Database Develop

[DEV][G925F] CyanogenMod 12.1 Development

Hello there, it's time to get this rolling somewhere.
This is a Development-Thread. Please don't post if you aren't a developer.
What this IS
This is a Development thread, a platform for developers to discuss the development of CyanogenMod for the G925F. It's made so that we can get this working, fix up the problems - because there will be severe ones - and achieve a working official Rom at some point.
At the moment it's @OldDroid and me with help, but it would be awesome if interested devs would join in so that we can make this a team effort.
In short, it's a Dev-Thread in a dev section.
Right now it doesn't work and I'm not sure that it will work.
What this IS NOT
This is NOT a working Rom. Not even close. I can only link you to the kernel repo and soon to device and vendor, as they are almost completed for a first try.
And yes, there is no download link for the Rom. Because there isn't anything you could download yet.
This is also NOT intended as a Q&A thread. Please don't ask if your variant will be supported, I will respond by trolling. Firstand only priority is to get this running, then we'll talk about variants.
And ETA is an evil word with no meaning here. I work slowly, deal with it
Where are we currently?
Much further than a day ago
Thanks to @OldDroid, we've teamed up
All the links you want (minus the download link :angel
device: (soon, almost complete)
https://gitlab.com/mythos234/device_samsung_zeroltexx
vendor:
https://gitlab.com/mythos234/vendor_samsung_zerolte
kernel:
https://gitlab.com/mythos234/zerolte-kernel-CM
Once available, buggy alpha builds will be posted here
///
vendor and device will soon be pushed to my github
​

Reserved

i'll join you ... also started working on cm12.1 for s6 edge 5 days ago (currently in england with my school class)

vendor is setup
OldDroid said:
i'll join you ... also started working on cm12.1 for s6 edge 5 days ago (currently in england with my school class)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome aboard then
vendor is finally setup and good to go!
https://github.com/mythos234/vendor_samsung_zerolte
It's apparently not without some minor casualties, but we got it. Huge thanks to @RaymanFX, he's helping me, since I'm not that much into CM building yet and I'm also basing this project on his CM for the N910C, which's 5433 is darn similar to our 7420, so we got a pretty good base to begin with.

add me as participant to the repos ^^
https://github.com/OldDroid

OldDroid said:
add me as participant to the repos ^^
https://github.com/OldDroid
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done for all the 3 of them

Looks like I killed Bluetooth for now (lol). Other than that it's slow but steady progress.

mythos234 said:
Looks like I killed Bluetooth for now (lol). Other than that it's slow but steady progress.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean "killed"? Killed the chip or wiped the MAC addr. or something?

nasko_spasko said:
What do you mean "killed"? Killed the chip or wiped the MAC addr. or something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm currently building the Rom with completely removed Bluetooth support

First Build is compiled and ready for a test.. But I can't install the zip. This would be hillarious if it wasn't so annoying

mythos234 said:
Besides I said it can't be installed Hard to test something you can't even install
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that there was a mistake in the partition sizes.. /system was declared as 4.1GB, but it's only 3.6GB. Recompiling with a new value, should be able to flash it then

Good luck develop without documentation for exynos chipset.
But can you tell us more in details how porting works and what are the challenges with it.
Is it hard to develop a rom without samsung binary files and drivers? I know they are proprietary and closed soruce.
If just Samsung could be more developer friendly like Sony.
We can request source for closed binaries here, http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=inquiryView, most likely they wont answer

Aircondition said:
Good luck develop without documentation for exynos chipset.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The lack of drivers makes this a fun exercise almost Where's be the challenge if everything was easy...?

Aircondition said:
Good luck develop without documentation for exynos chipset.
But can you tell us more in details how porting works and what are the challenges with it.
Is it hard to develop a rom without samsung binary files and drivers? I know they are proprietary and closed soruce.
If just Samsung could be more developer friendly like Sony.
We can request source for closed binaries here, http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=inquiryView, most likely they wont answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't say what the challenges here will be, since I couldn't manage to even flash it yet - Second build is compiling since hours now. For now it's using all the proprietrary stuff we managed to grab and some additional stuff from the 5433 CM. But without booting it's hard to tell what won't work and might present a challenge ^^ From what I saw it'll be tough to just get the modem running. The hard part is to write the drivers yourself

mythos234 said:
I can't say what the challenges here will be, since I couldn't manage to even flash it yet - Second build is compiling since hours now. For now it's using all the proprietrary stuff we managed to grab and some additional stuff from the 5433 CM. But without booting it's hard to tell what won't work and might present a challenge ^^ From what I saw it'll be tough to just get the modem running. The hard part is to write the drivers yourself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's interesting that you can use drivers from 5433, which is a 32bit platform. Most drivers are not compatible when you switch from 32bit to 64bit if I am right?
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

lch920619x said:
It's interesting that you can use drivers from 5433, which is a 32bit platform. Most drivers are not compatible when you switch from 32bit to 64bit if I am right?
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a base to know how to do it, obviously we can't just use drivers for a different chipset

Updated the /system size in the BoardConfig and at least it flashes. But it doesn't want to boot for some reason yet.

mythos234 said:
Updated the /system size in the BoardConfig and at least it flashes. But it doesn't want to boot for some reason yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have the 5.1.1 boot loader and are using 5.0.2 as a base. Sboot will not boot it. As a fyi. It checks Linux versions.

