Database Develop

Impressive jbenchmark score with Garmin 1.Final and 3D drivers

These are the scores. Check out jbenchmark.com to compare them to some of the other java 3d capable devices out there.
JBenchmark 2.0 measures the graphical performance of second generation java enabled mobile devices which support the MIDP 2.0 specification. With five new tests:
1. Image manipulation
2. Text reading
3. Game scene (Sprites)
4. 3D transformations with shading
5. User interface
Score : 522
Image manipulation : 598
Text : 2097
Sprites, game scene : 572
3D transformation : 897
User interface : 60 (not sure yet why this is so poor)
JBenchmark 3D is our 3rd graphical benchmark and measures the 3D performance of mobile java (J2ME) devices.
It contains 4 subtests:
1. Triangle throughput
2. Texturing performance
3. Low Quality Gaming Scene for low capacity software based 3D engines
4. High Quality Gaming Scene for hardware 3D accelerated, top performance devices
JBenchmark3D High Quality : 309
JBenchmark3D Low Quality : 340
Triangle troughput : 61099
Fill rate : 4690
JBenchmark HD
Measures 3D rendering quality, not just performance
Uploads device rendered screenshot for easy visual inspection
High level gaming benchmark with complex skeletal animation and stunning lighting effects
Low level tests measure multi-texturing fill rate and textured triangle throughput
Gaming score: 203 (6.7 fps)
Smooth triangles : 80774
Textured triangles : 47475
Fill rate : 1229 kTexels
Bilinear filtering : 66% (Failure)
Trilinear filtering : Failed/Not supported
Sub-pixel precise perspective correction : 64% (Failure)
Z-buffer depth : 16bit (Success)
How I got my scores:
Installed Garmin 1.Final from here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=404276
Installed 3D drivers from http://www.htcclassaction.org
Installed Esmertec Jbed 3.1 with 3D and M3G capabilities from http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=2127317&postcount=65

JBenchmark Pro results
Test results CPU Subtests
Game Physics 483
XML parsing 245
ZIP compression 72
Shortest Route Search 89
Business math 322
Chess 82
Image Processing 90
Test results 2D Graphics Subtests
Business Charts 730 Frames
MIDP2 Game - MQ 1603 Frames
Map 931 Frames
MIDP2 Game - LQ 2265 Frames
MIDP2 Imaging - MQ 157 Frames
MIDP2 Imaging - HQ 157 Frames
MIDP1 Game 734 Frames
MIDP2 Game - HQ 1169 Frames
MIDP2 Imaging - LQ 169 Frames
Test results 3D Low Level Subtests
Sprites: Fill Rate 118 Frames
3D Rendering Quality: Bilinear Filter 67%
Scopes: OFF 85 Frames
3D Rendering Quality: Z-buffer Precision 99.9%
Lights: Ambient x 1 107268 Triangles/s
Sprites: Scaling 187 Frames
Lights: Parallel x 8 60274 Triangles/s
Texture Filter: NEAREST + NEAREST 85814 Triangles/s
Lights: Omni x 1 66404 Triangles/s
3D Rendering Quality: Sub Pixel Precision 60%
SkinnedMesh: Few Bones 298 Frames
Texture Size: 256x256 87857 Triangles/s
Texture Size: 512x512 86836 Triangles/s
Rendering 2D over 3D 64360 Triangles/s
3D Rendering Quality: Trilinear Filter 47%
Texture Size: 128x128 88879 Triangles/s
MorphingMesh 218 Frames
Picking: Mesh 92
Texture Filter: BASE + NEAREST 88879 Triangles/s
Texture Filter: NEAREST + LINEAR 87857 Triangles/s
Fill Rate: Single-textured, 4x1 983 kTexels/s
Texture Filter: BASE + LINEAR 86836 Triangles/s
Lights: Parallel x 2 70490 Triangles/s
3D Rendering Quality: Perspective Correction 96%
Texture Filter: LINEAR + NEAREST 84792 Triangles/s
Texture Filter: LINEAR + LINEAR 85814 Triangles/s
Lights: Spot x 1 69468 Triangles/s
Texture Size: 1024x1024 Failed / Not supported
Fill Rate: Multi-textured, 4x2 1413 kTexels/s
Scopes: ON 85 Frames
Lights: Parallel x 4 63339 Triangles/s
Picking: Sprites 529
Fill Rate: Multi-Textured, 2x2 1352 kTexels/s
Rendering 3D over 2D 63339 Triangles/s
Texture Size: 64x64 87857 Triangles/s
SkinnedMesh: Many Bones 196 Frames
Lights: Parallel x 1 70490 Triangles/s
Test results Composite Performance Subtests
Composite CarRace - HQ Failed / Not supported
Composite MIDP2 Game - HQ 918 Frames
Composite MIDP2 Game - LQ 1830 Frames
Photo Galery - LQ 578 Frames
Composite MIDP2 Game - MQ 1228 Frames
Composite M3G FPS - HQ Failed / Not supported
Photo Galery - HQ 370 Frames
Composite MIDP1 Game 570 Frames
Composite Business - HQ 376 Frames
Route planner 529 Frames
Photo Galery - MQ 505 Frames
Composite M3G FPS - MQ Failed / Not supported
Composite Business - MQ 614 Frames
Composite CarRace - MQ Failed / Not supported
Composite CarRace - LQ 360 Frames
Composite Business - LQ 1074 Frames
Composite M3G FPS - LQ 141 Frames
Test results 3D Graphics Subtests
M3G FPS - HQ Failed / Not supported
M3G FPS - MQ Failed / Not supported
M3G CarRace - MQ Failed / Not supported
M3G FPS - LQ 247 Frames
M3G CarRace - LQ 643 Frames
M3G CarRace - HQ Failed / Not supported
Test results User Experience
M3G loading 172
Image loading (PNG) 152
RMS read-write 174
JAR reading 1785
Image loading (JPG) 55
Audio - MIDI 90
Camera Shooting Speed Failed / Not supported
Video - 3GPP Failed / Not supported
Audio - MP3 Failed / Not supported

