why CPU on my ace shown 8 when i test quadrant using quadrant standard edition? the other ace have 12 CPU...
Related
So a few news sites are showing off the Quadrant score of the Nexus S running CM7: http://www.talkandroid.com/27099-nexus-s-scores-high-on-quadrant-benchmarks-running-cyanogenmod-7/
One thing I noticed is that the CPU Score is 5372. When I run Quadrant Advanced on my i9000 the CPU Score is only 1371. What has changed in CM7 that gives the Hummingbird processor so much more computational power and how do we get it on the SGS?
Think those guys just know what they are doing when it comes to Android unlike Samsung :/ lol
I'd be interested to see how the stock Nexus S firmware does in the same benchmark. I don't care about the overall Quadrant score, just the cpu part. I wish we could have CM on SGS
Hi N7 fellow users
i get MAX 2600 3D and 350 2D in antutu and quadrant though i'm all the time OC the GPU to 520mhz
is that normal ?? i'm running the latest Paranoid Android rom along the latest Franco kernel.
That is about what I get for 3D. If you go to the developer menu you can improve your 2D performance by checking the "Force GPU rendering" . For what it's worth my 2D for Quadrant went to about 1000 after the checking that option.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Thanks for your reply
My htc one X was getting 39xx, 1k higher than my nexus
though they use nearly the same gpu.
Homurato said:
Thanks for your reply.
My htc one X was getting 39xx, 1k higher than my nexus
though they use nearly the same gpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant does not measure gpu, it measures fps. and we are limited to 59fps no matter how much we overclock the gpu. use a benchmark like windmill, or basemark taiji, to test your gpu and what tweaking your gpu does. quadrant is an old, out of date benchmark.
simms22 said:
quadrant does not measure gpu, it measures fps. and we are limited to 59fps no matter how much we overclock the gpu. use a benchmark like windmill, or basemark taiji, to test your gpu and what tweaking your gpu does. quadrant is an old, out of date benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i guess i have to forget about all this paranoia coming from the low benchmark scores since every game works xD
(except horn strangely runs about 25 fps it seems, even though i'm oced to 520mhz)
Low of diminishing returns, if you over clock it doesn't mean ull always get higher scores, after ur GPU gets heated up it start to show lower and lower scores.
GPU is stable @ 446 (beyond that when ever it gets heated up it will cause touch and other issues)
Source: Read kernel Developers OP once a while
My question is simply, on AnTuTu Benchmark v 3.1.1 scores I find results for i9000 over than 17000 and CPU frequency more than 1600, is that possible and how?? For example, my ever best score is 5504 with ROM Xylon 2.1 and Semaphore kernel 2.9.10s, ondemand, ROW on CPU 1200...
I believe it's fake. Your score is pretty good as my max was ~5300 yet. The biggest score I've seen was by ts1506, who got more than 6000. But I think that is the edge of SGS capabilities
i got a score of 5360 with the same config...
score antutu of me too low, only 6500.This is how will grow score to 8500? i'm used jonrom and philz kernel.
Take off your antutu... the score is inaccurate and means nothing
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy SIV using Tapatalk 3
Hi everyone
I recently overclocked my Samsung galaxy S i9000 to 1.4 GHz. I'm using CM 10.1.2 as my ROM and Mackay kernel 3.0.86.
I overvolted my cpu to 1350 mV and oc'd to 1.4 GHz using Voltage control app.
My issue (please see the attached png image file) --- Low 3D graphics score in AnTuTu benchmark even after this much oc'ing
I assume that as you overclock the cpu the gpu clock also gets increased, thereby increasing my 3d graphics score
Appreciate any assistance
thats normal mate, increasing cpu doesnt mean increasing in gpu or 2/3D perf. unless u can change da graphic card
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium