Database Develop

Lightroom hdr cam trums gcam!

Just tried out the built in cam in lightroom for diffrent scenarios. It really bests both the built in cam and the gcam for both normal and hdr scenarios. Try adobe lightrooms cam out with HDR enabled. Skip the gcam hype.

favvomannen said:
Just tried out the built in cam in lightroom for diffrent scenarios. It really bests both the built in cam and the gcam for both normal and hdr scenarios. Try it out. Skip the gcam hype.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samples or examples please

https://s.amsu.ng/zuCGxIISsxVN
Just one example zoomed in. This was at night. Much more dnr dynamic range with lightroom cam.
Even more pronounced in daylight though. But test it for yourelf. The image file is 40mb un edited. Any serious photographer on any phone should use the lightroom cam from now on.

favvomannen said:
https://s.amsu.ng/zuCGxIISsxVN
Just one example zoomed in. This was at night. Much more dnr dynamic range with lightroom cam.
Even more pronounced in daylight though. But test it for yourelf. The image file is 40mb un edited. Any serious photographer on any phone should use the lightroom cam from now on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some proof lightroom camera totally BLOWS google camera away
https://s.amsu.ng/0NNCM4jQVwxN
https://s.amsu.ng/zo7Lsb2sTsIN
These are max zoom ins. And not even in any hard hdr scenario. In a scenario where hdr is needed the lightroom camera is even more overpowered.

Looks impressive. Cheers.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

App link?

Just go into playstore and search for and download
"Adobe lightroom".
Now there would be nice to compair the pixel2 and the note8 with both cams using lightroom hdr camera to really se what phone takes the best pics.

favvomannen said:
Just go into playstore and search for and download
"Adobe lightroom".
Now there would be nice to compair the pixel2 and the note8 with both cams using lightroom hdr camera to really se what phone takes the best pics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you compared it against Open camera? With settings all the way up.

Nick216ohio said:
Have you compared it against Open camera? With settings all the way up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Does it require root? Wher can one get it? Id like to compaire it.
- i just tried it! Amazing! BUT SLOW. alot slower than lightroom. Tomorrow i will compair it with lightroom for quality. Sad the final hdr picture from open camera isnt in RAW format. I will post back on details of quality in 24 hrs.

favvomannen said:
No. Does it require root? Wher can one get it? Id like to compaire it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search Open Camera on play store. It has a blue icon.

favvomannen said:
No. Does it require root? Wher can one get it? Id like to compaire it.
- i just tried it! Amazing! BUT SLOW. alot slower than lightroom. Tomorrow i will compair it with lightroom for quality. Sad the final hdr picture from open camera isnt in RAW format. I will post back on details of quality in 24 hrs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Open camera has raw format.

Nick216ohio said:
Open camera has raw format.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but no raw format for the hdr image using hdr function. Lightroom does hdr out of raw files whereas im thinking lr cam is better. But ofc we need to test.

I just tested lowlight.
1. Lightroom preserves more detail and more dnr
2. Opencamera hdr is more compressed ie less detail but less noise. (You could still do manual nrd on lr)
3. No majour differences but a minor plus for the LR cam. LR cam is also quicker.
summary. Lightroom is best. Its quick and gives a bit better quality due to rawfiles in its hdr compaired to opencamera.

Example. Lr on the right. Quite alot more detail zoomed in very much. Opencamera gets very muddy and there is no way you can see each tile on the house.
https://s.amsu.ng/HgzXRdgG8YwN

Hello,
I want to use the ported version of the Gcam on my Galaxy J5(2017) with Android 7.0 and Exynos 7870 Octa. Can someone help me with an Android 7.0 version of this port?
Thank you.

muzsielod said:
Hello,
I want to use the ported version of the Gcam on my Galaxy J5(2017) with Android 7.0 and Exynos 7870 Octa. Can someone help me with an Android 7.0 version of this port?
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your clearly asking in the wrong thread... use the search button, there are threads about this in the apps and themes forum... it mi9ght be the best place to start...

favvomannen said:
Just tried out the built in cam in lightroom for diffrent scenarios. It really bests both the built in cam and the gcam for both normal and hdr scenarios. Try adobe lightrooms cam out with HDR enabled. Skip the gcam hype.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about the portrait mode in Lightroom, most of the people use GCam only for its exceptional portrait mode option!

Over sharpening of photo

It look like over sharpening of photo in strong sunlight. Anyone else feel the same?

Yes. In every situation the sharpening is excessive and ruins many photos. The only way to get rid of it is to shoot in 40mp mode but then you can't zoom

You can reduce sharpening in editing after the fact on pretty much any decent editor. Snapseed mobile, Lightroom or photoshop on PC.
It very rarely damages photos. The outcry is a little over the top.
In bright sunshine 40mp is probably the best way to shoot anyway.

Jonathan-H said:
You can reduce sharpening in editing after the fact on pretty much any decent editor. Snapseed mobile, Lightroom or photoshop on PC.
It very rarely damages photos. The outcry is a little over the top.
In bright sunshine 40mp is probably the best way to shoot anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The whole point of sharpening in P20 Pro is that it simply destroys data. There is no way to get it back in software, it just isn't there. This is a huge problem

I am considering to go back to my S9+ as P20 pro is far too much over sharpening.
I hope they will do something to the camera software before I make the change

dont expect anything like it from huawei, use another camera app

possible solution?
I find that using a zoom of 2.9x with 10mb auto mode helps with avoidance of over sharpening. With the same scene, the 2.9x zoom looks more natural when viewing at 100% pixel level:
At 2.9x zoom
https:// ibb.co/ bQtRBT
At 3.0x zoom
https:// ibb.co/ niGk5o
What do you think?
Hmm, having trouble with links not showing up... Please delete the spaces

photoxd said:
I find that using a zoom of 2.9x with 10mb auto mode helps with avoidance of over sharpening. With the same scene, the 2.9x zoom looks more natural when viewing at 100% pixel level:
At 2.9x zoom
https:// ibb.co/ bQtRBT
At 3.0x zoom
https:// ibb.co/ niGk5o
What do you think?
Hmm, having trouble with links not showing up... Please delete the spaces
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find it works even better at 3x zoom if you use the lowest resolution.

Halfspark said:
I find it works even better at 3x zoom if you use the lowest resolution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I checked the setting, there are other resolution options at 7MB, but they are of different dimensions (ie. 1:1 and 3:2), so they are really more of a crop of the same resolution rather than a different resolution.

I had the same problems with the Mate 10 Pro. The image processing was so bad that I finally decided to sell it and buy something else. I could not stand the poor quality of the pictures. Oil paint effect, lack of details even at 10-20% crop. Not acceptable for such an expensive device. I remember the P9 having NONE of these problems.

I have this problem and I figured out the fixes. Huawei users have two options to take photos where the auto sharpening ruins your photos. 1) shoot pro mode at max resolution. or 2) Shoot in aperture mode.

Custom Full Screen Gesture Control [Fluid Gesture]

♦ Fluid Gesture app download : Official or Mod
♦ Lean how to do fully working : Article or MOD EDIT: LINK REMOVED

soliman.sohan said:
best stable google cam for mi a3 & everything is working fine.. just download & install. you are ready to use:
http://bit.ly/2ltQs4M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about ultrawide

Rajendran Rasa said:
What about ultrawide
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ultrawide doesn't support in gcam on mi a3

Tried it working great. Thanks!

soliman.sohan said:
ultrawide doesn't support in gcam on mi a3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you be able to share DNG raw photos from the Gcam app?
Thanks

helder.vice said:
Would you be able to share DNG raw photos from the Gcam app?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RAW pic of back camera
https://gofile.io/?c=FZPSxE

soliman.sohan said:
RAW pic of back camera
https://gofile.io/?c=FZPSxE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The DNG raw file has some good detail for a phone.
The photo was shot at ISO 89 so it's expected to have very low noise.
This is the jpg file developed with Capture One Pro: https://gofile.io/?c=l4IuRB
Good detail even at 100% zoom, quite good for a phone.
Would you be able to share more DNG raw files, this time shot at higher ISO levels so we can get a good idea of the sensor performance and noise at lower light levels ?
Thanks :good:

helder.vice said:
The DNG raw file has some good detail for a phone.
The photo was shot at ISO 89 so it's expected to have very low noise.
This is the jpg file developed with Capture One Pro: https://gofile.io/?c=l4IuRB
Good detail even at 100% zoom, quite good for a phone.
Would you be able to share more DNG raw files, this time shot at higher ISO levels so we can get a good idea of the sensor performance and noise at lower light levels ?
Thanks :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same place at night time RAW
https://gofile.io/?c=koVhdy

soliman.sohan said:
same place at night time RAW
https://gofile.io/?c=koVhdy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the DNG samples.
The file size is quite small for DNG raw, only around 10 Mb.
The Mi9 DNG raw files are over 22Mb.
Maybe with a different Gcam app the DNG files will have more data?

helder.vice said:
Thank you for the DNG samples.
The file size is quite small for DNG raw, only around 10 Mb.
The Mi9 DNG raw files are over 22Mb.
Maybe with a different Gcam app the DNG files will have more data?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gcam & aslo processor effects on camera data

What is better? This gcam or this ? What of them take the better photos? I think this version, above all for the photos taken with nightsight mode!
And.... are there hopes to have a gcam with working ultra wide camera without root ?

P30 Pro photo file sizes?

What kind of file sizes are you folks seeing with this camera in the different megapixel modes? Thinking about picking one up but wondering how much compression there is. Currently on a 6t which is terrible.
Thanks
Bill
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app

bill3508 said:
What kind of file sizes are you folks seeing with this camera in the different megapixel modes? Thinking about picking one up but wondering how much compression there is. Currently on a 6t which is terrible.
Thanks
Bill
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better shoot raw if you want full control, 10MP is enough for social medias and 6x4 inc print. Otherwise, shoot at 40MP

IamNumber25 said:
Better shoot raw if you want full control, 10MP is enough for social medias and 6x4 inc print. Otherwise, shoot at 40MP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah im just wondering what size the pics come out as in stock form in 40 and 10 mp?
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app

bill3508 said:
Yeah im just wondering what size the pics come out as in stock form in 40 and 10 mp?
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on the complexity of the scene, I have seen the 10MP range from under 1MB > over 8MB on my standard P30
Just shot 10MP vs 40MP in the house to test, 10MP was 1.76MB and 40MP was 5.19MB

*Detection* said:
Depends on the complexity of the scene, I have seen the 10MP range from under 1MB > over 8MB on my standard P30
Just shot 10MP vs 40MP in the house to test, 10MP was 1.76MB and 40MP was 5.19MB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats not what I was hoping for.
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app

bill3508 said:
Thats not what I was hoping for.
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What were you hoping for?

P30Pro compared to P20Pro
I've just upgraded from the P20Pro to the P30Pro and at the same settings the P30Pro is giving me images with less than half the file size of the earlier model. I'm really surprised by this...is there more compression being added, or do you think that the camera might be faulty? Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this.

retiredjohn said:
I've just upgraded from the P20Pro to the P30Pro and at the same settings the P30Pro is giving me images with less than half the file size of the earlier model. I'm really surprised by this...is there more compression being added, or do you think that the camera might be faulty? Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's way too much compression.
Try zooming in on a photo that wasn't taken as a raw shot. It's horrendous!

fards said:
There's way too much compression.
Try zooming in on a photo that wasn't taken as a raw shot. It's horrendous!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want better jpeg IQ, shoot in RAW in Pro mode and you'll get jpegs directly from the RAW file, bypassing all the over-processing that you get in auto mode, this is the only reason I am so committed to Huawei, they are the only OEM that does this, all other brands just process the jpeg as per normal auto mode when you shoot in Pro mode with RAW.
With Huawei the jpeg you get from Pro mode with RAW enabled comes directly from the RAW file and is way more natural etc. see crop below, top crop is from auto mode, bottom crop is from the jpeg from RAW in Pro mode, massive difference.

Jostian said:
If you want better jpeg IQ, shoot in RAW in Pro mode and you'll get jpegs directly from the RAW file, bypassing all the over-processing that you get in auto mode, this is the only reason I am so committed to Huawei, they are the only OEM that does this, all other brands just process the jpeg as per normal auto mode when you shoot in Pro mode with RAW.
With Huawei the jpeg you get from Pro mode with RAW enabled comes directly from the RAW file and is way more natural etc. see crop below, top crop is from auto mode, bottom crop is from the jpeg from RAW in Pro mode, massive difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't say I agree with any of that.
RAW from my P30 pro is vastly inferior to the Raw shots from my Poco F1 and my old OP5 .
Jpegs in pro mode are no different in size or structure to those taken in Auto. They both have the same libjpeg applied to them.
There's an excessive amount of compression applied and artificial noise reduction, post sharpening.
a 40mp shot should not be coming out at 6mb .
Raw come out under exposed in most situations and require excessive amounts of noise reduction in anything other than bright sunlight.
*IF* we get camera api2 then it might be more usable as it will allow a bit better fine control, but as it stands the entire lens matrix code appears to be broken.
And in case you were wondering, yes I do have a lot of experience of camera driver code, at both kernel and userspace level. Unfortunately with huawei closed approach I can't even see what they are doing for definite. I do know that this will be my last device from them though as I don't like the results of the camera or the closed off approach.

fards said:
Can't say I agree with any of that.
RAW from my P30 pro is vastly inferior to the Raw shots from my Poco F1 and my old OP5 .
Jpegs in pro mode are no different in size or structure to those taken in Auto. They both have the same libjpeg applied to them.
There's an excessive amount of compression applied and artificial noise reduction, post sharpening.
a 40mp shot should not be coming out at 6mb .
Raw come out under exposed in most situations and require excessive amounts of noise reduction in anything other than bright sunlight.
*IF* we get camera api2 then it might be more usable as it will allow a bit better fine control, but as it stands the entire lens matrix code appears to be broken.
And in case you were wondering, yes I do have a lot of experience of camera driver code, at both kernel and userspace level. Unfortunately with huawei closed approach I can't even see what they are doing for definite. I do know that this will be my last device from them though as I don't like the results of the camera or the closed off approach.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont you see the difference in the crops?? compression is similar yes but the processing is way different, and I'm not talking of the RAW files but the jpeg that comes directly from the RAW file, which is very different to the jpeg in auto mode. See another crop below taken now in my office, left side from jpeg (auto mode), right side jpeg (from RAW in Pro mode) there is a big difference in processing, the libjpeg does not get used in taking the jpeg directly from RAW.

My Samsung Note 9 RAWs are far worse, and my iPhone Xs are also nothing special, for me the Huawei's are no worse than anything out there the fact that I can get a jpeg from the RAW data and just tweak it (but have that natural unprocessed look) is by far more useful to me. If you want to process all your own RAWs then things may be slightly different, but I see no big differences in the RAW files across OEMs, but this ability of Huawei phones to give you a jpeg directly from the RAW file automatically is a big plus for me.

Have a look at amir's dng processor for better image manipulation from raw
https://t.me/appforks
Bear in mind he's constantly tweaking how it works so there's a lot of versions on there too play with.
There's no such thing as a jpeg direct from raw.
It will always be processed.
And no I don't see any difference when zoned between the Pro mode jpeg and the normal.

Would any of you guys buy a camera with a built-in phone then complain its no good because the phone wasn't up to your expectations?
If I was as consumed by top quality photography as you guys seem to be I'd buy a dedicated camera that had the specs I most wanted.
FWIW I'm more than pleased with the results of the photos that I take. And the phones not too bad either ?

rubiicon59 said:
Would any of you guys buy a camera with a built-in phone then complain its no good because the phone wasn't up to your expectations?
If I was as consumed by top quality photography as you guys seem to be I'd buy a dedicated camera that had the specs I most wanted.
FWIW I'm more than pleased with the results of the photos that I take. And the phones not too bad either ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How very lovely for you.
My daughter was over the moon with her toy camera for years. Everyone else realised it was about as effective as rubbing vaseline in your eyes them looking at a Jackson Pollock to try to replicate a Constable haywain.
When she ended up with a decent camera she realised just had bad the old one had been. She was quite miffed.
If you buy a phone that's supposedly one of the best available and sold as coming with one of the highest rated camera systems.
Then that camera system turns out to get worse after a software update, I think you're fairly entitled to be a wee tad disgruntled and should expect more.
Personally I don't want to carry another camera with me.
The phone is there and available for producing photos when I need them quickly and immediately.
It's why I brought it.
By your logic, if I want to know where I am I should buy a standalone GPS, f*@k knows how I'd carry a typewriter around all day if I ever need to type a message out!
Ooh best not forget the pigeon as well.
Nope all in one devices that do as they are advertised to do. That's the future- oh no hang on that's supposed to be now-
Ideally the software in the phone software shouldn't be preventing the hardware from producing decent results.
But this is.
I offered to swap my p30 Pro for my old Poco f1 that my son now uses. He declined after testing it by taking some photos, he likes his f1.
The phone is great, the camera software is appalling.

Lol

RAW is ok, but requires a lot of tweaking and filespace.
The major problem is that when I take pictures, getting a 40 megapixel jpeg file which has too much compressing losing all fine details and causing 'blocks', typical jpeg compression artefacts.

Question 64 MP RAW photo possible?

I am interested in this phone. I know it can take 64 MP JPGs with the stock camera app and also some GCam ports. But what about 64 MP RAW photos, can they be taken either in stock camera app or GCam? And if so, can anybody share some samples?

Lazerr said:
I am interested in this phone. I know it can take 64 MP JPGs with the stock camera app and also some GCam ports. But what about 64 MP RAW photos, can they be taken either in stock camera app or GCam? And if so, can anybody share some samples?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, stock does take these images.
I could take samples later.

Blumi511 said:
Yes, stock does take these images.
I could take samples later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please do, that would be much appreciated. Outdoors in daylight with some vegetation would be the most interesting, but anything will do.
I presume GCam then can only do JPGs, but not DNG in 64 MP?

Weather sucks atm so I did not go out and it is pretty dark in right now. If it is not getting better today, I'll try to take the pictures inside with a lot of light

Lazerr said:
Please do, that would be much appreciated. Outdoors in daylight with some vegetation would be the most interesting, but anything will do.
I presume GCam then can only do JPGs, but not DNG in 64 MP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There you go
Zenfone8.7z
Shared with Dropbox
www.dropbox.com

Blumi511 said:
There you go
Zenfone8.7z
Shared with Dropbox
www.dropbox.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot. I would say noise looks surprisingly good here. Huawei P40 Pro seems much noisier after you transform RYYB to RGGB, and that is with much larger individual pixels. And the ZF8 has OIS, so exposure longer than 1/50 s with lower ISO should still be possible for static scenes...

Yes, it was okay for handheld, although I thought it went up at above iso 400.
For a handheld camera it was very good and it looked very natural