Database Develop

What is a nightly Build?

Can anyone tell me what is a nightly build? Ive read over at the Development forum in the Cyonegen thread. there are mentions of a nightly build ROM. What is this?
Thanks in advance

If my definition if correct, it's one that is still being worked on. Not like a regular one with a few bugs. This is like a build before they would announce it a beta/rc.
Kinda like an underground build for only the advanced

Yes. Its the 'current build'. Another way to look at it - better two beta builds.

my understanding of nightly builds are that those builds are not supported in any way, they are experimental. flashing them on our phones=120% our responsibility even if it crashes. u find links at some places but i guess theres a reason for it to not be out in the open.

Nightly build = An automatic build from a codebase.
Simple as that. Implies it's untested, and yes, could eat babies as the other replies imply.

In software development, a neutral build is a build that reflects the current state of the source code checked into the source code version control system by the developers, but without any developer-specific changes.
A nightly build is a neutral build that takes place automatically. These typically take place when no one is likely to be working in the office so that there are no changes to the source code during the build. The results of the build are inspected by the arriving programmers, who generally place a priority on ensuring the recent changes to the source code have not broken the build process or functionality of the software.
When someone says a developer "broke the build", they are effectively saying that a developer checked in code which might very well have compiled (and hopefully also run properly) in their account, but does not compile (and therefore, cannot be run) in anyone else's account. This is typically due to additional developer-specific changes that were either not checked in, or (in the case of environment variables, etc.) were modifications to systems not under revision control. One of the most common cases is remembering to check in all modified files, but forgetting to add newly created files to the repository. If the other developers check out the new code without being aware of the problem, their work may grind to a halt while they wait for the problem to be fixed (or try to fix it themselves, which can be even more problematic, if multiple developers attempt to fix the issue at the same time). This naturally can result in a significant loss of productivity.
Neutral builds are important for software development processes running at high loads with short schedules; not having them means that any build that needs to be created for the Software Quality Assurance department has to be created using code which may be in the middle of major modifications, and which would best be left out of a build for testing (particularly a build being evaluated for possible release).
Neutral builds can be done on a machine which is also used for active development if enough caution is taken, but it is safer to dedicate a machine to that purpose because an issue in the build process could cause the machine to become unstable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nightly_build

Thank you everyone!!

Not sure if this is where to ask.....…but if you load the latest nightly tenderloin build for my touchpad, do you need any of the previous builds I still have not loaded
?????

sonnyford said:
Not sure if this is where to ask.....…but if you load the latest nightly tenderloin build for my touchpad, do you need any of the previous builds I still have not loaded
?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app

Chromium said:
No.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply. Where can I ask if I can unload the old web is I still have in my touchpad that is now shared with the android system you guys helped me install? Thanks again for all the help

sonnyford said:
Thanks for the reply. Where can I ask if I can unload the old web is I still have in my touchpad that is now shared with the android system you guys helped me install? Thanks again for all the help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, Im not sure what youre asking. Could you please clarify.

Chromium said:
Sorry, Im not sure what youre asking. Could you please clarify.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a HP touch pad that I was able to load android on with the help of all the xda information. My 1st question is, i have both the android and the original web os still installed. How can I wipe out the web os?
2nd I was finally able to load one of the last nightlys and I am having some issues. i see there are 2 releases and I have downloaded 1 but I have not been able to loade It

sonnyford said:
I have a HP touch pad that I was able to load android on with the help of all the xda information. My 1st question is, i have both the android and the original web os still installed. How can I wipe out the web os?
2nd I was finally able to load one of the last nightlys and I am having some issues. i see there are 2 releases and I have downloaded 1 but I have not been able to loade It
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah ok. This is the nexus one section, so I'll suggest that you post your questions here instead which is the q&a section meant specifically for your device. You will get better info there, rather than here.

[Q] [WIP] ICS on IncS

I've been trying to port over ICS from DHD but no success(ROM doesn't boot, stuck at HTC splash screen)
Since I'm a noob to ROM porting any help would be appreciated.
I followed a simple guide which told me to replace certain files in the boot.img and system folder along with a couple of files more.
I used the ICS rom of DHD and MIUI ICS rom for IncS.

cooljais said:
I've been trying to port over ICS from DHD but no success(ROM doesn't boot, stuck at HTC splash screen)
Since I'm a noob to ROM porting any help would be appreciated.
I followed a simple guide which told me to replace certain files in the boot.img and system folder along with a couple of files more.
I used the ICS rom of DHD and MIUI ICS rom for IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a suggestion for you...try the cm7 rom instead of miui ics build.
thanks for your effort. i will also dig about it but after my last exam. i request everyone who could contribute....its for our phone.
keep trying bro.

If it is simple enough I could give it a try, any moderate to advanced programming I wouldnt have a clue

I have been working on this over the last couple of days and so far my port has touchscreen, audio, RIL, wifi, 2D HW acceleration, notification LED and proxy sensor working (pretty much the same as the DHD port I think). Last I tried the microphone wasn't working for calls but it should be fixed in my new build.
I will post it up in the next couple of days once it's ready to be used. I've been busy with other things so haven't had a chance, plus I don't have access to the developer section yet.

st.matt said:
I have been working on this over the last couple of days and so far my port has touchscreen, audio, RIL, wifi, 2D HW acceleration, notification LED and proxy sensor working (pretty much the same as the DHD port I think). Last I tried the microphone wasn't working for calls but it should be fixed in my new build.
I will post it up in the next couple of days once it's ready to be used. I've been busy with other things so haven't had a chance, plus I don't have access to the developer section yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good job. if you need any help just let us know. i will try to look into it today night positively.

Anyone got any guides/tutorials kinda stuff for this?

Nopes, no tuts as such... just small guides....

