Database Develop

Galaxy Note beats Optimus 4x hd in quadrant :(

I guess the Tegra 3 isn't optimized for old 3d apps and benchmarks, as the 4x hd lost to a modded Galaxy Note...
Video here on youtube... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSUIg_mDE-Q&feature=player_embedded

Dont know if you get different results everytime you run this Quadrant test, but my 4x got 4746 points, better then One X....
Suppose its up to the phone, if it have a good day or a bad day

This occurs only when the update was made on v10b with V10a results 5000 and more!
ds7005
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

quadrant, shmadrant - synthetic benchmark's are not 100% real picture you will get using phone in life. never believed these ****-tests...

ch3 said:
quadrant, shmadrant - synthetic benchmark's are not 100% real picture you will get using phone in life. never believed these ****-tests...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, seems like its just bull****...
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

Hendrickson said:
I guess the Tegra 3 isn't optimized for old 3d apps and benchmarks, as the 4x hd lost to a modded Galaxy Note...
Video here on youtube... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSUIg_mDE-Q&feature=player_embedded
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its no problem to get my quadrant scores hit 10.000 on o4x, and it looks amazing but all it does it use some faster memory which quadrant is not prepared for. (asus Prime can show 10.000+)
so forget testing and comparing models using quadrant, you can easily mod or change scores and especially when its about cpu changes in the kernel, there is alot of optimization and apps changing you can do to improve for a few 100 points more.
tweaking and making quadrant scores show some speedup might not be speedy at all.

AnTuTu is a better test, the Optimus 4x doubles the scores of the Note.
I wonder what LG did to make the phone slower in v10b firmware?

i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-42-25.png
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-48-06.png
same with op
whats wrong with my phone
v10a

meld said:
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-42-25.png
i1132.photobucket.com/albums/m571/randours/Screenshot_2012-07-11-18-48-06.png
same with op
whats wrong with my phone
v10a
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange results you have there
V10B - Result in Screenshot

ch3 said:
Strange results you have there
V10B - Result in Screenshot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How to update to v10b?
Anyone have same problem with v10a?
And btw i play Temple run and fruit ninja a bit laggy + stutter
Anyone have some problem?

meld said:
How to update to v10b?
Anyone have same problem with v10a?
And btw i play Temple run and fruit ninja a bit laggy + stutter
Anyone have some problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 10B Over The Air.
Temple Run / Fruit Ninja - no shuttering.

ch3 said:
I got 10B Over The Air.
Temple Run / Fruit Ninja - no shuttering.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pc suite?
I use that, but no notif and cant click software update
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1191477&stc=1&d=1342023053

Does it really matter guys ?
I own a Galaxy Note and certainly don't feel like gloating....to me it all depends upon whether you like your phone or not, these tests can be tweaked and maybe with custom roms and optimizations you can get a much better score.
That's just what I believe.

I own both phones, and the note feels faster. Yet the antutu benchmarks tells me its not. I think once we get root on the 4x hd and then custom roms with all the junk removed this phones going to be a beast. Maybe we need 4.1 jellybean to really take advantage of the 4 cores.

Hendrickson said:
I own both phones, and the note feels faster. Yet the antutu benchmarks tells me its not. I think once we get root on the 4x hd and then custom roms with all the junk removed this phones going to be a beast. Maybe we need 4.1 jellybean to really take advantage of the 4 cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get scores in the 3500 in Quadrant. The rest of the benchmarks however show consistent scores with a quadcore device. The phone itself feels very snapy so i find no issues with low scores in quadrant

score
quadrant result - 5073
phone is rooted

hello gentlemen,
I had the same issue.. first test - and only 3038... (unrooted, 10h, few days w/out reboot)
but after reboot and kill any batterystats, cpumetters, etc.. back to normality with 5167 -
Regards,

daniel.wro said:
hello gentlemen,
I had the same issue.. first test - and only 3038... (unrooted, 10h, few days w/out reboot)
---
but after reboot and kill any batterystats, cpumetters, etc.. back to normality with 5167 -
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should not be surprised, hopefully.
since android works this way, and o4x got alot of memory for hungry apps wanting to stay in memory and do alot of things.
thats why apps like taskkiller is very efficient to have installed and run automatically so you keep your unrebooted phone snappier all the time.
a few days without taskkiller and it might just get very slow if you open many different apps.
nothing special about that. it depends on the user not the phone.

