Im looking for a Native 10 bit QHD Oled phone panel with atleast 510 ppi 6,7 inch screen size.
I came at the OnePlus 8 Pro the Oppo Find X3 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11.
The X3 pro is 200 euro's more costly then the oneplus 8 and the xiaomi about 130 euro more.
I had thought the mi 11 had dolby vision but maybe this is only for thexiamoi ultra and the mi 11 Lite?
Seems strange if the base model wouldn't have it but the lite budget version would.
The ultra version doesn't seem to be sold anyway in my country (holland)
chrisssj2 said:
Im looking for a Native 10 bit QHD Oled phone panel with atleast 510 ppi 6,7 inch screen size.
I came at the OnePlus 8 Pro the Oppo Find X3 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11.
The X3 pro is 200 euro's more costly then the oneplus 8 and the xiaomi about 130 euro more.
I had thought the mi 11 had dolby vision but maybe this is only for thexiamoi ultra and the mi 11 Lite?
Seems strange if the base model wouldn't have it but the lite budget version would.
The ultra version doesn't seem to be sold anyway in my country (holland)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the Xiaomi Mi11 and find it fantastic it may not have Dolby vision but it has HDR 10+ 6.8" screen with 1500nits peak brightness, very smooth 480htz sampling and 120htz screen. The sound is amazing for a phone, great camera's and an IR blaster to annoy your friends Down the pub when you turn the TV from footy to a soap. But the choice is yours.
Madmonk33 said:
I have the Xiaomi Mi11 and find it fantastic it may not have Dolby vision but it has HDR 10+ 6.8" screen with 1500nits peak brightness, very smooth 480htz sampling and 120htz screen. The sound is amazing for a phone, great camera's and an IR blaster to annoy your friends Down the pub when you turn the TV from footy to a soap. But the choice is yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes aside from dolby vision the other stats seem perfect.
So what you are saying is only the ultra and the lite version have dolby vision?
@6:22 video color enhancer SDR to HDR technology
@6:25 video image sharpener
@6:35 bright HDR video mode
Do you think the xiaomi mi 11 have similiar options like this?
chrisssj2 said:
Yes aside from dolby vision the other stats seem perfect.
So what you are saying is only the ultra and the lite version have dolby vision?
@6:22 video color enhancer SDR to HDR technology
@6:25 video image sharpener
@6:35 bright HDR video mode
Do you think the xiaomi mi 11 have similiar options like this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say they're both similar just did a side by side comparison on GSM Arena and they are both good, and yes the mi 11 does upscale any videos.
The screenshots you send. Thanks!!! by the way!
1. Seems to do with motions
2. HDR AI enhancement.. I suppose this is only for HDR content
3. Upscale videos that are not native ress to native ress I suppose
Number 3 might be the same as the " video image sharpener" in Oppo
However for SDR to HDR technology and bright HDR video there does not seem to be such option. Now maybe bright HDR video option might not be needed since the firmware already does what it needs to do in a way it lieks or something i dont know.
But the SDR to HDR technology seems really interesting to me. Especially since I will be streaming my desktop to my phone alot. I don't know how useful this is. but if it isn't on the xiaomi 11 might be a shame idk.
Just found this on the oppo site hmm
The O1 Ultra Vision Engine supports Video Image Sharpener and Video Colour Enhancer features, which are implemented only for certain adapted apps.
The Video Image Sharpener is available for Photos and YouTube, whereas the Video Colour Enhancer is available for YouTube.
"You can only enable one of the functions at one time."
Doesn't seem to help with moonlight streaming then I suppose.
Also I see there is an option "enhanced countours",on the Mi 11X though.
chrisssj2 said:
Im looking for a Native 10 bit QHD Oled phone panel with atleast 510 ppi 6,7 inch screen size.
I came at the OnePlus 8 Pro the Oppo Find X3 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 11.
The X3 pro is 200 euro's more costly then the oneplus 8 and the xiaomi about 130 euro more.
I had thought the mi 11 had dolby vision but maybe this is only for thexiamoi ultra and the mi 11 Lite?
Seems strange if the base model wouldn't have it but the lite budget version would.
