I noticed after topjohnwu joined Google, Magisk development has been brought to a standstill.
Links:
Magisk GitHub
Relevant Tweet
Is it time that Magisk gets forked since he's working on the Android security team and Magisk == "conflict of interest"?
No.
It hasnt been officially announced dead but last time he tweeted that google wouldnt allow him to continue working on it.
So consider it half-dead i guess.
yujinloh said:
It hasnt been officially announced dead but last time he tweeted that google wouldnt allow him to continue working on it.
So consider it half-dead i guess.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read that somewhere too, well after posting this forum thread.
I think we need to fork Magisk and continue from there.
MOD ACTION:
Thread closed since another earlier thread on the same subject already exists: https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/all-hands-on-deck.4303129/
Please search before posting.
Related
hey,
I'm visiting xda forums quite a while now.
But haven't bothered to post yet.
So i got the idea of posting cm10 nigthlies including google apps and samsung market on a daily basis.
But i'm not allowed to post in the dev session nor post external links to the rom.
Is there anyone willing to post the rom for me?
mnm1992 said:
hey,
I'm visiting xda forums quite a while now.
But haven't bothered to post yet.
So i got the idea of posting cm10 nigthlies including google apps and samsung market on a daily basis.
But i'm not allowed to post in the dev session nor post external links to the rom.
Is there anyone willing to post the rom for me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The CM10 nightlies are not yet here, so you're thinking about building them from source and posting here right ?
Anyway, as far as i know, including Google Apps in custom roms violates the license, therefore is not allowed here.
I think the same goes for Samsung apps.
Btw. now that CM9 went stable, it's most likely that we'll see official CM10 nightlies very soon.
Akiainavas said:
The CM10 nightlies are not yet here, so you're thinking about building them from source and posting here right ?
Anyway, as far as i know, including Google Apps in custom roms violates the license, therefore is not allowed here.
I think the same goes for Samsung apps.
Btw. now that CM9 went stable, it's most likely that we'll see official CM10 nightlies very soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i was indeed talking aboput building them and posting them here.
Actually as i alreaddy builded it for my self it wil just be posting
As far as including g-apps and samsung market go other roms include them as well.
Legally there is no reason to differeniate between posting seperate zip files for g-apps and samung market and including them in a rom.
Both are ways to distribute them and both are alreaddy on the site.
But i guess i won't be posting my builds here if they are against the rulez.
I'm not sure about it, please refer to XDA rules. I remember CM Team having troubles with including Gaaps in CM7 builds.
I'm sure that your CM10 build will be very appreciated by users here, try posting them in General section until you get access to developer section.
Akiainavas said:
I'm not sure about it, please refer to XDA rules. I remember CM Team having troubles with including Gaaps in CM7 builds.
I'm sure that your CM10 build will be very appreciated by users here, try posting them in General section until you get access to developer section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The second problem is that i'm not allowed to post the links to the builds..
So i really need the man in the middle
You actually built a ROM for yourself ? If so, then hang around the Q&A section.Plenty of space for posting even for the most basic problem solving.For a guy like you, getting the requisite number of posts will not be difficult.
Note:I'm not suggesting he spam the threads.
warfareonly said:
You actually built a ROM for yourself ? If so, then hang around the Q&A section.Plenty of space for posting even for the most basic problem solving.For a guy like you, getting the requisite number of posts will not be difficult.
Note:I'm not suggesting he spam the threads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The nightlies are live in the general section now with some nice url tricks.
But the dev section would be far better and using urls without tricks would be nice aswell.
As far as the posting goes well I'm an impatient guy.
I am here looking out for any Lollipop 5.0 ROM builds, if anyone has been able to port for P1000 or any under dev projects can be summarized here. I guess this thread didnt exist till now. Let start this thread specific to any lollipop related projects/devs here.. and keep it updated.
Moderator can take over make contributions to this thread....
BTW, I found this on google, for lollipop rom for p1000 but havent tested it as it was asking for survey to complete. I am not sure if this is real.
anybody tested this? Although the blog writer mentions a comment taken from xda-developers forums. I couldnt find any such thread or posts...
http://www.**********.org/mp3-0/samsung-p1000-galaxy-tab-3370.html
I'm 101% sure it's not true and a clear bogus blog much better to wait on trusted forum (xda) :good: depend on dev if they can/they will continue the support :fingers-crossed:
*waiting*
i found this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...lollipop-5-t3018841/post58568293#post58568293
When will this be available for Android 6.0 ? I want to use one of the modules in order to use Android Pay and cannot since I am now running Marshmallow. I googled all afternoon and saw nothing but issues about Lollipop. Am I wasting my time trying to get this? I know nothing about this framework and am not a developer at all. So I need help with this from someone like Rovo89. Thank you.
1. There's no module that will make Android Pay work, yet. The only thing that works is uninstalling xposed and hiding root.
2. In this very forum, about 6 posts down when you made your thread, is another thread asking exactly the same thing. It might have been good to read that one instead of writing this one.
3. Both your thread and that other one are unnecessary, as Rovo89 already answered this question yesterday in the official Xposed announcement thread, with preliminary information a few weeks ago. You should always start by getting all the information from the official source.
What official?
Spott07 said:
1. There's no module that will make Android Pay work, yet. The only thing that works is uninstalling xposed and hiding root.
2. In this very forum, about 6 posts down when you made your thread, is another thread asking exactly the same thing. It might have been good to read that one instead of writing this one.
3. Both your thread and that other one are unnecessary, as Rovo89 already answered this question yesterday in the official Xposed announcement thread, with preliminary information a few weeks ago. You should always start by getting all the information from the official source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw no info about this just lollipop. And I looked. Again I'm not a developer just an enthusiastic programmer that does not develop Android things. Where did he answer this? This other post few down you mentioned? I'm trying my best to get the information since seems very few are on marshmallow now
Look at the official Xposed announcement thread, in the stickies, at the end of the last 2 posts.
There is a thread on Marshmallow already here,
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/version-marshmallow-t3215666
No need for more. :good:
Thread closed.
Darth
Forum Moderator
Deleted
Deleted
Some ss would be nice
Can you specifically describe the ORIGINAL development on this one?
Sarthak Narang said:
Can you specifically describe the ORIGINAL development on this one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't really get the meaning of the ORIGINAL, I think I must post in the wrong place
hi @YumeMichi
first of all i'd like to say that its good to see everyone trying to lift up the burden of compiling something for the community instead of just pushing the burden on shoulders of specific people only, but there are some points/rules that you should keep in mind:
>the ORIGINAL development section is a place that belongs to some work which is original (made by the op himself/herself), commits also should be original ie. you should have your name in place of author. not everything belongs to orignal dev section.
>you should give proper credits to the main devs in the op who actually worked on getting it up, like you forgot to give me credit for kernel and @martinusbe and his team for slim rom.
>only post tested/working builds on xda and if the build is UNOFFICIAL then you should never redirect bug reports to the community or official bug report section, so try to mention and keep them in the thread only.
>If the orignal Developer hasnt released his stuff on xda "yet" then there has to be a reason behind it and you shouldnt release it before him, always ask him first. you just included R21 (i guess) in your build which i havent released yet on xda.
keep these few things in mind, after all its a community and we are here to help each other to make the most out of our device.
EDIT: ask any mod for help, they'll help you out in moving the thread.
CheckYourScreen said:
hi @YumeMichi
first of all i'd like to say that its good to see everyone trying to lift up the burden of compiling something for the community instead of just pushing the burden on shoulders of specific people only, but there are some points/rules that you should keep in mind:
>the ORIGINAL development section is a place that belongs to some work which is original (made by the op himself/herself), commits also should be original ie. you should have your name in place of author. not everything belongs to orignal dev section.
>you should give proper credits to the main devs in the op who actually worked on getting it up, like you forgot to give me credit for kernel and @martinusbe and his team for slim rom.
>only post tested/working builds on xda and if the build is UNOFFICIAL then you should never redirect bug reports to the community or official bug report section, so try to mention and keep them in the thread only.
>If the orignal Developer hasnt released his stuff on xda "yet" then there has to be a reason behind it and you shouldnt release it before him, always ask him first. you just included R21 (i guess) in your build which i havent released yet on xda.
keep these few things in mind, after all its a community and we are here to help each other to make the most out of our device.
EDIT: ask any mod for help, they'll help you out in moving the thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you are right. I am sorry for my ill-conceived.
I'll contact to staff to remove this post.
I want to know about the development of xposed for
Android oreo is started or not. When rovo89 will announce it? Many xposed lovers are waiting. Does anyone know about it? I cant wait to use on oreo.
Oh boy here we go again.
@Mr.Droider,
There are already discussions and threads of people impatient and constantly asking about Oreo.
You starting another thread, trying to make the title look real-like, and then asking a bunch of ETAs. That's laugh out loud funny.
You say you can't wait but the thing is, you don't have a choice. Nothing else you can do unless you want to take up development yourself.
Did you not see this thread already...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3663491
Status for Xposed for Oreo 8.0??
Yours is an unnecessary thread. Hopefully it'll be removed.
ZTE Axon 7 A2017U, Dirty Unicorns UNOFFICIAL v11.7.2 ROM, Tapatalk 4.9.5
Forum rules
1. Search before posting.
Use one of our search functions before posting or creating a new thread. Whether you have a question or just something new to share, it's very likely that someone has already asked that question or shared that news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thread closed - you may follow the discussion here https://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/status-xposed-oreo-8-0-t3663491