Database Develop

Should I swap my Desire HD with a Galaxy S?

Hello fellow XDA'ers,
I've had my Desire HD for about 10 months & although it's perfectly fine and indeed excellent, apart from the below average battery, I just got bored.
So, a friend of mine has a SGS & I am thinking of swapping with him...
1)Will I notice the RAM difference?
2)Does the pentail screen bother much?
3)How's the sense rom on the SGS?
So what are your thoughts? Did any one convert from a DHD to SGS?
Thank you.

Dont do it! I came from galaxy s to dhd......dhd feels snappier nd much better screen. Plus the sense interface on the dhd is much better than the stupid touchwiz bull**** of the sgs.....wait until u see the browser resolution as well! Horrible....wait.....did i mention samsung's kies software? Well it suckssssss......thats when it really identifies ur phone....although i lost arnd 300$ sellng the sgs nd gettng the dhd.....im not sorry i got rid of that thng

For me SGS is much better than DHD... My gs still perfect even if it is dropped while in mine DHD there are no levers of the volume because were detached.
Perhaps you'll notice that the ram is less but this minority will be satisfied by the fantastic display Super Amoled! The GS also while having 3 megapixel less than camera of dhd take best pictures and video runs much more fluid and detailed ... Just watch it on youtube... Then gs is much more customizable in terms of hacks.
So... Make your choice...

Yeah.
Sgs is a great phone. Borrow your mates for a few days and see.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

I think if you want a phone in such a range you can wait a 2-3 months as samsung is going to launch galaxy w on September 1 Berlin event it will have a 1.4 ghz single core processsor and 3.7 inch screen! If u can't wait for it thrnvuo for galaxy s as it is the best in its price range!
Sent from my sgs
kernel: galaxian
Rom: jetpack

BHuvan goyal said:
I think if you want a phone in such a range you can wait a 2-3 months as samsung is going to launch galaxy w on September 1 Berlin event it will have a 1.4 ghz single core processsor and 3.7 inch screen! If u can't wait for it thrnvuo for galaxy s as it is the best in its price range!
Sent from my sgs
kernel: galaxian
Rom: jetpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its still single-core, not much upgrade except the size and the overclocked cpu.

romdroid. said:
its still single-core, not much upgrade except the size and the overclocked cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it depends on the rest of the specs too.
on topic, I love my sgs. The kernels, roms, upgrades, mods, it's a lot of fun to learn about and make as good as possible. I wouldn't trade it for much else. Try out your friends phone and imagine how good it could be.
Sent from my GT-I9000M using XDA App

Thanks for the reply guys!
The DHD is perfect, but I just got bored and want to try something new.
And I can't buy a new phone, so I am thinking of swapping it....
Guess I'll swap, & maybe we'll re-swap in 4 months again

Galaxy s

I want to buy a new phone, and just want to ask it worth to buy galaxy s or should i go for another phone??

lopman said:
I want to buy a new phone, and just want to ask it worth to buy galaxy s or should i go for another phone??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That kind of depends on what you're looking for in a phone. I have a Galaxy S, and I'm very happy with it. However, it's now been replaced by the "Galaxy SII", which is probably considered "nicer" by most people (slightly better screen, faster dual-core CPU, etc, etc). The SII will be more expensive, so that may be a factor for you.
If you want a phone that just works, can play .mp3 files and games, and has good screen and memory as standard, then the Galaxy S will do all that and more.

Thanks for your reply.... i was more interested in is it a good phone to root and does it have many stable costum roms

lopman said:
Thanks for your reply.... i was more interested in is it a good phone to root and does it have many stable costum roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes; very easy to root; has a wide choice of custom roms; is "officially" supported by CM7; and the community is working very hard to port ICS to this phone. Also very hard to "permanently" break from a custom-rom point of view - "download mode" means almost any other problem is fixable.

