[REQ] Lollipop Kernel - Xperia SP Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Can someone create a modified kernel for Cyanogenmod12 24.11.2014 build, or make Williams kernel working for the same rom? Something with the same fuctions as Williams Kernel (oc,fauxsound and so on). Thanks in advance.

fantamadnesss said:
Can someone create a modified kernel for Cyanogenmod12 24.11.2014 build, or make Williams kernel working for the same rom? Something with the same fuctions as Williams Kernel (oc,fauxsound and so on). Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone also produce a fully working non crashing lollipop build by next tuesday please.
/sarcasm off
Asking for something like this is quite cheeky really, if someone like pecora is working on a lollipop kernel then they will but it takes a lot of work and effort to make something like a kernel. Learn how to code it yourself or just keep en eye on the development folder or better yet ask in pecoras thread if they will be updating for cm12 at all.

Oblox said:
Can someone also produce a fully working non crashing lollipop build by next tuesday please.
/sarcasm off
Asking for something like this is quite cheeky really, if someone like pecora is working on a lollipop kernel then they will but it takes a lot of work and effort to make something like a kernel. Learn how to code it yourself or just keep en eye on the development folder or better yet ask in pecoras thread if they will be updating for cm12 at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, i know its hard but i thought that is not so complicated, since williams kernel v8 is based on 12.1.A.1.207 sources, and so is cm12... So maybe "porting" williams kernel v8 kernel to cm12 is not so complicated? Maybe im wrong, explain me better
EDIT: Mr Steve did it again! By following these instructions Williams Kernel v8 will work on cm12 24.11.2014 build
MrSteve555 said:
Actually the bootloops on Williams kernel started when I added the kernel modules loading on boot in the ramdisk. It could clash with the inbuilt governors and other stuff, so kernel panics could occur.
I think that maybe removing these from the ROM zip could help:
/system/lib/modules/symsearch.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_limit.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_abyssplug.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_adaptive.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_badass.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_conservative.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_intelliactive.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_intellidemand2.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_intellimm.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_lagfree.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_lionheart.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_powersave.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_smartass2.ko
/system/lib/modules/cpufreq_wheatley.ko
/system/lib/modules/bfq-iosched.ko
/system/lib/modules/fifo-iosched.ko
/system/lib/modules/fiops-iosched.ko
/system/lib/modules/row-iosched.ko
/system/lib/modules/sio-iosched.ko
/system/lib/modules/vr-iosched.ko
/system/lib/modules/zen-iosched.ko
/system/lib/modules/zsmalloc.ko
/system/lib/modules/lzo.ko
/system/lib/modules/zram.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_bic.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_highspeed.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_htcp.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_hybla.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_illinois.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_lp.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_scalable.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_vegas.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_veno.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_westwood.ko
/system/lib/modules/tcp_yeah.ko
It's the full list, maybe some of them are missing in CM12 package which is not supposed to be used as a daily driver anyway. In the CM11 the files ought to be removed also from 12.5 delta patch. It has a big chance to work
But if it doesn't, well, I can't do much :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Related

[CM7][KERNEL]Unofficial Cyanogenmod 7 for Ace-i

reported it to be deleted.
wait till tomorrow for my new personal build
Will complete it later on.
Will complete it later on.
wuut?
This is yours CM7 or based on CM7 bieltv?
Alucard1989pl said:
This is yours CM7 or based on CM7 bieltv?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep my cm7 built from source
The device trees are by biel which I am working on.
downloading .... report in half an hour ...!
EDIT: Sbrick too, trying with hell lock now...
Phone has soft brick by kernel in your cm7 rom . . . system data and cache must be formated to ext4?
Alucard1989pl said:
Phone has soft brick by kernel in your cm7 rom . . . system data and cache must be formated to ext4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use hells fusion from the other thread..
I already use hells fusion kernel but when i installed your cm7 my phone stuck on splash screen and led for 1 sec turn on.
Alucard1989pl said:
I already use hells fusion kernel but when i installed your cm7 my phone stuck on splash screen and led for 1 sec turn on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
logcat? its really weird cuz it worked for someone else..
what instructions did u use?
prototype-U said:
use hells fusion from the other thread..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please include your kernel in this thread to make it clearer
You have to use this updater-script for flash cm7. If you don't use this one, the phone will get bricked. http://pastebin.com/htJ8NYTs
For use this updater-script you have to put in the first root of the zip two files: bmlunlock and busybox.
Remember to add the boot.img of hells fusion kernel at second post!
P.S. OP I think that you have to give credits to biel!
Soft Brick. Tried with hell lock flashable zip, softbrick with flashlight with 2 seconds. Now tried with the kernel you provided, stuck on the SGAi bootlogo. Any solution? You said it worked on someone else's device... How did he install? From stock or another rom?
EDIT: Now will try with the updater script you said, @Lopicl.00 . What attachment are you talking about?
mathm2013 said:
Soft Brick. Tried with hell lock flashable zip, softbrick with flashlight with 2 seconds. Now tried with the kernel you provided, stuck on the SGAi bootlogo. Any solution? You said it worked on someone else's device... How did he install? From stock or another rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Follow my post!
bricked the device while trying to install this rom, i had the kernel from your threat
Angryace said:
bricked the device while trying to install this rom, i had the kernel from your threat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Threat is something that puts you in danger
Well, I don't know which is the point of this thread. You are building my sources. You are making my ROM. Why create another thread? You don't have the device, me neither, but I started that project from 0. Why instead of making your CM7 you don't help us? Why don't you make a pull request? Do we need to talk with testers, which are the same for the both of us, to just test the same ROM!? If we want to have something big, we should focus on one CM and not building various CM7. I don't know which is the point of this, and I don't know what were you thinking. In your github there is 0 changes on my device tree. I committed all my changes during the last month and you used my work to build your own, and then it seems that your ROM is better than mine, because I don't release mid-done ROM's. I want to give the best expierence to all the users.
Also, I committed all the changes to help people understand on what I'm working. Many users asked me if I was really working on it, as I did not commit anything to github, but I was. And what happens if I commit? other users use my work to build their ROM's? I think that's not the way to go.
And what about a simple credit to the real author of this ROM? as your signature says: Send me device tree and I'll build the ROM. Why? To be more famous using other people's work? I don't get the point of anything here...
Oh, btw, where are the permissions to do that?
Thanks, Biel.
bieltv.3 said:
Well, I don't know which is the point of this thread. You are building my sources. You are making my ROM. Why create another thread? You don't have the device, me neither, but I started that project from 0. Why instead of making your CM7 you don't help us? Why don't you make a pull request? Do we need to talk with testers, which are the same for the both of us, to just test the same ROM!? If we want to have something big, we should focus on one CM and not building various CM7. I don't know which is the point of this, and I don't know what were you thinking. In your github there is 0 changes on my device tree. I committed all my changes during the last month and you used my work to build your own, and then it seems that your ROM is better than mine, because I don't release mid-done ROM's. I want to give the best expierence to all the users.
Also, I committed all the changes to help people understand on what I'm working. Many users asked me if I was really working on it, as I did not commit anything to github, but I was. And what happens if I commit? other users use my work to build their ROM's? I think that's not the way to go.
And what about a simple credit to the real author of this ROM? as your signature says: Send me device tree and I'll build the ROM. Why? To be more famous using other people's work? I don't get the point of anything here...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I am also starting the device tree from scratch. Is that alright?
I will suspend the current build and post a new one tomorrow which will based on my device trees.
About credits? I didnt even complete writing this thread..
About changes thing? I have made changes at my end which are not committed becuz I dont wanna put untested changes on github.
Sorry If I offended someone but I had no real intentions of doing that..
and btw.. I mean somehting else from my sign.. I want to help other device owners to get new roms to their device. Though it contradicts to this build.

[MOD][14 AUG] MultiROM v12

THIS OP IS OUTDATED! WIP!
Hello everybody!
You might or might not have already heard of MultiROM, THE multi-boot mod for the Nexus 7. I have recently found it and have decided to port it for our device.
First of all, it is a very initial release now. Though I have tested multiple cases and didn't find any problem except those in the bug list, bugs can arise. Do have a backup! Also, do read through the whole OP and 2nd post! If you don't understand something, rather read again and/or ask!
For more information on how it works and what it does, I suggest that you read the first few posts in the original thread. Those are very detailed and well-written posts that explain MultiROM in general. Installing roms to USB and Ubuntu/Ubuntu Touch of course doesn't work for our device atm.
Installation
The device must not be encrypted!
You need to flash the modified TWRP recovery that has MultiROM extensions. My version is based on the latest sources with gordon0001's device-specific modifications included. You can keep this recovery if you don't want to use MultiROM anymore and you like TWRP, because the MultiROM extensions don't interfere with other functions, even if the boot sector is not injected.
You have to flash a kernel that is capable of Kexec-hardboot. I compiled iodak's v07 CM kernel and official CM kernel with the patch, choose one of them. I have noticed an approx. 3 sec. vibration at boot with iodak, that's why I have included official CM kernel too.
Finally you have to flash MultiROM.
Links
You can find everything at http://d-h.st/users/Adam77Root/?fld_id=22980#files.
MultiROM_TWRP_X3.zip: The modified TWRP recovery from latest sources with gordon0001's device-specific changes and MultiROM support.
CM_kernel_patched.zip and iodakX3_v07CM_patched.zip: Official and iodak CM kernels with Kexec-hardboot patch.
iodakX3_v07_patched.zip: iodak stock kernel with Kexec-hardboot patch.
MultiROM_P880_v12.zip: The actual MultiROM package. Contains the latest version of Trampoline (the init binary of the system) and MultiROM binaries with all the needed device-specific changes. Even Pong works pretty smooth.
x3_hardboot.diff: Kexec-hardboot patch for 3.1.10 kernel.
mrom_p880.patch: Device-specific changes for Trampoline and MultiROM.
ui.xml: UI layout definition for TWRP for 720x1280 screens with MultiROM additions.
Known bugs
Reboot to recovery doesn't work.
USB tab doesn't do anything. This is because USB host mode (OTG) doesn't work on our device. Will reach out to kholk regarding this.
Sometimes in landscape mode, the default selected rom gets booted on the first touch. This is yet to be investigated.
Changelog
14 August 2013: Initial release
Credits
@Tasssadar for MultiROM, Kexec-hardboot for Nexus 7 and his help with debugging and porting
@mkasick for original Kexec-hardboot implementation
@iodak for his kernel
@gordon0001 for the device-specific TWRP modifications
Every custom modification to devices have risks. Flash these at your own risk!
Have fun and enjoy!
General use
Some notes and instructions regarding general use
For now, I have only provided patched 4.2.2 CM kernels. This means, you have to be on CM or CM-based rom with Android version 4.2.2. Don't try it with stock at the moment in any way. It won't work, but is on the to-do list. As Kexec-hardboot will reach out to devs, it will be supported in every rom ultimately.
In the next two examples, I will refer any official, unofficial, or CM-based roms as CM. Keep this in mind.
I use the word 'injected', because MultiROM is actually injected into the boot partition. It works on any kernel that is capable of doing Kexec-hardboot (and if you don't want to use different kernel (i.e. you will use kernel sharing), it will work on unpatched kernels as well).
I may refer to non-shared kernel method as Kexec(-hardboot) method.
Example scenario of multi-booting CM with CM and kernel sharing
You are on CM with MultiROM-capable recovery, patched kernel and MultiROM-injected and you want to install e.g. CarbonRom as second.
Boot into TWRP, navigate to Advanced->MultiROM and select 'Add ROM'. Since the base rom is CM, you can share the same kernel. It will be faster as there will be no hardboot needed.
The installation steps are easy and it doesn't take more time than a normal installation.
Example scenario of multi-booting CM with CM and different kernel
You are on CM with MultiROM-capable recovery, patched kernel and MultiROM-injected and you want to install e.g. CarbonRom as second.
Boot into TWRP, navigate to Advanced->MultiROM and select 'Add ROM'. Select 'Don't share'.
Continue with installation.
Now, since the target kernel (that is installed with the rom) is very likely not patched, you will have to flash one of my linked kernels to that rom. Do this by selecting 'List roms', selecting the desired rom, than 'Flash ZIP' and flashing one of the kernels I have patched.
You can only share the kernels between the same Android version (i.e. stock base->only stock rom can use shared kernel, 4.2 base->only 4.2 rom can use shared kernel, 4.3 base->only 4.3 rom can use shared kernel, etc.), but this is not the case with the Kexec method. Just keep in mind that for example even if your base rom is CM, for a stock secondary rom you have to flash a stock patched kernel.
The build
Some notes about the build
x3_hardboot.diff: This is the Kexec-hardboot patch for the 3.1.10 kernel. Since it is needed for target kernels as well, I would like to reach out in this post to @arararagi, @demetris_I, @iodak, @kholk, @laufersteppenwolf and @Pesach85 (in no particular order, this is how your threads are in order in Original Android Development forum right now). I and fellow users would be grateful if you could include the patch in the kernel so they can be used as both host and target kernels as well. UPDATE: It doesn't reserve one more megabyte before ram_console from now on.
mrom_p880.patch: This contains all the device-specific patches that are needed to get MultiROM booting and working on the P880. It is built on top of the latest git changes as of today. It also contains some comments about multiple devices compatibility, those are reminders for Tasssadar.
ui.xml: UI layout definition for TWRP for 720x1280 screens with MultiROM additions. Needs to be put into TWRPdir/gui/devices/720x1280/res/. The recovery I have created is based on the latest MultiROM TWRP with @gordon0001's device-specific changes.
You can find links to the upstream MultiROM and MultiROM TWRP in the original thread.
Simply incredible!!! :thumbup:thanks a lot man. I always wanted to try dualboot
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
Awaiting the Patched Stock Kernel to dual boot stock and AOSP Good Work man, hopefully @iodak will be able to patch his kernel by today so i can get modding :3
Nice work man! I have also seen hardboot kernels in the N7 section, but got into the hospital then....
But i will include it for sure when i'm back home
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
tnx for your very nice work
how i can flash twrp ?
i want to flash it on cwm but i cant
edite : thats my fault i am so sorry
penguin449 said:
Awaiting the Patched Stock Kernel to dual boot stock and AOSP Good Work man, hopefully @iodak will be able to patch his kernel by today so i can get modding :3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If anybody won't be faster, I will provide it tomorrow.
laufersteppenwolf said:
Nice work man! I have also seen hardboot kernels in the N7 section, but got into the hospital then....
But i will include it for sure when i'm back home
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! Take your time, rest and get better!
Sent from my LG-P880
Adam77Root said:
If anybody won't be faster, I will provide it tomorrow.
Sent from my LG-P880
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't get me wrong, i would be more then Happy to do it myself, however till my new PC Arrives i wont be able to use a Linux Distro for some time, if there's a method to do this on windows (Natively, can't even run anything in VM's) then point me in the right direction! Sorry for the inconvenience!
penguin449 said:
Don't get me wrong, i would be more then Happy to do it myself, however till my new PC Arrives i wont be able to use a Linux Distro for some time, if there's a method to do this on windows (Natively, can't even run anything in VM's) then point me in the right direction! Sorry for the inconvenience!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't get you wrong buddy. I have no problems with making a stock version, just didn't have time for that today.
Sent from my LG-P880
giantic hack
ohhh well the one big giantic hack is coming to our O4X! that`s very nice
thank you for this port and thank you for your fast work? tomorrow with stock and on saturday with android 4.3 ?
Donation sent
Whaaaaaattt?
Just were browsing N7 forum few days ago and saw MultiROM and thought "Ahh these lucky nexus guys, I wanna have it to! " and here we go hahahah
Sent from my OptimusX4HD using xda app-developers app
how can install rom to ext-sd ?
in next version can we have stock rom and miui rom or other custom rom?
tnx
Hey guys, heres iodak stock kernel with kexec patch: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ko752pu1akuvfzh/iodakX3_v07-realms.zip
Btw i theres a problem with the twrp zip package, im gonna try fastboot flash it. Has anyone had success?
Say Whut?
@Adam77Root, you just made me wanna flashing and flashing and flashing one day before I go into vacation, I will try to get some time today and test it!
Thanks so much!
Afro said:
Say Whut?
Adam77Root, you just made me wanna flashing and flashing and flashing one day before I go into vacation, I will try to get some time today and test it!
Thanks so much!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can flash 10 different roms and play with them over your vacation. Thats what vacations are right?
Hehe @JoinTheRealms , you understand me
Wow, I just saw your Iodak Stock Kernel with Kexec patch, verrry nice, now I can use Stock ROMs, too!
Did you already test it?
JoinTheRealms said:
Donation sent
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks very much!
m.homauon said:
how can install rom to ext-sd ?
in next version can we have stock rom and miui rom or other custom rom?
tnx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't install to external SD. It could be modified to allow it, but there would be a huge performance decrease. Literally, roms would be lagging too much.
JoinTheRealms said:
Hey guys, heres iodak stock kernel with kexec patch: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ko752pu1akuvfzh/iodakX3_v07-realms.zip
Btw i theres a problem with the twrp zip package, im gonna try fastboot flash it. Has anyone had success?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just was about to reply to your PM.
What kind of problem is with the zip package?
I will update the first posts in the afternoon.
Afro said:
Hehe @JoinTheRealms , you understand me
Wow, I just saw your Iodak Stock Kernel with Kexec patch, verrry nice, now I can use Stock ROMs, too!
Did you already test it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah i couldnt get the twrp package to flash so im gonna try with fastboot. But the kernel works, i just swapped the ramdisk from Adam77roots patched kernel with iodak's stock kernel, it should work though
---------- Post added at 07:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:19 PM ----------
Adam77Root said:
Just was about to reply to your PM.
What kind of problem is with the zip package?
I will update the first posts in the afternoon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My twrp failed to flash your twrp.zip package, most likely something on my end though, no one else has reported issues

Mourta Kernel, the continuation of IODAK's excellent work.

Featuring a new cpufreq interface, AbyssplugV2, intelliplug and a whole host of new additions that are not available in any other kernel for the x3.
Among them are updates only found in this kernel, saner defaults via config, better optimizations for the actual code and a rewritten version of devfreq.
It also have an updated baseband configuration and built in rather than to keep a module as it makes no sense to have a vital function as a module.
https://bitbucket.org/mourta/liquid_kernel_lge_p880-stable/
Kernel: http://www.mediafire.com/download/viy5a3dtaccd0gm/mourta-stable-08-23.zip
If there is a request for it i also have a ROM available based on grouper blobs, AD optimizations and a build around this kernel with a new dev tree.
For kernel install, it's anykernel, you can install it on any custom ROM, for stock and the lastest updates you will have to head over to Modaco and my original thread.
Note that this is a one time release, if you like it you'll have to head over to modaco to get updates.
it should be noted that the recommended settings is using intelliplug (you may need to use kernel tweaker or trickster mod for that if you're not running my ROM, and abyssplugv2, i also recommend ROW for a sheduler and Westwood for your congestion handling.
Note that you can now overclock to any frequency and it will feed the GPU chip with the needed volatage, this is great for cooking a roast beef but not for any practical use.
Quadrant scores are 8k and the last Antutu was at 16487, no overclocking but you won't reach that without using my ROM.
And with that... i'm done.
Thanks to the IODAK, Fransico, Adam77Root, Faux123 and others that provided code and/or input.
Oh, what I see here? The awesome kernel I'm testing with @ottomanhero and lucaarx and the great dev and friend @IcanhasLG coming back on xda? Let's rock hard&heavy, right now!
peppethustra said:
Oh, what I see here? The awesome kernel I'm testing with @ottomanhero and lucaarx and the great dev and friend @IcanhasLG coming back on xda? Let's rock hard&heavy, right now!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We'll see how this goes.
Thankfully i am in touch with a mod that will keep this drama free,
And for anyone wondering, peppethustra is head of my testing crew, you get stable releases because of them.
It should be noted that i'm still going to prefer the forum that greeted me over the one that shunned me from the get go, updates here will be sporadic at best but on time on the other forum.
It's great to see your work on XDA.Now everyone can experience your awesome work
P.S. you can find neccessary links in my signature
Great work, running your kernel now.
But Iodak was not updated since long ago and its sources does not contain many great fixes from cm11 kernel.
Thats why Demetris relased Cyodak kernel in Android development section. It's Iodak brought up to date with latest cm 11 kernel .
It would great to see Muorta Kernel based on Cyodak instead of old Iodak. We would have your exclusive features with up to date cm11 kernel upgrades. But maybe you already upgraded iodak's source, let us know
FunkyRasta said:
Great work, running your kernel now.
But Iodak was not updated since long ago and its sources does not contain many great fixes from cm11 kernel.
Thats why Demetris relased Cyodak kernel in Android development section. It's Iodak brought up to date with latest cm 11 kernel .
It would great to see Muorta Kernel based on Cyodak instead of old Iodak. We would have your exclusive features with up to date cm11 kernel upgrades. But maybe you already upgraded iodak's source, let us know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously, the real necessary updated patches have been implemented yet ("continuation" means this, too), so it's not necessary nor in Mourta's plans to base it on cyodak (which really isn't the only way to find updated code for our device)
peppethustra said:
Obviously, the real necessary updated patches have been implemented yet ("continuation" means this, too), so it's not necessary nor in Mourta's plans to base it on cyodak (which really isn't the only way to find updated code for our device)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I wanted to know, as OP didn't explicitly stated it. Thanks
FunkyRasta said:
That's what I wanted to know, as OP didn't explicitly stated it. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Outdated sources never are a good base for developing a fresh new kernel or ROM, if there is a new compatible code implementation ready to be merged into the code That's the first thing a good developer checks (and if you can, look at Mourta's bitbucket linked in the OP to view his commits, there will be all the principal news about new code implementations)
Tried this but I loose my modem every now and then and the screen won't wake sometimes.
baxtex said:
Tried this but I loose my modem every now and then and the screen won't wake sometimes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to Modaco and find newer version (26/8/2014) . It will resolve problems like yours
Okay will do.
How's the deep sleep ?
Written from my Optimus 4X powered by Omni 4.4
LGaljo said:
Go to Modaco and find newer version (26/8/2014) . It will resolve problems like yours
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this version, according to trickster mod, does not use deep sleep state and still screen won't wake up sometimes. so i dropped it for now.
greetings
peter
peter_altherr said:
this version, according to trickster mod, does not use deep sleep state and still screen won't wake up sometimes. so i dropped it for now.
greetings
peter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you give more info about your ROM, kernel settings, setup etc. and provide a logcat if possible? That's a rare issue you're having there.I've used my phone for 20 hours now, (%3 battery left) and it slept for about 15 hours, same version.
I suggest you to try flashing the kernel twice.I had such problems with iodak kernel back in the time and flashing it twice had fixed the deep sleep issue.
ottomanhero said:
Can you give more info about your ROM, kernel settings, setup etc. and provide a logcat if possible? That's a rare issue you're having there.I've used my phone for 20 hours now, (%3 battery left) and it slept for about 15 hours, same version.
I suggest you to try flashing the kernel twice.I had such problems with iodak kernel back in the time and flashing it twice had fixed the deep sleep issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
@peter_altherr And more important thing: have you at least wiped cache and dalvik before flashing the kernel? If yes, try wiping system partition too (no factory reset, you can leave /data partiton intact) then reflash ROM, gapps and kernel, and see how it goes..wait 3 or 4 minutes before trying to wake up device, after the first boot, and deep sleep would start without problems
I have tried the 26/8 version but that still gives me RIL problems, I get no signal whatsoever. I cannot grab a logcat as I need my phone to work right now but I'm Running latest beanstalk version.
baxtex said:
I have tried the 26/8 version but that still gives me RIL problems, I get no signal whatsoever. I cannot grab a logcat as I need my phone to work right now but I'm Running latest beanstalk version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait for next version, great changes will come even about this issue
@peter_altherr you should unplug it from charger and try unplugged.
when charging cpu never reaching deepsleep.
@ whoever had freeze/sod problems with last kernel version: a new fixed release has been uploaded (it's a minor release: reverted GPU OC, which was causing the problem). Check official thread for the download link
my phone does not see SD card with 0902
and yes im 100% sure its kernel problem....recovery sees my sd, and so iodak kernel

[Q&A] [KERNEL][AOSP 4.4.4|CAF][UNIFIED ghost | moto_msm8960dt][TDHK 10/05/2014]

Q&A for [KERNEL][AOSP 4.4.4|CAF][UNIFIED ghost | moto_msm8960dt][TDHK 10/05/2014]
Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer. Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy! :smile:
So this won't work with vzw xt1060 stock rom unlocked BL?
Nope..its made for aosp Roms based off of CM
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Free mobile app
When install de kernel, aptoide doesn't work anymore... I try to open and then close alone. Sorry for my english. I use de liquid ROM and work fine with default kernel, but i flash this and doesn't work anymore.
AnshRosenberg said:
When install de kernel, aptoide doesn't work anymore... I try to open and then close alone. Sorry for my english. I use de liquid ROM and work fine with default kernel, but i flash this and doesn't work anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you get this fixed up. If not I'll get you set. A great many people are using the kernel across a lot of ROMS so likely it'll work.
tdhite said:
Did you get this fixed up. If not I'll get you set. A great many people are using the kernel across a lot of ROMS so likely it'll work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had to install a nandroid of the ROM I was using, to get back to the old kernel . yet still not work for me the Aptoide when you used to and is giving me error in the camera application and stops , so I will try to reinstall everything from 0 and see if it works with the kernel stock and try again with this kernel and see if it stops me working again , if you work then it is not kernel problem , but if i happens again I will have to return to report the error or maybe it's something else that I am installed causing this conflict but I doubt it because I install very basic things ...
AnshRosenberg said:
I had to install a nandroid of the ROM I was using, to get back to the old kernel . yet still not work for me the Aptoide when you used to and is giving me error in the camera application and stops , so I will try to reinstall everything from 0 and see if it works with the kernel stock and try again with this kernel and see if it stops me working again , if you work then it is not kernel problem , but if i happens again I will have to return to report the error or maybe it's something else that I am installed causing this conflict but I doubt it because I install very basic things ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This kernel will only work with ROMS based on AOSP. If Aptoide is a stock rom, or anything other than AOSP, forget the effort. It will not work.
So this kernel is compatible with CM12 nightlies coming out at the moment, or am i wrong?
Cassini-Huygens said:
So this kernel is compatible with CM12 nightlies coming out at the moment, or am i wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll post a LP version tomorrow. it's working fine. The current is kitkat.
Amazing kernel indeed, only thing missing is RGB color correction, because of purple-ish color on low brightnes settings. Keep on good work!
I'm using Battery by Macropinch to monitor amperage. The latest kernel using the smartmax governor, I'm happy to report, is dipping into the 100mA range quite frequently with wifi and LTE on using the the 1-15-2015 cm12 build. I was getting upset that my cheap Huawei Y536A1 LTE phone was hitting this range on stock and lasting two days on a single charge and my Moto X was staying in the 400-500mA without even touching it, but now I think I think this is a good early indication that we can be seeing good idle and casual use power drain on the moto x. Cheers!
PS: I never post, I didn't mean to post this in the Q&A section. How do I delete it?
is double tap to wake coming?
690sid said:
is double tap to wake coming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, it's in the kernel I last uploaded, just fails to keep the touchscreen alive. Once I fix that, we'll have it. Give me a week -- very busy with work.
tdhite said:
Actually, it's in the kernel I last uploaded, just fails to keep the touchscreen alive. Once I fix that, we'll have it. Give me a week -- very busy with work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okay man... really appreciate your work.
Wanted to ask, is there a way to temporarily deal with the memory leak of lollipop using the kernel?
i have moto x sprint UBL. and now I use cm12 5.02 nightly
does this kernel works for me?
thx
redo777 said:
i have moto x sprint UBL. and now I use cm12 5.02 nightly
does this kernel works for me?
thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can confirm this kernel works as a sweety on cm12 and on ! For battery wise settings of this kernel I recommend smartmax.
Is this the only android 5 compatible kernel we have , us the ghost ppl .. ?
---------- Post added at 12:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 AM ----------
Can we hope to see an update any time soon ?
ban.codrut said:
Can we hope to see an update any time soon ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Posted. Check the dev thread Downloads post.
work on cm12
hi can i flash this kernel in cm12 ?
great
Running on candy5 (ghost) with sweetener, droid maxx xt1080 rooted and unlocked! Everything is running great so far, I'll give you some feedback in a few days! Thanks for all the hard work!
help
I have this Kernel (20/7) on my Ressurection Remix. Who is the best configuration to save battery ? I need to know :
- Best CPU Governor
- Best CPU Voltage
-Best GPU Governor
- Etc
Really Thanks. Any help is great.

gpl | abyss kernel 5.10 | cm-14.x/cm-13.x

Hi titan people!
This is my modified kernel with some kernel optimizations and some compiler optimizations.
The goal of abyss is to achieve improved performance/battery without the cost of stability.
I will not be overhauling this project with changes that are not logical to add.
This kernel should work on the latest 7.x.x and maybe 6.x.x roms like CyanogenMod and any other AOSP based rom.
Source links lead to my falcon source because they share the same source
How does one achieve such a compromise?
- build kernel with an optimized toolchain
- use compiler optimization flags (experimental)
- remove redundant code
- improve existing code with more efficient code
- reduce/increase speed of timers (depends on what type of function)
- etc. (most are not easy to explain)
This kernel is built with Linaro GCC 4.9.4 that is optimized for Cortex A7 processors.
Is there actually a performance improvement?
With all the changes added up, there should be. Whether or not one notices the difference is another thing.
Personally, I do feel the performance difference. It is easier to notice the difference with lower level specs like ours.
For those interested in how the kernel optimizations will benefit/work, please look at my github source and read the commit messages.
For those interested in how the compiler optimizations/hacks will benefit/work, please look at this article.
Downloads:
Latest build
BasketBuild
Source:
GitHub
I do not mind if there's some non-development/off-topic discussion here, just no discussion about other works that is nowhere near related to mine.
Also, please refrain from comparing works here; it really kills the spirit of development. Go do that in some other thread.
XDA:DevDB Information
abyss kernel for aosp roms, Kernel for the Moto G 2014
Contributors
YoshiShaPow, arter97, flar2, Christopher83, Cl3Kener, frap129
Source Code: https://github.com/abyss-kernels/falcon
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Nightly
Created 2016-05-14
Last Updated 2016-12-09
Main Patches and Features:
- KCAL Control Driver
- kexec hardboot patch for Multirom
- USB Force Fast Charge
- Abyss Optimizations (compiler)
- disabled debugging for more performance throughout
- lots of patches for better performance here and there... too many to list
How to install:
Download kernel from Basketbuild
Boot into TWRP recovery
(If you're coming from a different kernel, dirty flash current ROM)
Flash kernel zip
Reboot
Don't like the defaults?
Use Kernel Adiutor to change the settings!
Frequently Asked Questions:
Is this a custom kernel?
I was asked this question once, and it posed as a real good question. I do not consider abyss kernel to be a "custom kernel" per se, but more so as a modified kernel. The patches and features that go into this kernel do not make it customizable. What they do is improve what has already been implemented. It is like swapping a car's engine for a better one rather than just adding LED flooring lights and fancy car mats.
Can you add [this] and [that] feature?
Something I pride myself with this kernel is that it does not have a bunch of random, useless features or patches mashed into it. Everything put into this kernel is thought out well and tested. I see a lot of works being made popular because it has [this] and [that] feature when really, it's nothing revolutionary. As a matter of fact, most things added to any kernel will not make it 5x better than any other kernel. Most of the time, simple is better; and in this case it definitely is!
First
I'll test
Do you have any preferred settings to tweak the kernel or does it come tweaked out of the box? Thank you.
Ashok Menon 101 said:
Do you have any preferred settings to tweak the kernel or does it come tweaked out of the box? Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything is good to go after flashing. The most you could do is increase the Read-ahead size to 258kB or 384kB but there's really no point; it won't do much.
YoshiShaPow said:
Everything is good to go after flashing. The most you could do is increase the Read-ahead size to 258kB or 384kB but there's really no point; it won't do much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, thank you.
Which ROM do you think is the best for this btw? No offence to anyone. I understand that egg-caf goes with everything but which do you prefer? Thank you.
Ashok Menon 101 said:
Alright, thank you.
Which ROM do you think is the best for this btw? No offence to anyone. I understand that egg-caf goes with everything but which do you prefer? Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My current setup is Exodus 6.0 and egg-caf kernel. Sometimes I forget that I'm using a phone (Moto G 2013) that costs less than $200 USD.
New build with modified values; it should improve multitasking performance.
egg-caf-titan-nightly-20160515.zip
YoshiShaPow said:
..... I do not mind if there's some non-development/off-topic discussion here, just no discussion about other works that is nowhere near related to mine.
Also, please refrain from comparing works here; it really kills the spirit of development. Go do that in some other thread. ......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As you kindly allow some non-development/off-topic discussion I´d like to ask a question about kernel flashing.
You write in your installing explanation
Boot into TWRP recovery
(If you're coming from a different kernel, dirty flash current ROM)
It´s a thing I often heard before. As an example: When I´m coming from a different kernel (I flashed a custom rom and then changed the kernel) and want to go back to the "stock" one why isn´t it enough to unzip my custom rom and flash the boot.img inside?
Where is the difference to dirty flash the whole rom?
Thx in advance.
Wolfcity said:
As you kindly allow some non-development/off-topic discussion I´d like to ask a question about kernel flashing.
You write in your installing explanation
Boot into TWRP recovery
(If you're coming from a different kernel, dirty flash current ROM)
It´s a thing I often heard before. As an example: When I´m coming from a different kernel (I flashed a custom rom and then changed the kernel) and want to go back to the "stock" one why isn´t it enough to unzip my custom rom and flash the boot.img inside?
Where is the difference to dirty flash the whole rom?
Thx in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your question is not even close to what I mean when I say off-topic :highfive: (it is on-topic). Some kernel developers add scripts, patches, ramdisk modifications, etc in their zips to tune different types of values. The easiest way to get rid of all of that is by dirty flashing the rom, which replaces the /system partition and ramdisk with fresh ones from the dirty flash.
YoshiShaPow said:
Your question is not even close to what I mean when I say off-topic :highfive: (it is on-topic). Some kernel developers add scripts, patches, ramdisk modifications, etc in their zips to tune different types of values. The easiest way to get rid of all of that is by dirty flashing the rom, which replaces the /system partition and ramdisk with fresh ones from the dirty flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for your fast reply and good to know that my question was on topic.[emoji6] Some devs are very delicate when someone hijacks their thread.
Your answer declares the other files, that can be found in some flashable zip kernels.
Is there something to pay attention of when dirty flashing the same ROM again? Ok,don't wipe data is a clear thing but I think of unmounting partitions etc to don't mess up.
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Wolfcity said:
Thx for your fast reply and good to know that my question was on topic.[emoji6] Some devs are very delicate when someone hijacks their thread.
Your answer declares the other files, that can be found in some flashable zip kernels.
Is there something to pay attention of when dirty flashing the same ROM again? Ok,don't wipe data is a clear thing but I think of unmounting partitions etc to don't mess up.
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Roms updater script will mount the partitions it needs. Just make sure after flashing that you wipe cache and dalvik/art cache. Most gapps have a backup script that prevent it from being removed during dirty flashes. If your gapps are retained, you know you've done it correctly.
YoshiShaPow said:
The Roms updater script will mount the partitions it needs. Just make sure after flashing that you wipe cache and dalvik/art cache. Most gapps have a backup script that prevent it from being removed during dirty flashes. If your gapps are retained, you know you've done it correctly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If someone (a friend oft mine or my cat, not me!) [emoji41] has deleted this backup script because he thought he doesn't need it anymore I think he has to flash gapps again too?
Thx for making things more clear and reminding me not to delete files flippantly.
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Wolfcity said:
If someone (a friend oft mine or my cat, not me!) [emoji41] has deleted this backup script because he thought he doesn't need it anymore I think he has to flash gapps again too?
Thx for making things more clear and reminding me not to delete files flippantly.
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you will need to flash gapps again. Make sure that if you still have the backup script to not reflash gapps because I've had conflicts with that before. Not very fun.
YoshiShaPow said:
New build with modified values; it should improve multitasking performance.
egg-caf-titan-nightly-20160515.zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
always good to test the new features! downloading :laugh: :victory:
Answer me a question, why should change decipher kernel for egg-caf kernel?
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA-Developers mobile app
DeluxeMark said:
Answer me a question, why should change decipher kernel for egg-caf kernel?
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you should choose:
Decipher: stable,enough features, battery.
Egg: Stable, no extra features, performance.
Performance is much better with egg than decipher.
But in terms of battery, decipher is the clear winner.
I've been using the egg kernel for a few days now with cm13 and it's good enough for me.
Performance is really good. I don't really care about the battery as I always have a charger with me always so I don't really mind.
Overall, egg kernel is pretty good.
DeluxeMark said:
Answer me a question, why should change decipher kernel for egg-caf kernel?
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about you answer me this.
OP said:
Also, please refrain from comparing works here; it really kills the spirit of development. Go do that in some other thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does one get people to not do something in a thread? Back in the older days, that would be by writing something boldly in the OP. Guess that does not work anymore.
Honestly, you can do whatever the heck you want anywhere else, just not in my thread where I have my posting guidelines set.
Edit: also, I clearly state what is different in my kernel from others in the OP
It was just a question,not a comparison
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA-Developers mobile app

Categories

Resources