This is the new Oppo Reno 2 Smartphone
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
[URL] Oppo Reno2 review - YouTube [/URL]
Product information
Pros:
The large 6.5-inch screen provides enough room for videos and games.
You can quickly and smoothly switch between different apps with the 8GB of RAM.
Use the telephoto lens with optical zoom to zoom in without any loss of quality.
Con:
You can't place both a memory card and a second SIM card in the phone simultaneously.
Product description
With the 4 cameras on the OPPO Reno2, you can take a beautiful photo in every situation. In addition to the 48-megapixel standard lens, the device also has a 13-megapixel telephoto lens. With the optical zoom on this camera, you can get objects up to 2 times closer without any quality loss. With the 8-megapixel wide-angle lens, you can photograph large buildings and vast landscapes. Moreover, thanks to the image stabilization, your videos are less jerky when you're moving yourself. You can watch your favorite movies and series on the large 6.5-inch Full HD screen. Save your files and apps on the 256GB storage memory. The 4000mAh will easily last a day on a single charge. Is the Reno2 empty? Then you can charge it at lightning speed with the included VOOC Flash Charge 3.0 charger. Credits for this information goes to https://www.coolblue.nl/en/product/840670/oppo-reno2-blue.html
Own experience: beautiful screen, very fast, easy to setup if you switch from another brand, lots of internal storage and very good cameras for a Midrange Device. Front camera, see image, slides out like a shark fin
Regards kuzibri
Related
i have a nexus one and i was curious to know how anti-banding 60hz and 50hz or even auto, affect my photos... thanks
try taking a picture of a tv or computer monitor
walie said:
try taking a picture of a tv or computer monitor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just throwing it out there that, if it's to compensate for refreshrates, it should probably be named "anti-flicker" and not anti-banding. If I see banding in reference to images, I generally associate it with the image not being properly blended and each separate shade being easily identifiable.
Does anyone have an old CRT monitor or tube TV they can try 'off' vs '50, 60, or auto' with? Submit the results, pics or it didn't happen. I don't know if this is the case
Banding is pattern of vertical line in photo. And banding is digital imaging artifact. And banding happens in some extreme or special exposure or conditions. To avoid these pattern you can use Anti-banding feature of camera.
Alright, necroing in...
My device is Yu Yureka CM12.1. But what I've noticed is that the Anti-banding option doesn't change anything when I take the picture of, say my led monitor. But changing the ISO setting does. If we set ISO manually to a higher value like 800, bands will make the image ugly. Even lesser ISO values have banding, but to a small degree. Setting an Auto ISO mode solves the issue. I don't know the technical reasons behind it.
Here's a photo of my led monitor with ISO set to 800:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And here's the same frame in Auto ISO:
Hello all,
I would like it if some people could share pictures from the front-camera, particularly in low-light (it does not have to be a selfie ). This is because I am worried about the performance of my front camera because even though it says it is ISO 320 in the EXIF, the quality looks to be smudgy and really soft (even though I turned off the soft skin and stabilizer setting in Manual mode).
I know that its only 2MP but still, the quality of it in low-light as compared to good light is really significant. So I would like to confirm if this is just me or also the others..
Btw, I have a Clear Screen Protector so I'm not sure if that might also be contributing..
Thanks!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
You are not incorrect. The front camera, even worse than the back one, suffers from noise, grain, oversharpening artifacts, blurring, and washed out colors.
jluster said:
You are not incorrect. The front camera, even worse than the back one, suffers from noise, grain, oversharpening artifacts, blurring, and washed out colors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, bummer. I wonder if its software again or if its just the nature of front facing cameras? Weird thing is front facing video seems to be alright..
Thanks man!
I noticed this on front facing camera, my gf has z1 I have s3 and mine wins hands down
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
This is not meant to be a scientific test, I have 10 minutes or so of spare time so I just thought I'd test this.
No HDR, no anti-shake (as in compositing multiple photos into 1), no nothing just simple click to shoot.
The champions are:
1. Samsung Galaxy S5 LTE-A G906L, with 16MP sensor
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2. HTC One X Endeavour, with 8MP sensor
3. Sony Alpha NEX-5 2011, with 16MP sensor
Honestly, I think the S5 looks worse than my ancient relic that is the HTC One X, which was actually tested last so the sky has gotten dimmer. Maybe because the pixels are just way too small. I really think 8MP is good enough for phones for all sharpness purposes.
And then once again, pixel count isn't everything. The 2011 pre-historic Sony camera still wins hands down, even though it has the same pixel count as the S5.
And here are the full views, not full resolutions though, don't think any site will host the full thing for me.
==============================================
But if you look at it the other way, since the sensors are so damn small and you can't make low light photos watchable anyway, why not just boost the pixels and make the daytime photos better, even just slightly?
Del
LOL at people who expect DSLR sensor ISO performance out of a ****ty camera phone sensor. There's a reason why some of those cameras cost $2,500 or more...
I mean, it is just a mobile phone camera so performance will never be as good as a real camera (DSLR), but the only gripe I have with the S5 is the absence of "Low Light" mode that the S4 had, which made it easier, or in other words, known that the setting was dark, therefore allowing the cameras software to adjust for it.
Hi Guys
Just found yesterday this gear for photography. Think its a great idea to enjoy our great S6 / S6 Edge camera . If somebody of you have photography as a hobby I think it will be interesting for you as well.
I have my two tripods for DSLR Photography of landscape image... but with this part I think it will be a great solution as well for the "Androphotography"
What do you think about this part ?
Shoulderpod S1
nice, i would love to see it in action.
Only problem i see, is if i know im taking big photos i take my SLR.
My phone is more of a - i have it everywhere take snaps thing.
So i would forget to take the grip with me!
i think HandlePod is a more fitting name since the inclusion of 'shoulder' implies some sort of stablisation like a shoulder rig would give.
for video, i have this (freebie) selfie stick i use as a handle grip...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
to use as a table top tripod, i have a phone holder i attach to an Arca swiss style QR plate like so...
or if i'm traveling with my tripod, like so...
but since i pretty much have a photo camera married to my body all the time, i'll mount it to the top should i ever want to take a photo with it as well as being able to use it as a larger live view and having full control over the camera like so...
but the shoulderpod s1 does combine most of these functions into one pretty portable piece.
I will order my shoulderpod S1 next days for sure
Hello,
I bought a pixel 5a device 1.5 months ago. Frankly I have to say Phone speed , image quality , sound quality , ram management , battery backup, display everything is super fine for me . But unfortunately my pixel 5a's camera have some major issues . I didn't find any solutions for these issues though I mailed google support team several time also report an issue through feedback apps but no luck. My issues are :
1. Whenever I'm going to take a photo in low might mode or room light there's some (maybe 3-4) bars appear in my camera screen which is called as camera shutter speed mark.
2. In 4k mode video recording I'm not able to record a video more than 1.20 -1.30 minutes . After 1.30 minutes it shows that my device is too hot close camera until device is cools off.
so I want to know is there anyone who also facing the same issues like me ? and what is the solutions for these issues?
Thank You .
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The overheating in 4k is a common issue from my understanding. My solution unfortunately was to switch video to 1080. It seemed to resolve that issue but needs to be fixed. I'm not a huge fan of 4k video, but know others have it. If a product offers a feature that feature shouldn't be crippled by hardware shortfalls.