Hi!
If you're beginning Java like me, then share your code here!
Simply use the code tags.
Here's my latest application:
Code:
package name;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class Name {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner user_input = new Scanner(System.in);
String first_name;
System.out.print("Enter your first name: ");
first_name = user_input.next();
String surname;
System.out.print("Enter your surname: ");
surname = user_input.next();
String age;
System.out.print("How old are you: ");
age = user_input.next();
String full_name;
full_name = first_name + " " + surname;
System.out.println("You are " + full_name + "." + "You are also " + age + " " + "years old.");
System.out.println("Note that some of this information may not be true, since it it the information you or someone/something else provided.");
System.out.println("You got a problem with that?!?!");
System.out.println("Thank you for using my awesome Java application!");
}
}
So, post yours!!
Right. I see there aren't many people Beginning Java round here.
Bad-Wolf said:
Right. I see there aren't many people Beginning Java round here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. I had 1 semester of Java well over a year ago. I forgot most of it since I started c++, which I forgot also the day after the semester ended.
I was learning c#, but then i realized that it's a crap language and im not going to get anywhere using it, so i started learning Java, which i'm trying hard to remember, and as you have seen, i have.
Yea Java is the **** right now. C++ is good for windows only. I have to see if I can continue taking Java in college instead of C++. And it is so much easier than C++ or any C language for that matter.
I used to study Java but my college wants C++. I think Java is easier when it comes to GUI.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Agreed.
10chars
Well, isn't anyone going to post anything? Even a hello world is good enough here!
Sent from a Time Lord, using his TARDIS.
Get your grey matter round this one!
Code:
public class test
{
static String startstring;
static int startlen;
public static void main(String[] args)
{
startstring = args[0];
startlen=startstring.length();
genanag(args[0].substring(0,1),args[0].substring(1,2));
}
public static void genanag(String oldstring, String insert)
{
String newstring;
int i;
int oldlen=oldstring.length();;
for(i=0;i<=oldlen;i++)
{
newstring=oldstring.substring(0,i)+insert+oldstring.substring(i);
if(newstring.length()==startlen)
System.out.print(newstring+"\n");
else
genanag(newstring,startstring.substring(oldlen+1,oldlen+2));
}
}
}
When you run it you get this :
Code:
C:\PROGRA~1\Java\JDK16~1.0_2\bin>java test ABCD
DCBA
CDBA
CBDA
CBAD
DBCA
BDCA
BCDA
BCAD
DBAC
BDAC
BADC
BACD
DCAB
CDAB
CADB
CABD
DACB
ADCB
ACDB
ACBD
DABC
ADBC
ABDC
ABCD
C:\PROGRA~1\Java\JDK16~1.0_2\bin>
stephj said:
Get your grey matter round this one!
Code:
public class test
{
static String startstring;
static int startlen;
public static void main(String[] args)
{
startstring = args[0];
startlen=startstring.length();
genanag(args[0].substring(0,1),args[0].substring(1,2));
}
public static void genanag(String oldstring, String insert)
{
String newstring;
int i;
int oldlen=oldstring.length();;
for(i=0;i<=oldlen;i++)
{
newstring=oldstring.substring(0,i)+insert+oldstring.substring(i);
if(newstring.length()==startlen)
System.out.print(newstring+"\n");
else
genanag(newstring,startstring.substring(oldlen+1,oldlen+2));
}
}
}
When you run it you get this :
Code:
C:\PROGRA~1\Java\JDK16~1.0_2\bin>java test ABCD
DCBA
CDBA
CBDA
CBAD
DBCA
BDCA
BCDA
BCAD
DBAC
BDAC
BADC
BACD
DCAB
CDAB
CADB
CABD
DACB
ADCB
ACDB
ACBD
DABC
ADBC
ABDC
ABCD
C:\PROGRA~1\Java\JDK16~1.0_2\bin>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THAT!
IS!
COOL!
Unfortunately I'm not uo to that stage yet. Moving onto Joptionpane next, whatever that is.LOl. Where'dya learn Java.
Allow me to do some experimental BB Code programming!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Bad-Wolf said:
Where'dya learn Java.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been programming for years, originally in COBOL.
The ability to code in Java came from learning C#, from previously learning C++, itself from C. (Other languages include Fortran, 370 Assember, PC Assembler and RPG III/IV, but none of these have much in common with object orientated programming.)
While the C# and Java communities seem to take great delight in throwing brickbats at each other from their respective trenches, there is not really a great deal of difference between the two languages, not any that are worth getting upset about!
Right let's make it do something vaguely useful.......... This was originally coded in C# as a solution to the following post.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1435629
ISO6346 defines the layout of serial numbers and the checksum digit for intermodal containers. (The 20 and 40 ft metal containers used to ship almost everything these days.) :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_6346
This code takes the first ten characters of the serial number and calculates the checksum digit. The argument must be of the form ABCD123456 or there is no response:
Code:
public class ISO6346
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
String Input = args[0].toUpperCase();
int i,j,k;
if(Input.matches("[A-Z]{4}[0-9]{6}"))
{
k=0;
for (i=0; i<10; i++)
{
j = Input.charAt(i);
if (j > 64 && j < 91)
k += ((j - 55) + (j - 56) / 10) << i;
else
k += (j - 48) << i;
}
k = ((k % 11) % 10);
System.out.print(Input.substring(0,4)+" "+Input.substring(4)+" "+k);
}
}
}
Results in:
Code:
C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_23\bin>JAVA ISO6346 TOLU473478
TOLU 473478 7
C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_23\bin>
Compare the result with the image in the top right of the Wikipedia page.......... and that concludes the case for the defense, Your Honour!
As my current Project is based on JSP, I'll share the crap I'm doing now :
Function for Inserting datas into database (Anyways the database should be connected before doing this [includes code] + --> Connection con = null; PreparedStatement ps = null
Code:
public boolean FunctionName(String name, String address, String phoneno)
{
boolean flag = false;
try {
ps = con.prepareStatement("insert into TABLE_NAME(FIELD_1,FIELD2,FIELD_3) values(?,?,?)");
ps.setString(1,name);
ps.setString(2,address);
ps.setString(3,phoneno);
ps.executeUpdate();
flag = true;
}
catch(Exception e) {
System.out.println("Error in Insertion"+e);
}
return flag;
}
+
HTML / JSP Design Page should be there to get values from user (Textbox)
+
JSP action page should be there to trigger action when user clicks the button on the design page.
Where would anyone here recommend starting to learn Java from? Online, books, classes? Just starting out and not sure which is the best place to go first? I have dl Java sdk and eclipse but that's about as far as I'm at.
Sent from my GT-P7300 using Tapatalk
Database Connection code (Mysql is discussed) :
Code:
package com.db; //Package name optional
import java.sql.*;
public class DbConnection()
{
Connection con = null;
PreparedStatement ps = null;
ResultSet rs = null; //ResultSet is useful for Select queries
public DbConnection() //Create a constructor
{
try {
Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver");
con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://localhost/DATABASE_NAME","root",""); //I guess root is default in Mysql
}
catch(Exception e) {
System.out.println("Error in Connection"+e);
}
}
}
---------- Post added at 08:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:04 PM ----------
Aust S5 said:
Where would anyone here recommend starting to learn Java from? Online, books, classes? Just starting out and not sure which is the best place to go first? I have dl Java sdk and eclipse but that's about as far as I'm at.
Sent from my GT-P7300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best reference for Core Java (ie, Java SE) I'd recommend "The Complete Reference Java Seventh Edition (Or Fifth Edition) by Herbert Schildt"
And don't start studying Java using IDE (like Eclipse or Netbeans)
Start writing code using simple Notepad or Notepad++ and compile it in Command Prompt. This is the best way for freshers.
Aust S5 said:
Where would anyone here recommend starting to learn Java from? Online, books, classes? Just starting out and not sure which is the best place to go first? I have dl Java sdk and eclipse but that's about as far as I'm at.
Sent from my GT-P7300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love this book.
http://www.amazon.com/Head-First-Ja...9208/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1331745451&sr=8-1
Thanks guys I'll look into both of these. I'm looking forwards to learning all i can. Fingers crossed
sent from Grey Skull
As Java used to be owned by Sun, before they themselves were bought by Oracle, there is a whole load of documentation beginning here:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/
As well as here:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/overview/index.html
The API documentation is useful when you need to find which method of which object you need to do the job.
Simple java code
one of first for math (ax^2+bx+c)
Code:
int a=2; //example
int b=3;
int c=4;
for (int i = 0; i<=100;i++){
if((a*(i*i)+b*i+c)==4)
system.out.println(i);
}
That is beyond me! If I had more time, I would be learning Java quicker.
Sent from a Time Lord, using his TARDIS.
I've seen a lot of comments, about the possible battery size in the Nexus 5, which is only ~10% larger than a Nexus 4, which had OK, but not great battery life.
So the N5 is rumoured to have 2300 mAh 3.8v battery, the same size as the HTC One, a device with much better battery life than the N4. But what people are overlooking is the improvements in power efficiency from the Snapdragon 800, although it is a much faster SoC than the S4 Pro in the N4, it actually requires less voltage. This is possible due to TSMC's superior HPM 28nm process, which uses a technology called high-K metal gates, both the Snapdragon 600 & S4 Pro were manufactured on TSMC's 28nm LP process.
But, what if you don't believe me, well just look below. I compare the voltage tables for a S800 vs a S600, we must remember that S600 is an improved S4 Pro, these improvements included higher efficiency (battery life), so it's better than the S4 Pro in the Nexus 4.
28nm LP @ 1.7 GHz = 1075mv -- Snapdragon 600
28nm HPM @ 1.7 GHz = 900mv -- Snapdragon 800
So the S800 uses significantly less power, but achieves much greater performance. There is one outlier, the Adreno 330 GPU it of course is also built on the same superior HPM process, but contains more ALU (compute) units than any Adreno 320, so at max 100% usage may consume slightly more power. In the real world, the CPU/GPU do not sit at 100% all time, and the much faster S800 can complete a task eg load a webpage, faster than the Nexus 4, and then power down, whilst the N4 would still be rendering the webpage. This is a double win, faster ultimate performance means a task can be completed quicker, and the SoC put into low power mode, the fact that S800 needs less voltage in the first place magnifies the advantage.
Another possible power efficiency for the S800, is the on-die modem (baseband), unlike the S4 Pro / S600 which had a separate modem, we don't have hard data for this, but logic suggests that this a more efficient solution.
In conclusion using the 2300 mAh HTC One as a guide, which also has a 1080P display, older Snapdragon 600 and more software bloat than vanilla Android 4.4, I'd wager that the Nexus 5 will easily beat the Nexus 4 & HTC One for battery life. Of course we'd all love a a bigger battery, but given the incredible value of the Nexus phones, compromises have to be made, and I think battery life will be sufficient.
TSMC 28nm LP
static struct acpu_level tbl_PVS5_1700MHz[] __initdata = {
{ 1, { 384000, PLL_8, 0, 0x00 }, L2(0), 875000 },
{ 1, { 486000, HFPLL, 2, 0x24 }, L2(5), 875000 },
{ 1, { 594000, HFPLL, 1, 0x16 }, L2(5), 875000 },
{ 1, { 702000, HFPLL, 1, 0x1A }, L2(5), 875000 },
{ 1, { 810000, HFPLL, 1, 0x1E }, L2(5), 887500 },
{ 1, { 918000, HFPLL, 1, 0x22 }, L2(5), 900000 },
{ 1, { 1026000, HFPLL, 1, 0x26 }, L2(5), 925000 },
{ 1, { 1134000, HFPLL, 1, 0x2A }, L2(14), 937500 },
{ 1, { 1242000, HFPLL, 1, 0x2E }, L2(14), 950000 },
{ 1, { 1350000, HFPLL, 1, 0x32 }, L2(14), 962500 },
{ 1, { 1458000, HFPLL, 1, 0x36 }, L2(14), 987500 },
{ 1, { 1566000, HFPLL, 1, 0x3A }, L2(14), 1012500 },
{ 1, { 1674000, HFPLL, 1, 0x3E }, L2(14), 1050000 },
{ 1, { 1728000, HFPLL, 1, 0x40 }, L2(14), 1075000 },
{ 0, { 0 } }
TSMC 28nm HPM
static struct acpu_level acpu_freq_tbl_2p3g_pvs5[] __initdata = {
{ 1, { 300000, PLL_0, 0, 0 }, L2(0), 750000, 72 },
{ 0, { 345600, HFPLL, 2, 36 }, L2(1), 750000, 83 },
{ 1, { 422400, HFPLL, 2, 44 }, L2(2), 750000, 101 },
{ 0, { 499200, HFPLL, 2, 52 }, L2(2), 750000, 120 },
{ 0, { 576000, HFPLL, 1, 30 }, L2(3), 750000, 139 },
{ 1, { 652800, HFPLL, 1, 34 }, L2(3), 760000, 159 },
{ 1, { 729600, HFPLL, 1, 38 }, L2(4), 770000, 180 },
{ 0, { 806400, HFPLL, 1, 42 }, L2(4), 780000, 200 },
{ 1, { 883200, HFPLL, 1, 46 }, L2(4), 790000, 221 },
{ 1, { 960000, HFPLL, 1, 50 }, L2(9), 800000, 242 },
{ 1, { 1036800, HFPLL, 1, 54 }, L2(10), 810000, 264 },
{ 0, { 1113600, HFPLL, 1, 58 }, L2(10), 820000, 287 },
{ 1, { 1190400, HFPLL, 1, 62 }, L2(10), 830000, 308 },
{ 1, { 1267200, HFPLL, 1, 66 }, L2(13), 840000, 333 },
{ 0, { 1344000, HFPLL, 1, 70 }, L2(14), 850000, 356 },
{ 0, { 1420800, HFPLL, 1, 74 }, L2(15), 860000, 380 },
{ 1, { 1497600, HFPLL, 1, 78 }, L2(16), 870000, 404 },
{ 1, { 1574400, HFPLL, 1, 82 }, L2(17), 880000, 430 },
{ 0, { 1651200, HFPLL, 1, 86 }, L2(17), 890000, 456 },
{ 1, { 1728000, HFPLL, 1, 90 }, L2(18), 900000, 482 },
{ 0, { 1804800, HFPLL, 1, 94 }, L2(18), 910000, 510 },
{ 0, { 1881600, HFPLL, 1, 98 }, L2(18), 920000, 538 },
{ 1, { 1958400, HFPLL, 1, 102 }, L2(19), 930000, 565 },
{ 0, { 2035200, HFPLL, 1, 106 }, L2(19), 940000, 596 },
{ 0, { 2112000, HFPLL, 1, 110 }, L2(19), 955000, 627 },
{ 0, { 2188800, HFPLL, 1, 114 }, L2(19), 965000, 659 },
{ 1, { 2265600, HFPLL, 1, 118 }, L2(19), 975000, 691 },
{ 0, { 0 } }
};
Besides all these, I believe android 4.4 is more battery friendly than 4.3
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
ashkan_mc said:
Besides all these, I believe android 4.4 is more battery friendly than 4.3
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I borrow your crystal ball? I need to get tonights lotto numbers
