Database Develop

[Q] CM9 instead of stock ICS?

I lived with stock ICS for about 10 days. I really prefer it to GB, but there are nuisances as well. Like everything getting stuck for about 10 seconds sometimes.
Do you think moving to a third-party ICS ROM would be a good idea? Which ROM is usually the best?

Cassie literom or cm9 nightly.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

ICS... I don't think any wow factor in there.. I have been using ICS since its release. Now am in custom ICS... Here are the main concerned for me. (may be still I didn't figured it out a soution)
1.Social network??? No Facebook support for contacts and calendar (third party works good but what is the meaning of smartphone?)
2. Text to speech???? I couldn't find talk back and couldn't setup navigation speech guidance (being a big headache)
3. Smooth????.... Ahhh no.. Not comparable to windows 7.5 or some other low end HTC devices (like wildfire S exampe)
4. Speed??? Yes ofcourse... I can feel the difference.. But I am not a rocket launcher to be perfect in micro seconds in everything.. GB is not less in this.
5. Performance??? I don't think they have used real potential of the processor and graphics
6. Additional Features???? Where is it... Where is it... Where is it....
7. UI??? I can vote here..
8. Memory handling.??? I have used number of apps in GB and I never I got once that am running out of memory...
9. Safety???? OMG.. Definitely no wipes.. Till a bug fix.
10. User friendly??? I don't think anything has improved form GB.
These are all my perspectives... I'm not a skilled user or developer.. Definitely developer may have the fix for these.. But I feel a major update should satisfy a normal person like me. That I don't find in the update and setting up something should be smart and effortless.
Now am planning to go back to GB if I couldn't solve all these.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

thehackersz said:
Cassie literom or cm9 nightly.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There aren't any known drawbacks in these ROMs I hope? Heard that not everything worked alright with the early ICS ROMs.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA

thameera said:
There aren't any known drawbacks in these ROMs I hope? Heard that not everything worked alright with the early ICS ROMs.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Current CM nightly works for me in every angle.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

CM9, always go for AOSP. So much advantages over TouchWizzed roms - especially if you look at performance.

Akiainavas said:
CM9, always go for AOSP. So much advantages over TouchWizzed roms - especially if you look at performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have seen some developers using CM9 rom as base I think... Do you prefer anything particular?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

For me i swear by CM9, it`s solid, fast and most issues (should they arise) are solved within a couple of days (nightly`s). You will loose the S-pen options but there are apps in the Playstore for that.
AOSP/AOKP is also solid and fast but is more costumizable as for UI, but less updates .
I guess it`s best to both try them out and decide what suits you best.

priyanv said:
I have seen some developers using CM9 rom as base I think... Do you prefer anything particular?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Asylum. Totally lightweight, can be tailored into anything you want, smooth as silk and quick as a lightning.

Thanks for the replies everyone. I'm going to try CM9 first. But it seems Galaxy Note isn't listed in the cyanogenmod.com supported devices list. Where can I get the latest ROM for Note?

thameera said:
Thanks for the replies everyone. I'm going to try CM9 first. But it seems Galaxy Note isn't listed in the cyanogenmod.com supported devices list. Where can I get the latest ROM for Note?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here.

chasmodo said:
Here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! One more question. Will following those steps wipe everything currently there is in my phone? Like all the apps installed and data in the sdcard?

thameera said:
Thanks! One more question. Will following those steps wipe everything currently there is in my phone? Like all the apps installed and data in the sdcard?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will wipe all the apps..
Data on SD card will be safe..

chintamanijaipuri said:
It will wipe all the apps..
Data on SD card will be safe..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah okay. Thanks a lot!

thameera said:
Ah okay. Thanks a lot!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pressing thanks button is much better.

chintamanijaipuri said:
Pressing thanks button is much better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done

What Jelly Bean Rom are you guys using

Hi all.
I had mixed fellings about ICS. its new and gud but gingerbread was better.
So whats ur say on the JB roms. Which one are you using and how is ur experience with it so far.
Im on official JB rom GNexus. Its good and perhaps better than most ICS.
P.S do these ports have project butter in them?
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
edit : Please delete this thread... i didn't see the sticky. Sorry

[ROM] [jRO03C] OFFICIAL <B4> ANDROID 4.1.1 (JELLY BEAN) GNEX STOCK ROM (07/18/12)

Cm10
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2

I would wait a bit with JB until the main bugs are fixed. But I would propably test CM10 first.

I'm using Team Android Jelly Bean's version, V6 Beta. I'd recommend waiting till V7 is out, or try to find V5 somewhere on the internet. V6 is quite a bit laggy.

