I was just wondering if there were any way to upgrade the processor of a Wizard to a newer and faster processor, like the x-scale processors from intel?
U can only boost his speed with BatterStatus...with yhis program u can have 260 MHz...download and try it...if u want to have better processor speed just buy kaiser..processor is on the mainboard so it's gonna cost like buying a new one...
i m looking for a good gaming machine
can ne 1 of you suggest me a good processor tht would be good in graphics???
shd i go for a dual core or a single core processor?????(power consumption is NOT an issue)
n can sum1 suggest a good graphics card?????
i ll use XP as operating system
got a dualcore core2duo e6600 with 2GB and a
gf7950GT
it's pretty good for gaming
i would prob get a gf8800GT if i were to get one now though
Get a Quad Core intel procy.. and an good motherboard 680i r something similar
Get a 9600 GT or 3870X2 ..
Also get more than 2gb ram with good latency
can anyone explain betweeen the intel core duo and quad...obviously price and duo and quad....and which is better intel or AMD, also wut is the best processor under 200
i guess no one kno
better, no idea,
core duo and quad are so named because duo has 2 processors on one die, and quad has 4 on one die
i think theres not much difference between them these days,
and the best for sub 200 quid, get the highest cache, FSB and Speed you can obviously
Best Quad Under 200$ (195$): Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz LGA 775 Quad-Core Processor Model HH80562PH0568M
Best Dual Under 200$(190$): Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Wolfdale 3.0GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor Model BX80570E8400
There you go
rico002 said:
can anyone explain betweeen the intel core duo and quad...obviously price and duo and quad....and which is better intel or AMD, also wut is the best processor under 200
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
www.tomshardware.com
Try this link, there are a lot of comparisons between processors, graphic cards, ....
Mikulec said:
www.tomshardware.com
Try this link, there are a lot of comparisons between processors, graphic cards, ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...But i made it so he wouldnt have to read
zeezee said:
...But i made it so he wouldnt have to read
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, that was nice from u. But at the site u can choose benchmark and compare the performance of the CPUs (unfortunately I dont know if there is posibility to campare intel duo and quad, need to look at it).
EDIT: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/...,1225,1291,1223,1222,1289,1279,1313,1276,1311
that should do it.
coo...thnks ppl, that duo under 200 3.0 is nice i thnk ima get that one, its prolly on newegg
rico002 said:
coo...thnks ppl, that duo under 200 3.0 is nice i thnk ima get that one, its prolly on newegg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha yep - it sure is
Hello ..
Does anyone know what the difference between 1333MHz RAM and 1066MHz RAM is? what is best? and some who know about my Acer Aspire 4820 supports 1333 RAM, as these "Komputerbay 8GB (2x 4GB) DDR3 SODIMM (204 pin) 1333Mhz PC3 10600 8GB"
The Specifications on the RAM I have right now.
Memory Technology DDR3 SDRAM
Max. Memory Size 8 GB
RAM 4 GB
Memory Speed 1066 MHz
SO DIMM 204-pin
Configuration Features 2 x 2 GB
Ram 4 GB
Your Acer Aspire 4820 has Intel Core i7 620M or i5-450M Processor? if so, I doubt that it supports 1333 MHz.
Have a look here or here. Memory Types DDR3-800/1066
You can insert 1333MHz RAM card but it will down clock to 1066MHz.
Of course, more MHz = more speed but first CPU should support it.
Thank you.. But maybe I should have wrote more details about my PC.
It is a Model 4820-374G50Mnks and it only has a I3 Processor
Clock Speed 2.4 GHz
manufacturer Intel
Speed 2 to 2.9 Ghz
Type Core i3
Multi-Core 2 cores
Processornr. I3-370M
Still the same or?
Shakerz said:
Thank you.. But maybe I should have wrote more details about my PC.
It is a Model 4820-374G50Mnks and it only has a I3 Processor
Clock Speed 2.4 GHz
manufacturer Intel
Speed 2 to 2.9 Ghz
Type Core i3
Multi-Core 2 cores
Processornr. I3-370M
Still the same or?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for more details but 370M is also same in regards to RAM support. DDR3-800/1066 and upto 8GB. look here.
Thanks for your quick answers, it was really helpful
Shakerz said:
Thanks for your quick answers, it was really helpful
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad I helped you.
If you go through Toms Hardware forums, you will find lots of helpful info's. Its the best forum out there. Notebook review is also great website when you buy a new laptops.
Thanks...
Best Regards
I'll take a look at it
Edit: Campaign Link Available: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/166919191/we-want-64-bit-android-on-our-note-4-and-tab-s2-97
Hi all,
As the proud owner of a Note 4, I am a digital enthusiast looking to facilitate my life as much as possible. I expect high performance, faultless experience and plenty of organisational functionalities.
Having chosen deliberately for the Exynos-version, I am also tech savvy and willing to pay an extra buck for a machine that will do the extra mile, both in speed and distance.
You can imagine my disappointment when I figured out that the Exynos 5433-version ships with a 32-bit Android, without a 64-bit update in sight. My extra buck down the drain, stuck with a 2 year long feeling of having paid a vast sum of money for an ‘old’ device.
After having browsed the fora and blog posts, I’ve seen I’m not the only one. Realising that this is ‘only’ a matter of code, I can not help but feeling we can solve this! (Samsung, if not, then this will have been my last Samsung device).
I've launched a kickstarter campaign where I want to find 1000 users, backing the campaign with €1 for 2 goals:
1) Gather all interested Note 4 and Tab S2 9.7 owners who want a 64-bit operating system to pressure Samsung with a high amount of discontent customers to release the bootloader source code..
2) Gather money to donate to a recognised developer that can make a 64-bit bootloader, once Samsung has released the bootloader source code.
With this tread, I’d like to ask those interested to join and spread the word! Together, we can win this
You can find the project on kickstarter.com by searching with "64 bit". You'll see the "we want android 64 bit for our exynos "- project.
I am sure that together, we can win this!
Dapollez
I would count myself happy if we even get the leaked revamped tw with 6.o. But don't give up. ?
SM-N910C cihazımdan Tapatalk kullanılarak gönderildi
Might be unfair for snapdragon users, but hey, i bought my note4 for the 64bit capability. so count me in!
? Great Idea !
I m in
I must say that the respons is not what I'd epected. We won't make it this way.
Anybody any idea's on how to bring this under the attention? I would have loved to have posted in under the Exynos-development section, but I'm not allowed.
@moderator: Since timing is everything,it would be good to point people to the kickstater campaign on the first read of this post. Could you please allow me to add the link to the post (or do it yourself?) I've contacted 2 moderators, no reply yet.
In
Sure why not, I really like to have this as it will make porting easier as I think
Is 64bit even worth it ? I thought it is worth when you have at least 4gb of ram
Finally someone just said wat I feel Iam completely supporting a man for 2 yearsnow and Iam waiting For someone in xda to succeed in activating 64 bit exynos note 4 , Don't giveup .
So what will that goal achieve? the figure showing that the phone is 64bit? Does it provide tangible improvements, will the phone perform better and consume less battery. To my knowledge it will do no such thing and I can only imagine how many men hours it will take to port all the libraries, kernel, bootloader, I fail to see the benefits.
Vichenec said:
So what will that goal achieve? the figure showing that the phone is 64bit? Does it provide tangible improvements, will the phone perform better and consume less battery. To my knowledge it will do no such thing and I can only imagine how many men hours it will take to port all the libraries, kernel, bootloader, I fail to see the benefits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The discussion whether 64 bit brings extra performance or not has been held on several other places, on XDA and elsewhere. I'd like to try to keep this post about the campaign as clean as possible to enthusiast as many as possible.
We will take advantage of ARMv8 architecture, both for CPU and GPU. So there will be a performance gain. How big remains to be proven. Besides this It's a matter of principle.
Dapollez said:
The discussion whether 64 bit brings extra performance or not has been held on several other places, on XDA and elsewhere. I'd like to try to keep this post about the campaign as clean as possible to enthusiast as many as possible.
We will take advantage of ARMv8 architecture, both for CPU and GPU. So there will be a performance gain. How big remains to be proven. Besides this It's a matter of principle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure there wont be any change. You allready have advantage of armv8( it has nothing to do with 64 bit) im using s6 edge and performance difference is very minimal even with overclocked cpu. I bet there wont be even 1% performance change but ram usage will be higher around 15% percent cuz of 64 bit so i hope note 4 sticks with 32 bit.
tmac31 said:
Im pretty sure there wont be any change. You allready have advantage of armv8( it has nothing to do with 64 bit) im using s6 edge and performance difference is very minimal even with overclocked cpu. I bet there wont be even 1% performance change but ram usage will be higher around 15% percent cuz of 64 bit so i hope note 4 sticks with 32 bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what about the benchmark scores ?
& overall performance ?
Whatever it may be , I think it should be available because exynos 5433 is 64bit supported.
usmann_090 said:
Then what about the benchmark scores ?
& overall performance ?
Whatever it may be , I think it should be available because exynos 5433 is 64bit supported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which benchmark scores? Antutu has the biggest difference and its a bull**** benchmark anyway. And gpu is more powerful on 7420. Other benchmarks just about frequency difference 200 mhz overclock performance gain and its not that big for example 5433 get 1300/4600 on geekbench 7420 gets around 1500/5200. Thats all. About daily usage its just same for me i even tried it now app launchs etc almost same web pages load almost same.
tmac31 said:
Which benchmark scores? Antutu has the biggest difference and its a bull**** benchmark anyway. And gpu is more powerful on 7420. Other benchmarks just about frequency difference 200 mhz overclock performance gain and its not that big for example 5433 get 1300/4600 on geekbench 7420 gets around 1500/5200. Thats all. About daily usage its just same for me i even tried it now app launchs etc almost same web pages load almost same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah its not about oc.even if u can oc your cpu now to the same freq on 7420 the score wouldn't be the same. Cuz 7420 have diffrent CPU*architecture . and 7420 will be better because it would have the latest CPU*architecture. Soo yeah
white7561 said:
Nah its not about oc.even if u can oc your cpu now to the same freq on 7420 the score wouldn't be the same. Cuz 7420 have diffrent CPU*architecture . and 7420 will be better because it would have the latest CPU*architecture. Soo yeah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not its just same cpu architecture both cortex a57 only difference is in production 1 is 20 nm 1 is 14 nm. And it doesnt effect performance directly it just gives you a thermal space so they can overclock cpu to 2.1 ghz like in 7420 basically you cant overclock 5433 to 2.1 its just too much for it in 20 nm.
Btw we are talking about 64 bit not cpus itself. And whatever i use both of them anyway and i dont think 7420 worths anything 2015 is just waste for me imho.
tmac31 said:
Not its just same cpu architecture both cortex a57 only difference is in production 1 is 20 nm 1 is 14 nm. And it doesnt effect performance directly it just gives you a thermal space so they can overclock cpu to 2.1 ghz like in 7420 basically you cant overclock 5433 to 2.1 its just too much for it in 20 nm.
Btw we are talking about 64 bit not cpus itself. And whatever i use both of them anyway and i dont think 7420 worths anything 2015 is just waste for me imho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The revision. And btw they quietly improve things up u didnt know so yea
white7561 said:
The revision. And btw they quietly improve things up u didnt know so yea
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well peak performance doesnt effected by small differences even s810 with same cores (a57) gives same peak performance but sustainable performance can change between all of them. Again its not a soc thread im just commenting about 64 bit.
im in. I support you.
Vichenec said:
So what will that goal achieve? the figure showing that the phone is 64bit? Does it provide tangible improvements, will the phone perform better and consume less battery. To my knowledge it will do no such thing and I can only imagine how many men hours it will take to port all the libraries, kernel, bootloader, I fail to see the benefits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it matter? If people are willing to pay for it and developers are willing to do the work, I don't see any harm in it. Always better to have 64-bit support.