First of all, a million thanks for developers who are still working on this great device!
I have been using unofficial CyanogenMod 10.1 for vivo by dla5244. Haven't looked for anything else for quite some time, but now I am thinking of changing it. Could someone suggest any other no-Sense ROM? I need -
- Better or similar battery life
- Faster application launch
- More stability (less bug)
- and JellyBean at least
Thanks in advance...
Try CM 10.2 by szezso recently updated check the last page.
Or try CM 10.1 again by szezso with latest kernel on last page.
And the best ROM is again by szezso which CM10.
I would say try all of these and choose according to your use. But my vote goes to CM10 by szezso.
And I have tried all the ROMS available for this device
Iqbal Ansari said:
Try CM 10.2 by szezso recently updated check the last page.
Or try CM 10.1 again by szezso with latest kernel on last page.
And the best ROM is again by szezso which CM10.
I would say try all of these and choose according to your use. But my vote goes to CM10 by szezso.
And I have tried all the ROMS available for this device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot, Iqbal. Unfortunately, the problem is I don't have enough time and patience to try out all ROMs along with apps I use.
Could you tell me which of them gave you the best battery life, and also with which kernel?
What improvement I can expect with me coming from unofficial CM10.1 by dla5244?
Also, which kernel do you recommend with CM10 szezso especially?
Thank you once again!
ddsam said:
Thanks a lot, Iqbal. Unfortunately, the problem is I don't have enough time and patience to try out all ROMs along with apps I use.
Could you tell me which of them gave you the best battery life, and also with which kernel?
What improvement I can expect with me coming from unofficial CM10.1 by dla5244?
Also, which kernel do you recommend with CM10 szezso especially?
Thank you once again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already said CM10 is best.
CM10 by szezso with his latest kernel link: http://d-h.st/n9T
It has best battery life among all the kernels. The kernel is for CM10.1 but will work with all CM versions.
I use [ROM][CM11][4.4.1][KOT49E]VivoKat[Source-built][PMEM][BETA #5][12/12/2013]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2519414
egorlins said:
I use [ROM][CM11][4.4.1][KOT49E]VivoKat[Source-built][PMEM][BETA #5][12/12/2013]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2519414
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
072665995 said:
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But no deepsleep ---> lots of battery drain
Also beta#6 for Vivokat, SMS is broken but Szeszo says he will fix it for Beta #7
072665995 said:
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
couldn't agree more with this..
guys, suggest a stable build instead. Others might not be as adventurous as us who always eagerly to try out the latest release.
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest kernel can be used in any of those cm Roms. Same source is used for all kernels
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In engineering it's called a trade-off, in this case performance for battery life. Granted that there are a few bugs which, once fixed, will improve the situation but for know I guess that's the compromise you have to make (and hope that the developer can fix the bugs soon )
072665995 said:
But no deepsleep ---> lots of battery drain
Also beta#6 for Vivokat, SMS is broken but Szeszo says he will fix it for Beta #7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in beta6 sms is broken, but after intalled update sms still work fine, but update is with some bugs, maybe only my ics have that problems, but when i dongradet from beta7 to beta6 and sms still works
Szezso's Vivokat 4.3.1
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
sujeetpatwa said:
Szezso's Vivokat 4.3.1
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're not making sense.
Vivokat is 4.4.2
and CyanVivo10.2 is running 10.3
Thanks for this thread, in terms of sense Roms what do you recommend?
I remember when I had this phone with sense3.5, nik 's Roms where the best. Then Android 4 came and after a while I gave the phone to my father. It is running arhd 6.0 but I find it a little sluggish. Any faster ROM that won't have bugs (since the phone is not mine I can't test them all) .
Just out of curiosity what version of Cm by Szezso Roms do you think it's the best,the one with 4.1.2, 4.2.2 or 4.3.1?I think 4.4.2 maybe with some problems right?
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Sense ROM's. ~ Try SVHD,
Szezso ROM ~ try CM10 (4.1)
Sent from my HTC Incredible S
I use Viper Vivo 2.5.3 Sense Rom and no sense Lacoste mod 4.2.2, it's clean, fast and stable.
