Are all Mi3 roms compatible with Mi4?
Sent from my MI 4 using Tapatalk
Yes.. Also, you should probably ask this question in an already existing related thread instead of making another. You'd probably get a quicker answers and the forums will be cleaner
No. I remember installing some very old CAF rom which did not boot in my Mi4w.
Related
? i Want to change the kernel
Nothing to help me
The answer is not so easy, it depends.
Some prefer FuguMod others Glitch others Neo. It depends.
There is a thread about this in the i9000 android development here at xda. Next time use 'search' or read some more.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Hey guys! I've just purchased my Nexus 4 16 GB model and I was wondering what is the the best kernel for it? I haven't tried Faux123 yet, but the first thing I did was flashed Franco, but it's not stable yet. Is there a stable, fast and smooth kernel out there yet? Okay, here is my second question. Is there a Deodex ROM available for the Nexus 4? I love stock because it is the most stable when testing kernels...thanks again guys!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
There's no such thing as "best" kernel, this thread has been posed in the wrong section, and a very simple search for the word "deodex" should get you what you're looking for in the Development sections.
Closed
Hi
I must say I am a bit disconnected from the Android world since I get to university and I must ask how all have evolved. I'm looking for the newest most stable custom roms at the moment of this post. I think it would be a good idea to maintain a post like this to keep track of what roms have reached a stable, proven state without having to dig too much.
Cheers!
16bitboy said:
Hi
I must say I am a bit disconnected from the Android world since I get to university and I must ask how all have evolved. I'm looking for the newest most stable custom roms at the moment of this post. I think it would be a good idea to maintain a post like this to keep track of what roms have reached a stable, proven state without having to dig too much.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well there's the RC4 build (release candidate 4) of cyanogen mod 10.1 that's quite good. Its based on android 4.2.2.
Take note that you should ask questions in the questions section and ROM discussions are generally frowned upon so do venture into the development section to learn more about them.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
ballsofsteel said:
Take note that you should ask questions in the questions section and ROM discussions are generally frowned upon so do venture into the development section to learn more about them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OOPS!! I forgot the Q&A section totally. I would like to move this post or delete it but I don't see how I should do it. The Edit/delete button just drives me to the edit section and I don't see any way of deleting the post.
No worries, a mod will lock or move this thread eventually
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
I recommend roms with Mackay kernel, they are often stable and durable in battery but less powerful than Devil kernel. By the way, no one has moved or deleted this post yet =))
latest official samsung firmware tend to be the fastest most secure and stable ... try it maybe [ROOTED / 3FILE] XWJWB#_XEEJW2_XWJW1 by stock+
somator said:
latest official samsung firmware tend to be the fastest most secure and stable ... try it maybe [ROOTED / 3FILE] XWJWB#_XEEJW2_XWJW1 by stock+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest official firmware for this phone is it 4.1 or 4.2?
Sent from my X10 using xda app-developers app
epulrevo said:
Latest official firmware for this phone is it 4.1 or 4.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that particular 2.3.6 (XWJWB_XEEJW2_XWJW1)
Just wondering why we have 2 different development forums? Seems they both have similar content but I have to go from one to the other and I'm not sure there's any reason for having both? Anyone else think this is annoying?
We have 2 one for AOSP based Roms and one for touch wiz roms. The one for touchwiz is Roms that are based on the phones original firmware. The other are based on stock android.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Read the stickies in each one. It explains it well.
killakarl said:
We have 2 one for AOSP based Roms and one for touch wiz roms. The one for touchwiz is Roms that are based on the phones original firmware. The other are based on stock android.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true. Read the stickies. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2257061
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
Hmm now I feel dumb...been here forever and this is the first time I've seen those touchwiz and aosp separated in different forums. Thanks for letting me know!
killakarl said:
We have 2 one for AOSP based Roms and one for touch wiz roms. The one for touchwiz is Roms that are based on the phones original firmware. The other are based on stock android.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO this is very wrong! Read the sticky in Original development. Only ROMs created from ground up like CM and AOKP are original. Any clone or cherry picked ROM does not belong in Original Development.
kennyglass123 said:
NO this is very wrong! Read the sticky in Original development. Only ROMs created from ground up like CM and AOKP are original. Any clone or cherry picked ROM does not belong in Original Development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what your saying is we have a second development forum for 2 roms. All other AOSP roms are clones of them aren't they?
cruise350 said:
So what your saying is we have a second development forum for 2 roms. All other AOSP roms are clones of them aren't they?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also for kernels, ROMs with custom kernels, ROMs built from the ground up. Definitey not for someone who just follows CM's instructions on how to build from their source and they change one thing. That is not original. The huge misconception that one is for TW makes no sense on Google devices...then nothing should go in Android Development? The Original Development section was created to reward developers and teams who have created or modified 100's of lines of code and put a lot of original work into their release.
I have searched about roms Galaxy Music GT-S6010 GTS6010L etc... But I was able only to find about requests for doing a cyanogenmod for this phone, rooting guides and upgrading to official 4.1 guides but nothing about custom roms. Why is nearly imposible to find or make roms for this phone? I think it would work perfectly with CM 10.1
Also this leaves me with another question, why there aren't custom recoveries for this phone? I know they are extremely hard to do but is there no interest on this phone?
Enviado desde mi MW0711 mediante Tapatalk
The phone is not available in most major dev`s country, i never even heard of this phone until you said it here
thats why it don`t have roms, cwm for this phone cause it is not available anywhere else
TakuyaZ said:
The phone is not available in most major dev`s country, i never even heard of this phone until you said it here
thats why it don`t have roms, cwm for this phone cause it is not available anywhere else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for answering, that's a shame:crying: ,is is possible to port roms finding a similar phone?
Alonso1398 said:
Thanks for answering, that's a shame:crying: ,is is possible to port roms finding a similar phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may be possible, but the bug fixing may become time wasting
Sent from my C2105 using Tapatalk
Ok I tried to make a recovery through cwm builder but I couldn't flash it correctly, another question, in rom manager, if it asks to confirm the device for recovery but appears others, those devices are siblings of the phone?
Sorry for mi bad english
Edit:Forget about that, I've been researching a lot and I think that the samsung galaxy pocket plus is a similar device, probably you are right and fixing bugs may be a waste of time however I really want at least CM so I will do more research about it
Enviado desde mi GT-S6010L mediante Tapatalk