This newest built is from china therefore the language is not WWE but CHS.
For more information,
http://bbs.ivgappc.cn/viewthread.php?tid=20240&extra=page=1
I wondered that ff it can be ripped and cooked in WWE or not!!!
Panda2020
Is this for real ???
Is this final?
panda2020 said:
This newest built is from china therefore the language is not WWE but CHS.
For more information,
http://bbs.ivgappc.cn/viewthread.php?tid=20240&extra=page=1
I wondered that ff it can be ripped and cooked in WWE or not!!!
Panda2020
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This rom in Chinese,not wwe,no TouchFLO 3D.
drgopoos said:
Is this for real ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could be.
I tried 21500 already in the beginning of April. The menu reaction speed is fast, but ROM is not stable enough...
The number jump is too big to believe....
There were few roms with similar numbers from china, but all have turned out to be fake.
THe latest on in the forum is 21234... I think that has a release date early may. So 21501 ???????
If I recall HTC and MS have different builds so this could just be a HTC build.
drgopoos said:
The number jump is too big to believe....
There were few roms with similar numbers from china, but all have turned out to be fake.
THe latest on in the forum is 21234... I think that has a release date early may. So 21501 ???????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Da_G:
OK, here's some new knowledge to pass on after examining 21602:
212xx branch is "CR50AKU1"
215xx branch is "CR50SAM1"
216xx branch is "CR50HTC1"
Given what I already know about 212xx builds past 21215 being final, and 216xx being HTC's branch, it becomes obvious that 215xx is SAMsung's branch
Further, 216xx appears to be based on a prior build to 21215, it still has beta reminders, timebomb, etc. Not sure this build is worth the trouble of dumping as a result.
taiseer999 said:
Da_G:
OK, here's some new knowledge to pass on after examining 21602:
212xx branch is "CR50AKU1"
215xx branch is "CR50SAM1"
216xx branch is "CR50HTC1"
Given what I already know about 212xx builds past 21215 being final, and 216xx being HTC's branch, it becomes obvious that 215xx is SAMsung's branch
Further, 216xx appears to be based on a prior build to 21215, it still has beta reminders, timebomb, etc. Not sure this build is worth the trouble of dumping as a result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This makes a clear sense to me
Thanks for the info....
Related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhiYQwCIVdI
is any rom for xperia already using this sort of tabs?
i think this solution is interesting.
infazz said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhiYQwCIVdI
is any rom for xperia already using this sort of tabs?
i think this solution is interesting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's an old build :-s
Recent builds are 23xx now
That's two different branches - both are recent.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=526738
Here's a link to a kitchen containing build 21928, similar to 21925 but newer.
Did OEMs develop diffrent WM6.5 Versions?
Wheres the 21xxx build and 23xxx from?
Dadaism said:
Did OEMs develop diffrent WM6.5 Versions?
Wheres the 21xxx build and 23xxx from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 23*** COM3 tree builds towards the 6.5 release, while the 219** tree builds towards a more finderfriendly UI not released with 6.5 but later with 6.5.1.
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/61352/windows-mobile-krijgt-met-versie-651-weer-nieuwe-interface.html (in Dutch)
http://www.modaco.com/content/windows-mobile-news/290431/wm6-5-1/
Maybe thats a old one.
Aah cool
I didn't know that..
But...Why are there different versions?
It doesn't make any sense..At least to me ?? :-s
Does anyone has an idea when WM 6.5 goes gold (is final)?
Or are these recent builds already the final versions?
I do know that the gestures can already be used in build 21815 (maybe even earlier). It just doesn't show it.
Try it when you see a tab underneath, move from right to left to jump to the next tab
Is build 23016 the last one without enlarged (fingerfriendly?) stuff or are there going to be other builds too?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=546765
Diagrafeas said:
Is build 23016 the last one without enlarged (fingerfriendly?) stuff or are there going to be other builds too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In other words....yes. Although I saw 23017 in some ROMs, but haven't tried that build so don't know if it is without fingerfriendly stuff.
ROM WM6.5V_03
(Core 23509)Manila2.1 HTC TouchHD
CE OS 5.2.23509 Build 23509.5.5.03
With permission from PDA-viet forum
Download
See post 18.
Thx for info on very expected 23506 ROM with Manila 2.5
Many thx,
but would you have more info on that ROM?
Any feed-backs at all? More picts?
Apps included? Limitations?