I got one more question before i buy it..... which one is best galaxy s plus or galaxy s

There are a lot more ROMs out there for the SGS compared to the SGS+, although some/most (not sure about this...) will work on both phones..
I don't have any experience with the SGS+, but if you're looking for ease of rooting and ROM choice, I'd go for the standard SGS

NielsGoetschalckx said:
There are a lot more ROMs out there for the SGS compared to the SGS+, although some/most (not sure about this...) will work on both phones..
I don't have any experience with the SGS+, but if you're looking for ease of rooting and ROM choice, I'd go for the standard SGS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats true. So i would also say I9000.

galaxy s
I have an option to buy my friends galaxy s which is used for a year in good condition. The i9000 is discontinued in india for some reason, and worse phones like the galaxy s plus and lcd are introduced. I just wanna know if its worth buying the galaxy s now or should i wait for the galaxy s advance so i'm more upto date on the technology? Personally i feel the i9000 was a phone ahead of its time when it was released it still can beat any 2011 single core 1ghz phone and the sgx540 is used in the galaxy nexus too so it must be a pretty good gpu. I just need your opinion on this. Thanks

Both S and S+ are great phones.
If you prefer lots of custom roms then you can go on SGS, but if you like faster cpu (can be overclocked at 2 ghz) and stronger battery life like me, then SGS+ is obvious choice at similar price range.

But don't you think if we use the sgs+ battery in the sgs and overclock it to 1.4ghz,the hummingbird would perform better than a scorpion running at 2ghz? I'm talking about overall performance which is including the processor and gpu.

Am not sure about that.
Adreno 205 is very good gpu used also in Xperia Play for example.
Together with 2ghz processor is still better solution for me.
I found this comparision test between two gpus:
http://www.grandmax.net/2010/10/adreno-205-vs-powervr-sgx540-mobile-gpu.html

Thats an old comparison between android 2.1 and 2.2 obviously there will be a big difference, according to the latest benchmarks the gpu's rank as mali400-adreno220-sgx540-geforce-adreno205.

Can you provide a link with those latest benchmarks, i like to read it.
Thanks.

spectrum011 said:
Can you provide a link with those latest benchmarks, i like to read it.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1050968

After reading this thread my conclusion and answer to your original question remained the same.
These two phones are very similar to the overall strength and the only difference is in relation to the CPU/GPU.
However i9000 is discontinued and is more logical for me, to purchase a new model as his closest successor.

My feeling is the galaxy s if you are after adding custom roms to your phone. The community is massive. Personally I don't think the other phone will compare. Remember the S2 has actually replaced the galaxy s. I say this as the S was samsungs frontline phone at the time. All others are rehashed s phones aimed at a different market segment. If you are going to get a new phone i would go for the s2 or possible wait for s3. If you need it now i would get s
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium

Yea i think i'll go for the S itself, S2 is way too expensive, the price hasn't fallen since its launch a year back nd besides i'm gettin the s for 1/3 the price of the s2 . But any idea how much will the s advance cost? If its somewhere close to she s2 itself then there's no use of waiting for it.

NielsGoetschalckx said:
There are a lot more ROMs out there for the SGS compared to the SGS+, although some/most (not sure about this...) will work on both phones..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bcoz of such lack of education many people hard bricked their S+ , no roms from s work on s+ , it's a totally different hardware, bootloader partitions etc..
As for those who commented the gpu, according to all benchmarks there is no big difference between adreno 205 (with updated drivers) and sgx.
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium

Galaxy S2 vs Optimus 2X

Hi guys!!
I was out yesterday night with some friends and one of them had a S2, so I asked if I could test drive it.
It had stock ICS (4.0.3), versus my P990 with temasek's (almost) latest ROM and vadonka's kernel.
I have to say... other than the screen (that is a lovely 4.3" vs P990's 4") and the phone is practically the same size, so that's very cool... but other than that, I don't regret my buy one bit. The P990 feels smoother and is more responsive, navigating through menus, homescreens and even web browsing!
So all I have to say... congratulations to all dev's, and congratulations LG for putting together a very nice piece of hardware (even if the software is not up to par).

LarsPT said:
Hi guys!!
I was out yesterday night with some friends and one of them had a S2, so I asked if I could test drive it.
It had stock ICS (4.0.3), versus my P990 with temasek's (almost) latest ROM and vadonka's kernel.
I have to say... other than the screen (that is a lovely 4.3" vs P990's 4") and the phone is practically the same size, so that's very cool... but other than that, I don't regret my buy one bit. The P990 feels smoother and is more responsive, navigating through menus, homescreens and even web browsing!
So all I have to say... congratulations to all dev's, and congratulations LG for putting together a very nice piece of hardware (even if the software is not up to par).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But Samsung Galaxy S2 is still overpriced!

Be proud of your lg, no network in ireland sell any good lg devices, they think we all want iphone or sammy.
Sent from my E15 using xda app-developers app

But surely the stock s2 is way better then o2x...
Maybe s2 cm7 is better then o2x?? Anyone confirm this?? (the specs of s2 seems better)

Having used my O2X alongside my Dad's GS2, I can't think of any redeemable qualities that our phone has. The screen on the the S2 is nicer, it's bigger, it's thinner, it has better support from Samsung, it's faster. It's just better.

You just can't compare with s2 ...probably with s advance when 2x with cm7 and s advance with stock...and if with lg stock than you can compare with there galaxy ace...lg stock software is way behind

Who cares, currently the o2x is poo it need ics or jellybean all the roms or gingerbread and froyo suck.
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA Premium App

I wouldnt trade mine for s2 tho i like its bigger screen.Much better design for 2x.
Sent from my LG-P990

Dude, aren't you exaggerating a bit? Sure, stock GB sucks a*s, but Temasek's CM7, Stefan's Hybrids, TonyP's PA (and more) are fast and v stable. I am actually very happy w my o2x and as i mentioned b4 Temasek's CM7 has been a cure for my flashaholism for months now. On the subject, i couldn't comment because i haven't seen a sgs2 in action, but i suspect that it would do a bit more than the o2x due to specs.. In the end though, it all comes down to software (as all here know..)

eraldo said:
Who cares, currently the o2x is poo it need ics or jellybean all the roms or gingerbread and froyo suck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like KoolSavas said... it's not only about the android version!
I don't know what you use your phone for... but I use it to make phone call, send text messages, check facebook, check my stocks/bank account, play some poker, ocasionally surf the web and do google searches, take the ocasional picture, stuff like that...
So doesn't matter what's the android version, I want what makes my experience smoother and more enjoyable.
Having said this, I wasn't trying to say that O2X was better than the S2 in an absolute way.
I haven't compared stock O2X vs stock S2, but I do believe that stock S2 will probably fare better in that comparison.
What I did mean to say was that thanks to our dear developers my O2X can not only hold its own, but it actually looks smoother and more responsive than an S2. Of course, if someone were to put CM10 on the S2 it would probably be even better, but that wasn't my point.
And please do not forget that the price tag of an S2 is quite different from the price tag of an O2X.
That's all!

And please do not forget that the price tag of an S2 is quite different from the price tag of an O2X.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats really a VERY important factor.. While o2x price has plumbed, the sgs2 is still quite pricey considering its age. To be fair, i think that now would probably be the best time ever to buy an o2x. Right b4 the ICS update, enough time to play around with a few ROMs and hello ICS(/CM10?)

Buying an o2x would be simply more clever. In germany the price difference is between 100-115€. There is no really good reason to buy the S2. Also the o2x is with its 4'IPS more ergonomical. I would wait until ICS is released then buy the o2x, its worth the money.
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

dorwoo said:
I wouldnt trade mine for s2 tho i like its bigger screen.Much better design for 2x.
Sent from my LG-P990
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but the colors (from 3 devices i have seen) are WAY of.
All 3 had blue or green tint in color or gray scale

N3mesis said:
Buying an o2x would be simply more clever. In germany the price difference is between 100-115€. There is no really good reason to buy the S2. Also the o2x is with its 4'IPS more ergonomical. I would wait until ICS is released then buy the o2x, its worth the money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with the first part but I actually I don't agree with the last part... (about the 4" IPS)...
What impressed me the most (or maybe the only thing that impressed me) about the S2 was that, even though both phones have practically the same size, the S2 manages to have that extra .3" compared to the O2X (the O2X wastes a lot of screen space at the bottom).
So I'm pretty much convinced my next phone will have at least 4.3".

Other than the software support from Samsung, I dont think there is much difference in other areas.
But I would give up my O2X for S2 just for that quick software upgrades S2 enjoys...