The ultra version doesn't seem to be sold anyway in my country (holland)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The first time I saw a hdr video on the mi 11 it seems to be very bright but does not have very wide color gamut, so I tested it with my colorimeter . when playing a hdr video it switches to profile that able to get very bright, I think for a medium patch around it measured 1000 nits but the color gamut measure only 83 precept of dci-p3. It not very bad as the high brightness give a perceived look of a more saturated color. When you are on sdr mode, there are very good color profiles. The original color color mode target a SRGB(99%) .It has very low de 2000 and have good white point. You also can change the white point. The p3 color mode target dci-p3(95%).The average of de2000 1.3 ,max 2.9.It does not support hdr as it will switch automatically when watching a hdr video. Also, the dci-p3 mode does not allow very high brightness (not an issue as you won't need it on sdr ). As you lower the brightness you start to crush black on dc dimming, when not on dc dimming it switch the pwm frequency and does not crush blacks until quite low brightness. You can switch to 90 hz mode, and it won't crush black on dc dimming but has green tint (worst while display a gray color), you can change the white level to reduce it . The display has a Diamond sub pixel arrangement and not rgb but still very sharp because of a very high resolution. It is much sharper than a full hd oled with Diamond sub pixel arrangement . I really like this display.I use original color mode with 90 hz . For me, a display that do not crush blacks looks so much better, especially for watching video. I saw so many phones with oled screen that crush black and look not good.
Related
Ok maybe a little dramatic but still - a little disappointing.
I have done a few tests. Played the exact same HDR YouTube videos at the exact same time with my Mate 9 and Mate 10 one above the other in landscape mode. The Mate 9 is MUCH brighter than the Mate 10 on maximum brightness. I have factored turning off auto brightness and turned off Smart resolution etc etc. They also have different colour temperatures even if you set them both to warm, default or cold - they still look different.
I have tried HDR videos on both phones and I see absolutely no difference. I studied the colours so hard. I see absolutely no difference between a 1440p video and a 1080p video playing at the same time. In fact, most times the Mate 9 looks sharper and more vibrant. Also shockingly the Mate 9 offered for example 1080p 60fps option on a video whereas the Mate 10 offered maximum 720p 60fps on the same video. 1080p was nowhere in the list. What the hec! Battery at 100% so no resolution switching to save power.
Basically, it is true 1440p is wasted on a phone. There is no difference on a small screen such as a phone. All these people saying "yeah but X phone only has a 1080p screen" don't realise that it doesn't really matter. It all looks the same.
So I hear the Mate 10 is HDR 10 compatible and yet I don't see it with my eyes. If I am doing something wrong and someone wants to correct me, please DO. I want to be wrong.
What are your tests and opinions?
Despite all this, I still love the phone. ?
I take it all back.
I have discovered YouTube does not show HDR10 output even if the video says so.
ONLY the built in video player supports true HDR10 content.
I downloaded these HDR sample videos from an XDA post:
https://mega.nz/#F!jYwlgbBA!piXwD8sYa7zjsRtjStuAyw
Play them in the default video player and they look stunning. I took a screenshot of a paused video and when opened up in gallery, the colours were bland compared to the actual playing footage. Proof enough.
Phew! This phone is amazing!
Do you get higher peak brightness when in vivid mode ?
AFAIK - Currently Netflix is the only third party app supporting HDR 10 for this phone
Youtube coming soon though,
So, you might want to change your thread title, LoL
tboy2000 said:
I take it all back.
I have discovered YouTube does not show HDR10 output even if the video says so.
ONLY the built in video player supports true HDR10 content.
I downloaded these HDR sample videos from an XDA post:
https://mega.nz/#F!jYwlgbBA!piXwD8sYa7zjsRtjStuAyw
Play them in the default video player and they look stunning. I took a screenshot of a paused video and when opened up in gallery, the colours were bland compared to the actual playing footage. Proof enough.
Phew! This phone is amazing!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i try the videos there,look extremely amazing with very excellent vivid colors
tboy2000 said:
Ok maybe a little dramatic but still - a little disappointing.
I have done a few tests. Played the exact same HDR YouTube videos at the exact same time with my Mate 9 and Mate 10 one above the other in landscape mode. The Mate 9 is MUCH brighter than the Mate 10 on maximum brightness. I have factored turning off auto brightness and turned off Smart resolution etc etc. They also have different colour temperatures even if you set them both to warm, default or cold - they still look different.
I have tried HDR videos on both phones and I see absolutely no difference. I studied the colours so hard. I see absolutely no difference between a 1440p video and a 1080p video playing at the same time. In fact, most times the Mate 9 looks sharper and more vibrant. Also shockingly the Mate 9 offered for example 1080p 60fps option on a video whereas the Mate 10 offered maximum 720p 60fps on the same video. 1080p was nowhere in the list. What the hec! Battery at 100% so no resolution switching to save power.
Basically, it is true 1440p is wasted on a phone. There is no difference on a small screen such as a phone. All these people saying "yeah but X phone only has a 1080p screen" don't realise that it doesn't really matter. It all looks the same.
So I hear the Mate 10 is HDR 10 compatible and yet I don't see it with my eyes. If I am doing something wrong and someone wants to correct me, please DO. I want to be wrong.
What are your tests and opinions?
Despite all this, I still love the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course it's the same because mate 10 comes preset to 1080p lol. And stop listening to tech reviewers the are dumb, only way to see it 1080p and 2k is to use magnifying object like camera or glass etc. I have iPhone 7 plus, LG G6, Moto Z play, Essential phone and the s8 which I sold because of burn in, I don't see the dots pixel on any off them because I don't look for it, they all looks the same some are brighter and vibrant than others. That's it.
Another thing, the max brightness on auto is superior than the manual max brightness. That happen on a bunch of smartphones.
So, it's dumb to compare max brightness with the auto setting turned off.
The best way to compare it, is going outdoor with the auto checked on both and look which one seems brighter.
Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk
Hi all
Maybe I am wrong, but some time ago I could not see HDR mark on the video in YT,
Now with the latest updated (from 21 May) it seems that new app supports HDR on Mate 10 Pro
HDR is working now on YouTube app.
And I want to mention that I've compared mate 10 pro display with samsung S8 plus and S10 plus playing hdr videos and the result is that Mate 10 pro has the most beautiful display, collors are more realistic, there is a huge difference..... Mate 10 pro display is better than samsung one, the clarity is superiour, collors more realistic and it is an oled pannel too. I can't believe that mate 10 pro display is soo good, I'm a Samsung fan but Mate 10 pro impressed me.
liviuionut22 said:
HDR is working now on YouTube app.
And I want to mention that I've compared mate 10 pro display with samsung S8 plus and S10 plus playing hdr videos and the result is that Mate 10 pro has the most beautiful display, collors are more realistic, there is a huge difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They may have some different displays' settings, you've got it?
So, it's a tnin matter – the real test on the same settings.
And we know nothing about yours, dude.
amosk59 said:
They may have some different displays' settings, you've got it?
So, it's a tnin matter – the real test on the same settings.
And we know nothing about yours, dude.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As long as he is happy lol. Anyways its mostly subjective.... nobody cares about some HDR video testing. to this date HDR is barely available for normal youtube content nor other apps etc. so who cares? In the end any decent oled screen with decent brightness will do the job.
amosk59 said:
They may have some different displays' settings, you've got it?
So, it's a tnin matter – the real test on the same settings.
And we know nothing about yours, dude.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Displays were set to vivid to all the phones. Mate 10 pro showed more realistic collours. Test it yourself and see if I am right.
My phone is Mate 10 pro bla l09 single sim model.
The other two phones are from some of my friends.
Galaxy s8 plus refreshes at 1080p with hdr, and at 4k with hdr it runs even harder. Galaxy s10 plus works well in both resolutions. Iven the display resolution is higher on samsung phones the clarity and the colour calibration is better in my mate 10 pro, in my opinion.
I wanna ask how can redmi note 7 have 48mp camera but snapdragon 660 only can afford until 25mp
It's fake 48mp which made by ai algorithm, you need to wait for pro version if you want the real 48mp.
But redmi 7 pro maybe use snapdragon 710 and still snapdragon 710 cant afford for 48mp
Kent Nathanael said:
I wanna ask how can redmi note 7 have 48mp camera but snapdragon 660 only can afford until 25mp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably it uses a custom ISP from sony (IMX 586) and not using the integrated one in the SoC
Kent Nathanael said:
I wanna ask how can redmi note 7 have 48mp camera but snapdragon 660 only can afford until 25mp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the Samsung's sensor do, it's they stick 4 tiny pixels into one big pixel, for brightness in the images, actually there is a 12mpx camera but the result it's from a 48mpx resolution. You can look into it.
It's NOT a fake 48 mp camera. Let me explain,
The camera has physical 48million pixels , same as Sony imx586(used in redmi note 7 pro).
But let's see what's the catch about 12mp thing.
So as i said earlier, SAMSUNG GM1 SENSOR(used in redmi note 7) actually has physical 48million pixels.
What it does is, it treats every 4 pixels as 1 bigger one. So that means when we have 48(million) pixels. And 4 pixels will be bind together and made 1.
Result is we get 12(million) pixels in resulting pic.
Now this is done to get more bright images, so that each Pixel of image can get more light.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prJnWBNFQnY
48MP Camera on Redmi Note 7 explained by C4ETech
it's the same trick used with Xiaomi's latest 20MP or 24MP front facing sensors. it combines 4 pixels into 1 bigger pixel (this is called pixel binning). for example: if you install a custom ROM on the Poco (which has a 20MP front facing camera), it will register as only 5MP, but in reality, you actually capture 20MP, combined into a 5MP picture, this tech helps with low light and creating brighter images.
so basically: the SoC registers the sensor as 12MP, but its truly 48MP.
Kent Nathanael said:
I wanna ask how can redmi note 7 have 48mp camera but snapdragon 660 only can afford until 25mp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1) 25mp is for single camera not for dual
2)It can't, the camera is just an interpolated version of a 12mp sensor thats all. Its just an edit
sssaini007 said:
It's NOT a fake 48 mp camera. Let me explain,
The camera has physical 48million pixels , same as Sony imx586(used in redmi note 7 pro).
But let's see what's the catch about 12mp thing.
So as i said earlier, SAMSUNG GM1 SENSOR(used in redmi note 7) actually has physical 48million pixels.
What it does is, it treats every 4 pixels as 1 bigger one. So that means when we have 48(million) pixels. And 4 pixels will be bind together and made 1.
Result is we get 12(million) pixels in resulting pic.
Now this is done to get more bright images, so that each Pixel of image can get more light.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yah i also think like you but some youtuber in my country they explanted that redmi note 7 would has a small cache to process images
As long as i can take great low light photos i am ok with it.
cwr250 said:
It's fake 48mp which made by ai algorithm, you need to wait for pro version if you want the real 48mp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds like ?️
Processor
Redminote 7 PRO wil be released with Snapdragon 675 Soc
majidamiri15300 said:
it's the same trick used with Xiaomi's latest 20MP or 24MP front facing sensors. it combines 4 pixels into 1 bigger pixel (this is called pixel binning). for example: if you install a custom ROM on the Poco (which has a 20MP front facing camera), it will register as only 5MP, but in reality, you actually capture 20MP, combined into a 5MP picture, this tech helps with low light and creating brighter images.
so basically: the SoC registers the sensor as 12MP, but its truly 48MP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this is fully true
Poco video selfie is just so dark like no native binning at all. This is different to the big pixel like on mi5.
support
harysviewty said:
I don't think this is fully true
Poco video selfie is just so dark like no binning at all. This is different to the big pixel like on mi5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think there is a phone currently that does pixel binning in video, now it's just done in photo.
Binning adds the the brightness of 4 pixels and merge then into a bigger number.