Lewythefly said:
Can I borrow your crystal ball? I need to get tonights lotto numbers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha
Nice thread, i can see that being true. Besides, like it was said above, based on the kitkat video; android 4.4 is said to be an improved project "butter". I expect the 2.300mh battery life to be enough for the phone.I can go as far as to say 3000mh is over doing it and pointless. :silly:
Does anyone know how much screen on time the HTC One gets? I can't find any screenshots in the One forums with the stock kernel and stock ROM.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app
topgeardave said:
Does anyone know how much screen on time the HTC One gets? I can't find any screenshots in the One forums with the stock kernel and stock ROM.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was getting no more then 3.5 hours in a good day but far less on the regular.
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
Of course being a Nexus, we are guaranteed excellent dev support, a custom kernel that allows undervolting will boost battery life, even the Nexus 4 isn't bad with a moderate undervolt.
topgeardave said:
Does anyone know how much screen on time the HTC One gets? I can't find any screenshots in the One forums with the stock kernel and stock ROM.
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally for me on stock ROM and kernel I got no less than 4+ hours screen on time. Going up to 6 hours some days.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk now Free
xXxG0dzRAgexXx said:
Personally for me on stock ROM and kernel I got no less than 4+ hours screen on time. Going up to 6 hours some days.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wicked! Is that with a combination of 4G/wifi with medium brightness?
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app
Lewythefly said:
Can I borrow your crystal ball? I need to get tonights lotto numbers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4 8 15 16 23 42
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Wow.. To put that in perspective, the S800 uses the same voltage at 2.3ghz that my N4 uses at 810mhz!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
ashkan_mc said:
4 8 15 16 23 42
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wouldn't we all be devastated if these actually turn out to be the correct lotto numbers haha
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
It looks like low power tasks and standby is best in class on the SD800. I'd image however that 100% load would brutalize the battery, although it's still nothing compared to the carpet bombing by the Adreno 330, which according to Erica, destroys the G2's 3000mAh playing NFS in 90 minutes. That's just crazy!
Does that mean by underclocking to around 1.5ghz we will get substantial battery savings?
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app
Well, we could downclock our N5s to 1.7 GHz, enjoy good battery and then when the time comes when we need more power we could revert it back to 2.3 GHz. After a few years maybe :cyclops:
That's quite an amusing thought under clocking to 1.7ghz for battery savings, my gnex runs at 1.2ghz which is fine, my 2012 n7 at 1.3 lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
The Gingerbread Man said:
That's quite an amusing thought under clocking to 1.7ghz for battery savings, my gnex runs at 1.2ghz which is fine, my 2012 n7 at 1.3 lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, same here. My sensation is on 1.2ghz at the moment and it's fine. Only bottleneck is 768mb of RAM which means I have to kill many apps. Once I get the phone I'm going to compare battery life on 1.5ghz (same as N4) and 2.3 and see the difference in battery life. I might try an extreme test and downclock them to 1ghz/1.2ghz for lolz to share with everyone. The main thing I've learnt which determines battery life is mpdecision. I'm going to mess about with it till I can get the best battery life
Interesting, one thing I want to mention you're assuming the 'race-to-idle' condition for the CPU. And in web browsing, may not apply since the bottleneck is likely the network that it has to wait for, so even though the CPU may finish local tasks faster, it may spend extra (wasted) cycles waiting for the network to fetch the data. Or even RAM which are slower than local CPU cache.
Also some brief googling for the N4's S4 Pro (8064) chip voltage tables came up with something like this, for more accurate comparison
Code:
static struct acpu_level acpu_freq_tbl_fast[] __initdata = {
{ 1, { 384000, PLL_8, 0, 2, 0x00 }, L2(0), 850000 },
{ 0, { 432000, HFPLL, 2, 0, 0x20 }, L2(6), 875000 },
{ 1, { 486000, HFPLL, 2, 0, 0x24 }, L2(6), 875000 },
{ 0, { 540000, HFPLL, 2, 0, 0x28 }, L2(6), 900000 },
{ 1, { 594000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x16 }, L2(6), 900000 },
{ 0, { 648000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x18 }, L2(6), 925000 },
{ 1, { 702000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x1A }, L2(6), 925000 },
{ 0, { 756000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x1C }, L2(6), 975000 },
{ 1, { 810000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x1E }, L2(6), 975000 },
{ 0, { 864000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x20 }, L2(6), 1000000 },
{ 1, { 918000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x22 }, L2(6), 1000000 },
{ 0, { 972000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x24 }, L2(6), 1025000 },
{ 1, { 1026000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x26 }, L2(6), 1025000 },
{ 0, { 1080000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x28 }, L2(15), 1075000 },
{ 1, { 1134000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x2A }, L2(15), 1075000 },
{ 0, { 1188000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x2C }, L2(15), 1100000 },
{ 1, { 1242000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x2E }, L2(15), 1100000 },
{ 0, { 1296000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x30 }, L2(15), 1125000 },
{ 1, { 1350000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x32 }, L2(15), 1125000 },
{ 0, { 1404000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x34 }, L2(15), 1137500 },
{ 1, { 1458000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x36 }, L2(15), 1137500 },
{ 1, { 1512000, HFPLL, 1, 0, 0x38 }, L2(15), 1150000 },
{ 0, { 0 } }
Turbotab said:
I've seen a lot of comments, about the possible battery size in the Nexus 5, which is only ~10% larger than a Nexus 4, which had OK, but not great battery life.
So the N5 is rumoured to have 2300 mAh 3.8v battery, the same size as the HTC One, a device with much better battery life than the N4. But what people are overlooking is the improvements in power efficiency from the Snapdragon 800, although it is a much faster SoC than the S4 Pro in the N4, it actually requires less voltage. This is possible due to TSMC's superior HPM 28nm process, which uses a technology called high-K metal gates, both the Snapdragon 600 & S4 Pro were manufactured on TSMC's 28nm LP process.
But, what if you don't believe me, well just look below. I compare the voltage tables for a S800 vs a S600, we must remember that S600 is an improved S4 Pro, these improvements included higher efficiency (battery life), so it's better than the S4 Pro in the Nexus 4.
28nm LP @ 1.7 GHz = 1075mv -- Snapdragon 600
28nm HPM @ 1.7 GHz = 900mv -- Snapdragon 800
So the S800 uses significantly less power, but achieves much greater performance. There is one outlier, the Adreno 330 GPU it of course is also built on the same superior HPM process, but contains more ALU (compute) units than any Adreno 320, so at max 100% usage may consume slightly more power. In the real world, the CPU/GPU do not sit at 100% all time, and the much faster S800 can complete a task eg load a webpage, faster than the Nexus 4, and then power down, whilst the N4 would still be rendering the webpage. This is a double win, faster ultimate performance means a task can be completed quicker, and the SoC put into low power mode, the fact that S800 needs less voltage in the first place magnifies the advantage.
Another possible power efficiency for the S800, is the on-die modem (baseband), unlike the S4 Pro / S600 which had a separate modem, we don't have hard data for this, but logic suggests that this a more efficient solution.
In conclusion using the 2300 mAh HTC One as a guide, which also has a 1080P display, older Snapdragon 600 and more software bloat than vanilla Android 4.4, I'd wager that the Nexus 5 will easily beat the Nexus 4 & HTC One for battery life. Of course we'd all love a a bigger battery, but given the incredible value of the Nexus phones, compromises have to be made, and I think battery life will be sufficient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also the much lower voltages will really help save the power to if you saw that earlier in the thread which also should help not make these things heat up so much.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk