LanguageLevel in ProjectRootManager component node in misc.xml - Android Studio

Hello,
This i cannot get to the bottom of... I have been using android studio with JDK 1.7 because that's whats on my machine, although have read various to say you can still ensure the android application can only use 1.6 java functionality.
So i have set all sorts in the settings to try to get this langaugeLevel to be JDK_1_6 while project-jdk-name is 1.7. It was behaving but now everytime i gradle sync it sets it to JDK_1_7.
I've set:
compileOptions {
sourceCompatibility JavaVersion.VERSION_1_6
targetCompatibility JavaVersion.VERSION_1_6
}
I've also set byte code to 1.6 in Default Settings, Buidsl, Exec...,, Compiler, Java Compiler
Something must set this up in misc. I also don't know if it's even relevant. Any enlightenment will be must appreciated. It's the tiniest thing but really frustrating.
Thanks
In .idea/misc.xml
Code:
<component name="ProjectRootManager" version="2" languageLevel="JDK_1_6" default="true" assert-keyword="true" jdk-15="true" project-jdk-name="1.6" project-jdk-type="JavaSDK">
<output url="file://$PROJECT_DIR$/build/classes" />
</component>

Related

[DEV] First step of reserve engineering libcamera (Work in progress)

Hi all,
I'm working on reserve engineering libcamera for Tattoo, based on libcamera2 by NCommander. Thanks to nopy for many help.
HTC have changed a lot in their kernel, and left LOTS of useless or temporary codes not to be cleaned up. Right now, camera codes in the kernel are very clean and tidy and mainly ported from AOSP-donut kernel. Interfaces of /dev/msm_camera/control0, config0, and frame0 are successfully generated. As you know, HTC kernel implemented the /dev/msm_camera/msm_camera0 interface to communicate with requests from user space. I'm not sure why HTC did such a hack. The reason why I ported camera codes from AOSP-donut relies on the fact that most of camera working ROMs for other headsets like Dream or Sapphire did this, even if these ROMs are powered by 2.6.32 or even 2.6.34 kernels.
I've sticked to HTC camera driver in the kernel. Please check out my github.
Here is the explanation of the relationship between libcamera, libqcamera and the kernel, written by NCommander.
This is my first step to reserver engineering work on libcamera. Camera does NOT work yet.
The current logcat and klogtail have been attached here, Donut version as well. Thanks to MrGland, salva.tejero, and kicmi.
If anyone is interested in hacking for Tattoo, just let know. I'll invite you to cooperate with us.
Regards,
do you want try my kernel?
it have a problem with wifi...but the camera and media driver are correctly loaded...
if u want i can send it via pm
i have fix the GL problem on my rom...i haven't a tatto...but if u want i can see again the problem with your rom.
i'm just thinkg to restart my rom from zero. I have already downloaded the froyo source and i'm starting to compile the source and add my personal kernel...
said me if u want collaborate to made a new 2.2 rom
W/dalvikvm( 613): threadid=10: thread exiting with uncaught exception (group=0x400207d8)
I am by no means a c++ expert, but I started learning it last week. A uncaught exception needs catching so that the whole thread does not terminate, you can deal with them using catch(), unless it is a hardware exception
I think you two have the best chance of making a working froyo rom if you work together based on using your roms. I use fyodors 1.6 rom daily
I believe this too.
I prefer fyodor's rom though cause with his roms I never had problems on booting. Ikxdf' s roms from the other side don't boot on my device(except abusu 2.01 and capcake 1.01)
you two (ikxdf,cn.fyodor) are supermans make a team mix up your files and your skills, make a great panfyodorcake ROM and we, tattoo users will be so happy Good Luck
E: omg sry kiljacken and HCDR.Jacob ale supermans too
cn.fyodor said:
I've dived into the source files, and found there was a __NULL__ "config_defaults" array of structure in egl.cpp file. This array was used in eglChooseConfig function, which is heavily related with my issue. I'm not sure what the codes did since not familiar with C++ programming. I've googled a lot, but no luck.
I need C++ experts to read the opengl codes in Froyo system and find the reason why 'No configs match configSpec' error comes up. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you send me that file or gives me the path to it in the Android source code I'll gladly take a look at it...
If you send me that file or gives me the path to it in the Android source code I'll gladly take a look at it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here...
ikxdf said:
do you want try my kernel?
it have a problem with wifi...but the camera and media driver are correctly loaded...
if u want i can send it via pm
i have fix the GL problem on my rom...i haven't a tatto...but if u want i can see again the problem with your rom.
i'm just thinkg to restart my rom from zero. I have already downloaded the froyo source and i'm starting to compile the source and add my personal kernel...
said me if u want collaborate to made a new 2.2 rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, ikxdf
Glad to see you in this dev thread. My kernel can drive the camera correctly, but I haven't verified it yet. Feel free to send yours to me, I'll test it to check whether it works or not.
speedyracer5 said:
W/dalvikvm( 613): threadid=10: thread exiting with uncaught exception (group=0x400207d8)
I am by no means a c++ expert, but I started learning it last week. A uncaught exception needs catching so that the whole thread does not terminate, you can deal with them using catch(), unless it is a hardware exception
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info. If it's a hardware exception, there must be some bugs in my customized kernel. However, to be honest, I really don't know how to debug the C++ codes.
kiljacken said:
If you send me that file or gives me the path to it in the Android source code I'll gladly take a look at it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. The top path is frameworks/base/opengl. This exception error was thrown by the ./java/android/opengl/GLSurfaceView.java and the eglChooseConfig function is defined in ./libagl/egl.cpp. Hope you find something useful to debug it.
My greetings,
are the best in the tattoo improving.
Thanks to all the people who try to improve the tattoo...
let´s go friends
cn.fyodor said:
Hi, ikxdf
Glad to see you in this dev thread. My kernel can drive the camera correctly, but I haven't verified it yet. Feel free to send yours to me, I'll test it to check whether it works or not.
Thanks for the info. If it's a hardware exception, there must be some bugs in my customized kernel. However, to be honest, I really don't know how to debug the C++ codes.
Thanks. The top path is frameworks/base/opengl. This exception error was thrown by the ./java/android/opengl/GLSurfaceView.java and the eglChooseConfig function is defined in ./libagl/egl.cpp. Hope you find something useful to debug it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've looked much at the files and i have fund that the error you get is caused when an app gives some info about a configuration and EGL can't find a config that matches that information...
Does this error happen in the camera app??
cn.fyodor said:
Hi, ikxdf
Glad to see you in this dev thread. My kernel can drive the camera correctly, but I haven't verified it yet. Feel free to send yours to me, I'll test it to check whether it works or not.
Thanks for the info. If it's a hardware exception, there must be some bugs in my customized kernel. However, to be honest, I really don't know how to debug the C++ codes.
Thanks. The top path is frameworks/base/opengl. This exception error was thrown by the ./java/android/opengl/GLSurfaceView.java and the eglChooseConfig function is defined in ./libagl/egl.cpp. Hope you find something useful to debug it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Exception has been thrown from JAVA because num_config[0] has not been populated by eglChooseConfig. This output parameter it's populated at the last line of eglChooseConfig.
I don't know the architecture of android and egl stuff, what i can reccomend to you is to use the LOGE macro to write in console the list of attibute (attrib_list parameter) and try to see in which point the function returns (using LOGE macro opportunely).
From what i can understand, this function tries to match the list of attributes passed as parameter(attrib_list) with global array of configurations (gConfigs), which contains 8 configurations (every configuration is an array of attributes).
Java makes 2 calls to eglChooseConfig, the first is to retrieve the number of configurations that matches the attribute list, if this number is >0 create an empty array and re-call eglChooseConfig to get the array itself populated, otherwise throws the exception you have showed in your log.
ivendor said:
The Exception has been thrown from JAVA because num_config[0] has not been populated by eglChooseConfig. This output parameter it's populated at the last line of eglChooseConfig.
I don't know the architecture of android and egl stuff, what i can reccomend to you is to use the LOGE macro to write in console the list of attibute (attrib_list parameter) and try to see in which point the function returns (using LOGE macro opportunely).
From what i can understand, this function tries to match the list of attributes passed as parameter(attrib_list) with global array of configurations (gConfigs), which contains 8 configurations (every configuration is an array of attributes).
Java makes 2 calls to eglChooseConfig, the first is to retrieve the number of configurations that matches the attribute list, if this number is >0 create an empty array and re-call eglChooseConfig to get the array itself populated, otherwise throws the exception you have showed in your log.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you're right...
I think it would be important for all of us, to have a rom 100 % funcional 2.1 or 2.2 without the camera, and before fix the camera...i think
If you make a team i havent doubt could be able to make it real
thanks for all
capito djjkd said:
I think it would be important for all of us, to have a rom 100 % funcional 2.1 or 2.2 without the camera, and before fix the camera...i think
If you make a team i havent doubt could be able to make it real
thanks for all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why?
because the devs maybe could stop developing, because they are satisfied of the working camera?
i don't think so. if they could get the camera working, there isn't a long way anymore to a 100% functional 2.1/2.2 ROM.
I hope this comes true, good luck to the devs!!!!!!
ivendor said:
The Exception has been thrown from JAVA because num_config[0] has not been populated by eglChooseConfig. This output parameter it's populated at the last line of eglChooseConfig.
I don't know the architecture of android and egl stuff, what i can reccomend to you is to use the LOGE macro to write in console the list of attibute (attrib_list parameter) and try to see in which point the function returns (using LOGE macro opportunely).
From what i can understand, this function tries to match the list of attributes passed as parameter(attrib_list) with global array of configurations (gConfigs), which contains 8 configurations (every configuration is an array of attributes).
Java makes 2 calls to eglChooseConfig, the first is to retrieve the number of configurations that matches the attribute list, if this number is >0 create an empty array and re-call eglChooseConfig to get the array itself populated, otherwise throws the exception you have showed in your log.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I commented out the setEGLConfigChooser() stmt. in Camera/src/*/ui/GLRootView.java source file to use the GLES default config for camera. Although the 'no config match...' exception didn't come up, camera didn't snapshot any images as if the sensor didn't open. Check out the attachment below.
If the setEGLConfigChooser stmt. was added, in eglChooseConfig function, both possibleMatch and num_config will be 0. I'm trying to find the low-level reason.
The setEGLConfigChooser() in Camera/src/*/ui/GLRootView.java source file is defined:
public void
setEGLConfigChooser (int redSize,
int greenSize, int blueSize, int alphaSize, int depthSize, int stencilSize).
All we want (i think) is the correct values for the parameters. Ok at page
http://brandnewreality.com/blog/android-egl-querying-your-gl-driver
there is a java program to query from a donut tattoo the configs....
Now we can correct the parameters at setEGLConfigChooser function.
I hope that this helps us...
seg
segway_ said:
The setEGLConfigChooser() in Camera/src/*/ui/GLRootView.java source file is defined:
public void
setEGLConfigChooser (int redSize,
int greenSize, int blueSize, int alphaSize, int depthSize, int stencilSize).
All we want (i think) is the correct values for the parameters. Ok at page
http://brandnewreality.com/blog/android-egl-querying-your-gl-driver
there is a java program to query from a donut tattoo the configs....
Now we can correct the parameters at setEGLConfigChooser function.
I hope that this helps us...
seg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wont this method you are proposing hard coding the values?Shouldnt these be set by the user?There must be another class with the default values and which saves the user defined values.
Look at the code:
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=pl...0f823229da7569a51367f20c0c9d048d1cba;hb=froyo
175 private void initialize() {
176 mFlags |= FLAG_INITIALIZED;
177 setEGLConfigChooser(8, 8, 8, 8, 0, 4);
178 getHolder().setFormat(PixelFormat.TRANSLUCENT);
179 setZOrderOnTop(true);
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it hard coded?
seg
Well the values are hard coded.. but at the look of it I guess the hardware need these hard coded values to initialise. Good point seg.

[Q] We can parse the Registry Values through the .xml files ?

Code:
<Service Name="NlpmService"
Group="NsgExtA"
DefaultVersion="1.1.0.7"
Version="1.1.1.1"
SrcName="NlpmService_1_1_1_1.upx"
Resolution="WXGA"
Device="RM-892,RM-875"
MinAK="1317.21087"
MaxAK="1317.21087"
MinBSP="3038.0000"
MaxBSP="3038.0000"
SHA1="98c24472b34bec2881c5d0f1810bc38b15fea47a">
<RegDWORD Path="Software\OEM\Nokia\lpm" KeyName="SwipeEnabled" KeyValue="1"/>
<RegString Path="Software\OEM\Nokia\lpm" KeyName="FontFile" KeyValue="\Data\SharedData\OEM\Public\lpmFont_WXGA.bin"/>
<RegDWORD Path="Software\OEM\Nokia\lpm" KeyName="NormalModeElements" KeyValue="63"/>
<File SrcName="lpmFont_WXGA.upx" DstName="lpmFont_WXGA.bin" SHA1="98c24472b34bec2881c5d0f1810bc38b15fea47a" />
</Service>
Mostly, files like this can point us to potentially interesting files or registry values that we may have other uses for rather than being directly usable themselves. Sometimes they reveal registry keys that we can't browse, which is useful; we can then edit them using INTEROPSERVICES tools or modified ROMs. Sometimes they reveal the purpose of things that we could see before, but didn't know what they do.

Help with importing reverse engineered APK into Android Studio?

Hello guys,
I've got a programming gig which needs me to edit an Android app. Problem is the source file comes in an APK, so I've used dex2jar in conjunction with APKtool to get the source code, resources and AndroidManifest.xml.
I've got some problems with the decompiled JAVA code though. I've created a new project in Android Studio and I'm importing the code in, and I've run into a few problems.
I think the code is obfuscated. The classes are all named a, b, c, d and so on, except for MainActivity. There are also no layout files. setContentView basically takes an object of class b, which is assigned new m(this, this.a). How is it possible that there are no layout files?
So the code package is in com.companyname.projectname right. dex2jar reveals some other folders inside com.companyname, like helper, ui, a, b, c, etc. Are these external packages that the project uses? What roles do they play?
Are there any more efficient ways of reverse engineering an APK and putting them into Android Studio?
terresquall said:
Hello guys,
I've got a programming gig which needs me to edit an Android app. Problem is the source file comes in an APK, so I've used dex2jar in conjunction with APKtool to get the source code, resources and AndroidManifest.xml.
I've got some problems with the decompiled JAVA code though. I've created a new project in Android Studio and I'm importing the code in, and I've run into a few problems.
I think the code is obfuscated. The classes are all named a, b, c, d and so on, except for MainActivity. There are also no layout files. setContentView basically takes an object of class b, which is assigned new m(this, this.a). How is it possible that there are no layout files?
So the code package is in com.companyname.projectname right. dex2jar reveals some other folders inside com.companyname, like helper, ui, a, b, c, etc. Are these external packages that the project uses? What roles do they play?
Are there any more efficient ways of reverse engineering an APK and putting them into Android Studio?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately what you're asking, probably won't get the reply you're after as it's technically dubious. If you have a "programming gig" as you put it, they should have the source code for the project that they wan't you to work on, if not then I would suspect they don't own it. Either way, code is obfuscated for this reason, good luck.

How to use Java Function in Tasker?

Hello,
I'm using Sygic Navigation for Android. Now I'm trying to get some data out of Sygic to use in Tasker. For example I want to get my Estimated Time of Arrival (ETA) and save it as a variable in Tasker. Sygic offers a SDK, see "developers [dot] sygic [dot] com [slash] documentation.php?action=code_geteta" (sorry, first post, not allowed to post URLs), so I guess there are possibilities with Tasker....??
The thing is, I'm really new to programming and have no idea how to start / what to do with the Java possibilities in Tasker
Is there anyone who can help me "translate" the Java code below to some Java code that I can use in Tasker? Or is this not possible at all?
Code:
import com.sygic.sdk.remoteapi.Api;
import com.sygic.sdk.remoteapi.ApiNavigation;
import com.sygic.sdk.remoteapi.model.RouteInfo;
...
String strETA = "";
try {
RouteInfo info = ApiNavigation.getRouteInfo(false, 0);
RouteInfo.RouteInfoTime eta = info.getEstimatedTimeArrival();
strETA = String.valueOf(eta);
} catch (GeneralException e) {
Log.e("RouteInfo", "Error code:"+ e.getCode());
}
Thanks!
Vic
I would not go the SDK / Java route unless you have some Java programming skills already.
In your case, try to investigate Autonotification and AutoInput which are two very popular Tasker plugins.
You can find some similar examples (I actually do it with Maps) on the AutoApps forum.
It won't work at all in Tasker unless you write a completely new plugin. How can you use Sygic SDK in Tasker?? I don't think it's possible. If the information is in the notification you can use Notification Listener to get the notification in the task and read it. If it's only on the screen you can read it using the action "read screen" of TouchTask plugin.

Building a Project on a Network Attached Storage Case Sensitive File System

Hello,
I'm just starting out with Android Studio. I did a search on my issue but didn't find anything related.
I have Android Studio installed on a MacOS computer and I tried building a basic blank app project for testing. The destination folder for the project was on a Network Attached Storage hard drive (Western Digital MyCloud). The build failed with the following gradle error:
Code:
Could not create service of type FileCollectionSnapshotterRegistry using TaskExecutionServices.createFileCollectionSnapshotterRegistry().
> Could not create service of type CachingFileHasher using TaskExecutionServices.createFileSnapshotter().
I did some Google searches but could not find anything to help me interpret what that means.
I did notice a few other things I think are more meaningful. Before the build, Android Studio warned me my project was being installed on a case sensitive file system so I put the statement in my preferences to set case sensitive to true.
After the build failed with the gradle error I looked at the code in the MainActivity class. Several of the
Code:
import
statements were greyed out and a mouse over showed that they indicated as unused. The
Code:
@Override
annotations were underlined with red error markings and a mouse over indicated that the classes to be overriden were unresolved.. I suspect the class names weren't being resolved because of case sensitivity issues with the file system.
I decided to build the project on my local hard drive. I got a warning that it was a case insensitive file system because I still had case sensitive set in my preferences but the project built successfully with no errors there.

Categories

Resources