Its good that you think O2x is good. But the reality is, the S2 has better hardware, its faster and it has better support. Official JB is going to land for the S2 in October.
And to the guy that posted gaming video, I raise you this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYkEUOA6Spo
Yes thats 1080p Youtube in browser, O2x has been reduced to a slide-viewer.

My friend has a s2 and it's faster but the screen looks green
Sent from my Optimus 2X using xda app-developers app

i have a friend with an s2 (stock GB) and my o2x with tony's ICS is way smoother and better looking. As much as i want to, the o2x simply isn't a better phone but the fact that we have rooted and flashed custom roms (thanks DEVs) we are able to overcome the shortages and even beat the better phone. YEY grey matter.

KoolSavas95 said:
Nobody can tell me that the s2 is better. Look how the s2 is lagging:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qAFs9OQinNo&desktop_uri=/watch?v=qAFs9OQinNo&gl=US
The 2x is great.
Sent from my monster: the LG Optimus 2x using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you cannot compare by watching a stupid youtube video and since you dont own an SII yourself you obviusly dont know the deal
I own both the O2X and the SII which I got after having gone through 4 defective O2X's - and the one I got now still doesnt work bugfree
The SII blow the O2X away in everything and Im just on stock rom for both the SII and the O2X
- it NEVER lags, it has tons better memory management and 1gb ram, meaning nomatter what I do or how long I've had my phone running, or how much I multitask, it NEVER runs out of memory and slows down or starts to lag. Its buttersmooth allways
Samsung constantly sends out updates for it, and its now running stock 4.04 ics - its bugfree, everything works perfect.
Samsung will be sending out jelly bean for it before we even get ICS for O2X
Screen is lots better - not just bigger but looks better.
Batterytime is better - I can go 2-3 days on my SII and only 1 day on the O2X with the same usage pattern
Videoplayback is lots better than O2X which cannot play high profile h264 - my SII plays every video perfect
Camera is lots better, both regular camera and videocamera
Design is better, buildquality is better
It has more internal memory 16gb vs 8gb
Sound quality when playing music is better
I mean anything you can think of comparing is just better on the SII - and the overall feel when using it and everything just works, constantly, is a blessing.
I loved my O2X when I got it, and I stuck by it for a long time before getting the SII - but Im sorry to have to say theres just no comparison at all.

I'm sorry to hear about your very bad experience with the O2X spawndk.
If I were in your situation I would most probably share your exact same opinion. (Un)fortunately, at this moment, I believe I have tweaked my O2X to the best of its capabilities.
I think you were very unlucky with your O2X's, thus your opinion is clearly biased. There are a lot of users in this forum quite happy with their O2X's, as I am, so I don't think your comparison would be true to most people.
I don't think the O2X is better than an S2, nor should it be, as they are not direct competitors (price-wise). I just think that, all things considered, an O2X is not a regrettable choice (for me, and perhaps for most people).

[Q] Samsung galaxy s advance vs. Samsung galaxy s III mini

Hi.
I'll buy new phone but I need help... Which is better?? Exactly, I mean this:
Camera
Performance
SGSadvance has Auto-brightness and SGSIIImini no. So Which is better?
Thanks for the replies

First of all. SGSA WILL get 4.2.2, secondly, the S3 Mini is just so small. I recommend the Galaxy S Advance
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium

I think S3 Mini is better! Below is a list of things that S3 Mini has but (sadly) S Advance doesn't...
- It has NFC Support.. although a variant of SGSA, the i9070P has NFC - BUT there is (almost) no "developments" for i9070P, so its not recommended for people who would want to try out Custom ROMs or Kernels...
- It has Bluetooth 4.0
- It has MORE RAM than SGSA (1024 MB vs 768 MB)
- Faster Internet/Data Speed (HSPA @ 14 mbps)
- I think it also has 4G support (HSPA+)
- It has support for microSDHC
- It does have Additional Display Support
- Its "technically" newer in market, so there is a chance that this phone might get a taste of Key Lime Pie update...
- Other Misc things.....
So yeah, Performance would surely be better in S3 mini, but both phones have the "same average" Camera or Video Recording/Playback quality....
But I'd still prefer S Advance because I hate that "curvy" shape of S3(mini).. whereas SGSA or S2 or S2 Plus has a much more BOLD shape which I prefer to hold

S Advance is a good budget phone... no doubt. But stop misdirecting the guy by telling him the S Advance is better than the S3 Mini...
With the S3 Mini you get... More RAM, stable version of JB, better camera (we're not talking megapixels here), better looks, more ROM support ( they have an almost stable CM10 ).. It's just a better phone.

panda00 said:
S Advance is a good budget phone... no doubt. But stop misdirecting the guy by telling him the S Advance is better than the S3 Mini...
With the S3 Mini you get... More RAM, stable version of JB, better camera (we're not talking megapixels here), better looks, more ROM support ( they have an almost stable CM10 ).. It's just a better phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to me it's better. I just don't like the S3 and the S3 mini. The design is ugly as hell....
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 06:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:34 AM ----------
Sami Kabir said:
I think S3 Mini is better! Below is a list of things that S3 Mini has but (sadly) S Advance doesn't...
- It has NFC Support.. although a variant of SGSA, the i9070P has NFC - BUT there is (almost) no "developments" for i9070P, so its not recommended for people who would want to try out Custom ROMs or Kernels...
- It has Bluetooth 4.0
- It has MORE RAM than SGSA (1024 MB vs 768 MB)
- Faster Internet/Data Speed (HSPA @ 14 mbps)
- I think it also has 4G support (HSPA+)
- It has support for microSDHC
- It does have Additional Display Support
- Its "technically" newer in market, so there is a chance that this phone might get a taste of Key Lime Pie update...
- Other Misc things.....
So yeah, Performance would surely be better in S3 mini, but both phones have the "same average" Camera or Video Recording/Playback quality....
But I'd still prefer S Advance because I hate that "curvy" shape of S3(mini).. whereas SGSA or S2 or S2 Plus has a much more BOLD shape which I prefer to hold
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope no 4G support just yet.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium

Jeroenvk94 said:
First of all. SGSA WILL get 4.2.2, secondly, the S3 Mini is just so small. I recommend the Galaxy S Advance
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Now, I see it sorry SGSadvance will get android 4.2.2.
Sami Kabir said:
I think S3 Mini is better! Below is a list of things that S3 Mini has but (sadly) S Advance doesn't...
- It has NFC Support.. although a variant of SGSA, the i9070P has NFC - BUT there is (almost) no "developments" for i9070P, so its not recommended for people who would want to try out Custom ROMs or Kernels...
- It has Bluetooth 4.0
- It has MORE RAM than SGSA (1024 MB vs 768 MB)
- Faster Internet/Data Speed (HSPA @ 14 mbps)
- I think it also has 4G support (HSPA+)
- It has support for microSDHC
- It does have Additional Display Support
- Its "technically" newer in market, so there is a chance that this phone might get a taste of Key Lime Pie update...
- Other Misc things.....
So yeah, Performance would surely be better in S3 mini, but both phones have the "same average" Camera or Video Recording/Playback quality....
But I'd still prefer S Advance because I hate that "curvy" shape of S3(mini).. whereas SGSA or S2 or S2 Plus has a much more BOLD shape which I prefer to hold
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
panda00 said:
S Advance is a good budget phone... no doubt. But stop misdirecting the guy by telling him the S Advance is better than the S3 Mini...
With the S3 Mini you get... More RAM, stable version of JB, better camera (we're not talking megapixels here), better looks, more ROM support ( they have an almost stable CM10 ).. It's just a better phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. So I think that SGSIIImini is better. But about android 5.0 I think that SGSIIImini won't get official update.

Sami Kabir said:
I think S3 Mini is better! Below is a list of things that S3 Mini has but (sadly) S Advance doesn't...
- It has NFC Support.. although a variant of SGSA, the i9070P has NFC - BUT there is (almost) no "developments" for i9070P, so its not recommended for people who would want to try out Custom ROMs or Kernels...-true
- It has Bluetooth 4.0-true,but not very useful
- It has MORE RAM than SGSA (1024 MB vs 768 MB)-true
- Faster Internet/Data Speed (HSPA @ 14 mbps)-SGSA has the same speed
- I think it also has 4G support (HSPA+)-no,it hasn't
- It has support for microSDHC-somebody tested micro SDXC onSGSA and it worked
- It does have Additional Display Support
- Its "technically" newer in market, so there is a chance that this phone might get a taste of Key Lime Pie update...-it will stop as s2 as ours to 4.2.2...
- Other Misc things.....
So yeah, Performance would surely be better in S3 mini, but both phones have the "same average" Camera or Video Recording/Playback quality....
But I'd still prefer S Advance because I hate that "curvy" shape of S3(mini).. whereas SGSA or S2 or S2 Plus has a much more BOLD shape which I prefer to hold
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also,for camera,S3 mini has only a vga front camera.
The only real advantage of s3 mini is the more ram which I would trade it with the ambient light sensor if you ask me...

