Database Develop

So...What about Jelly Bean, Android 4.1?

Well, Google has announced an incremental update to Ice Cream Sandwich, called Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, and it's Phone and tablet UI like ICS.
Little info here.
http://developer.android.com/about/versions/jelly-bean.html
So, it's using ICS and Honeycomb driver model, but there are other things like the so-called "LAG free" that seems to be a real change inside android, but I think devs will get a workaround. So, is possible to port this new update?

Paul L. said:
Well, Google has announced an incremental update to Ice Cream Sandwich, called Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, and it's Phone and tablet UI like ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, hope that ...
Right now we still haven't stable Cyanogenmod 9 (ICS),
But I think if we -hope soon, then we could have a stable Cyanogenmod 10 (Jelly Bean) .. What ????!!!! Cyanogenmod 10 !! looks good
Thanks for news
Best Regards

Seems it's not a bug update..close to ics, so just might happen.

Don't forget about hardware limitation.
We won't get all the features from Jelly Bean. Even ICS, we won't.
I think CM9 is already a magical ROM coming for us.
To have a Jelly Bean, it's quadratic magic! lol.
Let's hope we have CM9 without bugs and then AOKP too.
For now, it's more logical.

We have not got ICS till yet and you are talking about jelly bean
Still a long way to go
Real Contributors Dont BeG for Thanks
Cheers

Like I knew somebody is going to ask is somebody going to port JB to our device... it does not give us THAT much improvements to spend time on development.
And, what everybody said above, even ICS is not usable (no camera, lack of RAM, lots of bugs). Luckily, i'm happy with my Gingerbread CM7.2, and i'm just watching the situation closely

ICS CM9 Camera?
Can someone tell me whether Camera is working on the most recent CM9 ROM (GalaxyICS) for Galaxy mini.
I heard that Camera is somewhat working and we may have a working Camera in the next release. Is this true, someone give some info on this, please.

Apourv said:
Can someone tell me whether Camera is working on the most recent CM9 ROM (GalaxyICS) for Galaxy mini.
I heard that Camera is somewhat working and we may have a working Camera in the next release. Is this true, someone give some info on this, please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently it's not working !
But we may have working camera in few releases
Real Contributors Dont BeG for Thanks
Cheers

We already have a working camera in the new upcoming cm 9
Then there will be bug updates though fm radio has a long way to go but stock ics can still get a radio so we can hope cm 10 or jelly bean to start by next year minimum, and cheers.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app

Don't get over-excited guys, ics barely works on gmini right now due to low ram *edit* low EVERYTHING, and I assume that jellybean will simply be more resource-demanding, so just pull your horses until we get properly working ics m'kay? To be honest, I don't believe that we will ever get cm9/ics as stable as cm7, simply due to hardware limitations of galaxy mini.

Next year this phone will be the worstest of the worst... cmon, 600MHz processor in 2013?
Forget about Jelly Bean, we still have bugs in ****ing gingerbread (camera orientation), ICS is not stable enough too...

it is possible to make a buggy android 4.1 port from gnexus ...
but i dont think that that will be cool xD
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

Galaxy Nexus is ARMv7. Just wait for the source.

Question first...Why port something we know won't ever be able to run stable on our device because we don't have drivers which is kept close sourced?
And also that drivers just can't be compiled as with happened to the Adreno200 drivers for ICS to armv6.
You need to rewrite the whole code, possibly even write new code to drivers for our device. And I doubt the people who make these drivers and publish these sort of stuff want to spend any extra work on trying to make it work on our devices.
We'll be stuck with Gingerbread guys. End of story.

No, JB is a "small" update. Drives from ICS will work fine on JB. So, it may even be a little faster. Anyway, I will try to build it when source comes out.

sry not the kernel, it needs to be modded -.-
Send from my Galaxy Tab P1000 using Android 4.1 Alpha 0.1

Everything I want from the JB is offline voice typing.

TheWhisp said:
Everything I want from the JB is offline voice typing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about lagfree UI?
---------- Post added at 05:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:16 PM ----------
domcale said:
Next year this phone will be the worstest of the worst... cmon, 600MHz processor in 2013?
Forget about Jelly Bean, we still have bugs in ****ing gingerbread (camera orientation), ICS is not stable enough too...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The worst is the HTC Dream.

AOKP feels smoother than GB...

KoperKiller said:
The worst is the HTC Dream.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, show me one advanced user that still has HTC Dream as his main phone? After all it has 528 MHz CPU (slow POS just like our mini), and has been released 2 years (or more?) earlier than Galaxy mini - how can you compare that?
And.. why would one buy an HTC - they are so ****ing complicate to flash - HBOOT, fastboot, bootloader downgrade, firmware downgrade, using the command prompt in windows - nothing here on Samsung

Will our Galaxy Mini's/Pop's get Jelly Bean?

Hello everybody. I want to ask our developers, will we get Android 4.1? If not - why, if yes - when? Thanks for answers .

I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too

vishal007 said:
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Best Regards

It is hard to get a stable ics as of now it is goin to take minimum 6 to 7 seven months before a bugfree ics and then only we can look forward to jb we muat have patience.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app

Well, when the sources are out, we'll see about that

Patience is a virtue moreover there isn't much difference in user looks
Just a few add ons here and there moreover I doubt about how will this device go on with jb.But anyways well see that expect stable jb for our device by early 2013.Many experimental build will start popping out soon

vishal007 said:
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GOOD NEWS !
MACLAW SUCCESS MAKE AOSP WORKING FOR ARM V6 !!!!! :victory:

kagamineryuki said:
GOOD NEWS !
MACLAW SUCCESS MAKE AOSP WORKING FOR ARM V6 !!!!! :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
congrats
but its only for gio till now may be ace too but maclaw didnt tell any news for mini/fit aosp
they r saying they dont hav device to work on :crying:

vishal007 said:
congrats
but its only for gio till now may be ace too but maclaw didnt tell any news for mini/fit aosp
they r saying they dont hav device to work on :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
owww, that's why maclaw search for volunteer who have galaxy mini
btw thanks for information
sorry for my bad english

there won't be fully working ics/jb because no one willing to re-write damn codecs... y'all have fully working cm7, be happy with that, or buy yourself nexus s or one x, which have ics from the start. Peoples! Stop dreaming and expecting wonders from heavily outdated phone!

Maybe the devs will do something, if the rest of the people is willing to wait!

AOKP build with modified libstagefrighthw.so can play 720p @ ~10 (maybe more) fps, HQ youtube works ( as testers reported ). If AntiBillOS will give permissions camera will be working with 3rd party apps too. So... it's not so impossible after all.

Ok, so camera will work, but only ON HACKS. That's great, really. How about stability of os? :>

no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw

ajay8055 said:
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, cm10 will be android 5.0... jellybean will be cm9.1 or something like that, since jellybean is just an update of ics...

yackovsky said:
no, cm10 will be android 5.0... jellybean will be cm9.1 or something like that, since jellybean is just an update of ics...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
might be if we get a stable ics we can get jelly bean to work..but we need something out of the ordinary

ajay8055 said:
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From latest Marcin comments, GalaxyICS will drop Mini / Fit support.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app

yackovsky said:
there won't be fully working ics/jb because no one willing to re-write damn codecs... y'all have fully working cm7, be happy with that, or buy yourself nexus s or one x, which have ics from the start. Peoples! Stop dreaming and expecting wonders from heavily outdated phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup, i agree with u. The only issue with cm9 (for me at least) is the lack of RAM, i dont care abt the "crappy camera" or "useless" FM.

all devices haing cm9 or aosp ics can run jellybean

goutamniwas said:
all devices haing cm9 or aosp ics can run jellybean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, but the question is not if they can, because it's obvious that galaxy mini is able to run ics/jb, the question is: can it be runned smoothly on low end phone? and i'm only guessing that the answer is no, because of extremely low specs (compared to other phones nowaday) of galaxy mini

ICS vs Jelly Bean

I have read that JellyBean uses a new kind of engine that keeps the Galaxy Nexus very fast!
So, does this mean, when Jellybean is ported to Galaxy Mini, the phone's performance will increase?
:good:

Jellybean includes "Project Butter", which makes the whole experience, well, butter-smooth.
When ported, it should normally be as smooth on any other phone.
-----------
"You can overclock as much as you want, your phone will always seem too slow."

just wait till its ported and u will have your answer

rohan007 said:
just wait till its ported and u will have your answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much!
And i guess JB will have to use the same drivers that had to be used in ICS.
So, We will have to wait for someone to develop something similar to the OMX drivers..

supreethms said:
Thank you very much!
And i guess JB will have to use the same drivers that had to be used in ICS.
So, We will have to wait for someone to develop something similar to the OMX drivers..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jelly bean is an improvement in ics with some new features added and it is also true that its framework is also a bit changed but still is 4.1 not 5.0, so not much changes are expected

dhlalit11 said:
jelly bean is an improvement in ics with some new features added and it is also true that its framework is also a bit changed but still is 4.1 not 5.0, so not much changes are expected
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But, project butter must be the biggest change.

4.1 JB for Captivate?

Hey guys, just out of curiosity, will we ever get Jellybean ported to the Captivate? If so how long does this process normally take?
Sorry I have no idea how these things work, not being impatient, just wondering.
Thanks

If you want it that bad, the TAJB port for I9000 works fine on our phone with the latest Devil Kernel
It's a slightly long process to get everything(SMS+phone) to work
1: clear dalvik, normal cache, and wipe data
2: flash TAJB .45
3: flash devil Kernel
4: search through thread and flash test modem for phone calls and SMS
5: place the audio_policy.conf from the nexus s port into the system/etc/ folder
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

There's another thread discussing Jelly Bean for Captivate. You might want to check that one. It doesn't have any firm timeframes for any of the ROMs to release a 4.1 version, but it does confirm that they're working on it.

Try this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1775373, it works fine for me. Only things that do not work - Camera and Sound notifications. Otherwise, it is pretty awesome. :laugh:

Yeah ,JB on Cap but camera and youtube not work

fancy90 said:
Yeah ,JB on Cap but camera and youtube not work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umm.. there is a fix for the youtube in unofficial cm10 android 4.1 thread in the captivate android development thread...

irfarf said:
umm.. there is a fix for the youtube in unofficial cm10 android 4.1 thread in the captivate android development thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh , I install cm10 v2 is working good

Just flashed it using the directions posted.
Can't seem to get my Data to connect. Won't save any apn's I add to it to connect. The phone can locate the appropriate Network Operator (CAN Rogers Wireless Inc.), but data will not connect.Also, when I go to the Data Usage tab, it doesn't show a tab that lets you see Data na dWireless usage like it did in ICS.
Any ideas on how to fix?? JellyBean is wicked smooth for such an ealy release and I'd hate to revert back to CM9 (it was not cooperating with my cappy!)

I'm on jb, and everything seems to be working extremely well for such am early alpha release! Running the unofficial Cm10v2 with devil kernel
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app

It's awesome!
TheSchatz said:
I'm on jb, and everything seems to be working extremely well for such am early alpha release! Running the unofficial Cm10v2 with devil kernel
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, just installed it last night and it's smoother than any rom I've EVER used! That project butter google built for jb is crazy smooth

Funny thing guys, Project butter hasn't been incorporated into the kernels yet. The v-sync and timings have to be messed with. So if you think it's smooth now, wait until project butter is actually running

b-eock said:
Funny thing guys, Project butter hasn't been incorporated into the kernels yet. The v-sync and timings have to be messed with. So if you think it's smooth now, wait until project butter is actually running
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's ridiculous. I noticed an amazing jump in smoothness from the latest CM9 nightly to the V2 of the Jelly Bean ROM and if it's only gonna get better, I can't wait to see how fast it gets. Still very, very minor bugs that barely affect functionality at all, but man is it fast!

ya i noticed it was crazy smooth as well. but couldn't live w/o camera. so i went back to remics-ux. which is almost identically smooth imo. cant wait util we actually get project butter and a fully functional jb rom

Phlashaholic said:
ya i noticed it was crazy smooth as well. but couldn't live w/o camera. so i went back to remics-ux. which is almost identically smooth imo. cant wait util we actually get project butter and a fully functional jb rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remics ICS is what I'm still running, this rom with Sephamore kernel is just incredibly responsive and smooth.

shariqm said:
Remics ICS is what I'm still running, this rom with Sephamore kernel is just incredibly responsive and smooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You ought to relook the JB ROMs. I'm using DerTeufel's, and haven't had any problems with any component in the last three releases.
cbalt and dave have stripped down versions of DerTeufel's port, and by all reports, they're worth of being your daily driver, too.

peteypoo said:
You ought to relook the JB ROMs. I'm using DerTeufel's, and haven't had any problems with any component in the last three releases.
cbalt and dave have stripped down versions of DerTeufel's port, and by all reports, they're worth of being your daily driver, too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been on cbalt's version like 4 I think since 28 July as daily with no problem camera working and even TV out
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium

[Q] GB, ICS, or JB?

I just got a Galaxy S and am surprised to see so many JB roms available.
I would probably switch over to this phone from my Xperia S, just to use Voodoo Sound
My question is, is JB roms currently stable enough compared to ICS or GB?
Please provide feedback only if you've tried all three versions before :silly:

Yes jb is good i have tried most roms and i blv super nexus rom is very good .. But u cant customize it.. Try it your self ...
Sent from my GT-I9000

Yup, JB is very stable. Personally Liquidsmooth or RemICS-JB are fantastic.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD

Only ICS ROMs
Stupidest said:
I just got a Galaxy S and am surprised to see so many JB roms available.
I would probably switch over to this phone from my Xperia S, just to use Voodoo Sound
My question is, is JB roms currently stable enough compared to ICS or GB?
Please provide feedback only if you've tried all three versions before :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dear,
I am developing only the FlymeOS for i9000 at now ; soon i will developing a Custom Rom with 4.0.4 base...
You can really forget JB Roms , the one good JB for i9000 is only 4.1.2 ; you can forget JB 4.2.1 and 4.2.2
They are quite fast at beginning , but you will notice how lazy they are going to be ..
I highly recommend ICS roms , because they are really fast and they haven't bugs.
There are some apps that are only avalible for Android 4.0+ (like Nova Launcher) , and so I really can't see that ICS is outdated.
Thats why i only develop and port roms for ICS on i9000 device.

UnlimitedRom said:
Dear,
I am developing only the FlymeOS for i9000 at now ; soon i will developing a Custom Rom with 4.0.4 base...
You can really forget JB Roms , the one good JB for i9000 is only 4.1.2 ; you can forget JB 4.2.1 and 4.2.2
They are quite fast at beginning , but you will notice how lazy they are going to be ..
I highly recommend ICS roms , because they are really fast and they haven't bugs.
There are some apps that are only avalible for Android 4.0+ (like Nova Launcher) , and so I really can't see that ICS is outdated.
Thats why i only develop and port roms for ICS on i9000 device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, agreed here. Don't get us (or at least me) wrong, 4.2.2 is fantastic. But ICS is rock stable in just about eery aspect and 4.1.2 is pretty damn good as well if you still want to consider Jelly Bean.
Although @UnlimitedRom, you have to admit Google Now is pretty neat
A lot of JB apks can be pushed manually or installed normally on ICS roms anyway.. Just that ICs roms in general are less customiseable than JB roms.
By the way, FlymeOS is looking goooood
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD

Soryuu said:
Yup, agreed here. Don't get us (or at least me) wrong, 4.2.2 is fantastic. But ICS is rock stable in just about eery aspect and 4.1.2 is pretty damn good as well if you still want to consider Jelly Bean.
Although @UnlimitedRom, you have to admit Google Now is pretty neat
A lot of JB apks can be pushed manually or installed normally on ICS roms anyway.. Just that ICs roms in general are less customiseable than JB roms.
By the way, FlymeOS is looking goooood
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google Now ... is somebody using it? It think it's kinda useless , it is my opinion.
Only 4.1.2 is a good Jelly Bean for i9000
I really can't see that ICS should be a old OS ; as you have said that JB apk's can be installed on ICS...
I bet that if i9000 device is to lazy for Android 5.0 , there will be lots developers who develop for 4.0.4 ...
Thank you, i am still working on it to get bugs away

UnlimitedRom said:
Google Now ... is somebody using it? It think it's kinda useless , it is my opinion.
Only 4.1.2 is a good Jelly Bean for i9000
I really can't see that ICS should be a old OS ; as you have said that JB apk's can be installed on ICS...
I bet that if i9000 device is to lazy for Android 5.0 , there will be lots developers who develop for 4.0.4 ...
Thank you, i am still working on it to get bugs away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, when google released 4.2 I don't really see the point of it except for some nicer animations or not so important functions.
I was shocked at the sheer number of JB roms for this phone at first because on my previous experiences, JB don't work really well on single core phones
I'd give JB a try first and if it's really bad I would try out the rom of yours, it looks great

Stupidest said:
Yeah, when google released 4.2 I don't really see the point of it except for some nicer animations or not so important functions.
I was shocked at the sheer number of JB roms for this phone at first because on my previous experiences, JB don't work really well on single core phones
I'd give JB a try first and if it's really bad I would try out the rom of yours, it looks great
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JB roms is for dual-core phones to run smooth , thats why GT-i9100 got 4.2.2 ; cause it is a dual-core..
Thank you , in 4-5 days i release the bugfree version of my rom , it is better that you wait the 4-5 days for it if you want my rom

UnlimitedRom said:
Google Now ... is somebody using it? It think it's kinda useless , it is my opinion.
Only 4.1.2 is a good Jelly Bean for i9000
I really can't see that ICS should be a old OS ; as you have said that JB apk's can be installed on ICS...
I bet that if i9000 device is to lazy for Android 5.0 , there will be lots developers who develop for 4.0.4 ...
Thank you, i am still working on it to get bugs away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, you never know, rumours are flaoting around that 5.0 is going to be optimised for devices with a 1Ghz processor and 512MB of rom( (one or the other or both). So you never know, 5.0 might really bring the S back to life
But yeah, 4.0.4 is a really good base for the I9000. Smooth, stable but not too taxing for the processor at all (not to mention some pretty good battery life, daaaaaaamn)
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD
---------- Post added at 11:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:03 PM ----------
Stupidest said:
Yeah, when google released 4.2 I don't really see the point of it except for some nicer animations or not so important functions.
I was shocked at the sheer number of JB roms for this phone at first because on my previous experiences, JB don't work really well on single core phones
I'd give JB a try first and if it's really bad I would try out the rom of yours, it looks great
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, agreed. The JB roms optimised for gaming work decently- although that's HEAVILY optimised and debloated to give as quick an experience as possible. But it's an OS optimised mostly for dual cores and above. There are very few single-core devices- if at all- that run 4.1 officially, and for pretty damn good reason. Only one I can think of is the Nexus S (Nexus version of the Galaxy S, bearing in mind), and even then 4.2 was dropped for that device. So while its still possible to have Jelly Bean fully functional, at the end of the day...
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD