Related
Guys,
Seems like there are lots of threads popping up with new 'packages'. I thought we should create a thread solely for the discussion of kernel hacks/patches so that we can separate the two:
For those of you who dont know, http://gitorious.org/linux-on-qualcomm-s-msm/linux-msm-xdadev is the repo were are working on.
Just to clarify, this topic is ONLY for discussion regarding Kernel patches. Thanks to vdelf's headset patch it seems sensible to focus on:
1. Backlight always on problem FIXED 01/05/10 (vdelf)
2. Battery Issue FIXED 11/05/10 (drlucky)
3. Camera
4. USB
5. GPS
Makes sense. Lets add USB to the list. While charging works, data transfer does not. Also USB might allow us to debug kernel/android on the x1 and that is what dev's always dream of
:suggestion: why not add the latest kernel as download in the 1st post if there is progress. So everyone know where to download the latest updates u ppl do
dexteral said:
:suggestion: why not add the latest kernel as download in the 1st post if there is progress. So everyone know where to download the latest updates u ppl do
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be great to do this, and stick it
@dexteral,
Anyone can checkout the kernel from the above repo I posted. To do what you require we would need to upload the Kernel everytime someone adds a patch...
vdelf said:
Makes sense. Lets add USB to the list. While charging works, data transfer does not. Also USB might allow us to debug kernel/android on the x1 and that is what dev's always dream of
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is data transfer even possible in haret? I mean how would system unmount sdcard if it's running from sdcard itself?
not fast data but normal will work
love it
vietdoan20062006
Hi, Lets add fm-radio to the list
Great idea ... otherwise we are creating such a mess with lots of different kernel versions in different threads.
If anyone is interested in compiling the kernel as well as the wifi modules, I have setup a VMWare debian appliance containing all necessary tools and scripts to compile everything. Since this is a few hundes MB, I haven't got a place to upload ... need to check this first. If you are interested, let me know.
@drlucky
Have you had a chance to look at the backlight issue? I am almost out of ideas
Can you post your modifications on the microp-module and what you found out until now?
_Sensible said:
Guys,
Seems like there are lots of threads popping up with new 'packages'. I thought we should create a thread solely for the discussion of kernel hacks/patches so that we can separate the two:
For those of you who dont know, http://gitorious.org/linux-on-qualcomm-s-msm/linux-msm-xdadev is the repo were are working on.
Just to clarify, this topic is ONLY for discussion regarding Kernel patches. Thanks to vdelf's headset patch it seems sensible to focus on:
1. Backlight always on problem
2. Battery Issue
3. Camera
4. USB
5. GPS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey could you post the steps involved for compiling the kernel i am able to comile the kernel but it is not running
Wich toolchain do you use? arm-2008q1 or arm-2009q3?
X1iser said:
Wich toolchain do you use? arm-2008q1 or arm-2009q3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
arm-2010q1
could u write all the commands used by you
the way i have written
Personally I'll start to see how to compile the kernel. Can you share the link to download arm-2010q1?
Have you read this post ?
X1iser said:
Personally I'll start to see how to compile the kernel. Can you share the link to download arm-2010q1?
Have you read this post ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.codesourcery.com/downloa...-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.bz2
but may be it is not the right one it has got 202 in it insted of 67
ya i read that post only
i was able to compile the kernel but it is giving some errors
_Sensible said:
@drlucky
Have you had a chance to look at the backlight issue? I am almost out of ideas
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, haven't had the time. Could you push your changes to the git repo, I will try to have a look at it this week ...
okay i tried to make the kernel bt following the guide above by fatsal...
but i got stuck at
make htckovsky_defconfig ARCH=arm
htckovsky_defconfig doesn't exist (in the new repo anyway, i believe)
any help? which defconfig to use? :S
drlucky said:
Sorry, haven't had the time. Could you push your changes to the git repo, I will try to have a look at it this week ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just played with the klt-driver a bit. I always get version 0x0000, which on a hero means "bootloader mode". I have tried to migrate the hero code, but with no luck. It seems that the microp-klt needs a "reset", which shoudl be done by using a magical GPIO (on hero: 76), but this doesn't currently work at all. Kernel boots up, but still gets no valuable version number.
Hey guys,
I know the dev scene is pretty bleak here. I already had the android 4.3 jellybean source code synced on my laptop, since I was creating builds for my Nexus.
I tried for the SP, but then I realized that there is no device tree present. I found one by Krabappel but it was incomplete (or atleast I think so). It refers to 2 other extract-files.sh, but for the life of me I can't figure out which ones.
I know there are a few devs here, so can one of them help me out here? How to I get the blobs for the phone?
If I get that going, we can start with an AOSP build and then keep adding stuff to it.
Let me know. \
Cheers! :good:
sarkar1990 said:
Hey guys,
I know the dev scene is pretty bleak here. I already had the android 4.3 jellybean source code synced on my laptop, since I was creating builds for my Nexus.
I tried for the SP, but then I realized that there is no device tree present. I found one by Krabappel but it was incomplete (or atleast I think so). It refers to 2 other extract-files.sh, but for the life of me I can't figure out which ones.
I know there are a few devs here, so can one of them help me out here? How to I get the blobs for the phone?
If I get that going, we can start with an AOSP build and then keep adding stuff to it.
Let me know. \
Cheers! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried building cm10.1 for the sp, but could not get past the kernel logo. Even the recovery didn't work.
If you want the blobs, I can upload them somewhere. I had extracted them from the current 4.1.2 implementation on the device.
the extract-files.sh are in the below repo
"repository": "android_device_sony_common",
"target_path": "device/sony/common"
I have tried to build the recoveryimage but I am getting problem in builting kernel.elf as normally it is in kernel.img
I have tried to both method building kernel and using zImage.
nil1511 said:
the extract-files.sh are in the below repo
"repository": "android_device_sony_common",
"target_path": "device/sony/common"
I have tried to build the recoveryimage but I am getting problem in builting kernel.elf as normally it is in kernel.img
I have tried to both method building kernel and using zImage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you try to convert the zimage to elf using the build tools?
Here's the link that you may try http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=43356450&postcount=2
eeehaw said:
I tried building cm10.1 for the sp, but could not get past the kernel logo. Even the recovery didn't work.
If you want the blobs, I can upload them somewhere. I had extracted them from the current 4.1.2 implementation on the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome. You can either upload them link me the git if its there
sarkar1990 said:
Did you try to convert the zimage to elf using the build tools?
Here's the link that you may try http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=43356450&postcount=2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean that i tried to make write device files from scratch
as given here
[link]http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Doc:_porting_intro[/link]
as on method 3 i tried using zImage as kernel as stated there.
but make recoveryimage fails
nil1511 said:
I mean that i tried to make write device files from scratch
as given here
[link]http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Doc:_porting_intro[/link]
as on method 3 i tried using zImage as kernel as stated there.
but make recoveryimage fails
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to learn. It would be best to clone the Doomlord git and then read the files and scripts that are present there. This will give you the knowledge you may need to proceed further.
the git for our processor msm8960t is already present on github. Also download the kernel sources and drivers provided by Sony themselves from their developerworld page
sarkar1990 said:
the git for our processor msm8960t is already present on github.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean the kernel sources or the cm / aosp sources ? Can you provide a link.
eeehaw said:
You mean the kernel sources or the cm / aosp sources ? Can you provide a link.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is the link
https://github.com/DooMLoRD/android_kernel_sony_msm8960t.git
eeehaw said:
I tried building cm10.1 for the sp, but could not get past the kernel logo. Even the recovery didn't work.
If you want the blobs, I can upload them somewhere. I had extracted them from the current 4.1.2 implementation on the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using the device tree: https://github.com/Krabappel2548/android_device_sony_huashan
I added CPU_TARGET_VARIANT according to JB 4.3 requirements. And loaded up the required gits.
But the thing is now I get an error:
Code:
Code:
make: *** No rule to make target `device/sony/huashan/zImage', needed by `out/target/product/huashan/kernel'. Stop.
Could you help me out a bit?
I recall CM10.1 needing a kernel build from scratch, along with building the ROM
"你看到了没? 爱让我流胆怯的泪..."
"Have you seen it? Love has made me cry cowardly tears..."
sarkar1990 said:
I am using the device tree: https://github.com/Krabappel2548/android_device_sony_huashan
I added CPU_TARGET_VARIANT according to JB 4.3 requirements. And loaded up the required gits.
But the thing is now I get an error:
Code:
Code:
make: *** No rule to make target `device/sony/huashan/zImage', needed by `out/target/product/huashan/kernel'. Stop.
Could you help me out a bit?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did not use krabappel's device files. I had based my stuff on the Xperia T. I'll try this probably tonight.
eeehaw said:
I did not use krabappel's device files. I had based my stuff on the Xperia T. I'll try this probably tonight.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you push your device file on github
nil1511 said:
Can you push your device file on github
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm behind a very nasty proxy which makes it super hard to push/pull files from github. Instead of pulling i just download the zip archives.
I'll check out ways to push files though.
eeehaw said:
I'm behind a very nasty proxy which makes it super hard to push/pull files from github. Instead of pulling i just download the zip archives.
I'll check out ways to push files though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man, I keep running into the error! Ahh.. I think we need a better device tree.
sarkar1990 said:
Man, I keep running into the error! Ahh.. I think we need a better device tree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try getting the yuga tree, and change yuga to huashan, and fusion3 to viskan wherever possible.
This should not be straightforward. You will have to make some tweaks also.
That *might* work.
CallMeVentus said:
I recall CM10.1 needing a kernel build from scratch, along with building the ROM
"你看到了没? 爱让我流胆怯的泪..."
"Have you seen it? Love has made me cry cowardly tears..."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean coping the kernel sources files to kernel/sony/huashan right ? I did the same thing.
eeehaw said:
Try getting the yuga tree, and change yuga to huashan, and fusion3 to viskan wherever possible.
This should not be straightforward. You will have to make some tweaks also.
That *might* work.
You mean coping the kernel sources files to kernel/sony/huashan right ? I did the same thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm....and did you define the kernel building path in the boardconfig.mk?
"你看到了没? 爱让我流胆怯的泪..."
"Have you seen it? Love has made me cry cowardly tears..."
CallMeVentus said:
Hmm....and did you define the kernel building path in the boardconfig.mk?
"你看到了没? 爱让我流胆怯的泪..."
"Have you seen it? Love has made me cry cowardly tears..."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes. The kernel was getting built. I was able to see a boot logo on the screen. FreeXperia/Sony logo in this case. And then it would hang. Once I got a bootloop. I was messing around with the ramdisk to see if any hacks get it working.
eeehaw said:
yes. The kernel was getting built. I was able to see a boot logo on the screen. FreeXperia/Sony logo in this case. And then it would hang. Once I got a bootloop. I was messing around with the ramdisk to see if any hacks get it working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you implement the changes needed for a CM kernel from its stock sources? I'm not sure of the changes, though. Each kernel differs.
"你看到了没? 爱让我流胆怯的泪..."
"Have you seen it? Love has made me cry cowardly tears..."
CallMeVentus said:
Did you implement the changes needed for a CM kernel from its stock sources? I'm not sure of the changes, though. Each kernel differs.
"你看到了没? 爱让我流胆怯的泪..."
"Have you seen it? Love has made me cry cowardly tears..."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. I knew there were changes but I never knew what they were ? I asked a few people in a few threads but was not able to decipher.
Do you have any idea what sort of changes are required. ?
UnityROM-2 v.2.5.0
*****Discontinued.... No way to test actively till I have a functional build.*****
HTC One M7 Sprint Edition ( m7spr )
Development Section...
Want to contribute to the project or become team member?
Contact Me by PM here or leave a post detailing what you can and are willing to do for the projects' advancement.
My Github: https://github.com/LiquidSmokeX64
All current project sources can be found there .
ALSO MY FOOL-PROOF BUILD GUIDE & SCRIPTS ARE THERE FOR THOSE TOO IMPATIENT TO WAIT FOR MY NEXT RELEASE .
**Sources current as of version 2.5.0**
**10/06/2014**
Direct link to guide:
https://github.com/LiquidSmokeX64/Guides-Scripts
Note: Noob Friendly. If you're new to building ROMs or have never done it at all. I will help for as long as you maintain civility and focus on the project goals.
Installation errors out. Here is a pastebin of log saved after error
http://pastebin.com/fz15gwwn
Edit: I was able to install after removing that set perm line from updater. I will let ya know how it goes.
gruesomewolf said:
Installation errors out. Here is a pastebin of log saved after error
http://pastebin.com/fz15gwwn
Edit: I was able to install after removing that set perm line from updater. I will let ya know how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. I just removed it too. My bad adaptation from Evo LTE. Nothing too bad luckily.
Reuploading the fixed version now.
LiquidSmokeX64 said:
Ok. I just removed it too. My bad adaptation from Evo LTE. Nothing too bad luckily.
Reuploading the fixed version now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems to be running very well, once I got past that installation error....
Nice and smooth, especially with my aosp kernel...
gruesomewolf said:
Seems to be running very well, once I got past that installation error....
Nice and smooth, especially with my aosp kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So. You're a kernel dev... Got a question for you. How do I add more CFLAGS to the makefile without it not booting or whatever? I've tried adding -O3 to the 2 places I know to put CFLAGS. Same place I put the -w so it would work with GCC 4.8
gruesomewolf said:
Seems to be running very well, once I got past that installation error....
Nice and smooth, especially with my aosp kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will you be releasing this kernel for the Evo 4G? [emoji14] Evo4gnoob here
LiquidSmokeX64 said:
So. You're a kernel dev... Got a question for you. How do I add more CFLAGS to the makefile without it not booting or whatever? I've tried adding -O3 to the 2 places I know to put CFLAGS. Same place I put the -w so it would work with GCC 4.8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't say Im a kernel dev....more of a dabler...lol. I sent you a pm with my makefile so you can see adjustments I made for my kernels latest build (not yet publicly released)
Notorious said:
Will you be releasing this kernel for the Evo 4G? [emoji14] Evo4gnoob here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm....no I dont have any plans for that ATM
gruesomewolf said:
I wouldn't say Im a kernel dev....more of a dabler...lol. I sent you a pm with my makefile so you can see adjustments I made for my kernels latest build (not yet publicly released)
Umm....no I dont have any plans for that ATM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was joking lol
Notorious said:
Was joking lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're allowing the integration of it? Just to be clear.
So I'm not sure why but the kernel borked again. Maybe I need to go through one flag at a time? Or maybe forgot something....?
gruesomewolf said:
Seems to be running very well, once I got past that installation error....
Nice and smooth, especially with my aosp kernel...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey. Im having nothing but issues building it in the ROM so I was curious if you could tell me what I need to do after copying the msm8960 folder to a new place and adding in the makefile changes? Ive never built a kernel independently before but would like it to be a boot.img like normal so I can just replace the one in the ROM zip with the new one. Im sure it's pretty easy, just figured I'd ask you rather than comb through 80 guides saying different stuff lol.
LiquidSmokeX64 said:
Hey. Im having nothing but issues building it in the ROM so I was curious if you could tell me what I need to do after copying the msm8960 folder to a new place and adding in the makefile changes? Ive never built a kernel independently before but would like it to be a boot.img like normal so I can just replace the one in the ROM zip with the new one. Im sure it's pretty easy, just figured I'd ask you rather than comb through 80 guides saying different stuff lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you pm me with more info. Exact process of building, errors during build, any changes made to source, etc.
I'm gonna download your source later, together we should be able to figure this out.
gruesomewolf said:
Could you pm me with more info. Exact process of building, errors during build, any changes made to source, etc.
I'm gonna download your source later, together we should be able to figure this out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not seeing errors. Hell I removed everything but the -O3 spots and it still refused to boot. I dont know what the deal is....
Anytim I do ANYTHING to the kernel its dead, no matter how stupid it is.
gruesomewolf said:
Could you pm me with more info. Exact process of building, errors during build, any changes made to source, etc.
I'm gonna download your source later, together we should be able to figure this out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BTW. The makefile is borked. And was curious if you knew how to build AOSP for this device? CM was pretty easy, I'd figure AOSP isn't too different. Then I can try to get Android L running once I have a working Android K to cross-reference to and make the version specific changes in device, kernel, vendor, qcom-common, and s4-common
LiquidSmokeX64 said:
So. You're a kernel dev... Got a question for you. How do I add more CFLAGS to the makefile without it not booting or whatever? I've tried adding -O3 to the 2 places I know to put CFLAGS. Same place I put the -w so it would work with GCC 4.8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When certain flags or 03 is added it creates a larger zImage. In order to compensate the boot.img needs needs modified, either by kernel installer or if baked in the rom hex edited. To change the ramdiskaddr.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
thicklizard said:
When certain flags or 03 is added it creates a larger zImage. In order to compensate the boot.img needs needs modified, either by kernel installer or if baked in the rom hex edited. To change the ramdiskaddr.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely correct. And to elaborate on this just a bit more. Since your source building here, you can actually adjust the ramdiskadd with the scripts, considering it uses mkbootimg commands to build the boot.img.
An additional line in your devices board config, to give it a new ramdiskaddr size. Then an additional line in the build folder factory_ramdisk.mk , to handle the command for a new ramdiskaddr size should do the trick.
As for your other question about building aosp. I'm afraid that would be beyond my area of expertise. You would have significantly modify aosp code to allow for caf. It would be much harder then building cm, cause cm already has all the adjustments needed for caf devices
thicklizard said:
When certain flags or 03 is added it creates a larger zImage. In order to compensate the boot.img needs needs modified, either by kernel installer or if baked in the rom hex edited. To change the ramdiskaddr.
Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gruesomewolf said:
Absolutely correct. And to elaborate on this just a bit more. Since your source building here, you can actually adjust the ramdiskadd with the scripts, considering it uses mkbootimg commands to build the boot.img.
An additional line in your devices board config, to give it a new ramdiskaddr size. Then an additional line in the build folder factory_ramdisk.mk , to handle the command for a new ramdiskaddr size should do the trick.
As for your other question about building aosp. I'm afraid that would be beyond my area of expertise. You would have significantly modify aosp code to allow for caf. It would be much harder then building cm, cause cm already has all the adjustments needed for caf devices
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read this and my eyes glaze over. But you are in good hands with these two helping you. :highfive:
Yeah I'm working on it guys. Read the integrated kernel building guide and trying that. But if I could just get it to build me the boot.IMG and get my ramdisk sizes and whatever I'm looking at where to edit it in the device/BoardConfig changed the defconfig to a custom one I made based off the original one from the working boot.IMG but changed the I/O scheduler & CPU governed defaults. Gave it a local name (UnityKernel-x.x.x) and am fighting its last issues. So if nothing else help building it independently might be the most useful now. So if nothing else I can push a new boot.img
My bad. It just says the boot partition size so I think I might be almost there
Mods delete this post please
Reserved
Reserved as well
It should really be titled Semaphore gamma. I'll dig up a few links from @stratosk's thread when I get to the comp.
xenyz said:
It should really be titled Semaphore gamma. I'll dig up a few links from @stratosk's thread when I get to the comp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get that it works for both but that's not the goal here bro
icu64 said:
i get that it works for both but that's not the goal here bro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, yeah it works for both, but credit where credit is due: it's @stratosk's Semaphore Gamma Interface included in the Mirage kernel.
Anyway, there is a Google docs spreadsheet with lots of gamma settings already in this section.
xenyz said:
Well, yeah it works for both, but credit where credit is due: it's @stratosk's Semaphore Gamma Interface included in the Mirage kernel.
Anyway, there is a Google docs spreadsheet with lots of gamma settings already in this section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1) and? We aren't using it for his kernel and the scripts have nothing to do with his kernel. Anyone that wants to know more will look at the source and see that its his anyway 2) yes I know about that spread sheet And again.... So? What does that have to do with scripts besides the fact that I'm going to pull values from there for it at some point but that won't be until later and proper thanks will be given 3) stop telling me how to run a thread I started. If you aren't going to help and you don't like how I'm doing it guess what? Ya don't have to use it. Not trying to be rude but you're getting annoying now you need to stop
icu64 said:
1) and? We aren't using it for his kernel and the scripts have nothing to do with his kernel. Anyone that wants to know more will look at the source and see that its his anyway 2) yes I know about that spread sheet And again.... So? What does that have to do with scripts besides the fact that I'm going to pull values from there for it at some point but that won't be until later and proper thanks will be given 3) stop telling me how to run a thread I started. If you aren't going to help and you don't like how I'm doing it guess what? Ya don't have to use it. Not trying to be rude but you're getting annoying now you need to stop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But you are using his interface, it's just manners and respect for the dev. Also, xenyz was just trying to help by pointing you to the spreadsheet, I don't understand the need for hostility really...
Mods close this thread please
Hi All,
I have been building permissive kernels for my own use for a while now, but the Note 5 kernel (both the "C" and "I" versions from Samsung open Source) is giving me fits. As you can see from my terminal output, I get through the creation of the image, the modules build fine, but when the firmware install makefile starts, I get an error I've never seen before, even if I have made no changes at all to the source code:
Code:
OBJCOPY arch/arm64/boot/Image
GZIP arch/arm64/boot/Image.gz
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 2 modules
CC net/ipv4/tcp_htcp.mod.o
LD [M] net/ipv4/tcp_htcp.ko
CC net/ipv4/tcp_westwood.mod.o
LD [M] net/ipv4/tcp_westwood.ko
[B]/home/parallels/ANDROID/KERNEL/920c_kernel/scripts/Makefile.fwinst:45: target `/lib/firmware/tsp_stm/stm_z1.fw' given more than once in the same rule[/B].
I have looked at the cited section code, but don't see anything obvious. I have also google searched for this error way too thoroughly and PM'd some who have successfully compiled this kernel, but alas...
I am running Ubuntu 14.04 via Parallels on a Macbook Pro running Yosemite. As noted above, I am compiling from the Samsung OpenvSource files for The 920I and have also tried the 920C version, as well. As for toolchains, I have tried the Android NDK aarch64 4.9 toolchain, linaro aarch64 4.9 and linaro aarch64 5.2, all to no avail. I have tried make clean, make mrproper, deleted .ccache, etc., as well as using/not using -jX.
Here is a link to a repo with the untouched source code: https://github.com/sk806/N5_Kernel.git
ANY HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!
Thanks!
Steve
sk806 said:
Hi All,
I have been building permissive kernels for my own use for a while now, but the Note 5 kernel (both the "C" and "I" versions from Samsung open Source) is giving me fits. As you can see from my terminal output, I get through the creation of the image, the modules build fine, but when the firmware install makefile starts, I get an error I've never seen before, even if I have made no changes at all to the source code:
Code:
OBJCOPY arch/arm64/boot/Image
GZIP arch/arm64/boot/Image.gz
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 2 modules
CC net/ipv4/tcp_htcp.mod.o
LD [M] net/ipv4/tcp_htcp.ko
CC net/ipv4/tcp_westwood.mod.o
LD [M] net/ipv4/tcp_westwood.ko
[B]/home/parallels/ANDROID/KERNEL/920c_kernel/scripts/Makefile.fwinst:45: target `/lib/firmware/tsp_stm/stm_z1.fw' given more than once in the same rule[/B].
I have looked at the cited section code, but don't see anything obvious. I have also google searched for this error way too thoroughly and PM'd some who have successfully compiled this kernel, but alas...
I am running Ubuntu 14.04 via Parallels on a Macbook Pro running Yosemite. As noted above, I am compiling from the Samsung OpenvSource files for The 920I and have also tried the 920C version, as well. As for toolchains, I have tried the Android NDK aarch64 4.9 toolchain, linaro aarch64 4.9 and linaro aarch64 5.2, all to no avail. I have tried make clean, make mrproper, deleted .ccache, etc., as well as using/not using -jX.
Here is a link to a repo with the untouched source code: https://github.com/sk806/N5_Kernel.git
ANY HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!
Thanks!
Steve
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is Samsung for ya. Maybe @g.lewarne could provide some insight
mikeyinid said:
That is Samsung for ya. Maybe @g.lewarne could provide some insight
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope so! Thanks.
It's weird, as i've gotten the same error on both a virtual box and parallels setup. I am going to try boot camping it and then I'm done, unless someone knows what is going on.
sk806 said:
I hope so! Thanks.
It's weird, as i've gotten the same error on both a virtual box and parallels setup. I am going to try boot camping it and then I'm done, unless someone knows what is going on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you resolved this issue? I am running into it too trying to compile S6 Kernel for 5.1.1
elesbb said:
Have you resolved this issue? I am running into it too trying to compile S6 Kernel for 5.1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't. I can get every kernel to compile for my current devices, except this one. Strange.
sk806 said:
I haven't. I can get every kernel to compile for my current devices, except this one. Strange.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is related to modules compiling from what I can gather. If I use Ktoonsez source, I don't get that error. However, I notice it doesn't compile any modules. I still get an Image in my boot directory. Do you? I think the kernel itself is safe to use. You could probably ignore this error.
You guys just need to read what the error exactly refers to and then search for it in your source.
Would have brought you to. ....
https://github.com/UpInTheAir/SM-N920/commit/ad77e0333fbdccf5e0e1485e5a65ae47a062b235
Easy
UpInTheAir said:
You guys just need to read what the error exactly refers to and then search for it in your source.
Would have brought you to. ....
https://github.com/UpInTheAir/SM-N920/commit/ad77e0333fbdccf5e0e1485e5a65ae47a062b235
Easy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have anything like that in my makefile.fwinst file. Here is what is at line 45, which is where terminal is telling me the error is at:
$(installed-fw): $(INSTALL_FW_PATH)/%: $(obj)/% | $(INSTALL_FW_PATH)/$$(dir %)
$(call cmd,install)
Here is the actual terminal error message:
/home/seth/S6-Kernel_Parent/Extracted_S6_Source/Kernel.tar/scripts/Makefile.fwinst:45: target `/lib/firmware/tsp_stm/stm_z1.fw' given more than once in the same rule.
So I'm confused.
EDIT: Nevermind I'm an idiot. I found it. Thank you so much!! Finally solved
UpInTheAir said:
You guys just need to read what the error exactly refers to and then search for it in your source.
Would have brought you to. ....
https://github.com/UpInTheAir/SM-N920/commit/ad77e0333fbdccf5e0e1485e5a65ae47a062b235
Easy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HA! I googled the error a million times and never saw your repo! I wasn't sure if removing "stm_z1.fw tsp_stm" from the makefile would screw anything up, but apparently it doesn't. Many thanks, sir!
It's odd that others have built with the same sources (920C, mainly, from what I have seen), and have not changed that section of the makefile, but still succeeded in their build. I wonder what it is about my setup that caused this error. Anyway, not an issue now. Thanks again.
Steve
sk806 said:
HA! I googled the error a million times and never saw your repo! I wasn't sure if removing "stm_z1.fw tsp_stm" from the makefile would screw anything up, but apparently it doesn't. Many thanks, sir!
It's odd that others have built with the same sources (920C, mainly, from what I have seen), and have not changed that section of the makefile, but still succeeded in their build. I wonder what it is about my setup that caused this error. Anyway, not an issue now. Thanks again.
Steve
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are others I've seen using my commit (no credit) and didn't cherry-pick keeping the history. I believe the Image still flashes with or without though
I am having the same issue can you explain what was the issue ?
UpInTheAir said:
You guys just need to read what the error exactly refers to and then search for it in your source.
Would have brought you to. ....
https://github.com/UpInTheAir/SM-N920/commit/ad77e0333fbdccf5e0e1485e5a65ae47a062b235
Easy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same problem as OP with my S6. This link would help me but it is broken. Can you please provide some info about the commit or another link or whatever?
elesbb said:
I don't have anything like that in my makefile.fwinst file. Here is what is at line 45, which is where terminal is telling me the error is at:
$(installed-fw): $(INSTALL_FW_PATH)/%: $(obj)/% | $(INSTALL_FW_PATH)/$$(dir %)
$(call cmd,install)
Here is the actual terminal error message:
/home/seth/S6-Kernel_Parent/Extracted_S6_Source/Kernel.tar/scripts/Makefile.fwinst:45: target `/lib/firmware/tsp_stm/stm_z1.fw' given more than once in the same rule.
So I'm confused.
EDIT: Nevermind I'm an idiot. I found it. Thank you so much!! Finally solved
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you tell me what you did? I have the same error and i cant fix it ????
minealex2244 said:
I have the same problem as OP with my S6. This link would help me but it is broken. Can you please provide some info about the commit or another link or whatever?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you figure it out?
EncryptedCurse said:
Did you figure it out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhm somehow. I used a script which ignored that error as your kernel image is already built and you shouldn't care about modules. But if you still want a fix then see my commit: https://github.com/minealex2244/AldeXus/commit/e89301766b3d251b285649a38ee4dea4f2871b99
This commit shows you what to remove (it may be the perfect fix or just an example of what you should do in your code).
Tell me if it helped.
Broken link
Hey, I'm having the same issue but I can't find your commit, could you please fix the link?. Thanks in advance.