ionescugeo9942 said:
Also,for camera,S3 mini has only a vga front camera.
The only real advantage of s3 mini is the more ram which I would trade it with the ambient light sensor if you ask me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the most important part is the ram (for multi-tasking) ambient light sensor is not that important to me.if your buying it but it does not have ''big diff'' with s advance because it has NovaThor processor too.

But you might want to look up the S2 Plus or LG Optimus L9 (great development for this device available)... I just bought an S2 Plus and got to say that it's great bang for buck as the price of the S2 Plus was just 50 bucks more than an S Advance, and the difference in features and performance is really wide.

Galaxy S or S Plus - Which to buy?

Hi guys,
So i watched a couple of videos about this device being able to run some graphic intensive games using a ROM called HellyBean or smth like that. So because im abit into gaming but not that much, which device is preferred to buy if Im into gaming. Usually, i use my phone for social networking apps and some gaming like Asphalt, Dead Space etc... Also, i rmb that the S Plus had the same hardware as my old Galaxy Wonder but its still laggy in games. SO is this phone suitable for meh? I have about 120USD/88EUR/150SGD to spend so recommend me other device D
Sent from my N150P using XDA Free mobile app

S plus you can get. Not much difference between them. S plus MSM8255T 1400MHz Qualcomm processor. Galaxy S ARM Cortex A8 processor 1000MHz. S plus = HSDPA (14.4 Mbps). Galaxy S = HSDPA (7.2 Mbps).
Sorry bad English.

S might have a better developer support. I have it running well for 4 years now. And now on Kit Kat. Cheers

s has good dev support but s plus has a bit more RAM

I would go for the plus. Running KitKat on it now. Very good.

Hmm, I watched a YouTube video about this guy who was using his Galaxy S to play really intensed games like MC4 & Asphalt 8 at full graphics. I rmb he enabled Zram and used HellyBean. Does the Galaxy S Plus also handles the same perfomance? Or isit better even without zram and that ROM?
Sent from my GT-S6500 using XDA Free mobile app

I have the "S plus" and would by it again
I have got the i9001 "plus" for several years now and i realy love it. There is a great developer community and KitKat is quite stable on it.
The only problem is the small amount of RAM but as far as i know its the same on i9000.

yea 100mb free ram on i9000

100% s plus
It has better look and material

ali_haghparast said:
100% s plus
It has better look and material
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I thought both are similar except specs differ.
Sent from my GT-S6500D using XDA Free mobile app

Surely I think Galaxy S i9000 is better!!almost always the first models are better than they come after that.

TiTAN-O-One said:
SO is this phone suitable for meh? I have about 120USD/88EUR/150SGD to spend so recommend me other device D
Sent from my N150P using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many differences betwin i9000 and i9001. On stock rom they are not actual now. On custom rom i9000 is better, i think. i9000 supported tv-out on modern custom roms, i9001 does not supporting tv-out on custom roms. i9000 have one of the finest audiochip Wolfson, it give you very good sound quality, i9001 have not Wolfson chip. With hellybean rom on i9000 you get up to 439Mb RAM, i9001 about 400Mb max. 3D performance of PowerVRSGX540(i9000) is more then Adreno205 (i9001). i9000 support usb otg host (with ext power), i9001 have not supporting usb otg.
But i recommended you look to Samsung Galaxy SII, cause it have 1Gb RAM. 512Mb ram not actual in the last modern games.

TiTAN-O-One said:
Really? I thought both are similar except specs differ.
Sent from my GT-S6500D using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry dude I think you said I9070

Pls dont buy these devices at that time there a better cheap alternatives.
From my i9000