Can dal's newer .32 kernels work with phiremod 6.2? If so, can someone point to a post explaining how to upgrade uboot as this is supposed to be required for all his new kernels.
Thanks
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
No........
Related
I'm used to BLN in other ROM'S. CM7 used to have it, but the feature seems to be missing in the newer builds. Any way to get it back??
you can get that in a custom kernel... check the dev section for CM7 kernel's and see which one is best for you.
Glitch has bln, but not sure I'd working on new version, and only basic configuration available
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Hi all,
I have buy the O2X for a friend who start on Android.
We have install CM7 but I can't find any workable Kernel.
There is a kernel available ? (Volk one doesn't work too)
Or there is something that I have not understand ?
Thank you in advance.
Latest vorkkernel betas from irc should work fine.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using xda premium
Have you try it ?
At my side BOSD...
BSOD doesn't seem to be linked with kernel, if I believe Nightlies Thread. There is only VorkKernel for now to OC CM7.
Perhaps in a few days Horse Power Kernel will be adapted, follow its thread to be informed.
Kernel can sombody explain what it is for. can you update it as well i ama using cyanogenmode 7.1 as wel thanks and regards
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA App
Has anyone done an OC kernel for version 20c yet? Looking for a dev to make one to test if they would be so kind. I think this from is the best so far for my phone.
Sent from my modded a100 running ICS
teray0n said:
Has anyone done an OC kernel for version 20c yet? Looking for a dev to make one to test if they would be so kind. I think this from is the best so far for my phone.
Sent from my modded a100 running ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search.
There's plenty of kernels in the development forums
Sent from my CM7 Thrill
Bestiaginger kernel works for rooted 20c from rogers no issues and still great battery I have not had a rom work like this and I've tried all the rooms in the lg 3d forum.
So if you wanna go faster and smoother try this kernel. And I've also used v6 supercharger and kernelizer. This has been the best the phone has ever worked. So well that there is no lag and good mem usage now too since putting in the Bestiaginger kernal.
Sent from my LG-P925g using xda premium
Any links?
Sent from my LG-P925g using Tapatalk 2
Hi I'm new to the cappy forums and want to see what perks and such there are in the custom kernels, so I'm asking what custom kernel are you using ( if any) and why that one, is it because of features, stability, performance, etc.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
I mainly use Nick0703's Unofficial Semaphore because of Step OC and In-Call Volume settings.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2136767
For your Xylon 2.3.3. ROM use "sc" or "s_vc_c" version (with Voodoo Color).
Val D. said:
I mainly use Nick0703's Unofficial Semaphore because of Step OC and In-Call Volume settings.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2136767
For your Xylon 2.3.3. ROM use "sc" or "s_vc_c" version (with Voodoo Color).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly is the difference between sc, vc , c, and s?
At My main phone's forums (Samsung infuse 4g) we don't have any custom kernels yet, one is in the works but that's it so flashing custom kernels is kinda new for me, so any details would be great. Also I am very thankful that you added in which type I should be using for my install ROM, I flashed devils kernel to try out, and thinking about trying the dual boot one, but I want to find out add much add possible about the advantages and disadvantages of the different kernels before choosing a daily driver.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
Normal version "c" is for most ROMs, version "sc" is for Slim based ROMs. Your Xylon 2.3.3 runs better with "sc" version.
"vc" stands for Voodoo Colour mod. Download Voodoo Sound app from the market to have VS/VC control.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...rolapp&feature=nav_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwyLDNd
Which version of the unofficial semaphore should I use with the PAC MAN ROM?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
ih8legal said:
Which version of the unofficial semaphore should I use with the PAC MAN ROM?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
based off of the post above yours i would say "C" cuz if im not mistaken PAC is primarily CM Based, but i would wait for actual confirmation before proceeding
I don't remember what kernel version PAC uses, but just install the ROM and look what kernel it comes with. PAC ROM is ported by the same dev - Nick0703. Most likely the default kernel is already his Unofficial Semaphore, therefore no kernel change needed. PM him to confirm.
If you come from a CM ROM the kernel will stay the same.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
This is what the dev said
"You can use any version that you want. But if you're using the "s" version then you'll need to flash HugeMem libs also."
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
Hello. I'm hoping to use LagFix with my 32gb Nook HD+ on CM10.1.3, but want to make sure it's safe after seeing so many horror stories on these forums and elsewhere. My understanding is that SEM32G eMMCs are unaffected by the bricking bug and so LagFix should be safe to use. Is this correct?
Thank you!
EDIT: In case there are other's looking at this thread without the same eMMC- Is the rule of thumb that all non-Samsung eMMCs are safe to lagfix (trim)?
That's a Sandisk part, I believe. Mine also uses a Sandisk. I've been running CM 10.2 with the trim-enabled kernel for three weeks; 10.2 is based on android 4.3 which auto-schedules trim.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using XDA Premium HD app
rhyang said:
That's a Sandisk part, I believe. Mine also uses a Sandisk. I've been running CM 10.2 with the trim-enabled kernel for three weeks; 10.2 is based on android 4.3 which auto-schedules trim.
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The built-in trim function in 10.2 is equivalent to using LagFix in 10.1.3?