Related
I've been using Codename ever since it came out but I got tired of the problems related to the Kernel and switched to ProjectX. I and I'm sure others really want to use a smooth and working JB ROM.
Is there anyone working on the 3.0 Kernel for our device? I know Nik said he contacted someone to help us out but there's been no news on that front yet.
If anyone knows how to modify Kernels, Adi_pat gave some tips here -
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=33291894
He'll probably help us out if we make some progress in booting up Codename with it at least
TheDareDevil said:
I've been using Codename ever since it came out but I got tired of the problems related to the Kernel and switched to ProjectX. I and I'm sure others really want to use a smooth and working JB ROM.
Is there anyone working on the 3.0 Kernel for our device? I know Nik said he contacted someone to help us out but there's been no news on that front yet.
If anyone knows how to modify Kernels, Adi_pat gave some tips here - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1899335&page=38
He'll probably help us out if we make some progress in booting up Codename with it at least
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Upon the exit of JB roms ago, were used GB modified kernel, now with source code maybe will be possible to compile a fully working kernel, but afaik there are no 3.x kernel for JB, maybe someone is working out of xda on irc channel but don't known..
Sadly I do not have much competence, plus I don't have the phone it's to repair....
There is kernel 3 for incredible 2 and desire s..may be someone can port it..
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
I might be crazy, but I remember reading a post not too long ago about a dev that was writing the 3.0 kernel from source for our phones. I haven't heard an update since then, but I remember hearing it was someone with relation to the cm9 team. It sounded promising, but that development was very slow.
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
TheMegosh said:
I might be crazy, but I remember reading a post not too long ago about a dev that was writing the 3.0 kernel from source for our phones. I haven't heard an update since then, but I remember hearing it was someone with relation to the cm9 team. It sounded promising, but that development was very slow.
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Off the top of my head I seem to recall Noverbose saying he was trying to write a 3.0 Kernel. I also remember at least one other person mentioning something similar to, so there are people working on this. From what I understand it's not easy - I doubt we'll see anything this side of Christmas tbh. I hadn't realised that the Inc 2 and DS had a 3.0 Kernel though. Anyone know if they are actually a made from source version, rather than the same hacked version that we have in Codename, for example?
Well tbh honest a working GB kernel would do too.
Like the front camera and chrome and screen flickering etc.
Damn I wish kaijura was here
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
CyanideJack said:
Off the top of my head I seem to recall Noverbose saying he was trying to write a 3.0 Kernel. I also remember at least one other person mentioning something similar to, so there are people working on this. From what I understand it's not easy - I doubt we'll see anything this side of Christmas tbh. I hadn't realised that the Inc 2 and DS had a 3.0 Kernel though. Anyone know if they are actually a made from source version, rather than the same hacked version that we have in Codename, for example?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes those 3.0 kernels are compiled from source. I checked out AOSP ROM threads in the Desire S and Inc 2 section that had 3.0 kernel, then looked up the creator of the ROM on github and found the sources. I was going to try tackle the 3.0 kernel to get a hang of the make system before building CM9, but I don't have enough monthly data left to download the kernel toolchain! Nov 1st is close, so I can get to work soon! :highfive:
The best way to build an AOSP 3.0 kernel for our device would probably be to look at the source code for 3.0 kernels on our sister devices, and figure it out from there.
ZaySk said:
Yes those 3.0 kernels are compiled from source. I checked out AOSP ROM threads in the Desire S and Inc 2 section that had 3.0 kernel, then looked up the creator of the ROM on github and found the sources. I was going to try tackle the 3.0 kernel to get a hang of the make system before building CM9, but I don't have enough monthly data left to download the kernel toolchain! Nov 1st is close, so I can get to work soon! :highfive:
The best way to build an AOSP 3.0 kernel for our device would probably be to look at the source code for 3.0 kernels on our sister devices, and figure it out from there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well holy crap, dude, get on that! Seriously though, getting a working 3.0 kernel for our device would go a long way to making JB a usable ROM for our device. Would it be possible to port JellyTime or a similar JB ROM to our device as well?
The source doesn't need changing, it is the ramdisk that is the problem. I have been trying to get help, but so far no luck, adi_pat said he would take a look, but it is hard for me to test as I no longer have an inc s
CyanideJack said:
Well holy crap, dude, get on that! Seriously though, getting a working 3.0 kernel for our device would go a long way to making JB a usable ROM for our device. Would it be possible to port JellyTime or a similar JB ROM to our device as well?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm gonna worry mainly about compiling CM9 from source once November hits, that's gonna take up the majority of my time. After I get the first release of CM9 out, I'll start work on a 3.0 kernel if it hasn't been done yet. I have no experience whatsoever dealing with kernels though, except for small ramdisk edits, so don't expect any miracles.
It should be possible to port other JB ROM's over using one of nik's ported JB ROM's as a base and reference point, the only problem is I don't know exactly what files I have to substitute to port a ROM. I've PM'd nik about that a few hours ago, so hopefully I'll get some more information on the subject. Nik has been a big help to my dev efforts as a whole.
l0st.prophet said:
The source doesn't need changing, it is the ramdisk that is the problem. I have been trying to get help, but so far no luck, adi_pat said he would take a look, but it is hard for me to test as I no longer have an inc s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, if it's only the ramdisk that needs changing, couldn't you look at the ramdisk from one of niks JB ROM's? Or is it not as simple as that? I'm assuming the latter, seeing as if it were that obvious I'm sure someone would've done it by now. If you ever need help testing, send me a PM I'd be more than willing to test for you.
ZaySk said:
I'm gonna worry mainly about compiling CM9 from source once November hits, that's gonna take up the majority of my time. After I get the first release of CM9 out, I'll start work on a 3.0 kernel if it hasn't been done yet. I have no experience whatsoever dealing with kernels though, except for small ramdisk edits, so don't expect any miracles.
It should be possible to port other JB ROM's over using one of nik's ported JB ROM's as a base and reference point, the only problem is I don't know exactly what files I have to substitute to port a ROM. I've PM'd nik about that a few hours ago, so hopefully I'll get some more information on the subject. Nik has been a big help to my dev efforts as a whole.
Interesting, if it's only the ramdisk that needs changing, couldn't you look at the ramdisk from one of niks JB ROM's? Or is it not as simple as that? I'm assuming the latter, seeing as if it were that obvious I'm sure someone would've done it by now. If you ever need help testing, send me a PM I'd be more than willing to test for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
About using one of Nik's JB roms as a reference
What I understood was that the rom has been built around the old 2.6.x kernel and has to be modified again to work with the 3.0.x kernel, if you guys get one up and running. If that is the case, wouldn't you be going down the wrong path if you model it around nik's existing 2.6.x roms?
We need kaijura here, he was our AOSP kernel master. Hopefully he is doing ok, and has found something else other than xda because he hasn't been online for months. At least other devs, like lordclokan and kali- have moved on and are active with other devices... kaijura hasn't been on at all. Anyone been in contact with him/her?
markj338 said:
About using one of Nik's JB roms as a reference
What I understood was that the rom has been built around the old 2.6.x kernel and has to be modified again to work with the 3.0.x kernel, if you guys get one up and running. If that is the case, wouldn't you be going down the wrong path if you model it around nik's existing 2.6.x roms?
We need kaijura here, he was our AOSP kernel master. Hopefully he is doing ok, and has found something else other than xda because he hasn't been online for months. At least other devs, like lordclokan and kali- have moved on and are active with other devices... kaijura hasn't been on at all. Anyone been in contact with him/her?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, it would be going down a pretty redundant path. If I was able to port over a JB ROM using nik's ROM's as a base, then my ported ROM would inherit all the same bugs nik's ROM's already have.
I wish kaijura was still around, I have so many questions I want to ask about compiling from source! Luckily lordclokan was a massive help to me in that regard. Kaijura's github hasn't seen action in months either, sadly.
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't the Desire HD essentially our device with a bigger screen and less memory? That being the case, could we not just port across one of the 3.0 Kernels from that?
The problem with the ramdisk that come with the official ROM's that have 3.0 kernels, is that they are built for the sense framework and don't work on AOSP ROM's. The ram disk that is included with Nik's JB ROM's is heavily modified to run a GB kernel with ICS / JB sources, so the problem is I don't have a base to work from, I am basically trying to merge the two init's to make the 3.0 kernel boot.
