Database Develop

cm9 ?? :/

where is cm9 ? i ony see aosp v4.0.3 :/

Huh?
CyanogenMod actually IS AOSP with, well, CyanogenMod specific additions/alterations and device specific ports.

i know but cyanogenmod is beter
aosp is base for all modS for android

So what are you trying to say n1k0? Hmm maybe you should check out CM website, because they post updates there.
One thing:
WHEN IT IS NOT RELEASE YET, IT MEANS ITS NOT READY YET.
Maybe you can tell me the vice versa?

n1kolaa said:
i know but cyanogenmod is beter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In what hindsight? Just because of the ROM Manager (over which I would prefer CWM anytime)?
If the ongoing effort to port ICS to the X8 is based on the vanilla AOSP ICS source tree I think it shouldn't make much of a difference. I can't think of any "killer feature" CM9 contains that might be amiss.
In all honesty, the devs working on the X8 port will have to cut out a whole lot of functionality to make it fit into the little RAM of the X8 and to make it somewhat usable (in terms of speed). If you look at the intended target devices / hardware recommendations of ICS the X8 (and phones having a similar hardware spec) is clearly not that suited to run it.
Anyway, I don't really care if it will be a AOSP based build or a CM9 based build as the only thing that really counts is to make it fit to the hardware of the X8 - and that's the hardest part to make everything work as neither AOSP nor CM9 contain fitting camera libs or sound libs, for a start.

Hi! I just want to know,whether the ICS ported to our phones still have DSP Manager? I love that very much...
Sent from my W8 using Tapatalk

muisc fx is like dsp manager but stil bagly :/
i trY to say ....cm Team tell use they relase cm9 verion yestrday

How do I make DSP manager run on CM9 ICS v4.0.3? I'm using nAa kernel btw.

Motorola Triumph >< Huawei X6 n friends

Hello guys
Based on my investigation several time ago,,I was look up some ROM and development for Triumph n X6 from several forums
For now,,development of Moto Triumph stepping far from Huawei X6,,I was looked some new update ROM especially ICS ROM
I want asking to someone who know about development
What different Triumph from X6?just CDMA >< GSM or more??Is Motorola have individual brand build?
Is possible to get flash ROM based from Triumph??
I'm asking because I found Triumph have AOKP ICS developers
Since edowar who develop AOSP ICS gone,,X6 device development for AOSP ICS stuck at alpha5,,
Sorry if I like blaming or flaming developers,,but I just want to know if X6 can use Triumph ROM or not
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

I don't agree with you. Triumph not stepping far from X6. Both features have the same progress, even triumph camera capturing still not work on ICS while ours already work.
Some devs... Tj and ardX still in progress for AOSP ICS for our device, we also have a step forward for camera. Zuk also available to port it, and I think he will definitely port it to any other rom for this ICS. But be patient, they're working on it. They work to make camera work perfect with video and not interfere with wifi functionality also. After that, here... will be more ICS roms port and mod... Zuk, elol and other porter will get additional spirit to port and may be me also .
X6 can use Triumph rom, but it will not get the signal and may be you can't use touch screen also. Need some touch to port it, but then the features still lack of camera. Camera is a must for me and for some of us. I can't use ICS if camera not work.

CacingKalung said:
I don't agree with you. Triumph not stepping far from X6. Both features have the same progress, even triumph camera capturing still not work on ICS while ours already work.
Some devs... Tj and ardX still in progress for AOSP ICS for our device, we also have a step forward for camera. Zuk also available to port it, and I think he will definitely port it to any other rom for this ICS. But be patient, they're working on it. They work to make camera work perfect with video and not interfere with wifi functionality also. After that, here... will be more ICS roms port and mod... Zuk, elol and other porter will get additional spirit to port and may be me also .
X6 can use Triumph rom, but it will not get the signal and may be you can't use touch screen also. Need some touch to port it, but then the features still lack of camera. Camera is a must for me and for some of us. I can't use ICS if camera not work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whatabout u8800? zuk has some roms from there as well. and u8800 has ICS based on u8860 (huawei honor).
huawei honor's chipset is MSM8255T, mi410 is MSM8255. I've posted the link to the files, but the firmware is only in .app file.. no idea how to extract or turn it into .nb0 to extract the libs and stuff..

cheezzzz said:
whatabout u8800? zuk has some roms from there as well. and u8800 has ICS based on u8860 (huawei honor).
huawei honor's chipset is MSM8255T, mi410 is MSM8255. I've posted the link to the files, but the firmware is only in .app file.. no idea how to extract or turn it into .nb0 to extract the libs and stuff..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The features here meant for hardware related with the kernel. Any port need specific kernel to those device it self, including ours. Ofcourse we can use some library from identic device hardware, but kernel drive them.

CacingKalung said:
The features here meant for hardware related with the kernel. Any port need specific kernel to those device it self, including ours. Ofcourse we can use some library from identic device hardware, but kernel drive them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so does this mean to get a working ICS rom lets say aurora ICS which is derived from U8860, we need to rebuild our kernel that will function on our devices? because kernels are device specific right?
if that's the case how do people port across different OS ie SE mini pro running eclair with an unofficial GB port? is it because the kernel remains the same?

cheezzzz said:
so does this mean to get a working ICS rom lets say aurora ICS which is derived from U8860, we need to rebuild our kernel that will function on our devices? because kernels are device specific right?
if that's the case how do people port across different OS ie SE mini pro running eclair with an unofficial GB port? is it because the kernel remains the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct me if I'm wrong....
Kernel need to build to work on specific device and specific android version, what ever kernel version is, that's so far what I know. Some drivers integrated in kernel, one of them is touch driver which related with touch panel hardware type.
To port rom from another device, we "just" pull the framework of the source rom and push it to the our android version which the framework will work. Of course with some additional "touch" to make it perfect.
To develop a rom from another device, not just port but we have to customize (made change and build from source) our device kernel to work with a destination android version. Also build from source for some libraries and drivers because of related things.
What things should be customize in kernel or libraries... well... I'm not a dev.

Owh I'm sorry mate,,actually I just looking for development team for Motorola,,they have development team focus on ICS build
Sorry if I mistake because I don't know much about this,,our device have many developers to port/make ROM and modified something
But so far I looked,,our device doesn't have development team like Triumph,,sorry if I wrong
I just want to know,how much important development team works/personal developer for ROM build
Cz I think it would be better if our device have development team
Once again mate,sorry if I wrong and asking fool
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

Arya_3RDNumber said:
Owh I'm sorry mate,,actually I just looking for development team for Motorola,,they have development team focus on ICS build
Sorry if I mistake because I don't know much about this,,our device have many developers to port/make ROM and modified something
But so far I looked,,our device doesn't have development team like Triumph,,sorry if I wrong
I just want to know,how much important development team works/personal developer for ROM build
Cz I think it would be better if our device have development team
Once again mate,sorry if I wrong and asking fool
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're not asking fool... I agree with you if it will be great if we have devs team to work and focus on ICS... but we can't push devs, since they also have their real work in real world . But what we have now are Tj and ardX are still on the path of developing ICS for our device. So for now, they are already a team.

CacingKalung said:
You're not asking fool... I agree with you if it will be great if we have devs team to work and focus on ICS... but we can't push devs, since they also have their real work in real world . But what we have now are Tj and ardX are still on the path of developing ICS for our device. So for now, they are already a team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes mate,,,absolutly great since I know some device with lower quality than our device got ICS ROM (Before using CSL,I'm Galaxy Ace user and I look at SGA forums,they have Both ICS AOSP&AOKP Build n some ICS ROM Ported)
It's mean if ICS running on our device,absolutly more perfects than the other device
Ardx said,,he still resync repo,,I also asking about this on andro-id forum
Bro Ardx was told me it's repo AOKP
It means he fully rebuild this ICS project,am I right?
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

Arya (quite Indian Name) ... there is one team, what CK mention already who is working on ICS and that is of TJ and adrX, there is another team for our device, that is of ZUK and Whyzee, they worked together for many GB ROMS . May be after getting custom kernel for ICS from Napstar and after getting ICS ROM from adrX, they can port other ICS ROM too. Even elol may team up with them.
Also we can expect MIUI ICS from CK and FR. for FCKR software they already worked together ...

vivekb said:
Arya (quite Indian Name) ... there is one team, what CK mention already who is working on ICS and that is of TJ and adrX, there is another team for our device, that is of ZUK and Whyzee, they worked together for many GB ROMS . May be after getting custom kernel for ICS from Napstar and after getting ICS ROM from adrX, they can port other ICS ROM too. Even elol may team up with them.
Also we can expect MIUI ICS from CK and FR. for FCKR software they already worked together ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes mate,,,most important is "together",,I just want to know(sorry maybe I really2 fool) how much best dev team / personal dev.
Now I know althought we haven't real dev team,at least we have people who cares with they great works to develop our device,,
Sadly I can't doing anything to develop our device,,because I have many limitation mate,,maybe next time I just can be tester
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

Could this work to port a ROM from HTC One X ?

Hope this question istn too nooby.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908008

I sure hope so, I would love to see a fully functioning sense rom
Sent from my LG-P880 using Tapatalk 2

I don't think it's as simple as that, not with a locked bootloader. Dexter has ported the one x Rom but it is far from perfect
Sent from my LG-P880

honestly the guide is crappy and miss all the hardware dependent information and what needs to be modified to match current hardware and ANY framework change to support different functions.
OneX port was quite fine, but since telephony was rubbish and HTC made their own framework to support their own driver leaving out any support for other chipset, it is very hard to fix that one. except for that, i found the port quite stable except useless since phonecalls with GSM did not work

Dexter_nlb said:
honestly the guide is crappy and miss all the hardware dependent information and what needs to be modified to match current hardware and ANY framework change to support different functions.
OneX port was quite fine, but since telephony was rubbish and HTC made their own framework to support their own driver leaving out any support for other chipset, it is very hard to fix that one. except for that, i found the port quite stable except useless since phonecalls with GSM did not work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you try making something like this for our phones? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1783260 would really help hardcore gamers like ummm ME!
Sent from my LG-P880

@non4 said:
Could you try making something like this for our phones? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1783260 would really help hardcore gamers like ummm ME!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is not related to a OneX port, it is just an app followed by a custom kernel to tweak performance, we got no kernel changes available (yet)

AW: Could this work to port a ROM from HTC One X ?
thats a pitty :/
but thanks for your answers
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

Dexter_nlb said:
this is not related to a OneX port, it is just an app followed by a custom kernel to tweak performance, we got no kernel changes available (yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Dexter what about your version of CyanogenMod 10 i see that is quite popular on OneX.
I know for the problems of other developer and official O4X version ... but life is going on...

nomaj said:
Hey Dexter what about your version of CyanogenMod 10 i see that is quite popular on OneX.
I know for the problems of other developer and official O4X version ... but life is going on...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean custonexus? or their new 4.2.x based edition? the one i use is currently not continued as i read the topic.
so my corrections are small and since kernel cannot change, we cannot do much.

Dexter_nlb said:
you mean custonexus? or their new 4.2.x based edition? the one i use is currently not continued as i read the topic.
so my corrections are small and since kernel cannot change, we cannot do much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think 4.2.x based edition

nomaj said:
i think 4.2.x based edition
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know it can work with kholk's release, since i tried the 3.0 paranoid on his, but since extSD is no good, i will wait until we get something stable with custom kernel too.. too many halfbaked roms are no fun.

[Q] CM 10.2

Hi All,
I remember that we will not be receiving next major version of Android by CM becoz of lack of NEON instructions. I only wonder, if we will still get CM 10.2 or our last version will be CM 10.1.
Can anybody with CM insider knowledge answer?
I can only see that there was not created CM10.2 branches in our P990 github related repositories, which is bad sign to me.
Edit: Answer is Yes, CM10.1 is last version.

CM 10.1 seems to be the latest official version of cyanogenmod. But just look at all the gifted developers in the development thread. I guess someone will get it working on our device .
I think even some time ago pengus or tonyp mentioned that they like the challenge ....:thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

Yes, I have read tonyp's thread and there was mentioned that CM team officially won't support 10.2 for our phone. But I hope Pengus and Tonyp will make something But it's quite possible that it will be a little bit unstable and glitchy...

p.valenta said:
Hi All,
I remember that we will not be receiving next major version of Android by CM becoz of lack of NEON instructions. I only wonder, if we will still get CM 10.2 or our last version will be CM 10.1.
Can anybody with CM insider knowledge answer?
I can only see that there was not created CM10.2 branches in our P990 github related repositories, which is bad sign to me.
Edit: Answer is Yes, CM10.1 is last version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope it isn't if you watch the developer thread you see cm10.2 only camera doesn't work yet but further it is smooth and stable i am posting this cause you may didn't see it

winstonxl2 said:
nope it isn't if you watch the developer thread you see cm10.2 only camera doesn't work yet but further it is smooth and stable i am posting this cause you may didn't see it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I know about it. But unfortunately it will not be official CM, only experimental.
It's great that there are still developers who want to keep our device up to date :fingers-crossed: , but looks like it's time to look around for next future device.

p.valenta said:
Thanks, I know about it. But unfortunately it will not be official CM, only experimental.
It's great that there are still developers who want to keep our device up to date :fingers-crossed: , but looks like it's time to look around for next future device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it isn't really experimental only the camera doesn't work and all cm10.1 bugs are included but cm10.2 is smoother and hdmi is partly fixed

🔥I would like to see more ROMs using OpenDELTA 🐙🐙

I don't know about anyone else, but I've been enjoying these CM11 nightly updates only requiring me to download and flash a 10mb-15mb file to get me to the latest nightly. ?
There is a third party app called CyanDelta and it gives us custom ROM end users an OTA-like experience. Sad thing is, this will only work on official ROMs from CyanogenMod.
OmniROM is using the Delta method as well to update their users, it's built into their ROM.
I'm not sure how difficult it would be to enable your ROM to be compatible with CyanDelta, but the developer states to contact him if you're interested.
This method saves time and bandwidth, especially for people using their limited data connection.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cyandelta

dEris said:
I don't know about anyone else, but I've been enjoying these CM11 nightly updates only requiring me to download and flash a 10mb-15mb file to get me to the latest nightly. ?
There is a third party app called CyanDelta and it gives us custom ROM end users an OTA-like experience. Sad thing is, this will only work on official ROMs from CyanogenMod.
OmniROM is using the Delta method as well to update their users, it's built into their ROM.
I'm not sure how difficult it would be to enable your ROM to be compatible with CyanDelta, but the developer states to contact him if you're interested.
This method saves time and bandwidth, especially for people using their limited data connection.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cyandelta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes No doubt it will help a lot..
I am huge fan of Omni and Purity.. Omni being in developing stage(Feature wise) I am on Puirty.. Hope @DariosF includes this awesome feature..

I've always been with this idea ever since i started flashing ROMs, and update them... having a slow connection speed is a very irritating thing when it comes to downloading gapps and ROMs. especially ROMs with OEM skins like sense and touchwiz which come in at about 600+MB
Sent from my Nexus 4

Riro Zizo said:
I've always been with this idea ever since i started flashing ROMs, and update them... having a slow connection speed is a very irritating thing when it comes to downloading gapps and ROMs. especially ROMs with OEM skins like sense and touchwiz which come in at about 600+MB
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

Glad to see more ROMs are using deltas! Finally!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[DEVICE : LTE N⁴] [ROM : CRDROID] [KERNEL : STOCK-OTG]
[LAUNCHER : NOVA] [CARRIER : T-MOBILE]
[SCREENSHOT : FEB.18.2014]
​