HTC messaging working? etc.
Much appreciate your time on sharing this.
Rgds, hangloose59
ringtone problem
Ringtone problem again
Any solution
thanks
position not fixed on homecreen! besides good rom, congrats. fast and stable.
powerdete said:
position not fixed on homecreen! besides good rom, congrats. fast and stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you need to install this file
Place .exe on windows startup folder
after restart once than it will be fixed
I am using this rom now and i can say its really good one
ram usage after SR is 46%
So far i didnt find any bugs
ps: i have downloaded this rom yesterday from pdaviet site
rambo12345 said:
you need to install this file
Place .exe on windows startup folder
after restart once than it will be fixed
I am using this rom now and i can say its really good one
ram usage after SR is 46%
So far i didnt find any bugs
ps: i have downloaded this rom yesterday from pdaviet site
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can also install the application called enatives ( see my signature). In addition this will also give the option of close on tap, which is very useful.
I have not found any major bugs yet. Very stable and speed is comparable to few of the other fast roms out here.
has anyone the amazing background from homescreen?
Very Very nice rom
only needs to fix manila postion, thats the only bug after 4 hours usage
New version is out.
BLACKSTONE-PDAVIET ROM WM6.5_V02 (Core 23089)M2.1
ROM WM6.5V02 (Core 23089)Manila2.1 CHO HTC TouchHD
CE OS 5.2.23089 Build 23089.5.0.02
Here is the link
http://pdaviet.123viet.net/DakMil/HD_23089_V02_M2.1.rar
New version is out.
BLACKSTONE-PDAVIET ROM WM6.5_V02 (Core 23089)M2.1
ROM WM6.5V02 (Core 23089)Manila2.1 CHO HTC TouchHD
CE OS 5.2.23089 Build 23089.5.0.02
Here is the link
http://pdaviet.123viet.net/DakMil/HD_23089_V02_M2.1.rar
Just curious as to why this thread was started? There is already a thread for this chef located here...
Blackstone Rom by T2M
Pandemoniumone said:
Just curious as to why this thread was started? There is already a thread for this chef located here...
Blackstone Rom by T2M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think both are by different authors...
drgopoos said:
I think both are by different authors...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, you're absolutely correct I saw the second version release and it looked the same as T2M's.
Looking forward to testing this one out!!!
Pandemoniumone said:
My bad, you're absolutely correct I saw the second version release and it looked the same as T2M's.
Looking forward to testing this one out!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All these roms are based on PQs kitchen
drgopoos said:
All these roms are based on PQs kitchen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it seems ever since PhamQuang released his kitchen the PDAvite site has a lot of chefs releasing Roms based on his work. I've already tested quite a few myself, good Roms.
Yes, nice to see a number of new chef's emerging, especially since a few chefs have moved on to other devices. So far all roms based on PQ appear to be good roms
Ringtone problem
* There is a ringtone problem.
* Can´t use 24 hours format
Thanks, It is a nice ROM.
V03 Online
New version is online from NOV 19th...
ROM WM6.5V_03
(Core 23509)Manila2.1 HTC TouchHD
CE OS 5.2.23509 Build 23509.5.5.03
Storage Card Unrecognized
Had an issue with this version not recognizing my SD card, first I've dealt with this. Was unable to rectify the problem so I'm back on PhamQuang's Rom for now.
v04, v05 online
v04 Manila 2.5 (Core 23612) and v05 Manila 2.5 (Core 21882) are Online at PDAViet's site...
http://www.pdaviet.net/showthread.php?t=75280&highlight=PhamQuang
any cook make this dish yet ?
looking for the newest 6.5.3.3 version 23517 (it's very stable !) but I would like it served with the manilla 2.1 (can't stand the 2.5)
anyone made this already ?
I guess you should learn how to cook! LOL
ai6908 said:
I guess you should learn how to cook! LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I WISH I KNEW HOW !
anyone know of such a ROM ?
What's so good about 23517 compared to, say, 28011 or 21885 ? I'm running a 28011 ROM and it's very stable.
Tourist! said:
any cook make this dish yet ?
looking for the newest 6.5.3.3 version 23517 (it's very stable !) but I would like it served with the manilla 2.1 (can't stand the 2.5)
anyone made this already ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
23517 is wm 6.5.1
280xx is wm 6.5.3 and
282xx is wm 6.5.3.3
Tourist! said:
any cook make this dish yet ?
looking for the newest 6.5.3.3 version 23517 (it's very stable !) but I would like it served with the manilla 2.1 (can't stand the 2.5)
anyone made this already ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check my thread tonight for 23518. Youll haveto do a bit of tweaking since mines preset for ATT Im sure some others will play with it too.
and that is com 5 branch
6.5.5
23517.5.5.0
aruppenthal said:
Check my thread tonight for 23518. Youll haveto do a bit of tweaking since mines preset for ATT Im sure some others will play with it too.
and that is com 5 branch
6.5.5
23517.5.5.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But 28011 reports itself as "28011.5.5.0", I don't think it's the same branch as 23517, is it ?
steviewevie said:
What's so good about 23517 compared to, say, 28011 or 21885 ? I'm running a 28011 ROM and it's very stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually - I was comparing the 23517 to the 282XX which was VERY unstable for me.
28011 & 21885 are fine
only I was sure 23517 is newer (like 282XX) but more stable (unlike 282XX) - or am I wrong ?
Yep agent did it!
I haven't tested that one but it's available...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=569507
dodsin said:
I haven't tested that one but it's available...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=569507
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is M2.5. He asked for M2.1 with WM6.5.x.x builds.
Agent made one referred as TR.23517.
Hey Hey people!!!
Haven't posted in this section for quite a while!!
Found this and thought it might come useful!!
Branches of WM Development: Here is what all these different version numbers relate to, and a summary of their features.
212xx = AKU1, all builds leading up to and including WM 6.5
213xx = MOT motorola
214xx = ???
215xx = SAM samsung
216xx = HTC htc
217xx = COM1, continuing dev of 6.5.0.1 - 6.5.0.40
218xx = COM2, continuing dev of 6.5.0.50
219xx = MD, feature test branch, pretty much dead now. (unstable features are added here, this tree is based on COM1, so older base OS code, but the UI/UX code is newer)
22xxx = SEMC sony ericsson
*230xx = COM3, continuing development
*234xx = COM4, appears to be abandoned.
*235xx = COM5, more GUI changes here. New Outlook Interface.
*236xx = LG Electronics Branch
*24xxx = Possible HTC branch
*25xxx = SEMC - Sony Ericsson
*280xx, 282xx = WMD. This is a continuation of com3 from 23090. Most of the changes appear to be with IE
235xx is the only branch that has threaded email natively
There was 219xx about half year ago, with numbers ending about 21936 (or maybe 45 or about that). It was test branch, where new features (like... supernew, something like previous 230xx where appeared huge softkeybar etc) were added. This branch was dead, just as looks 234xx now.
But, there was also COM2, with numbers 218xx. Well it reached its maximum, 21899. But instead of making new number line, MS/HTC chose to use already used 219xx. Here is where the mess comes from
The WM version numbers are as follows:
216xx = 6.5.3
219xx = 6.5.0
220xx = 6.5.3
231xx = 6.5.3
235xx = 6.5.5
236xx = 6.5.3
246xx = 6.5.3
250xx = 6.5.3
282xx = 6.5.3
290xx = 6.5.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope this helps!!
Or you may already know about it.
21884 by Aeroflyluby is WM6.5.0
Am I right?
brewhoxs said:
21884 by Aeroflyluby is WM6.5.0
Am I right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Is that bad?
aeroflyluby said:
Yes. Is that bad?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, in facts it's WM6.5.0 Clean, Fast & Stable ROM I ever know for Himalaya than the others. It's recommended WM6.5 Clean, Fast & Stable ROM for Himalaya! Waiting WM6.5.3 or WM6.5.5 Clean, Fast & Stable ROM for Himalaya if it possible.
brewhoxs said:
No, in facts it's WM6.5.0 Clean, Fast & Stable ROM I ever know for Himalaya than the others. It's recommended WM6.5 Clean, Fast & Stable ROM for Himalaya! Waiting WM6.5.3 or WM6.5.5 Clean, Fast & Stable ROM for Himalaya if it possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're looking for clean and fast version of 6.5.3 you may try http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=824328
But you should install it as it is described there.
aeroflyluby said:
If you're looking for clean and fast version of 6.5.3 you may try http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=824328
But you should install it as it is described there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okey thanks Bro, WM6.5.0 21884 by Aeroflyluby is really more fine for my Himalaya.
It looks like I will wait WM6.5.5 Clean, Fast & Stable version for Himalaya