Thanks to all the hard work from all the developers on XDA:
I love my nook with a Quadrant score of 2539!!!
CM7 v85, OC at 1.2GHz, cleaned /system/apps
Everything works: NetFlix, various markets, Flash, Youtube in HD, etc
I have a picture of the Quadrant scores, but I'm not allowed to post links yet
I would post this in the General forum for future reference.
Thanks, I'll move it to the General Forum
I feel the new OC Kernel is pretty great and I love deep sleep. But I will always remember the 4/24 Kernel at 1300mhz, which got me scores of 2700 regularly ;p
That said, I get about 2300-2500 (depending on the sd card) now, and I don't mind taking the small hit for the much better battery life.
With the 424 kernel, I was getting like 2500-2700 normally at 1.3gHz
Now with the 523 at 1.2gHz:
I had one really low one at 1400 something, I was shocked.
My highest was 2513.
Averaging around 2300-2400 excluding that first test.
I Am Marino said:
With the 424 kernel, I was getting like 2500-2700 normally at 1.3gHz
Now with the 523 at 1.2gHz:
I had one really low one at 1400 something, I was shocked.
My highest was 2513.
Averaging around 2300-2400 excluding that first test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually had the same scare (1400) lol. But that was the first test back with beta 3.1 and with just the 925mhz.
Gin1212 said:
I actually had the same scare (1400) lol. But that was the first test back with beta 3.1 and with just the 925mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All tests were done with the exact same settings, so I was like what the hell is this.
I'm running Phiremod 6.2 with the 424 OC Kernel, and even though I'm too chicken to run at 1300, this thing just screams at 1200.
frook40 said:
Everything works: NetFlix, various markets, Flash, Youtube in HD, etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to derail, but how did you get Netflix working? Are you using the leaked APK, or just the website? When I try to stream from the website it gets an error.
Use the apk, test it and if it chipmunks, edit your build.prop.
A search will tell you all you need to know.
Related
Ok, so I've experimented a LOT with different ROMs, different kernels, different overclocking etc and I just CANNOT seem to break the 48.333 barrier. I've achieved this several times on CM6 nightly with Wildmonks 1190 kernel.
Tonight, I took a few different ROMs (Rods, CM6 & NAZTech Plain) and modified them removing anything that could drain resources such as Maps, Messenger, Voice Search, etc etc. I re-signed them, flashed them AND flashed Wildmonks experimental 1267 kernel (maxed JUST below because 1267 is an insta-freeze) and I STILL only achieved 48.333 max.
Any tips?
I mean, I'm happy with my phones everyday performance, I'm more or less just trying to clock a linpack score in the high 49's for S&G's.
(The linpack record for N1 is like 50, showing an overclock kernel of 1300 but I highly doubt that as I've never heard of an N1 achieving even 1267 without lockup)
my highest score was 47.6 I think, and for about 2 weeks I kept running linpack days and nights to attempt to get higher score
But after second week I gave up, I could get around 47.6 and no higher.
Anyone?
(10 characters)
uoY_redruM said:
Anyone?
(10 characters)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody at all can tell me how to achieve better scores?
1.267 was achieved by 'the jesus phone'
Mine was 41.01 with Stock Nexus One (Froyo)
Now (with the new version of Linpack) I can't get more than 34.9xx
b1337z0r said:
1.267 was achieved by 'the jesus phone'
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Jesus phone isn't even in the top ten for Nexus anymore. Check my signature. I hit 50.525 3x using Wildmonk 1267 kernel experimental. OC 1228 mhz stable. The highest for the N1 is 55 legit. Persian.
what is the ideal setup to achieve maximum mlops on the nexus?
1. Rom?
2. Kernel?
3. ?????
Why are benchmark scores so important?!
I find that just using my phone on a daily basis, being able to complete all the tasks I need, and do it with style & grace, is enough for me.
My Nexus still outperforms every single device amongst me and my friends.
I can do way more things, etc. etc. you all know this.
So why bother with trying to get the highest Linpack or Quadrant scores?!
BTW: I read a post the other night in which Cyanogen himself stated that cheating on benchmark scores was easy. so ... hhmm.
Because we can?
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
@uoY_redruM
How come I can only score around 36 on my Nexus One? I did full data wipe, cache and dalvik wipe. Then installed CM6 RC3 and wildmonks kernel 2.6.35_SVS-950mV_CFS_AXI_720p_1113MHz_081910. I've also installed SetCPU and overclocked to max of 1113. How can get this above 40?
Jesus' phone was fast, but not as fast as mine!
Love,
GOD
Linpack for Android Top 10
Results of the benchmark speed test for Android cell phones and devices. # Name MFLOPS ROM Notes
1 mtw4991 109.3 Nexus One 1113.6MHz google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRF91/43546:user/release-keys
2 Zeno/ dallas 78.643 Nexus One 998.4MHz google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRF91/43546:user/release-keys
3 Edub Chicago 53.194 PC36100 1190.4MHz sprint/htc_supersonic/supersonic/supersonic:2.2/FRF91/218634:user/release-keys
4 Saiy 52.759 Liberty 600.0MHz google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRF91/43546:user/release-keys
5 MachString 49.212 ADR6300 1190.4MHz google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRF91/43546:user/release-keys
6 br 48.333 ADR6300 google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRF91/43546:user/release-keys
7 br 48.333 ADR6300 google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRF91/43546:user/release-keys
8 Machstring 48.333 ADR6300 1190.4MHz google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRF91/43546:user/release-keys
9 Edub Chicago 47.932 PC36100 1190.4MHz sprint/htc_supersonic/supersonic/supersonic:2.2/FRF91/218634:user/release-keys
10 MachString 47.906 ADR6300 1190.4MHz google/passion/passion/mahimahi:2.2/FRF91/43546:user/release-keys
Don't trust in the top devices list.
It's too easy to cheat
I can show you if you want it and put any MFlops you want.
So here is my advice : Use linpack to improve your device, but never compare your results to other, that make no sense.
I wish greenecomputing can solve this, maybe I should contact them.
dmsr66 said:
Don't trust in the top devices list.
It's too easy to cheat
I can show you if you want it and put any MFlops you want.
So here is my advice : Use linpack to improve your device, but never compare your results to other, that make no sense.
I wish greenecomputing can solve this, maybe I should contact them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, you might be right, however this popped up while driving right after flashing CM6+Wildmonk's 1113 kernel and shocked the heck outta me It's real, not faked....probably inaccurate, but real.
No worries, I didn't mean yours is fake
I just wanted to warn people about the reliability of the list and tell them to use Linpack as a personal device benchmark (ie after a ROM update) and not like a competition because some results may be totally fake.
well i was getting same scores with stock froyo, so just wondering why when overclocked with WM kernel and using CM6, shouldn't it be improved??
I personally usually get about 36 I would love to get 45
Hey folks,
It was requested of me to make a thread regarding this. I have compiled an alternative kernel for aosp based roms. It should work with any of them.
1.0
All governors enabled, interactive patched in, conservative as default
Anticipatory scheduler vs. deadline ins stock cm6
Supports wired tethering
Latest source (may be newer than cm6?)
tun.ko support for vpn
More will be added later.
Thank you Koush, for providing me the fix for screen tearing and thanks sniffle, for helping me with making the kernel work with aosp
http://adrynalyne.us/files/kernels/cm6_ruby/
Source:
http://adrynalyne.us/files/kernels/cm6_ruby/source/
Nice job buddy! Thank you! I'll give it a shot tonight.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
oh hell yea.
maybe this will help all us aosp guys get a stable phone to use...
Just loaded it up. Will be back. To report.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
dnoyeb said:
oh hell yea.
maybe this will help all us aosp guys get a stable phone to use...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the plan
Any plans to get undervolt and oc?
Trying now, thanks...
Is there a place I can find the Stock CM6 kernal, in case I don't like this one? Ill report back in a little bit
Its slower than the CM6 kernal. I ran a linpack of 27 and quadrant of 1277. This was both running "performance" mode, and turning set cpu to the max which was 1000. I Am going to give it a try, maybe the battery life will make up for the performance loss. If not, nandroid here I come.
bradm23 said:
Trying now, thanks...
Is there a place I can find the Stock CM6 kernal, in case I don't like this one? Ill report back in a little bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ditto request backup stock cm6 kernel
I just hope it fixes my WiFi shutting off constantly.
