Hi,
I'm a newbie, And yesterday I was posting a thread regardless of my phone trouble :
This One*
*It has been solved though
And now, My Device is using :
Android : Kit Kat [4.4.2]
ROM : [OFFICIAL] Vanir Nightlies
Kernel : 3.1.10-CM+,
I'm using GApps From here : This Link
And choosing 443Current-DHO-GAPPs.zip.
The first impression when I'm using this ROM, was It's so damn fast ! Haha, I like it very much.
But now, I'm facing issue with the Camera. The output can't be focus, so Blur .. :crying:
To tell You the truth, i don't know whether this GApps is compattible with my devices since I'm using version 4.4.2 not 4.4.3.
And that GApps zip name was 443, not 442(Can't find 442 there, just 44).
How to solve this issue ?
Please kindly advice sir, I don't know what to do
Oh ya, I'm just wondering What if I changed it into iodak kernel v9.5 [11.01.2014] ?
What if I change it to WerewolfJB kernel v009 [04-29-2014] ?
Is it compatible with my current devices environment ?
Is it the root cause of my Camera Blur (the Kernel version isn't compatible)?
I know the last 4 question is probably not related with the main question, but I'm just wondering You know, hhe.
p.s. :
- Please let me know if I got something wrong while posting thread here, I'm newbie in XDA Developer Forum.
- I still can't post in development section yet, so i made this thread , instead of asking directly to the Custom ROM respective maintenace
You are on roms based on nexus 7 2012 software. They are faster, but have some issues with camera (so yeah, blur doesn't work)
To "fix" the issue, look for roms based on official cm11 sources. Keep in mind that on 4.4.3, blur doesn't work with these roms either, so if you want it that bad, look for 4.4.2 version
Try use the official port cam at this link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2288917
I'm use this cam and iodak 9.95 on Beanstalk.
To Vanir 4.4.2 you can use this gapps: http://www.emccann.net/dho/5-Gapps/44Current-DHO-GAPPs.zip
Related
Hi everyone,
I would like upgrade my CyanogenMod but on official website is just old version on kernel Android 2.3.7.
So, there is my question.
If I want new Android, must I download new CyanogenMod (official?) or stock rom?
And if you have answer on my question can you post link too, please?
Thx
Sorry for my english
lubabe said:
Hi everyone,
I would like upgrade my CyanogenMod but on official website is just old version on kernel Android 2.3.7.
So, there is my question.
If I want new Android, must I download new CyanogenMod (official?) or stock rom?
And if you have answer on my question can you post link too, please?
Thx
Sorry for my english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since our phone is old there is no official support for CM, therfore later versions do not exist officially. Under dev section http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1028 in Inc s there is some CM 9 and CM 10 roms which is made by ours devs. You can see their respective threads what bugs they have and so on. A dev has managed to run latest kernel on CM 9. He is working on CM10 (there is a thread Cyan Vivo X) however still not released so if you wait maybe a week or two I bet he will be done with what he is doing and realease somewhat bugfree rom.
So I tried it. There are few problems but it looks fine.
Hello everyone After selling my xperia u I got this cellphone which is At&T branded .... I was running gingerDX on my xperia x8 a long time ago then I installed some custom roms on xperia U as well after unlocking it's bootloader and installing custom kernels etc. I sold xperia U as it was a bit slow for me....
Now the question I want to ask is : what are some good roms (without any bugs) fast and stable for this cellphone ? right now I'm on Android 4.1.1 official ... is it good enough if I only root it or should I go for a custom kernel / Rom and what is the easiest method to root it ?
Reagrds...
orangzeb said:
Hello everyone After selling my xperia u I got this cellphone which is At&T branded .... I was running gingerDX on my xperia x8 a long time ago then I installed some custom roms on xperia U as well after unlocking it's bootloader and installing custom kernels etc. I sold xperia U as it was a bit slow for me....
Now the question I want to ask is : what are some good roms (without any bugs) fast and stable for this cellphone ? right now I'm on Android 4.1.1 official ... is it good enough if I only root it or should I go for a custom kernel / Rom and what is the easiest method to root it ?
Reagrds...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Arrgh kernel for photon Q LTE works for our phone too, best and only(?) custom kernel we have besides N8 (only for 4.2.2 ROMs). Carbon, CM 10.2, PACman, and HoloBlur are my personal best experiences with this phone.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
Carbon 4.3 nighlies by far the best and most stable
Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk now Free
As for rooting and unlocking bootloader plus flashing a custom recovery, the Myth Tools program for Atrix HD has all those 3 things wrapped into one easy executable.
Here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2262726
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
ignore this.
Thank Neighbor808 if you provide 2, 3 links for roms and the link to kernel I'll be thankful to you.. as I don't want to risk anything here as I'm new to Motorola world
Generally, look for files under mb886. Anyways, here ya go.
CM: http://get.cm/?device=mb886
Carbon: http://goo.im/devs/carbon/mb886/nightly
PACman: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2398627
HoloBlur (Stock based): http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2356624
Argh Kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=31708952
Make sure you get CM 10.2 kernel for non stock based. Don't flash the kernel of the date of your nighty is later than the kernel (Oct 2 so far). It gets updated regularly.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
I can't figure out which kernel to download ASA / FFW ? I've downloaded Oct 2 version of carbon ROM, any thread with it's screenshots and features etc ?
Please also tell in which sequence I should do the procedure ? like : root > recovery > Unlock Bootloader > kernel and then rom ?
Root, unlock bootloader, recovery, backup current rom, wipe data and system, flash rom then kernel.
Sent from my PACMAN MATRIX HD MAXX
Deeje is spot on. As for which kernel to download, Post #2 contains the kernels for STOCK or Stock-based ROMs. All of the ROMs I linked to you are CM-Based except for HoloBlur, which is stock based (but it already comes with Arrgggh kernel so don't worry about that). The thread clearly states:
ASA-36 (Original 4.0.4 ICS firmware)
ASA-14 (Final 4.0.4 ICS firmware)
FFW-5 (Latest 4.1.2 JB firmware)
Pretty much the only stock kernel you're ever going to need unless you fastboot flash back to ICS is FFW-5.
Post #5 contains the kernels for CM-Based ROMs (Pretty much all the ROMs out there that aren't stock based). The CM 10.1 Kernel is for Android Version 4.2.2 ROMs, while the CM 10.2 kernel is for Android Version 4.3 ROMs. If you are flashing Carbon October 2 nightly, that is Android 4.3, so you will flash the CM 10.2 edition.
Here's links for the standalone posts to make sure you know where you're going...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock Kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=31708970&postcount=2
CM Kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=31717152&postcount=5
By the way, check Atrix HD Development section, has all of our ROMs + screenshots and explains features.
Thanks alot homie this explains everything now tell me some good features of Carbon / Pacman Roms so I consider flashing ?
Carbon is basically CyanogenMod with some great Paranoid Android features added in (like Halo, PIE, navbar customization, etc.) . Smooth, reliable, great battery. PACman is a combination of 3 popular ROMs (Paranoid Android, AOKP, CyanogenMod) and has pretty much every feature you can think of. Highly customizable, but has a few minor bugs and slightly worse battery. Carbon is more stable but not by a whole lot.
Official Carbon thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=42183613
[ROM][AOSP] [Nightly/Release] CarbonRom JB [MB886]
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
Make sure you get CM 10.2 kernel for non stock based. Don't flash the kernel of the date of your nighty is later than the kernel (Oct 2 so far). It gets updated regularly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
didn't understand this line...
Can I flash latest carbon nightly builds if my kernel date is earlier?
orangzeb said:
didn't understand this line...
Can I flash latest carbon nightly builds if my kernel date is earlier?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you can. Just take latest kernel currently - Oct 23 2013 CM10.2 and latest Carbon rom from here (*Currently there are some problems on goo.im*) or here.
Kernel and rom date should be close as possible to avoid problems.
If there will be newer kernel then it might not work if rom is older than kernel but even then if there are any problem you can just re-flash earlier kernel. Although you don't really have to mess with kernel at first. Carbon actually come with a working kernel (latest build have mattmanwrx kernel) but it doesn't support overclocking/undervolting.
Ohh, and don't forget to flash gapps if you need them..
Thanks mate... for me most stable versions of kernel and roms are : 7 oct 2013..... I don't want to change them untill something really big comes out....I don't like overclocking as ATRIX HD is fast enough already with or even without pureperformance mod but I see battery improvements via that mod or maybe that's "Greenify" app that I'm using...
Hi all, i'm searching for a stable ROM for my new GT-8910N, possibly with NFC support.
I've read about Maclaw's ROM, but i don't know what to choose, i need your help.
I'm coming from Nexus HD2 by tytung CM 10.2, and now the stock ROM 4.1.2 is a back step.