Slim ICS with DPI set pretty close to normal. It has no datadata/vsync/butter (none do atm) and it is super smooth and 8/10 for stability. Pretty good for an alpha release.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

AlwaysDroid said:
Slim ICS with DPI set pretty close to normal. It has no datadata/vsync/butter (none do atm) and it is super smooth and 8/10 for stability. Pretty good for an alpha release.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I flashed SlimBean today and once I'd worked my way past the bootloops, connection issues and TB FC's it's working nicely. :fingers-crossed:
AlwaysDroid, you've got the Devil kernel happening - which file did you use? The Devil3_1.0.0-Rc3_JB_i9000_CFS_BLN_VC_20120718 file or the Devil3_1.0.0-Rc3_JB_i9000_CFS_BLN_CMC_20120718? I'd love to give it a shot, but I really don't want to flash the wrong file - I've had a few soft bricks that scared the poop outta me until I managed to get them righted!

Does anyone has a link to the Team Android Jelly Bean's v5??

i´m using cm10 from 20120723 for aprox 2 hours now and compared to the last cm9 nigthly i think its in some points a little bit slower.
the launcher is very fast but if i wanna switch apps it takes several seconds.
and also in the settings its slower. but i have to say that i´m syncing a lot of contacts by using myphonexplorer during the time i´m testing.
hopefully it will get better after the sync.
and i read that it will get better after a day or 2 of usage.

malikusmanrasheed said:
Hi all
...
edit : Please delete this thread... i didn't see the sticky. Sorry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, yeah...
Glad to see at least OP found sticky thread. If you are unable to delete what you started, please contact moderator.
Don't know if it's possible to report yourself?

2Pietjuh2 said:
I'm using Team Android Jelly Bean's version, V6 Beta. I'd recommend waiting till V7 is out, or try to find V5 somewhere on the internet. V6 is quite a bit laggy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second that. V5 worked fine for me. V6 seemed a bit faster, but loads of new bugs. Then the carrier signals disappeared so im back on V5.

I am using the CM10 by pawitp
...click me...
It´s ok and im satisfied because the main features (sms, data, wifi) work great, but there are still many bugs.
But I think if you wait another 2 or 3 weeks, the builds will be great. At the moment it´s only an alpha version.. so don't expect too much

i am using cm10 but there are some bugs. i am looking forward to the update version.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

I'm using CM10....by pawitp.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

I'm using SlimBean 1.0. Haven't noticed any issues so far, aside from not being able to access your external SD card when connected to pc. (mtp fix aside) Have yet to check the battery usage, gonna let it sit for a week.

GNEXUS Port ROM JRO03E by Elitemovil no trouble,lag free,fast and feel like to use pure Google AOSP JB
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2

I am using the CM10 by pawitp :good:

I am using CM10 by epinter. Not bad same bugs as ICS, just needs 2 things: long press to skip to the next song and WiFi tethering. Other than that not bad and I can't get too mad the for build was made like two weeks ago, and he has made a lot of updates.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app

Sinse yersterday Helly Bean v10, IMHO best JB on xda.

jelly bean rom
hi there
using pawitps jb alpha rom cm10, quite stable for an alpha but hey must have testers to test it and help with developement , which i'm glad to do and any help we can give developers i think is a good thing. quite a few bugs as has been said , but if we can use it everyday i'm happy even if there is lag and bugs for now, i know it will be sooo good when finished .
see ya

Android 4.2 SGS

Is there some development for 4.2 on the I9000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

Of course it is. Bellow it's a quote from the developer Pawitp which maintain CyanogenMod CM10 for I9000.
pawitp said:
About 4.2, I don't really see any feature which will make you want to upgrade right away (from a user point of view).
From a device point of view, there shouldn't be much difficulties for us as most parts are already open source. The main difficulty would be that SurfaceFlinger currently rejects old hwcomposer, but CM should take care of that soon. They've also changed the bluetooth subsystem around, but we shouldn't have any problem with that. The most time consuming part would be to merge the current CM codebase with AOSP, since they are bound to be many conflicts.
The I9000 will get 4.2, but no ETA!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

MoshuXXL said:
Of course it is. Bellow it's a quote from the developer Pawitp which maintain CyanogenMod CM10 for I9000.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sample ROM is now available here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2004118
Pretty much everything already works! Certainly well enough that you could use it as your day-to-day ROM.

There is also a Galaxy Nexus 4.2 port from Elitemovil
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2004906&page=5

4.2
gitch101 said:
Is there some development for 4.2 on the I9000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes there is
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2000656

will work 4.2 camera for this phone or not? because I have an SGS+ and 4.2 camera doesn't work

TheRippaG said:
will work 4.2 camera for this phone or not? because I have an SGS+ and 4.2 camera doesn't work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera 4.2 works in SGS. But the photosphere function is not supported because SGS has no gyroscope, a requirement for photosphere to work.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

Kernel 3.0

Is the this new kernal going to make our jb aosp ROMs smoother ??
Specially cyanvivo, is there going to be a difference?? I think its already so smooth.
And what's about games?? Will the ROM handle them better somehow??
Thanks
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app

anonymousss said:
Is the this new kernal going to make our jb aosp ROMs smoother ??
Specially cyanvivo, is there going to be a difference?? I think its already so smooth.
And what's about games?? Will the ROM handle them better somehow??
Thanks
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This has been answered at least 10 times =).
Anyway, The kernel we have right now is 3.0 but works only on sense. Some dev(s) are trying to get it to work on AOSP roms. Most of the bugs in the current Jellybean AOSP roms are related to that we use old kernel which has no possibility of fixing those issues. You can see the issues in their respective threads, they are similar if not identical. I really doubt it will be smoother , but considering it will fix a lot bugs it might be possible.
Regarding games, I have no clue. Don't games run smooth already?
I haven't come across any game that doesn't run smooth on my phone. Of course I don't run Jelly bean, but still.

Evilus said:
This has been answered at least 10 times =).
Anyway, The kernel we have right now is 3.0 but works only on sense. Some dev(s) are trying to get it to work on AOSP roms. Most of the bugs in the current Jellybean AOSP roms are related to that we use old kernel which has no possibility of fixing those issues. You can see the issues in their respective threads, they are similar if not identical. I really doubt it will be smoother , but considering it will fix a lot bugs it might be possible.
Regarding games, I have no clue. Don't games run smooth already?
I haven't come across any game that doesn't run smooth on my phone. Of course I don't run Jelly bean, but still.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
szezso has got a booting 3.x kernel for AOSP ICS, just some minor issues to iron out.
He's got an ICS ROM in his CM10 thread, running an AOSP 3.x kernel

Evilus said:
This has been answered at least 10 times =).
Anyway, The kernel we have right now is 3.0 but works only on sense. Some dev(s) are trying to get it to work on AOSP roms. Most of the bugs in the current Jellybean AOSP roms are related to that we use old kernel which has no possibility of fixing those issues. You can see the issues in their respective threads, they are similar if not identical. I really doubt it will be smoother , but considering it will fix a lot bugs it might be possible.
Regarding games, I have no clue. Don't games run smooth already?
I haven't come across any game that doesn't run smooth on my phone. Of course I don't run Jelly bean, but still.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u r on ICS or jb, just try subway surfer and u will understand
When i tried subway surfer on cm7, it worked smooth enough for me.
Not perfect smooth though
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app

Splux said:
szezso has got a booting 3.x kernel for AOSP ICS, just some minor issues to iron out.
He's got an ICS ROM in his CM10 thread, running an AOSP 3.x kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok I must have missed that part, that's cool that means CM10 and 10.1 will be easy enough
anonymousss said:
If u r on ICS or jb, just try subway surfer and u will understand
When i tried subway surfer on cm7, it worked smooth enough for me.
Not perfect smooth though
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no issues at all with subway surfers, runs smooth as butter

Evilus said:
Oh ok I must have missed that part, that's cool that means CM10 and 10.1 will be easy enough
I have no issues at all with subway surfers, runs smooth as butter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK do u mind telling me ur rom and kernel and kernel config and subway surfer version??
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app

anonymousss said:
OK do u mind telling me ur rom and kernel and kernel config and subway surfer version??
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I ran project x 4.0 with redux 0.8 kernel with default kernel and oc'd to 1200 , worked fine in both cases.
With current rom and kernel(see my signature) it works fine too.
Latest subway version whatever that is

Evilus said:
Well I ran project x 4.0 with redux 0.8 kernel with default kernel and oc'd to 1200 , worked fine in both cases.
With current rom and kernel(see my signature) it works fine too.
Latest subway version whatever that is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really want to know what's your high score in subway surfer!!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app

anonymousss said:
I really want to know what's your high score in subway surfer!!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can't remember but quite high

Evilus said:
can't remember but quite high
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol OK I just wanted to know because u can't get high scores if the lags too much :s
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app

Yes it will make them smoother
Currently jellybean custom Roms are running on gingerbread kernel
Kernel 3.0 is an ics or jb kernel
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA Premium HD app

[WIP][CM10.1-11] CyanogenMod 10.1 based KitKat ROM

I have modded the source of CM10.1 and added some KitKat features. Compiled with Linaro toolchain. And now debugging it.
Here's the link to the test ROMs.
Tester please test it. And developers please help me.
Screenshots in attachments
Builds are final for kernel and resources. Now will port KitKat specific apps
THIS ROM IS NOT FOR DAILY USE YET
Kernel source
Thanks to AndroidARMv6, CyanogenMod and Google

Test ROM 1
Initial Release
Test ROM 2
Changes:
fixed platlogo issue
updated kernel
Test ROM 3
Changes:
Changed a few res.
Updated kernel

Downloading and Testing!!!

rhar**** said:
Test ROM 2
Changes:
fixed platlogo issue
updated kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it is not just a themed cm10.1! :thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium

nomancoolboy said:
So it is not just a themed cm10.1! :thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. I have changed the source files n debugging them

Its solid so far ..... Can you tell us what to test out for you ? Everything is working great
Thanks Bro
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium

johnhale said:
Its solid so far ..... Can you tell us what to test out for you ? Everything is working great
Thanks Bro
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test everything. And look for layout bugs more.

I will also test it later on today. I'm presently using your other ROM and I am quite pleased with it .
What is actually the difference between them? I got the impression both are based on cm10.1 with some KK additions?

Can anyone post simple screenshots please?
Thanks,
Marco Marinho

jaibar said:
I will also test it later on today. I'm presently using your other ROM and I am quite pleased with it .
What is actually the difference between them? I got the impression both are based on cm10.1 with some KK additions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ROM is compiled from edited source, with features from KitKat. The older one was cm10.1 made to look like KitKat with some of its features

_MarcoMarinho_ said:
Can anyone post simple screenshots please?
Thanks,
Marco Marinho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont have screenshots. Jus two of em. I'll upload them soon
EDIT: Uploaded

Congrats and salutations! Gone beyond cooking and actually into development. Welcome aboard.
As I said, I am using cm10.2. Has bluetooth problem (partly better but not really well-behaved in cm10.1) but it does run much nicer than cm10.1. Also prefer its notifications features. Of course, sources you backport might gain some more speed and smoothness for your hybrid as well. As far as I got with cm11 experimentals, bluetooth turned on and off like in the old days. Found KitKat too dependent on Chromium which is armv7 so lets out our devices. So maybe your approach is the way to go. Are you daring to touch ART (OK, your ROMs are a work of art)??
What are you doing about selinux? Old recoveries will flash the ROM?
Fix camera default exposure? Have everyone eating out of your hand
All the best. Watching this one!

Dovidhalevi said:
Congrats and salutations! Gone beyond cooking and actually into development. Welcome aboard.
As I said, I am using cm10.2. Has bluetooth problem (partly better but not really well-behaved in cm10.1) but it does run much nicer than cm10.1. Also prefer its notifications features. Of course, sources you backport might gain some more speed and smoothness for your hybrid as well. As far as I got with cm11 experimentals, bluetooth turned on and off like in the old days. Found KitKat too dependent on Chromium which is armv7 so lets out our devices. So maybe your approach is the way to go. Are you daring to touch ART (OK, your ROMs are a work of art)??
What are you doing about selinux? Old recoveries will flash the ROM?
Fix camera default exposure? Have everyone eating out of your hand
All the best. Watching this one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just ported small features till now. selinux and all are from cm10.1. So will be compatible with old kernels too.
And camera exposure an things are secondary, as can use third party apps as of now.
And thanks for wishes

I tested the ROM and it seems having no problems but the cm10.1 ones. It looks just like a themed ROM. Good luck for next versions and I have a request . can you plz build a paranoid android ROM under 4.3.1? THX in advance
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app

borchaniz said:
I tested the ROM and it seems having no problems but the cm10.1 ones. It looks just like a themed ROM. Good luck for next versions and I have a request . can you plz build a paranoid android ROM under 4.3.1? THX in advance
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can try to. At least for Paranoid Android 4.2

rhar**** said:
I can try to. At least for Paranoid Android 4.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish you try
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk

Does anyone know how to change Resources according to theme of apps?
Like Holo dark background is activated when an app uses holo.dark theme and Holo light background when an app uses holo.light theme
I need it ASAP as i'm gonna compile another test build

Really amazing rom .!
Using it from 24 hours ..
Still no slow downs ..
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk

Was sick for past few days. But guys, don't worry. I'm all fine now with the last test build.
Link: https://www.mediafire.com/?pxjb3ylm0no0nqt

rhar**** said:
Was sick for past few days. But guys, don't worry. I'm all fine now with the last test build.
Link: https://www.mediafire.com/?pxjb3ylm0no0nqt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changelog please:what::what:
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk