[Q] Temasek's Kernel vs Vadonka's Kernel - LG Optimus 2x

Which is the best?
Temasek OC Kernel vs ETaNa 3.0.35 vs ETaNa 2.6.32
Which one to choose for the best Battery Life, good for Gaming and Stable?
Thanks
Lately with ETaNa 3.0.35 I was having alot of SODs :/

Personnaly, when i'm on GB or MIUI v2, i love the Vadonka's 2.6.x kernel even if it's out-to-date...because it is Stable. The 3.0.x version is not that stable as the 2.6.x but it's updating oftenly once a week. The Temasek's kernel is optimized for his Rom, so if you're on CM7, go for it. Btw, those kernels are very excellent. All depend on what you're gonna do with it. You can try another kernel named ironkrnL by SetiroN. This kernel is good with GB and ICS but this developer isn't on this forum anymore, just google it and you'll find it. He's on google+...
Here's the kernel I use for GB and MIUI (WajkIUI too): derkernel, etana, guestekrnL, Jarvis, Skynet, Temasek, vorkKernel, ironkrnL...
For ICS (CM9): harsh, HP SuperSonic, Jarvis, Nova kernel and also ironkrnL
Finally, just give a try on those kernel and give us feedback.
:good: Push Thanks Button if that help :good:

I was using ETaNa 2.6.32 for about 1 month and was very pleased, then i started flashing the Etana 3.0.xx. In the start they worked very well for me but the latest stable and beta made my phone going crazy, tried all settings like 324Mhz minimum, tried without UV but i got lots of reboots and overheating problems.
Best performance I thing i saw at Etana 3.0.34 and the battery improved too in this version, the 3.0.35 was to unstable to me to get an opinion.
Now about the temasek OC and the Etana 2.6.32 (loc_lite) both on 1200Mhz max i think temasek's kernel is bit better all around and i am using it atm. But still i am waiting for vadonka to get back from vacations to get his 3.0.xx back on track.
I think temasek and vadonka brink the best out of our 2x!!!

Venox85 said:
I was using ETaNa 2.6.32 for about 1 month and was very pleased, then i started flashing the Etana 3.0.xx. In the start they worked very well for me but the latest stable and beta made my phone going crazy, tried all settings like 324Mhz minimum, tried without UV but i got lots of reboots and overheating problems.
Best performance I thing i saw at Etana 3.0.34 and the battery improved too in this version, the 3.0.35 was to unstable to me to get an opinion.
Now about the temasek OC and the Etana 2.6.32 (loc_lite) both on 1200Mhz max i think temasek's kernel is bit better all around and i am using it atm. But still i am waiting for vadonka to get back from vacations to get his 3.0.xx back on track.
I think temasek and vadonka brink the best out of our 2x!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wait for the next AWESOME Spica's kernel. :good: :good: :good:

spica isnt doing kernels for cm7...

Related

Best OC Kernel for cm7.1.0-RC1 ?

I was using the stable 7.0.3 with Dalingrin's OC at 1200, I just upgrade to cm7.1.0-RC1 and now I need to upgrade the kernel as well , the stock for RC1 it only allows OC to 925. So the questions is what OC kernel is recommend for RC1
I forget the exact version, it may be 0630 if someone can confirm, or just dig around for it.
Or update to the newer nightly releases, they have it built in.
I just install the [9/01/11] latest one and so far no issues.
okay now that I have spend some time with the RC1 and the new OC Kernel 9-1-11 when am listening to music it freezes some times and the continues

[Q] kernels, whats it all about ?

Hi all
What is all the kernel talk about ?
I want my phone to run the best...
my current ROM is WIUI 2.1.6
its using swiftkernel, but is that the best ? and whats the difference in all the kernels ?
Thanks to you all, and especially everyone how have made it possible to fool around between ROMs, changed my life for EVER
Here, in this thread you can find links to some kernels. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1441725
The best kernel, is just a matter of taste. Some prefer for example Vadonkas KANG kernel above Ironkernel. So, read the threads and make up your own opinion about it and see for yourself which one works best.
Sent from my LG-Stone from the Prehistory....
Naaaahh... Just kidding!
CM7.2 Temasek KANG P204-30
Ironkernel (Vadonkas KANG)
Hello!
As already stated it is to some extend a matter of taste.
And as always - if it ain't broke don't fix it.
If the SwiftExtremeKernel works for you there is no need to change.
But in short - SwiftExtremeKernel (public) development has been abandoned by its dev so its getting old - this shouldn't be a big problem right now, but you don't get all the shiny new things and bug fixes...
ironkrnL has ramhacks if you can live with certain things not operating you gain memory and a lot of speed though this. I use 32MB ramhack where only reboot isn't working - I can live with that - while the extra memory already speeds up things considerably. Its is balanced between powersave and responsiveness - more to responsiveness and really fast and stable by the way...and tun and cifs are available...
vodonkas KANG Kernel is available in a 00 ramhack version and vodonka tries to make a powersave, a extra responsive kernel and a balanced version - more in his threat in development.
But again - if it ain't broke don't fix it...
Thanks for the small lecture and links
now I just need to know what all the different things means hehe
Very useful thread, so I've learned other thinks about the kernel of this device, now I'm using wiui with SwiftExtreme too, and I have a good battery life, but now I want try the vadonka kernel with the cyano kang version.
Inviato dal mio Optimus 2X usando Tapatalk
I've been trying to understand what are the things to look at when
looking for a kernel for overclocking.
My phone runs on the following
Model number - LG-P990
Android version - 2.3.4
Baseband version - 1035.21_2011075
Kernel version - 2.6.32.9
Build number - GRJ22
LGE Version - LGP990-V20f
Below are kernels based on V20l
Can i install these kernel on my phone (V20f) ?
[KERNEL] fps v0.3a kernel for stock/MCR [2012-01-12]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1414507
**[RC11-R]/[SR2][KERNEL][GPL] HorsePower 2x eXtreme 24BPP for stock MCR FROYO/GB
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1295486

Best Kernel for CM7 Nightlies

Guys,
What's the best Kernels for this rom - CyanogenMod-7 for Optimus 2X - NIGHLTIES
Would like something stable and would push to 1.5 (currently stuck at 1000 standard)
Ta
The best kernel I would recommend is ETaNa Kernel (link in signature), because it's really stable for CM, and you can tweak it a lot with spicas On The Fly pack. Also the battery life is awesome with it. Only, ETaNa Kernel doesn't OC to 1.5Ghz. The HOC version OC's to 1.4Ghz and the LOC version OC's to 1.2Ghz. However the difference between 1.5Ghz and 1.4Ghz isn't noticeable. It doesn't make the phone smoother, it only consumes more battery.
But if you want to OC to 1.5Ghz so badly then I recommend Ironkernel for Gingerbread, you can find it in the dev section.
SP1996AC said:
The best kernel I would recommend is ETaNa Kernel (link in signature), because it's really stable for CM, and you can tweak it a lot with spicas On The Fly pack. Also the battery life is awesome with it. Only, ETaNa Kernel doesn't OC to 1.5Ghz. The HOC version OC's to 1.4Ghz and the LOC version OC's to 1.2Ghz. However the difference between 1.5Ghz and 1.4Ghz isn't noticeable. It doesn't make the phone smoother, it only consumes more battery.
But if you want to OC to 1.5Ghz so badly then I recommend Ironkernel for Gingerbread, you can find it in the dev section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
1.2 - 1.4 would be fine also.
I will give it a go!
Downloading this one
1203050915-ETaNa_HOC_DS_OTF_96M.zip 05-Mar-2012 09:15 4.3M
Seems to be the latest.
choccy31 said:
Hi,
1.2 - 1.4 would be fine also.
I will give it a go!
Downloading this one
1203050915-ETaNa_HOC_DS_OTF_96M.zip 05-Mar-2012 09:15 4.3M
Seems to be the latest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is the latest, but are you sure you want a 96MB Ramhack? You are aware of the fact that some things might not work right? All in all I just think that 96MB is just a little too big. 48MB should be sufficient in my opinion...
Hi,
Yeah it's not installing, stuck on boot screen ;-(
Will try different one.
Thanks
SP1996AC said:
It is the latest, but are you sure you want a 96MB Ramhack? You are aware of the fact that some things might not work right? All in all I just think that 96MB is just a little too big. 48MB should be sufficient in my opinion...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ignore,
Took ages to boot but seems to have worked now.
Fingers crossed all ok on 48MB hoc
Hi guys, i'm currently using Etana, the last release LOC with 0 ramhacked!
Drain battery isn't to high and it's very very smooth ^_*
+1 for Vadonka
I can also suggest the latest Etana kernel. Works fine.
FlynDual said:
Hi guys, i'm currently using Etana, the last release LOC with 0 ramhacked!
Drain battery isn't to high and it's very very smooth ^_*
+1 for Vadonka
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have installed too. Used it long and works great.
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium
ETaNa kernel from Vadonka is amazing
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1427646

[Q] What's the best, most stable, less buggy ICS ROM for i9000?

What are you using and which kernel are you using it with?
Hi!
I've used almost all ICS roms and I think "CodeNameAndroid" and "Nexus S Port by EliteV9"(the base of my rom) are the best ones in this moment
I'd recommend Slim ICS, really good rom, quick and good battery life. I'm using it with Semaphore 0.9.7b, everything seems to work pretty well. Currently in the process of trying different modems for it, trying to get a better gps fix.
Nexus S Port by EliteV9.1
I am using the MIUI-2.3.33 from lucainno
With 3.1.10 IcyGlitch Kernel. But it really needs much energy...
best rom
I think , IMM76D ELITE V 9.1 WITH DEVIL 2_0.62 KERNAL........is the best conf. u ever get till now...............devil kernel was just awsome.....402MB ram...............just go with these confi.
I have try the Elite v9 it is a really good rom.
But now that CodeNameAndroid would be based on ICS 4.0.4 I will try it to
Usually I use the semaphore kernel but it is a personal preference.
I am very happy with my Cyanogenmod 9 AOSP nightly builds.
I am using the latest nightly buid (2012-04-02)
And i am really pleased with the performance!
Installation was done with CWM and easy as pie!
My fav is AOKP build 28 with devil2_0.62 kernel.
most stable rom
flash IMM76D ELITE V9.1 with DEVIL KERNAL 2_0.62.........390MB RAM..............................the best combination so far..............n stable
Elite 9.1, 4.0.4 aosp based, without any doubt.
Best Rom
Here ELite`s v9.1 4.04 with Kernel Devil 0.6.2
WOrks like a charm!!
iall5tar said:
Here ELite`s v9.1 4.04 with Kernel Devil 0.6.2
WOrks like a charm!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can someone who used slim v3.1 with semaphore .9.8sbm please compare with elite v9.1 rom?is it better than slim 4.0.4 version?
also does devil kernel 402 mb version break HD playback and other formats?semaphore .9.8sbm only breaks 720p recording.playback and everything else just fine.
best one : INFINITUM-v1.1.0 with glitch kernel
Elite 9.1 and devil2 0.64. So far so fast and stable with as good battery life as darkyrom GB.
Tried dark knight 4, lots of minor lag and fc here and there.
I'm quite happy with Team ICSSGS http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1398223 and RC4.2. Have been using it for some time now and so far didn't discover any deal breakers.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2
Am happy with Team ICSSGS R4.2 at the moment (with Semaphore 1.0.0s)... Stable with decent performance...
They are working on R5 so, expect that to be awesome as well...
EXTRAordinary_4.0.4_beta9
Among all ICS ROM I have tested (which is many about 1234 ) this one is one of better but of course with other kernel ( midnight ICS 0.90-2 - faster and more stable).Battery life is great almost two days.Only one problem I can`t solve ,I try to fix Google Store but still have problem (Update for Google play could not be downloaded due an error 940 ) . Any help ?.....For now this is the best ICS ROM...i think...
Tiramisù 1.7 and Midnight 0.9.0-2 Hugeram
EliteV10 Beta [4.0.4 IMM76D][ROM]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1575683

[Q]Kernel ?

Hi, I would like to know what is kernel, and what would it change in the phone, performance and display, i'm a gamer, so i would like a good kernel for games like asphalt 6, FL Commando and And NOVA 6, and how to install it, i'm using Zeus 6.32n
thanks a lot
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium. If I Helped You, Hit The Thanks Boutton. Jesus !!
I must admit that p970 is not so hard developed yet and as far as im concerned, we havent got any custom kernel for stock-based rom like Zeus. However, Diana kernel (which is used in newest version of Zeus v.36) is best for performance and battery life. As long as someone wont make a miracle, its only-one custom kernel for stock based ROMs.
In addition, it has overclocking and is tweaked for performance, so why do you need other kernel? Try installing newest version of zeus ROM and test if you are pleased with results.
Similar question: So if i install the newest zeus i already have a new kernel on the phone or do i still need to update the kernel? I now have Zeus v7.03 and the kernel version: 2.6.35. Any help is appreciated! Thx
Hbohd said:
I must admit that p970 is not so hard developed yet and as far as im concerned, we havent got any custom kernel for stock-based rom like Zeus. However, Diana kernel (which is used in newest version of Zeus v.36) is best for performance and battery life. As long as someone wont make a miracle, its only-one custom kernel for stock based ROMs.
In addition, it has overclocking and is tweaked for performance, so why do you need other kernel? Try installing newest version of zeus ROM and test if you are pleased with results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rooney_10 said:
Similar question: So if i install the newest zeus i already have a new kernel on the phone or do i still need to update the kernel? I now have Zeus v7.03 and the kernel version: 2.6.35. Any help is appreciated! Thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you install a newer Zeus Version 6.33 and up you have a different kernel that can use lower and higher frequencies. 2.6.35 is the basic linux kernel, alle Diana kernels have that number too. Up too diana kernel 2.3 it seems to be very stable, after 2.3 the kernels are all betas up till now and well beta is still experimental, for some it works well, for others maybe not. If you install Zeus 7.02 or .03 it comes with a beta kernel, but I'm rather sure you can still install the stable Diana kernel 2.3 after you installed Zeus 7.02 or .03.
BTW all that can be read in http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1454274 , but OK it might take some time to go read that all, but before you ask more questions maybe you should at least try to read some of that thread (first page and maybe about last 3 weeks).
SaschaKH said:
If you install a newer Zeus Version 6.33 and up you have a different kernel that can use lower and higher frequencies. 2.6.35 is the basic linux kernel, alle Diana kernels have that number too. Up too diana kernel 2.3 it seems to be very stable, after 2.3 the kernels are all betas up till now and well beta is still experimental, for some it works well, for others maybe not. If you install Zeus 7.02 or .03 it comes with a beta kernel, but I'm rather sure you can still install the stable Diana kernel 2.3 after you installed Zeus 7.02 or .03.
BTW all that can be read in http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1454274 , but OK it might take some time to go read that all, but before you ask more questions maybe you should at least try to read some of that thread (first page and maybe about last 3 weeks).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for the information! I did read some of the thread, but as you said it will take some time to read the whole thing

Categories

Resources