Related
I've created this thread so you can ask all your questions about Resurrection Remix. This way development thread will be cleaner.
I'll do my best to help you with your questions.
t4n017 said:
I've created this thread so you can ask all your questions about Resurrection Remix. This way development thread will be cleaner.
I'll do my best to help you with your questions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you learned how to solve the problem with WiFi for me it is very important and I think it is important to many
lolo696 said:
you learned how to solve the problem with WiFi for me it is very important and I think it is important to many
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I asked for help to @frapeti and @Paul L.
I know it's an important bug, but your question is like asking for ETA. You should wait or try to fix it by yourself.
You'll know when it's fixed.
Ask @Rox too
Does this ROM have low incall volume bug? (low incall volume + when you press volume down, it increases call volume) In CM11 this issue appears and it seem RR ROM uses same device sources.
And battery life? Is good or drain fast?
Slavo# said:
Does this ROM have low incall volume bug? (low incall volume + when you press volume down, it increases call volume) In CM11 this issue appears and it seem RR ROM uses same device sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I couldn't test before. I'll update the bugs lists in OP.
If it's present in CM11 I can't do anything because, as you said, I use those sources.
GæxD said:
And battery life? Is good or drain fast?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery is something personal, for me is the same as in other KK ROM's. You should test by yourself.
t4n017 said:
Yes, I couldn't test before. I'll update the bugs lists in OP.
If it's present in CM11 I can't do anything because, as you said, I use those sources.
Battery is something personal, for me is the same as in other KK ROM's. You should test by yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, bad so
Someone explain please
How is possible this rom to be official?
This is compiled from t4n017 and based on CM11 by TC and not compiled by original RR devs.
Sent from S Advance
dimitris99 said:
Someone explain please
How is possible this rom to be official?
This is compiled from t4n017 and based on CM11 by TC and not compiled by original RR devs.
Sent from S Advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm part of RR Team as an official maintainer of the ROM for janice.
Plus, we have OTA support now.
That's why it's declared as OFFICIAL.
Ah thanks for the answer.l
Last question, why then RR team build the rom from scratch for our device instead of that this rom is based on TC CM11.
Sent from S Advance
dimitris99 said:
Ah thanks for the answer.l
Last question, why then RR team build the rom from scratch for our device instead of that this rom is based on TC CM11.
Sent from S Advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you should learn a little bit more about sources, specially open sources.
It's not "based on CM11", but it uses device tree forked from TC repo.
Why build from scratch when we already have public sources? And, anyway, that should be made by RR devs (which I don't think possible as it will requiere lot of time, and they don't even have the phone).
I didn't know the things very well. Thanks.
Sent from S Advance
dimitris99 said:
I didn't know the things very well. Thanks.
Sent from S Advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's ok, and at least you asked on the right thread :good:.
I hope you enjoy this ROM.
why when I sews script nucleus through CWM can not turn on WiFi and acceleration does not work
lolo696 said:
why when I sews script nucleus through CWM can not turn on WiFi and acceleration does not work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man, we can't understand you. It's not the first time I have to read your question over and over again trying to understand what you want to say.
That way nobody can/will help you.
Please stop asking every single question you have, or at least ask them in a proper English.
PS: Damm, I gave you a thanks when trying to quote your comment (Tapatalk should separate a little bit more the buttons)
I'm trying a little more before returning JB because it is a great ROM. The only issue I have at the moment is INCALL VOL.
And Battery drain is higher than JB STOCK + Cocore 8.2.
My question right now is: camera. Quality of the photos is not good. Mainly Macros.
Videos untested.
Any suggestions to replace? Something closer to Stock CAM?
Or any tip for the cam in RR?
Thanks
edit WiFi Direct, Camera -> Panorama is laggy , Screen Recorder not working Not Tested
ADR USR said:
I'm trying a little more before returning JB because it is a great ROM. The only issue I have at the moment is INCALL VOL.
And Battery drain is higher than JB STOCK + Cocore 8.2.
My question right now is: camera. Quality of the photos is not good. Mainly Macros.
Videos untested.
Any suggestions to replace? Something closer to Stock CAM?
Or any tip for the cam in RR?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try to fix low incall volume bug. For the time being, you could try CM Utility app by @BMARo to fix low incall volume bug.
t4n017 said:
I'll try to fix low incall volume bug. For the time being, you could try CM Utility app by @BMARo to fix low incall volume bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont have low incall volume bug and i dont used that app.
Well my phone is not up to the mark for oc cause when I flashed the oc kernel the phone did not pass the gti9070 logo anyways flashed this ROM again as I love it
Sent from my GT-I9070 using Tapatalk
Is it possible to add doubletap2wake and some other gestures to the CM11 kernel?
SBColasito said:
Is it possible to add doubletap2wake and some other gestures to the CM11 kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a look in the original android development section for a different kernel, make sure you read the notes and the op post first to see if CM is supported, so many people don't and then wonder why their phone bricks.
Anything that says its a sense and GPE kernel wont work on CM.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/htc-one/orig-development
This one should meet your needs http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2522854
[Q&A] [ROM][UB][4.4.4][SP]AICP v6.0Android Ice Cold Project {unofficial build from s
Q&A for [ROM][UB][4.4.4][SP]AICP v6.0Android Ice Cold Project {unofficial build from sources}
Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.
Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [ROM][UB][4.4.4][SP]AICP v6.0Android Ice Cold Project {unofficial build from sources}. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.
Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy!
AICP
Will you update this rom ? for me smart status bar cant be disabled as well as some little bugs in aicp extras and rom controll.
Beside that its just perfect kitkat rom
Thank you for porting to Huashan
Spasik said:
Will you update this rom ? for me smart status bar cant be disabled as well as some little bugs in aicp extras and rom controll.
Beside that its just perfect kitkat rom
Thank you for porting to Huashan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once again asking ETA is not allowed on xda please.
Read my last comment on thread u will get your answer.
Q
Do i need do a clean install if i am upgrading from v2 vo v3 ?
Spasik said:
Do i need do a clean install if i am upgrading from v2 vo v3 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make a backup and try dirty flash, i guess u'll be ok but if u have bugs; then format data full wipes reflash rom and restore...
Tapatalked with Yuga
Alx31TLse said:
make a backup and try dirty flash, i guess u'll be ok but if u have bugs; then format data full wipes reflash rom and restore...
Tapatalked with Yuga
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have still smartpulldown bug and rear mic dont work.
Spasik said:
I have still smartpulldown bug and rear mic dont work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cuz i used aokp sources wich are not much updated, will be fixed in next update.
Alx31TLse said:
cuz i used aokp sources wich are not much updated, will be fixed in next update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thank you for your work
To Alx31TLse
Can anything be done on our end to increase touch sensitivity since you say you haven't incorporated glove mode in this ROM?
Is there a way I can replace just the recovery from a kernel? Can I replace the recovery on yours with one from a different kernel based on the same firmware? E.g the TWRP from the Williams kernel, a kernel which is compatible with your ROM or any other compatible kernel for that matter. Is it doable or do the two go hand in hand? Relatively easy or highly difficult?
Thanks.
XenolithicYardZone said:
To Alx31TLse
Can anything be done on our end to increase touch sensitivity since you say you haven't incorporated glove mode in this ROM?
Is there a way I can replace just the recovery from a kernel? Can I replace the recovery on yours with one from a different kernel based on the same firmware? E.g the TWRP from the Williams kernel, a kernel which is compatible with your ROM or any other compatible kernel for that matter. Is it doable or do the two go hand in hand? Relatively easy or highly difficult?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u can flash whatever custom kernel wich is made for CM purposes.
i didn't know twrp was working huashan (i mean for cm roms, its not the same for stock roms)
there's an app for glove mode if im not mistaken
And sorry but for now nothing can be done on my side.
Alx31TLse said:
u can flash whatever custom kernel wich is made for CM purposes.
i didn't know twrp was working huashan (i mean for cm roms, its not the same for stock roms)
there's an app for glove mode if im not mistaken
And sorry but for now nothing can be done on my side.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You misunderstand me...I don't want to flash a different kernel. Your kernel's great as it is. I tried William's kernel but I flashed yours back since the performance with your kernel was much better even without any OC. What I wanted to know was whether I could switch the CWM in yours with a TWRP or Philz. Just the recovery. Actually it was more of a general question. Normally can it be done and if so how does one go about doing it? Hope I am clear enough with my questions this time around.
Tried Galaxy S4 Glove Mode but the buttons to enable glove mode are greyed out since the kernel doesn't support it. Remember reading something about a line of code that needs to be set to yes to enable glove mode. So unless its set at kernel level, external apps won't work right? Isn't it similar to something like SetCPU or Trickster mod being pointless for overclocking unless the kernel has overclocking capabilities?
No worries man. Still a sweet ROM and I appreciate your reply. Like I said, just a tiny, tiny fly in an otherwise great ointment.
Im not sure abt it, i saw some pple said glove mode was working with app...anyways try others and see...
About recovery, u maybe have to investigate how to flash twrp on fota partition.
Alx31TLse said:
Im not sure abt it, i saw some pple said glove mode was working with app...anyways try others and see...
About recovery, u maybe have to investigate how to flash twrp on fota partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alrite I'll have a look at both :good:
XenolithicYardZone said:
Tried Galaxy S4 Glove Mode but the buttons to enable glove mode are greyed out since the kernel doesn't support it. Remember reading something about a line of code that needs to be set to yes to enable glove mode. So unless its set at kernel level, external apps won't work right? Isn't it similar to something like SetCPU or Trickster mod being pointless for overclocking unless the kernel has overclocking capabilities?
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The app for Xperia: "glove xperia".
Question about reliability
Hello,
I'm a user who want to find reliable rom for my phone xperia sp.
The stock rom is weak with lag and bugs...
When i'm searching on xda, there is a lot of rom but which the best ?
I don't want 5.1 because i don't want new features. I just want a rom that works.
So i have one question :
Do this rom works perfectly for daily use ?
No bugs, no lags, smooth, less battery consumption
Good wifi signal reception ?
Q&A for [KERNEL][exp: (3.1.10) #5] Firtecy Kernel - a modified Kowalski Kernel
Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.
Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [KERNEL][exp: (3.1.10) #5] Firtecy Kernel - a modified Kowalski Kernel. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.
Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy!
Hi. Firtecy Mr. have not build kernel LG SU660 are no? Thank Mr.
Firtecy Kernel #6
Hello,
I would like to know if there is any chance of Firtecy Kernel #6 because it was mentioned some months ago that it is in test phase.
Could you please tell me more about the progress of the Firtecy Kernel #6?
Thanks Firtecy!
I'm not an advanced user so don't mess around will kernel settings. Will the default settings in your kernel give compatible ROMs better performance over Kowalski's older kernel?
jonomcleish said:
Thanks Firtecy!
I'm not an advanced user so don't mess around will kernel settings. Will the default settings in your kernel give compatible ROMs better performance over Kowalski's older kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems to me that this thread is dead. Maybe, no one knows.
Anyway, if you want to know which kernel is the best one, you must try all of them. I have already tried m1 and 3.1 and in my humble opinion I think that the m1 is much better.
But if you are talking about the "default" 3.1 exp. kernel by Kowalski and modified 3.1 Kowalski kernel by Firtecy there are significant improvements in Firtecy version of that kernel. It has got better performance and more options to "customize" the kernel.
I would recommend you to test this kernel for a week and you will see if it fulfills your requirements or not. Also do not forget to read the whole discussion thread where are mentioned some tweaks and optional settings.
lubosmj said:
It seems to me that this thread is dead. Maybe, no one knows.
Anyway, if you want to know which kernel is the best one, you must try all of them. I have already tried m1 and 3.1 and in my humble opinion I think that the m1 is much better.
But if you are talking about the "default" 3.1 exp. kernel by Kowalski and modified 3.1 Kowalski kernel by Firtecy there are significant improvements in Firtecy version of that kernel. It has got better performance and more options to "customize" the kernel.
I would recommend you to test this kernel for a week and you will see if it fulfills your requirements or not. Also do not forget to read the whole discussion thread where are mentioned some tweaks and optional settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, thanks for the reply!
I think I'll try Firtecy's latest with the 32MB ramhack next time and check out the thread for tweaks like you said. Seems like it was last updated August 2014 while Kowalski's was last updated end of January 2014.
I do like the M1 and lots of people say it's better. I recently discovered that Google Play Music works on 3.1 though, and it barely works on M1 at all. That was the final thing that made me decide on 3.1 going forward. I don't think I've ever got wifi tether to work on 3.1 though, so I'll miss that.
adbd + TCP congestion-avoidance algorithm
would be nice if it is natively activated (app works fine)
or "on/off" in Kernel Control?!
adbd Insecure - >
Code:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1687590
need it for AndroidCommander on PC, it it is a nice android file manager for Windows with root access
And it would be nice if you insert an option in your Kernel Control for
"TCP congestion-avoidance algorithm"
Code:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_congestion-avoidance_algorithm
or push you Wlan-Max function to "Kernel Adiutor by Grarak"
Code:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/apps-games/app-kernel-adiutor-t2986129
Q&A for [KERNEL][CM12.1][LINARO 4.8] LeanKernel-r2 [LK][8/4/15]
Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.
Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [KERNEL][CM12.1][LINARO 4.8] LeanKernel-r2 [LK][8/4/15]. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.
Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy!
Hi Pizza_Dox,
One more kernel for our lovely moto g. ^^
I hope you will go on with your work like that.
The kernel is working pretty well but i would like to have more CPU-govenours and I/O-Shedulers to choose from. Will you add some more in the next time?
@Pizza_Dox
Which app should I use for tweaking your kernel? At the moment I use Kernel toolkit, which force closes now and then. Can you recommend an app?
stefan230 said:
Hi Pizza_Dox,
One more kernel for our lovely moto g. ^^
I hope you will go on with your work like that.
The kernel is working pretty well but i would like to have more CPU-govenours and I/O-Shedulers to choose from. Will you add some more in the next time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much, , this kernel is lean , we dont need any more governors, or i/o schedulers, the default cm ones are ok, but i will replace the defaults with optimized versions soon! check out r9, its wayy better
stefan230 said:
@Pizza_Dox
Which app should I use for tweaking your kernel? At the moment I use Kernel toolkit, which force closes now and then. Can you recommend an app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any app should do fine, try kernel adiutor, i use that personally oh and update the kernel since r9 is way faster and better
Pizza_Dox said:
Thank you very much, , this kernel is lean , we dont need any more governors, or i/o schedulers, the default cm ones are ok, but i will replace the defaults with optimized versions soon! check out r9, its wayy better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh okay. May recommend me a govenor? I dont really know which too choose, at the moment i use "ondemand". Im looking forward to see the improved govenor.
Pizza_Dox said:
Any app should do fine, try kernel adiutor, i use that personally oh and update the kernel since r9 is way faster and better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, thats right. The zRam disable gives me more free ram. Nice work. ^^
I still have a question, i hope i dont bother you with all my questions.
Do i have to enable "intelliplug" and "power-suspend" by my self, or is it enabled by default?
If not, where can I enable those two in kernel auditor?
Thanks answering my questions.
edit:
i found it in the r11 kernel.
Diamond pls. Does this support thea?