-Mr. X- said:
If you have the 5.1.1 boot loader and are using 5.0.2 as a base. Sboot will not boot it. As a fyi. It checks Linux versions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both is 5.1.1 and Sboot seems to clear the boot as well, everything seems to go fine, it just doesn't boot. :/ Trying with building the kernel during the build itself instead of using a prebuilt one and see how that goes

mythos234 said:
Both is 5.1.1 and Sboot seems to clear the boot as well, everything seems to go fine, it just doesn't boot. :/ Trying with building the kernel during the build itself instead of using a prebuilt one and see how that goes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would personally flash an Engineering boot loader while doing this, to ensure version checking is not the issue.

[ROM] [TEST] Miui 10 for Oneplus 6t

I am not responsible for anything that happens to your device.
This is a port of MIUI 10 for the op6/6t
Flash at your own risk and make sure to check what's working. Logcats would be appreciated!
Instructions:
1: Flash OxygenOS 9.0.7 twice, this is very important
2: Extract the download somewhere
3: Run the OnePlus 6t flasher (make sure phone is still in fastboot/bootloader)
4: Reboot to TWRP (fastboot boot it if it dissapeared, if you install TWRP you must install Magisk)
5: Flash or adb sideload NFC fix that is included in the download
6: Reboot and install V4A Magisk module and enable headset and speaker, this fixes audio
7: Enjoy!
Download (v3):
MOD EDIT: LINK REMOVED
What works:
Everything except stuff in what doesn't work
What doesn't work:
NFC
Flashlight toggle (3rd party apps work)
MIUI camera (3rd party apps work)
Fingerprint (top priority - @nima0003 - me)
Audio fix #2:
Credits to @dougie313
Flash viper4android module
Grab root browser
Go to vendor\lib\soundfx folder and rename or delete all files in folder
Source code: https://github.com/OnePlusOSS/android_kernel_oneplus_sdm845
Credits: @nima0003 me @ProtoDeVNan0 for the current build
Dylan Neve
Omar

What is it based on? And will you keep working on it?

dennisbednarz said:
What is it based on? And will you keep working on it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it'll be hard to do so because of school but I will. It's based off of mi 8 Dev miui (same soc)

nima0003 said:
Yeah, it'll be hard to do so because of school but I will. It's based off of mi 8 Dev miui (same soc)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, so it doesn't use OxygenOS as a base?
I'm personally very interested in a MIUI ROM for the OP6T and seeing that someone is willing to work on it makes me pretty happy.
What about features like the mute switch and in-display fingerprint sensor?

dennisbednarz said:
Ah, so it doesn't use OxygenOS as a base?
I'm personally very interested in a MIUI ROM for the OP6T and seeing that someone is willing to work on it makes me pretty happy.
What about features like the mute switch and in-display fingerprint sensor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's uses AOSP as the base rom, I'm pretty sure alert slider doesn't work yet, hell I'm not sure it even boots yet. But if someone is able to test and it boots stable I'll get to work on those type of things.

nima0003 said:
It's uses AOSP as the base rom, I'm pretty sure alert slider doesn't work yet, hell I'm not sure it even boots yet. But if someone is able to test and it boots stable I'll get to work on those type of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My 6T is my daily driver. I may back everything up later and test it out.
Wouldn't it be easier to use OOS as the base for better performance, easier porting of features and so on? Would also make most kernels compatible.

Am I correct in assuming this supports treble? If so, I'm sure it'll make it easier to focus on 6/6t features being added rather than worrying about troubleshooting compatibility ??

champ784 said:
Am I correct in assuming this supports treble? If so, I'm sure it'll make it easier to focus on 6/6t features being added rather than worrying about troubleshooting compatibility ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is treble based, but I didn't even think of the basic bootable gsi. I'll look more into this, thanks for the idea.

dennisbednarz said:
My 6T is my daily driver. I may back everything up later and test it out.
Wouldn't it be easier to use OOS as the base for better performance, easier portion of features and so on? Would also make most kernels compatible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes that's a great idea actually, I was just worried some framework stuff would get in the way but maybe not.

nima0003 said:
Yes it is treble based, but I didn't even think of the basic bootable gsi. I'll look more into this, thanks for the idea.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure thing! We finally got treble support via lineage os for the Moto Z2 Force, which really helped keeping the device alive. Also makes flashing a TON easier, so maybe it's a good place to start

I'm downloading to test, report back in a bit.

champ784 said:
Sure thing! We finally got treble support via lineage os for the Moto Z2 Force, which really helped keeping the device alive. Also makes flashing a TON easier, so maybe it's a good place to start
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My dad traded his z2 force for a 6t. Rom support was good but everything was messed up, camera didn't focus, no safteynet...

nima0003 said:
My dad traded his z2 force for a 6t. Rom support was good but everything was messed up, camera didn't focus, no safteynet...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are workarounds, but I think it being one of the earlier devices having A/B partitions and basically being abandoned by Moto made it a task. I still have mine, but I wonder if there's something wrong with my device because I can't really flash anything beside rooted stock Rom, which leads me to think it's just a tedious device and I'd rather focus on my new 6t which is FAR superior in every way!

champ784 said:
There are workarounds, but I think it being one of the earlier devices having A/B partitions and basically being abandoned by Moto made it a task. I still have mine, but I wonder if there's something wrong with my device because I can't really flash anything beside rooted stock Rom, which leads me to think it's just a tedious device and I'd rather focus on my new 6t which is FAR superior in every way!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah same thing happened to my Xperia xc, I could only flash stock rom, not even rooted.

Flashing failed, error: invalid zip file format.

Dark Nightmare said:
Flashing failed, error: invalid zip file format.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great, thank you, working on it.

You would be my hero
It is great to see other types of roms, instead of only los type roms. Great to switch between them over time.

nima0003 said:
Yes that's a great idea actually, I was just worried some framework stuff would get in the way but maybe not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully not. Lot's of people prefer stock-based ROMs specifically for the reason that they're usually more stable, almost always better performant and always better for battery (with the exception of TouchWiz). And the whole feature thing is also useful.
Lot's of people base the ROMs of Lineage as it usually has hardware specific support, but as we don't have official lineage yet and it would still be a lesser experience than a stock ROM, I strongly advocate for the OOS base.
Wish I could help out but I'm not a developer. If you need something designed, contact someone at Xiaomi, OnePlus or Google, or if you need some piece of code some person is sitting on, let me know (on Twitter or Telegram @dennisbednarz as i don't use the forum DM system).

So basically you just ported the OS and want testers? As of now, OP6T is just 3 weeks old and hardly would anyone dare to try something that says 'I highly doubt it'll work' in the OP.

Can Not installed
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using XDA-Developers Legacy app

Question Any dev working on TWRP?

If not, anyone can make a bount?

matheus_sc said:
If not, anyone can make a bount?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Surely they are already working on it. But it just takes some time. At the moment everything is working optimally despite fastboot. Even root is possible.

pittrich said:
Surely they are already working on it. But it just takes some time. At the moment everything is working optimally despite fastboot. Even root is possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know i use xiaomi eu already. Only update is pain to ass

wait for it

Rumour has it some chinese dev is working on it

Any news?

matheus_sc said:
Any news?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still no sign.... Orangefox also quiet...
The guy who made lots of xiaomi TWRP recoveries stopped developing.

... are kernel (or device/vendor) repos released for it?
This would help.
Do we have TWRP and/or released kernel sources from other Qualcom 888 based devices out there?

raupe said:
... are kernel (or device/vendor) repos released for it?
This would help.
Do we have TWRP and/or released kernel sources from other Qualcom 888 based devices out there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This?
Xiaomi Mi 11 kernel source code is out, the device is codenamed "venus" - Gizmochina
Yesterday, Xiaomi announced Mi 11 as the world’s first smartphone powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. The handset already went for pre-order soon after the launch and is set to go on sale for the first time on January 1. Ahead of its sale, the company has even released this device’s kernel...
www.gizmochina.com

I read on Xiaomi.eu somewhere that there are issues with how the partitions are made and TWRP is very difficult to make for this. They said it's gonna take either a very long time before a recovery is made, or maybe not even at all.

Danacy said:
I read on Xiaomi.eu somewhere that there are issues with how the partitions are made and TWRP is very difficult to make for this. They said it's gonna take either a very long time before a recovery is made, or maybe not even at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah they changed everything over to GKI 1.0 and no one seems to be supporting it, although they found somewhere on a Chinese site a recovery that works (TWRP) if you boot it (don't flash it) and unencrypts the data. It's in the XDA forums now.

[TWRP] [venus] TWRP Recovery for Mi 11
REMOVED! Use this instead : https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/recovery-11-official-teamwin-recovery-project.4374109/
forum.xda-developers.com

mslezak said:
[TWRP] [venus] TWRP Recovery for Mi 11
REMOVED! Use this instead : https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/recovery-11-official-teamwin-recovery-project.4374109/
forum.xda-developers.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

*justintime* said:
Still no sign.... Orangefox also quiet...
The guy who made lots of xiaomi TWRP recoveries stopped developing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah Mauronofrio is out, too much work for no return. He was pretty much the last standing open-source TWRP dev out there for tons of devices. The ones from China never get source released... Which would mean that someone would have to pickup the TWRP project and re-engineer it to fit the new GKI 1.0 then 2.0 platforms that run off that ACK. That's a lot of work. I'm talking about keeping the TWRP project open-source. It would very nice if Google stepped in since they are experts on the new format, but no such luck.

mslezak said:
Yeah they changed everything over to GKI 1.0 and no one seems to be supporting it, although they found somewhere on a Chinese site a recovery that works (TWRP) if you boot it (don't flash it) and unencrypts the data. It's in the XDA forums now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, that would explain also the lack of custom ROMs? But I read that the source code is released, even before the device was launched. Isn't there GKI-support to be found in there?

Danacy said:
Interesting, that would explain also the lack of custom ROMs? But I read that the source code is released, even before the device was launched. Isn't there GKI-support to be found in there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they released source there are just no instructions anywhere on how to build the kernel #1 and the GKI modules #2 and combine into a build.

The new Xiaomi.eu weekly includes TWRP for Venus (Mi11) as well as Star (Mi 11 Lite 5G, Mi 11 Pro, Mi 11 Ultra, MIX FOLD) (it's a bootable TWRP, but persists after installation). Seems last week's has added Alioth (Mi 10S, Redmi K40). So I would expect a TWRP for Haydn to show up soon in the weekly Xiaomi.eu releases. Seems they forgot the haydn doesn't have TWRP yet so you can't actually install it! Tried the updater app no go, it can't boot to recovery because they don't have one yet, even though on Xiaomi.eu they say it's available, can't find it anywhere.
BTW the only TWRPs I can actually find are for Venus and Star.
haydn TWRP is not working: https://androidfilehost.com/?fid=14943124697586336730 remember: fastboot boot twrp-3.5.1-haydn.img ... although I tried everything, this TWRP just doesn't work - you boot right into the system after the fastboot boot step. Tried everything I can think of, always boots to system. Guess it's still a waiting game...

mslezak said:
Yes they released source there are just no instructions anywhere on how to build the kernel #1 and the GKI modules #2 and combine into a build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just one more question since this has been bothering me; what would be needed from Xiaomi? Instructions on how to build the kernel? Have they ever done this before about something like this? Like, is it a reasonable thing to ask them to release instructions? I know some people working there, I could forward the request.

Well I've run this by many many devs.
The issue with the GKI 1.0 and ACK is that you must download the entire AOSP build environment and make sure it works with the separate ACK (Android Common Kernel) and then properly loads the GKI modules from a separate build step. Together they make 1 kernel. This ACK per Linux Version and across vendors should be AOSP and identical. Therefore, a single build should work across all Linux 5.4 based kernels.
But... most devs are just skipping AOSP and inlining the GKI modules so they can have 1 build step. Not exactly what Google intended, but way less storage, and you can use Clang or GCC or whatever you want.
I think what OEMs are posting is merely the entire combined source code, no 2 step build process. Only a single file for the QGKI config portion. Which won't build your GKI modules as it comes. A build script for this (Q)GKI portion would be extremely beneficial.
If any OEM walks through the build steps 1) how to create only the QGKI modules and 2) how to assemble them into 1 kernel with the ACK, that would be great for devs. It just hasn't happened. So we get hacked kernels for the 888 running Linux 5.4.
The Generic Kernel Image (GKI) project | Android Open Source Project
source.android.com

mslezak said:
Well I've run this by many many devs.
The issue with the GKI 1.0 and ACK is that you must download the entire AOSP build environment and make sure it works with the separate ACK (Android Common Kernel) and then properly loads the GKI modules from a separate build step. Together they make 1 kernel. This ACK per Linux Version and across vendors should be AOSP and identical. Therefore, a single build should work across all Linux 5.4 based kernels.
But... most devs are just skipping AOSP and inlining the GKI modules so they can have 1 build step. Not exactly what Google intended, but way less storage, and you can use Clang or GCC or whatever you want.
I think what OEMs are posting is merely the entire combined source code, no 2 step build process. Only a single file for the QGKI config portion. Which won't build your GKI modules as it comes. A build script for this (Q)GKI portion would be extremely beneficial.
If any OEM walks through the build steps 1) how to create only the QGKI modules and 2) how to assemble them into 1 kernel with the ACK, that would be great for devs. It just hasn't happened. So we get hacked kernels for the 888 running Linux 5.4.
The Generic Kernel Image (GKI) project | Android Open Source Project
source.android.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, I see. Thank you for your reply. I am going to see how far I can get this. Tnx again!

[TREBLE][10.0] Q-based vendor (vndk29) implementation

Thread template from Flex1911's thread.
Info:
Based on Flex1911 treble related commits
Q-based vendor up to date with Lineage 17.1 device trees and kernel
Instructions:
I'm not going to provide them, just head here instead: https://forum.xda-developers.com/mi-a1/how-to/treble-stock-to-treble-everything-to-t3793734
As usual, it requires repartitioning.
Downloads:
vendor_vndk29_LOS17.1_20210427.img and boot_vndk29_LOS17.1_20210427.img
Source code:
Kernel Patch
Common MSM8953 tree
Device tree

Great, I'll test these images as soon as I can!
Have you tested them in any GSI?
Note: Although the ROM is from 2021, the boot and vendor images were named as from 2020. Is it right?

santosst said:
Have you tested them in any GSI?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only on Android 10 Phh AOSP
santosst said:
Although the ROM is from 2021, the boot and vendor images were named as from 2020. Is it right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, didn't notice that
Already corrected dates, all from 2021.

zignas said:
Only on Android 10 Phh AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, ok, I'll probably try them on eremitein's LiR, that's the GSI I'm daily driving for some weeks.
zignas said:
Thanks, didn't notice that
Already corrected dates, all from 2021.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, no problem lol, thanks for correcting the dates

santosst said:
I'll probably try them on eremitein's LiR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bluetooth is dead on android 11 GSI's
Temporary solution (untill i make update):
Delete "Bluetooth__auto_generated_rro_vendor.apk" in /vendor/overlay

zignas said:
Bluetooth is dead on android 11 GSI's
Temporary solution (untill i make update):
Delete "Bluetooth__auto_generated_rro_vendor.apk" in /vendor/overlay
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, thanks!! I'll install your vendor tonight and try to use Bluetooth.
I'm using the vndk-lite version, so maybe Bluetooth works ok, but I'll try and report to you
Edit: In fact, Bluetooth doesn't work out-of-the-box, so I needed to delete the Bluetooth overlay as you said, and after that, it worked well.

thank you for your work, i'm currently using ExpressLuke's PixelExperience 10 GSI with your boot & vendor, it has great performance with ondemand governor (although it hurts battery life a bit). Also everything works without a problem

thanks for you work!
as a new treble user, I have one doubt: what is the difference between this vendor implementation and the ones released by other developers? I've been using sooti's vendor for a while and did not have a single problem but it seems old looking at filename (don't really know if date is relevant btw)

portox said:
what is the difference between this vendor implementation and the ones released by other developers? I've been using sooti's vendor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't check his sources, but as i know he using old pie vendor (with pie blobs, etc, etc).
And if ROM ( semiGSI as example, builded not from sources) doesn't contain VNDK28 (pie "level") compability layer it simply doesn't boot at all.

Question LineageOS for A33

Has anyone created a lineage rom for the A33? Can't find it.
To be clear, for me this forum is like a maze, i was previously searching for a rom for the galaxy S7 and could not find it anywhere but then a forum member sent me a link to an unofficial build which i installed and it works perfectly, so i really dont care about unofficial builds, i will take anything over the preinstalled google spyware, if you know where to find a lineageos build for the A33 please share it!!

I'm not even sure if there's a custom recovery for A33 yet, let alone a Lineage build. You could maybe attempt to patch stock recovery to allow fastbootd and use to to try and flash Lineage GSI as system.img
It's the only way I see it may work

ShaDisNX255 said:
I'm not even sure if there's a custom recovery for A33 yet, let alone a Lineage build. You could maybe attempt to patch stock recovery to allow fastbootd and use to to try and flash Lineage GSI as system.img
It's the only way I see it may work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did not expect lineageos to be available for a very new phone, this is the only phone i can get for free from my provider that's why i asked.
As recovery i could use TWRP, or not?
Sorry i don't know what you mean by lineage GSI, could you please explain? What does GSI stand for and where can i get it?
Edit: just noticed you made a rom (RayOS) or atleast ported it for the A52, that's interesting!
I never heared about RayOS, is it similar to lineageos? Is there a official website?

For starters, let me know if you have a U.S. phone because if you do this whole conversation is moot.
Librem5OS said:
As recovery i could use TWRP, or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I don't see TWRP in this forum so, I'm guessing it's still not available. I've seen a few people patch their stock recovery to allow fastboot commands so, maybe that'll work.
Librem5OS said:
Sorry i don't know what you mean by lineage GSI, could you please explain? What does GSI stand for and where can i get it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GSI is a Generic System Image. It can count as a "ROM" but it's not for a specific device. Without going too much into detail, ever since Google released Oreo they changed the way of how it works. Project Treble (you can look it up for more details) now separates the system and where the system takes its hw libs (called vendor). Because of this, it has opened the gate for GSI to act as ROMs. Developers can build a generic Lineage (or Lineage-like) system and it can pretty much work on most devices that have Project Treble (this is mandatory for devices released with Oreo and onwards). So, you can look up Lineage GSI on google and you'll be able to find it. The only downside to this as opposed to actual ROMs for devices is that since it's generic, some features may work for some brands and some features are broken on other brands. Unfortunately, every OEM has taken it upon themselves to implement Project Treble as they please and there are a few differences here and there, therefore GSI won't work the same for all brands.
Sorry to dump all this information to you, I hope you're still with me here lol. From what I've seen, GSI that are based on phhusson (a developer who is also known as phh) work pretty well on Samsung devices, so if you're interested you can look for GSI that say that they're based on his work.
Librem5OS said:
Edit: just noticed you made a rom (RayOS) or atleast ported it for the A52, that's interesting!
I never heared about RayOS, is it similar to lineageos? Is there a official website?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RayOS is OneUI based. I just took S21FE system (which has built in flagship features) and flashed them over to A-series phones which don't have most of those flagship features. Because this is Samsung to Samsung and they implement Project Treble pretty much the same across all their devices, be it mid-end or high-end, this was real easy to achieve and implement with a few fixes here and there. It's just my little personal project, I don't have a website for it.

ShaDisNX255 said:
For starters, let me know if you have a U.S. phone because if you do this whole conversation is moot.
Well I don't see TWRP in this forum so, I'm guessing it's still not available. I've seen a few people patch their stock recovery to allow fastboot commands so, maybe that'll work.
GSI is a Generic System Image. It can count as a "ROM" but it's not for a specific device. Without going too much into detail, ever since Google released Oreo they changed the way of how it works. Project Treble (you can look it up for more details) now separates the system and where the system takes its hw libs (called vendor). Because of this, it has opened the gate for GSI to act as ROMs. Developers can build a generic Lineage (or Lineage-like) system and it can pretty much work on most devices that have Project Treble (this is mandatory for devices released with Oreo and onwards). So, you can look up Lineage GSI on google and you'll be able to find it. The only downside to this as opposed to actual ROMs for devices is that since it's generic, some features may work for some brands and some features are broken on other brands. Unfortunately, every OEM has taken it upon themselves to implement Project Treble as they please and there are a few differences here and there, therefore GSI won't work the same for all brands.
Sorry to dump all this information to you, I hope you're still with me here lol. From what I've seen, GSI that are based on phhusson (a developer who is also known as phh) work pretty well on Samsung devices, so if you're interested you can look for GSI that say that they're based on his work.
RayOS is OneUI based. I just took S21FE system (which has built in flagship features) and flashed them over to A-series phones which don't have most of those flagship features. Because this is Samsung to Samsung and they implement Project Treble pretty much the same across all their devices, be it mid-end or high-end, this was real easy to achieve and implement with a few fixes here and there. It's just my little personal project, I don't have a website for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am from the EU so i dont have a US phone.
Im not an expert so this whole information is a little more detailed than what i usualy deal with, had to read it twice lol. How is GSI different from the default google OS? Does it have google services injected or not?
From your description it sounds like the general stock rom for android.
I will check phhusson, however if GSI has google in it im not interested, i want privacy so no google.
I also never heared about OneUI, does it or does RayOS (your work) have google services in it or is it google free? I don't necessarly need lineage as my os, anything without google spyware will do the job.
-Thank you for the reply.

Librem5OS said:
How is GSI different from the default google OS? Does it have google services injected or not?
From your description it sounds like the general stock rom for android.
I will check phhusson, however if GSI has google in it im not interested, i want privacy so no google.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the best way to answer this question is by stating that most GSI's offer both a vanilla and gapps version. Vanilla meaning no Google services on them.
Librem5OS said:
I also never heared about OneUI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OneUI is the current OS name for all Samsung phones... That's what they name their version of Android
Librem5OS said:
does RayOS (your work) have google services in it or is it google free?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I leave the Google apps on, I use them so I don't remove them.
Librem5OS said:
I don't necessarly need lineage as my os, anything without google spyware will do the job.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then when you look for GSI, search for the term vanilla.

ShaDisNX255 said:
I think the best way to answer this question is by stating that most GSI's offer both a vanilla and gapps version. Vanilla meaning no Google services on them.
OneUI is the current OS name for all Samsung phones... That's what they name their version of Android
I leave the Google apps on, I use them so I don't remove them.
Well then when you look for GSI, search for the term vanilla.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you now i know what ill have to look for!
[GSI][12] LineageOS 19.x GSI (A64B/64B)
Background: This is a natural continuation/extension of the LineageOS 18.x GSIs I've been making since 2020. LineageOS is a free, community built, aftermarket firmware distribution of Android, which is designed to increase performance and...
forum.xda-developers.com
This seems to be the generic build you where talking about?
I was just a little confused if i should visit phhs github or xda.
After all his XDA thread says: You are STRONGLY ADVISED to try PHH's AOSP of equivalent version FIRST
So i did that and this is where it takes me https://github.com/phhusson/treble_experimentations/releases/tag/v414
However all the files extensions are .xz i have no idea what that means.
When i flashed lineage it said img.tar if i remember correctly.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Whats the difference between the two red marked? one says secure img the other only img?
As they say vanilla these must be the ones without google?
Or should i download these instead? If yes which one? I have no clue what the names stand for. Noticed one says ARM and the other doesnt. However what is the difference between those and what is the difference between all arm versions and all non arm versions?

Librem5OS said:
However all the files extensions are .xz i have no idea what that means.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The .xz extension is just an .img file compressed. You need to use something like 7zip to unzip the .img file inside.
Librem5OS said:
I was just a little confused if i should visit phhs github or xda.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well as I mentioned before, many people base their work of phh. I guess this developer wants you to check phh's work first so that if it doesn't boot, you won't bother installing his work at all.
Librem5OS said:
When i flashed lineage it said img.tar if i remember correctly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tar is usually made for flashing with Odin. Looks like someone did the work of packing everything to make it easier for Samsung users to flash to their phones.

ShaDisNX255 said:
The .xz extension is just an .img file compressed. You need to use something like 7zip to unzip the .img file inside.
Well as I mentioned before, many people base their work of phh. I guess this developer wants you to check phh's work first so that if it doesn't boot, you won't bother installing his work at all.
Tar is usually made for flashing with Odin. Looks like someone did the work of packing everything to make it easier for Samsung users to flash to their phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the help.
So as the title of his post says:
[GSI][12] LineageOS 19.x GSI (A64B/64B)​That does not mention any specific device, so i asume it should be compatible with any android device.
So if i have a huawai phone with android on it, i should be able to flash this GSI on it, correct?
If yes excuse me if that sounds stupid but huawai is known to be chinese spyware, what do you think about privacy on a huawai with lineage on it? Could it be that the chinese has some shady things so deep in the phone perhaps even hardware so that even flashing a custom rom wont guarantee privacy?
Also i checked on youtube how to install GSI and the person said, flashing GSI system img only installs the system but not a boot img so i wont be able to boot, im not sure what im supposed to think about this?
For beginngers what do i need? a recovery like twrp?
A boot img?
A system img?
Is the GSI all in one or are further steps required?
Also im not sure if sourceforge is a trustworthy download option.

Librem5OS said:
[GSI][12] LineageOS 19.x GSI (A64B/64B)​That does not mention any specific device, so i asume it should be compatible with any android device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, also have to make sure you're using the correct system. As far as I know, there are arm builds, a64 builds and arm64 builds. That A64B/64B in the title makes me thin they're only offering a64 and arm64 builds, download the one according to your device. I don't know in which category A33 falls so I can't help you there. My first guess is always arm64.
Librem5OS said:
So if i have a huawai phone with android on it, i should be able to flash this GSI on it, correct?
If yes excuse me if that sounds stupid but huawai is known to be chinese spyware, what do you think about privacy on a huawai with lineage on it? Could it be that the chinese has some shady things so deep in the phone perhaps even hardware so that even flashing a custom rom wont guarantee privacy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never owned a Huawei phone so I can't really comment if they can flash GSI flawlessly and/or if that helps with any privacy issues they may or may not have.
Librem5OS said:
Also i checked on youtube how to install GSI and the person said, flashing GSI system img only installs the system but not a boot img so i wont be able to boot, im not sure what im supposed to think about this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The boot.img is the kernel, your phone already has a stock boot.img in it, no need to worry about it for now. If you dedice to use a GSI, a common bug in Samsung phones is that you won't be able to use MTP when connecting to a PC. This is usually fixed in custom kernels specifically made for AOSP ROMs and GSIs. It's a result of Samsung like doing things their own way.
Librem5OS said:
For beginngers what do i need? a recovery like twrp?
A boot img?
A system img?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you need a recovery capable of flashing custom system.img. It can be TWRP, OrangeFox or maybe just patching your stock recovery to be able to use fastboot commands.
Boot img is optional, as I mentioned above your phone already has one so no need to worry about it
System img is obvious, yes it's the GSI itself.
Librem5OS said:
Is the GSI all in one or are further steps required?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Usually GSI have all the same steps. Flashing the system and wiping data

ShaDisNX255 said:
Well, also have to make sure you're using the correct system. As far as I know, there are arm builds, a64 builds and arm64 builds. That A64B/64B in the title makes me thin they're only offering a64 and arm64 builds, download the one according to your device. I don't know in which category A33 falls so I can't help you there. My first guess is always arm64.
I've never owned a Huawei phone so I can't really comment if they can flash GSI flawlessly and/or if that helps with any privacy issues they may or may not have.
The boot.img is the kernel, your phone already has a stock boot.img in it, no need to worry about it for now. If you dedice to use a GSI, a common bug in Samsung phones is that you won't be able to use MTP when connecting to a PC. This is usually fixed in custom kernels specifically made for AOSP ROMs and GSIs. It's a result of Samsung like doing things their own way.
Yes, you need a recovery capable of flashing custom system.img. It can be TWRP, OrangeFox or maybe just patching your stock recovery to be able to use fastboot commands.
Boot img is optional, as I mentioned above your phone already has one so no need to worry about it
System img is obvious, yes it's the GSI itself.
Usually GSI have all the same steps. Flashing the system and wiping data
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bet was also arm64, i tend to just try it. If i want to be 100% sure propably wikipedia or the manufactuers tech specs should have info on that? a64b and 64b are entirely new to me.
TWRP is capable of flashing custom roms so if twrp is released for a33 nothing stops me from downloading and flashing the arm64 gsi onto the a33 right? I think twrp has been released for the a33 after looking here https://twrp.me/Devices/Samsung/
Just a question, if it wasn't released are there people on xda pushing their own version of twrp or similar recoverys in order to allow people to flash gsi or custom lineageos builds?

Librem5OS said:
My bet was also arm64, i tend to just try it. If i want to be 100% sure propably wikipedia or the manufactuers tech specs should have info on that? a64b and 64b are entirely new to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is something I can't comment on. I know there are some apps on Playstore that tell you what type of system you can run but I don't know which can tell you accurate information (I personally don't use GSI). I wouldn't use any outside sources like Wikipedia or Google for that matter because of one small detail: Samsung's been known to put 64bit chips on their phones but force them to run in 32bits, even more on their lower end phones. A page may tell you that you have a 64bit chip but I don't think they know if it's even running in 64bits or not. Sorry, I can't be much help here.
Librem5OS said:
TWRP is capable of flashing custom roms so if twrp is released for a33 nothing stops me from downloading and flashing the arm64 gsi onto the a33 right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is correct
Librem5OS said:
I think twrp has been released for the a33 after looking here https://twrp.me/Devices/Samsung/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the TWRP available in the page you provided is not for the Galaxy A33 5G. It's actually for the Galaxy A3 (2015) whose model is A300H and for some weird reason Samsung gave it the device code-name 'a33g'. Yeah Samsung's very weird when it comes to their naming.
Librem5OS said:
Just a question, if it wasn't released are there people on xda pushing their own version of twrp or similar recoverys in order to allow people to flash gsi or custom lineageos builds?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, XDA usually has a set of requirements if you want to post something like a custom recovery. A custom recovery may already exist but it may not comply with XDA's requirements and could be a reason why it may not be posted yet. In my personal opinion, I'd download Telegram and search in public A33 Telegram groups any to see if maybe there's something in the works and/or something that could at least let you flash GSI.

ShaDisNX255 said:
This is something I can't comment on. I know there are some apps on Playstore that tell you what type of system you can run but I don't know which can tell you accurate information (I personally don't use GSI). I wouldn't use any outside sources like Wikipedia or Google for that matter because of one small detail: Samsung's been known to put 64bit chips on their phones but force them to run in 32bits, even more on their lower end phones. A page may tell you that you have a 64bit chip but I don't think they know if it's even running in 64bits or not. Sorry, I can't be much help here.
This is correct
I think the TWRP available in the page you provided is not for the Galaxy A33 5G. It's actually for the Galaxy A3 (2015) whose model is A300H and for some weird reason Samsung gave it the device code-name 'a33g'. Yeah Samsung's very weird when it comes to their naming.
Well, XDA usually has a set of requirements if you want to post something like a custom recovery. A custom recovery may already exist but it may not comply with XDA's requirements and could be a reason why it may not be posted yet. In my personal opinion, I'd download Telegram and search in public A33 Telegram groups any to see if maybe there's something in the works and/or something that could at least let you flash GSI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad you are right the twrp for the "arr" shows the first release back in 2017 so that cant be the new 5g version...
If you say samsung uses 64 chipset but forces their phones to run on 32bit (idk how that makes sense) why cant i find a arm32 anywhere? I mean could be this question is out of topic too..
I just woonder if there is even a single person who currently owns the A33 and managed to flash lineageos / gsi onto the device and if so how did they do it, either everyone with that phone is using the stock rom unless they are an expert, or there are already custom recoverys and roms available for the public.
Either way in theory the GSI for android version 12 should/could be compatible with the A33 since it is as you said a generic build, but even if that would work i obviously need a custom recovery in order to flash the system on the device, kinda surprised me you mentioned telegram, i never used it as im not really into social media. I tought if there is a custom recovery my best bet would be XDA forums.
If there is no custom recovery i guess ill have to wait for a official twrp release, or an unofficial one on XDA.

Librem5OS said:
If you say samsung uses 64 chipset but forces their phones to run on 32bit (idk how that makes sense) why cant i find a arm32 anywhere? I mean could be this question is out of topic too..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only said they've been known to on some lower end phones, not all. That's why I don't trust any website with that specific information. The reason why you aren't finding arm32 anywhere is because it's usually just referred to as arm in GSI builds.
Librem5OS said:
I just woonder if there is even a single person who currently owns the A33 and managed to flash lineageos / gsi onto the device and if so how did they do it, either everyone with that phone is using the stock rom unless they are an expert, or there are already custom recoverys and roms available for the public.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, can't really answer that. Maybe someone will post a way on XDA soon or maybe not.
Librem5OS said:
i obviously need a custom recovery in order to flash the system on the device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct
Librem5OS said:
kinda surprised me you mentioned telegram, i never used it as im not really into social media.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally I've seen a lot of developers share their work on Telegram first before publishing in XDA. As I mentioned before XDA has a set of requirements before being able to post something like a custom recovery . I also share my work there first so I can get people to test and report any bugs they may find before publishing a final build on XDA. Telegram is great because you don't need your phone to be on (you can use the PC client) as opposed to something like WhatsApp that is mandatory your phone be on.
Librem5OS said:
I tought if there is a custom recovery my best bet would be XDA forums.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what we all say of course lol

ShaDisNX255 said:
I only said they've been known to on some lower end phones, not all. That's why I don't trust any website with that specific information. The reason why you aren't finding arm32 anywhere is because it's usually just referred to as arm in GSI builds.
Well, can't really answer that. Maybe someone will post a way on XDA soon or maybe not.
Correct
Personally I've seen a lot of developers share their work on Telegram first before publishing in XDA. As I mentioned before XDA has a set of requirements before being able to post something like a custom recovery . I also share my work there first so I can get people to test and report any bugs they may find before publishing a final build on XDA. Telegram is great because you don't need your phone to be on (you can use the PC client) as opposed to something like WhatsApp that is mandatory your phone be on.
That's what we all say of course lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im having a problem with my old Huawai SCL-L01, this phone is slow and bad (only 1gb ram).
Atleast even when the devices is trash i wanted to install linage on it to atleast have privacy, as long as it's still working why not use it?
So the problem is i have usb debugging and oem unlock both activated, i installed adb fastboot / platformtools on my pc (which i downloaded here https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/platform-tools), i connected the phone to the pc and allowed data transfer over usb debugging by confirming the request which appears on the phone, i entered adb reboot bootloader into cmd.exe on the pc and the phone rebooted into bootloader, i then typed adb flash lineageos_rom.img
As a result instead of flashing the img, the cmd output "waiting for any device".
I dont know what is going wrong, what am i doing false in the process?
I was following the instructions here https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/index-list-of-roms-for-y6-2018.3854167/

Librem5OS said:
then typed adb flash lineageos_rom.img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you're using a adb instead of fastboot command. They're 2 different things
It's fastboot flash, not adb flash

ShaDisNX255 said:
Because you're using a adb instead of fastboot command. They're 2 different things
It's fastboot flash, not adb flash
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used: fastboot flash system recovery.img

Librem5OS said:
Thanks for the help.
So as the title of his post says:
[GSI][12] LineageOS 19.x GSI (A64B/64B)​That does not mention any specific device, so i asume it should be compatible with any android device.
So if i have a huawai phone with android on it, i should be able to flash this GSI on it, correct?
If yes excuse me if that sounds stupid but huawai is known to be chinese spyware, what do you think about privacy on a huawai with lineage on it? Could it be that the chinese has some shady things so deep in the phone perhaps even hardware so that even flashing a custom rom wont guarantee privacy?
Also i checked on youtube how to install GSI and the person said, flashing GSI system img only installs the system but not a boot img so i wont be able to boot, im not sure what im supposed to think about this?
For beginngers what do i need? a recovery like twrp?
A boot img?
A system img?
Is the GSI all in one or are further steps required?
Also im not sure if sourceforge is a trustworthy download option.
View attachment 5678691
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great to meet someone who also uses pagexray.fouanalytics.com
Yeah sourceforge is not trustworthy at all...
I always get confused by sourceforge.net and curseforge.com
One of them is owned by twitch or overwolf which are owned by amazon = bigtech.
Anyways, looking at forum.xda-developers.com makes me worry...

I believe you can use any LineageOS GSI, but you'd need to flash it in a custom recovery such as TWRP while retaining the stock kernel in /boot.