I want to upgrade to a stable ROM for a daily use, also for my wife's phone.
My phone details:
GT-8910N
ANDROID 4.1.2
BASE BAND I8910NXXALL6
KERNEL 3.0.31-742346
BUILD JZO54K.I8910NXXALL6
Thanks in advance from Italy.
Hi bud, look if you want a ROM receiving the NFC support you better stick to stock rom or a custom one based in stock 'cause Maclaw's roms don't support NFC feature yet, well, that being said I've been since the beginning only with AOSP based roms so I don't really know which customs roms are out there that support the NFC feature but I think Dmod, Benz and Virginity roms support it you can check them out in the Android Development section, greetings man.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Thread closed as its a Best ROM thread.
After installing Xposed on my Cm 12.1 ( 5.1.1 ) whenever i do an normal reboot it showing ( Optimising App xxx of 122 ) It takes about half and hour to boot up the device. please tell any method to fix this , I'm very pissed .
I have the same problem, any solutions?
I got sick of it and downgraded to a Custom ROM based off of CM12. The ROM I'm using on my Galaxy Note 4 is Pac-ROM, I'm not here to advertise ROMs but I'm suggesting downgrading to CM12 again or perhaps finding other ROMs that are based off of Lollipop 5.0.x.
Try a pure AOSP or any other non-CM 5.1.1 ROM (but not MIUI). CM is too far from official Android to be fully compatible.
Getting the same problem with temasek cm 12.1 on my Oneplus One. It doesn't do it all the time but I'll say about 70% of the time it does it.
Sent from my Oneplus One
Try vanir ROM, a strip down version of cm12.1. It takes so long because it has to do with the ROM not able to pick up the mobile signal. I think install a log cat animation script by chainfire from the okay store will speed up the boot process, plus it looks cool.
Sent from my LG-E980 with Tapatalk.
Try to install the latest unofficial Xposed for 5.1 by GravityBox's author. He shared it yday.
Try to install the latest unofficial Xposed for 5.1 by GravityBox's author. He shared it yday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where?
Disclamer: This ROM was made for testing and educational purposes. It is not intended for commercial use.
Software included may be subject to copyright.
Flash this ROM at your own risk. Developer is not responsible for what you do on your device.*
This is a Rom in development , as of now main issue is boot loop, it is a port from the m8 gsm version
This is the download link
https://mega.nz/#!8oZ23SxR!2ALmBmVOSIXoZ-41KoXCae2z3S0lJQfhT9bv6DwZLSw
It is kitkat 4.4
Original thread here , with log cat and recovery txt
http://forum.xda-developers.com/sprint-htc-one/help/miui-v7-m7spr-t3274659
New build coming soon rebased
miko12312 said:
New build coming soon rebased
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
waiting for it
just 1 Q, it`s on kk or lollipop?
metal_messiah said:
waiting for it
just 1 Q, it`s on kk or lollipop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kk but I have seen lollipop ,maybe even try compiling from source ill try lollipop if possible this is my first post so it will be a little till a daily driver is put up
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=64811644
This is not my Rom but it does look like an official build, it is 4.4.3 which may have problems with newer firmware , I have gotten bootloops but I am having problems with my m7spr and will be downgrading to try this and attempt to use Rom
Official miui v7 for m7spr
miko12312 said:
Official miui v7 for m7spr
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess this only shows on the Chinese website? [I looked on en.miui.com] Is it still KK based?
Are we not better off following STRYDER~007's guide and building on a LP AOSP base if so?
Circular Pastry said:
I guess this only shows on the Chinese website? [I looked on en.miui.com] Is it still KK based?
Are we not better off following STRYDER~007's guide and building on a LP AOSP base if so?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its 4.4.4 and it would be better to build from source , as I have damaged my m7spr and switched back to the nexus 7 grouper ,I can not build or make this ROM without testing , I have only had problems with boot.IMG but it is pretty easy ,as of now there should be a 6.0 source I have seen it was ported to a new device
I'd be all for giving it a go. I think that sticking to 5.1.1 for now would make the most sense, 6.0 isn't anywhere near ready to daily at this point. - I could give the @STRYDER~007 method a go, but I'm not aware of any non CM bases. I don't have the room to compile from https://android.googlesource.com/ and I don't know of a "clean" AOSP ROM. Any suggestions there?
...I may give CM12 a try, it just seems that leaving as little room for error as possible would be ideal.