Seems to be really solid, a bit slower than cm-6 but also took care my screen flicker and haven't found any negatives yet (1.0+ hr up time) . Looking forward to some overclock variations. Thanks for the work adrynalyne.
bradm23 said:
Its slower than the CM6 kernal. I ran a linpack of 27 and quadrant of 1277. This was both running "performance" mode, and turning set cpu to the max which was 1000. I Am going to give it a try, maybe the battery life will make up for the performance loss. If not, nandroid here I come.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what to tell you. The Sense version of this kernel has considerably better than that.
adrynalyne said:
Not sure what to tell you. The Sense version of this kernel has considerably better than that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.
bradm23 said:
I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?
unstable for me on 9/10 nightly wifi on and no setcpu, 3 random lockups/reboots in past 2 hrs
32.61 linpack and 1341 quadrant. Its not much slower than cm-6. @adrynalyn, do you plan on bumping up the clock speeds? Mine is showing 1000 max btw. Thanks again
I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It shows 1k for me too
Yeah I plan on some future bumps.
THANK YOU ADRYNALYNE!!!!!!!!!! I was so pumped when you told me you did this .
adrynalyne said:
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1k max for me as well. 998 didn't seem to be an option.
I'm getting similar performance as I get with kernels i compiled from koush's source where i only changed cpu speeds for overclocking and udervolting. Not as fast as koush's even when i bumped it up to 1.19Ghz. Which i couldn't figure out why since i used exact same source
Guys,
Looking for some feedback on stock ROM and Kernel 3G or Wifi Only Dell Streak 7 benchmark scores. I normally think benchmarks are pretty useless, but curious to verify a few things vs a custom kernel to ensure there's no performance losses vs the stock kernel. If there's no problems found, in a few days there will be a custom kernel with CIFS, TUN, etc available thanks to Mashi. Anyone interested in that, please help out with some benchmarks here. The kernel will be in another thread, just some sanity checking of performance here.
So far Quadrant Standard is about where I saw folks in another thread.. 1950ish. i didn't see in there where it broke down the 3D score, as I'm curious a bit about that.
Run it after a fresh boot, don't run it multiple times please.. I hear that really clouds the results because it's just running out of cache, etc..
AnTuTu score for my device is 4750. I'll break down the scores here to compare line by line, if people will help out there it'll be appreciated. Same with Quandrant, if you could run this one time after a fresh boot.
CPU Int: 1095
CPU Float: 982
2D: 411
3D: 1172
Database IO: 365
SD Card: 6.9 write, 9.4 read
There is already a thread like this (For noobs who don't know).
http://http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1189487
Duciousness said:
There is already a thread like this (For noobs who don't know).
http://http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1189487
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For one, nice URL fail. Second, that's for a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT DEVICE.
Get a clue.
Hey guys,
Posted under general questions and to my surprise not one reply in a week. So, I'm curious to know somethings about overclocking these tablets. What settings are you using? Have you had any issues with overheating and shutting down?What settings are recommended for web browsing, gaming etc? Let's talk linpack and benchmark testing. Where do you rank and how did you get there? Let's talk SetCPU benchmark scores, what kind of results can you squeeze out out of your device? How does someone pull off 41916.7 MFLOPS?! (Nexus) I'll start......
GT-7310 Running 3.2 / Motley Kernal / SetCPU
SetCPU Scores
Long Bench @ 178ms / Native @ 621.5ms
Linpack Scores
Single thread @ 42.4 MFLOPS / Multi thread @ 83.2 MFLOPS
Obtained running 1504MHz max / 216MHz min
Note: I have overheated and shutdown at 1504 web browsing. At 1400MHz I have had no issues. I see some scores are through the roof. I'm not to familiar with Overclocking and just would like to hear what you guys have to say. Thanks in advance. I may of posted this in the wrong area and I apologize. I would like this to be a thread on the topic rather than a Q & A.
Well I personally run my tab @1200Mhz with -25mV on the 1000&1200 steps, but anyhow, due to the interactive governor the most used setps are 216, 456 and 1200. I don't undervolt the lower test for stability reasons as I mostly work on the tablet so I don't want to test yet how low uV can go, don't have the time to test it right now. (Even though I'm pretty sure -25mV even on lower steps is still largely stable)
As for the set CPU test I tried them out on 1504Mhz: 150 and 595ms. I once pushed the tab to 1600Mhz but it ended up in an immediate freeze so I will skip on trying that again.
I don't have linpack but tried running GLBench 2.1 Egypt and the score was pretty embarrasing
Thanks for sharing. Since my post I have flashed aokp-34 galaxiansoup with v-3 of the Motley Kernal. Running 1400 on 216 no undervolting and am seeing a tiny increase in numbers. I'm still stumped on these linpack scores. This thing runs great. No complaints whatsoever. Anyone want to chime in on the best bench testing app or what the stock numbers on these 7310's are?
everyone will tell you that benchmark scores aren't very representative!
run the test 5 times and each time you will get a slightly different score.
i don't really care about benchmarking, as long as i feel that my tab runs smooth (which i think it does) im pretty happy. im normally at 1,4ghz and everything is smooth and stable!
Thanks for sharing. I couldn't agree more. My tab runs great at the same speed settings as yours. I just don't understand the numbers and how certain device's have like 100 times my mflops......I'm a numbers guy by nature, I like to see it on paper....but I am content with my device. Just always looking to make it cleaner and faster.....you know the addiction I'm sure.
Are you happy with this kernel? I found it stuttering and laggy...
zooster said:
Are you happy with this kernel? I found it stuttering and laggy...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I've not ran into any issues. Totally impressed and content with v3 motley. If there is a better kernel out there I'd love to hear about. I have yet to look, no need.
Been running a few custom profiles via Setcpu peaking @1.5GHz on B37 for a few weeks now. Other than a force close or two and an occasional browser freeze, which is normal with these roms, this thing is running pretty snappy. Gotta watch the temp though.
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda premium
I sure hope that you've set up your profiles so that your tab overclocks to 1.5Ghz only occasionally, it's a thing that you HW can handle it, but will it on the long term?
Also, I regret that you can't overclock the bus frequency to get an overall performance boost (the GPU could really use it..) as on the Galaxy S
Yeah, I'm only pushing 1.5 on occasion, per profile. I normally run 1.4 all day everyday for the last 3 months with heavy use and no issues. Just gotta watch the temp. I've had mine to 113 degrees which kinda scared me.
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda premium
So, i'm getting a really low 3D Mark score for a "gaming" device like this, i think that Nvidia do something wrong with the Tegra 3 GPU, i got it running at 650Mhz and i get like 3000 points... other devices on the same range get a lot better scores... what to do to get better 3D on our 4X?
Well this is my score...I'm not sure our much other devices get, but from the results our O4X is in the same range as the Note 2...so I guess that those results aren't that bad...
Btw I used the official CM10.1.0 rom with stock cm kernel...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
JAsko_san said:
Well this is my score...I'm not sure our much other devices get, but from the results our O4X is in the same range as the Note 2...so I guess that those results aren't that bad...
Btw I used the official CM10.1.0 rom with stock cm kernel...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think that is a better score that i do have with V20C and iodak kernel, i will try another kernel and compare...
DankoFGL said:
So, i'm getting a really low 3D Mark score for a "gaming" device like this, i think that Nvidia do something wrong with the Tegra 3 GPU, i got it running at 650Mhz and i get like 3000 points... other devices on the same range get a lot better scores... what to do to get better 3D on our 4X?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you running anything else? I ran at stock speeds (no overclock anything) and got 4100-4200 on five straight runs. I have no idea what a normal score for the Tegra 3 is supposed to be.
I get same result. My kernel nothing touched from defaults.
I think it is ok all tegra 3 devices get similar scores one x+ gets about 3800.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
for benchmarking, stock rom > aosp rom > cm based roms > other roms, from my experience. even when you bring custom kernels to the table, it's the same.
edit:
f.e., on quadrant, stock with custom kernels could go around 6100, aosp rom we have went to 5500, cm based went up to 4800, while others went up to 4500.
Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
DankoFGL said:
Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we have like four available kernels for stock, try all four and see which one runs the fastest. as for mc4, i could swear i saw people reporting playing that with no lag... strange
DankoFGL said:
Stock with what customs? Im using iodak is there a begter kernel? Mc4 lags as hell even at 520mhz gpu a 1600mhz cpu
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried uninstalling all these overclock softwares and testing without them?
Flying_Bear said:
we have like four available kernels for stock, try all four and see which one runs the fastest. as for mc4, i could swear i saw people reporting playing that with no lag... strange
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe the problem is that i use the full graphics modded APK... and not the tegra 3 that i bought via playstore... also, Dead space lags too... mabye a kernel related problem, i will flash the rom and kernel again and see...
DankoFGL said:
Maybe the problem is that i use the full graphics modded APK... and not the tegra 3 that i bought via playstore... also, Dead space lags too... mabye a kernel related problem, i will flash the rom and kernel again and see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone. didn't try dead space either, so cant really tell. i did try vice city and nfs, they ran quite good on stock for me.
Flying_Bear said:
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone. didn't try dead space either, so cant really tell. i did try vice city and nfs, they ran quite good on stock for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i will download again from google play and come back and tell
Enviado desde mi LG-P880 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta
Flying_Bear said:
yeah, that might be the issue. unfortunately, tegra3 in our phone didn't quite live up to my expectations, which sux since even nexus7 has better performance than our phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it? 3DMark benchmarks disagree.
I did manage to reproduce the OP's results though. I installed TegraOverclock and suddenly my 3DMark results were the same as the ones he posted. If I uninstall it I get the attached image.
Subtleone said:
Does it? 3DMark benchmarks disagree.
I did manage to reproduce the OP's results though. I installed TegraOverclock and suddenly my 3DMark results were the same as the ones he posted. If I uninstall it I get the attached image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
average results for nexus 7 are better than those for o4x, unfortunately.
http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/LG+Optimus+4X+HD/review
Flying_Bear said:
average results for nexus 7 are better than those for o4x, unfortunately.
http://community.futuremark.com/hardware/mobile/LG+Optimus+4X+HD/review
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might wish to see the image I posted on a non-overclocked phone.
Subtleone said:
You might wish to see the image I posted on a non-overclocked phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and i can post my image of benchmark with 3200 score, overclocked . since my score is as valid as yours, we might as well take the average that's on the website - and the average number says that nexus7 performs better than o4x.
on the other hand, i dont game much these days, and the games i do run, run well enough. so, it's just a benchmark, a number; however i have expected tegra3 in this phone to have higher number than tablet with practically identical chip in it
Flying_Bear said:
and i can post my image of benchmark with 3200 score, overclocked . since my score is as valid as yours, we might as well take the average that's on the website - and the average number says that nexus7 performs better than o4x.
on the other hand, i dont game much these days, and the games i do run, run well enough. so, it's just a benchmark, a number; however i have expected tegra3 in this phone to have higher number than tablet with practically identical chip in it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While it is indeed just a number, it does actually measure something. Unless my configuration is somehow exploiting it specifically to achieve those scores, you might wish to see why you underscore so much and fix it. The phones are identical after all, and no one is talking about fancy coolers or the like as exists in PCs.
Subtleone said:
While it is indeed just a number, it does actually measure something. Unless my configuration is somehow exploiting it specifically to achieve those scores, you might wish to see why you underscore so much and fix it. The phones are identical after all, and no one is talking about fancy coolers or the like as exists in PCs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did some testing, and may have the answer for you. The vanilla iodak sets the CPU to 1.7GHz and the 3D and 2D GPU to 520MHz, all of which are maximum values, hence the very good 3DMark scores. If you use an app such as TegraOverclock and set those values you should get the same scores or at least very close to them. I did notice that any attempt to apply an overclock to the GPU was instantly rejected. If I tried to set it to 600MHz it was immediately set at... 300MHz, so as far as I can tell, 520 is the highest possible.
I
Subtleone said:
I did some testing, and may have the answer for you. The vanilla iodak sets the CPU to 1.7GHz and the 3D and 2D GPU to 520MHz, all of which are maximum values, hence the very good 3DMark scores. If you use an app such as TegraOverclock and set those values you should get the same scores or at least very close to them. I did notice that any attempt to apply an overclock to the GPU was instantly rejected. If I tried to set it to 600MHz it was immediately set at... 300MHz, so as far as I can tell, 520 is the highest possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it puts to 300mhz because is the minimun, in 520mhz the minimun is 200...
Edit: flashed back V20C, getting 3570 stock, i will flash Iodak again.. and test... without donwloading tegra overclock...
Edit again, this is with iodak v6 stock settings it seems that thegra overclock app reduces the performance of our devices...
Stock kernel has its gpu running at 200mhz base, scaling up to 416. Custom kernels can increase that, which leads to higher scores. I got 4k by increasing gpu to 520mhz. I don't see how just having tegra oc installed could break anything