Saying that we need to port 3.0 kernel is probably a bit misleading, and for that I apologise, the kernel itself has very little Sense specific stuff, it's the ramdisk that is responsible for launching the kernel that is the issue here at the moment.
The only problem with the desire HD kernel would be that our front camera would not work
+ I forgot to link to adi_pat's post - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=33291894
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
l0st.prophet said:
The problem with the ramdisk that come with the official ROM's that have 3.0 kernels, is that they are built for the sense framework and don't work on AOSP ROM's. The ram disk that is included with Nik's JB ROM's is heavily modified to run a GB kernel with ICS / JB sources, so the problem is I don't have a base to work from, I am basically trying to merge the two init's to make the 3.0 kernel boot.
Saying that we need to port 3.0 kernel is probably a bit misleading, and for that I apologise, the kernel itself has very little Sense specific stuff, it's the ramdisk that is responsible for launching the kernel that is the issue here at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you can prolly get ideas from adi ( he posted http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=33302707&postcount=387 not sure if you saw it) he seems to know what's up.
TheDareDevil said:
The only problem with the desire HD kernel would be that our front camera would not work
+ I forgot to link to adi_pat's post - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=33291894
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it looks like the furthest things got regarding a 3.0 Kernel was;
Adi_Pat said:
chan
Ok so 2.6.35 works with Jellybean. Why not pack the ramdisk with zImage compiled from 3.0.y sources(Considering you are using standard boot.img format[?]) Because to get it to boot, you would not require any hacks/changes to source, editing ramdisk(init.rc) is enough to make it boot initally.
EDIT: You may also need to change init binary.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
l0st.prophet said:
The problem with the ramdisk that come with the official ROM's that have 3.0 kernels, is that they are built for the sense framework and don't work on AOSP ROM's. The ram disk that is included with Nik's JB ROM's is heavily modified to run a GB kernel with ICS / JB sources, so the problem is I don't have a base to work from, I am basically trying to merge the two init's to make the 3.0 kernel boot.
Saying that we need to port 3.0 kernel is probably a bit misleading, and for that I apologise, the kernel itself has very little Sense specific stuff, it's the ramdisk that is responsible for launching the kernel that is the issue here at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very interesting, thanks for the informative post. :good:
zaysk said:
very interesting, thanks for the informative post. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
happy november!!!
markj338 said:
happy november!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A very happy November indeed
Hi all,
I've heard of the SiyahKernel for the I9300 which has dual boot functionality.
Does anybody know if this works on the I9305? Or is there a dual boot kernel available which is made for the I9305 in special?
Reason why I want to have dual boot:
I'm a huge Ubuntu fan. And what I've understood from what I've read is that it's CM(10?) based. So I'd like to use that as second rom. (I know, there isn't a version for the I9305 available right now, but I'll give it a try to port it from I9300 to the I9305.)
Thanks in advance.
As far as I was aware there is no dual boot yet for our device
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
If their is then its in Development .
jje
Does it take much time to make a kernel which supports dual boot ?
Does anybody know how to port a kernel from I9300 to the I9305 ? Is it hard work to do that ?
And why does the 1GB extra and LTE support make such a difference for ROMS on the device ?
Thanks in advance.
Its not so much the difference as developers actually wanting to work on the phone . Nobody pays them its their choice what to develop . jje
tloader11 said:
Does it take much time to make a kernel which supports dual boot ?
Does anybody know how to port a kernel from I9300 to the I9305 ? Is it hard work to do that ?
And why does the 1GB extra and LTE support make such a difference for ROMS on the device ?
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Thats not REALLY hard, however you have to know what to do. Looking and comparing sources is good point to start. Take a look at gokhan or googy commits about dual boot for example.. Personally, I havent been interested in it, but I might look into it, why not
2. Apart from these, we have other radio, and that causes so much trouble with ROM differences..
Hbohd said:
1. Thats not REALLY hard, however you have to know what to do. Looking and comparing sources is good point to start. Take a look at gokhan or googy commits about dual boot for example.. Personally, I havent been interested in it, but I might look into it, why not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool ! That would be awesome
Hbohd said:
2. Apart from these, we have other radio, and that causes so much trouble with ROM differences..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's cool that we have radio, but.... why do we need it ? seriously... we all have a mobile network subscription these days
Couldn't we just drop that in the beta/alpha versions, and add it in later then ? ;s
tloader11 said:
Cool ! That would be awesome
It's cool that we have radio, but.... why do we need it ? seriously... we all have a mobile network subscription these days
Couldn't we just drop that in the beta/alpha versions, and add it in later then ? ;s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean, another radio, like baseband, ril etc. I wasn't talking about normal FM radio (we haven't even got one in i9305).
However, taking only these proper files (like ril + modem) from our ROMs and take them to i9300 ROMs might work, I tried some time ago doing same thing with temasek's cm10.1 and it worked.. Unfortunately I wasn't able to compile fully stable and well working kernel (based on temasek's sources) therefore I do not use it now ;p
Hbohd said:
I mean, another radio, like baseband, ril etc. I wasn't talking about normal FM radio (we haven't even got one in i9305).
However, taking only these proper files (like ril + modem) from our ROMs and take them to i9300 ROMs might work, I tried some time ago doing same thing with temasek's cm10.1 and it worked.. Unfortunately I wasn't able to compile fully stable and well working kernel (based on temasek's sources) therefore I do not use it now ;p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh, stupid mistake >< sorry for that!
Would still be nice of you could look at the dual boot feature for our device !
This is Strictly Development i u know something plz share if don't then be slient
What is ION .?
Noob way :- It makes things awsome -by lauppenstepperwolf
there is awsome explaination on LX git Wiki
LX said:
#### What is Shared Memory?
Memory is usually private; an app takes a chunk and nothing else can access it.
Sometimes, it makes sense to share memory between processes; for example, an app writes to the screen buffer, while the gfx driver reads that same buffer to put it on the screen. You need a special memory system for that.
####PMEM vs. ION
Back with Gingerbread, every ARM chip maker (Qualcomm, TI, nVidia, Samsung, more?) had their own way of doing shared memory. The Qualcomm way was a system called **PMEM**.
Problem: when a vendor sells a chip to Sony and Samsung, he needs to write two drivers, one for each shared memory system.
To reduce maintenance efforts, Google introduced **ION**, a unified shared memory system, that all vendors use since ICS
Problem: from ICS forward, Qualcomm only provides graphics drivers for ION. PMEM is obsolete.
For a while, stuff still worked, but it is getting worse for us - see the Google Maps app for example.
####Move to ION
An option is to rework the kernel, replace the PMEM system with ION, and replace the old PMEM drivers with newer ION drivers. A common problem on several old devices is, that the camera chip is non-standard, and Sony (Samsung, HTC) never wrote ION drivers for the old cameras. Moving to ION then means you lose the camera completely.
A new solution is to move the kernel to ION, but have a PMEM system on top of ION so that the old camera libs can connect to it. As far as I know, this was pioneered by the Dev_Connection team that maintains the Samsung S+ i9001 (great team, hats off to Christopher83 especially).
Another implementation of an ION/PMEM hybrid was made by galaxyfreak for the HTC Explorer (Pico).
The i9001 and the Pico have similar hardware to our 2011 Xperias (2011, MSM, 512MB RAM, similar specs).
Feedback for the ION builds is very positive. Performance is good and it solves some graphics problems like the Google Maps flickering, and it solves the slow browser.
####ION on LegacyXperia
It would be the next big step after the 3.x kernel, but, it's a lot of work.
On the i9001, 8 devs work on 1 device, while on our side, 1 dev works on 8 devices.
The i9001 approach was to migrate 10.1 to ION, then 10.2, then 11; instead of directly doing 11-ION.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ETA :- Nowhere to release
============================================================================
THIS IS A REWORK ON nAa-kernel to use ION but with no video recording support ... until mike does spread his awsome magic with his new scratch ported kernel...
