[Q] DROID 3 really supports DualCore? - Motorola Droid 3

Hello everybody!
I want to buy a Milestone 3 (actual DROID 3 outside U.S), but this smartphone have a DualCore. My doubt is: Gingerbread's Milestone 3 will use a full power of OMAP DualCore 1ghz? Or not, the Milestone 3 will use only one core? Because Gingerbread not support multicore (only 3.0+), right?
Thanks!

What? It has dualcore and it supports it. Whether it's used properly by android is another question....

DoubleYouPee said:
What? It has dualcore and it supports it. Whether it's used properly by android is another question....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What? Droid 3 has android ???

DoubleYouPee said:
What? It has dualcore and it supports it. Whether it's used properly by android is another question....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know that android accepted dualcore a long time ago. But just like to know if I'll take advantage of dual core with Gingerbread, or if there some optimization of the system for the OMAP DualCore of DROID3.

Yes, it can use both cores
Rocking with my M3 and XDA app

AragornPE said:
Yes, it can use both cores
Rocking with my M3 and XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But only source of Honeycomb and Ice Cream Sandwich have a Multicore support, right?
The Android Page said this: Honeycomb is a first platform Android optmized for Multicore proc.
http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-3.0-highlights.html#multicore
I very confused about it. So, Gingerbread's Milestone 3/DROID3 work with multicore too? How?
PS.: AragornPE is a brazilian user, so i'll translate the my post above to portuguese, because i'm a brazilian user too:
Mas apenas o source do Honeycomb e o Ice Cream Sandwich tem o suporte ao Multicore, certo?
Na página do Android diz o seguinte: Honeycomb é a primeira plataforma Android otimizada para processadores Multicore.
http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-3.0-highlights.html#multicore
Eu estou muito confuso sobre isso. Então, o Gingerbread do Milestone 3/DROID3 trabalha com o multicore também?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

I guess it's just better with ICS

TyoLoki said:
But only source of Honeycomb and Ice Cream Sandwich have a Multicore support, right?
The Android Page said this: Honeycomb is a first platform Android optmized for Multicore proc.
http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-3.0-highlights.html#multicore
I very confused about it. So, Gingerbread's Milestone 3/DROID3 work with multicore too? How?
PS.: AragornPE is a brazilian user, so i'll translate the my post above to portuguese, because i'm a brazilian user too:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it probably got support at kernel side after HC got it shoudnt be to dificult to port if you own the source code

I'm pretty sure GB supports multicore processors, just doesn't utilize them as well as ICS does.

TyoLoki said:
But only source of Honeycomb and Ice Cream Sandwich have a Multicore support, right?
The Android Page said this: Honeycomb is a first platform Android optmized for Multicore proc.
http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-3.0-highlights.html#multicore
I very confused about it. So, Gingerbread's Milestone 3/DROID3 work with multicore too? How?
PS.: AragornPE is a brazilian user, so i'll translate the my post above to portuguese, because i'm a brazilian user too:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm no dev, but I can "feel" the difference between Droid 2 and 3 (I have both). Droid 3 is snappier than Droid 2, and the main difference between both is the dual core processor. Droid 3 should be slower, since it has a bigger resolution, but it's not. So I assume it's using both cores
Thanks for the translation! But I understand english pretty well, so this is not needed =]

Related

ics hw acceleration - ICS Tegra2 drivers are here

Anyone knows when nvidia plans to release drivers so we can have hw acceleration working in ICS.
EDIT: There are binary drivers for Tegra2 and ICS in Acer A200 tablet.
http://www.acertabletforum.com/foru...4-0-3-ultrabase-rooted-busybox-installed.html
No one knows and as the scene looks like, they never will release it...
We have many hardworking devz out there, I'm sure before Nvidia releases the code or even think to, we would have got jellybean too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
nexus2515 said:
No one knows and as the scene looks like, they never will release it...
We have many hardworking devz out there, I'm sure before Nvidia releases the code or even think to, we would have got jellybean too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and what good would jelly bee without drivers for our device?
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
nexus2515 said:
No one knows and as the scene looks like, they never will release it...
We have many hardworking devz out there, I'm sure before Nvidia releases the code or even think to, we would have got jellybean too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd understand that they're not releasing the drivers because they rule the scene, but open source guys are running circles around them.
Qualcomm just released drivers for the adreno 2xx series So there is some hope from manufacturers
grognaz said:
and what good would jelly bee without drivers for our device?
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant to say tht our hard wrking devs can find some way and get us jellybean android too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Galaid said:
I'd understand that they're not releasing the drivers because they rule the scene, but open source guys are running circles around them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think they are doing these coz they Don't want other manufacturers to copy thier drivers or something like that
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Scougar said:
Qualcomm just released drivers for the adreno 2xx series So there is some hope from manufacturers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qualcomm never hid anything from develpors( at least i never heard about it)
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
nexus2515 said:
I meant to say tht our hard wrking devs can find some way and get us jellybean android too
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, with all the work that ICS is giving just to release it for O2X i seriously doubt that we will ever get Jelly bean...
Sesto_Sento said:
LOL, with all the work that ICS is giving just to release it for O2X i seriously doubt that we will ever get Jelly bean...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have patiece bro
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
Nevr forget the thanX button
Guys, ACER Iconia A200 has Tegra2 and ICS, why we cannot reuse those binary drivers for our Tegra2?
THE ROM IS here: http://www.acertabletforum.com/forum/acer-a200-roms/3974-rom-ics-4-0-3-ultrabase-rooted-busybox-installed.html
Atrix 4G also has Tegra2, ICS is comming soon..
http://www.motorola.com/blog/2012/02/15/update-motorola-ice-cream-sandwich-news/?pubid=987654
I believe Samsung Galaxy R (SGS2 with Tegra2) as well..
But A200 is here, I believe something can be cooked
First of all i'm not 100% sure about i'm about to say, but:
NVidia will probably never publish source codes of their drivers. They never did and they never will. Only phone manufacturer (LG in this case) can ask NVidia to make for them a specific kernel (or HAL?) with all required drivers. As far as i know LG is planning to do it becouse they want to give us official ICS "soon".
And about taking drivers from other devices...
It's quite complicated. In simple words hw video drivers are connected to specific kernel and somehow with other drivers (f.e sound, radio) which are diffrent then in f.e galaxy R. Samewhere on Ricardo Cerqueira's Google+ page was a discussion where someone explained how does it work and why it doesn't, but i can't find it atm.
Sorry about my english
RoXeon said:
First of all i'm not 100% sure about i'm about to say, but:
NVidia will probably never publish source codes of their drivers. They never did and they never will. Only phone manufacturer (LG in this case) can ask NVidia to make for them a specific kernel (or HAL?) with all required drivers. As far as i know LG is planning to do it becouse they want to give us official ICS "soon".
And about taking drivers from other devices...
It's quite complicated. In simple words hw video drivers are connected to specific kernel and somehow with other drivers (f.e sound, radio) which are diffrent then in f.e galaxy R. Samewhere on Ricardo Cerqueira's Google+ page was a discussion where someone explained how does it work and why it doesn't, but i can't find it atm.
Sorry about my english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We don't need the source, just the binaries. Driver shouldn't depend on the kernel, afaik.
Galaid said:
We don't need the source, just the binaries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said we do
Galaid said:
Driver shouldn't depend on the kernel, afaik.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HAL has to match kernel. Thats why we can't use GB divers and thats why we can't use drivers from other devices with same video hw.
RoXeon said:
I never said we do
HAL has to match kernel. Thats why we can't use GB divers and thats why we can't use drivers from other devices with same video hw.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What would be the purpose of Qualcomm releasing user-mode driver binaries for Adreno 2xx GPU on Google Android Ice Cream Sandwich if it wasn't possible to integrate them with AOSP for any Adreno 2xx GPU?
Galaid said:
What would be the purpose of Qualcomm releasing user-mode driver binaries for Adreno 2xx GPU on Google Android Ice Cream Sandwich if it wasn't possible to integrate them with AOSP for any Adreno 2xx GPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, i have no clue how it works, but still - HAL uses libs that are in kernel (HAL is dynamically linked with them). If other kernel version has diffrent structs, HAL simply won't work with that kernel. I thought that diffrent devices have a bit diffrent hw related libs (maybe some phones like O2X do?) in kernel which is messing up with HAL.
Taking into account Your post, at this point i have no idea why HAL is or is not related to specific device.

OMAP 3630 Kernel 3 source code

I found this link, may be someone can compile for ICS? ??
http://e2e.ti.com/support/omap/f/849/t/166461.aspx
http://e2e.ti.com/support/omap/f/849/t/166461.aspx
http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/p-android-omap3-3.0
I hope cm9 for our device release soon
Nice
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
I'm trying to make the kernel 3.0
Those sites and its contenet are well known here in xda ob development section. Btw until Ti will not release the improvments for the multimedia functionality there wont be a stable and daily use ics for our ob! we need to wait cm9 or lg itself in september to update officially to ics.
capocorp said:
Those sites and its contenet are well known here in xda ob development section. Btw until Ti will not release the improvments for the multimedia functionality there wont be a stable and daily use ics for our ob! we need to wait cm9 or lg itself in september to update officially to ics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true these sources are old but thanks for sharing any way.
Hi guys,
any news about kernel 3?
Did TI forget about OMAP3?
Thanks.
does this help
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1711061
making a kernel 3.0
its from the samsung galaxy s SL
same procesor
androidjel said:
does this help
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1711061
making a kernel 3.0
its from the samsung galaxy s SL
same procesor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have talked to him by PM.
Because it has the same AP I thought that it could help all devices that are OMAP3630 based, but apparently different devices need all the work that he made done again.

ICS Drivers for Tegra 2...

Hi All,
i am not a developer and found this link which is having kernel 3.X.X.X drivers, so i thought they may be ICS drivers for Tegra 2 Ventana board, so can some one who is have knowledge on the Kernel please validate these drivers...
By using these drivers can we have H/W acceleration with ICS/JB...
Link:http://www.nvidia.com/content/devzone/linux-for-tegra.html
Cool thread : D
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
i dont know about that, but our board isnt a ventana board, it is a lg star board. ventana is a model of tegra 2
skylinegt77 said:
i dont know about that, but our board isnt a ventana board, it is a lg star board. ventana is a model of tegra 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.
Hi, unfortunately are the drivers for linux
tatperson said:
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you for your facepalm just before you confirm what i just said... loooool
tatperson said:
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, as far as I know, Android uses slightly modified Linux kernel. Starting from 3.X.X Linus T. started to include Android code into Linux. Anyway, conclusion is that provided code and binaries probably can be used to build fully-functional kernel for ICS, but it would be quite hard task and need a lot of effort. If LG will provide theirs plan to don't upgrade O2X, it looks reasonable to start such project, until that happened it can be waste of time.
skylinegt77 said:
thank you for your facepalm just before you confirm what i just said... loooool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome!
Sent from that Atrix.
frantic777 said:
Well, as far as I know, Android uses slightly modified Linux kernel. Starting from 3.X.X Linus T. started to include Android code into Linux. Anyway, conclusion is that provided code and binaries probably can be used to build fully-functional kernel for ICS, but it would be quite hard task and need a lot of effort. If LG will provide theirs plan to don't upgrade O2X, it looks reasonable to start such project, until that happened it can be waste of time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So do you think it will be very hard for kernel developers to include these drives in the 3.X.X kernel ...
mj.vikram said:
So do you think it will be very hard for kernel developers to include these drives in the 3.X.X kernel ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously, it may need to develop kind of adapters between provided drivers and interfaces required by ICS. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of details regarding interaction between android (dalvik) and kernel, but according to my understanding it is possible.

[DEV's][BROADCOM] OPEN DIALOGUE WITH BROADCOM - MADTeam Forum

http://madteam.co/forum/general-77/(dev's)(broadcom)-open-dialogue-with-broadcom/
possible source for the gpu in the near future?
Possible cm7 in future
Open source will be never released,maybe new drivers
Well since broadcom is looking into the rom of the Y or Ace (not sure which one, because the topic was about ace, but was posted in Y Section) It is probably going to have full CPU and GPU Drivers
Qnrx said:
Well since broadcom is looking into the rom of the Y or Ace (not sure which one, because the topic was about ace, but was posted in Y Section) It is probably going to have full CPU and GPU Drivers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well let's hope so, so we can get CM7.2 on this baby? Also the broadcom guy just posted a new reply to that topic.
Any developers from here care to go over and offer what info they can to help speed this along or whatnot? He asks about the "Y" in his latest reply, if the sources are released will the devs be able to use them for CM7.2 for our S5380i?
Hi paradoxiumwind
you have to read a little more of Galaxy Ace "S5830" S5830 Young Galaxy and have the same CPU, same GPU, videocam IV .. totally the same drivers, the only thing that has more Galaxy Ace S5830 is a flash and other veicina screen 320 x 480 pixels, 3.5 inches ... I use Ace S5830 And talking with Broadcom to release some of the drivers that are essential, Broadcom seeks solutions to dismiss some of the drier gpu, to Mogo to create CyanogenMod, AOKP, AOSP ... and I understand for a lot more applications ... A full drivers for the GPU will come out a little later...
My nick on this forum is: AmirChe
Harley--TSI said:
Hi paradoxiumwind
you have to read a little more of Galaxy Ace "S5830" S5830 Young Galaxy and have the same CPU, same GPU, videocam IV .. totally the same drivers, the only thing that has more Galaxy Ace S5830 is a flash and other veicina screen 320 x 480 pixels, 3.5 inches ... I use Ace S5830 And talking with Broadcom to release some of the drivers that are essential, Broadcom seeks solutions to dismiss some of the drier gpu, to Mogo to create CyanogenMod, AOKP, AOSP ... and I understand for a lot more applications ... A full drivers for the GPU will come out a little later...
My nick on this forum is: AmirChe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the explaination, so since they're basically the same hardware when they release the source for the "Y", we (I mean the devs) can use it for our i to get CM7.2?
paradoxiumwind said:
Thanks for the explaination, so since they're basically the same hardware when they release the source for the "Y", we (I mean the devs) can use it for our i to get CM7.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
Yes, I think they will only need to be replaced LCS Density from 120 to 160. or in the extreme case, to update and to add some more oddatak .. The whole system is done everything works great, but we can not be installing, means You can not get to the entrance, squardzone tested and missing his only got one driver ... look at the dialogue I think there you have everything else you need
will we able to see ICS or JB?
now a question... I know, is too soon, but, will we be able to see Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean in our loved devices? I'd like to help...
gabboman said:
now a question... I know, is too soon, but, will we be able to see Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean in our loved devices? I'd like to help...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, but they will run like ass? Our phones are not powerful. I will be happy with CM7.2
paradoxiumwind said:
Sure, but they will run like ass? Our phones are not powerful. I will be happy with CM7.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
domnic79 said:
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And on paper our Gpu is powerful..If it works well then cm7 should be the first step.
Sent from my GALAXY ACE on Ace cream v1.2
domnic79 said:
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
andy.acei said:
And on paper our Gpu is powerful..If it works well then cm7 should be the first step.
Sent from my GALAXY ACE on Ace cream v1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 & CM10 Work Perfectly on galaxy GIO too. And apart from a greater PPI value, galaxy gio is lesser in sepcs as compared to Ace-i. I also think (And Hope) CM9 & 10 should work like a charm on 5830i as well in the near future. :good:
saeed14i said:
CM9 & CM10 Work Perfectly on galaxy GIO too. And apart from a greater PPI value, galaxy gio is lesser in sepcs as compared to Ace-i. I also think (And Hope) CM9 & 10 should work like a charm on 5830i as well in the near future. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specs do not matter much to run CM9/10. But you need good specs to run it smoothly. Even HTC G1, the first android phone, has Jelly bean but it lags.
Availability of drivers for chipset matters the most.
system.img said:
Specs do not matter much to run CM9/10. But you need good specs to run it smoothly. Even HTC G1, the first android phone, has Jelly bean but it lags.
Availability of drivers for chipset matters the most.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You right mate, we should move like Galaxy Y users, but here is everybody ""waiting"" for a miracle, but if all of we don't do nothing the miracle will not happens...
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
paradoxiumwind said:
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is old news.
It just means that they wont officially support snapdragon s1.
paradoxiumwind said:
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means cyanogen wont provide a official CM9 for our device. But developers here can make a port or tweak it to run in our device once all sources regarding the CPU/GPU/kernel are available. :beer:
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2
schakusa said:
You right mate, we should move like Galaxy Y users, but here is everybody ""waiting"" for a miracle, but if all of we don't do nothing the miracle will not happens...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But i think if Galaxy Y can have the sources, we can get too, because we have the same hardware and bla bla bla.
InnerSanctum said:
But i think if Galaxy Y can have the sources, we can get too, because we have the same hardware and bla bla bla.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He think he meant that we should also support them as much as we can....so that broadcom really feels that there is an urgent need for the sources.
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2

Problem whith Chainfire 3d and Cyanogen Mod 10.1

Hi guys, i have a big problem installing The chainfire Driver on my Ace whith CM 10.1-RCO-cooper!
the first time i install the phone stuck on boot animation!
then i reflash the rom! and all okay, but i still can't install the Chainfire 3D Driver!
anyone cant helpme!¿
(sorry my english suck im Costa Rican)
Paulhxc said:
Hi guys, i have a big problem installing The chainfire Driver on my Ace whith CM 10.1-RCO-cooper!
the first time i install the phone stuck on boot animation!
then i reflash the rom! and all okay, but i still can't install the Chainfire 3D Driver!
anyone cant helpme!¿
(sorry my english suck im Costa Rican)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chainfire 3d is not compatible with honeycomb, ice cream sandwich or jellybean.. It's written on their play store description.. Please read properly before creating a thread..
sax0406 said:
Chainfire 3d is not compatible with honeycomb, ice cream sandwich or jellybean.. It's written on their play store description.. Please read properly before creating a thread..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thnxs dude, exist other app like chainfire to play high gama games!?
With ics is compatible, i have cm9 and works Fine, is not compatible with jelly bean.
Send from my Xperia P LT22i using XDA Premium HD
estape11 said:
With ics is compatible, i have cm9 and works Fine, is not compatible with jelly bean.
Send from my Xperia P LT22i using XDA Premium HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mae si mala nota que no sirva en jelly bean!
pero esta tuanis la rom jaja entons vale la pena! :good::laugh:

Categories

Resources