Database Develop

[Q] CyanogenMod 9! - [02/01/12] Bug!

I use the p1000 CM9 ROM.
But I found a serious bug, Is in Call, the other party heard a lot of sharp sound!
My device is P1000, the modem using JMF.
From Overcome_7 upgrade to CM9.
Finally, thank you rom.

and
The flash file is CM9-SGT7-TE4M-RC0.20120202.zip, P1000-CM9-HumberOS-Kernel-2012.zip, gapps_ics_403_v11.zip

vinsontseng said:
I use the p1000 CM9 ROM.
But I found a serious bug, Is in Call, the other party heard a lot of sharp sound!
My device is P1000, the modem using JMF.
From Overcome_7 upgrade to CM9.
Finally, thank you rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fix with next build

Sorry if this is a bit off-topic but i've just flashed this rom to my GT-P1000. Almost all of my apps do not work, including facebook. Can anyone confirm that this is normal with this release candidate?
Also the tablet hangs when i try to reboot into recovery from ICS.

munce31 said:
Sorry if this is a bit off-topic but i've just flashed this rom to my GT-P1000. Almost all of my apps do not work, including facebook. Can anyone confirm that this is normal with this release candidate?
Also the tablet hangs when i try to reboot into recovery from ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nevermind. I've realized that i've had to re-install all my apps from the app market to get them working again.
I'm really pleased with this version by humbertos and the team.

No its no normal if you do the wipes and reinstall the apps throught titanium back up. Follow the steps forma install cm9 ro.
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk

[Q] Recommended ICS ROM

What ICS ROM do you recommend me? Thanks!

Both The CM9 nightlies and AOKP are nice ICS ROMs.
They are stable. While AOKP has more features and flexibility, CM9 nightly in general has less bugs and more builds to update from.

Thanks. And works the camera in both of them. It is important for me.
I know cm7 and I like cyanogen. So I will start with this.
Enviado desde mi Nexus One usando Tapatalk 2

Camera works on both. But I think CM9has a better menu for the camera app.
AOKP camera does not have the complete menu therefore flash setting is impossible to change.
I imagine you can get camera patch from CM9 flash it to AOKP. Btw AOKP is a CM9 based rom.

threepwood960 said:
What ICS ROM do you recommend me? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome name/avatar bud!

yappoe said:
Camera works on both. But I think CM9has a better menu for the camera app.
AOKP camera does not have the complete menu therefore flash setting is impossible to change.
I imagine you can get camera patch from CM9 flash it to AOKP. Btw AOKP is a CM9 based rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been wanting to upgrade from 2.3.6 to ICS but in dilemma if I want to install CM9 or AOKP. Both looks like nice ROM. I guess now I am leaning toward AOKP. I guess I will flash CM9 first for a week, and try AOKP for another week before deciding to stick with one. Thanks.

I finally am trying Cm9 and it works ok. I think it will be my daily rom.
Enviado desde mi Nexus One usando Tapatalk 2

TheATHEiST said:
Awesome name/avatar bud!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, Guybrush is the best.
Enviado desde mi Nexus One usando Tapatalk 2

Aokp milestone 5 is good, and so is build 36
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium

Finally on CM9 -- After 2 days of a scare! I guess almost everyone here has experiences boot loops. But so many posts help me went through successfully.
The most important thing is to remain calm when the tab does not boot up correctly. -- and this crazy post from a guy trying to "hard brick" his tab made me a little bit calm.
Nice ROM. And I this GOO Manager makes downloads easy. Next week: AOKP

threepwood960 said:
Thanks, Guybrush is the best.
Enviado desde mi Nexus One usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed, SOMI was my first ever Adventure game I played back in my Amiga dayz. My fave is COMI though

Overcome to CM9
Can i flash CM9 in my Overcome tab without restocking?

Yes. Because after restocking you still need overcome kernel anyway.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA

slyv3 said:
Finally on CM9 -- After 2 days of a scare! I guess almost everyone here has experiences boot loops. But so many posts help me went through successfully.
The most important thing is to remain calm when the tab does not boot up correctly. -- and this crazy post from a guy trying to "hard brick" his tab made me a little bit calm.
Nice ROM. And I this GOO Manager makes downloads easy. Next week: AOKP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't suggest you to install AOKP, because it derivates from CM9, so they have the same bugs. What more, AOKP has too small keys (I'm referring to those who are at the bottom of the screen and allow you to go back, return home or view the open applications), even if it has some features more, and they're a bit buggy, too. Personally, I returned to Overcome 4.1.0, since ICS has too small icons and the battery used to last less than 24 hours without an intense use.
By the way, in English which of these expressions is correct: "What's more" or "What more"?
Sent from my Galaxy Tab

I am on aokp #36 and I really can't let you say it is more buggy than cm9.
I can do everything without problem.
Small buttons is known issue and easily resolved ( workaround) by customising the buttons. Just add one more or change one of them to
a "menu" button and no more tiny buttons.
On the other hand, cm9 is changing daily so it is more buggy.
Btw, aokp is by team kang, and not related to cm.
Only stimpz0r's aokp for p1000 has TE4M's CM9 stuff included with permission.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA

As you are discussing about Bootloop, i want to verify about installation.
When i flashed CM9 , i got bootloop . And then i followed the installation instruction from AOKP which is pressing up volume key and install .zip again. and it's worked. Is it the correct way to install CM9? or i just didn't give enough time for bootloop (cuz in CM9 instruction it's normal). I waited not less than 3 minutes.

guys! have you tried cdesai's unofficial build? its awesome! you can download it from goo.im, under devs section->cdesai. im really loving his build. navbar can be fully customized, even the toggles. cant wait for the next release of his build!
just one thing though, i wish that the official nightly builds will soon be merged with these such customization options. it will be like an early christmas present!
---------- Post added at 02:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:14 AM ----------
priyana said:
I am on aokp #36 and I really can't let you say it is more buggy than cm9.
I can do everything without problem.
Small buttons is known issue and easily resolved ( workaround) by customising the buttons. Just add one more or change one of them to
a "menu" button and no more tiny buttons.
On the other hand, cm9 is changing daily so it is more buggy.
Btw, aokp is by team kang, and not related to cm.
Only stimpz0r's aokp for p1000 has TE4M's CM9 stuff included with permission.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
one thing that bugs me in the aokp builds is the spacing of the navbar buttons, navbar buttons are too close apart.

Acually all roms with ics 4.0.4. Tried them all, all working fine, for little issues is always a solution, but so far i prefer aokp with its features. The only thing not working for me yet is direct wifi, but iam sure it will be fixed soon.
Sent from my GT-P6200 using XDA

123Kage said:
As you are discussing about Bootloop, i want to verify about installation.
When i flashed CM9 , i got bootloop . And then i followed the installation instruction from AOKP which is pressing up volume key and install .zip again. and it's worked. Is it the correct way to install CM9? or i just didn't give enough time for bootloop (cuz in CM9 instruction it's normal). I waited not less than 3 minutes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello.. Pls say something on this

I will say: "as long as it works"
The install method for CM9 and AOKP is identical.
Also note that CM9 Dev thread said:
Normal install :
You need to have a kernel with CWM Recovery
Get the zip from the above download links
Put the zip on your sdcard, reboot into recovery, and install the zip
It'll reboot a few times during the install, that's normal
What does that tell you? Sounds like boot loop, right? Yes, it is the same.
Coming from BML, it will throw you to recovery.
If you come from Overcome, you will notice that the CWM is no longer Overcome's one, it may say HumberOS or whatever.
That is what the first install done to you. So proceed with second time install and you will be ok.
Again, as long as it works.

cm/pa building/discussion & plans.

hello all, I've just picked up a razr i as a temp standin while my xperia Z is away under warranty repair.
(it was cheap enough to keep too play with afterwards)
is there any reason why no-one has started on CM /PA yet? I've looked through all the posts and can't see anything remotely like a real custom rom..
I'm happy to start working on this (will probably leave it till my Z is back in use though), but would like to get a decent team together to work on it, rather than do it on my own, which is what I've done in the past for a few devices and burnt myself out!
if you're interested then let me know
DO NOT POST
Code:
+1
and me
or
let me beta test !
I want people with a more technical bent than a lot of the users on here to get involved.
for those people, is there anything I'm missing that would stop us building for this?
we have kernel source, and omars kernel looks fairly decent basepoint looking at his git, and some source from motorola that looks sloppily put together.
we can flash with fastboot, and even using blobs it doesn't look too arduous to get at least a 4.1 based build going, so am I missing something?
I'm pretty open on how I work, but I don't tolerate people demanding stuff, or expecting perfection, this will be a W.I.P for a very long time (especially if done on my own).

As far as i know, the problem is on intel processor libs... That's what i've read somewhere around here

Aosp and cm build with some modifications. The phone boots, but in a boot loop on my build. Haven't solved that and will not solve it I think. I have some skills in building, modifying and debugging, but not enough... To get it working. Give it a shot, we can help everyone to get past some certane problems we already solved.
Sent from my GT-P5110 using XDA Premium HD app

Hazou said:
Aosp and cm build with some modifications. The phone boots, but in a boot loop on my build. Haven't solved that and will not solve it I think. I have some skills in building, modifying and debugging, but not enough... To get it working. Give it a shot, we can help everyone to get past some certane problems we already solved.
Sent from my GT-P5110 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you have a record of what you've already done (other than the github obviously)?
I couldn't find anything searching ..

anerik said:
As far as i know, the problem is on intel processor libs... That's what i've read somewhere around here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fards said:
hello all, I've just picked up a razr i as a temp standin while my xperia Z is away under warranty repair.
(it was cheap enough to keep too play with afterwards)
is there any reason why no-one has started on CM /PA yet? I've looked through all the posts and can't see anything remotely like a real custom rom..
I'm happy to start working on this (will probably leave it till my Z is back in use though), but would like to get a decent team together to work on it, rather than do it on my own, which is what I've done in the past for a few devices and burnt myself out!
if you're interested then let me know
DO NOT POST
Code:
+1
and me
or
let me beta test !
I want people with a more technical bent than a lot of the users on here to get involved.
for those people, is there anything I'm missing that would stop us building for this?
we have kernel source, and omars kernel looks fairly decent basepoint looking at his git, and some source from motorola that looks sloppily put together.
we can flash with fastboot, and even using blobs it doesn't look too arduous to get at least a 4.1 based build going, so am I missing something?
I'm pretty open on how I work, but I don't tolerate people demanding stuff, or expecting perfection, this will be a W.I.P for a very long time (especially if done on my own).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hello the problem is that no source AOSP (Cyanogen or AOKP) have x86 libraries and formats, visit www.androidx86.org
if you need a beta tester let me know
The app also must be compatible with x86

The problem I faced was that at the moment of booting it kept restarting netd -- which is odd seeing how the Kernel iptables/ipchains and net configuration is the same on Motorola's one. [info]
I even tried adding and compiling extra modules on the Kernel without much luck -- and it was not the typical ramdisk *.rc files fix here.

Hmm I presumed that with the amount of x86 development boards about there would be a load more work on bringing cm across.
I'll start to have a look at it in depth in the next couple of weeks.
Sent from my XT890 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

On my github I got some work and fixes. Not all of them though. Someone's aren't uploaded yet
Sent from my XT890 using xda app-developers app

Is it easyer to make miui v5?
RAZR i xt890 Tapatalk 2

choppertriker said:
Is it easyer to make miui v5?
RAZR i xt890 Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Harder cause it's not only based on cm10 it's alto different port

For MiUi 4.0 there was the possibility to make a stock based Miui Rom,
There even was one for our Razr i, even though it wasn't very popular.
Is this possibility gone with v5 or is there any other reason not to?
greetings

Killigrew said:
For MiUi 4.0 there was the possibility to make a stock based Miui Rom,
There even was one for our Razr i, even though it wasn't very popular.
Is this possibility gone with v5 or is there any other reason not to?
greetings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
v4 is different, cause all the porting guides are adapted for it, plus there's miuiv4.1 for razr which is easily portable i guess, but v5 is a whole different matter cause it's based on cm

I will be very happy if anyone port miui 4.1 for our razr, i used it before, on my old phone
If anybody dev could do it i think many ppl will be happy as i.
Wysyłane z mojego XT890 za pomocą Tapatalk 2

Oh yes! Please port miui to razr i. :thumbup:
RAZR i xt890 Tapatalk 2

Personally I will never touch muios with a bargepole
Sent from my GT-N8010 using Tapatalk HD

A real cm or pa build would be awesome! I hope you guys make my dreams come true

Any news fards?
Enviado desde mi XT890 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta

Nope sorry, not yet. been trying to get an aosp build booting from the Motorola code, but it's not happening with that yet. never mind any further progress
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

fards said:
Nope sorry, not yet. been trying to get an aosp build booting from the Motorola code, but it's not happening with that yet. never mind any further progress
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont worry bro, i have all my hope that one day we gonna have cm or pa
Enviado desde mi XT890 usando Tapatalk 4 Beta

I got Intel's AOSP Android (4.1.2) to build and then made some binary blob overlays on top. It show the Motorola animation logo on the Phone and then it starts flickering -- I have yet to plug adb to it, but I need to go to sleep soon.
Experimental File, adb enabled at boot: RazRi_AOSP_A001.zip [Flashes boot animation, this is using Motorola's *.prop files, which shouldn't be]
Experimental File, adb enabled at boot: RazRi_AOSP_A002.zip [Have not tried this one, this has safe cflags and default build.prop]
Source: https://github.com/oxavelar/android_device_motorola_intel_smi
Q: Anyone with two phones who knows what to experiment with? I put the instructions to build on the github readme at the moment.

Stable Kitkat rom

Please port a kitkat rom for our device.. or pls make a stable with stable kernel.. pls i rqst devs :crying:

sidhg said:
Please port a kitkat rom for our device.. or pls make a stable with stable kernel.. pls i rqst devs :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there isnt Ivan aosp?

yes there is one... But it doesn't have any customisatons option.. And my mobile gets easily even in moderate use..

How about Miui V7. Did you try?

I want stock like nexus.. miui lags

There were a lot of stable cm and aosp+ builds of KitKat. Download 1 of them and flash a modern kernel for lp or one of them that has KitKat support and it should work just fine. I flashed carbon rom then flashed xcelerate build 65 kernel without any issues booting or functioning. I never used it long enough to confirm random reboot was gone but as that was related to kernel issue the odds are it wasn't going to ever happen
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk

sidhg said:
I want stock like nexus.. miui lags
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me too. I don't really like MIUI. Why don't you try Lollipop ROM like Blisspop. It's quite stable, no bugs, no SOD, customizable, you can use as daily ROM. I used Extended Partition, TWRP and TK Gapps.
It is better than MIUI, I think.

lollipop don't have good battery backup

this is not entirely true ... the difference is about 10 or up to 20% in favor of miui (stable) ... the latest china developer MIUI rom also suffers from poor battery life... sacrifice 1h (sot) use of the phone is quite profitable ... in my eyes.

Sot may not see a huge difference but with standby time KitKat blew lp out of the water unless you didn't flash gapps in lp. That's my opinion and experience anyway. Gapps in lollipop is always a huge battery drain I've never been able to fully control even by turning everything off in app ops and etc.
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk

u can use xposed(gravity box) in Ivan's aosp for customizations

i snort flour said:
There were a lot of stable cm and aosp+ builds of KitKat. Download 1 of them and flash a modern kernel for lp or one of them that has KitKat support and it should work just fine. I flashed carbon rom then flashed xcelerate build 65 kernel without any issues booting or functioning. I never used it long enough to confirm random reboot was gone but as that was related to kernel issue the odds are it wasn't going to ever happen
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are any issues with your configuration ?

Only real problem I seen was a slower charge and the back camera didn't work and the front camera quality was crap. If it had a working camera I would honestly still be using carbon KitKat or even pa aosp+ KitKat which didn't have the slow charging issue but didn't look as nice though either.
Sorry my quotes no longer work Tapatalk has to keep screwing up a good thing and turning it into crap
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk

out of all the custom roms i tried, Ivan's aosp kitkat was the most stable and I had no problems with it except the capacitive button light issue which wasn't a major concern for me, for customizations xposed was my way to go. I highly recommend you to try it if stability is your concern ✌
hope this helped you

i snort flour said:
There were a lot of stable cm and aosp+ builds of KitKat. Download 1 of them and flash a modern kernel for lp or one of them that has KitKat support and it should work just fine. I flashed carbon rom then flashed xcelerate build 65 kernel without any issues booting or functioning. I never used it long enough to confirm random reboot was gone but as that was related to kernel issue the odds are it wasn't going to ever happen
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wi-Fi worked with Xcelerate kernel on KitKat?

Me_Ashish_ said:
Wi-Fi worked with Xcelerate kernel on KitKat?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't recommend it because the only good KitKat rom for this phone was Ivan's. Pa wasn't bad but you won't have a camera anymore. I never tested it on Ivan's but I did test it on carbon and WiFi worked fine on it if I remember correctly. The slow charging (which is fixable flashing a boot.img from a rom with faster charging) and not having a working camera kept me from keeping it. I still wouldn't recommending going to KitKat unless you can persuade a Dev to make a fully functional KitKat rom. I seen a couple devs say they would but never followed through and with all the real devs working on marshmallow your not going to see any help there.
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk

i snort flour said:
I wouldn't recommend it because the only good KitKat rom for this phone was Ivan's. Pa wasn't bad but you won't have a camera anymore. I never tested it on Ivan's but I did test it on carbon and WiFi worked fine on it if I remember correctly. The slow charging (which is fixable flashing a boot.img from a rom with faster charging) and not having a working camera kept me from keeping it. I still wouldn't recommending going to KitKat unless you can persuade a Dev to make a fully functional KitKat rom. I seen a couple devs say they would but never followed through and with all the real devs working on marshmallow your not going to see any help there.
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On PA with Xcelerate, Wi-Fi didn't work and also there was frequent android.media force closes. Not with other kernels though. Camera of course doesn't work.
I didn't stayed long on the ROM. But I did got a random reboot type once (in PA the phone simply dies and u have to hard reboot). Camera doesn't work of course.
Ivan's ROM is laggy af. The scrolling is laggy everywhere and etc. I don't like the custom kernels as the phone heats (little bit less with Xcelerate). And not quite sure whether the upcoming Xcelerate build will be compatible with MIUI.
Only MIUI is the usable Kitsap ROM quite actually. Would have been cool if Xiaomi upgraded the Android version, which is not gonna happen at all IMO

Keeping up with Android

I guess this is the right place to post this question as the other one would be more focused on the development side.
What is in our opinion and experience the best rom / mod running on N7000?
I'm stuck with the stock updated only to KitKat and missing on security updates, but I'm also concerned that if I run any rom for later Android version my Note would get extremely slow.

Gezedka said:
I guess this is the right place to post this question as the other one would be more focused on the development side.
What is in our opinion and experience the best rom / mod running on N7000?
I'm stuck with the stock updated only to KitKat and missing on security updates, but I'm also concerned that if I run any rom for later Android version my Note would get extremely slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For security, go with CM12.1 at the absolute maximum. CM13 (and potentially CM14) feels like it's gonna kill the Note.

AutumQueen92 said:
For security, go with CM12.1 at the absolute maximum. CM13 (and potentially CM14) feels like it's gonna kill the Note.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, AutummQueen. You seem to be have been using CM13 Nightowl though. Is it making it slow or is it crashing?

Gezedka said:
Thanks, AutummQueen. You seem to be have been using CM13 Nightowl though. Is it making it slow or is it crashing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was slow for me, but I haven't been using the recent builds. My phone is on loan to someone right now so I haven't updated.
Sent from my Xperia C3 using XDA Labs

It's true what @AutumQueen92 says but if you are coming from a completely stock phone with KK it's almost certainly slow and laggy by now so you should see a big improvement than your current speed provided you also flash a kernel that has emmc trim support and also a bigger partition too, even though CM12 may be marginally slower than stock in original mint condition!
I flashed NightOwl 12.1 which includes a kernal with trim support as per Savin Vasudevan instructions to increases partition size for apps and the phone feels much faster. The main reason is the memory is trimmed or can be trimmed with fstrim app manually. See the "How to Repartition your device and install this Rom:" link on the NightOwl CM12.1.1 thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note/development/rom-t2938649 , best of all this ROM gets the monthly security updates you are after!
(Also very stable, mines never had an FC, though I do have an issue recently with the videocam freezing but that is my phone I think not the ROM)

Many thanks, guys! Very useful input form you! I'll start with CM12 as soon as I get the new battery from Amazon. Looking forward to see Note 1 in its (near) old glory and with security updates.

Im not even testing NightOwl cm 13. Right now Im on NightOwl cm 12.1 and I must say rom is little laggy from time to time. But without frezzes or force closes. Only issue with camera in whatsapp randomly.
I will try again NightOwl cm 11 cause I use them some time ago and I think that kitkat version was running little faster. Even if I loved Lollipop looks, recent apps and night option I will test again kitkat from Bauners hands.
Wysłane z mojego GT-N7000 przy użyciu Tapatalka

For me the more stable and fast room is stock , i ever try random room but i get back
Enviado desde mi XT1563 mediante Tapatalk