I've tried CM9 and in terms of general fluidity it wins CM11 lags at home screen and app drawer etc, the question is
is that the case of nightly builds of cm11 vs stable cm9 or is it the case of android 4.4.2 vs 4.0.3 ?
thanks
Related
Hi there,
I recently got a Galaxy Tab P1000 (the one that suppports 3G).
Now since I'm a very big fan of CM I'd like to install it.
I already have Clockwork Mod Recovery so I just have to transfer the CM10 build and gapps and I'm all set.
Now the most important thing for me is GPU overclocking for games,xbmc and of course to keep the UI lag at a minimum.
So there are a few builds of available.
Android 4.1.2:
CyanogenMod 10 Nightly Builds by cdesai: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1871113
Android 4.2.1:
CM10.1 build based on SGT7 by Alroger: http://cafe-ti.blog.br/1956~cm10-1-sgt7-p1000.html
CyanogenMod 10.1 Experimental Builds by cdesai: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2032726
CM10.1 SGT by HumberOS: http://www.humberos.com.br/
Android 4.1.2 or 4.2.1?:
Paranoid Android 2.53 by henryedwardrose: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1747128
The above builds seem most popular.
I know the CM10.1 builds have broken bluetooth and some minor rotation bugs I can live with.
But which one does support GPU overclocking and is most fluent?
Also what application must I use to achieve this, setcpu maybe?
Thanks
AOKP ICS milestone #6 overclocking
Ginosius said:
Hi there,
I recently got a Galaxy Tab P1000 (the one that suppports 3G).
Now since I'm a very big fan of CM I'd like to install it.
I already have Clockwork Mod Recovery so I just have to transfer the CM10 build and gapps and I'm all set.
Now the most important thing for me is GPU overclocking for games,xbmc and of course to keep the UI lag at a minimum.
So there are a few builds of available.
Android 4.1.2:
CyanogenMod 10 Nightly Builds by cdesai: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1871113
Android 4.2.1:
CM10.1 build based on SGT7 by Alroger: http://cafe-ti.blog.br/1956~cm10-1-sgt7-p1000.html
CyanogenMod 10.1 Experimental Builds by cdesai: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2032726
CM10.1 SGT by HumberOS: http://www.humberos.com.br/
Android 4.1.2 or 4.2.1?:
Paranoid Android 2.53 by henryedwardrose: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1747128
The above builds seem most popular.
I know the CM10.1 builds have broken bluetooth and some minor rotation bugs I can live with.
But which one does support GPU overclocking and is most fluent?
Also what application must I use to achieve this, setcpu maybe?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I took the journey last week from Froyo on my tab p1000 to ICS. I am on AOKP ICS milestone #6. I also tried GPU overclocking as AOKP ROM supports it. but dont expect miracles. To read about my experience, I have already posted in detail on my blog singaporeanipaduser.blogspot.com. Based pn the smartbench 2011 benchmark, my Tab came in at only 894 for the Productivity index and 2091 for the Games index. After overclocking the CPU from 1Ghz to 1.2Ghz, the scoring improved to 1019 for the Productivity index and no significant change for the Games index(~2034). After bringing back the CPU to default, the GPU was overclocked from 200Mhz to 320Mhz. This time, the Productivity index registered 897 while the Games index improved slightly to 2118. The overclocking options are available on the AOKP ICS ROM in the Performance Tweaks section under Settings.
Hi - I want to have a rom most like the standard android jellybean seen on the Google Nexus 7 for example.
Which Rom should I go for?
many thanks
This one:
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images
on Galaxy Note?!
You'll want something AOSP based so for example: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1796217
That is cyanogenmod 10.1 (Jelly Bean 4.2.2) - they are nightly builds as they are not entirely stable.
whats the most stable one? For example I have used PA which is great but would slim bean be more stable?
What I mean by stable is that they claim they are unstable - sometimes something isn't working with cyanogenmod but then it is working the next day with the new nightly, they can all be use as a daylt build though. As for slim bean - they usually have the odd bug in each of their builds, I haven't checked out their 4.2.2 build 1 or 2 however.
In short words - don't worry about the stability.
leonidas540bc said:
whats the most stable one? For example I have used PA which is great but would slim bean be more stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For the last couple of weeks I've been using SlimBean 4.2.2 and Carbon 4.2.2.
Both are clean, pure and stable.
How smooth are any of the jelly bean roms working for you guys? I recently tried two different CM10 roms and they were nowhere near as smooth as the latest CM9 nightlies. Is project butter not working to full effect? Or is our aging APQ8064 the problem or is it the 2.6 kernel these roms use?
(I Acme-Uninstalled all elements of android and then re-installed using AcmeInstaller 3 before I tried the CM10 roms.)
topdawg7793 said:
How smooth are any of the jelly bean roms working for you guys? I recently tried two different CM10 roms and they were nowhere near as smooth as the latest CM9 nightlies. Is project butter not working to full effect? Or is our aging APQ8064 the problem or is it the 2.6 kernel these roms use?
(I Acme-Uninstalled all elements of android and then re-installed using AcmeInstaller 3 before I tried the CM10 roms.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use CM10, unofficial 03/08 version.
I like it better, but to each his own...........
topdawg7793 said:
How smooth are any of the jelly bean roms working for you guys? I recently tried two different CM10 roms and they were nowhere near as smooth as the latest CM9 nightlies. Is project butter not working to full effect? Or is our aging APQ8064 the problem or is it the 2.6 kernel these roms use?
(I Acme-Uninstalled all elements of android and then re-installed using AcmeInstaller 3 before I tried the CM10 roms.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find CM10 to be much smoother than CM9, especially in the browser and general use. I did notice that it can take a day or so to smooth out, also supercharging really helps with memory management. Another thing that helps a lot is setting the up threshold to 35 in setcpu, this also helps a lot in CM9.
I'm am using CM10 old bootloader vresion 5.01.2013...and i was wondering if the Cm10.1 version from last days have major improvements like better camera, better ram usage and fewer errors and if the radio was added to 10.1 yet
i want to use a rom long time.Slim is good or cm10 or another ?
Probably Slim Bean
CM 10.0 stable in my case (andoid 4.1.2) was terrible. Much lag, unstable and terrible battery. However after changing kernel to Semaphore CM 10.0 was very stable, much smoother and better batterytime.
Now I am using CM 10.1.2 and it's original kernel is much better than the one of CM 10.0. However I am very curious how the performance will be with Semaphore.
But in between (after CM 10) I have flashed and used Slim Bean 4.2.1. It was like CM 10.0 on steroids and very stabble with better batterytime. I am very happy about CM10.1.2, but when Slim Bean comes with a stable 4.2.2 Android there is a 90 percent change I will go to that rom.
Choose slimbean 7.5, you will no regret!