Better not make another separated thread with benchmarks... As I stated - I want to implement JBenchmark in future relase of my benchmark.

How can i geotagging about altitude.

hi ,all
my sex1's camera version is r3a(enable geo tagging)
this is jpg's exif source
GPSLatitude Ref = N
GPSLatitude = 36 Degrees 19 Minutes 3 Seconds
GPSLongitude Ref = E
GPSLongitude = 127 Degrees 22 Minutes 3 Seconds
GPSAltitude Ref = Sealevel
GPSAltitude = 0/1​
latitude and longitude ...good
but, GPSAltitude is 0meter
i want geotagging about altitude.
plz, help me.

GLBenchmark 2.5 ICS VS JB Nice

HTML:
GLBenchmark 2.5 Result Details ICS JB
Fill rate - Offscreen (1080p) : 395 MTexels/s 467 MTexels/s
Fill rate - Onscreen : 390 MTexels/s 435 MTexels/s
2.1 Egypt:
HTML:
Classic - Offscreen (1080p) : 3429 Frames (30.3 Fps) 3630 Frames (32.1 Fps)
Classic - Onscreen 5791 Frames (51.2 Fps) 5778 Frames (51.1 Fps)
2.5 Egypt HD:
HTML:
C24Z16 - Offscreen (1080p) : 950 Frames (8.4 Fps) 1187 Frames (10.5 Fps)
C24Z16 - Onscreen : 1315 Frames (11.6 Fps) 1748 Frames (15.5 Fps)
Fixed Timestep Offscreen(1080p) 155254 ms (7.3 Fps) 124146 ms (9.1 Fps)
Fixed Timestep - Onscreen : 116584 ms (9.7 Fps) 87471 ms (12.9 Fps)
Triangle throughput: Textured:
HTML:
Offscreen (1080p) : 29 MTriangles/s 43 MTriangles/s
Onscreen : 29 MTriangles/s 43 MTriangles/s
fragment lit - Offscreen (1080p): 26 MTriangles/s 27 MTriangles/s
fragment lit - Onscreen : 26 MTriangles/s 27 MTriangles/s
vertex lit - Offscreen (1080p): 22 MTriangles/s 28 MTriangles/s
vertex lit - Onscreen : 22 MTriangles/s 27 MTriangles/s
Impressive :victory:

future81 said:
HTML:
GLBenchmark 2.5 Result Details ICS JB
Fill rate - Offscreen (1080p) : 395 MTexels/s 467 MTexels/s
Fill rate - Onscreen : 390 MTexels/s 435 MTexels/s
2.1 Egypt:
HTML:
Classic - Offscreen (1080p) : 3429 Frames (30.3 Fps) 3630 Frames (32.1 Fps)
Classic - Onscreen 5791 Frames (51.2 Fps) 5778 Frames (51.1 Fps)
2.5 Egypt HD:
HTML:
C24Z16 - Offscreen (1080p) : 950 Frames (8.4 Fps) 1187 Frames (10.5 Fps)
C24Z16 - Onscreen : 1315 Frames (11.6 Fps) 1748 Frames (15.5 Fps)
Fixed Timestep Offscreen(1080p) 155254 ms (7.3 Fps) 124146 ms (9.1 Fps)
Fixed Timestep - Onscreen : 116584 ms (9.7 Fps) 87471 ms (12.9 Fps)
Triangle throughput: Textured:
HTML:
Offscreen (1080p) : 29 MTriangles/s 43 MTriangles/s
Onscreen : 29 MTriangles/s 43 MTriangles/s
fragment lit - Offscreen (1080p): 26 MTriangles/s 27 MTriangles/s
fragment lit - Onscreen : 26 MTriangles/s 27 MTriangles/s
vertex lit - Offscreen (1080p): 22 MTriangles/s 28 MTriangles/s
vertex lit - Onscreen : 22 MTriangles/s 27 MTriangles/s
Impressive :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impresive hahahahahahahahaha, Nexus 4 on GL 2.7 onscreen T-Rex gets 20fps and 4X gets cca. 5fps owned by 400% 400% Nvidia fail hahahahahaha impresive my as*...

i'm talking about the gain with the same hardware, its good to have this improvement - i used 2.5 because its what i've ICS results for - if any1 tested 2.7 on both its good to show if theres any improvement

I hate benchmarks. They mean f#ck all. Games still lag. v10d was best, but I CBA to backup 10gb of sdcard data just to flash it again. Also jellybean has some sexy features hope lg email me back with proper bootloader instructions for 234, only a custom rom can fix our issues.
Sent from my rooted P880

@non4 said:
I hate benchmarks. They mean f#ck all. Games still lag. v10d was best, but I CBA to backup 10gb of sdcard data just to flash it again. Also jellybean has some sexy features hope lg email me back with proper bootloader instructions for 234, only a custom rom can fix our issues.
Sent from my rooted P880
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AGBR rom seems not be the same as ANEU/DEU/... Maybe when it gets out you'll be able to unlock.

Vosetal said:
AGBR rom seems not be the same as ANEU/DEU/... Maybe when it gets out you'll be able to unlock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dunno, I can't even try because adb won't pickup my device in bootloader despite fastboot drivers being installed
Sent from my rooted P880

@non4 said:
Dunno, I can't even try because adb won't pickup my device in bootloader despite fastboot drivers being installed
Sent from my rooted P880
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do we have an officiall update for UK yet. ( Sorry for OT)

[Q] How to disable Settings -> bluetooth item or in BT settings enable/disable button

[Q] How to disable Settings -> bluetooth item or in BT settings enable/disable button
i want to disable bt operating in Settings, but i can't make it work, even i want to disable mBluetoothEnabler which in
/packages/apps/Settings/src/com/android/settings/bluetooth/BluetoothSettings.java, i can't hook it at all, is there any other method to make it work using Xposed, thanks!
@override
111 void addPreferencesForActivity() {
112 addPreferencesFromResource(R.xml.bluetooth_setting s);
113
114 Activity activity = getActivity();
115
116 Switch actionBarSwitch = new Switch(activity);
117
118 if (activity instanceof PreferenceActivity) {
119 PreferenceActivity preferenceActivity = (PreferenceActivity) activity;
120 if (preferenceActivity.onIsHidingHeaders() || !preferenceActivity.onIsMultiPane()) {
121 final int padding = activity.getResources().getDimensionPixelSize(
122 R.dimen.action_bar_switch_padding);
123 actionBarSwitch.setPaddingRelative(0, 0, padding, 0);
124 activity.getActionBar().setDisplayOptions(ActionBa r.DISPLAY_SHOW_CUSTOM,
125 ActionBar.DISPLAY_SHOW_CUSTOM);
126 activity.getActionBar().setCustomView(actionBarSwi tch, new ActionBar.LayoutParams(
127 ActionBar.LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT,
128 ActionBar.LayoutParams.WRAP_CONTENT,
129 Gravity.CENTER_VERTICAL | Gravity.END));
130 }
131 }
132
133 mBluetoothEnabler = new BluetoothEnabler(activity, actionBarSwitch);
134
135 setHasOptionsMenu(true);
136 }

Manually adjust brightness to maximum/peak brightness without being in sunlight?

(Please delete my previous similar thread)
Most modern phones won't reach peak brightness unless they are in direct sunlight (by the light sensor). The slider at maximum brightness isn't really the phone's peak brightness. The slider is "capped" unless one modifies it somehow (the idea is to protect one's eyes, save battery life etc...).
For example, on gsmarena the specs for the S23's display are: "1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak)".
So, the slider only brings the phone's display to 1200 nits, while the display's full capacity is actually 1750 nits.
I don't want "daddy Samsung" to decide when my phone can reach maximum brightness or not [even if it is to protect my eyes or save battery etc..].
So, how do I enable my phone [in any way necessary] so that I can manually adjust it to maximum/peak brightness via the slider, without being in sunlight

You can just manually play with the settings:
Code:
$ settings list system|grep bright
screen_auto_brightness_adj=0.0
screen_brightness=22
screen_brightness_float=0.08333588
screen_brightness_for_vr=86
screen_brightness_mode=0
$ settings put system screen_brightness 100
Many LCD screens (and eInk screens) use the venerable TI LM3630A chip as LED driver.
Just find under /sys/devices/platform/<somewhere I²C>
I just looked and my Moto G is using a AW99703 instead.

Renate said:
You can just manually play with the settings:
Code:
$ settings list system|grep bright
screen_auto_brightness_adj=0.0
screen_brightness=22
screen_brightness_float=0.08333588
screen_brightness_for_vr=86
screen_brightness_mode=0
$ settings put system screen_brightness 100
Many LCD screens (and eInk screens) use the venerable TI LM3630A chip as LED driver.
Just find under /sys/devices/platform/<somewhere I²C>
I just looked and my Moto G is using a AW99703 instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, interesting! But I'm in a bit over my head here...
Should I start by looking for a file named "TI LM3630A" somewhere within /sys/devices/platform/ ?

white-k said:
Should I start by looking for a file named "TI LM3630A" somewhere within /sys/devices/platform/ ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not that complicated:
You can manually set the brightness with similar settings command (note: brightness could go to 100 or 255 or anything).
You could write a tiny app that just used the Android Java Settings.
Of course you'd have to have <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.WRITE_SETTINGS"/> in your AndroidManifest.xml
You could interact with the Linux driver. You have to enumerate:
Code:
# cd /sys/class/backlight/
# ls -l
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 1971-12-21 10:12 warm -> ../../devices/soc/c1b6000.i2c/i2c-6/6-0038/backlight/warm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 1971-12-21 10:12 white -> ../../devices/soc/c1b6000.i2c/i2c-6/6-0038/backlight/white
# cd warm
# ls -l
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2023-06-17 09:04 actual_brightness
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2023-06-17 09:04 bl_power
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 4096 2023-06-17 09:03 brightness
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2023-06-17 09:04 device -> ../../../6-0038
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2023-06-17 09:04 max_brightness
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 2023-06-17 09:04 power
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2023-06-17 09:04 subsystem -> ../../../../../../../class/backlight
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2023-06-17 09:04 type
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 2023-06-17 09:04 uevent
If you alter this unilaterally you'll have to come up with some way to reconcile it with the settings.
You could interact directly over I²C to the chip itself, but you have to read the datasheet and know what all the numbers mean.
Code:
# ./lights
warm i2c-6 38
00 Control 06
01 Configuration 18
02 Boost Control 58
03 Brightness A 2f
04 Brightness B 6f
05 Current A 0a
06 Current B 0a
07 On/Off Ramp 0a
08 Run Ramp 0a
09 Interrupt Status 02
0a Interrupt Enable 00
0b Fault Status 00
0f Software Reset 00
12 PWM Out Low 00
13 PWM Out High 00
1f Revision 02
50 Filter Strength 00
white i2c-6 38
And you could fry stuff by writing the wrong numbers.
I did all this stuff for an app for my eInk device that uses two color temperatures of backlight. The stock controls were crap.
So I wrote my own that just used /sys/class/backlight/...
Oh, it could be that some limit is set in the DTB itself:
Code:
029260 [email protected] {
029270 compatible = "onyx,lm3630a";
02928c reg = < 0x38 >;
02929c status = "okay";
0292b0 lm3630-vdd-supply = < 0x18b >;
0292c0 lm3630,en_gpio = < 0xa1 0x4c 0x0 >;
0292d8 lm3630,bank_sel = < 0x6 >;
0292e8 lm3630,bank_swap = < 0x0 >;
0292f8 lm3630,linear_output = < 0x0 >;
029308 lm3630,max_current = < 0xa >;
029318 lm3630,default_brightness = < 0x0 >;
029328 lm3630,max_brightness = < 0xff >;
029338 lm3630,pwm_enable = < 0x0 >;
029348 }

Renate said:
It's not that complicated:
You can manually set the brightness with similar settings command (note: brightness could go to 100 or 255 or anything).
You could write a tiny app that just used the Android Java Settings.
Of course you'd have to have <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.WRITE_SETTINGS"/> in your AndroidManifest.xml
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, this is way beyond my comfort level. I'll ask my programmer friend if he can help me based on what you have written
Much appreciated!