Database Develop

[kernel][27/01/2012][ICS kernel based Paolo Kernel 2.6.35.14]

Hi Guys,
First of all I am not a real DEV. I see things, read things and learn from it. That's all.
I have patched Palao's kernel for my use on ICS ROM. Some guys can use it so thought to share with you.
I have not created this Kernel from scratch so haven't changed it's name. Giving full respect to it's DEV.
Change LOG:
Binod_Kernel_Paol_Sys_V1.zip
HTML:
Fixed WI-FI
Fixed Random Reboot
Few scripts for ROM stability
Downlaod: http://www.mediafire.com/?5p4790z44l36qg2
Report if you guys find some bugs. I'll try to resolve it.

Reserved
I think I can utilise it..

its for Cyanogenmod 9 (Android 4.0.3)[ALPHA3] by lupohirp?

sweetbinodray,
can you tell exactly what you used

hafidzduddin said:
its for Cyanogenmod 9 (Android 4.0.3)[ALPHA3] by lupohirp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes....it's for LUPOHIRP ROM

Next job:
Import kgsl drivers and power manager from 3.0 kernel...
Quite good... keep it up...

What about cm7 nightlies?
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk

dnle71 said:
What about cm7 nightlies?
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try flashing this... since not much has been changed...

_Arjen_ said:
sweetbinodray,
can you tell exactly what you used
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much. Just changed the whole kernel folder. Only sys is from PAO.

What kernel source you use to build?
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App

thachtunganh said:
What kernel source you use to build?
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
official CM7 kernel

Why use this instead of Franco's 2.35.14? Pros & cons?
Sent from my LG-P500 using Much Love

you rocks dude
but I think, franco kernel is better CMIIW

can you patch the battery improvement patches from fserve?

Whats the ICS thing about this kernel? Right.
Same question at that file explorer "ICS".
Right.
Stability fixes?
Right.
Franco is always better.
Greets!

You cant actually call this ICS Kernel...
The one which lupohirp will release with his next ICS Beta will be considered as an ICS Kernel due to backporting of many drivers to make ICS more stable...

RockR172 said:
You cant actually call this ICS Kernel...
The one which lupohirp will release with his next ICS Beta will be considered as an ICS Kernel due to backporting of many drivers to make ICS more stable...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I said. Bino can't port them, so this is just a BinoKernel
Wait, I'll make a script wich reboots the phone and call it "The ICS script by mDroidd"!
Vir Prudens non contra ventum mingit

RockR172 said:
You cant actually call this ICS Kernel...
The one which lupohirp will release with his next ICS Beta will be considered as an ICS Kernel due to backporting of many drivers to make ICS more stable...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The backport of Kgsl driver will be hard. I don't think that we just clone the free xperia kernel source then get the patch and patch our kernel source... we still need to modify, beside , the power manager is broken...

Guys you are going high. I haven't said that this is my kernel. I even haven't changed it's name. So just stop pissing someone. I patched it for my use. It's working great for me.For the ICS name, It's for ICS ROM that's why ICS kernel.
If you want go ahead and download if not then don't. keep everything very simple.

mDroidd said:
Wait, I'll make a script wich reboots the phone and call it "The ICS script by mDroidd"!
Vir Prudens non contra ventum mingit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stop overacting kid! You seem to be getting dax's habits..stop spamming!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk

What next after CM7 ?

I am on CM7 build #72, I know it's too old. Now I want to update it. So to which one I should go ? Latest CM7 ? Or CM 7.2 ?
I need most stable one.
Thank you

Depends on how you define "stable".
Stable by any mean should be the CM7.1.
Anything else is "pretty stable" based on my definition.

Upgrade to a Mirage CM7.2 kang. It's rock solid.
Sent from space

koopakid08 said:
Upgrade to a Mirage CM7.2 kang. It's rock solid.
Sent from space
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep I second koopakid, Mirage is the most up to date and stableist build out there xD
here's the link to the rom's post Mirage FTW

Thanks for replying guys
I will go with 7.2 can anyone tell me how do I uninstall current CM7 #72 and install 7.2 ? And also which Kernel I can use ? And over clocked proc build ?
Thank you

avi! said:
Thanks for replying guys
I will go with 7.2 can anyone tell me how do I uninstall current CM7 #72 and install 7.2 ? And also which Kernel I can use ? And over clocked proc build ?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just install mirage like you first installed CM7 if you need instructions check out the guide in my sig, just use the mirage zip instead of the one provided in the guide. Overclock kernel is already included in CM7.1 and 7.2 so you are good to go there.
Sent from my Blackberry Playbook

^Thanks for replying.
Earlier I used to install by flashing the memory card, boot it & install.
Since you have mentioned kernel's are not needed, I just downloaded :
- ROM with only English(US) and Spanish languages - 03042012 build: MD5sum: 2d747ca70df8634ab14710e75b48f882
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I boot into recovery with ROM Manager & flash the zip file ?
Thanks in advance

Yup. Delete dalvik cache, load the ROM and reboot. You might want to run the V6 script if you haven't yet.

Have no idea about V6 script, will search & find more about it. Thank you for replying mate

@koopakid08, jgaf, MISRy - Guys thank you very much ! updated to Mirage
however I don't see any new differences from earlier build

Assuming you are on the 03042012 ROM, the most obvious difference is the softkeys, home, menu, back, are ICS style now. Have you cranked up your clock? Lowered your voltage? Taken advantage of any of the benefits you now have?
Sent from the Center of My Mind

koopakid08 said:
Upgrade to a Mirage CM7.2 kang. It's rock solid.
Sent from space
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Mirage is solid.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA

i'm new with all this...

i want to do a root & CWM for my SGM
also i want to install CM9
but i really don't know how...
and need all this things for this week...
can you help me please? (step by step)

read.. read.. and read.. all of these things can be found here..

YehiamBenShushan said:
i want to do a root & CWM for my SGM
also i want to install CM9
but i really don't know how...
and need all this things for this week...
can you help me please? (step by step)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go to this thread and read the guide section there are also links for video tutorials if possible read the full thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1443907

can you give me (please) link for the most updated CWM ?

YehiamBenShushan said:
can you give me (please) link for the most updated CWM ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here u go...cwm touch recovery,read the instructions on the post...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1529863
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium

elixdragon said:
Here u go...cwm touch recovery,read the instructions on the post...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1529863
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if i have SGM i need to download.. "cwm-touch-5.0.2.8-mini.tar.md5"
or the standard one ?
BTW..
you have skype ?
can you help me on skype ?

YehiamBenShushan said:
if i have SGM i need to download.. "cwm-touch-5.0.2.8-mini.tar.md5"
or the standard one ?
BTW..
you have skype ?
can you help me on skype ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea...go for the latest one n yea i hv skype
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium

First you need to install CWM Recovery from here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1529863
Second you need to download CM9 from here:
http://galaxyics.com (Click DOWNLOAD, scroll down and click on Select below the Mini picture, then click on Releases, then click Download)
Then flash it through CWM.

You might know this already, but if you really want to install CM9 in a SGM, you need to have in mind that CM9 in SMG is not stable (yet). For example, if you want to install the CM9 of Squadzone, you should really read these two links:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20495725&postcount=225
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20703957&postcount=286
Of course, there are other versions of CM9 for Samsung Galaxy mini in the Dev. Forums, but I didn't try them.
About the CWM, I use the v4, because at the first time when I wanted to install CyanogenMod, the CWM v5 didn't install the ROM correctly (never passed from the bootscreen "android"). And the Backup/restore in CWM v5 didn't work it (at least in my Galaxy Mini). But the Restore function worked perfectly in CWM v4 and, until now, I hadn't problems installing other ROMs in my SGM.
I really recommend (for now) use CM7 RC 5.6 or (RC 5.3 - the one that I'm using it now). If you want CM9 only for the ICS Appearance, you can install a ICS theme with "Theme Chooser" from CM. There's also an ICS Launcher that works good.
Just Saying~

you need to have in mind that CM9 in SMG is not stable (yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From that link in my previous post I installed CM9 on my SGM and it is very usable to me.
I'm not using it constantly because it lacks some features that I found, and I'm used to, on squad's CM7, for example. But it's very good.

felipevsw said:
From that link in my previous post I installed CM9 on my SGM and it is very usable to me.
I'm not using it constantly because it lacks some features that I found, and I'm used to, on squad's CM7, for example. But it's very good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice! which CPU governor did you use and with what Min and Max frequency? How did you do with the laggy visual effect? right now, would you prefer CM9 more than CM7 from squad's? I'm asking all these questions because I want to have CM9 in my SGM but somehow, the first and second time I installed that CM9 I went back to my CM7.2 RC 5.3 backup xD

Harp_River said:
Nice! which CPU governor did you use and with what Min and Max frequency? How did you do with the laggy visual effect? right now, would you prefer CM9 more than CM7 from squad's? I'm asking all these questions because I want to have CM9 in my SGM but somehow, the first and second time I installed that CM9 I went back to my CM7.2 RC 5.3 backup xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always use as Governor lilgV2 (or SmartassV2 when present) and I/O noop. On that ROM the laggy visual effect is hardly noticed, try it!
As I said before: I'm not using CM9 (yet) because it lacks some features that squad's CM7 has. But if you are not used to them, you will not note any difference.
You should try it and see for yourself.

Regarding CM9 Beta4, just read the thread in this section and the entire thread in the dev section before you fiddle with it and decide if it's worth it for you.
There's a lot of fiddling and some things are somewhat working while others, like camera, are just not working at all.
IMO, it's not for daily use and won't be for a long time but if you have a spare mini, give it a try and help with the development and bug reporting.

felipevsw said:
I always use as Governor lilgV2 (or SmartassV2 when present) and I/O noop. On that ROM the laggy visual effect is hardly noticed, try it!
As I said before: I'm not using CM9 (yet) because it lacks some features that squad's CM7 has. But if you are not used to them, you will not note any difference.
You should try it and see for yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha maybe that's the reason. I'm also used to the features of squad's CM7. But I will try it again and see the results with your advices
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA

Jinxxed said:
Regarding CM9 Beta4, just read the thread in this section and the entire thread in the dev section before you fiddle with it and decide if it's worth it for you.
There's a lot of fiddling and some things are somewhat working while others, like camera, are just not working at all.
IMO, it's not for daily use and won't be for a long time but if you have a spare mini, give it a try and help with the development and bug reporting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's very right! I forgot to mention because I rarely use my phones' camera... But fot phone-like uses like SMS and calls it's ok. And smartphone uses like browse web, facebook app, gmail, maps, it's fine too.

Follow as per the steps given
The instructions are very clear to understand. You will not have any problem, if you follow all the instructions.

[MOD] Mackay Kernel 3.2 Modded for CM10 with GPS Fix

First of all, many thanks to Kasper_h for all your work.
This is a mod of Mackay's Kernel 3.0, designed to work with the offical CM10 stable. I've seen various posts about CM not working, so I put this mod togther to get a fully working CM10 based ROM based on the offical CM10 stable.
The advantages of CM10 over CM10.1
Video recording works
Skype Video Calling works
Barcode Scanning apps work
Burst mode camera apps work
Apps2SD works
Bluetooth File transfer (send/receive) works
GPS works
The disadvantages of CM10 over CM10.1
Code base is obsolete, so no more fixes/updates/features etc
Feels slightly less fluid/responsive than Mackays Rom
Feels slightly less stable than Mackays Rom
This has the standard CM10 ramdisk, modified to include Kasper_h's GPS Fix, along with Mackay's Kernel 3.0 zimage (unmodified).
See Kasper_H's original thread here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2153164
Kasper_h's kernel source here: https://github.com/kasperhettinga/lge-kernel-sniper
Get the CM10 stable from here: http://get.cm/?device=p970
Get the Google apps for 4.1.x from here: http://goo.im/gapps
How to Install
1. Reboot to recovery
2. Wipe data/factory reset
3. Install CM10 stable
4. Install Gapps for 4.1.x
5. Install P970-MackayKernel-3.0-Mod-for-CM10-GPS-Fix (attached to this post)
6. Reboot
Issues
1. In about phone, kernel version is shown as unavailable, but shows correctly in CPUSpy
2. If you enable Kernel Same Page Merging (in settings/Performance/Memory) it will cause occasional reboots/screen locks.
3. Very occasional vibration lock, lasting 30-40 seconds, so just wait if that happens. To avoid, disable Vibrate on Touch in settings/sound
4. Video recording with the CM10 camera crashes (still photo and gallery is fine), download Ucam Ultra https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ucamera.ucam&hl=en for issue free video recording
Enjoy
Edit: Updated Mackay Kernel to 3.1
Edited 26/8/13: Updated Mackay Kernel to 3.2
Edited 28/10/13: Uploaded Mackey Kernel 1.9, which seems to fix the random rebooting bug, vibration bug and fixes a couple of games that didn't work on the 3.2 Kernel

It's not working on CM10.1? Could be fixed in that case?
Thanks for your work.

Mexickano said:
It's not working on CM10.1? Could be fixed in that case?
Thanks for your work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use Mackay ROM, it has this kernel included, or get the kernel from Mackay's thread. It will work with CM10.1.
The kernel in this thread has been modified for CM10.

Kernel 3.1 came out with fixes on vsync.Saves battery and improving performance
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 4

TMinh said:
Use Mackay ROM, it has this kernel included, or get the kernel from Mackay's thread. It will work with CM10.1.
The kernel in this thread has been modified for CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel from Mackay's ROM have this
The advantages of CM10 over CM10.1
Video recording works
Skype Video Calling works
Barcode Scanning apps work
Burst mode camera apps work
Apps2SD works
Bluetooth File transfer (send/receive) works
GPS works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anyway thanks for make it more clear.

Question : cpu governor & i/o schedule in ur kasper_h's kernel mod have same original mackay kernel 3.0.8x ??
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2

jobzsparrow said:
Question : cpu governor & i/o schedule in ur kasper_h's kernel mod have same original mackay kernel 3.0.8x ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, its the same kernel, its the ramdisk that's diferent in this mod.

using with Kernel same page still not found problem (2.)
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2

@jason600 can you update the kernel to the latest one ( v3.1 ) ? Thanks :highfive:

DaemonOnx said:
@jason600 can you update the kernel to the latest one ( v3.1 ) ? Thanks :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currenty testing 3.1 at the moment, as long as I don't find any serious issues, I'll upload it tomorrow.
Edit: Updated to Mackay Kernel 3.1, see attachment in first post.

yo!! good work , i'm installing
ps. this mod have got grant from kasper_h ?
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2

jobzsparrow said:
yo!! good work , i'm installing
ps. this mod have got grant from kasper_h ?
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean did I ask kasper_h for permission before doing this mod? Then the answer is no. Kasper_h has stated in the mackay thread he would not do a CM10 version, because of this I considered it would be ok provided it was fully credited to him, which I have done.
If kasper_h is unhappy with this mod for any reason, I'll take it down at once.

jason600 said:
Do you mean did I ask kasper_h for permission before doing this mod? Then the answer is no. Kasper_h has stated in the mackay thread he would not do a CM10 version, because of this I considered it would be ok provided it was fully credited to him, which I have done.
If kasper_h is unhappy with this mod for any reason, I'll take it down at once.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me answer this one myself, easiest I guess
As I have said in my own thread, I am perfectly happy with people using my work. That is what opensource is about: people improving each-others work And as said in the quoted post, I also said that I will not work on a CM10 version of the kernel, but that I am happy to support others who want to port the kernel to CM10.

kasper_h said:
Let me answer this one myself, easiest I guess
As I have said in my own thread, I am perfectly happy with people using my work. That is what opensource is about: people improving each-others work And as said in the quoted post, I also said that I will not work on a CM10 version of the kernel, but that I am happy to support others who want to port the kernel to CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that kasper, and my apologies for not asking beforehand, which with hindsight, I should of done.

both pretty Developers :thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2

kasper_h said:
Let me answer this one myself, easiest I guess
As I have said in my own thread, I am perfectly happy with people using my work. That is what opensource is about: people improving each-others work And as said in the quoted post, I also said that I will not work on a CM10 version of the kernel, but that I am happy to support others who want to port the kernel to CM10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kasper Hettinga(Apologies if spelt incorrectly)You are a good man,You should have applied for Recognized Developer if not Contributer.You totally deserve it for the magical works you have done.If I could I would have bought you a sack of coffee beanz.Good man.
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 4
---------- Post added at 11:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:03 PM ----------
Please fix the KSM bug as I want/need to use that feature ,thanks
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 4

BlackPie said:
Kasper Hettinga(Apologies if spelt incorrectly)You are a good man,You should have applied for Recognized Developer if not Contributer.You totally deserve it for the magical works you have done.If I could I would have bought you a sack of coffee beanz.Good man.
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you look closely you see that it says "Recognised Developer" under his name :silly:

RomWiz said:
If you look closely you see that it says "Recognised Developer" under his name :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh.I must have missed that
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 4

BlackPie said:
Please fix the KSM bug as I want/need to use that feature ,thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Firstly, KSM works, but the bug might cause occasional reboots (maybe once per day)
Secondly, although Kernel Samepage Merging helps reduce ram usage, the effect is not that dramatic.
If you having memory problems, try the following:
1. Disable JIT. No noticable performance drop and each running process uses a few less mb's of ram. With lots of running apps, this adds up. To disable JIT, add the following line to your build.prop:
Code:
dalvik.vm.execution-mode=int:fast
2. Install Greenify https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.oasisfeng.greenify&hl=en and hibernate apps that run in the background.
3. Install a 200mb swap file on the system partition (much faster than the sd card). You'll be able to load virtally any game/large app. Download Turbo Boost http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2145133 and extract it on your pc. For a 200mb swap on system copy the file from TURBO BOOST MOD v3.02-AROMA\swap\system\200\etc\init.d\98swap_system_v300 and put it in /etc/init.d on your phone, then reboot. The swap file is created automatically.
4. Install V6 Supercharger http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276

Version 3.1 doesn't boot for me, while 3.0 does just fine.

[ROM][Port][Alpha 1] ParanoidAndroid

Hey all this threads made for developer who want to help me fix the bugs in this rom
Note: this builds only for expert only thats know how to logcat and fix the bugs when appears using this rom
Disclaimer:i will not take any responsibility for bricking your device this rom totaly ported to our ace soo do with ur own risk
You should be on my CM7 Specific basic kernel and on a CM7 RC4 Based ROM!!
Wipe everything - data, cahce and dalvik
Mount system
Install zip from sdcard - ROM
special thanks to:
bieltv3 for cm9 Alpha 1
NickHalden for panoroid rom
just a test if it works i will then update it to beta 1
download link
http://www.4shared.com/zip/Jgg-Hr5E/paranoid.html?

I can test for you later. Is it booting?
Enviado do Brasil
EDIT: I voted for not closing the thread. Why? Because when Cm7 was still on beta, ivchek said this, and i agree: these rom are good, so they deserve the paralel development.

hey
mathm2013 said:
I can test for you later. Is it booting?
Enviado do Brasil
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I dont have the device I ported this to Ace i cause i couldnt find this rom in the thread. So i need testers to test this

problem
sarmadulhaq said:
Actually I dont have the device I ported this to Ace i cause i couldnt find this rom in the thread. So i need testers to test this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
installation aborted !!

R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again

sarmadulhaq said:
R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried it twice same problem wait for any other users reply

sarmadulhaq said:
R u sure, try once more and if it doesn't work then i will port it again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not putting you down or anything, but there isn't really a need to port it. Nobody will use the Rom for now.
Sent from my Cosmic Ace-i

Actually, I would use the rom if it was based on beta 1, since the wifi works... At least he is trying to get some new things for ace i.
I was just about to port this But good job!

yeah, you need to port it again but this time using new CM build. Anyway: is there a sense to port ICS (cm9) based roms if there is no stable build for cooperve? Personally i think we should wait for RC version like CM7.2 by biel.

drumiec said:
yeah, you need to port it again but this time using new CM build. Anyway: is there a sense to port ICS (cm9) based roms if there is no stable build for cooperve? Personally i think we should wait for RC version like CM7.2 by biel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 i think we should wait for a rc release from biel. becuz i think noone wont use this rom. sorry. but anyway u r trying to give us something good.
Galaxy Pop Plus'ımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi.

Installation aborted...but Keep up the good work...
Love to see PA on our ace-i and ya!! as the other members suggested, better wait for RC release...

I think closing the thread waiting for a release candidate is not the thing to do. There's people that will use the ROM even with all the bugs and the lag, if it's present.

Please continue the rom it will take time but good things will happen here. I love pa and wish you the best in your work. Thank you bro.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

Just why do you want to port it instead of building it?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app

GT-af said:
Just why do you want to port it instead of building it?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)

Why so much hurry in making cm9 based roms..Let atleast stable version come..
My suggestion..Not discouraging you..But according to me wait for stable cm9..
Atleast Hit Thanx If I helped U-XDA Rule
Bootanimations for MDPI Devices
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2126329

Howdareme said:
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be as cm9, without difference of driver,if cm9 has driver PA Will also, porting create many little bugs, and paranoid is made to be built i think
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app

Howdareme said:
A difference between porting and building, and if he did build it, it will never have hw and will be slow (due to the lack of GPU drivers)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thing you said is absurd. Porting will create more bugs. And a port takes libs from base rom, so porting and building makes no difference at this point, but porting might create bugs as it was built for another device.
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda app-developers app