So I found a recent post on the HTC ONE X forums, with a new Kernel for AOSP based roms, now I'm wondering can I try and use it as is on my Ice Cold Jelly rom (o4x) or can anyone port this over to the O4X?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2154985
Is this a 2D and 3D hardware-accelerated kernel for the GPU we have on the 4x?
NightyNight said:
So I found a recent post on the HTC ONE X forums, with a new Kernel for AOSP based roms, now I'm wondering can I try and use it as is on my Ice Cold Jelly rom (o4x) or can anyone port this over to the O4X?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2154985
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, of course you can't it has HOX specific drivers, ....
a little background: tegra 4 is more less an overclocked version of tegra 3 (easy put ) so tegra 4 features are easier to backport to tegra 3, but it still is a lot of work. and yes, it should be possible to "port" it to the 4x HD, but let's see what we can do
Yeah I didn't think so lol but yeah. What's v the v difference in hox tegra and the o4x? I assume theres none really.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
NightyNight said:
Yeah I didn't think so lol but yeah. What's v the v difference in hox tegra and the o4x? I assume theres none really.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually, there's a lot
not about the processor, it's the same, but (all) the drivers
NightyNight said:
Yeah I didn't think so lol but yeah. What's v the v difference in hox tegra and the o4x? I assume theres none really.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The drivers should be difference of course...Need to be tailored once again if we want to port to fit Tegra3 of our device...
Im quite happy to test it if someone port it...:laugh:
I see, so I have been pretty far off with my assumptions lol. Nonetheless I'm looking forward to try this out once it gets ported of course.
Related
Does here any chance to get HTC ROM (Sensation/Desire S/Desire HD...) or just HTC Sense (2.1/3.0) port to our great P990?
just see a ported ROM for Nexus One, a little bit missing my old phone... /_\
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
I still have my Nexus One
mine was gone with the thief ><
Don't know if it's possible, they were able to port itbto the n1 because iy's very similar to the desire, i think.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA Premium App
I think actually its ported already. Sense 3.0 .... Look in the theme section for P990
Edit; just a theme but it looks good indeed
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
Also because there are alot of developers there compared to LGO2x
Sckank said:
I think actually its ported already. Sense 3.0 .... Look in the theme section for P990
Edit; just a theme but it looks good indeed
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but I want more than "look"...
XD
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
mixedblues said:
but I want more than "look"...
XD
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tbh mate, dont have any high hopes for this kind of port,
HTC phones tend to be very similar (nexus1 is basically a desire) so when a new version of sense comes along, its not that hard to port it to other devices.
Porting sense to a totally different device, from a different manufacturer, with different processor, just makes it too tricky. You'll notice that the Galaxy s, (which is way way more popular than our phone) doesnt have a sense port either (after just double checking this, turns out they do have one from the 2nd of june and its very buggy alot of things dont work)
So yh basically dont get your hopes up about a sense port, with devices you tend to get a modified version of your own manufactures rom, if your lucky a CM7 support, and possibly a miui rom. If the device is very popular then you might get the odd asop rom, but for example you wont get a port of the SE arc rom on our phones or anything like that.
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/10/18/android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-sdk-and-adt-14-released/
sdk is not source code
SDK = Software Development Kit, not the Source Code !
This is tool for software developers that are making apps/gamez for ICS.
i know..but devs try to make it work on SE x10
and when i got zte blade, on modaco the devs ported 2.3 from sdk
Bless, we've been stuck waiting for 2.3 for nearly half year, with no visible signs when is that gonna happen. Probably ICS in two years time.
On the matter as started above S SDK is not source code.
Sent from my LG-P970 using XDA App
ogremount said:
Bless, we've been stuck waiting for 2.3 for nearly half year, with no visible signs when is that gonna happen. Probably ICS in two years time.
On the matter as started above S SDK is not source code.
Sent from my LG-P970 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know sdk is not source code..but others can do a bootable rom from it... see x10
or zte honeycomb on android modaco...
its all from sdk...maybe with cm7 libs and kernel and so on
Don't count on it. I guess our best bet is Cyanogen. I don't think LG will do it.
It might just be me, but unless apps start requiring ICS there's no real benefit to it. It doesn't seem to do that much that can't be achieved otherwise. I actually just switched from a Gingerbread phone to a 2.2 OB and I don't miss anything. Reading about 4.0 doesn't give me the impression that existing phones will be so much better with it.
It would obviously be nice to have ICS and I would definitely flash an ICS rom to my OB.
Trekvogel said:
It might just be me, but unless apps start requiring ICS there's no real benefit to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The IceCreamSandwhich GPU Acceleration of the UI is a real benefit.
i heard that Cyanogen is doing CM8 based on ICS. I think OB is getting one too....hope so....
CalamitySir said:
i heard that Cyanogen is doing CM8 based on ICS. I think OB is getting one too....hope so....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do hope you are corect.
CM7 is nearly done by the look of it. So CM8 would be nice indeed.
Sent from my LG-P970 using XDA App
ogremount said:
I do hope you are corect.
CM7 is nearly done by the look of it. So CM8 would be nice indeed.
Sent from my LG-P970 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think there ain't a CM8... It's CM9 for ICS.
Sent from my Optimus Black using xda premium
One successful ICS port...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18607221
Sent from my Optimus Black using Tapatalk
lesp4ul said:
One successful ICS port...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18607221
Sent from my Optimus Black using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now this is good news.
Sent from my Optimus Black using xda premium
Does Optimus Black have enough internal storage for ICS? I mean Nexus S has 16gb Free while Optimus Black has only 1GB free.
BoyBawang2 said:
Does Optimus Black have enough internal storage for ICS? I mean Nexus S has 16gb Free while Optimus Black has only 1GB free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It matters not. The software itself wont eat much. That 16gb internal is for smoother operation. System not reading an SD Card which would be slow. That's why they gave it a large internal memory as possible.
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
Yup. Phone 's hardware is no problem. We have a decent processor and RAM and ROM space. So ice cream sandwich is surely to run on optimus black. Unlike other phones such as Sony, s new devic es xperia mini and pro and neo etc which have just 320mb internal memory.
Although since LG will take too many time to update we will surely need some developer 's support S soon as possible.
Don't care i'm expecting miui ice cream
Sent from my Optimus Black using Tapatalk
I don't think OB will be updated to ICS because were not even Gingerbread yet. But my hope is with Marquee because it's currently 2.3 so next update is certainly ICS then just port to our OB.
Similar to what happend to my old Samsung i780 where only its twin brother EPIX got updated to the latest version thankfully some good guys here at XDA ported it.
was just browsing xda and seen this. is it possible for a port
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737340
not sayin dat we cant but lol we're still waiting for ics and we are thinking bout jelly bean! lol but we could
FallenSuisydal said:
not sayin dat we cant but lol we're still waiting for ics and we are thinking bout jelly bean! lol but we could
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
custom jelly bean rom ;D
Don't count on it for quite a while but 4.1 would be sweet.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
itsbeertimenow said:
Don't count on it for quite a while but 4.1 would be sweet.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah there is alot to work from. might have to wait until a htc device gets it
Thrres already 78 pages on that topic as well
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium
vizzy said:
Thrres already 78 pages on that topic as well
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i know its insane ! apparently its so smooth its like iphone 4s
Ahh yeah the smoothness on my iPhone I miss sometimes lol. That's pretty much the only thing I prefer though.
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda premium
i wish we could at least get cm9 !
kensheen said:
i wish we could at least get cm9 !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
playground and ice cold are the closest to it
find a fully working version of ICS for the IncS then we'll think about JellyBean.
ICS been out since last year, only until recently we've seen some better roms on xda, i'd give it till next yr for JellyBean if anyone is still developing for the IncS then.
This might make HTC release the source faster when they realize that they are updating to an old os
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
I think it's strange we dont have an official CM9 nightlies for our phone
there's loads of unpopular **** phones that have it ...
I'm guessing we're still struggling with hacking the proprietary camera and graphics drivers in our phone. The only 99% stable ICS roms i've found are the Sense 4.0 roms (and even those FC when trying to take pictures at max res). I much prefer AOSP, but it crashes too often when using graphics intensive applications.