Source :- http://www.github.com/rebel-x/msm7x30-3.4.x-nAa
Current Progress : Intial Pushes done "yay" lets hope it boots
NOTE :- We need your help , i m not able to do alone since i have very limited knowledge about kernels , Please forgive me if my coding somewhere wrong cause
ok so thank you i will post progress as we all get step further ,
thank you
Credits :
Mike : we all know why
nAa : Awsome dev
szezso : always helpful
XDA:DevDB Information
ION-Kernel, a Kernel for the Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
Contributors
officiallysonyrebel, szezso, Mike
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2014-01-08
Last Updated 2014-01-07
Don't ever give up!
you also need To build rom with ion accelator
offical
its offical jb kernel ?
mahsun72 said:
its offical jb kernel ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you read? It's not even official. It could be also for CM11 since he mentioned browser lag, which is an existing bug in CM11.
To OP, I should be able to check the coding and whatnot. Only problem is I'm currently in the army and unable to access my computer on weekdays.
僕のLT18iから送られてきた
@n1kolaa i guess you can start work on this if you have time.. I have seen you working.. Seems a real genius can you?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I should also be able to check the code as I'm proficient in C++. Let me know where I can help out, it's a good initiative.
ION and PMEM should'nt be device specific, no ? Isn't the work done on i9001 reusable here ?
First it could be interesting to locate all patches applied on the kernel to implement the hybrid memory allocation.
Edit :
I suppose the kernel in question is this one :
https://github.com/AriesVE-DevCon-TEAM/samsung-kernel-msm7x30/tree/cm-11.0_ion_pmem_adsp
Boudin said:
ION and PMEM should'nt be device specific, no ? Isn't the work done on i9001 reusable here ?
First it could be interesting to locate all patches applied on the kernel to implement the hybrid memory allocation.
Edit :
I suppose the kernel in question is this one :
https://github.com/AriesVE-DevCon-TEAM/samsung-kernel-msm7x30/tree/cm-11.0_ion_pmem_adsp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ion is different for every device i guess
Update :
finished initial kernel part (lets hope it boots know)
vishal_android freak said:
@n1kolaa i guess you can start work on this if you have time.. I have seen you working.. Seems a real genius can you?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im now focus on shool,also i give my arc to my sister i now have only idol mini
n1kolaa said:
im now focus on shool,also i give my arc to my sister i now have only idol mini
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that's still fine.. Mini you have for testing.. Give it a try, you never know what you can end up with, probably a working kernel with ion support.. :thumbup:
Regards,
vishal_android freak
vishal_android freak said:
Well, that's still fine.. Mini you have for testing.. Give it a try, you never know what you can end up with, probably a working kernel with ion support.. :thumbup:
Regards,
vishal_android freak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its idol mini form alcatel,how can i test new kernel with it explain it to me
n1kolaa said:
its idol mini form alcatel,how can i test new kernel with it explain it to me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh.. My bad.. Sorry..
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I think I can develop based on this. Is the ION kernel actually booting and working preperly etc. ?
CedArctic said:
I think I can develop based on this. Is the ION kernel actually booting and working preperly etc. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have completed allocation but that f**kin msmfb code is a heck since we are using drivers from 3.0 need a lot of work
rebelos said:
i have completed allocation but that f**kin msmfb code is a heck since we are using drivers from 3.0 need a lot of work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all the best bro.. Any improvements?
gpkumaran said:
all the best bro.. Any improvements?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea its compiling know but no where Close to Boot ... i have changes locally purchased a XMP with screen destroyed only for kernel debugging purpose
rebelos said:
i have completed allocation but that f**kin msmfb code is a heck since we are using drivers from 3.0 need a lot of work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your work! I love KK rom and im wait ion kernel :thumbup:
Regards
To many 4.4 roms are coming out....in my opinion all kitkat devs should focus on just 2 roms and this really good kernel.
At least with 2 different 4.4 roms there is still competiton for improvement without scattering work to much.
A nicely developed kitkat will save out Arc from retirement.
Btw i was wondering, since HDMI sources for kitkat are not available, would it be possible to create-compile a MHL compatibility for our arc? so we can use MHL accessory instead of HDMI? Or a virtual machine on kitkat running the stock ICS HDMI feature?
I'm no dev so i have no idea how hard it could be.....just asking out of curiosity, many use hdmi on arc for movies or android desktop with OTG mouse and keyboard. Its really a pity we cannot make it work on 4.4 yet.
Dr.SAM88 said:
To many 4.4 roms are coming out....in my opinion all kitkat devs should focus on just 2 roms and this really good kernel.
At least with 2 different 4.4 roms there is still competiton for improvement without scattering work to much.
A nicely developed kitkat will save out Arc from retirement.
Btw i was wondering, since HDMI sources for kitkat are not available, would it be possible to create-compile a MHL compatibility for our arc? so we can use MHL accessory instead of HDMI? Or a virtual machine on kitkat running the stock ICS HDMI feature?
I'm no dev so i have no idea how hard it could be.....just asking out of curiosity, many use hdmi on arc for movies or android desktop with OTG mouse and keyboard. Its really a pity we cannot make it work on 4.4 yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A better Kitkat .. lets summerize current kernel situation
1. nAa 3.4 full of hacks
2. using drivers and stuffs from 3.0.x
3. Stuck on Abandoned PMEM {with every increasing android version we are using patches more than before to maintain PMEM causing soo many graphic lags
4. msm_fb code /* lets not focus on it currently */
why this mess /* to bring 3.4 kernel faster */
i m trying on 3.0.x-nAa kernel cause it is Pure CAF and also mike is working on Pure CAF 3.4.x MHL enablin gis such a lot and lot of work we are not in fully stable stage to look at MHL and other workaround first..
our device is a 3 year old piece of hardware without camera and HDMI libs using outdated kernel and drivers what should be the main goal
1. To make kernel updated with current sources
2. then make things working
3. then wprkaround for all abandoned hardware(like HDMI)
hope u know why we are focus on kernels and roms know ... and to come at point of compeion in roms
there is no compeition we are not selling our products .. we are working cause we like it and more roms means more respect for developers who are working tirelessly on maintaining those roms @Marchinho6 please no these kinds of post ..!these will spam thread
Welcome to the official thread for the Lollipop roms for our Optimus 2x
As to start, this thread is exclusively for the developers who are interessted/working on on the Lollipop ports for our Optimus 2x
We had alredy some build like the OmniRom , CM12 and even ParanoidAndroid.
This thread is exclusively for discussions for the developers and for the testers to test the new made roms so I will update the links as the roms get made. So I am only posting here the links of the latest version, to get the versions from the past you wil need to browse throught this thread
Update 05/6/2016
Gucky did it again! New build for CyanogenMod 12.1 is up, and now with fixed camera! When I get the full list of working features and bugs, I will upload it here. Thank you Gucky for your massive help and contribution to this community. This device is very old after all, and you still find the time to tinker on it. No words really. Respect!
CM12.1 : https://sourceforge.net/projects/lg...cm-12.1-20160531-UNOFFICIAL-p990.zip/download
WARNING the Rom is still not stable, but we are close!
ParanoidAndroid: https://s.basketbuild.com/devs/Puri/p990/AOSPA(lollipop)
Take in mind that all these roms are unstable besides the CM12 rom,but it still has some major bugs which we as a group will fix.
As in all of this, stay tuned for updates
Good job my friend
Thank you very much. I'm downloading right now. It would be useful, if you could upload your (Lokal) Manifest, too. So we are able to re- build the rom with the necessary changes.
Looking forward!
Credits goes to you!
um
gucky01 said:
Thank you very much. I'm downloading right now. It would be useful, if you could upload your (Lokal) Manifest, too. So we are able to re- build the rom with the necessary changes.
Looking forward!
Credits goes to you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um.......*noob mode activated.....BOOP * what you mean with manifest? lol
Could you please share your sources.
TheMysteryouse said:
Hello everyone.As you might know me from some threads where i comment some stuff.Anyways, since Lollipop was announced i was obssesed with it and my wish was that i would be the first one to make the version availble for our device.
Well i kinda did it....KINDA of course but we need some help if we wanna make it work.I call ALL of the developers for our device to work together to make it work.We are so close to get it fully booting.I made it boot to the animation and now where the help comes in use.We need some developers who can enable ADB on our device in the bootanimation.TO be honest i dont really know anything about sources and that stuff but i know some things.With the help of @tonyp and @timduru which I am the most thankfull of that gave me hope to make this.So here we go!
WARNING!!!
ONLY FOR DEVELOPERS
No one should download and flash this rom because you will get stuck in the bootanimation and will need to install previouse rom again and install everything over...blah blah blah.
Also the link to the rom is here ----> https://www.dropbox.com/s/fwhg08ux7qhtgsh/5.0 test.zip?dl=0
So if someone gets it working, please pm me in the progress. Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TheMysteryouse said:
um.......*noob mode activated.....BOOP * what you mean with manifest? lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a little help.
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Doc:_Using_manifests
Oh
Hugo-PT said:
a little help.
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Doc:_Using_manifests
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well to be honest, i dont really know how to share the menifest because i didn't use much the source. I was porting the Cm11 tonyp's rom and the rom from timduru, so i dont really know how to share the manifest lol
TheMysteryouse said:
Well to be honest, i dont really know how to share the menifest because i didn't use much the source. I was porting the Cm11 tonyp's rom and the rom from timduru, so i dont really know how to share the manifest lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you change some files in the zips or did you build a new rom in the way Raum described, my friend?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/general/guide-cm11-how-to-build-cyanogenmod-11-t2515305
nope
gucky01 said:
Did you change some files in the zips or did you build a new rom in the way Raum described, my friend?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/general/guide-cm11-how-to-build-cyanogenmod-11-t2515305
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope, didn't touch anything other than the updater script i think and the build prop because i wanted fully stock experience
I can be your tester my phone got a battery problem so im having fun with flashing roms
I will try to exchange the updater script from my build with yours.
Lets see if I can flash mine.
And your your problem: I think there are one or more patches that we maybe need, witch timduru wont need because of the tegra3 hardware. (maybe some patch for our old egl hardware)
DJNoXD said:
I will try to exchange the updater script from my build with yours.
Lets see if I can flash mine.
And your your problem: I think there are one or more patches that we maybe need, witch timduru wont need because of the tegra3 hardware. (maybe some patch for our old egl hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, it might be that he used KatKiss from timduru for the TF101 which has a Tegra 2, but still our phone uses the Tegra 2 AP20H, while the TF101 uses Tegra 2 T20. Small difference in the chipset, but still a difference. Easiest would be to port from the Galaxy R or Captivate Glide, but they too struggle with Lollipop over in their forum. Anyway, TheMysteryouse used timduru's AOSP rom, so maybe it would be easier building the whole thing from the demo CM12 sources available.
nonono
DJNoXD said:
I will try to exchange the updater script from my build with yours.
Lets see if I can flash mine.
And your your problem: I think there are one or more patches that we maybe need, witch timduru wont need because of the tegra3 hardware. (maybe some patch for our old egl hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, this rom has NOTHING to do with the tegra 3 rom.I used the rom for TF101 tablet which is tegra 2 but had a cmall chipset difference.So yeah I am still trying to do some things like searching the framework sources from tony to see if he has a code in the build.prop which directly enables ADB from the boot, but cant really find it.Anyways try your best and so the others.Cheers
Hi guys, after some testings I could get booting to finish. There are some errors left. But I will work further this evening and upload the rom afterwards. Think this will remain a test build for some time, till Tony or DJ can fix the errors.
Stay tuned!
Any video or screenshot? xD
Sorry for nob request, but working well or not, its great to our comunity
p.s. if need tester in future, you, TheMysteryouse or DJNoXD.
Im ready for
...WoW!...That´s Good News...Thank You for All of You, Guy´s...
gucky01 said:
Hi guys, after some testings I could get booting to finish. There are some errors left. But I will work further this evening and upload the rom afterwards. Think this will remain a test build for some time, till Tony or DJ can fix the errors.
Stay tuned!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome news buddy! Lollipop on first power dual core android device! Switch to 1+ One as a primary phone for some reason but I will continue to follow and supporto you!
That is great!!! ))))))))
Ok. I have to go one step back. The rom is not ready for the testers and I'm too tired to test more. For those, who want to repeat my steps or want to finish...
