[MODULE] AdGuardDNS - Ad-free experience [UNOFFICIAL] - Magisk

Ad-free and malware-protection experience without hosts file.​
With the hosts file, internet slow down due to cpu usage for resolve domains.
AdGuard DNS is the solution.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Site and test: https://adguard.com/en/adguard-dns/overview.html
I am not affiliated in any way with the AdGuard team, if you appreciate their work just say thanks to them.
For report an ad or broken websites: https://agrd.io/report
Requirements:
- Magisk 17
- In this module AdGuard DNS uses port 5353, sometimes it can be blocked.
....something else?
BUGS (for now, some of these may have been fixed):
- It does not work with some ISPs
- It blocks internet access to public Wi-Fi hotspots
- Netflix app + Chromecast compatibility issue
- Some apps use DNS Geo-location, these may not work (like Dazn, etc.)
- You can't send MMS
- And many more...
To avoid these problems you can download DNS Changer by Blockada in Google Play store... Or if you don't care, you can use this module.
For Android Pie user: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardDNS/blob/master/README.md#dns-over-tls
NO WHITELIST FEATURE! DON'T ASK ME TO DO IT!!
General F.A.Q.
Q: Do I need third-party apps to make it work? A: No, just install and enjoy.
Q: What is AdGuard DNS? A: AdGuard DNS is a free Domain Name System resolution system. It is an alternative solution for ad blocking and privacy protection. It provides a necessary minimum of best protection against online ads, trackers, and phishing.
Q: How does AdGuard DNS work? A: When you use AdGuard DNS, every time a website or app sends an ad request, our server sends back a null response. AdGuard has a database of domain names that serve for ad purposes, and this database is regularly updated.

Do i need third part app to work?
I Installed on Magisk

It's still showing ads.

I've been using AdAway for awhile. Today I started getting ads, in the Google feed and Firefox. I checked the lists in AdAway and even added EasyLists. Also enabled IPv6. Couldn't figure out how the ads were coming through. I happened to see this module listed in Magisk and decided to give it a try. Works great. I still see the boxes where the ads would normally load but I would rather have the empty box than an ad.

ColdUser said:
Do i need third part app to work?
I Installed on Magisk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. It does everything by itself.

As3ro said:
Ad-free and malware-protection experience without hosts file.
With Hosts file, internet slow down due to cpu usage for resolve domains.
Adguard DNS is the solution.
Site and test: https://adguard.com/en/adguard-dns/overview.html
Requirements:
- Magisk 17
- A brain
This module is based on CloudflareDNS4Magisk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After installing it as a module in magisk, is it already working? Or do i still need to install adguard apk?
Edit: didnt see previous post, my bad..

TadMSTR said:
I've been using AdAway for awhile. Today I started getting ads, in the Google feed and Firefox. I checked the lists in AdAway and even added EasyLists. Also enabled IPv6. Couldn't figure out how the ads were coming through. I happened to see this module listed in Magisk and decided to give it a try. Works great. I still see the boxes where the ads would normally load but I would rather have the empty box than an ad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only paying for AdGuard will hide those empty boxes.
Sent from my Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 using XDA Labs

Confirmed working, thanks.

Awesome, is there a whitelist feature?

As3ro said:
Nope. It does everything by itself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay thank you for quick reply.
I'm using it also on my router.. what's the difference between "our DNS servers" and "default servers"
And family protection DNS can only used on pc internet Explorer right?
Works great on my router i just set the "our DNS server"
Verstuurd vanaf mijn MI 5 met Tapatalk

diznanl said:
Awesome, is there a whitelist feature?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, there is not. The Ad-blocking works at DNS-level, It would be impossible.

ColdUser said:
Okay thank you for quick reply.
I'm using it also on my router.. what's the difference between "our DNS servers" and "default servers"
And family protection DNS can only used on pc internet Explorer right?
Works great on my router i just set the "our DNS server"
Verstuurd vanaf mijn MI 5 met Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They should be the same thing. The family protection works on every system in which the DNS are set

In which country is the DNS located? Nicosia?

gerega said:
In which country is the DNS located? Nicosia?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's located in Finland, Netherlands and Russia for now, but it works everywhere

VincentJoshuaET said:
Only paying for AdGuard will hide those empty boxes.
Sent from my Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This module just sets the AdGuardDNS servers on the device so paying for a license would do no good as that is for the mobile/desktop apps. I don't mind the empty boxes. Better than boxes filled with ads.

Had to re-do the module to get it to install but so far looks good.

daleski75 said:
Had to re-do the module to get it to install but so far looks good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, my mistake. The module is also available in Magisk Repo.

I'm still getting ads !!

adaa1262 said:
I'm still getting ads !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where? App or website?
Have you test on https://adguard.com/en/adguard-dns/overview.html ?

As3ro said:
Where? App or website?
Have you test on https://adguard.com/en/adguard-dns/overview.html ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On chrome and apps : I'm browsing XDA now and I still get ads.
I'm using the Redmi Note 5 (pro model in India) with MIUI 10 Oreo

Related

Extra Settings on Chrome

I found some extra settings on the Chromecast extension for Chrome.
So I went to my Chrome extensions window and clicked "Options" for the Google Cast extension.
In the tab, I right clicked > Inspect Element.
I noticed that a section of the page had a "display: none;" so I removed that and got this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Just wanted to share my findings in case anyone was interested .
Oh really nice find!
Just tested this and confirmed. The line you are looking for is highlighted in the image.
Needs Reciever app?
Man I thought i was onto something with the whole URL for Flinging Command.
Apparently some have seen in the SDK that an example video using the big buck bunny video url could be casted. http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2332706&page=2
USER: vshah
the sample code, for example, simply passes this URL to chromecast to play "big buck bunny"
http://clips.vorwaerts-gmbh.de/VfE_html5.mp4
if smb shares are supported by chromecast, then i see no reason why it shouldn't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also a great idea by user blackdogdeek
Forgive my possible ignorance, but couldn't you just run a web server on your smb box and give the URL of your local vid stash?
ie - pass http://192.168.1.10/public_html/vids/movie.mp4 to chromecast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So we need to figure out how to initiate the fling command? Is there a receiver app in the SDK kit or something?
I'm a total noob when it comes to this but this has my jimmies rustled and i'm excited about the possibilities.
I posted about this 2 days ago:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2379682
Google SDK
Whitelisting Chrome apps
To permit your Chrome sender application to use the SDK, you must register the application's domain in the Google Cast extension for Chrome.
Be sure you are running Chrome version 28 or later.
If you haven't restarted Chrome in a while you may be running an older version; restarting will update Chrome automatically.
In the Chrome omnibox, enter chrome://extensions, and check the Developer mode checkbox to enable developer mode.
Install the Chrome extension for Google Cast.
On the Cast icon in Chrome's upper right corner, click four (4) times.
In the Cast extension, scroll to the Developer options.
In the Cast SDK additional domains field, click Add and enter the domain of your application, for example, "www.mydomain.com."
Code your application's HTML tag as follows:
<html data-cast-api-enabled=”true”>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I couldnt get the above to work but I found it in the options by removing the display:none from <section ng-show="doubleClicks > 1" style="">
So someone who gets "White Listed" could try sending a URL to the ChromeCast?
Edit: So someone can start making a webpage that uses this correctly and just add that domain to the Chromecast extensions whitelist?
see https://developers.google.com/cast/chrome_sender
xDman11x said:
Google SDK
I couldnt get the above to work but I found it in the options by removing the display:none from <section ng-show="doubleClicks > 1" style="">
So someone who gets "White Listed" could try sending a URL to the ChromeCast?
Edit: So someone can start making a webpage that uses this correctly and just add that domain to the Chromecast extensions whitelist?
see https://developers.google.com/cast/chrome_sender
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adding the domain is just a way of telling your extension that the domain is serving a chromecast receiver. They haven't opened the floodgates for developers so they are keep everything controlled, hence the whitelist process. You do "send" a URL to the chromecast but it's really just for the chrome extension to know that a websocket can be opened for the receiver site and the client (the chrome extension).
Someone else found the same thing and posted it on Reddit. Here's the link
Also note that the user Ranek520 said: "Unfortunately, none of those advanced options are actually hooked up. The JavaScript to store or load the values is removed for the release version of the extension. That's why the values are all blank.
Source: I wrote the max frame rate option."
So currently these options do nothing.
Nice find! Thanks!
umer936 said:
Someone else found the same thing and posted it on Reddit. Here's the link
Also note that the user Ranek520 said: "Unfortunately, none of those advanced options are actually hooked up. The JavaScript to store or load the values is removed for the release version of the extension. That's why the values are all blank.
Source: I wrote the max frame rate option."
So currently these options do nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still, they are for a reason. I guess they are waiting for a future update to activate them, or may be some dormant hardware like LTE in Nexus 4.
Anyway, it opens the door to many possibilities...
Ugh I wish I could get this on Android. With certain variations of these settings, the connection is so much better on my Chromebook than it is on any of my android devices.
Thanks, very good
Enviado con mi Note 2 Lollipop

Rom Dedicated to Hotspot

Has anyone come across a ROM that's dedicated to HotSpoting?
My thoughts are this:
1) Is there anything for this phone like a SafeStrap where you can change roms just by rebooting?
2) Could a rom be written to disable pretty much everything except hotspot (cannot receive text messages or phone calls, no apks are trying to use the internet in the background, etc...)?
I don't know how to make roms, so I am not going to say it sounds easy, but it does sound much simpler than a lot of the full OS roms I see.
Thanks guys!
I mean, there're 3G router for 30 dollars that can do that, and you want to use a fully featured phone that costs 150 USD$ o more for that?
Mmmmm.....
CorneliusRox said:
Has anyone come across a ROM that's dedicated to HotSpoting?
My thoughts are this:
1) Is there anything for this phone like a SafeStrap where you can change roms just by rebooting?
2) Could a rom be written to disable pretty much everything except hotspot (cannot receive text messages or phone calls, no apks are trying to use the internet in the background, etc...)?
I don't know how to make roms, so I am not going to say it sounds easy, but it does sound much simpler than a lot of the full OS roms I see.
Thanks guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah but there's already ROMs that have the ability to do Wifi hotspot. so why wouldnt you just flash one of those and call it a day.
not like you're really going to see any better battery life by only having it as a hotspot. that **** kills the battery
steveo17 said:
yeah but there's already ROMs that have the ability to do Wifi hotspot. so why wouldnt you just flash one of those and call it a day.
not like you're really going to see any better battery life by only having it as a hotspot. that **** kills the battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My phone already does hotspot. I just changed permissions and have been good to go.
I can't get internet out at my house, so I use my phone's hotspot (and an antenna and amplifier I put together) so I can still game. When I get a phone call, or a picture message, it will lag like crazy, or dump my game.
This is why I would like a very simple ROM that would not allow for anything but a hotspot, or even just the ability to turn everything else off. I also noticed that if I can keep my unused RAM above 1gb, it hotspot's better.
neondunker said:
I mean, there're 3G router for 30 dollars that can do that, and you want to use a fully featured phone that costs 150 USD$ o more for that?
Mmmmm.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have looked into 3G routers, but then I'd have to pay for another phone line, and I'm not looking to do that. Then there's companies that sell internet service that is unlimited and 3G, but they are about a $500 start up fee, and about $125 a month after that. That is CRAZY!
Unless I've got it wrong, and I can somehow clone my SIM Card for the 3G router? I'm definitely no 3G router expert. Thoughts?
In that case, you can install Android Firewall and block everything except tethering and there's an app for blocking all calls. I think (my opinion) that's easier than a full hotspot rom having to switch back and forth. You can also make an script for enabling both or use tasker.
neondunker said:
In that case, you can install Android Firewall and block everything except tethering and there's an app for blocking all calls. I think (my opinion) that's easier than a full hotspot rom having to switch back and forth. You can also make an script for enabling both or use tasker.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I'm going to look into that right now.
This app:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jtschohl.androidfirewall
Does what you need.
neondunker said:
This app:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jtschohl.androidfirewall
Does what you need.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, that's what I got. Also I got another apk that blocks startup apks (BootManager), and with both of them I got better signal.
Thanks for the help.
I have also noticed that my battery life has increased a lot. I was 40% more efficient since doing this yesterday, and about 40% more efficient this morning too. I'm assuming it's because of the BootManager.
Does anyone know the programs to allow through the firewall in order to get the hotspot to work?
I tried allowing everything (by clicking the check boxes) and that didn't work unless I clicked the box that says 'all apps'. I'm assuming what I need is not populating and so the only was to get it is to click 'all apps' which defeats the purpose. :-/
And does anyone know if the hotspot is a stand alone or if it uses other applications in order to work?
Thanks again!
If you go to settings, there's an option "Tethering support". You have to enable that in order to tether to works.
Just a thing: If you modify your traffic or DNS or whatever with another program (example, AdFree that blocks ads) the adds will be blocked also to anyone that connects to the hotspot.
neondunker said:
If you go to settings, there's an option "Tethering support". You have to enable that in order to tether to works.
Just a thing: If you modify your traffic or DNS or whatever with another program (example, AdFree that blocks ads) the adds will be blocked also to anyone that connects to the hotspot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't find a 'settings' on it or a 'Tethering Support'. I only see when hitting menu: Firewall Disabled/Enabled, Log Disabled/Enabled, Save Rules, Exit, Help, and More.
Then under 'More', I see: Show Log, Show Rules, Clear Log, Set Password, Set Custom Script.
There is also the Mode in the top left that lets me do White/Black list.
I would love to go into 'Tethering Support if you can guide me there!
I don't know if we are seeing the same app but this one has that option
Enviado desde mi MB886 mediante Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 07:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:45 PM ----------
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Enviado desde mi MB886 mediante Tapatalk
What is the apk and version number you're running? That link is dead. I downloaded 'droid wall v1.5.7'.
CorneliusRox said:
What is the apk and version number you're running? That link is dead. I downloaded 'droid wall v1.5.7'.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Droidwall hasn't been updated in ages and doesn't have toggles for tethering.
I use AFWall+, which built off the concept of Droidwall. It has an entry you can whitelist for Tether & DNS.
xtermmin said:
Droidwall hasn't been updated in ages and doesn't have toggles for tethering.
I use AFWall+, which built off the concept of Droidwall. It has an entry you can whitelist for Tether & DNS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahhh. Yeah, this program looks much much better. I'm out for work all week, but when I get back home this weekend, I'll give it a try.
Thanks for the help!
EDIT: I don't have tethering in the options like you, but it's just another application on the list so I checked it. Is there anything else I need to check to make it only hotspot? Like the phone and text one, or the DLNA?

Adblocker [No root]

Hello! My moto g3 isn't actually rooted, but I want to remove ads, which app would you suggest? I know adblock plus and adguard, which is the best?
Firefox with uBlock Origin is smoother and faster than AdBlock Plus. Firefox can be download from the Play Store, and uBlock Origin from within Firefox's Add-ons settings.
AdBlock Plus also has their own browser in the Play Store.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.adblockplus.browser
There's also a dev created Chrome version with an AdBlock in it called NoChromo.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/apps-games/app-nochromo-wild-browser-appears-t3130776
bobbyphoenix said:
Firefox with uBlock Origin is smoother and faster than AdBlock Plus. Firefox can be download from the Play Store, and uBlock Origin from within Firefox's Add-ons settings.
AdBlock Plus also has their own browser in the Play Store.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.adblockplus.browser
There's also a dev created Chrome version with an AdBlock in it called NoChromo.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/apps-games/app-nochromo-wild-browser-appears-t3130776
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bobby, but i will use the adblock plus app, not the browser extension. How about adguard and battery drain?
Inviato dal mio MotoG3 utilizzando Tapatalk
I haven't tried AdGuard for a long time. Back with they had to do a bunch of stuff just to get it going. I see now it's improved in a lot of ways. I'm going to give it a try. I'll report back later.
OK. I've been using my phone the same way as normal for the past four hours, and I must say Adguard is the way to go. With screen on time at 3 and a half hours Adguard is showing it's been used for ten minutes. I see no extra use on battery, and web browsing has been faster. I'm using Chrome, and its so nice not having ads. I enabled it to block ads in apps too, but I don't really use many apps that have ads. I use paid versions, but it's nice to seeds it can do that too without root. Overall I'm impressed, and even bought the lifetime license. Thanks for starting this thread. Otherwise I would not have tried it again. Super easy to set up, and once it's running there is no maintenance as it's all automatic.
i use adgaurd it stops adds very good.
apps like way2sms, speedtest by ookla and somany apps try to load ads,but if i keep adgaurd ON,they cant load any adds
i havent tried adblockplus .. so i cant say about it :|
I use adaway religiously, I think they all generally do the same thing as they just alter your phones hosts file.
Sent from my MotoG3
christopherrrg said:
I use adaway religiously, I think they all generally do the same thing as they just alter your phones hosts file.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they don't. Since altering the host file requires a rooted phone.
Non-root adblockers work via a proxy/vpn connection that filters adds.
alienhead13 said:
No they don't. Since altering the host file requires a rooted phone.
Non-root adblockers work via a proxy/vpn connection that filters adds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool bro, thanks.
Sent from my MotoG3
christopherrrg said:
I use adaway religiously, I think they all generally do the same thing as they just alter your phones hosts file.
Sent from my MotoG3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used adaway in the past, but I don't actually have a rooted phone
Francesco27 said:
I used adaway in the past, but I don't actually have a rooted phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah AdAway now requires root. I use it on my CM 12.1 phone. Adguard doesn't require root, and does the same thing. I use both, and see no difference in performance. Both great apps. When I used a stock phone before I would root just for AdAway, but now with Adguard, I don't have to root, so I keep all stock, and am able to get OTAs too. That was the main downfall of rooting for me. I only wanted to block ads, so I rooted, but lost the ability of OTAs. Now I have the best of both worlds.
bobbyphoenix said:
Yeah AdAway now requires root. I use it on my CM 12.1 phone. Adguard doesn't require root, and does the same thing. I use both, and see no difference in performance. Both great apps. When I used a stock phone before I would root just for AdAway, but now with Adguard, I don't have to root, so I keep all stock, and am able to get OTAs too. That was the main downfall of rooting for me. I only wanted to block ads, so I rooted, but lost the ability of OTAs. Now I have the best of both worlds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to root my device for several reasons. I also usually flash a custom ROM, but I had a big issue with Motorola warranty for my previous Moto G Lte, so I decided to don't unlock again the bootloader and wait for Android M
About Adgaurd
i am using adgaurd
and yes , my ads will be blocked with VPN made by the adgaurd , but i am sure this wont effect your internet speeds
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
NOTE: i dont allways keep this adgaurd enabled, if it needs to be working whole time it surely wants to consume power, so i enable it when i surf internet with chrome..
but mozilla's adblockplus does a decent job too when it comes to browsing only in a web-browser (firefox)
nandakis4 said:
i am using adgaurd
and yes , my ads will be blocked with VPN made by the adgaurd , but i am sure this wont effect your internet speeds
View attachment 3496085 View attachment 3496086
NOTE: i dont allways keep this adgaurd enabled, if it needs to be working whole time it surely wants to consume power, so i enable it when i surf internet with chrome..
but mozilla's adblockplus does a decent job too when it comes to browsing only in a web-browser (firefox)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It uses very little battery if enable full time. I've had it on since I installed the app, and it maybe uses a bit more battery. If before I could get 6 and a half hours SOT, and the battery was at 10%, now I get 6 hours and 25 min of SOT at 10%. Not a huge change, and if I check battery stats at 10% left Adguard is towards the bottom at like 3% use.
bobbyphoenix said:
It uses very little battery if enable full time. I've had it on since I installed the app, and it maybe uses a bit more battery. If before I could get 6 and a half hours SOT, and the battery was at 10%, now I get 6 hours and 25 min of SOT at 10%. Not a huge change, and if I check battery stats at 10% left Adguard is towards the bottom at like 3% use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for notifying about charging i was worried its consuming charging,as it had to run altime
Hello, I am using adguard and it is amazing! I read on their blog how to get a free key (http://adguard.com/en/get-adguard-for-free.html). So 4 my friends installed adguard from my link, but I still have 0 installations
So i installed adguard on my tablet from my link and the counter is still at 0. Can someone help me?
My link is http://adguard.com/?c=819190

[CLOSED][APP][5.1+] VPN/Sentry - Virtual private network with firewall [DISCONTINUED]

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
VPN/Sentry
Virtual private network with firewall
Encrypt the internet traffic of all your apps
Allow or block internet traffic per app or address
Mix your internet traffic with that of others for increased privacy
Simple to use while still offering advanced features
Blocking access to the internet can help to:
reduce data usage
save on battery usage
increase your privacy
VPN/Sentry is designed for minimum battery usage and maximum network speed. It does not require root permissions.
VPN/Sentry supports all IP protocols. You'll even have IPv6 connectivity when you normally don't have.
There is a free data allowance of 50 MB per day to try the app. Unlimited data usage is available with a subscription.
This app is in beta testing stage, but seems to be pretty stable so far.
Download:
https://play.google.com/apps/testing/eu.faircode.vpnsentry
Website:
https://www.vpnsentry.net/
Terms of service (draft):
https://www.vpnsentry.net/tos/
Privacy policy (draft):
https://www.vpnsentry.net/privacy/
Frequently asked questions:
https://www.vpnsentry.net/faq/
Hi What's the difference with NetGuard?
Inviato dal mio ASUS_Z00LD utilizzando Tapatalk
steakhutzeee said:
Hi What's the difference with NetGuard?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was prepared for this question
See here: https://www.vpnsentry.net/faq/#FAQ16
Hi Marcel,
VPN/Sentry does not auto-start on reboot. Is this by design?
device: Nexus 6P/Oreo
- set VPN/Sentry as Alway-on VPN
- Upon reboot, VPN/Sentry is not auto connected.
- has to touch the VPN/Sentry icon in the Status bar to manually connect.
hiaig said:
Hi Marcel,
VPN/Sentry does not auto-start on reboot. Is this by design?
device: Nexus 6P/Oreo
- set VPN/Sentry as Alway-on VPN
- Upon reboot, VPN/Sentry is not auto connected.
- has to touch the VPN/Sentry icon in the Status bar to manually connect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Start on boot works properly, but I can reproduce your problem if I set VPN/Sentry as always on VPN like you did. I will look into this tomorrow.
Thanks for reporting this.
Edit: correction: if I wait long enough, it works. Android starts VPN/Sentry soon after boot, but it takes some time until Android reports "boot completed" to VPN/Sentry.
Can you please check what happens if you wait a little longer?
M66B said:
Start on boot works properly, but I can reproduce your problem if I set VPN/Sentry as always on VPN like you did. I will look into this tomorrow.
Thanks for reporting this.
Edit: correction: if I wait long enough, it works. Android starts VPN/Sentry soon after boot, but it takes some time until Android reports "boot completed" to VPN/Sentry.
Can you please check what happens if you wait a little longer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you are correct. If I wait long enough, VPN/Sentry will auto connect.
Thanks
hiaig said:
Yes, you are correct. If I wait long enough, VPN/Sentry will auto connect.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just released beta version 0.18 which will start the VPN earlier when VPN/Sentry has been set to always-on VPN.
It may take a few hours until this release is available in the Play store.
Edit: the release type has been changed from alpha to beta, since recent releases seems to be pretty stable.
Will speed be impaired?
Sent from my SM-J730GM using Tapatalk
sulasno said:
Will speed be impaired?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
VPN/Sentry was designed for minimal battery usage and maximum speed. The server bandwidth, currently 100 Mbit/sec, is shared though. See the terms of service (menu, help, about) for more information.
This looks like a great app! I do wish you would reconsider your position on releasing the source code, both for the Android VPN client and the server. If I could, I would love to run my own, private server instance, even if this means sacrificing some anonymity. I also have to imagine that if this app takes off (which I hope it does), server bandwidth costs would become prohibitively expensive for you to maintain yourself, which means you will start having to charge users for bandwidth. I also think it doesn't make sense to always route everything through France when the majority of the time I'm at home, on my own local WiFi network.
Cannot run alongside with Blokada*
Sent from my SM-J730GM using Tapatalk
hackel said:
This looks like a great app! I do wish you would reconsider your position on releasing the source code, both for the Android VPN client and the server. If I could, I would love to run my own, private server instance, even if this means sacrificing some anonymity. I also have to imagine that if this app takes off (which I hope it does), server bandwidth costs would become prohibitively expensive for you to maintain yourself, which means you will start having to charge users for bandwidth. I also think it doesn't make sense to always route everything through France when the majority of the time I'm at home, on my own local WiFi network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no plans to open source VPN/Sentry at this moment. One of the reasons is that I don't want to support running own serves, since this will inevitably result in all kind of questions I don't want / can't put time into at this moment.
Related FAQ: https://www.vpnsentry.net/faq/#FAQ8
This thread is for a reason in the XDA paid apps main forum. Data usage is free at this moment and will stay free up to a limit (to be determined), but will / need to be paid later on.
If you would run your own server, your internet traffic has to pass through your local Wi-Fi network as well, so this is not really an argument. I will add a server in Canada soon, also to have a proper backup, if you are worried about latency.
If you are concerned about your privacy, this is what I wrote in the NetGuard forum:
"I can imagine people asking themselves if I am trustworthy and they should. Therefore a little about my motives: developing VPN/Sentry is mainly a technical challenge to me (although the app looks simple, it is in fact a lot more complex than NetGuard under the hood). VPN/Sentry is something I want to use myself to reduce battery usage while still having full filtering capabilities. VPN/Sentry already has profiles and will have wildcard and global filtering (including ad blocking) in the near future.
I am just a independent developer and not a big company. IMHO you should be more worried about big companies anyway. Run the Android Booking.com app with NetGuard with filtering enabled or with VPN/Sentry enabled and take a look at what is being accessed for an example.
I have no interest in your data and not even the time to analyze your data. I might take a look at your data in the testing phase, but this will be just to debug problems.
Anyway, you have to make up your own mind about this, but I hope this helps."
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=73943716&postcount=5493
sulasno said:
Cannot run alongside with Blokada*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only one app can use the Android VPN service at the same time, so this is not surprising.
VPN/Sentry will have it's own ad blocker in the near future.
The server data (rules/conditions) will be backed up daily from now.
Possible to trigger VPN with apps without using 3rd party tools?
Sent from my SM-J730GM using Tapatalk
sulasno said:
Possible to trigger VPN with apps without using 3rd party tools?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not sure what you mean, so can you explain in more detail what you want?
What do you mean by "trigger" ?
Turn on VPN when I use Facebook. Off when I shut down FB
Sent from my Samsung SM-J730GM using XDA Labs
sulasno said:
Turn on VPN when I use Facebook. Off when I shut down FB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without root permissions it is not possible to monitor the state (active or not) of other apps, so what you want is not possible. Note that VPN/Sentry was designed to not require root permissions.
I don't see the added value either, since the VPN is there to secure all connections, not only those of Facebook. If you really want, you can enable the VPN and exclude all apps except Facebook from using the VPN.
I'm very excited to see you working on another privacy app, thankyou M. - I will be happy to assist by testing as far as my time allows.
Is there any public repository of issues where to check before asking stupid questions or reporting duplicate 'bugs' ?
At my first trials, I noticed odd app behaviour regarding defaults of blocking/permitting. Are you aware of any issues in that area?
Gerolianis said:
I'm very excited to see you working on another privacy app, thankyou M. - I will be happy to assist by testing as far as my time allows.
Is there any public repository of issues where to check before asking stupid questions or reporting duplicate 'bugs' ?
At my first trials, I noticed odd app behaviour regarding defaults of blocking/permitting. Are you aware of any issues in that area?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for helping.
Just comment here if you have any question or remark. Everything is still deliberately low profile.
What odd app behavior did you notice?

Question 9 hours SOT on Exynos since the March update...

Spoiler: Screen shot
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
westeight said:
Spoiler: Screen shot
View attachment 5250955
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need a girlfriend ASAP
I was actually hoping you might ask your boyfriend if his sister is single...
Looks like you're making a killing off BTC highs.
westeight said:
I was actually hoping you might ask your boyfriend if his sister is single...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interestingly, google's own browser - chrome drains more battery than edge! Time to change
amirage said:
Interestingly, google's own browser - chrome drains more battery than edge! Time to change
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Samsung Browser. It's the best in my opinion.
iamnotkurtcobain said:
Try Samsung Browser. It's the best in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd try it but it's just too inconvenient...I can't transfer my passwords, my bookmarks, sync my history across devices etc etc...Edge at least has the option to import from Chrome and the Microsoft authenticator imports passwords from Chrome...this way I don't miss out on the auto-fill service. I'd always like to go stock but with so many inconveniences built into Samsung's stock apps, you have to look for alternatives...I was so looking forward to using Samsung pass but since there's no option to import from google passwords, I dropped it...
amirage said:
I'd try it but it's just too inconvenient...I can't transfer my passwords, my bookmarks, sync my history across devices etc etc...Edge at least has the option to import from Chrome and the Microsoft authenticator imports passwords from Chrome...this way I don't miss out on the auto-fill service. I'd always like to go stock but with so many inconveniences built into Samsung's stock apps, you have to look for alternatives...I was so looking forward to using Samsung pass but since there's no option to import from google passwords, I dropped it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use bitwarden for passwords as it works across all platforms and generates safer passwords (my PlayStation account got hacked a few months back), you can use it to replace Samsung pass and import passwords from most browsers - I would recommend looking at it
mtm1401 said:
I use bitwarden for passwords as it works across all platforms and generates safer passwords (my PlayStation account got hacked a few months back), you can use it to replace Samsung pass and import passwords from most browsers - I would recommend looking at it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bitwarden...hhmmmm...let me research.
iamnotkurtcobain said:
Try Samsung Browser. It's the best in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In what way is Samsung's browser the "best"? I'd like to know this before I take the leap of faith and ditch chrome/ edge/ firefox...
westeight said:
Spoiler: Screen shot
View attachment 5250955
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how much sot were you getting before update
mtm1401 said:
I use bitwarden for passwords as it works across all platforms and generates safer passwords (my PlayStation account got hacked a few months back), you can use it to replace Samsung pass and import passwords from most browsers - I would recommend looking at it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been checking out Bitwarden but somehow the app doesn't work well with Samsung internet..I have tried all known settings...Is it working seamlessly for you? If so, how?
amirage said:
I have been checking out Bitwarden but somehow the app doesn't work well with Samsung internet..I have tried all known settings...Is it working seamlessly for you? If so, how?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is it not working? I occasionally have to search for a password in the app, but once I fill and save it usually auto populates.
Yes, I tried to but the app doesn't auto populate in Samsung's internet..Is there any specific setting in Bitwarden?
Today's battery life.
I always have my doubts on these SoT, 9 hours of on time doing what and on what settings?
I don't think my battery is that bad, exynos wqhd and adaptive refresh rate I reckon lowering to 60fps could eek out another hour or so
I used to get around 7 hours prior to the march update, getting 9+ now. And that's with ONLY the standard Adaptive Battery setting enabled. I've disabled "Put apps to sleep" setting and all that junk. No other battery or power saving measures enabled.
WQHD + Adaptive refresh rate. BT, NFCand wi-fi always on. Mobile network on 4G auto.
amirage said:
In what way is Samsung's browser the "best"? I'd like to know this before I take the leap of faith and ditch chrome/ edge/ firefox...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better performance, lighter on resources, the best dark mode on any mobile browser, extensions for ad blocking, built in tracking and privacy protections.

Categories

Resources