Wysłane z mojego HTC Incredible S przy użyciu Tapatalka
Suggest a rom with best battery performance. I m currently using sense rom svhd n new battery (just two days old). N my battery backup is not that good as u can see it below
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Related
Nightlies just started officially dropping the other day, so I'm curious what you guys have thought thus far.
Found here: http://get.cm/?device=quincyatt
I'm on a stock ICS build, so I think I have to flash a GB ROM and then flash CM from there. Which is fine; just curious
starkruzr said:
Nightlies just started officially dropping the other day, so I'm curious what you guys have thought thus far.
Found here: http://get.cm/?device=quincyatt
I'm on a stock ICS build, so I think I have to flash a GB ROM and then flash CM from there. Which is fine; just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Going by cm based roms as of june, it's very stable, definitely stable enough for daily driver. Issues as of june, shorter battery, possible GPS issues, blue tooth a2dp stable connection.
I'd definitely give it a try and thanks for the heads up.
And yes, you need to flash from GB kernel with Root and cwm afaik.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Its very stable rom I am currently using it
U should give it a try
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Using PA based on CM9 from the time it came out. No problems at all. Amazing ROM!
Sent from my Galaxy Note running ParanoidAndroid v0.4 using XDA Premium xD
sujal said:
Using PA based on CM9 from the time it came out. No problems at all. Amazing ROM!
Sent from my Galaxy Note running ParanoidAndroid v0.4 using XDA Premium xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1+ I concur, even though I didn't get on-board with paranoid android rom until version 04 was released but it is an EXCELLENT rom! Maybe the PA team should get together with Samsung on making this rom preinstalled software for the next generation of galaxy note.
Never gonna happen
Are the battery issues mitigated from what they were?
starkruzr said:
Are the battery issues mitigated from what they were?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on my device (ymmv!), after the basic tweaks (disabling unnecessary apps, syncs etc.), the standby battery life was not worse than on stock GB or ICS. During normal usage, esp. while browsing on wifi it was much better - the estimated current consumption on CM9 was at ca. 500mA on new ICS 4.0.4 its closer to 750mA in the same conditions.
Greetings!
My friend asked me if I could speed up his incredible S, and I told him that I could try and install a new rom on it.
However, I don´t know a thing about Incredible S roms. I am looking for a stable and fast rom, he is an android noob
so it has to have little to no bugs. Also ICS or JB would be good.
I don´t know if MIUI is available for this phone, but if so, is it fast and bug free? How about AOKP or CM9/10?
Which roms would you guys recommend, I´d like to try some non-sense
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app
MIUI works great on this For AOKP I would try IceCold. CM9/CM10 are still full of bugs here but if you want you can have a look at them also. I would recommend CodeNameAndroid, as it has got the coolest tweaks
I'd recommend you to give Paranoid Android a try.
Except for some kernel related stuff, there are no major issues, and yes - it is responsive. And with some undervolting I get really good battery life out of it as well, even though I overclock.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1863862
*edit*
"little to no bugs"
Well, CyanogenMod 7, MIUI or Sense-ROM's seems to be your options in that case.
Pretty much every AOSP/AOKP ROM with ICS/JB will have the same bugs since the current kernels that are used for them are hacked to work... so if he doesn't want any bugs he should stay away from ICS/JB ROM's that are AOSP/AOKP - for now at least, but if it doesn't matter that much if some stuff isn't working properly and so on: go for Paranoid Android or Codename android.
WILLI120 said:
MIUI works great on this For AOKP I would try IceCold. CM9/CM10 are still full of bugs here but if you want you can have a look at them also. I would recommend CodeNameAndroid, as it has got the coolest tweaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about the Venom ViperVIVO?
As I remember, you and markj talked about it once or twice.
The least buggy rom I use has to be IceColdSandwich
thuanle said:
How about the Venom ViperVIVO?
As I remember, you and markj talked about it once or twice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ViperVIVO is not out for public yet, still beta's.
But from what I've heard, it seems to be worth a try when it is released
thuanle said:
How about the Venom ViperVIVO?
As I remember, you and markj talked about it once or twice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, it's a Sense ROM And it's not out for public yet but I tried it and if everything works, it's gonna be awesome as candy!
Is the MIUI rom functional and without bugs? MMS and all that shizzle working? Which version is the best, and is it 2.3 or 4.0?
Is MIUI completely bug free? Is it 2.3 or ICS that it is built on?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
Sebz4n said:
Is MIUI completely bug free? Is it 2.3 or ICS that it is built on?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miui gingerbread was based off CM7 so it didn't have many problems
Miui ICS is based off HTC's ICS ruu so there are not many problems either. Some problems from the chinese miui release were fixed by spongychicken. His rom is in the dev section, have a look
Codename android has my vote. It is a great JB ROM. however, it does have a few bugs.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Hello friends ,
As per your opinion which is the best rom for I9000
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Slim Bean, hands-down
swapk007 said:
Hello friends ,
As per your opinion which is the best rom for I9000
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to have stock Gingerbread on my SGS I9000. Then I switched to DarkyROM ICS, which was okay. After a while I came across the SlimRoms website, which was still developing Slim ICS at the time, so I flashed ICS, which was brilliant. Shortly after the Slim team started working on SlimBean, and after reaching a stable version I tried it for myself, a decision I am glad I made.
SlimBean is by far the lightest, fastest ROM I've used so far. Give it a try for yourself and you'll see how amazing, lag-free it is. I'm using version 3.1 with the Semaphore kernel version 2.6.2s.
Hi,
I've flashed many roms on my i9000 : Miui, cyanogen 7, Cyanogen 9, Jelly Bean, ICs..... but for me the best one is the JW8 SAUROM.
Stable, fast, GS3 Theme and a very good battery life !!
Since i am on this rom i don't want to flash another one !
Slim 3.1 with semaphore 2.6
If someone help me i definitely HIT THANKS....
Your question must be more specific, and I'll try to explain...
In my opininon the are only 2 developers team which should be considered, first CyanogeneMod which leads because of it's bigger number of devs (so more supported devices). 2nd is AOKP, which I personally prefer because it's more designale and more good looking, but also very stable. I've tested hardly both, but 5th build from AOKP has best battery life, so I'm never going back to CM, only for new tests, making new statistics etc.
Hope I helped, greetings
swapk007 said:
Hello friends ,
As per your opinion which is the best rom for I9000
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
niggabyte said:
I used to have stock Gingerbread on my SGS I9000. Then I switched to DarkyROM ICS, which was okay. After a while I came across the SlimRoms website, which was still developing Slim ICS at the time, so I flashed ICS, which was brilliant. Shortly after the Slim team started working on SlimBean, and after reaching a stable version I tried it for myself, a decision I am glad I made.
SlimBean is by far the lightest, fastest ROM I've used so far. Give it a try for yourself and you'll see how amazing, lag-free it is. I'm using version 3.1 with the Semaphore kernel version 2.6.2s.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
phiphi374 said:
Hi,
I've flashed many roms on my i9000 : Miui, cyanogen 7, Cyanogen 9, Jelly Bean, ICs..... but for me the best one is the JW8 SAUROM.
Stable, fast, GS3 Theme and a very good battery life !!
Since i am on this rom i don't want to flash another one !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1Ishara said:
Slim 3.1 with semaphore 2.6
If someone help me i definitely HIT THANKS....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
roscatel said:
Your question must be more specific, and I'll try to explain...
In my opininon the are only 2 developers team which should be considered, first CyanogeneMod which leads because of it's bigger number of devs (so more supported devices). 2nd is AOKP, which I personally prefer because it's more designale and more good looking, but also very stable. I've tested hardly both, but 5th build from AOKP has best battery life, so I'm never going back to CM, only for new tests, making new statistics etc.
Hope I helped, greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank u all for the respons i will definately flash and check the above said roms...
swapk007 said:
thank u all for the respons i will definately flash and check the above said roms...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please hit thanks button no need to write thanks
If someone help me i definitely HIT THANKS....
There is no BEST, but Paranoid Android is preety cool
Do it to it
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
1Ishara said:
Slim 3.1 with semaphore 2.6
If someone help me i definitely HIT THANKS....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But not alll stock rom 2.3.x can be flash with semaphore.. and not all i9000 can be flash with the same s/rom. But still semaphore 2.7.4 is the best way to get cwm. If flashi v semaphore causing boot failure, try to flash with other s/rom and re-flash semaphore.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
MintiIceCream said:
There is no BEST
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 ^^
I was on Hellybean (4.1.2) before I switch to beast rom (4.2.1).
It was pretty nice but the best rom it's up to you, try several rom
roscatel said:
Your question must be more specific, and I'll try to explain...
In my opininon the are only 2 developers team which should be considered, first CyanogeneMod which leads because of it's bigger number of devs (so more supported devices). 2nd is AOKP, which I personally prefer because it's more designale and more good looking, but also very stable. I've tested hardly both, but 5th build from AOKP has best battery life, so I'm never going back to CM, only for new tests, making new statistics etc.
Hope I helped, greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which AOKP ? (link)
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
roscatel said:
Your question must be more specific, and I'll try to explain...
In my opininon the are only 2 developers team which should be considered, first CyanogeneMod which leads because of it's bigger number of devs (so more supported devices). 2nd is AOKP, which I personally prefer because it's more designale and more good looking, but also very stable. I've tested hardly both, but 5th build from AOKP has best battery life, so I'm never going back to CM, only for new tests, making new statistics etc.
Hope I helped, greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The idea of two developers was what I was thinking as well when I was making a decision either to stay on stock 2.3.6 or flash something new. CM9 is more "readable" for me in terms of numbering and Stable/Nightly/Experimental. Even tough I do not understand how come there is a stable version followed by nightly builds.
When watching some videos and screens of AOKP I felt it might be even better but I got confused in the numbering (which of the builds is the most stable as I need a working phone not a phone to be flashed twice a week).
For me the best ROM is SlimBean with Semaphore Kernel!:good:
Try latest androslim (JB 4.2.1)... its very smooth, responsive and very stable...
vigneshnallamad said:
Try latest androslim (JB 4.2.1)... its very smooth, responsive and very stable...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for noob question as im new in android os.. Was Androslim same or some sort based on slim rom?? Thanks in advanced
---------- Post added at 03:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:46 AM ----------
SeeDoubleYous said:
For me the best ROM is SlimBean with Semaphore Kernel!:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree!! As i also using it for my n7000 and i9000.. But i9003(my wife phone) always have prob with custom build rom....
I have flashed with slim rom 3.1
but when i do factory reset the phone goes in boot loops..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
C-Rom Mix V9 here - it's a near perfect ROM. Stable, everything is where it supposed to be. Very smooth operating. My last phone - XPERIA ARC S was destroyed (and its hardware is superior to that of i9000) - Galaxy - being slower by half is faster when speaking about this system operation. There are some hiccups with number recognition sometimes (like 1/10 phone calls and only till i pick up - so no showstopper for sure ). The camera is limited to just basic functions - but is working perfectly fine. The calendar is more basic than in ICS modded ROM for ARC S. The battery last for a day or less - but here i cannot say if the battery in my phone is just old or is this ROM (i got the phone used and the battery is 2,5 yo). And these are my only complaints - not much I have MUUUUUUUCH more complaints on every other stock/modded rom for Galaxy & ARC S
It's my daily ROM more than a week now.
kisses
There is no best but paranoid Android is so cool rom.
Sorry if the is some mistakes,but I'm trying out my new day typing touch pal keyboard. It's magnificent you guys try it out, it's free. Haha I wrote this message in about a minute lol.
Jelly Bean
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
guys try out AOKP milestone 1.
i think it is stable for me till now.
Slim-galaxysmtd-4.3.build.2.2-OFFICIAL-1768
is this build stable ? how about battery ? and bugs ?
am compete noob ,,,
thanks in advance ,,
sorry for spamming
Faiyaz5yaz said:
Slim-galaxysmtd-4.3.build.2.2-OFFICIAL-1768
is this build stable ? how about battery ? and bugs ?
am compete noob ,,,
thanks in advance ,,
sorry for spamming
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of course it's stable, but there are some bad parts about jellybean. first, the battery life isn't that great, and secondly, the ram management is awful (after installing facebook and whatsapp, as an example, you will only have about 40-50 mb free ram). i would recommend you to flash CyanAOSP v2.9.0 4.4.2 kitkat + semaphore kernel. it has great battery life, it's blazing fast, and the ram management is perfect (about 160mb free ram with facebook and whatsapp installed).
OK now since you talking about stability. SlimROMS are quite stable but there are better ROMs than slim ROMs such as Supernexus which I am currently using and seriously I haven't received a single bug. I am on KitKat version. Others are Mackay ROM, cyanogen mod latest nightly build, or cyanaosp which is good too. Even 4.3 was quite buggy.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
thanks for the responses!!
TeKnoGin said:
OK now since you talking about stability. SlimROMS are quite stable but there are better ROMs than slim ROMs such as Supernexus which I am currently using and seriously I haven't received a single bug. I am on KitKat version. Others are Mackay ROM, cyanogen mod latest nightly build, or cyanaosp which is good too. Even 4.3 was quite buggy.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the responses..
i installed official cm 10.2.1.. and its working fine..
Cyangenmod
Faiyaz5yaz said:
thanks for the responses..
i installed official cm 10.2.1.. and its working fine..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used CM 10.2 and now using CM 11 and they both work fine , though I only use it on WiFi not cell service so can't comment on that. The CM 11 is still being developed so might be a few bugs here and there.
waiting
platypoid said:
I have used CM 10.2 and now using CM 11 and they both work fine , though I only use it on WiFi not cell service so can't comment on that. The CM 11 is still being developed so might be a few bugs here and there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea. waiting for stable release
Hello,
I´ve been thinking about that: Which one is better: Ressurection or NightOwn? And why?
I did a try and both seems like same! (same bugs, same layout - material design, etc...)
Maybe LL Roms could make custom roms a little bit hard to do core/visual changes, or it is just a my mistake?
You should try it first , then you can compare which is better ! Btw i prefer using nightowl for battery life [emoji106]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mtmello said:
Hello,
I´ve been thinking about that: Which one is better: Ressurection or NightOwn? And why?
I did a try and both seems like same! (same bugs, same layout - material design, etc...)
Maybe LL Roms could make custom roms a little bit hard to do core/visual changes, or it is just a my mistake?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same confusion! What bugs did you face?
They have similar issues. In latest versions there are proximity sensor issues during call, also users complain about 1080p recording not working, overheating, battery drain, etc. All bugs and solutions are in the original threads. You guys should try both of them and compare. It all depends of what you expect. Both are beta versions so bugs are expected. I have used both and I like Bauner's version a bit more, for no specific reason. I had to return to more stable rom, because I'm currently using N7000 as main phone and I need it to be stable as much is possible.
i tried both and smilar. but nightowl better battery life and smoothness. but you must try and see which one.
super_operater said:
I had to return to more stable rom, because I'm currently using N7000 as main phone and I need it to be stable as much is possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
/OT What rom did you return to? Tx
backstreetboy said:
/OT What rom did you return to? Tx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently I'm on SlimKat (4.4.4), after using NightOwl beta 9.0.1. Still facing some bugs on Lollipop roms and I find this one quite stable for now.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Free mobile app
I sugest you go and get lanchon's kernel with the trimfix and the FP bug fix, it's the only truly stable kernel avaliable for the n7000.
Aldo, it supots trim, that helps a lot with the phone's responsiveness
blackomegatm said:
I sugest you go and get lanchon's kernel with the trimfix and the FP bug fix, it's the only truly stable kernel avaliable for the n7000.
Aldo, it supots trim, that helps a lot with the phone's responsiveness
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used B9.0.1 from the beginning no one reboot yet.. very stable, good battery drain.
I was try NightOwl 12.1 beta2, a little lag, now i flash Ressurection with Nightowl 12.1 kernel and gapps in nightowl 12.1 now my note running smooth, i will test battery life!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk