------- Post added at 05:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------
Can't find info on the chipset in the S9+, but I can find that they have MU-MIMO and 1024QAM, so it definitely should be quicker if you have a router supporting the above.
https://bgr.com/2018/02/25/samsung-galaxy-s9-specs-galaxy-s9-plus-specs-complete-list/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go guys. will update the original post also
https://youtu.be/xEOVgHz7dhg
PS : for information i'm on Ubiquiti hardware here.
Strangely i was able to when i cleared cache....
Aha, well, I'm UBWA certified actually
We're bound to see some minor oddities like such before launch, nice to know its not the phone!
not that shocking to be honest shocking would be getting like 2mg dl not still nearly 50 lol
MartyDingo said:
Aha, well, I'm UBWA certified actually
We're bound to see some minor oddities like such before launch, nice to know its not the phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would interested in your thoughts, post on Friday or weekend in UK thread
vadimo said:
i would interested in your thoughts, post on Friday or weekend in UK thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shall do!
I'll be doing it for my own amusement so definitely happy to share!
Since the test was on WiFi, and not LTE the work Samsung has done on the modem is irelivant.
My question is, are they really on the same network? The results make me think that your Note may be hitting the 2ghz network not the 5ghz network.
boufa said:
Since the test was on WiFi, and not LTE the work Samsung has done on the modem is irelivant.
My question is, are they really on the same network? The results make me think that your Note may be hitting the 2ghz network not the 5ghz network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the thead mate, it was a cache issue. I was only pointing out Samsungs dedication to connectivity, and I did follow up with somewhat comparable specs for the radio.
It could be a number of things, potentially more sensitive radio in the note 9 that struggles to handle interference, etc, it'd be pretty obvious to be on the wrong network.
MartyDingo said:
Read the thead mate, it was a cache issue. I was only pointing out Samsungs dedication to connectivity, and I did follow up with somewhat comparable specs for the radio.
It could be a number of things, potentially more sensitive radio in the note 9 that struggles to handle interference, etc, it'd be pretty obvious to be on the wrong network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps Mate, you need to clarify... first you wrote "shocking!" in the header of the thread, then in one post you said "Strangely i was able to when i cleared cache...." which didn't mean anything to me, and certainly not that you discovered the problem.
And no... being on a 2ghz network vs 5ghz network can be an invisible decision made by the hardware, and many networks are using the same network name. So it wouldn't necessarily be obvious.
For example, in my house, the network ID is "MyHouse" for both the 5ghz and the 2 ghz networks... the Chromecast is on the 2ghz network, and my phone is hitting the 5 ghz network. They see each other and is seamless.
Dude, I don't know one router that has the same SSID by default for both networks. Someone changing the network should notice the difference then.
BTW, I'm not OP, just someone helping.
vadimo said:
i would interested in your thoughts, post on Friday or weekend in UK thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely not an issue!
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/4187326458
Though i would add my results here also, Verizon snapdragon model. Definitely seems like something is going on with your test. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/4188275993
so you guys testing your wifi speed using your isp network is telling us what exactly?
at best you should test locally but even there. if your network equipment is not on pare then again your testing with too many faulty variables and it won't show phones true potential.
ignorant people would state that a phones wifi has issues because upload speeds sucks compared to DL or just both seem slow.
but in fact what sucks is ISP internet package and not the phone. obviously other parameters like specific servers the test is being done on can co tribute to faulty 'online' test results.
so we have a few factors which make tests like these irrelevant:
-****ty internet package subscription
-****ty test server
-****ty home network
for cell data tests, well we need good weather and be near a cell tower.
but again this proves less concerning phone's capabilites as throughput but more towards signal quality.
and the average will be provider's coverage. how many towers they utilise and your signal strength in general in most common locations you visit.
*btw OP dude, do everyone a favor and correct your thread title...
i was tested on 4 devices, Note 8, XZ2, Iphone X and Note 9, so seem XZ2 always faster and winner
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
bober10113 said:
so you guys testing your wifi speed using your isp network is telling us what exactly?
at best you should test locally but even there. if your network equipment is not on pare then again your testing with too many faulty variables and it won't show phones true potential.
ignorant people would state that a phones wifi has issues because upload speeds sucks compared to DL or just both seem slow.
but in fact what sucks is ISP internet package and not the phone. obviously other parameters like specific servers the test is being done on can co tribute to faulty 'online' test results.
so we have a few factors which make tests like these irrelevant:
-****ty internet package subscription
-****ty test server
-****ty home network
for cell data tests, well we need good weather and be near a cell tower.
but again this proves less concerning phone's capabilites as throughput but more towards signal quality.
and the average will be provider's coverage. how many towers they utilise and your signal strength in general in most common locations you visit.
*btw OP dude, do everyone a favor and correct your thread title...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry dude, but there's so many more factors to be able to throw any of this out. I really hope no one is taking this that seriously.
For one, I have no idea about the noise floor (background EMF noise level) on whichever frequency people have decided to run your AP. (Be it 2.4 or 5ghz, and then which channel, 2.4 ghz only really has three channels, 1,6,11, with the other channels just being overlaps. 5ghz has a lot more but usually everything is on 5180 (channel 36) due to DFS above 5250mhz in mos6 countries. Chances are all of you are suffering from interference.
Then we could talk about MIMO. Each MIMO chain nets you +3db so routers supporting MU-MIMO could see big signal increases just from both devices having multiple MIMO streams going on.
S9+ (and probably the note 9) supports QAM1024, essentially fitting more data over a link at once to the risk of needing a higher signal to noise ratio (this is where noise floors and interference comes heavily into it)
Every situation is unique, I think we should try and explore but please share your enviroment, I.e your router, where you are (apartment, house, city, rural etc) and then we can only start making sense of things.
MartyDingo said:
Sorry dude, but there's so many more factors to be able to throw any of this out. I really hope no one is taking this that seriously.
For one, I have no idea about the noise floor (background EMF noise level) on whichever frequency people have decided to run your AP. (Be it 2.4 or 5ghz, and then which channel, 2.4 ghz only really has three channels, 1,6,11, with the other channels just being overlaps. 5ghz has a lot more but usually everything is on 5180 (channel 36) due to DFS above 5250mhz in mos6 countries. Chances are all of you are suffering from interference.
Then we could talk about MIMO. Each MIMO chain nets you +3db so routers supporting MU-MIMO could see big signal increases just from both devices having multiple MIMO streams going on.
S9+ (and probably the note 9) supports QAM1024, essentially fitting more data over a link at once to the risk of needing a higher signal to noise ratio (this is where noise floors and interference comes heavily into it)
Every situation is unique, I think we should try and explore but please share your enviroment, I.e your router, where you are (apartment, house, city, rural etc) and then we can only start making sense of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but you have to agree that it is folly to report wifi speedtests using home internet and its limitations by the ISP as being a way to gauge a phone's capabilites.
bober10113 said:
but you have to agree that it is folly to report wifi speedtests using home internet and its limitations by the ISP as being a way to gauge a phone's capabilites.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I'm not sure I agree.
If you cable into your router and do a speed test, and use that as your comparison point, I don't see the problem with using a home connection to test.
I don't know what limitations you're talking about, in my experience for speed testing you're routed into the DC where your ISP has its presence then either a speed test server within your ISPs DC network or one right next to it in the same DC.
---------- Post added at 03:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:32 PM ----------
Now if you're using the router supplied by your ISP, whole different story.
I have a 150Mbps internet connection which hits up to 170Mbps . I don't have separate band for WIFI. I ran speed test on my pc connected to the WIFI and it shows 161Mbps and when checking the same on my Galaxy Note 9, it doesn't go more than 90Mbps. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
Note: I have turned off Bluetooth, Location and sim services. Done resetting and clearing cache. Tried the same with no other apps installed.
Just tested without disabling anything (bt on, many apps in background etc).
So Exynos model wifi is much faster than 100Mbps.
Something's really wrong with your phone or wifi network.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
On my router at home, sometimes when I connect, I have to reconnect straight away to get the best speeds. I think it might be something to do with 2.4 vs 5ghz bands.
Your rooter is probably at fault. You need an AC rooter with more than 300 MB (as its 150 dl+150ul) set on 5Ghz with 80Mhz. Look at my stats on a Gigabit connection. I did the test while streaming a 4k hdr tv show on netflix
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
bat0nas said:
Just tested without disabling anything (bt on, many apps in background etc).
So Exynos model wifi is much faster than 100Mbps.
Something's really wrong with your phone or wifi network.View attachment 4594944
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. Can you suggest me a way to fix this issue? I can provide you screenshots of my router config and mobile.
Jonathan-H said:
On my router at home, sometimes when I connect, I have to reconnect straight away to get the best speeds. I think it might be something to do with 2.4 vs 5ghz bands.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. Let me try this.
daniel_cassian said:
Your rooter is probably at fault. You need an AC rooter with more than 300 MB (as its 150 dl+150ul) set on 5Ghz with 80Mhz. Look at my stats on a Gigabit connection. I did the test while streaming a 4k hdr tv show on netflixView attachment 4595243
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply. I have tested my router with multiple devices and the speed test always shows above 150Mbps. The issue is with my mobile or the config that my router does when connecting this device. Can you please provide any advice on this?
I'm having slow Wi-Fi performance as well.
I discovered it when I was doing concurrent benchmark app downloads with my LG v30+.
The Note 9 was at least 1/2 as slow (or slower).
Same network & same time so it's not likely a router thing in my case.
This was at work so It's 2.4Ghz.
I'll try testing at home on 5Ghz to see if the issue is the same.
Fastest wifi I've had on a phone yet
NTTDNV said:
I'm having slow Wi-Fi performance as well.
I discovered it when I was doing concurrent benchmark app downloads with my LG v30+.
The Note 9 was at least 1/2 as slow (or slower).
Same network & same time so it's not likely a router thing in my case.
This was at work so It's 2.4Ghz.
I'll try testing at home on 5Ghz to see if the issue is the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply mate. Waiting for your test result.
I think i would help if you specifi if its a 6GB Ram or 8GB Ram version.
razzrmaxx said:
I think i would help if you specifi if its a 6GB Ram or 8GB Ram version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is 6GB, exynos 9810, the base variant in India.
NTTDNV said:
I'm having slow Wi-Fi performance as well.
I discovered it when I was doing concurrent benchmark app downloads with my LG v30+.
The Note 9 was at least 1/2 as slow (or slower).
Same network & same time so it's not likely a router thing in my case.
This was at work so It's 2.4Ghz.
I'll try testing at home on 5Ghz to see if the issue is the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any luck on fixing the issue?
razzrmaxx said:
I think i would help if you specifi if its a 6GB Ram or 8GB Ram version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that.
Note 9
256GB
6GB RAM
US Model (Snapdragon)
rajaseemanps said:
Any luck on fixing the issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With this morning's tests the phone seems to be performing better.
I downloaded two different apps, and at first it started out slower but both times it caught up and ended up downloading faster than the control phone.
I'll keep checking and report back if the issue returns.
It's baaaaaaaak!
I thought it was better.
But started noticing I had messages sitting unsent, and just general download slowness.
Did another side-by-side comparison with the LG V30+.
Two of these tests were done simultaneously, two sequentially.
All are looking pretty bad for the Note.
Did a "reset settings" and a "reset network settings", didn't improve anything.
Just did a restart and it fared no better.
I may have to resort to a factory reset, don't want to as phone is finally all set up.
NTTDNV said:
It's baaaaaaaak!
I thought it was better.
But started noticing I had messages sitting unsent, and just general download slowness.
Did another side-by-side comparison with the LG V30+.
Two of these tests were done simultaneously, two sequentially.
All are looking pretty bad for the Note.
Did a "reset settings" and a "reset network settings", didn't improve anything.
Just did a restart and it fared no better.
I may have to resort to a factory reset, don't want to as phone is finally all set up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This really sucks man. I feel robbed now. Started hating Note 9. :crying:
rajaseemanps said:
This really sucks man. I feel robbed now. Started hating Note 9. :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm hoping it's fixable.
I gave Samsung a second chance (I had the Note 7).
I'm really liking the phone, but I really like my LG V20 and V30 and the V40 is about to drop.
I'm within the return window at Sprint, gonna have to decide soon.
---------- Post added at 01:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:51 PM ----------
Update,
My work's router seems to be the issue after all.
I'm not able to reset it during the business day, but I did plug in a second router into it and the speed improved greatly.
It seems to now be on par with my other phone now.
I will keep testing.
Second update:The 5Ghz is smoking fast, 66Mbps up/down. This is on the secondary router.
I'm not sure why our router hates my phone but it does.
Connect to it; little to no Wi-Fi throughput.
Connect to the router plugged into it; normal Wi-Fi throughput.
Since I had two comparable devices connected to the same network, It never would have occurred to me it could be the router.
Another good step to do that I forgot about, after resetting settings power off and boot into bootloader and clear the cache.
Verizon Note 9
My Note 9 is slower than other devices on my WiFi network. I have Galaxy S8 Plus and Fios 75/75 service , when I run speed test my S8 shows about 80/80 but Note 9 never goes more than 65/55 . The same results with my second Note 9 , so it definitely problem with their phones. Shame on you Samsung!
my wifi is broke, I'm not getting 1Gbps: