How is development on the S2 8" 710? I'm looking for a newer tab just for media, browsing ,rooting/roms and xposed.
I don't want bigger just newer/ faster.
Any help is appreciated.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
nuxbag said:
How is development on the S2 8" 710? I'm looking for a newer tab just for media, browsing ,rooting/roms and xposed.
I don't want bigger just newer/ faster.
Any help is appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here
https://forum.xda-developers.com/ta...lineageos-14-1-tab-s2-8-0-2015-t3551031/page4
nostupidthing said:
Here
https://forum.xda-developers.com/ta...lineageos-14-1-tab-s2-8-0-2015-t3551031/page4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was actually looking option on the S2 or maybe and better tablet option where development in general is still alive and well. Thanks for your help.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
nuxbag said:
I was actually looking option on the S2 or maybe and better tablet option where development in general is still alive and well. Thanks for your help.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Development in general for tablets are pretty slow compared to phones. Tab S2 has decent development going on, but it will not be as good as Nexus 7.
For better development, Nexus 9 is still an option, but not as good a hardware as S2.
That link you quoted, the rom in Nougat, and there are some good developers involved in that project. There are other aosp roms available.
I have researched long before purchasing my S2, and I am pretty sure there is no other tablet with decent hardware that has as much development ongoing.
For more future proofing, you can get the s2 713 snapdragon version, or if your budget permits, wait for S3.
suhridkhan said:
Development in general for tablets are pretty slow compared to phones. Tab S2 has decent development going on, but it will not be as good as Nexus 7.
For better development, Nexus 9 is still an option, but not as good a hardware as S2.
That link you quoted, the rom in Nougat, and there are some good developers involved in that project. There are other aosp roms available.
I have researched long before purchasing my S2, and I am pretty sure there is no other tablet with decent hardware that has as much development ongoing.
For more future proofing, you can get the s2 713 snapdragon version, or if your budget permits, wait for S3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks you very good info.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
suhridkhan said:
Development in general for tablets are pretty slow compared to phones. Tab S2 has decent development going on, but it will not be as good as Nexus 7.
For better development, Nexus 9 is still an option, but not as good a hardware as S2.
That link you quoted, the rom in Nougat, and there are some good developers involved in that project. There are other aosp roms available.
I have researched long before purchasing my S2, and I am pretty sure there is no other tablet with decent hardware that has as much development ongoing.
For more future proofing, you can get the s2 713 snapdragon version, or if your budget permits, wait for S3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine that T713 is another cpu and totally another rom though
suhridkhan said:
Development in general for tablets are pretty slow compared to phones. Tab S2 has decent development going on, but it will not be as good as Nexus 7.
For better development, Nexus 9 is still an option, but not as good a hardware as S2.
That link you quoted, the rom in Nougat, and there are some good developers involved in that project. There are other aosp roms available.
I have researched long before purchasing my S2, and I am pretty sure there is no other tablet with decent hardware that has as much development ongoing.
For more future proofing, you can get the s2 713 snapdragon version, or if your budget permits, wait for S3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well been looking around don't see a lot for the 713, but i see more for the 710 what to do!!!
nuxbag said:
Well been looking around don't see a lot for the 713, but i see more for the 710 what to do!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
713 most likely gonna get a Nougat update from Samsung, while 710 being a year older have very slim chances. If you are okay with aosp roms, 710 is not a bad option...
suhridkhan said:
713 most likely gonna get a Nougat update from Samsung, while 710 being a year older have very slim chances. If you are okay with aosp roms, 710 is not a bad option...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a bid in for 240 new on the t713. Let's see what happens. If not then there's a refurbished t710 for 227. Thanks.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
Related
For those who are waiting for custom ROM's for the Tab S (WiFi) you maybe disappointed. From my experience with the Tab Pro (WiFi) there are no custom ROM's for the Exynos SOC. I am hoping someone can prove me wrong.
D
Mr Dasher said:
For those who are waiting for custom ROM's for the Tab S (WiFi) you maybe disappointed. From my experience with the Tab Pro (WiFi) there are no custom ROM's for the Exynos SOC. I am hoping someone can prove me wrong.
D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a number of roms for the 10.1 Pro which has the Exynos does it not? They may be TouchWiz based but still debloated and faster.
mitchellvii said:
There are a number of roms for the 10.1 Pro which has the Exynos does it not? They may be TouchWiz based but still debloated and faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess you're right. For me those modified stock ROM'S never provided enough benefit to make me root my tablet to install. By custom ROM'S I mean ROM'S that include such things as tweaked kernels, ie, Cyanogen Mod.
The reason there was little development for the 10.1 Pro wasn't Exynos, it was because no one bought it. N10.1-14's with S Pen could be had as refurbs for $350 and even at retail they were close to the same price. After the N10.1-14 received 4.4 the only thing missing compared to the Pro was M-UX and to some that was a good thing. The N10.1-14's dev community if fairly decent for a tablet. Samsung's going to sink gazillions of marketing dollars in to the S' and with their AMOLED displays they finally have a distinguishing feature. Whether officially or via neglect the 8.4/10.1 Pro's are dead with the equivalent S' replacing them.
Everyone's claiming confusion about Samsung's tablet line but it's actually pretty clear. Entry level = Tab 4's, premium devices = the S', and productivity/creation devices = the Note's. The non-Note Pro's were apparently just a stop gap until the S' were ready.
Regardless, comparing development for the S' to the 10.1 Pro's is apples and oranges.
BarryH_GEG said:
The reason there was little development for the 10.1 Pro wasn't Exynos, it was because no one bought it. N10.1-14's with S Pen could be had as refurbs for $350 and even at retail they were close to the same price. After the N10.1-14 received 4.4 the only thing missing compared to the Pro was M-UX and to some that was a good thing. The N10.1-14's dev community if fairly decent for a tablet. Samsung's going to sink gazillions of marketing dollars in to the S' and with their AMOLED displays they finally have a distinguishing feature. Whether officially or via neglect the 8.4/10.1 Pro's are dead with the equivalent S' replacing them.
Everyone's claiming confusion about Samsung's tablet line but it's actually pretty clear. Entry level = Tab 4's, premium devices = the S', and productivity/creation devices = the Note's. The non-Note Pro's were apparently just a stop gap until the S' were ready.
Regardless, comparing development for the S' to the 10.1 Pro's is apples and oranges.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey BarryH, long time no see. Yep, there will be plenty of development for the 10.5 S as it is likely to be very popular.
mitchellvii said:
Hey BarryH, long time no see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey there. For once I'm not lusting after the next "shiny" thing on the horizon; for both my phone and tablet. I have a N10.1-14 that I love and its replaced my laptop 50% of the time. Next time I'm in Latin America I'm going to replace my 3G with a 4G version sold there that works on AT&T. All Samsung's newer high-end tablets are really the same with some s/w and h/w tweaks. With the exception of the Tab S' AMOLED display and finger print reader mostly the former. UI wise, with the exception of M-UX being omitted, Samsung brought the N10.1-14 up to "Pro" level with the 4.4 update. If I didn't use S Note/S Pen and was a consumption user I'd be all over the Tab S. Both for its display and color. Who could resist Titanium Bronze? Hope you enjoy yours.
BarryH_GEG said:
Hey there. For once I'm not lusting after the next "shiny" thing on the horizon; for both my phone and tablet. I have a N10.1-14 that I love and its replaced my laptop 50% of the time. Next time I'm in Latin America I'm going to replace my 3G with a 4G version sold there that works on AT&T. All Samsung's newer high-end tablets are really the same with some s/w and h/w tweaks. With the exception of the Tab S' AMOLED display and finger print reader mostly the former. UI wise, with the exception of M-UX being omitted, Samsung brought the N10.1-14 up to "Pro" level with the 4.4 update. If I didn't use S Note/S Pen and was a consumption user I'd be all over the Tab S. Both for its display and color. Who could resist Titanium Bronze? Hope you enjoy yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually do not care for titanium bronze. Looks like dark gray to me. I wanted black but settled for white.
Barry. Your a GOD. you just killed another thread with your amazing insight. Kudos! ?
mitchellvii said:
I actually do not care for titanium bronze. Looks like dark gray to me. I wanted black but settled for white.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just kidding. I thought the name was funny and more suitable for a Ford or Chevy. I'd probably get white too.
BarryH_GEG said:
I was just kidding. I thought the name was funny and more suitable for a Ford or Chevy. I'd probably get white too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although with my white tablet and case I feel a little like Tony Curtis in The Great Race. Just call me Leslie.
Mr Dasher said:
For those who are waiting for custom ROM's for the Tab S (WiFi) you maybe disappointed. From my experience with the Tab Pro (WiFi) there are no custom ROM's for the Exynos SOC. I am hoping someone can prove me wrong.
D
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm longing mostly for root, so I can dump the bloatware and hopefully get OTG working.
takeadare said:
I'm longing mostly for root, so I can dump the bloatware and hopefully get OTG working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I came here looking for root options. Does the towel root from Geohot not work on the Tab S?
aznguyen316 said:
I came here looking for root options. Does the towel root from Geohot not work on the Tab S?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
saw a post in the TR thread in gs5 forum..."Samsung galaxy tab pro 8.4 ,this method does not work, it reboots."
Cant wait to root this sucker myself.
Mr Dasher said:
I guess you're right. For me those modified stock ROM'S never provided enough benefit to make me root my tablet to install. By custom ROM'S I mean ROM'S that include such things as tweaked kernels, ie, Cyanogen Mod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Up to individual taste. For me CM is just too bland a interface, I actually like TW and have "cooked" a few ROMs in the past. They are actually "custom" as modified from Samsung, so is CM, modified from Google is "custom"........but each to their own.
Devices running TW firmware do actually have "tweaked kernels", such as my Note 3 is running my own SkyHigh kernel built from official Samsung sources.
When I get my hands on a 8.4 LTE model, that's exactly what I'll be doing too !
UpInTheAir said:
Up to individual taste. For me CM is just too bland a interface, I actually like TW and have "cooked" a few ROMs in the past. They are actually "custom" as modified from Samsung, so is CM, modified from Google is "custom"........but each to their own.
Devices running TW firmware do actually have "tweaked kernels", such as my Note 3 is running my own SkyHigh kernel built from official Samsung sources.
When I get my hands on a 8.4 LTE model, that's exactly what I'll be doing too !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not a TW issue. I think Samsung devices with Snapdragon SoC have the fully custom ROMs. Devices with the Exynos CPU's usually don't.
When it comes to roms there is one thing I look for. Speed. Unless they go crazy with colors, theming or silly fonts I don't care much how it looks since I use a launcher anyway. Although I enjoy CM I miss the Samsung features such as split screen.
I would make Alliance rom for the tab s just need to afford one lol ?
When is development for the device going to pick up? There's not much out there! I know it just came out but I expected more. I installed the Sky high Kernel after I rooted and I really like it. I have my A15 cores overclocked to 2.1GHz and have all cores undervolted, as well as overclocked the GPU and the device is totally stable!! My only issue with root/SkyHigh kernel (not sure which is the issue) is that my screen mirroring does not work. It will try to connect and say hardware issue. Anyways, everyone just post your thoughts, opinions and such about the device and development. I'd love to hear ideas and info out there. This device is AmAzInG!
Yep the 8.4 got a kernel but nary a peep on any rom activity. I think the problem is that most developers that wanted a high res tab like this already bought the Pro model and are not upgrading to the S.
I'm waiting on someone to port CM over so I can go pure Android and get rid of this excessive Touchwiz javascript lag on pageloads. For that I'd happily give up the gimmicky stuff like split screen that I rarely use anyway.
mitchellvii said:
Yep the 8.4 got a kernel but nary a peep on any rom activity. I think the problem is that most developers that wanted a high res tab like this already bought the Pro model and are not upgrading to the S.
I'm waiting on someone to port CM over so I can go pure Android and get rid of this excessive Touchwiz javascript lag on pageloads. For that I'd happily give up the gimmicky stuff like split screen that I rarely use anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm??? Good luck.
mitchellvii said:
Yep the 8.4 got a kernel but nary a peep on any rom activity. I think the problem is that most developers that wanted a high res tab like this already bought the Pro model and are not upgrading to the S.
I'm waiting on someone to port CM over so I can go pure Android and get rid of this excessive Touchwiz javascript lag on pageloads. For that I'd happily give up the gimmicky stuff like split screen that I rarely use anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally have been a fan of the Touchwiz UI. And actually like and use a lot of its features. This is a very capable tablet and I think devs will arise soon.
suzook said:
Cm??? Good luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not? The Tab Pro line has CM.
There will be more development when we have a working recovery. No one really wants to drop mods if there's no way to flash them. Hopefully Team Win will read my email.
mitchellvii said:
Why not? The Tab Pro line has CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the devs just laid out good $ for the pro....its gonna be a while we get any good devs. Just enjoy touchwiz and root.
12MaNy said:
There will be more development when we have a working recovery. No one really wants to drop mods if there's no way to flash them. Hopefully Team Win will read my email.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Philz recovery please.
suzook said:
All the devs just laid out good $ for the pro....its gonna be a while we get any good devs. Just enjoy touchwiz and root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S line is better than the Pro, right?
Stupid1337deer said:
The S line is better than the Pro, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other than the screen? Same. Unless a Dev is really wanting amoled screen, we might be Sol for a while. Sammy needs to stop making new tabs every few months.
suzook said:
Other than the screen? Same. Unless a Dev is really wanting amoled screen, we might be Sol for a while. Sammy needs to stop making new tabs every few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I love the screen lol.
mitchellvii said:
Why not? The Tab Pro line has CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, only the Qualcomm based Snapdragons, not Exynos based models like the Tab S.
Freakstyler said:
No, only the Qualcomm based Snapdragons, not Exynos based models like the Tab S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ur right. Forgot about the Exynos thing.
I'll tell you this,if we get anxious about a new device and the possible abilities. so will the devs
Recovery works well so it won't be long
Nexus 5 via Tapatalk
Beans is looking to bring his super fine Alliance rom to our tab. First he looking for donations to help him buy one. He's a stand up guy so any money you give him, will go towards product purchase and development.
Sent from my Alliance Galaxy S5.
suzook said:
Other than the screen? Same. Unless a Dev is really wanting amoled screen, we might be Sol for a while. Sammy needs to stop making new tabs every few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would disagree. It's better looking, lighter. Software and hardware perform much better
Sent from my SM-T800 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
---------- Post added at 04:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:05 PM ----------
Rooting and recovery can be done in minutes that's got to be a good sign
Sent from my SM-T800 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I'm just waiting on a deodexed ROM for T700. Then I'll start theming.
Hello guys,
As I couldn't find any topic about this I decided to create one.
Will note 4 exynos version ever get 64 bit enable.
I don't think it will get officially from Samsung. But is it really possible to port from S6?
Is there any dev working on this?
Cheers!
Dont expect it bro, it wont be enabled by Samsung because.. its gonna be a Note 5 feature.
well, I guess porting a future rom like Note 5 or GS6 and a 64bit kernel will do the job, we have amazing devs here, this is all im dreaming off...my 2 cents
I would love to see this happening.
I would like to see somebody porting the S6 Kernel to Note 4, but there are people saying that there are way too much difference from our 5344 to the 7420.
Another way to go would be porting from Tab S 10.5 which also has the 5433, If Samsung ever launch a 64 bit Kernel for that device.
Will this help
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/9/1036
Sent from my SM-N910C using XDA Free mobile app
How to apply this patch?
Sent from my N910c
duvalbmarley said:
Will this help
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/9/1036
Sent from my SM-N910C using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you please explain to a noob what exactly is this patch?
RaphaDL said:
Could you please explain to a noob what exactly is this patch?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has to be implemented into a kernel
Sent from my SM-N910C using XDA Free mobile app
Best bet is to get a Galaxy S6 Edge if you want a good phone with 64bit.
I thought we pretty much got over this topic in the Snapdragon vs. Exynos thread, I said many times don't expect Samsung to implement 64bit in the Note 4 Exynos.
POLO_i780 said:
Best bet is to get a Galaxy S6 Edge if you want a good phone with 64bit.
I thought we pretty much got over this topic in the Snapdragon vs. Exynos thread, I said many times don't expect Samsung to implement 64bit in the Note 4 Exynos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No doubts Samsung will never implement 64bit in Note 4 officially.
The question that remains is. Is it possible for some dev to do it?
x64 wouldn't even make much of a difference, it's more marketing than actual relevant improvement... But whatever, still an improvement.
The SoC is theoretically capable, so, even if it is unlikely to get it from a S6 port, it isn't impossible.
Samsung porting the device to x64? No. They'll sell the Note 5 as a x64 device.
jvtrigo said:
No doubts Samsung will never implement 64bit in Note 4 officially.
The question that remains is. Is it possible for some dev to do it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a question for you. Why do you want your phone 64-bit enabled?
Archiimonde said:
Just a question for you. Why do you want your phone 64-bit enabled?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HI Archiimonde,
This tread is not to know why I want it enable and the benefits or non benefits of having it.
This tread is to know if it is doable and if there is anyone working on it.
Regards
jvtrigo said:
No doubts Samsung will never implement 64bit in Note 4 officially.
The question that remains is. Is it possible for some dev to do it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course it is possible for a dev to do it, but it takes a lot of time and going by the lack of kernel devs developing kernel's for the 910C I'd argue that no one is willing to take on such a project, especially considering it won't bring any major performance improvements. If say there was a nice reward someone might want to spend the time, but as it stands right now, this section is severely lacking in devs.
Toss3 said:
Of course it is possible for a dev to do it, but it takes a lot of time and going by the lack of kernel devs developing kernel's for the 910C I'd argue that no one is willing to take on such a project, especially considering it won't bring any major performance improvements. If say there was a nice reward someone might want to spend the time, but as it stands right now, this section is severely lacking in devs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, I will be the first one to donate, maybe in the future we can open a donation thread, I know im not alone on this one, a lot of people wants to see what this phone is capable of, also I guess porting a Note 5 rom will be less trouble than a Gs6, only time will tell, but I have my hopes :fingers-crossed:
hhhmmmm i really like to have this 64bit active on my N910C too but getting CM official is more exciting to have
I strongly feel that people have no clue what the benefit of 64 bit enabled note 4 would be, but at least it gives a reason to be unsatisfied.
v1rtu4l said:
I strongly feel that people have no clue what the benefit of 64 bit enabled note 4 would be, but at least it gives a reason to be unsatisfied.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's like when they scream "WHY NOT 4GB RAM???", when they at the same time try to use as little as possible...
Toss3 said:
Of course it is possible for a dev to do it, but it takes a lot of time and going by the lack of kernel devs developing kernel's for the 910C I'd argue that no one is willing to take on such a project, especially considering it won't bring any major performance improvements. If say there was a nice reward someone might want to spend the time, but as it stands right now, this section is severely lacking in devs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm gonna take a look at this when I'm back home later tonight. But I honestly doubt the success of it.. The Exy is already not documented that well and I have only found some parts hinting to 64bit support when developing for it. But I'll give it a try [emoji16]
Powered by SimplRom and SimplKernel.
I know this is early. Lol I know. I was just curious of anyone's heard anything about it yet. I'm going to upgrade to the GS6 but only when CM gets released. I refuse to use TW. And now that Google has abandoned the GPe program this makes it even harder to upgrade.
So.. any news?
If you bought the S6 expecting a ton of development you'll be very disappointed. ..
mikeyinid said:
If you bought the S6 expecting a ton of development you'll be very disappointed. ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's quite a daft thing to say considering the Galaxy S line is right behind the Nexus when it comes to development popularity..
jeffreylin_ said:
I don't think there's much support for the exynos processor yet. You could always try building it yourself and reporting back though .
Sent from my SM-G920T using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha no lol I'm just really bored with my S4 and want to upgrade but realized I'd be sacrificing a lot of functionality if I did. Since you good people have adopted the GS6 early I thought you'd be up to snuff on any development news for it. No worries though. I got some pondering to do.
By the time your done pondering on S6 / cm, will be looking at the next great thing SG9 .
Lol.
Pp.
Sheeeeeet ain't nuttin happenin'
Why would you want to buy a galaxy s5/6 and put cyanogenmod on it? Are you not buying it for the camera/thumb print scanner or samsung pay which will suck or not work at all on cm? If you want cm so bad other flagship phones cover that nich much better. You buy a expensive phone and make all the features that make it expensive useless, makes no sense to me.
Nope I'm not buying it for the thumb scanner, or Samsung pay. Everything I need, CM gives me. Have been using it since CM7 and has given me everything I want.
Stock Android>
In my opinion at least. Battery life is much better, OS is more responsive. And as far as I have seen for myself there is no difference between picture quality between TW and stock Android.
I'm not totally new to compiling CM for devices, as I compiled the sources for the Samsung i9100 and Motorola titan before. However starting development on a new device is a bit more challenging. Are there people who can help with starting this build? I already found this CM wiki page, but it kinda assumes you know what you're looking for when filling in the blanks. (or toe be more precise, know where to look in the locations for the required values)
It would also be nice to work together with someone who developed for a device before.
T_I said:
I'm not totally new to compiling CM for devices, as I compiled the sources for the Samsung i9100 and Motorola titan before. However starting development on a new device is a bit more challenging. Are there people who can help with starting this build? I already found this CM wiki page, but it kinda assumes you know what you're looking for when filling in the blanks. (or toe be more precise, know where to look in the locations for the required values)
It would also be nice to work together with someone who developed for a device before.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since it comes with an Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chip it seems to be impossible at the moment. Samsung didn't release all the documentation of the chip. I hope someone will be able to get something going, even for the exynos 7420 on my Galaxy S6
bassie1988 said:
Since it comes with an Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chip it seems to be impossible at the moment. Samsung didn't release all the documentation of the chip. I hope someone will be able to get something going, even for the exynos 7420 on my Galaxy S6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm, this one is more difficult then the Exynos 5 in the T800? (cm12.1 is being build for that tablet) There also is an Optimalrom and a custom Kernel for this device... I'd think it should be possible.
I don't know if it is more difficult. The optimalrom is just a debloated and deodexed rom, still close to touchwiz. Cyanogenmod uses a whole other kind of building. Kernels are a bit modifies, but there is no heavy overclocking or undervolting possible yet.
Has anyone consulted the guys that worked on the Tab S version? They might be of some help.
Sent from my not-so-stock SM-T810
The international Note 4 is the only other device with the Exynos that is in the S2
Look at teameos.org, they have their own builds for the note 4 exynos. Not cm12, but you may be able to find whatever missing pieces you need to work on it
T_I said:
I'm not totally new to compiling CM for devices, as I compiled the sources for the Samsung i9100 and Motorola titan before. However starting development on a new device is a bit more challenging. Are there people who can help with starting this build? I already found this CM wiki page, but it kinda assumes you know what you're looking for when filling in the blanks. (or toe be more precise, know where to look in the locations for the required values)
It would also be nice to work together with someone who developed for a device before.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm buying the 8' version this week. I hope to achieve some development on it.
Broncos15 said:
Look at teameos.org, they have their own builds for the note 4 exynos. Not cm12, but you may be able to find whatever missing pieces you need to work on it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm planning to use their sources for the build.
CTXz, Great to see you here! Hopefully you'll have some success rather than the Tab 4?. Can't wait to see what you can truly achieve!
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
They also support the exynos 5433 with their new marshmallow development
CTXz said:
I'm buying the 8' version this week. I hope to achieve some development on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you mind if I tag along to see if I can get your result running on my 9.7?
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
T_I said:
Would you mind if I tag along to see if I can get your result running on my 9.7?
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just picked it up today. I guess that should be possible. They use the same specs right?
This is exciting. I'm available for help. I've got an 8.
CTXz said:
Just picked it up today. I guess that should be possible. They use the same specs right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I could find the only difference is battery capacity. (sorry for the late reply, I've been busy with a job transition)
CTXz said:
I'm buying the 8' version this week. I hope to achieve some development on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any progress??
suzook said:
Any progress??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check my dev post in the General section for progress
Just released CM 12.1 in the android development section
Wow, wish someone would port this for 810!
CTXz said:
Just released CM 12.1 in the android development section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm going to nick your sources and see if I can compile.
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk