Cureently i'm using Darkky's ROM 8.0 with Advanced Voodoo kernel v666.2. The present score is 1500 with lag fix. How to improve the scores further ??
why do you even want to get high score??? you can install another kernel to overlock processor
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Best method is to lie .
Quadrant scores are irrelevant and bear no relation to the speed of the phone since Eclair .
Reason lagfixed Eclair posted high scores . Far faster less laggy Froyo posts lower scores = Quadrant no test of Froyo .
jje
Related
Coming over from fascinate forums and just wondering how the benchmarks test change when we actually get some froyo. I know they don't matter but it helps show the overall boost in performance so anybody with linpack or quadrant if u don't care please post ur results. Thanks n advance. Don't flame me, this will give u cappy users a chance to brag
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Quadrant scores stay pretty close to the same, mid 900's to low 1000's, linpack clocks in between 13.5 and 15
As has been mentioned in many other threads, Quadrant scores are biased toward Snapdragon processors.
These benchmarks really don't mean anything from one phone to another, but within the same phone model it does give an idea of improvement..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
1842 Quadrant Score after OCLF on Froyo which is great compared to 900 before the fix
This is with RyanZA’s EXT2 Lagfix.
Full Quadrant: 1867 (Saw 67 FPS at one point) This is substantially lower than the 2.1 EXT4 Lagfix, but still twice as high as the stock score of 957. I know Quadrant really doesn’t mean anything.
Benchmark PI: 1445 MS
Linpak:
MFLOPS: 13.809
Time: 6.07 Seconds
Norm Res: 5.68
Precision: 2.22044
The "Billabond1 real life use" benchmark shows performance to be as good or better than 2.1. I went from cognition 2.1 w/ voodoo lagfix to cognition 2.2 w/ oclf. I would say that the performance is about the same, good, and the features in 2.2 make it totally worth the update.
On a fresh install of 2.2 I got 995 on my quadrant score.
When I finished rooting and putting on RyanZA's OCLF, my quadrant went up to 2105.
Never did a linpack
is there a way to get higher quadrant scores (faster lagfix)? I'm scoring around 1250 right now... Any way to get 2000+ with cognition?
Thanks in advance!
Rohan
Is your phone running fast? Do you have a lag? Quadrant scores are generally useless and inaccurate. That said if you want really high quadrant scores flash either perception or assonance, and tweak the ulf settings and overclock to the highest settings. Your phone will likely freeze up constantly but your quadrant scores will be amazing
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
So a few news sites are showing off the Quadrant score of the Nexus S running CM7: http://www.talkandroid.com/27099-nexus-s-scores-high-on-quadrant-benchmarks-running-cyanogenmod-7/
One thing I noticed is that the CPU Score is 5372. When I run Quadrant Advanced on my i9000 the CPU Score is only 1371. What has changed in CM7 that gives the Hummingbird processor so much more computational power and how do we get it on the SGS?
Think those guys just know what they are doing when it comes to Android unlike Samsung :/ lol
I'd be interested to see how the stock Nexus S firmware does in the same benchmark. I don't care about the overall Quadrant score, just the cpu part. I wish we could have CM on SGS
I have read many threads and there someone says something about they have got easy 2000-3000 score in quadrant.I have tested everything and i have get max 2300 scores with super optimized kernel and 1400mhz oc with xjpu.Now i tried with darky 9.3 final and newest super optimized kernel and oc i get only 2200 score.
What i have done wrong?Can someone tell all tweaks and lagfixes what do you use for high scores and smooth galaxy =)
vellubbb said:
I have read many threads and there someone says something about they have got easy 2000-3000 score in quadrant.I have tested everything and i have get max 2300 scores with super optimized kernel and 1400mhz oc with xjpu.Now i tried with darky 9.3 final and newest super optimized kernel and oc i get only 2200 score.
What i have done wrong?Can someone tell all tweaks and lagfixes what do you use for high scores and smooth galaxy =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 69000!!! But but but with my laptop (keep in mind' it's a phone, not a bench toy)
What's the point of getting super duper high quadrant scores if your battery will last but 2 hrs, and you not being able to use your phone as a, well, phone
vellubbb said:
I have read many threads and there someone says something about they have got easy 2000-3000 score in quadrant.I have tested everything and i have get max 2300 scores with super optimized kernel and 1400mhz oc with xjpu.Now i tried with darky 9.3 final and newest super optimized kernel and oc i get only 2200 score.
What i have done wrong?Can someone tell all tweaks and lagfixes what do you use for high scores and smooth galaxy =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what u looking for smothness or fast response?i seen app in darkys rom which make yr phone smoth or if u vant fast respond it give you fast
Open the App 'SpareParts'
> Window Animations >> Very Slow
> Transition Animations >> Very Slow
This looks like butter! So smooth
and if you want fast repond then you do fast or something like this you download and try,may be it will solve your problem
vellubbb said:
I have read many threads and there someone says something about they have got easy 2000-3000 score in quadrant.I have tested everything and i have get max 2300 scores with super optimized kernel and 1400mhz oc with xjpu.Now i tried with darky 9.3 final and newest super optimized kernel and oc i get only 2200 score.
What i have done wrong?Can someone tell all tweaks and lagfixes what do you use for high scores and smooth galaxy =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you interested in running ACTUAL applications, or are you interested in testing quadrant. Because Quadrant is a testing tool, not an indication of real world performance for the apps you run.
No,i want it is fast ,because now some applications can open more than 10sec.And my galaxy s freeze sometimes.And if i install aplications it will lag for 10-20sec.
No,i want it is fast ,because now some applications can open more than 10sec.And my galaxy s freeze sometimes.And if i install aplications it will lag for 10-20sec.
Ignore Quadrant score it cannot measure the SGS . 1500 is the score on my super smooth non laggy phone .
Wipe phone i would even suggest you go back to stock to clear all the bits left over .
Build your own rom from the rom kitchin and ignore Quadrant and any other benchmarks use the phone .
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=817703
jje
Hi guys!
can you post your SGS configuration and tell us how do you score with Quadrant Benchmark?
mine is that:
SGS i9000m
kernel speedmod 13c - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with no OC Lagfix ---> 1800
kernel speedmod 13c - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with 1.2ghz OC Lagfix---> 2100
kernel super optimized - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with 1.2ghz OC Lagfix--->2350
kernel hacked Supercurio for GingerBread - rom Ultibread v1.4 Lagfix(no system) --->2000
yes, i'm a bench_maniac!
Stock I9000 XXJVK --> ~awesome scoreon my user experience benchmark.
Awesome... no words to describe!
Quadrant doesn't reflect real life performance at all. I used to get 2200+ with a lagfix on 2.1 but it was no where close to the real life performance of what I experience now on 2.3.3 JVK with no lagfix where Quadrant score is just 1020 .
Nice
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
quadrant doesn't reflect the actual user performance/experience because in the past i've had high quadrant scores but poor user experience.
but as the versions change (i.e eclair>froyo>gingerbread) i get lower scores but better user performance.
Agree my user experience benchmark is also off the scale .
Quadrant crap as always .
Why dont you post all these benchmark quadrant posts in the same place if you want to compare size.
jje
1200 on miui
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Mine is scoring "awesome" too in user experience!
I personally think this thread should be removed I'm afraid.. For starters, there are a billion other quadrant threads, and nobody has F***king bothered, as mentioned to collate the values into a table. Also, nothing is worse than breeding a culture of people who believe that Quadrant accurately measures the mobile performance for all workloads.
Auzy said:
I personally think this thread should be removed I'm afraid.. For starters, there are a billion other quadrant threads, and nobody has F***king bothered, as mentioned to collate the values into a table. Also, nothing is worse than breeding a culture of people who believe that Quadrant accurately measures the mobile performance for all workloads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with Ausy that this kind of thread is not of much practical use. I run Quadrant weekly, but only to compare my phone to itself as a diagnostic. If the Q score changes radically, I try to find out why. I also use it to compare ROMs.
However, I don't see that the benchmark scores of two different phones will tell you anything of much value when you compare them.