Any links??
Keen to see how much of your port is working so far as well
EDIT: just tried it myself using a guide in other thread. used the DHD beta 3 and vivo latest CM7 nightly and is stuck at htc splashscreen
EDIT2: didnt sign the rom before, lets try that again...
EDIT3: still stuck on splashscreen

I will post my port up later tonight. I had a chance to do a bit of work on it and it's pretty good right now but the market is broken for some reason.
Once I get that working (and hopefully bluetooth as that shouldn't be hard) then I will upload it.

st.matt said:
I will post my port up later tonight. I had a chance to do a bit of work on it and it's pretty good right now but the market is broken for some reason.
Once I get that working (and hopefully bluetooth as that shouldn't be hard) then I will upload it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good, what ROMs did you use to port it?

st.matt said:
I will post my port up later tonight. I had a chance to do a bit of work on it and it's pretty good right now but the market is broken for some reason.
Once I get that working (and hopefully bluetooth as that shouldn't be hard) then I will upload it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like a nice birthday gift... ;D

Unfortunately I wasn't able to get market working.. but anyway here is the first Alpha.
It is based on a combination of the Desire HD build and using the kernel by TwistedUmbrella. I have a device setup to work with TwistedUmbrella's ICS tree but I don't know if it will 100% build successfully at this stage (takes forever to build on my 5 year old computer..). All credits go to the DHD guys as they have done basically everything, I've just made it work (or at least, most of it) on the vivo.
Working:
- Hardware 2D/3D Hacks
- Touchscreen
- Bluetooth
- Wifi (not tethering)
- RIL
- Data
- Sound
- Sensors
- Rotation
- Status LED
Not Working:
- Hardware video acceleration
- Tethering
- UMS (use adb instead)
- USB tethering
- Camera
- Google account (so Gmail, Market all not working)
The account error seems to be something to do with xt_qtaguid.. here is the log info:
Code:
I/qtaguid ( 3029): Failed write_ctrl(u -1) res=-1 errno=9
I/qtaguid ( 3029): Untagging socket -1 failed errno=-9
I/GLSUser ( 3029): GLS error: NetworkError
Might be a problem with the kernel, but I'm not really sure. Any help would be nice, I've spent about 5 hours on this and gotten nowhere.
Link: http://www.multiupload.com/Z4JKSC1JK2
Please don't post bugs reports just yet. This is the first alpha, it's not really a daily driver and I know that there are bugs. Post fixes instead.

Sounds awesome Matt! what are you using to break down and build the rom??
Will give it a go in the morning and post any other feedback

Nice work you got slot further than I did! I will see if I can contribute anything to your build once I have it installed.
The Desire S version is pretty good, and the hardware is almost identical to the Inc S, maybe that would make for a better base?
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium

l0st.prophet said:
Nice work you got slot further than I did! I will see if I can contribute anything to your build once I have it installed.
The Desire S version is pretty good, and the hardware is almost identical to the Inc S, maybe that would make for a better base?
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's probably not a bad idea. I will see if I have time tonight to try and see if I can get market working by using some of the desire s stuff.. or maybe someone else could try as well.
For anyone that gives it a go, just keep in mind that the button backlight levels are in framework-res.apk, and will need to be recompiled from source or decompiled and edited to get the levels right.
P1n3apqlExpr3ss said:
Sounds awesome Matt! what are you using to break down and build the rom??
Will give it a go in the morning and post any other feedback
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well so I have checked out TwistedUmbrella's ICS tree and 7x30 kernel, and have made a vivo config for both. I've then used the prebuilt DHD ICS rom and taken out the DHD stuff and put in stuff from the vivo Miui.us rom. Then I've just gone through and fixed the boot ramdisk, built the kernel and put it together for the boot image.
In future I will try building from source, but as I said it takes a very long time for me.

st.matt said:
Well so I have checked out TwistedUmbrella's ICS tree and 7x30 kernel, and have made a vivo config for both. I've then used the prebuilt DHD ICS rom and taken out the DHD stuff and put in stuff from the vivo Miui.us rom. Then I've just gone through and fixed the boot ramdisk, built the kernel and put it together for the boot image.
In future I will try building from source, but as I said it takes a very long time for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This sounds WAY over my head, all I tried was unzipping CM nightly 146 and the DHD build and changing files, rezipping and signing it. No wonder I got stuck at the HTC splashscreen...
Keep up the good work

st.matt said:
Unfortunately I wasn't able to get market working.. but anyway here is the first Alpha.
It is based on a combination of the Desire HD build and using the kernel by TwistedUmbrella. I have a device setup to work with TwistedUmbrella's ICS tree but I don't know if it will 100% build successfully at this stage (takes forever to build on my 5 year old computer..). All credits go to the DHD guys as they have done basically everything, I've just made it work (or at least, most of it) on the vivo.
Working:
- Hardware 2D/3D Hacks
- Touchscreen
- Bluetooth
- Wifi (not tethering)
- RIL
- Data
- Sound
- Sensors
- Rotation
- Status LED
Not Working:
- Hardware video acceleration
- Tethering
- UMS (use adb instead)
- USB tethering
- Camera
- Google account (so Gmail, Market all not working)
The account error seems to be something to do with xt_qtaguid.. here is the log info:
Code:
I/qtaguid ( 3029): Failed write_ctrl(u -1) res=-1 errno=9
I/qtaguid ( 3029): Untagging socket -1 failed errno=-9
I/GLSUser ( 3029): GLS error: NetworkError
Might be a problem with the kernel, but I'm not really sure. Any help would be nice, I've spent about 5 hours on this and gotten nowhere.
Link: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/52030869/vivo_ics.zip
Please don't post bugs reports just yet. This is the first alpha, it's not really a daily driver and I know that there are bugs. Post fixes instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great job bro! just need the camera and gmail account. rest everything is perfect ! i will try it today and see. thanks for your efforts

Download link not working... Too much traffic :/
Sent from my Incredible S using XDA App

Splux said:
Download link not working... Too much traffic :/
Sent from my Incredible S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes its not working. can we get other links please?

Yeah sorry I didn't realise dropbox imposed download limits. Here is another download link: http://www.multiupload.com/Z4JKSC1JK2
I think I may have fixed Google accounts though, so there might be another download in another 30 minutes or so.

