Just curious if there is a general ETA on SBFs for a phone?
Do we usually see it within the few 2-3 months, randomly, ?
Hah I was going to reply with "Patience young padawan" then I saw your name was jediman lol.. what a coincidence.
Or maybe my subconscious picked up your name first and I thought of replying because of it..
Anyways! yeah an SBF is going to be incredibly hard to obtain, if not impossible.
Dmw017 said:
Anyways! yeah an SBF is going to be incredibly hard to obtain, if not impossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impossible? Nah, we will def get one. When? Thats another story.
Nothings impossible. Plus, with Google acquiring Motorola, there may be a lot of changes, which hopefully means unlocked bootloaders and more freedom for developers.
This.. tho I am new to android devices.
I'm also pretty sure Google's acquisition of Motorola is going to make all of Motorola's phones in general more accessible to developers.
Nolam20 said:
Nothings impossible. Plus, with Google acquiring Motorola, there may be a lot of changes, which hopefully means unlocked bootloaders and more freedom for developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my DROID3 using XDA App
DROID 3 Fastboot IMG?
[19:28] <techdigital> my question is, since fastboot img's dont have to be signed
[19:28] <techdigital> cant anybody with a working D3 make them
[19:28] <techdigital> ?
[19:29] <techdigital> Fastboot = ADB when there is no ADB
[19:29] <techdigital> it can in a sense push files
[19:29] <techdigital> using the flash command
[19:29] <techdigital> so lets say someone made a img of the system
[19:30] <techdigital> then it would respond as adb does after a push with size and time it took
[19:32] <techdigital> my question is can someone with a working device make system,boot,Framework, and Preinstall img's to get all softbricked back
[19:34] <techdigital> yes you would have to push the different images using fastboot
[19:34] <techdigital> but it seems like a win
[19:34] <techdigital> im just not in touch with the big dev's to ask about such a thing
[19:35] <techdigital> if we had our own set of img files would it not be just as good as a sbf
Yes google did buy motorola mobility, but its not going to happen just like that. itll be a few months before you see google do anything with it. So unless it gets leaked from motorola/verizon within that time, i don't see us having an sbf anytime soon.
also i heard the sbf's are watermarked now, so if it does get leaked, its going to cost someone a job.
Unless I am missing something, some of the images must be signed to flash in fastboot. Preinstall is the only one we know about right now that does not require a sig.
Sent from my DROID3 using XDA Premium App
What about the moto dev site?
Haven't some of the SBF's come there?
I know the Xoom images for wifi and I thought Verizon were there as well?
Nolam20 said:
Nothings impossible. Plus, with Google acquiring Motorola, there may be a lot of changes, which hopefully means unlocked bootloaders and more freedom for developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i've been thinking about the acquisition and Motorola's "promise" that devices will have unlocked bootloaders this year and have been wondering if Moto's promise was insight into the Google acquisition.
these things don't just happen overnight. G&M had to have been talking about this for a while before going public.
640k said:
i've been thinking about the acquisition and Motorola's "promise" that devices will have unlocked bootloaders this year and have been wondering if Moto's promise was insight into the Google acquisition.
these things don't just happen overnight. G&M had to have been talking about this for a while before going public.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty convinced this is exactly what they meant.
The approval for the purchase in the USA, Europe and elsewhere probably won't happen until 2012. So, I doubt we'll see Google have much influence until then, and, whatever changes they make won't come quickly.
Finally, my guess is Motorola is locked into agreements with the carriers, especially Verizon, to keep the phones locked. I think this more than anything else is preventing them from releasing anything right now. What Motorola said is they'll unlock bootloaders in late 2011 if allowed by the carrier. That's when the OG Droid turns two and is probably no coincidence.
is there not a rule against these questions?! I mean.. in terms of it being an entire post.. come on!
TheDeathly said:
also i heard the sbf's are watermarked now, so if it does get leaked, its going to cost someone a job.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there has to be a disgruntled moto employee somewhere lol
Here is the bottom line.
Every time an SBF file is released, someone risked their job to make that happen.
Motorola never releases SBF files for public use.
Whenever you get one, be thankful because these are extremely valuable and very difficult to acquire resources.
jediman said:
Just curious if there is a general ETA on SBFs for a phone?
Do we usually see it within the few 2-3 months, randomly, ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We get them when they leak, which was usually before the phones are even released. Motorola cracked down on leaks at the beginning of the summer so the flow of leaked SBFs and dev phones for that matter has tapered off. I wouldn't expect it to take much longer. We can make SBFs, but in order to that someone needs to post the CDT at a minimum so those of us without D3 can make one
Tell me how and I can do that and I can when I get off. My girlfriend has a Droid 3 too. Nothing has been done to it except apps from the market.
nullness said:
We get them when they leak, which was usually before the phones are even released. Motorola cracked down on leaks at the beginning of the summer so the flow of leaked SBFs and dev phones for that matter has tapered off. I wouldn't expect it to take much longer. We can make SBFs, but in order to that someone needs to post the CDT at a minimum so those of us without D3 can make one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my DROID3 using XDA App
Related
This is taken from engadget.com
HTC is legendary for its tacit support of the Android ROM cooking community. Motorola... not so much, thanks in large part to the company's policy of locking down the bootloader as a means to prevent unapproved software from running on its Droid handsets. An annoyance recently exacperated by a moderator of Moto's YouTube channel who suggested that customers looking to install custom ROMs should "buy elsewhere." Ouch. The resulting public relations kerfuffle then prompted Motorola to publish a clarification to its bootloader policy on Facebook:
We apologize for the feedback we provided regarding our bootloader policy. The response does not reflect the views of Motorola. We are working closely with our partners to offer a bootloader solution that will enable developers to use our devices as a development platform while still protecting our users' interests. More detailed information will follow as we get closer to availability.
Obviously, we'll have wait for said details to get official before calling this a shift in strategy. It's certainly an improvement over Moto's previous approach of lawyering-up with cease and desist orders. Perhaps Motorola is taking a cue from Microsoft who seems to have recently discovered that it's better to embrace than to annoy a motivated hacking community -- customers who tend to be a company's most dedicated fans and evangelists.
Good news?
Direct Link: http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/21/motorola-ready-to-make-sweet-love-to-rom-devs-and-rooters/
its a maybe. maybe they will launch our froyo locked, maybe it'll be open. we never know.
i just read this also. this could be great news or another terrible taunt whih leads to nothing.
im not gonna get my hopes up just yet.
available Q1 of 2046, stay tuned! lol
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Sounds like a PR stunt to quell the immediate situation before waiting for it to blow over.
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
I dont believe in manufaturer, i believe in XDA dev's..... this a "cold water" not a hope for us.
I hope this isn't just some PR bull and moto actually enables us to load custom kernels.
That press release says nothing about unlocking the bootloader, only that they will help devs which could mean anything!
DummyPLUG said:
available Q1 of 2046, stay tuned! lol
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMFAO!!!
i dnt believe motorolsh!t will do that(unlocking the bootloader)
I so love my new HTC Desire! couldnt stand this situation anymore....! sorry guys...
It is just the usual PR crap which companies like them give when they screw up on the social networking front. The "..buy elsewhere.." was just a such screw up. A Royal one I would say!
They are now trying to calm down the situation by giving us this crap..
I think it's just a excuse about the bad comments in youtube video, nothing more than that.
DummyPLUG said:
available Q1 of 2046, stay tuned!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2046???
...that seems a little too soon... dont ya think?
Menelkir said:
I think it's just a excuse about the bad comments in youtube video, nothing more than that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That seems most likely but perhaps the fallout and bad press from that will push them to do what they should have done long ago, free the bootloader in some form so we can get custom ROMs on it.
Dyonas said:
That seems most likely but perhaps the fallout and bad press from that will push them to do what they should have done long ago, free the bootloader in some form so we can get custom ROMs on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I really want to see this happening, but I don't have any hope about Motorola opening the bootloader.
If they do, ok, excelent news to the community, to all developers that will make even better ROMs and for all of us that have a Motorola phone. We can see the quality of alternative ROMs for Motorola Milestone today as example. It's obvious that the only limitation is the bootloader, so the quality can be massively improved if we can change and optimize the kernel.
But I think all people here are already tired from Motorola's position about his costumers: Censorship on comments (youtube and motorola forums), censorship on criticism (even the very good ones, Motorola does not seem to care about the opinion of his costumers), cease and desist in community cases like the ROM of Droid X and sites with roms (that its very stupid IMHO)... and the list goes on...
By the way, my only hope is, if that happens and I have not exchanged my phone yet, good.. I'll make good use of it. But honestly? I have now my last phone from Motorola.
Am I missing something? Forgive my ignorance, but what is "locked up" about the bootloader? I'm running CM6 along with the overclocked CM6 kernel, and there are tons of other custom ROMs out for the Droid as it stands. What is restricted by Motorola?
vapor63 said:
Am I missing something? Forgive my ignorance, but what is "locked up" about the bootloader? I'm running CM6 along with the overclocked CM6 kernel, and there are tons of other custom ROMs out for the Droid as it stands. What is restricted by Motorola?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Milestone users cannot use custom kernels. All the AOSP ROMs still have to use the SAME kernel, supplied by Mot. They lock it to the bootloader. This means problems trying to compile modules and customer kernels and no way to patch bugs.
It is much more work for devs to get stuff done for the milestone than other phone (htc comes to mind).
Examples of issues: battery life, phone sleeping, waiting for compatible kernel or hack for new android versions, swap support, vpn support, other filesystem support... the list goes on.
But you allowed to be happy with your phone. Not everybody needs these things...
Sent from my Milestone using Tapatalk
He has a very good point. Where other android device builders seem to be promoting development (Huawei excluded, theyre miser's just like Motorola), this company seems to be more prominent on the restriction of development on their devices.
One very good reason for this is that Motorola has been such a huge phone developer for such a long time, that they have probably let it go to their head. Now instead of saying "our consumers said they need this", they're sayin "we think they really only need this." I've used Motorola phones for about 8 years now, and I would DEFINITELY say someone forgot that their customers put them where their at.
I agree. Someone needs to get out there and give them a taste of Good Customer Service. I dont think restricting dev's is a great marketing idea, or revenue booster anyways. BUt then again, to each, his own.
This is PR.Nothing more.
Know motorola they do not update РСТ(Russian legal)Milestone, they do not
need to unlock this crap bootloader.
We seem to have a lot of confusion in the Atrix forum about the implications of an encrypted and or locked bootloader.
What is a bootloader?
See this article for a decent description.
Is the bootloader on the Atrix encrypted?
We don't know and likely will not know until the phone is released and people smarter than I can look at it. No reviews, including the Engadget review, have looked at whether the bootloader is encrypted. However, some have inaccurately said that it is because the installation of non-market apps is not permitted the bootloader is encrypted. However, this is a separate issue and is a requirement imposed by ATT that has nothing to do with the bootloader.
Why do people assume the bootloader is encypted?
Motorola has a strong recent history of releasing encrypted bootloaders, see the Droid X and Milestone phones. Most of the current discussion about the bootloader is limited to what we have seen from Motorola in the past. That being said, there is some hope that the bootloader will not be encrypted. In prior phones, such as the Droid X and Milestone, Motorola relied on the eFuse feature of Texas Instruments OMAP processors. Given that the Atrix uses an Nvidia Tegra 2 chip it is unlikely that Motorola can utilize the same eFuse technology.
As a result, there is some reason to be optimistic that the Atrix will only have a locked and not encrypted bootloader.
What is the difference between a locked and encrypted bootloader?
This is a good post on the topic. Locked bootloaders are on almost all android phones, including the Nexus S. Although certain locks, such as the Nexus S, are easier to open. A locked bootloader is essentially software that is written in such a way so as to prevent you from gaining access. So far XDA devs have been very skilled at cracking locked bootloaders by finding holes in this software.
An encrypted bootloader, from my understanding, is not itself encrypted, but signed by an encryption key. The phones hardware will refuse to boot unless the software that it attempts to boot is signed with the correct encryption key. The only options to crack this protection appear to be to go around the bootloader which is unlikely or to crack the encryption which also appears unlikely. See this post for more discussion.
What does an encypted bootloader mean to me?
This post at Android Forums provides a great summary of the effects of an encrypted bootloader. If you have the time, the entire thread is very informative.
The bad news is an encrypted bootloader likely means no custom kernels. This means that custom ROMs must rely on the official kernel. It also means the OS version (Froyo, Gingerbread . . .) is limited to whatever the official release is. The good news is that root access is still be possible. Root access allows you to run certain applications as the root or administrator. This allows for a lot of customization and hacking of your phone.
In the end, an encrypted bootloader may hinder your ability to completely hack the phone.
Can an encrypted bootloader be cracked?
Unlikely. For a brief discussion see this post and read the thread for a better understanding. I am aware that there is a team working on cracking the Milestone encryption using the BIONIC platform and a distributed computing effort, see androinc.net. However, even that team admits that the second coming of the dinosaurs may occur before they crack the encryption. I believe on the Milestone that the encryption is 1024 bit, which according to androinc.net may take hundreds of thousands of years to crack using a brute force method, even on a distributed computing platform.
Can a locked bootloader be cracked?
We won't know until we see it, but likely yes. Generally all software coded by humans has some error in it that can be exploited.
Why should I care if the bootloader protection cannot be circumvented?
You don't have to. But, in today's environment, consumers are tied to a 2 year contracts but new phones are released on a 1 year or less timeline. This means the device you buy today will likely be forgotten by your carrier and the phone manufacturer long before your contract is up. The inability to load custom kernels means that consumers cannot upgrade their own phones after the manufacturer decides to no longer support the phone. The decision to stop supporting upgrades often occurs well before a phones 2 year birthday, see the Motorola Upgrade Roadmap.
In addition, many people believe that they have purchased the phone hardware and should be permitted to do anything that they please with the hardware.
** I do not claim to be an expert, I have only recanted the results of my research. If I have made a mistake please let me know.
thanks for writing this i was going to my self today as i have been fighting people all day with this, i was trying to get motorola to tell me as i had a few reps available in a forum and one said that he will get back to me shortly with an answer ... but i was having to do so with people that dont know the difference chiming in and making the q&a with moto hard even for some one who does know what hes talking about ... any how i will update when i get my reply, and thanks again for putting info in right place btw up at top you put milestone instead of atrix
What a great and informative post. THIS SHOULD BE STICKIED for the time being to prevent future threads that ask the same questions. Great job.
Sent from my MSM using XDA App
sdlopez83 said:
What a great and informative post. THIS SHOULD BE STICKIED for the time being to prevent future threads that ask the same questions. Great job.
Sent from my MSM using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 here, very informative.
Thanks and sorry about the typos.
Nice job both in the layout and in maintaining an unbiased take on the possibilities.
thankyou for explaining that so well
can we get a MOD to sticky this for a while, at least until we know whether it is encrypted or what not. could really cut down on the "does the bootloader restrict me from doing xxxxxxxxxxx?" chatter on all the threads.
+1 Great post! Guess we'll have to wait for quantum computers before we can crack 1024bit encryption in under a lifetime (seconds probably.) But very informative, I'm off to read everything you linked in your post.
Excellent post sir!
Great post! This should be required reading...
That means that if the Atrix 4G is HSUPA disabled, there's no way around it?
royalemint said:
That means that if the Atrix 4G is HSUPA disabled, there's no way around it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please post in the general forum where a thread is going about this. however, it can mostly likely be resolved with a new modem driver.
I have an Atrix 4G in my hand... how can I find out if the bootloader is encrypted?
EGBTMagus said:
I have an Atrix 4G in my hand... how can I find out if the bootloader is encrypted?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like to know also. I know there are other threads about this the only problem is that there are 6 different answers/opinions.
Does not look good:
The Atrix 4G has a locked and encrypted bootloader. More bootloader related announcements are forthcoming.
http://getsatisfaction.com/motorola...tm_medium=email&utm_source=reply_notification
TinyRK said:
Does not look good:
The Atrix 4G has a locked and encrypted bootloader. More bootloader related announcements are forthcoming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
... and here just for the record:
https://supportforums.motorola.com/thread/45249?start=15&tstart=0
meta96 said:
... and here just for the record:
https://supportforums.motorola.com/thread/45249?start=15&tstart=0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw both of those. I am not totally convinced by a PR response, even if it is from Moto. So far the devs here in XDA seem to think it is only signed. I am inclined to believe them more, at least until I see otherwise.
Also, I need to update my OP and will try and do so tonight.
krkeegan said:
I saw both of those. I am not totally convinced by a PR response, even if it is from Moto. So far the devs here in XDA seem to think it is only signed. I am inclined to believe them more, at least until I see otherwise.
https://supportforums.motorola.com/thread/45249?start=15&tstart=0
Also, I need to update my OP and will try and do so tonight.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
... the number of page views for this topic is bad PR, isn't it? It is just a act/react thing, you know ...
Who is your daddy and what does he do?
I dunno why but that's immediately what I thought of, lol
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I think users need to rise up and demand source code from Motorola. The one has been out long enough, and there is nothing on their Sourceforge site about it. Also after it comes out, be sure to test what they updated. They have a bad habit of uploaded stuff that is either corrupted, or missing files.
If you get me an email to send something to, I can write something up that each of us can send.
Sent from my DROID3 using XDA App
If you want to do it officially you have to actually use snail mail. There is address mentioned somewhere.
They have somewhat responded on the forums of Sourceforge, though as I said there isn't a section for the Droid 3 yet. You could also try the Motorola Forums, and word might get through the grape vine.
A trick I have used once before with a cable company was to go through the press releases on their website, collect all the e-mail addresses, and e-mail them all the same message.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1181570
I say we hire Lulzsec to hack Motorola and leak the boot loader keys and sbf files for all phones possible. did I just say that?
Either that or try to get them to crack the boot loader or obtain root.....
I'm just saying....they seem very good at this stuff.
nerdslogic said:
I say we hire Lulzsec to hack Motorola and leak the boot loader keys and sbf files for all phones possible. did I just say that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That, sir, is some of the smartest dumb **** I have read on the internet in a long while.
lol seriously, that would be an awesome way to get source. It's just crazy enough to work....... If only we had someone with connections XD
EDIT: Let's let the dev's have their fun without a bunch of newbs poking in on them. Sorry, devs.
Probably don't want this info to get out to the entire Internets anyways.
CZ Eddie said:
Hmmm..........
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=51983540
No, you don't have root/unlock for ATT S5.
But...... hmmmm...
**** DO NOT POST IN THAT THREAD. IT IS A DEVELOPERS-ONLY THREAD. DON'T BE A DORK AND POST IN IT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty exciting. I am not a dev. so I dont really know how to distinguish between what exactly is going on, but a little progress and excitement is always good for the community. Not to mention the respect and bounty these devs will get once something major actually does happen.
EDIT: Let's let the dev's have their fun without a bunch of newbs poking in on them. Sorry, devs.
Probably don't want this info to get out to the entire Internets anyways.
CZ Eddie said:
Basically, evilpotatoman located a much-wanted Qualcomm tool that could possibly lead to finally unlocking the bootloader of S4, S5 and Note 3 (and others). *Possibly being the key word.
At the moment it's still not possible, but the tool apparently gives them a huge leap forward in development towards this goal.
They've been looking for something like this for a few years now I believe.
I'm not a dev, don't pretend to be one. The extent of my "development" is writing a few scripts. lol. So remember that I may be misunderstanding some things here. :good:
There are a bunch of files attached to the thread.
But none of us should bother downloading them because you have to be an ultra-dev to know how to use them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding i that this is the SDK for the SoC on the S5 and other phones. It includes a qualcomm dev signing cert but I'm almost 100% certain that no production phone from AT&T will accept BL's signed by the qc dev cert (or someone would have used it to sign one of the unlocked BL's by now plus if that were the case my guess is qc would be freaking out and sending takedown notices by now). So basically if Samsung or AT&T were to provide the signing key or somehow we were to brute force it(very unlikely) we would now be able to easily sign packages for the phone. So while helpful, without the signing keys it doesn't really do anything except provide more insight into how the whole secure boot process works.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2692167&page=11
cciechad said:
My understanding i that this is the SDK for the SoC on the S5 and other phones. It includes a qualcomm dev signing cert but I'm almost 100% certain that no production phone from AT&T will accept BL's signed by the qc dev cert (or someone would have used it to sign one of the unlocked BL's by now plus if that were the case my guess is qc would be freaking out and sending takedown notices by now). So basically if Samsung or AT&T were to provide the signing key or somehow we were to brute force it(very unlikely) we would now be able to easily sign packages for the phone. So while helpful, without the signing keys it doesn't really do anything except provide more insight into how the whole secure boot process works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qc sent the takedown notice...dun dun duuunnn
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I think this is bs. No roms,no nothing for this damn phone still. Its been months and no progress. I am not a developer and yes i complaining. Nobody can say that the bootloader is locked down or its because of kitkat... look at the g2 the g3 its insane with how much roms there is. I dont believe anything or anyone saying the bootloader is locked....A BUNCH OF BS!!!. I am going to look into developing for this phone because we are at a standstill for far too long. Gonna install linux on my computer when i have free time and atart putting in work.
podagee said:
I think this is bs. No roms,no nothing for this damn phone still. Its been months and no progress. I am not a developer and yes i complaining. Nobody can say that the bootloader is locked down or its because of kitkat... look at the g2 the g3 its insane with how much roms there is. I dont believe anything or anyone saying the bootloader is locked....A BUNCH OF BS!!!. I am going to look into developing for this phone because we are at a standstill for far too long. Gonna install linux on my computer when i have free time and atart putting in work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel exactly the same.
This phone is like a king among phones, but a king who is in exile
Even with stock this phone is simply outstanding and I'm sure LG will update it to lollipop
But it needs lots of developer love for sure
I'm also learning how to develop, just for the love of this device
Sent from my LG-D950 using XDA Free mobile app
Not by any means a developer, but I'm pretty tech savvy and know a few languages, so if i can help in any way let me know. I want to get this ball rolling!
We are gonna need some help from mattwheat also. Busy this weekend but will check out some things soon....
Guys the bootloader is definitely locked down tighter than sh#!. But there is a work around. I.e. "BUMP"
With the Flex 2 now out I figured all hope WS gone for this device. If I knew more or had the time to learn like I used to have we would be rockin some AOKP, RESERECTION, OR some CM-12 based ROM.
I used to be on night shift for years and had all the time in the world after work (hence my 3am and 4am post). But I've left that company to start a new job that is now day shift. Which allows me more time with my son. But cuts into the amount of time I used to have. But I wouldn't change it for the world. But I will help anytime I can. But I think by summer I may move to either the Nexus 6 or the Flex 2 <--- only if the boot loader is unlockable like the LG G3 is.
It is a shame about the boot loader. Gave the flex to my daughter and moved on to the
Nexus 6 and have no regrets.
Great news cm12 incoming.check out lg-devs at github
Got 4.4.2 ZVB Rooted w/ TWRP 2.8.0.0 w/bump so if you need a tester i'll be scoping the forums, if you need a tester!
Sent from my LG-LS995 Keep on Flexin!
http://opensource.lge.com/osList/list?m=Mc001&s=Sc002
The 995 is on this list......
sickkside13 said:
Great news cm12 incoming.check out lg-devs at github
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't find anything on it... Provide link please?
XDAkilla757 said:
Can't find anything on it... Provide link please?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/lg-devs?tab=repositories
It's about as old as this thread. This phone needs a developer willing to spend some time. Start a CM bounty thread and see where that goes
Supertacomonkeyexplosion said:
https://github.com/lg-devs?tab=repositories
It's about as old as this thread. This phone needs a developer willing to spend some time. Start a CM bounty thread and see where that goes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since it is rootable and a custom recovery can be installed. It should be a near walk in the park for the devs.