Cm 9 which one ? - Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Het guy.s there are now a lot of CM 9 roms...but which ons is the best for me for every dat usage.
I tested many...

kingsnoopy said:
Het guy.s there are now a lot of CM 9 roms...but which ons is the best for me for every dat usage.
I tested many...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude why creating a new thread , ask in the general section . please try urself ... every rom is diff for diff person ... so try out yourself

ivendor

all of them!

MIUI based on ivendor ROM

1. i was thinking this is DEV section ?
2. we dont have general section about i9001 ! (9000 aint 9001!)
3. I dont know realy what are the biggest diffrent bettwen 2 of those CM9, but still im waiting for full workinf camera with more than 5 pictures.

I used Arco's CM9 since built 4 and yesterday I moved to enthroix and CastagnaIT kernel. It was very laggy so I changed to Ivendor's built 5, a little better but still laggy. So now I'm going back to Arco's since it's the original one and is the one that worked better for me. But as others already said, try and find the one that suits you most.

binlalo said:
I used Arco's CM9 since built 4 and yesterday I moved to enthroix and CastagnaIT kernel. It was very laggy so I changed to Ivendor's built 5, a little better but still laggy. So now I'm going back to Arco's since it's the original one and is the one that worked better for me. But as others already said, try and find the one that suits you most.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same thing as you...i will try now paranoid...

arco's cm9 build 8

arco's cm9 much cleaner then ivendor. anyone can see it in logcat!!! ivendor use so much hacky way and get allways a little bit lag (but has got bln support).

yussuf007 said:
arco's cm9 much cleaner then ivendor. anyone can see it in logcat!!! ivendor use so much hacky way and get allways a little bit lag (but has got bln support).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make it better.
Derp.......

binlalo said:
I used Arco's CM9 since built 4 and yesterday I moved to enthroix and CastagnaIT kernel. It was very laggy so I changed to Ivendor's built 5, a little better but still laggy. So now I'm going back to Arco's since it's the original one and is the one that worked better for me. But as others already said, try and find the one that suits you most.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does camera is working as it works in ivendor????
Sent from my GT-i9001 using xda app-developers app

Curently, all of cm9 roms have same status of cammera: working till 5 picture, random FC. Few people report the camera fully working in 3rg party cam apps.

wow....im shocked that mods didnt close this thread...isnt it against the rules of xda..?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

yussuf007 said:
arco's cm9 much cleaner then ivendor. anyone can see it in logcat!!! ivendor use so much hacky way and get allways a little bit lag (but has got bln support).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. It has bln but it's not working! I used bln control and it says that my backlights does not support blm.. anyone could help me? I have invendor beta 4 and c' kernel 5.6!

Is there any cm9 ROM that features OTA Updates?

GabanBajaHitam said:
wow....im shocked that mods didnt close this thread...isnt it against the rules of xda..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why close?? Bowl but agree with a good rom???? I have tried several roms but there is no 1 who is perect. I'm curious who the best rom has created. so again who has the best CM9 rom created? no difficult question right?

kingsnoopy said:
why close?? Bowl but agree with a good rom???? I have tried several roms but there is no 1 who is perect. I'm curious who the best rom has created. so again who has the best CM9 rom created? no difficult question right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you opened your thread in developers section, and it has nothing to do with developing.

zimmbadroid said:
Because you opened your thread in developers section, and it has nothing to do with developing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not agree! ...I'm someone who the various roms test and therefore may I be there what about say!. I find that the roms are not stable and want to know what there is stable enough for everyday use. That is not to say that I do not respect the gentlemen ...Gentlemen go by, because without you guys especially my phone is just ****! ...THANX:good:

kingsnoopy said:
I do not agree! ...I'm someone who the various roms test and therefore may I be there what about say!. I find that the roms are not stable and want to know what there is stable enough for everyday use. That is not to say that I do not respect the gentlemen ...Gentlemen go by, because without you guys especially my phone is just ****! ...THANX:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wheter you agree or disagree thats the forum rules!
Edit: all those informations can be found in ROMs threads.

Related

[Q] Which ICS ROM?