Antutu score 5.1

I just updated like 2 hours ago, installed a few apps got root and twrp on it.
Installed antutu just to check the score and wow a score i got with encrypted on.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My score on 5.0.1 was 43k which i thought was ok but this new score with many apps installed and 10+ in recent was not bad at all.
What a snappy beast i got, much better then what i got when it was released!

thats a normal score on a nexus 6, 5.0, 5.01, 5.02, or 5.1. it hasnt changed. your score of 43000 was just a very low score to begin with.

simms22 said:
thats a normal score on a nexus 6, 5.0, 5.01, 5.02, or 5.1. it hasnt changed. your score of 43000 was just a very low score to begin with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well 43k was my score when i brought the device with 5.0 on it.
To me this is a huge step forward, also the performance of the device is much better now.

Android-Desire said:
Well 43k was my score when i brought the device with 5.0 on it.
To me this is a huge step forward, also the performance of the device is much better now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i was seeing 53000+ on 5.0, stock. your 43000 score was a very very low nexus 6 score. 53000+ is the normal score for a nexus 6, regardless of what your score was before. i bet it was so low because youre benchmarking it wrong. if your cpu is set to max cpu speed and min cpu speed, then thats the wrong way to bench. as your phone then decides what speed itll use. youre supposed to set your cpu speed for max cpu/max cpu, so it only tests your max cpu speed, so it will only give you your highest scores. otherwise, you have no idea what cpu speed its actually testing. obviously 43000 it wasnt testing your max cpu speed.

simms22 said:
i was seeing 53000+ on 5.0, stock. your 43000 score was a very very low nexus 6 score. 53000+ is the normal score for a nexus 6, regardless of what your score was before. i bet it was so low because youre benchmarking it wrong. if your cpu is set to max cpu speed and min cpu speed, then thats the wrong way to bench. as your phone then decides what speed itll use. youre supposed to set your cpu speed for max cpu/max cpu, so it only tests your max cpu speed, so it will only give you your highest scores. otherwise, you have no idea what cpu speed its actually testing. obviously 43000 it wasnt testing your max cpu speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
43k was stock without any modifications to cpu kernel or anything that should interfer with the benchmark, same as this screenie. stock settings all the way.
Why is it everytime i post something here that all people take it like this is my first time using an android phone? I have build roms before - 2.3.4 on HTC Desire - 2.3.4 on LG Optimus 2x and a cupcake 1.5 rom for a huawei and i have also build 5.0 aosp for this Nexus 6.
My experience with this device at 43k was when i was omw home with only antutu installed on phone and not even connected it to pc yet.

I think what he is saying is other people, like myself, got in the fifties with a standard stock 5. 0 device.
If it really was a per device issue then I would think I would get in the sixties on 5.1 , but I don't think that's going to happen. i. e. you going from 5 .0 to 5. 1 did not jump your stats up by 10k.
But I am glad to hear it resolved your issues.
Sent from my Nexus 6

Android-Desire said:
43k was stock without any modifications to cpu kernel or anything that should interfer with the benchmark, same as this screenie. stock settings all the way.
Why is it everytime i post something here that all people take it like this is my first time using an android phone? I have build roms before - 2.3.4 on HTC Desire - 2.3.4 on LG Optimus 2x and a cupcake 1.5 rom for a huawei and i have also build 5.0 aosp for this Nexus 6.
My experience with this device at 43k was when i was omw home with only antutu installed on phone and not even connected it to pc yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, you were doing something wrong then, whatever it was. 43000 is a nexus 5 antutu score, lol. btw, me, and everyone i know with a nexus 6 hit 53000+ on stock, while still stock. btw, just because you can build a rom, doesnt mean that you know everything android, as simple noobs can build aosp from source, and add things to it.

43k is low. I normally get around 55k.
I've had 34k before that was because the battery was low and limiting the cpu speed.

Not sure how a discussion of Nationality started in a phone benchmark thread? Either way, it is unneeded and removed. Please stop.
Back to talking about meaningless numbers now....

Simm is correct - 53k is average for stock unrooted.
I can get this on my wife's phone all day without trying.

Mine did the reverse. On 5.01 I was at 53k. On 5.1 I am at 36k.

El Daddy said:
Not sure how a discussion of Nationality started in a phone benchmark thread? Either way, it is unneeded and removed. Please stop.
Back to talking about meaningless numbers now....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause that is how they are always.
You must be able to see it from his post, he is assuming this is my first time with technology, and talking down to me like i have lived in a cave somewhere and got this created account date by accident.

Just to add a bit of confirmation (on one side) to this thread, I never got into the 50s on my stock nexus 6 until I removed encryption from the device and switched kernels. My values were consistent with what has been posted. I'm not sure how you can run Antutu wrong on a stock, unrooted, and locked bootloader device, unless you're running it while it's charging or when the battery is dead. I did neither and was scoring in the mid 40s.

For some reason I'm getting scores of around 44,000 in stock 5.1 (rooted). Prior to flashing 5.1 I was getting around 52,000. Antutu's 3D tests aren't looking as smooth as they were before, either.
This is with stock 5.1 kernel.
Edit: OK, how silly of me. Now that I've actually tested it on a fuller battery I'm getting low 50s again.

OP5 - Benchmark cheating!

Hi all!
See this news article: https://www.xda-developers.com/oneplus-5-benchmark-cheating-reviews/
Long story short - all cores on a test device were bumped to max performance (and stayed there) whenever a benchmark app was run.
This was done by identifying the app name (package name). Very simple and crude implementation.
Graph of performance when running a custom build app with no identifiers:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Same when running standard apps with regular identifiers present (the phone is now cheating):
**** move OnePlus! Still ordered the phone though :fingers-crossed:

Are you sure this is called cheating? It's really the max performance of the phone, and it doesn't overclock itself. And yeah, it's a bad move to identify those apps, but I wouldn't call it cheating.

The article suggests its cheating, thats there wording Personally i partly agree with you though. But locking at max is not every day behaviour

Have OP learned nothing?!

I can care less about the benchmarks. I care about smoothness and ram management. I hope it is better than my Pixel XL. Time will tell.
Sent from my Pixel XL using XDA-Developers Legacy app

The 3T was one of the best android experiences I have ever had. I'm looking forward to receiving my Oneplus 5

Agree benchmarks are not important in everyday life, or actually not even when choosing phone.
Sent from my NEM-L21 using XDA Labs

i ordered OP5 right after the launch event.. and i couldnt care less for the benchmark scores..
yet, this is cheating..
i dont think most people want to know how the device performs at its peak before burning itself.. instead actual real-life performance is the focus..
it (the "cheat") gives false impression/expectation on performance to those non-techie people with non-normal/in-lab-only usage pattern..
and if you think this is not cheating, why not apply it to all use cases instead of only target at particular benchmark apps, if its such a wonderful behaviour to have?

Battery Life Only Benchmark that Matters
Since the 801 -- which still speeds along my 1+1 plenty fast for me -- I typically skip all the benchmark scores (boring!) and look for the one thing that matters most to me -- the battery life experienced by the reviewer. And according to ArsTech*, the battery life on the 1+5 is stellar!
* https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/06/oneplus-5-review-the-best-sub-500-phone-you-can-buy/2/

Who cares? Does it affect your use of the phone? No. Does it make oneplus look bad? Yes.

Benchmark
Just done a benchmark rated top

Cheating? Is a Volkswagen Diesel inside?
Sorry.. couldn´t resist.

I don't get it, why this is cheating? I want to know what the hardware is capable of. Even if all time max frequency is not daily usable.

oVeRdOsE. said:
I don't get it, why this is cheating? I want to know what the hardware is capable of. Even if all time max frequency is not daily usable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because every other phone doesn't do it so you get a false benchmark score for OP compared to others.

Batfink33 said:
Because every other phone doesn't do it so you get a false benchmark score for OP compared to others.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
makes sense.
But this phone still showing hardware benchmarking, I mean they don't edit the software to change the numbers.
If other phone makers don't do this, well I understand.
But in theory with a custom kernel, and cpu governer, it's possible to max out the cpu/gpu and using the phone like so. with 30 min of battery...

oVeRdOsE. said:
makes sense.
But this phone still showing hardware benchmarking, I mean they don't edit the software to change the numbers.
If other phone makers don't do this, well I understand.
But in theory with a custom kernel, and cpu governer, it's possible to max out the cpu/gpu and using the phone like so. with 30 min of battery...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The cheating is something other phone makers have done before. Samsung did it a few years ago but stopped when they were found out. One Plus have been found out and continued to do it, Google have even called them out on it and told them to stop. They're maxing the CPU to give an inflated benchmark result and make them top of the benchmark scores.

OnePlus is a bunch of developers that got together and made their own phone right? Soooooo is it a surprise they bumped the scores a little? Who freakin cares it's an awesome phone. (I'd prolly not be as pleased if I had the jelly scrolling issue that is "normal"......)

I'll never understand this "cheating" nonsense...benchmarking a computer or any type of technology's CPU/GPU, etc was done to gauge the potential of that hardware. When people go to sites like 3dmark and look at the leader charts, those PCs are overclocked beyond your wildest imagination using things like liquid nitrogen and dry ice...the video cards are striped of their stock coolers and have exotic water cooling blocks installed.....if you simply wanted to benchmark something at it's basic stock speed, the scores would literally be the same across every product using that CPU/GPU...what's the point? OP sets their phone to go to max performance when benchmarking and it's cheating?? Samsung used to get cherry picked Snapdragons in the past that were able to clock higher than the rated spec safely...is that cheating? If OP clocked the Snapdragon 835 higher than it's rated spec out of the box, would that be considered cheating? Are all the millions of enthusiasts who overclock their PCs to achieve the highest possible score in 3dmark also cheating?

All in all, this article tells us about just how good Oneplus 5 optimizations happen to be. When the Cupertino phone company can drive the heck out of optimizations between each of their software & hardware components we should thank that at least there now is an Android phone team that does the same.
Plus the Benchmarks are not there to imitate real life usage, they are there to see how well software and hardware components are intertwined to pull up a Score based on performance. Real life usage can only be perceived by a real life usage and in that department OnePlus 5 is second to None Literally.

Not really. Any phone manufacturer could easily do the same thing here (increase clock speeds when benchmarks are detected). There's nothing really being "optimized" by OnePlus.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

General Post your Antutu!

I make the start!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
if you have made any tuning,share it with us so that we can all improve our beast!

Here's mine. I have most battery intensive options on though, like 120 fps and such.

Bananablob debloated?

Yes, on latest MIUI Mix. I'm debloated in the sense that the rom is pre debloated itself.
Also, I'd be surprised if a few bloatwares would reduce a performance score that much.
What adjustments do you suggest ?

vagenrider said:
I make the start!
View attachment 5403917View attachment 5403919
if you have made any tuning,share it with us so that we can all improve our beast!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a big difference between you and the other user, your scores seem coming from different devices lol. What is your set-up?
I found out that AnTuTu is not longer on play store, where can I download it?

From their website: http://www.antutu.com/en/index.htm
It seems down for me rn though

I'm downloading right now I'll post the results soon

Very bad result for me, weekly Xiaomi EU on Mi 11 Ultra global

xNAPx said:
There is a big difference between you and the other user, your scores seem coming from different devices lol. What is your set-up?
I found out that AnTuTu is not longer on play store, where can I download it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your browser is not able to display this video.
I can not understand why such a big difference..i have china version and i made just a good adb debloat because no have root acsess yet due to unlock time limit and with no activities and backround process on dev settings

I didn't get as much as everyone else but I have a lot of apps installed and running I don't really want to turn off....

vagenrider said:
I make the start!
View attachment 5403917View attachment 5403919
if you have made any tuning,share it with us so that we can all improve our beast!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
840k is a great score
Is that out of the box or overclocked ?

speedtripler said:
840k is a great score
Is that out of the box or overclocked ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah,its pretty good.just a china mi 11 ultra without root,actualy waiting the timer to unlock.only some dev settings tuning/debloat

speedtripler said:
I didn't get as much as everyone else but I have a lot of apps installed and running I don't really want to turn off....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very nice score mate.mine is almost empty about apps.i got it just before 3 days

vagenrider said:
I make the start!
View attachment 5403917View attachment 5403919
if you have made any tuning,share it with us so that we can all improve our beast!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how long was the phone? if recently purchased without not much apps probably can get this much. other user should probably get around 750k which is fine.

amirulez.com said:
how long was the phone? if recently purchased without not much apps probably can get this much. other user should probably get around 750k which is fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree mate,just 3 days

Ah you are on China ROM, I was suspecting that , China ROM is the fastest. I'm looking forward to move to it. I'm on Xiaomi EU which really lack in performance

xNAPx said:
Ah you are on China ROM, I was suspecting that , China ROM is the fastest. I'm looking forward to move to it. I'm on Xiaomi EU which really lack in performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah and I have read from many users that it is much faster than the Eu version and I see it myself these 3 days that I have it..I come from asus rog 3 which is a very strong phone but I see mi 11 ultra is even faster in whatever I am doing

This phone really rocks in China, it is a shame global version doesn't get the same treatment. Well I really want to flash the official China ROM, unfortunately I won't be able to until next week when I finally have access to my pc

Does the Chinese rom include all languages like German?

Afg Playa said:
Does the Chinese rom include all languages like German?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, Chinese or English

General Lower benchmark scores than the normal for my Redmi Note 11 6GB/64GB variant.

I have the Redmi Note 11 6GB/64GB variant (bought it less than a week ago). I got to doing some benchmarking of my phone. I first checked the benchmark scores for my device on various sites and YouTube videos.
First, the Geek Bench 5 scores should be (according to YT reviewers' videos and other websites) around 364 for single core and 1500 for multi core . My device's score was 171 for single core and 911 for multicore.
Then I performed the AnTuTu benchmark and the scores should be around 270k but my score was 173847. Now that's a lot of difference, I wouldn't mind if the score was like 220k or something but 270k to 170k is a lot of difference.
I performed the benchmark tests in the first place because I was facing lag even while using Instagram and scrolling through WhatsApp and Telegram, I have restarted my device several times, the free RAM is always around or more than 3GB, I don't have many apps installed either. I have more than 50% of my storage free, nothing heavy was running in background while testing either. I don't play heavy games or stuff but I at least want my daily use experience to be smooth, what's the point if I can't even scroll Instagram without facing lags?
Here are the screenshots of the scores from Geek Bench and AnTuTu.
I'm extremely dissatisfied with this, should I get a replacement? I'm not really sure if the issue is with my device's hardware or it's MIUI's fault. If it's the latter then I'm ready to flash a custom rom to my phone if it will fix the issue. What could be the problem? Any help is appreciated.

_voldemort_with_a_nose_ said:
I have the Redmi Note 11 6GB/64GB variant (bought it less than a week ago). I got to doing some benchmarking of my phone. I first checked the benchmark scores for my device on various sites and YouTube videos.
First, the Geek Bench 5 scores should be (according to YT reviewers' videos and other websites) around 364 for single core and 1500 for multi core . My device's score was 171 for single core and 911 for multicore.
Then I performed the AnTuTu benchmark and the scores should be around 270k but my score was 173847. Now that's a lot of difference, I wouldn't mind if the score was like 220k or something but 270k to 170k is a lot of difference.
I performed the benchmark tests in the first place because I was facing lag even while using Instagram and scrolling through WhatsApp and Telegram, I have restarted my device several times, the free RAM is always around or more than 3GB, I don't have many apps installed either. I have more than 50% of my storage free, nothing heavy was running in background while testing either. I don't play heavy games or stuff but I at least want my daily use experience to be smooth, what's the point if I can't even scroll Instagram without facing lags?
Here are the screenshots of the scores from Geek Bench and AnTuTu.
I'm extremely dissatisfied with this, should I get a replacement? I'm not really sure if the issue is with my device's hardware or it's MIUI's fault. If it's the latter then I'm ready to flash a custom rom to my phone if it will fix the issue. What could be the problem? Any help is appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same problem

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
thats the 4/64 variant of mine
also the LTE speeds are trash

Raider0001 said:
View attachment 5580313
thats the 4/64 variant of mine
also the LTE speeds are trash
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya the LTE speeds are somewhat slower on this phone. At my home, on my Pixel 4a I get 20-40 Mbps with Airtel 4G, but on Redmi note 11 I get around 15-30 Mbps. It never cross 30 and reach 40 like pixel 4a.
I have the 6GB/64GB variant.
Also slower WIFI speeds. I have a BSNL Fiber wifi at home. Its just 2.4 Ghz but my pixel 4a reach speed upto 90-100 Mbps, whereas Note 11 never cross 50 Mbps. I know Note 11 will give faster speeds with 5Ghz wifi, but sill if pixel can reach 100mbps with 2.5ghz wifi then Note 11 should have been able to reach those speeds too.
Anyways, 50Mbps wifi and 30Mbps LTE speed is enough for me. So no complaints. LTE speed increases to 50-60mbps when I am in good network coverge area.

it fixed itself or the update i did manually helped (V13.0.7.0.RGKEUXM) but the score now is this:

Raider0001 said:
it fixed itself or the update i did manually helped (V13.0.7.0.RGKEUXM) but the score now is this:
View attachment 5588385
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you make a couple of phone calls and try out the same benchmark? I am sure you should see decreased performance.
Check this for what's going on in detail.
*** New Device Forum Requests ***
Please post all your requests here. The forum admins choose new device forums carefully, based on several factors. There's no guarantee your device will have a forum created here, but feel free to posts your requests in this thread :) Please do...
forum.xda-developers.com
Unfortunately, xda-developers not allowing a forum to be created for this device(Redmi note 11 spes) for reasons unknown despite so many requests!

After a phone call the cpu caps at 50%. I had this phone.