I replaced the files in Mystery's rom with my own Kitkat ones. The first half, than the second. Now I could get it to finish the booting process. This steps I went on and on. So I could reduce the problem to the framework-files in "system". If you replace all of them, it boots up with some error messages.
I think we have to reduce the 40 files inside more and more to find the reason for the bootloop.
All the best to you,my friends!
Damm this is great a device from 2010 receives android L. 4years later. If I can borrow the old optimus 2x from my father then I could also look into the problems if it's not booting yet then. Till then continue your work.
HI GUYS I HAVE BUILD THIS ROM I KNOW ITS NOT A CM5126631 OR LIENAGE OS... BUTS ITS A ROM THAT I WILL TRY AS MUCH AS I CAN TO MAKE IT WORK 100 PERCENT ATLEAST TRY..
ITS BASED OF A HUAWEI Y550 IT HAS THE SAME PROCESSOR AND THE RAM AND THE CAMERA EVEN ..
IT RUNS OF A @Thestealth2 STOCK HTC BASED KERNAL THE DREAMER KERNEL ... :laugh:
SO YEAH GONA GIVE YOU THE LINK TOMORROW CUS THE ROM HAS TOO MANY BUGS TRYING TO FIX AS MUCH AS I CAN UNTIL TOMORROW PEACE GUYS :good:
I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY THING THAT HAPENTS TO YOUR DEVICE,DO THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK
SPEACIAL THANKS TO:
@Thestealth2 FOR PROVIDING US A AMAZING KERNEL
PEOPLE WHO BUILD A CM11 FOR HUAWEI Y550 (GONE NAME THEM TOMORROW OT OF NET..)
FULL WIPE IS NEEDED THIS ROM IS SMOOTH BUT CURRENT BUGS AR PERTY MUCH ALL... I WILL BE GIVING YOU WEEKLY UPDATES AS I WILL BE TRYING TO FIX IT BUT CLEAN FLASH IS NEEDED
FIRST RELEASE:07,01,2017:https://www.mediafire.com/?lbc63lmbfm2bow1
GAPPS US ANY I USED THIS ONES THEY WORKED FINE: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=745425885120693973
bugs: all.. the rom boots,no lockscreen no call and message no camera no sound(have to patch mixer_paths.xml) no wifi no data no signal yeah settings fc on certain settings.. a lot to work for this rom to get it working... need to build a kernel for this cm11 but if you know how to build it you will not only help me you will help others i am trying to make it to but linux complications as usualy
I will give this a shoot when I'm free. You should upload your source code to Github so that other dev's around here can contribute a little something. Thank you for making this. I know a little trick how to enable OTA updates directly from you...send me a PM if you are interested. Cheers
denny.hell said:
I will give this a shoot when I'm free. You should upload your source code to Github so that other dev's around here can contribute a little something. Thank you for making this. I know a little trick how to enable OTA updates directly from you...send me a PM if you are interested. Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ohh i forgot to mention a big problem.....
i used a cm11 rom from huawei y550 and done some changing in the rom so it can run on this device an took htc-s kernel and put it in that cm11..
but yeah cm12.1 that im testing is almost bugles the camera is the biggest bug currently need drivers for the camera an i will release it
ROM is working kinda bad on my phone.
Bugs (for me): external SD not working, home button not working, most of the apps chrashes instantly
Great work btw
Napert said:
ROM is working kinda bad on my phone.
Bugs (for me): external SD not working, home button not working, most of the apps chrashes instantly
Great work btw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks i know but there is a big chance of me failing to get it to work not much drivers ya know .. specialy for camera i cant find a cm11 rom for a device with the same chip (msm8916) that has x64 architecture it would be no problem for me to get it working but yeah if you dont have pain you will not get gain i guess
I got the device hard bricked...
lgl90 said:
I got the device hard bricked...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wat.
Napert said:
Wat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hard bricked my device.. if you guys wan get future updates i will need a testers but testers have to know the risk of getting their device bricked just as i did with min but there are small chances but yeah i guess i ****ed up
Sure, why not, i have my device pretty much destroyed (going into hboot = 0PCVIMG.ZIP fail and reboot into fastboot where it repeats, OS laggy as hell, camera glass is gone and backplate falls off when im touching it, etc.) and i want to help even a bit.
Any news?