Bantu85 said:
I'm guessing we're still struggling with hacking the proprietary camera and graphics drivers in our phone. The only 99% stable ICS roms i've found are the Sense 4.0 roms (and even those FC when trying to take pictures at max res). I much prefer AOSP, but it crashes too often when using graphics intensive applications.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if htc release that friggen source you watch how stable our roms get :3
Bantu85 said:
I'm guessing we're still struggling with hacking the proprietary camera and graphics drivers in our phone. The only 99% stable ICS roms i've found are the Sense 4.0 roms (and even those FC when trying to take pictures at max res). I much prefer AOSP, but it crashes too often when using graphics intensive applications.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Virtious v1 is stable. I dont have any problem with it.
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Psyloid said:
I think it's strange we dont have an official CM9 nightlies for our phone
there's loads of unpopular **** phones that have it ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not weird at all, we're still waiting for 3.x kernel sources...
We = them devs.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Splux said:
Not weird at all, we're still waiting for 3.x kernel sources...
We = them devs.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung galaxy tab 1 and 2 has official CM9 and both don't have ICS sources
the 7" tab1 is gingerbread oficially, but remarkably everything works in CM9
The 10.1 inch tab 2 (GT-P7100) is honeycomb and in CM9 the camera doesn't work
So your statement seems invalid ...
Am I the only one working on this, or does anyone want to join me on IRC? Dev help only, there won't be any test files or anything to flash, so there is no use saying "Yeah I'll come in!" if you just want a file to install, I need someone who can help with making the right edits to the init files, cause after 5 versions I can't get past the bootsplash.
guys,just to be patient, we all will get it.
can any developer port sense 4.0 to galaxy ace.
some developers have started a project called sense 4.0 all they are porting sense 4 to many samsung devices, even galaxy s. so i was thinking is there somebody who coould port sense 4 to sga
Sense 4 needs ics, and ics for ace arent stable yet.
Not to mention no one had ever successfully port a full working sense rom to other device than htc's.
an0nym0us_ said:
Sense 4 needs ics, and ics for ace arent stable yet.
Not to mention no one had ever successfully port a full working sense rom to other device than htc's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention that our device will be DAMN slow if we apply Sense 4 on top of ICS.We can barely run ICS properly.
Sent from the year 3000 using a SGA where sheep's are not present.
Prawesome said:
Not to mention that our device will be DAMN slow if we apply Sense 4 on top of ICS.We can barely run ICS properly.
Sent from the year 3000 using a SGA where sheep's are not present.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why, ics runs almost perfect and we have great modded ics roms like the one with touchwiz 5
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
ACE_forever said:
Why, ics runs almost perfect and we have great modded ics roms like the one with touchwiz 5
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The fact is...Even though ICS runs nicely,it does use a LOT of resources..So,Sense4+ICS=Devastation of Ace
Prawesome said:
The fact is...Even though ICS runs nicely,it does use a LOT of resources..So,Sense4+ICS=Devastation of Ace
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
still, it would be interesting to see
I believe there's something called self-service .
"I have to go. It's just....they really need me." - Sora
diegonnc said:
still, it would be interesting to see
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.There is nothing interesting in it
2.There is no point in working your ass off just to "see" if it works..
3.Perfomance would be low,there is nothing to be sure about it..
4.We haven't even managed to get a properly working Sense(earlier version) which was based on GB,no point in trying this..
This is a topic that discusses the possibility and pros/con's of having a gingerbread rom on our desire c.
Personally I think that gingerbread is like CLASSIC android, and 4.0+ is More MODERN android.
I have absolutely no experience in building Roms so I ask the developers here to maybe try to build something more old fashioned
I am willing to test any and every ROM made.
What do you guys think?
I feel that we have run out of Roms to build in android Jelly bean so why not try something old but fresh!
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
What do I think?
No.
Absolutely no point, like at all.
Then we could run Java Emulator
brnt said:
What do I think?
No.
Absolutely no point, like at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-_- ............ Come on now brnt........... Don't be like that...... You KNOW you want it.
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
also if we get gb then we get chainfire support back on board meaning raising d gfx quotient of games esp nfs mw. If we can get some dev support then it can be pulled off
if you want cm7 i can probably help after i make ubuntu partiton on my new computer
Firefox OS would be a better ROM.
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
TheRedHunter said:
Firefox OS would be a better ROM.
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeepp right!!
brnt said:
What do I think?
No.
Absolutely no point, like at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I came to post exactly this. Oh well.
+1
for811 said:
if you want cm7 i can probably help after i make ubuntu partiton on my new computer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks that would be awesome!!! And to all the haters (me, and brnt) not everyone likes the way android 4.0+ looks. I personally like it but I like 2.3 better...
Pros / Cons of gingerbread:
Pros:
- better menu look
- faster performance on our hardware
- less bulky than jelly bean (animations, apps, etc)
- more classic of android
- AWESOME 3D GALLERY
- Officially supported hardware
Cons:
- less smooth as jellybean
- less app support
- less RAM management
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
Pros / Con's of Cyanogenmod 7 (not the stock GB features)
Pros:
-more customization than cm10
-(currently) more themes than cm10
Con's:
-less "spin offs" (Provision, Etc.)
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
Why would you downgrade a device to software that is 2 years old? If you wanted to get 2.3 buy a wildfire S... The main selling point of this device was at the time it was a very cheap and good quality handset running the latest version of android which was 4.0! And gingerbread was old and looked outdated compared to modern day Android (entirely opinion though)
The points you made with stock gingerbread were mostly opinion, and about the jelly bean being bloated (which I agree with) remember that the HTC Desire C came with stock ICS which was smooth when coupled with sense. And I think someone can port the "AWESOME 3D GALLERY" if it hasn't been done already.
It would be great to see it happen, but what's the point?
Sent from a park
If you want GB ( Not CM7 ), you can port stock rom from HTC Explorer. Desire C and Explorer have same chipset, so the ROM will boot and function out of box. Only, BT and WiFi wont work at first. You can fix that later.
cute_prince said:
If you want GB ( Not CM7 ), you can port stock rom from HTC Explorer. Desire C and Explorer have same chipset, so the ROM will boot and function out of box. Only, BT and WiFi wont work at first. You can fix that later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would do this if I knew the slightest bit about porting ROMs! I guess I'm just waiting for a dev here to have the same opinion as me and make/port a ROM to desire c...
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
Guys I really appreciate your opinions on the topic. Lol, from the start of the development of this phone I wanted a GB look. You may laugh at me for buying a phone that never had or will get GB but the only phone that was availible to me to get GB (my carrier) was the Samsung galaxy Q, and that thing is really bad + it runs 2.2 not 2.3 and 2.2s status bar is ugly (my opinion). So is there any devas that wish to help me out a little?
Thanks for reading!!
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
Guys having ubuntu prblem. If could.fix would defenatly help u
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
uchihasparky said:
Guys I really appreciate your opinions on the topic. Lol, from the start of the development of this phone I wanted a GB look. You may laugh at me for buying a phone that never had or will get GB but the only phone that was availible to me to get GB (my carrier) was the Samsung galaxy Q, and that thing is really bad + it runs 2.2 not 2.3 and 2.2s status bar is ugly (my opinion). So is there any devas that wish to help me out a little?
Thanks for reading!!
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I like your idea of having something classical. And no I am not a hater, I'm just stating an opinion.
That is why its a [Discussion]. What I recommend you doing is to learn how to do stuff on your own and not rely on others.
I was curious about kernels, so I learned. I mean it shouldn't be that hard to follow a guide.
About GB
me too ... i wish theres a GB/CM7 roms here... .. .but it is more smooth if it is a plain GB (doesnt have a Sense) ... and also about the kernel?? what kernel we should flash?
That would be awesome. Oh the days f gingerbread
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium
addictz10 said:
me too ... i wish theres a GB/CM7 roms here... .. .but it is more smooth if it is a plain GB (doesnt have a Sense) ... and also about the kernel?? what kernel we should flash?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should use kernel 2.6.x for GB. For that you need to port Explorer's 2.6.x stock kernel source to Desire C, just like we ported 3.0.x kernel for Explorer from Desire C.