[ROM][P6800][OnHold]Ubuntu-touch dev preview(18.03.2013)

I have put this project on hold for now. I flashed latest Austrian ICS build to my device and continue using it as my Kindle reader on my travels. IF somone manages to fix the two issues with kernel, send me a message and I'll continue working with the repository. But for now I'm not thinking nor touching the subject before Easter. Thank you for participating for now
I've started porting Ubuntu-touch dev-preview to the Galaxy Tab 7.7 (3g). If you do not understand it already, you flash this at your own risk. There is now also a Ubuntu-touch specific device page here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices/p6800. I'll try to keep this thread and the Ubuntu devices page as close to each other as possible.
Big thanks to Daniel_hk for helping with boot.img Now It can be booted, but the screen is still black
Also, without working wifi and display, the preview is basically unusable... Next steps should be these:
1. Get wifi drivers working.
2. Get display drivers working.
Code:
[email protected]:/# uname -a
Linux localhost 3.0.15-CM-g1dc3074 #2 SMP PREEMPT Wed Mar 13 00:43:37 EET 2013 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
Repositories:
Latest release tagged with: "v0.3", not tested!
https://github.com/dun1982/android_device_samsung_p6800
https://github.com/dun1982/android_kernel_samsung_p6800
Download
cm-10.1-20130312-UNOFFICIAL-p6800.zip
Daily Ubuntu image: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch-preview/daily-preinstalled/current/
Installation
Install CWM 6.0.2.8
Wipe data/factory reset
Wipe cache partition
Flash cm-10.1-20130312-UNOFFICIAL-p6800.zip to device
Flash quantal-preinstalled-phablet-armhf.zip to device
Reboot
Starting to use
Then it gets interesting (Black sreen for now now Run the following commands in your desktop system:
Code:
adb root
adb shell
ubuntu_chroot shell
You should have now root access inside your tabled. Continue with this wiki next
What works
Ubuntu-touch dev-preview is flashable.
It boots!
Known Issues
Kernel is based to the CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_smdk4210, but it is a mess. So forked it, took code here and there (mostly from locerra's JB build).
Kernel is based 3.0.15 and no newer one available (yet).
Most of the drivers in kernel had to be turned off, because build was not succeeding...
bluetooth: Doesn't work
audio: Dock audio doesn't work.
hwcomposer: HDMI dongle doesn't work.
wifi: Doesn't work.
camera: Doesn't work.
.. and lot of kernel level bugs for sure.
Displaydrivers are not working (yet).
Release notes
Version 0.2 (13.03.2013) - Now it boots, see release notes
Version 0.1 (07.03.2013) - Intial release, nothing works
Credits
BIG THANKS to daniel_hk for solving the boot.img problem for me.
Anyone who has worked previously with the device/kernel source.
locerra (for getting CM10.1 to flashable state).

wowww!!! thank you !test now:victory::victory:

Placeholder for future.

Re: [ROM][P6800]Ubuntu-touch dev preview(02.03.2013)
Not 6810 versión?
AUs

el_campi said:
Not 6810 versión?
AUs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot test it for anything else. The kernel sources are from CM10.1 that was in use from locerra, so in theory it should work with i815 and with p6810 as well. But I cannot give you any guarantees...
And also before I get this build to even start with my device, I do not think that sharing image would help anyone. But if you are a developer, I would like to talk with you on issues that I might have missed or done wrong. So contact me

Re: [ROM][P6800]Ubuntu-touch dev preview(02.03.2013)
any update?
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium

Not much. The generated image is missing /data/ubuntu completely and that is the reason why the image does not boot. I got also flu and fewer, so I have had not that much time after the weekend to look on the issues on that.
I'm also waiting if I get any answers from Ubuntu touch emailing list regarding the problem and where to look for answers, but my quess is that it has something to do with the devices fstab file...

Good news everyone!
Just got a very good answer the problem I had with the /data/ubuntu-folder missing from the image. There was no image provided for the actual Ubuntu at all by the build-process...
When I get home from work, I'll try to find time to look into the build process if I can include the actual Ubuntu image to the ready made image and then release it after I get my device to boot. But it seems that I got the right nudge forward for this now :highfive:

Hmpf, still not booting. Now the /data/ubuntu logs are unmodified, which would point towards kernel or fstab-issue (ie. /data/ubuntu is never used...).

Re: [ROM][P6800]Ubuntu-touch dev preview(02.03.2013)
Good job :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my GT-p6800 using xda premium

Doh... still not working... Any ideas anyone?

Ok, new version build from different repositories (thx, danile_hk for tip).
I'll test the new image this evening when I get back to home, and I have my fingers crossed that I can get the device to boot up and even display something useful. After that I can start looking for ubuntu developemnt

New version did not work, but then Daniel_hk gave me working boot.img. So now I need to find out what the heck is wrong with my repository and fix it so that I can get working boot.img from start and also the device configuration has issues. Both repositories are currently out of sync I'm afraid

dun1982 said:
New version did not work, but then Daniel_hk gave me working boot.img. So now I need to find out what the heck is wrong with my repository and fix it so that I can get working boot.img from start and also the device configuration has issues. Both repositories are currently out of sync I'm afraid
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also, without working wifi and display, the preview is basically unusable... Next steps should be these:
1. Get wifi drivers working.
2. Get display drivers working.

It seems that I hit the wall (again) with the mentioned big issues.
For now, I keep some sabbatical from Ubuntu Touch things (ie. I flashed ICS Austria to my device) and use it as my Kindle reader again.
If by miracle I get more info regarding how to get the Kernel working with Ubuntu Touch, then by allmeans I continue working with this project. So far it just seems that making a working image, is out of my hands currently.

At least you had a go. Thanks for your efforts, and hope you might have another crack at it later on.
I'm feeling a little bit that way right now too, and put my ICS kernel on the back burner. I think I'm trying to multitask a little too much at times....
Yep, a break is what you need, maybe some clarity will come after you've had a chance to recharge.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

It's very nice to see you took up the big responsibility to make this superb device to be usable again! it has great specs, really. KUDOS bro!!

Any update on this development?

ZhenMing said:
Any update on this development?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not much, I have had no interest to spend time with this topic because I have been very busy IRL. After I get my new house renovated fully and get my job tasks done, I wont be spending much time with this project. Feel free to use any sources provided in this thread to further advance the subject.
But this wont go forward that much, if the GT-P6800 wont get official CM10.1 update...

It works?

Topics and questions regarding compiling AOSP based Roms vs other sources like CM

I have decided to rework the thread to ovoid any confusion as the intent of posting this thread was to ask questions about compiling custom Roms from AOSP source that someone like myself who gained their development experience on other devices that building from pure AOSP code was not an option and are not as familiar working with AOSP. In the past my own experience comes from using and modifying for example the Cyanogenmod source so after attempting to now base my Rom on AOSP this time around with Lollipop have run into a few unfamiliar differences. As each question or topic is addressed I will update the Op. The hope is not only will I find solutions or answers to my own questions but that others in the same position will also be able to find use of the discussions posted in this thread.
Compiling the AOSP source into a format that can be safely flashed using a custom recovery. This was a 3 part question the first was just simply how to compile AOSP in a format other then .img files that can be flashed using a custom recovery without the need of flashing through fastboot or needing to use the adb sideload option.
1, Compiling AOSP into the for of an update.zip.
This was answered in short by know.patience by suggesting to use the “make otapackage” command in place of "make" to start the build. Was also made aware that a few modifications would need to be made to avoid producing an update package that does not use the new block format but instead the old style zips we are most used to seeing.
2, Now can create an update.zip using the “make otapackage” command ran into an issue that by flashing the update.zip produced would in the process replace the custom recovery used to flash with the Nexus Stock recovery. This was answered by Lethargy who suggested and provided a Link for the following commit.
For getting rid of the AOSP recovery:
https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/48521e167c642db76c9d4f52b1c63f9abc7f707f
https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/1d9224bd45ef2b4f5601a157de2bfe3bb1c95558
3, Now can create an update.zip using the “make otapackage” and after applying the above commit are now able to flash the update.zip without replacing the recovery Lethargy also provided links for the following commits.
To get rid of the block-based zip format:
https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/4d458300d935a3a9d893a590286cb578dcf54db2
You'll also want to make sure you have this commit so it doesn't flash awfully slow in recovery (8~ minutes, but only around 1-2 minutes with this commit):
https://github.com/Lethargy/android_system_extras/commit/52f8d5fc3edfacd112827d0a41516c1dc5f4a468
This one isn't required but you may as well:
https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/242be9ae4f05e3cb1d39d635cac7147ff904700c
Compiling using the AOSP Master branch vs release branches. In following the directions provided on the Google development site are given the command for downloading the source code using the Master branch. Using the Master branch as apposed to a release branch such as android-5.0.2_r1 or lower have found that the source compiles just fine but have run into one issue and just a general question that a little explanation would be helpful for general understanding of the AOSP Master branch.
The issue is that after flashing a Rom compiled using the Master branch everything in the Rom works as expected other than the radio. I have so far using the same exact vendor blobs as compiling a release branch have not had a signal and baseband version is listed under about phone as unknown.
The general question is that the android version listed compiling a Rom using the Master branch is version 5.0.50.50.50.50. In general I have yet to understand what this version number represents and very little to no information available via the Google Box.
Between the both I now wounder if the Master branch is intended for actual use or if so what changes are required so the baseband version is recognized and radio / Ril will work?
Quick Answer:
Google first commits new code into master and then is later tagged with an update for realease so in generall many things can be broken and the master branch is and not intended to be stable so if building from master expect that things will be broke or buggy.
Compiling Rom and Kernel together. For those of us again used to compiling using say the CM code are now used to compiling the Kernel along with the rest of the code. I know it is easy to just compile the Kernel and include in the device tree but for those of us who would still like the Kernel compiles with the rest of the code there is no information available on the Google Developers site for doing so and there seems to be a few differences as have tried just using the lines used in the CM Hammerhead device repository. I have come across these commits from Cl3Kener that should help. Hate posting other developers code but is on Github so is there for the public at large. So far have only tested as is so will update if finding not all changes are necessary or can be modified.
Inline Kernel Building
https://github.com/OptiPop/device_lge_hammerhead/commit/7de8fd95b6df16cb6311161d5048874d69cf1cb1
https://github.com/OptiPop/device_lge_hammerhead/commit/87768896f4eb8fcd989ce3b8492ca65305513851
https://github.com/OptiPop/device_lge_hammerhead/commit/5460eb3aa76ea5d813f64a3b3bab6ace1be6de68
Adding Pre-Built APK's
Seems Sprint users need a few apk's for updating prl and what not that are included into the Stock release but are not part of the AOSP code. For some reason through vendor or even device have tried adding these apk's into the build. First try I created a sprint vendor section and received a few errors untill learning would need to add sprint into a vendor white list found in build. Will post link to file later. After found the extra "Services.jar" I found in the stock image not found in the aosp compiled Rom did copy into the build but the apk's had not. Looking in the other vendor blobs noticed lge adds "qcrilmsgtunnel.apk" so followed the example and even tried just adding the other spk's into lge expanding the list used for adding in "qcrilmsgtunnel.apk" but still no luck. Also have tried adding through the device files for Hammerhead just to get them into the Rom for testing and still no luck. If this was CM or any other Rom not using pure aosp this would have been a 5 minut project so need to do some aditional homework.
Again think this thread could be a good resource for developers who are new to building their Roms around AOSP so wanted to include everything I run into during the process of moving away from using a heavily modified CM based code as the base of my Rom to using AOSP in its place so developers who are or in the same process or for those in the future can use as a resource to quickly adjusting. I have been building CM based Roms like Starship for years and after hours of working on other aspects to suddenly be stumped by these small differences between platforms can be very frustrating.

to the OP:
answer to your first question comes in two parts.
a) use 'make -j# otapackage' will generate a zip that is flashable in custom recovery.
b) if you plan on adding other files after the zip is made, you will need this info here:
https://github.com/android/platform_build/commit/26e6619c37e294fe2ee63aaa759e0ac861775ce8
There are some modifications needed to generate the OG zip files instead of the new "block" format.
Google hasn't released the 5.0.1 image for the N5 but that doesn't mean you can't build it and install it yourself. I'm running it and it seems okay to me so far although I'm hardly an expert.

simms22 said:
op.. this section is only for developers, to get work done. if you have questions, they belong in the q&a section. you arent new, you should know this. again, this section is only for developers, mot for the normal xda folk to post questions. you have a q&a section just for asking questions. please, ask a mod to move your thread there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am building a customized AOSP Rom I am interested in sharing so was looking for help or direction in creating an update zip that can be flashed in a custom recovery like TWRP. I am not used to compiling AOSP and with the help of know.patience in the first reply am now able to compile an update.zip I can flash in TWRP but in doing so it also replaces TWRP with the Stock recovery. I have still been using the .img files to flash personally but am still trying to figure out how to solve the recovery replacement issue. I still have other features I am adding and testing before I would like to post my work but before I get to that point I still need to figure out my recovery replacement issue. Maybe using the words personal use may have been confusing but at the moment until ready I have only been using my work personally but would like to at some point post and share. I also have work that is not AOSP based I am sharing in the Android Development section but I have been building CM and other source based Roms and sharing for years. This is the first device I have been able to build AOSP and still have a few things to figure out before sharing any of my AOSP based work. I am otherwise not sure why you think these are questions for general Q&A.
I started this thread in Android Development as there was only about 4 posts in this section and I see many AOSP based Roms in Android Development who's developers obviously know the answers to my questions so tried to get away posting there in hope one of these developers could help or like in the first response point me in the direction of a commit before the thread was moved by a mod into this section. Do you think someone in the general Q&A section is better equipped to help answer questions about compiling an AOSP based Rom in the form of an update.zip that can be flashed in TWRP without also replacing TWRP with the Stock recovery?? Would also be nice knowing what changes in the code need to be made in compiling an old style update.zip that does not use the new block format. This would be a bonus but overall not %100 needed as instead of moving files around after the code has been compiled have added init.d support and first have all the files I want moved into a staging directory and then form an init,d bash script to move the files during first boot and remove those that are not needed like this example I used in my CM based version of the Rom I am trying to update for AOSP for 5.0.
https://github.com/Starship-Android/android_device_starship-common/blob/cm-11.0/app-update
https://github.com/Starship-Android/android_device_starship-common/blob/cm-11.0/cleanup
I must seriously be underestimating the knowledge and in general the types of questions being asked and answered in the general Q&A section.
Honestly if not for the amount of times thanked I would think this comment was not so much about helping or community but more about someone trying to puff themselves up by trying to appear important by making decisions about what questions are worthy of being asked but judging by the number of times they have been helpful I am thinking its either a case of not reading or understanding the question being asked or my own inability to express my questions in the proper manor. Either way its definitely not about taking up resources in a section with less than 10 total posts. The frustrating part as a community as I like to believe we are all in is that why I worked on other parts in updating my Rom had expected that at least more than one developer out of all the AOSP based Roms posted in the development section would have helped me with this one part. Its not like I am asking how to be a developer just a resource to help with two simple things I am sure I could have figured out and will most likely still figure out without any help. Overall my thoughts behind posting this question was that why I am working to figure out something a bit more time consuming at least more than one person would be helpful enough to copy and past a commit.
XDA is weird in that with other devices all the developers would join a team and start a shared group of repository’s for one another to use in trying to make the best possible experience and options for everyone. For example in the op I posted an example of hours of work I did showing what libraries are needed by one another just so others could use it also in trying to port as much as possible for in that case the Galaxy Mini. Then with other devices like seems to be the case with the N5 its all about competition and what I am starting to call the smartest person in the room syndrome. Its just a shame there are only 5 maybe 6 threads posted in this section and I think that says allot about the community in general. So many good things could come about if we just tried to be helpful and pull as much knowledge together as we could. Anyhow think its time for ending this rant.

chairshot215 said:
compiling an AOSP based Rom in the form of an update.zip that can be flashed in TWRP without also replacing TWRP with the Stock recovery?? Would also be nice knowing what changes in the code need to be made in compiling an old style update.zip that does not use the new block format.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To get rid of the block-based zip format: https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/4d458300d935a3a9d893a590286cb578dcf54db2
You'll also want to make sure you have this commit so it doesn't flash awfully slow in recovery (8~ minutes, but only around 1-2 minutes with this commit): https://github.com/Lethargy/android_system_extras/commit/52f8d5fc3edfacd112827d0a41516c1dc5f4a468
This one isn't required but you may as well: https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/242be9ae4f05e3cb1d39d635cac7147ff904700c
For getting rid of the AOSP recovery: https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/48521e167c642db76c9d4f52b1c63f9abc7f707f then https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/1d9224bd45ef2b4f5601a157de2bfe3bb1c95558

Lethargy said:
To get rid of the block-based zip format: https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/4d458300d935a3a9d893a590286cb578dcf54db2
You'll also want to make sure you have this commit so it doesn't flash awfully slow in recovery (8~ minutes, but only around 1-2 minutes with this commit): https://github.com/Lethargy/android_system_extras/commit/52f8d5fc3edfacd112827d0a41516c1dc5f4a468
This one isn't required but you may as well: https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/242be9ae4f05e3cb1d39d635cac7147ff904700c
For getting rid of the AOSP recovery: https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/48521e167c642db76c9d4f52b1c63f9abc7f707f then https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/1d9224bd45ef2b4f5601a157de2bfe3bb1c95558
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you this is well beyond what I was looking for and don’t worry I make it a point not to send out PM's with questions that can be helpful for others as well. Otherwise would have blown up the AOSP Rom posters in development but thanks for the information.

chairshot215 said:
.. and don’t worry I make it a point not to send out PM's with questions that can be helpful for others as well..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you mean "I'll probably ignore you if you try asking for support over PM.", that's part of my forum signature.
If you need anything else feel free to @‬‬mention me in a thread, though.

I reworked the Op to avoid confusion as Mods have been moving the thread around into different sections. I personalty believe these questions are more geared towered development than general Q&A but at least at the moment I appear to be wrong about that. Never know though as in the past one day one of the mods may decide to move the thread back into its intended location but until then I guess these topics will be of better use to general users than developers.

chairshot215 said:
I reworked the Op to avoid confusion as Mods have been moving the thread around into different sections. I personalty believe these questions are more geared towered development than general Q&A but at least at the moment I appear to be wrong about that. Never know though as in the past one day one of the mods may decide to move the thread back into its intended location but until then I guess these topics will be of better use to general users than developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should include the other commit (https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/1d9224bd45ef2b4f5601a157de2bfe3bb1c95558) which fixes building since the first one results in "IndentationError: unexpected indent".

Lethargy said:
You should include the other commit (https://github.com/Lethargy/android_build/commit/1d9224bd45ef2b4f5601a157de2bfe3bb1c95558) which fixes building since the first one results in "IndentationError: unexpected indent".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the heads up, when testing these I also cherry picked a few other things that looked related. Have to double check but may have forked the repository’s from you so would receive credit if anyone decided to look over my repository’s. Well overall my personal Github has been pretty bare as in the past most work was done on more obscure Virgin Mobile devices with only a few developers so we would pretty much create an organization for all the developers to use.
https://github.com/MTDEV-CM7
https://github.com/MTDEV-CM10
https://github.com/vmobi-triumph
https://github.com/MTDEV-KERNEL
https://github.com/MTDEV-MIUIv4
https://github.com/MTCM9
https://github.com/MTCM10
https://github.com/HTCCM9
https://github.com/HTCCM10
https://github.com/HTCStarShip
https://github.com/HTCUbuntu
https://github.com/vmobi-shooter
https://github.com/vmobi-gogh
These days have been keeping everything under Starship-Android.
https://github.com/Starship-Android
Have 2 other members listed who I had worked with in the past but has otherwise been a solo organization with one of the other members who decided on going with the Moto X and Verizon over the N5 and showed little interest in his 2012 version of the N7 as it was intended for being a Nexus only device line up and the second being my Kernel Guru from a few devices back who mainly joined to help me out with a few things but ultimately what I am getting around to is this is the first time working %100 solo. Have to say without having anyone to bounce off ideas and share findings with things definitely move much slower and take a bit of getting used to. Is also the reason for starting threads like this. Most of this stuff looking in the developer section appeared to be pretty common knowledge but having never worked from pure AOSP before was slowing down other development for about a week just to figure out what seemed like half the community had already known and with what probably took at the most 5 or 10 minutes of copying and pasting commits probably saved me a weekend of sifting through github and testing. I hope by creating a thread like this will be able to do the same for others.

Hi guys,
Anyone manage to fix RIL problems with master branch?
I also build AOSP roms so for sure i will hangout here
Sent from my AOSP on HammerHead using XDA Free mobile app

malcho said:
Hi guys,
Anyone manage to fix RIL problems with master branch?
I also build AOSP roms so for sure i will hangout here
Sent from my AOSP on HammerHead using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never tried.

ODEXED
i am successfully build cm12 with fully odexed. now i like to odex some prebuilt apk also but LOCAL_DEX_PREOPT=true not odexing prebuilt apk. can somebody help me? already DEX_PREOPT=true working fine.

soorajj said:
i am successfully build cm12 with fully odexed. now i like to odex some prebuilt apk also but LOCAL_DEX_PREOPT=true not odexing prebuilt apk. can somebody help me? already DEX_PREOPT=true working fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you need to odex a prebuilt apk?
Not sure if what you want is even possible.
But if odexing your prebuilt apk is necessary then why not odex it then include the .odex with the prebuilt?

Lethargy said:
Why do you need to odex a prebuilt apk?
Not sure if what you want is even possible.
But if odexing your prebuilt apk is necessary then why not odex it then include the .odex with the prebuilt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
suppose i want to odex gapps. how to?

malcho said:
Hi guys,
Anyone manage to fix RIL problems with master branch?
I also build AOSP roms so for sure i will hangout here
Sent from my AOSP on HammerHead using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing so far, I downloaded the master and 5.0.2_r1 branches and have loaded both in meld for looking over differences but have not yet identified from the dif between the 2 branches that is responsible for ril working in release branch but not master. Still have allot to look over though still. Still have not found a decent explanation of the master branch to know if its recommended to build from but still just for Knowledge sake am interested in knowing. At first thought maybe apn's but not so sure with baseband also listed as unknown from my Master branch builds.

chairshot215 said:
Nothing so far, I downloaded the master and 5.0.2_r1 branches and have loaded both in meld for looking over differences but have not yet identified from the dif between the 2 branches that is responsible for ril working in release branch but not master. Still have allot to look over though still. Still have not found a decent explanation of the master branch to know if its recommended to build from but still just for Knowledge sake am interested in knowing. At first thought maybe apn's but not so sure with baseband also listed as unknown from my Master branch builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as i know all the patches goes to master branch then from this branch ,if they are ok,is distributed to lower branches.I also didn't find info why is named as 5.0.50.50.I will try to investigate this ril problem

malcho said:
As far as i know all the patches goes to master branch then from this branch ,if they are ok,is distributed to lower branches.I also didn't find info why is named as 5.0.50.50.I will try to investigate this ril problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks will definitely update the Op with any findings. Was very surprised to find the thread again as it has now been moved 4 times by 4 different Mods, some bounce it to general Q&A and then is bounced back here by another. I understand its not comprised of the most advanced development topics but with that said is still way more advanced than the topics being discussed by general users over in the general Q&A section. I had just thought it would be a nice one stop place for learning the basics of AOSP development. With the constant moving and scolding messages being received one would think the threads very existence is up there with crossing the streams and threatens the existence of Android development.

@chairshot215 Thank you for starting this thread. Thank you @Lethargy for all of your insight. I like to do my own perosnal builds every once in a while for my nexus devices. What I have observed over the years is that the Master Branch will sometimes have funky version numbers like you have described. One thing to consider is what @malcho mentioned. If all commits indeed go there first before the respective branches(although this may not entirely be the case), then it is likely that some things may be broken in the master branch from time to time, hence the ril problem. I think with the galaxy nexus I ended up running into issues from time to time with the master branch, and from there learned to build for specific branches/tags. For instance, there are times when items within a specific branch will be ahead of master in some areas and behind it in others, as in this link to platform_build for lollipop release https://github.com/android/platform_build/tree/lollipop-release. So with that, it is probably in our best interests to just use specific branches.

Milly7 said:
@chairshot215 Thank you for starting this thread. Thank you @Lethargy for all of your insight. I like to do my own perosnal builds every once in a while for my nexus devices. What I have observed over the years is that the Master Branch will sometimes have funky version numbers like you have described. One thing to consider is what @malcho mentioned. If all commits indeed go there first before the respective branches(although this may not entirely be the case), then it is likely that some things may be broken in the master branch from time to time, hence the ril problem. I think with the galaxy nexus I ended up running into issues from time to time with the master branch, and from there learned to build for specific branches/tags. For instance, there are times when items within a specific branch will be ahead of master in some areas and behind it in others, as in this link to platform_build for lollipop release https://github.com/android/platform_build/tree/lollipop-release. So with that, it is probably in our best interests to just use specific branches.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the response and have definitely learned its better building from branches with a release tag. Still very curious why and how the branches are structured so thanks for the explanations.

Way totally off topic for the thread but landed a brand new SSD and decided to install everything fresh. After everything was set back up and wanted to start building I ran my usual,
-j'grep 'processor' /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l'
a very old habit before fully understanding what number to use after -j so used grep to figure it out based on Googles recommendation. The command did not work so removed the grep and just made it -j4 but also with 0 success. At first just figued I missed somthing setting everything back up and "make" is just not working but wrong again as running "make" command without -j of any number works just fine.
Also tried this with CM12 as I am doing 2 versions of my Starship Rom. One from AOSP and one using CM. Figured AOSP would be special for Nexus users why also having a version for CM I can make most changes by adding a Starship Device Tree could easily port the Rom to any device running CM supported or not.
https://github.com/Starship-Android/android_device_starship-common/tree/cm-12.0
Also found why compiling CM that -j also results in an error
Invalid lunch combo: cm_hammerhead--j4
No such item in brunch menu. Try 'breakfast'
So far have not found anything using the Google Box so figured may as well ask. If have not figured out by now I have no shame in asking questions. Oddly enough that is for things that are probably relatively simple. Took a better part of a week figuring out how to start CM using the Now Launcher and setting up init.d bash scripts for moving around and replacing libs after learning the Gapps package includes libs that will not work so the solution needed to be that the CM Gapps package libs needed to be replaced with either stock or libs pulled after installing the Now Launcher from the Play Store after flashing Gapps and the Rom staring. Also then what if user updates and wipes the system partition after the new and updated llibs have been moved into place. Anyhow point of story is things like this I will just figure out without bothering anyone but for the cant believe I need to stop what I am working on to figure out something most likely very simple and can be answered with very little time spent I have no shame in just asking. Not that someone else’s time is less important but like I have mentioned before is frustrating just after spending hours or days figuring out something asked in dozens of threads is just frustrating getting caught up or loosing momentum and thought processes over something so simple there are little resources available. Also I assume most devs have the same experience when you have an idea or thought behind resolving an issue that once you stop and change direction it just sometimes never comes back and that short time you had I guess can be called an epiphany is gone once going back. Otherwise thats how I justify asking dumb ars questions.

[ROM] cm-11-20150226-UNOFFICIAL-thor

Hi,
Here is CM-11 (Android 4.4.4) for the kindle fire hdx 7" (THOR). You need a rooted hdx 7" (Thor) device with a firmware < 3.2.4 (3.2.3.2 ideally) and a signed recovery.
Todo
Bluetooth not working
Wifi won't correctly load when disabled at boot, a reboot is required
Minimal headphone volume too loud -> fixed
Incorrect color format in some scenario's ? (YouTube) -> fixed
Changelogs/Downloads
cm-11-20150226-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
Updated to amazon 4.5.3 binaries
Fully disable radio for now (thanks Andy-Voigt)
Fix twrp fstab (enabling twrp was breaking system rom to boot)
CM sources updated to 20150226
cm-11-20150219-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
CM sources updated to 20150219
cm-11-20150219-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
fix minimal video/media volume too high (youtube...)
switch back to tablet build
CM sources updated to 20150110
cm-11-20150108-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
Fix thermal engine (should give better battery life and performances)
Fix a lot of proprietary services (proprietary logs, acdb-loader, ril loading ...)
Set media volume steps to 100 instead 15 (allow finer volume control essentially for jack output)
Lowered minimal screen brightness
CM sources updated to 20150108
cm-11-20150107-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
Build without "hacks" (add Cuber signing and custom updater-script generation)
CM sources updated to 20150107
Enable telephony (will probably not work)
cm-11-20150101-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
use patched boot/recovery, thanks to @vortox
fix wrong color format ! (major bug resolved)
switch to kernel sources
cm-11-20141218-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
minors fixes
cm-11-20141217-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
fix wifi not reloading
fix overlay/rotation screen tearing
cm-11-20141216-UNOFFICIAL-thor.zip
updated binaries to amz 4.5.2
properly use precompiled kernel and headers (amz 4.5.2)
fix minimal audio volume too high
add safestrap compatibility
Sources
android_device_amazon_thor
android_device_amazon_hdx-common
hardware_qcom_display-caf-hdx
hardware_qcom_audio-caf-hdx
hardware_qcom_media-caf-hdx

I'm sure the community here respects all of the work that you do. My post in the other thread was not intended to "get you in trouble". There are a set of rules that every user has to follow, regardless of their contributions to the community. That being said, when I was a newer member, I accidentally broke the rules a couple of times (nothing major) and didn't want the same to happen to someone else. (I never contacted @Divine_Madcat about your other thread, in case you were thinking I did.)

r3pwn said:
I'm sure the community here respects all of the work that you do. My post in the other thread was not intended to "get you in trouble". There are a set of rules that every user has to follow, regardless of their contributions to the community. That being said, when I was a newer member, I accidentally broke the rules a couple of times (nothing major) and didn't want the same to happen to someone else. (I never contacted @Divine_Madcat about your other thread, in case you were thinking I did.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep i was tinking to that... so I'm also sorry. The thing is i spent a lot, lot of time on this port, and Divine_Madcat didn't even give me the time to update the first thread with the needed files/informations and ignore my pm which was an offense to me. Well i have to complies to the rules too but was a little chocked on how the thread got mad. Well, let's hope it won't be the same here. So that said i have no problem with you !

Cpasjuste said:
Yep i was tinking to that... so I'm also sorry. The thing is i spent a lot, lot of time on this port, and Divine_Madcat didn't even give me the time to update the first thread with the needed files/informations and ignore my pm which was an offense to me. Well i have to complies to the rules too but was a little chocked on how the thread got mad. Well, let's hope it won't be the same here. So that said i have no problem with you !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While i am sorry you are upset, it was not a slight at you at all. While i do try to keep an eye on XDA while at work, my job does come first and foremost, and i was unable to handle anything here yesterday (what can i say, 12 hour work days suck). As it was, i have literally nothing against you; to be frank, the report on the thread was the first i had even seen.
From my perspective, we had a placeholder thread, which is not allowed, so it was closed. I fully intended to reopen it, but gave my reasons above...
Anyway, i do wish you luck, and i really dont have any ill will to you...

So....
Do we have unlocked bootloader or a root exploit for amazon firmware 4.5.2 soon? And do you have plan to release another for Apollo?
Thanks

tuanda82 said:
So....
Do we have unlocked bootloader or a root exploit for amazon firmware 4.5.2 soon? And do you have plan to release another for Apollo?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody knows. But there are a few people working on "unlocks" (at least booting an unsigned kernel). Maybe also jcase releases his unlock (which I doubt because of legal issues).

Hi!
I have rooted Kindle Thor. How do I install this nice piece of software?
Like the Nexus rom? Currently I am on 3.2.7...
Thanks
URBANsUNITED

URBANsUNITED said:
Hi!
I have rooted Kindle Thor. How do I install this nice piece of software?
Like the Nexus rom? Currently I am on 3.2.7...
Thanks
URBANsUNITED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to be on 4.5.2 and rooted.

cyablo said:
You need to be on 4.5.2 and rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mmmmmhhh
Than this rom is basically usless
Who has a 4.5.2 Base and Rooted??? I would do it if I'll get the tools, no fear of a brick
Too bad. But Nevertheless Many thanks for the work and effort!

URBANsUNITED said:
Mmmmmhhh
Than this rom is basically usless
Who has a 4.5.2 Base and Rooted??? I would do it if I'll get the tools, no fear of a brick
Too bad. But Nevertheless Many thanks for the work and effort!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a few Users which do have an unlocked Bootloader, this Rom is only for these Users, as stated in the first Post.

I decided to make the rom available in case i loose interest in this device (or if i ever die soon). This way when (if) a root exploit is available then you'll be ready to use it.

Ok... So if there IS a possibility to unlock the actual fireos, please give some hints, instead of publishings Roms that one or two users can install, the rest is completely helpless...
Sent from my Nexus HDX 7 using XDA Free mobile app

openWeb74 said:
Ok... So if there IS a possibility to unlock the actual fireos, please give some hints, instead of publishings Roms that one or two users can install, the rest is completely helpless...
Sent from my Nexus HDX 7 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sharing hundreds of hours of work is helpless/useless for you ?
You know what ? I actually spent the whole day on porting cm-10 to current exploitable kernel for YOU :/

Everybody chill , @openWeb74, i see your point @Cpasjuste , first let me thank you for all your work, I'm pretty sure its a great Rom!
What openweb said was that maybe we should concentrate our efforts in unlocking the bootloader so even greater support can come.
Unfortunately we, the rest of us common mortals (with locked bootloaders) cannot use it.
As you said, this would work if somebody would release the bootloader-unlock , so lets play the waiting game...

The thing is I'm a common mortal like you :/ Like its said on first post, unfortunately, I do not have the tools nor the knowledge to reproduce the unlock, so I share what I can.

I really have to say sorry, if you dont know how to reproduce the hack... Mea culpa. It sounded like the hack is known, but cant be made public because of copyright issues or something like that... Then we have to wait. Nothing is secure when the right person gets a hdx... I have to say, that my actual hdx was rooted with towelroot, even easier than the nexus (less button combinations ) so i didnt expect amazon to be such a **** with newer firmwares.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Free mobile app

Cpasjuste said:
The thing is I'm a common mortal like you :/ Like its said on first post, unfortunately, I do not have the tools nor the knowledge to reproduce the unlock, so I share what I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for nagging you about it, but — genuinely asking — how did you do it on your device in the first place?

dear Cpasjuste, thanks for your great work, and how to install this Rom ? I am newbie, so..

OK... So you are a newbie in reading too?
Sent from my Nexus HDX 7 using XDA Free mobile app

I may eventually move to another tablet as I'm loosing interest in this device (because cm is working fine [emoji14]). Would someone be interested to get my device (not for free )?