Any recomendation?
having used both CM9 and AOKP on my Galaxy 8.9. I have found they both have different strengths. I would say CM9 is a bit more stable (although both roms are very stable) but AOKP is much more customisable.
I didn't get on very well at all with any of the galaxian soup roms I tried. I had to many FCs for my liking
AOKP Build 35 is a solid rom.
I found CM9 had a better battery life.
But IMO AOKP is much more responsive and smooth
AOKP build 35. Read the latest feedback there and you'll see. I lost very little battery overnight. I made a post on that thread containing the fixed ROMs, you can't miss it.
Sent from my SGH-T959
What's wrong with rolling your own ROMs?
I build my own, and simply pull patches off CM and AOKP gerrit when they suit me.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
AOKP B 35 has been great so far. I have yet to try CM9 or Milestone 5. There are two or three more also. Anyone know the main differences? Seen one with pre packed apps etc but nothing that stands out.
StarkCity said:
AOKP B 35 has been great so far. I have yet to try CM9 or Milestone 5. There are two or three more also. Anyone know the main differences? Seen one with pre packed apps etc but nothing that stands out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
B35 is newer than Milestone 5. Also yes, there are ones with just nothing an average user cannot do. I think I will just keep downloading AOKP from the site. I will skip Build 36 since it has nothing really new and/or important.
Sent from my GT-P7310
I'm using AOSP ( aosp-galaxian.soup.gt7300-beta1.7.3), GalaxianGappsv2.1 and Apex-Launcher. All i need. Stable, smooth and less battery consumption.
gerhardat said:
I'm using AOSP ( aosp-galaxian.soup.gt7300-beta1.7.3), GalaxianGappsv2.1 and Apex-Launcher. All i need. Stable, smooth and less battery consumption.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same setup here except I use Nova Launcher. I always got weird visual artifacts with aokp and the Galaxian Soup ROMs are soother than CM9.
Which Rom
Hi,
I just go my Galaxy Tab 8.9 delivered, great little piece of kit. I am just wondering whether it is worth to update it with a custom ROM or wait until the official release of ICS which should be pretty soon.
AOKP B35 is apparently the way to go, could please somebody point out for me where it is best to download. Dr. Google returns HD2 ROM, I guess this is the wrong device ...
Good luck installing B35. I've tried several times and cannot get it to flash. If you are successful, please give me a step by step how you did it.
nirogu325 said:
B35 is newer than Milestone 5. Also yes, there are ones with just nothing an average user cannot do. I think I will just keep downloading AOKP from the site. I will skip Build 36 since it has nothing really new and/or important.
Sent from my GT-P7310
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for replying. I agree completely. 36 was fc'ing on me a bit, I went right back.
---------- Post added at 09:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:59 AM ----------
gpo1956 said:
Good luck installing B35. I've tried several times and cannot get it to flash. If you are successful, please give me a step by step how you did it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you get it figured out?
---------- Post added at 09:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:00 AM ----------
grubby23 said:
Hi,
I just go my Galaxy Tab 8.9 delivered, great little piece of kit. I am just wondering whether it is worth to update it with a custom ROM or wait until the official release of ICS which should be pretty soon.
AOKP B35 is apparently the way to go, could please somebody point out for me where it is best to download. Dr. Google returns HD2 ROM, I guess this is the wrong device ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, totally worth it. ICS for this tab is taking its sweet ass time. You won't see it roll out for awhile no matter what you read.
Well, I've tried all that I can find. Gotta say, at least for me, The aokp b35 p5wifi with motleys v3+ kernal, nova launcher and Set CPU running a few custom profiles has been an epic experience for me. Truth be told, I do see browser lag, a cache and process clear resolves quickly.
Thankfully someone listed the fixed download and it worked perfectly.
AOKP works great and is snappy for me
Build 38 running great here....
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda premium
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1602606 this build 38 is for me the best, dice player plays well. build 36 en 37 gives me troubles with diceplayer
What's up with Team Broccoli builds in goo manager? Anyone running one?
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda premium
I keep flipping between CM9 and AOKP but I'm still not sure which one I prefer of the two...
Does anyone know of the main differences?

(KERNEL) AOSP 3.0 Jelly Bean Kernel

I was searching some russian forums and i came across these two jelly bean kernels/
I am just sharing my finds here, i did nothing to help develop it, nor have i tried it.
http://narod.ru/disk/64784915001.0b09fa551aa2d9724ca8a828c2a241e1/kernel_3_cm.zip.html
http://narod.ru/disk/65150912001.4494934c3f13a85f2a90d00887422346/JB_KernelV3-0.zip.html
Google translate might help
spazzy1912 said:
I was searching some russian forums and i came across these two jelly bean kernels/
I am just sharing my finds here, i did nothing to help develop it, nor have i tried it.
http://narod.ru/disk/64784915001.0b09fa551aa2d9724ca8a828c2a241e1/kernel_3_cm.zip.html
http://narod.ru/disk/65150912001.4494934c3f13a85f2a90d00887422346/JB_KernelV3-0.zip.html
Google translate might help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have u tested them?
backing up rom now and ill try both with the unofficial cm10 and report back.
OK - tested the "V3" one so far, exactly the same as the "Unofficial CM10" kernel it seems, almost identical performance in benchmark - video recording not working, panorama glitchy but camera works fine - identical overclock settings and governors.
second one coming up now.
OK - second one doesnt boot. stuck on boot logo.
UPDATE - interesting, i switched the boot.img from the V3 kernel to the other one, and now it boots but wifi doesnt work.
ok got wifi working - gallery doesnt work with the second kernel, video and panorama same as other kernels. overclock and governors identical aswell.
overall - stick with the kernel youre on now.
(i only tested these with the Unofficial CM10 rom)
Is the first kernel working with cyanx vivo rom? Plz reply it's some one tried our
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
djbenny1 said:
backing up rom now and ill try both with the unofficial cm10 and report back.
OK - tested the "V3" one so far, exactly the same as the "Unofficial CM10" kernel it seems, almost identical performance in benchmark - video recording not working, panorama glitchy but camera works fine - identical overclock settings and governors.
second one coming up now.
OK - second one doesnt boot. stuck on boot logo.
UPDATE - interesting, i switched the boot.img from the V3 kernel to the other one, and now it boots but wifi doesnt work.
ok got wifi working - gallery doesnt work with the second kernel, video and panorama same as other kernels. overclock and governors identical aswell.
overall - stick with the kernel youre on now.
(i only tested these with the Unofficial CM10 rom)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your time and effort :3
now with these kernels, is it possible to re engineer them? or rebuild them?
Jam4l said:
have u tested them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah he tested them. If you bothered to read the op it says they both work amazingly good and oc at 15.8 ghz allowing you to microwave hot dogs to fully cooked in 3.4 seconds. Just make sure you flash a new radio and pull your battery out halfway through the installation or else it wont work!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
itsbeertimenow said:
Yeah he tested them. If you bothered to read the op it says they both work amazingly good and oc at 15.8 ghz allowing you to microwave hot dogs to fully cooked in 3.4 seconds. Just make sure you flash a new radio and pull your battery out halfway through the installation or else it wont work!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You forgot to mention you had to flash the desire HD bootloader too.
spazzy1912 said:
You forgot to mention you had to flash the desire HD bootloader too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am afraid that will brick the phone potentially
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Someone screenshot the about phone page please? I am curious to know whether this is just szeszo's or dla's kernel?
markj338 said:
I am afraid that will brick the phone potentially
Someone screenshot the about phone page please? I am curious to know whether this is just szeszo's or dla's kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL Mark.....
markj338 said:
I am afraid that will brick the phone potentially
Someone screenshot the about phone page please? I am curious to know whether this is just szeszo's or dla's kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just a small chance

[ROM][PORT][25-1-2013][4.1.2]RD MIUI v0.1 - discussion thread

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Logo by nomaj​
so here goes,
i have been trying to make a new port based on the RD miui rom, which initially worked out well, with the limits of the Custonexus rom + usb storage sharing which seems incompatible completely for now.
it has been tested , but somehow not lived up to a satisfying degree. the new base is little improved and got the fixes from custonexus rom included to support better handling and enabling/disabling in general (which of course should be perfect now)
anyways, there exists a big drawback on this alpha i will publish, which is it cannot currently use ClockWorkMod to restore to stock or another backup. and i have struggled to solve it, but unable to.
so it comes with a certain degreee of being less perfect, since you need to be experienced in using kdz recovery.
question is, how many would spend time with it, if you cannot use ClockWorkMod to restore (although most should know kdz recovery programs by now) is it worth releasing?
no problem for me..really happy to see u are the only person work hard to make custom rom for LG 4X,,,so no reason for me to buy nexus 4...thanks a lot!!
I love MiUI and I love you Dexter. But i'm affraid the 3G doesn't work in France with Custonexus, or maybe I'm a noob.
Edit : Yes I'm a noob in english too ^^
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
no problem,at least for me
Emin3ms said:
I love MiUI and I love you Dexter. But i'm affraid the 3G doesn't work in France with Custonexus, or maybe I'm a noob
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
post or read in custonexus thread on solving it with simlock, manual apn etc or ask in that thread and i provide more detail. here it is OT.
nice ,:thumbup:
no problem ,you konw I love it
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
it wouldnt be a problem for me dexter, i never restore back and always flash kdz if need to revert back to stock.
youve done quite a few projects recently which i thankyou for, top job mate
I will give it one more try
just do it
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
AW: [ROM][PORT][25-1-2013][4.1.2]RD MIUI v0.1 - discussion thread
Same here, think it's no problem to flash kdz file
just do it dex !! for 4X Community ! yeah
i started the upload, but it will take some time, so i can work on the "alpha port development" post in another thread.
Yes release it!!!
I can practically recover using KDZ while driving lol...I actually did it twice already. Flashing on the GO!
babymatteo said:
Yes release it!!!
I can practically recover using KDZ while driving lol...I actually did it twice already. Flashing on the GO!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF !! LOLOLOLOL
Be carefull, if you do it, you'll have 2 possibility
1.You can flash your device
2.You flash your own life :silly:
babymatteo said:
Yes release it!!!
I can practically recover using KDZ while driving lol...I actually did it twice already. Flashing on the GO!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use hardcore mode LOL
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
I disslike MIUI a lot, and the facts you provide dont go in its favour.
I would prefer a bug free custonexus then 3 more buged roms.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
vrmanzacky said:
WTF !! LOLOLOLOL
Be carefull, if you do it, you'll have 2 possibility
1.You can flash your device
2.You flash your own life :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. i know. But i meant, that i can do it without even looking at the phone. Flashing KDZ's is very easy...so easy even a caveman can do it.
Zhus06 said:
I would prefer a bug free custonexus then 3 more buged roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
totally agree and why i wondered. but i checked other sections and there exists worse ports than this MiUI.
but i cannot go back on a XX:1 in favour of releasing it, so here it is. Those that dislike the release, can simply skip it.
my secret agenda is that someone sits down and say i can do much better, and release a new 100% working ROM if possible
thankyou dexter once again for more great work,and in response to Zhus06 - because one has an opinion doesnt mean its favoured by everyone, gratitude should give regardless if one person likes or not
friartuckme said:
thankyou dexter once again for more great work,and in response to Zhus06 - because one has an opinion doesnt mean its favoured by everyone, gratitude should give regardless if one person likes or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a common developer excuse is simply : we got no chance of compiling a kernel with fixes.
actually in this case it would help MiUI on the vibration fix, since they expect to control vibration with parameters with an updated kernel driver we do not have a chance to fix, so its messes up somehow expecting a newer driver.
and yes, i know there exist appreciation and worth the effort trying to show o4x can actually go all the way, and better if i get my f....
(AND i just got my cm10.1 compile fully sync'd YEAH!!)

[ROM] [4.2.2] [AOKP] AOKP Jellybean for the Optimus 2X

I know what you're thinking, that I keep releasing meaningless **** that doesn't work, but this ROM is mostly working (as far as i know) and should be about as stable as regular CM10.1 nightlies (as far as I know).
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is for the old BL.
What doesn't work:
all the cm10.1 bugs (i used cm10.1 device source)
camera (idk why)
Download:
http://d-h.st/Siu
Mirror provided graciously by toshich79
GAPPS
I don't want to be "that guy", but a donation or 2 would help.
Interesting stuff!
One thing you can add to the OP which is critical information: is this for the old or new bootloader?
Keep it up!
Peace.
Good...Very Good!...
Thanks:good::fingers-crossed::good::laugh::good:.
Every ROM is good for our 2x community
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
skyjackno1 said:
"...Every ROM is good for our 2x community..."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
++++++19999999999999999999!!!...:laugh::good::good::laugh::good::good:
Downloaded!!!...I will teste in few moments...
Thanks, buddy.
EDIT: - Opppssssss! Just now I saw ... OLD BootLoader :crying::crying:..."chuiff"... ...but Thanks!!...
I'm on new Bootloader but thanks for you work
As you're writing CM10.1 bugs: Is this a port or an AOKP source build?
The reason I ask is that I wanna check something for quite some time now on a build-from-source AOKP.
(adding the p990 to vendor_aokp and referencing the P990 device tree).
Based on the about phone screenshot I'd say it is, if it's not I'll do it myself, it's no biggie.
But if it really is - could you (or anyone) please flash kk 116, OC to 1.5GhZ, run an antutu benchmark two times and post a screenshot of the detailed scores?
I need to compare some results.
Edit: oh by square toggles you probably mean the quicktoggles.
That's interesting, I ran into similiar problems when porting over some features from AOKP.
tonyp said:
As you're writing CM10.1 bugs: Is this a port or an AOKP source build?
The reason I ask is that I wanna check something for quite some time now on a build-from-source AOKP.
(adding the p990 to vendor_aokp and referencing the P990 device tree).
Based on the about phone screenshot I'd say it is, if it's not I'll do it myself, it's no biggie.
But if it really is - could you (or anyone) please flash kk 116, OC to 1.5GhZ, run an antutu benchmark two times and post a screenshot of the detailed scores?
I need to compare some results.
Edit: oh by square toggles you probably mean the quicktoggles.
That's interesting, I run into similiar problems when porting over some features from AOKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, this was a source build. I didn't really know what to call it. And yeah, ill test out the performance for you.
tonyp said:
As you're writing CM10.1 bugs: Is this a port or an AOKP source build?
The reason I ask is that I wanna check something for quite some time now on a build-from-source AOKP.
(adding the p990 to vendor_aokp and referencing the P990 device tree).
Based on the about phone screenshot I'd say it is, if it's not I'll do it myself, it's no biggie.
But if it really is - could you (or anyone) please flash kk 116, OC to 1.5GhZ, run an antutu benchmark two times and post a screenshot of the detailed scores?
I need to compare some results.
Edit: oh by square toggles you probably mean the quicktoggles.
That's interesting, I ran into similiar problems when porting over some features from AOKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go sir.
Great work... I was thinking about port aokp... Btw i want to test it
Inviato dal mio Nexus 7 con Tapatalk 2
thanks for you work... super!!!) but again the problem with the brightness bug...(the brightness is too low after unlockin))
Mate, noone thinks u release half baked meaningless s****. Every ROM is most welcome here, since people appreciate and love having the choice. Thats what Android is all about, choice
AOKP is actually pretty decent ROM, it had its bugs and quirks, but i hope they got it to a point when its able to replace my daily driver. Will test it a bit later today and report bugs if i find any
Unfortunately, the link is in error :
CPU Quota Exceeded Error.
The website that you try to access has exceed the CPU Quota Limit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A mirror link is possible ?
TIA !
link
Litderose said:
Unfortunately, the link is in error :
A mirror link is possible ?
TIA !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
link
toshich79 said:
link
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks ! Download in progress !
Feedack will come soon...
Couldnt resist to try it. Been waiting for aokp port..thanks a lot sir..oh my its for the old bl..
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk 2
JordanRulz said:
I know what you're thinking, that I keep releasing meaningless **** that doesn't work, but this ROM is mostly working (as far as i know) and should be about as stable as regular CM10.1 nightlies (as far as I know).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We never think that you release meaningless stuff that doesnt work
Even if someone is thinking that way, let me inform them that the projects you worked on earlier like B2G we very hard ones, and would have had low chances of success for majority of others too. But it was good that you tried, got to learn a lot and came out with this ROM now, looking forward to more work from you
Great!
Goodafternoon!
Thanks for your Rom!
Its working pretty good.
The memory management is some thing thats suprises me, its really good!
Thanks for you effort!!
Regards!
WyCkson
Camera fc even after wiping of data.
This was probably the best start of a thread I've ever read
Thanks for your work, cheers, heh?

[4.4.2][Rom] MIUI-v6 [MSM8960]

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(Tablet UI lol)
Overview
MIUI-v6 (It's called this in MiCode so I'm going with V6) ported to MSM8960.
Thing is it's awfully ****ed up looking due to it's tablet interface so this is going to take a little bit of work probably.
Working
-Torch
-Data (4G on boot <3 you guys)
-Mounting
-Recorder
-Music
Not working
- Launcher layout
- Dialer (Xiaomi didn't make it LOL)
- ???
WARNING
HEAVILY EXPERIMENTAL, will require a metric fkton of tweaks to become a daily driver most likely I am only posting this to show love and for observation purposes.
Download:
MIUI-v6: Alpha-0.01
PS: It's in tablet UI and prolly all ****ed up but herewegook
Will it be just for XT926 or unified - for all moto_msm8960 devices?
St.Noigel said:
Will it be just for XT926 or unified - for all moto_msm8960 devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The entire Moto_MSM tree yes
Tquetski said:
The entire Moto_MSM tree yes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for showing your continous MIUI love - I am a true fan of this and if there is anything I can help with, that doesn't require C or Java coding skills, let me know..
StefanGA said:
Thanks for showing your continous MIUI love - I am a true fan of this and if there is anything I can help with, that doesn't require C or Java coding skills, let me know..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I uploaded this, It's pretty incomplete and exists ONLY for people who are curious; this cannot be used as a daily driver; a lot hasn't been translated and the UI is totally mangled because of resolution differences.
This is only for people who are curious about the general direction MIUI is going in, it will not be pleasant or beautiful; minds will not be blown using this firmware a lot of work has to happen still
Tquetski
Hello.
This is fully functional miui5 KitKat for Nexus5 ported from MI 3
Link
Can you port miui with KitKat rom?
wmaster4g said:
Tquetski
Hello.
This is fully functional miui5 KitKat for Nexus5 ported from MI 3
Link
Can you port miui with KitKat rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm also working on V5 for 4.4 as well too but I'm going to make another topic for it; this is V6 officially even though it is rough looking
Nice!
But how did you ported that? Did you have a script or a tutorial for me to follow? Cause I want to try to port roms from the Galaxy S4 to this phone ( like the MIUI V5, I know you did a topic about but I still want to try ).
Dexcellium said:
Nice!
But how did you ported that? Did you have a script or a tutorial for me to follow? Cause I want to try to port roms from the Galaxy S4 to this phone ( like the MIUI V5, I know you did a topic about but I still want to try ).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://en.miui.com/thread-20319-1-1.html
Any fixes for this soon?
TecknoFreak said:
Any fixes for this soon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I'm currently resizing the entire UI though so maybe a few days I'll push a more complete build; the fact that this is here bodes well though because msm8960 is my phone I intend to use this for myself too
What's these base?
Klen2 said:
What's these base?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe he is using CM11 as the base.
sunkim50 said:
I believe he is using CM11 as the base.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Requirements
- KVT49L AOSP base (Pacman, OmniROM, PA all work here.. anything but CM is good)
:banghead:
Any progress to report?
Basically I don't take money for developing because I do it for me, in the spirit of that I've decided to direct all my attention onto the only device I own since doing work for other devices really does not benefit me
I would like to do work on S5 TouchWiz, Sense 6. I want to work on interesting firmware that is challenging and this has almost become an art project at this point since at a code level everything mostly works. I have to admit I wasn't really prepared for that.
So pretty much if you folks have seen any firmware of interest let me know in PM and I will try to bring it to the MSM8960 tree
In regards to this I really can't give an ETA, I'd frankly rather just work on something else
Than you for the hard work anyway. You've been trying to get this stable as new versions approach for awhile now. I don't blame you for taking a breather... I must say I have to light you up with a donation for all the time and effort from previous versions... I got you.. Thanks again
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
Tquetski said:
Basically I don't take money for developing because I do it for me, in the spirit of that I've decided to direct all my attention onto the only device I own since doing work for other devices really does not benefit me
I would like to do work on S5 TouchWiz, Sense 6. I want to work on interesting firmware that is challenging and this has almost become an art project at this point since at a code level everything mostly works. I have to admit I wasn't really prepared for that.
So pretty much if you folks have seen any firmware of interest let me know in PM and I will try to bring it to the MSM8960 tree
In regards to this I really can't give an ETA, I'd frankly rather just work on something else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any rom that uses the MIUI theme manager would be a rom worth looking at....all other theme managers are crap compared to MIUI.....
Thanks for your dedication to our device...you the man
peace
byte
dialer??
Is the dialer working on this? i would love to try a miui rom

Categories

Resources