Is the processor in the tilt an XScale or ARM processor? I have been searching and different reports say different things...
brynwall said:
Is the processor in the tilt an XScale or ARM processor? I have been searching and different reports say different things...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qualcomm ARM.
Xscale is Intel/Marvell ARM. OMAP is Texas Instruments' ARM.
Thank you, I kept getting conflicting info.
Related
whats SH3 MIPS & ARM?
and what is the one for XDA IIs?
SH3, MIPS, and ARM are all different processors, like the PowerPC processor in Mac and the x86 (intel/amd) processors in Windows.
In the PPC 2000 devices (the first gen), each company that released a PPC had a different processo...
HP Jornada = sh3
Casio Casiopea = mips
Compaq iPaq = arm
because ARM was the best out of the bunch, MS standardized on the ARM processor for all PPC 2002 devices. Thus, you want ARM when asked.
Although your processor is called Xscale, it's still an ARM design, as is the StrongARM and OMAP processors. Hope that helps!
matthew_wetton said:
whats SH3 MIPS & ARM?
and what is the one for XDA IIs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can anyone explain betweeen the intel core duo and quad...obviously price and duo and quad....and which is better intel or AMD, also wut is the best processor under 200
i guess no one kno
better, no idea,
core duo and quad are so named because duo has 2 processors on one die, and quad has 4 on one die
i think theres not much difference between them these days,
and the best for sub 200 quid, get the highest cache, FSB and Speed you can obviously
Best Quad Under 200$ (195$): Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz LGA 775 Quad-Core Processor Model HH80562PH0568M
Best Dual Under 200$(190$): Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Wolfdale 3.0GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor Model BX80570E8400
There you go
rico002 said:
can anyone explain betweeen the intel core duo and quad...obviously price and duo and quad....and which is better intel or AMD, also wut is the best processor under 200
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
www.tomshardware.com
Try this link, there are a lot of comparisons between processors, graphic cards, ....
Mikulec said:
www.tomshardware.com
Try this link, there are a lot of comparisons between processors, graphic cards, ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...But i made it so he wouldnt have to read
zeezee said:
...But i made it so he wouldnt have to read
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, that was nice from u. But at the site u can choose benchmark and compare the performance of the CPUs (unfortunately I dont know if there is posibility to campare intel duo and quad, need to look at it).
EDIT: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/...,1225,1291,1223,1222,1289,1279,1313,1276,1311
that should do it.
coo...thnks ppl, that duo under 200 3.0 is nice i thnk ima get that one, its prolly on newegg
rico002 said:
coo...thnks ppl, that duo under 200 3.0 is nice i thnk ima get that one, its prolly on newegg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha yep - it sure is
It's been bugging me, how the Kaiser has a 400 MHz processor and 128 MB of RAM, yet still isn't quite that snappy. As a point of comparison, I have a Thinkpad 770Z, which has a 233 MHz Pentium II processor and 128 MB of RAM. This is capable of running Windows XP SP2 without excessive lag. The Kaiser runs a stripped down version of Windows, yet isn't quite up to par with an inferior machine, based on specs. Is this due to processor instruction sets or source code efficiency? Why is there such a disparity in performance?
PointZero said:
It's been bugging me, how the Kaiser has a 400 MHz processor and 128 MB of RAM, yet still isn't quite that snappy. As a point of comparison, I have a Thinkpad 770Z, which has a 233 MHz Pentium II processor and 128 MB of RAM. This is capable of running Windows XP SP2 without excessive lag. The Kaiser runs a stripped down version of Windows, yet isn't quite up to par with an inferior machine, based on specs. Is this due to processor instruction sets or source code efficiency? Why is there such a disparity in performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe u should ask HTC.
The two systems are completely different - perhaps it's a bit like expecting a mouse to outrun a rabbit as it has a 500bpm heart rate compared to 130bpm.
Also, are you sure you can run XP well on a 233Mhz P11 with 128mb ram? I have excessive slowness on a 2Ghz Athlon XP with 1gb of Ram (depending on what I'm doing of course)!
PointZero said:
I have a Thinkpad 770Z, which has a 233 MHz Pentium II processor and 128 MB of RAM. This is capable of running Windows XP SP2 without excessive lag.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I call BS on that one... the smallest hardware I've tried XP on was a PII 400MHz with 256MB, and it was horribly slow and unusable. Next to that the Kaiser is heaven. I can run 10 programs simultaneously without problem and actually would have no reason to complain about it as a mobile device.
As DavidMc0 said, the architectures have nothing in common. Why does a 2GHz core 2 duo beat a 3.5GHz P4 hands down? There's not the same inside. Frequency can only consistently be compared in the same processor type.
I have been repairing and building various computers for about 10 years and i'll tell you that running windows xp with a 233mhz is nonsense. I actually installed windows xp on a customer of mine with a pentium 1 233mhz processor with 128mb of ram. That thing was insanely slow, everyway you look at it. The slowest processor you could run windows xp has to be at least a pentium 3 at above 500mhz. And yes, i even did benchmark, a 2ghz core 2 duo will beat my old 3ghz pentium D all day long.
Yes..that is not a fair comparision...compare apples with apples..by the way this test has already been done....( i.e Kaiser versus other smartphones) in the market...and Kaiser passed the test ( number 1) in all tests.
It could jusst be your phone...i have no problem with my Kaiser..
Cheers.
tytn64 said:
Yes..that is not a fair comparision...compare apples with apples..by the way this test has already been done....( i.e Kaiser versus other smartphones) in the market...and Kaiser passed the test ( number 1) in all tests.
It could jusst be your phone...i have no problem with my Kaiser..
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The test results you write about sound interesting with kaiser coming first in all tests - can you post a link to them?
PointZero said:
It's been bugging me, how the Kaiser has a 400 MHz processor and 128 MB of RAM, yet still isn't quite that snappy. As a point of comparison, I have a Thinkpad 770Z, which has a 233 MHz Pentium II processor and 128 MB of RAM. This is capable of running Windows XP SP2 without excessive lag. The Kaiser runs a stripped down version of Windows, yet isn't quite up to par with an inferior machine, based on specs. Is this due to processor instruction sets or source code efficiency? Why is there such a disparity in performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is probably the greatest ideia i've ever seen (not!)
So.. you got you PentiumII. I'll not dwell into cache diferences... busses... etc... i'll just point this:
Given that the Pentium 1 needed a heatsink and a fan (normaly)... do you think you would be able to just HOLD your kaiser if it was running a intel cpu like that?
Think before you post...
He would, because the battery would already be empty before it had a chance to heat up that much
Not to forget the slot-mounted PII is bigger than a Kaiser on its own, and still needs a chipset, graphics controller, sound chip to actually serve a purpose
Hello everyone
I've been reading for a few days in this forum about the Motorola Razr i
I certainly found interesting articles but strangely I have found that very few refer to the Intel chip
just as I have been looking about the chip of "Motorola Razr i" and found a curious comment
"Medfield z2460 was meant to test the waters and is the reason why it was launched in india and not the US. Just a precursor to the medfield z2580. The z2580 and Clovertrail will be offered in dual core variants (not to mention quad core for clover trail) and will ditch the imagination technologies sgx 540 for an sgx 544 mp2 which runs 34 [email protected] mhz.
The sgx 540 gets 6.4 gfllops @400mhz . The adreno 225 runs at 24.5 [email protected] 400mhz and the tegra 3 (t30l or t33) gpu runs 13 [email protected] mhz. So being that 6.4gflops vs 24.5gflops is relative to 202% what do you think happens with 34 gflops vs 24.5 gflops? Plus the s4 is 103 mflops single threaded while medfield z2460 is 90 mflops single threaded on the cpu side. That's pretty close. Dual core comparison with sgx544 might actually be superior and at a higher process node (32nm vs 28nm), and that's with an in order instruction set vs ARM's out of order. I don't see how you get "x86 Atom has very slim chances when taking on Qualcomm’s ARM processors or any other new generation ARM mobile CPU from Samsung or Nvidia" with that info. Your talking a gpu and a core.
Come spring they go out of order, not to mention ditching 5 year old architecture for silvermont, 22nm process and inclusion of intel hd gpu with 40 to 80 gflops (depending on eu count) and you think there will be no competition? Even the apq8064 adreno 320 only has approx 40-45 gflops but that doesn't include the modem so higher tdp .
Maybe the exynos 5250 with mali [email protected] 68 gflops will be a threat given release schedule but still, nearly matching single threaded performance with the best chip on the market (and with 5 year old architecture), and beating every ARM chip to date in java script for a first try/test the waters offering? Swap a gpu and add a core and its game on. And adding new architecture, 22nm, out of order instruction and hd graphics and ARM might have a problem until 64 bit ARM v8."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My question is How true is this?
not publish the link to the site because I do not know if this is right in this forum.
I apologize for possible flaws in my English.
I'm having a super-smooth experience, so yeah, the hyper-threaded single-core chip is doing a very fine job compared to the ARM competitors.
But is it true that Intel will go out-of-order for their next architecture? Because the whole point behind Atom processors was to take advantage of Intel's advanced lithography and well tought architecture, then simplify it to make it consume much less energy (and go from out-of-order to in-order was one of those simplifications).
Well I always thought Intel smartphone chips were more powerful CPU wise but gpu wise its behind.
And christ you can quote all the figures you like but it doesn't mean it'll actually reach that. Its what the individual parts can achieve.
Put them into a phone and reduce the power consumption to an acceptable level = a lot less than quoted figures
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
So, i got curious and downloaded the "CPU z" application to have a look at my phones specs in detail. I found that my processor was the "4x ARM Cortex A7 @1.19Ghz". however the advertised processor is the "1.20GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 400" now, is this just a pre-manufacturing model name and I'm just being stupid or is something fishy going on here?
Also i find it odd that the actual processor in my device is clocked at 1.19 when i in fact was under the idea that it's a 1.20 clock speed. I'm sure it wouldn't make that much difference but still seem odd?
could someone put my mind at rest and tell me that I'm just being an amateur and to go back into my android noobie cave or can someone confirm that in fact something fishy is going down.
thanks!
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/400
Snapdragon 400 processor specs
CPU
Up to 1.7 GHz dual-core Krait 300 CPU or up to 1.6GHz quad-core ARM® Cortex™ A7 CPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And don't worry about the clock speed.
I hope this answers your question.
Abruzini said:
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/400
And don't worry about the clock speed.
I hope this answers your question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks ^_^