(example: 4 pixels have brightness values of 3,4,5,3 the binned number is 15(3+4+5+3), meaning that pixel is brighter, if it were averaged, it would have had a value of 3.75 ((3+4+5+3)/4) and it's not bigger than the original pixels values, meaning no brightness improvement)
(the real process of binning pixels is actually much more complicated, and simple addition may not be done)
While in video the brightness of individual is averaged(not binned) with neighbouring pixels to make 30 1080p (2.1 Mp) photos per second.
If someone understands the process of real pixel binning, then correct me if i am wrong.
JoraForever said:
I don't think there is a phone currently that does pixel binning in video, now it's just done in photo.
Binning adds the the brightness of 4 pixels and merge then into a bigger number.
(example: 4 pixels have brightness values of 3,4,5,3 the binned number is 15(3+4+5+3), meaning that pixel is brighter, if it were averaged, it would have had a value of 3.75 ((3+4+5+3)/4) and it's not bigger than the original pixels values, meaning no brightness improvement)
(the real process of binning pixels is actually much more complicated, and simple addition may not be done)
While in video the brightness of individual is averaged(not binned) with neighbouring pixels to make 30 1080p (2.1 Mp) photos per second.
If someone understands the process of real pixel binning, then correct me if i am wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lg v30 V35 g7 v40 have super bright mode video, 2x2 4in1 pixel binning in video (4K becoming full HD), + there's adaptive fps for lowlight
HTC has multiframe subsampling processing for lowlight noiseless video
Sony has dual camera sensor fusion (normal & bw) for super high iso lowlight video
No, you're wrong
Binning isn't always about 1+2+3+4= 10, it can also be like 1+2+3+4=10 :4= 2.5 (PureView) or 1+4+4+5=4 or 1+2+3+4=1/2/3/4 (real time hdr)
And there's no averaging in lower resolution normal video processing, it's not even using all the pixels of the full sensor. That's why most flagship use 12mp 4:3 (video is cropped 16:9 8mp 4k), no wasted resolution
harysviewty said:
Lg v30 V35 g7 v40 have super bright mode video, 2x2 4in1 pixel binning in video (4K becoming full HD), + there's adaptive fps for lowlight
HTC has multiframe subsampling processing for lowlight noiseless video
Sony has dual camera sensor fusion (normal & bw) for super high iso lowlight video
No, you're wrong
Binning isn't always about 1+2+3+4= 10, it can also be like 1+2+3+4=10 :4= 2.5 (PureView) or 1+4+4+5=4 or 1+2+3+4=1/2/3/4 (real time hdr)
And there's no averaging in lower resolution normal video processing, it's not even using all the pixels of the full sensor. That's why most flagship use 12mp 4:3 (video is cropped 16:9 8mp 4k), no wasted resolution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did say: "the real process of binning pixels is actually much more complicated, and simple addition may not be done" i was simplifying the technical stuff. Pixel binning is also done by averaging values, though not benefiting brightness but noise reduction.
In video the camera actually sends full frame raw data to the isp, which manipulates the raw sensor data by cropping and subsampling (technically the same as binning by averaging) and then dumping that data on flash memory as a video format.
Most modern phones use subsampling by averaging because it reduces noise.
Many phones have issues with noise while filming in 4k in low light condition because the noise filtering applied to videos must be fast and efficient, where as photo noise filtering is done with much more processing.
The LG super bright video mode is most likely some kind of software trickery that forces 1080p resolution because subsampling reduces noise, and does one of two things either increase iso or increase brightness/contrast in post processing.
JoraForever said:
I did say: "the real process of binning pixels is actually much more complicated, and simple addition may not be done" i was simplifying the technical stuff. Pixel binning is also done by averaging values, though not benefiting brightness but noise reduction.
In video the camera actually sends full frame raw data to the isp, which manipulates the raw sensor data by cropping and subsampling (technically the same as binning by averaging) and then dumping that data on flash memory as a video format.
Most modern phones use subsampling by averaging because it reduces noise.
Many phones have issues with noise while filming in 4k in low light condition because the noise filtering applied to videos must be fast and efficient, where as photo noise filtering is done with much more processing.
The LG super bright video mode is most likely some kind of software trickery that forces 1080p resolution because subsampling reduces noise, and does one of two things either increase iso or increase brightness/contrast in post processing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://en.ids-imaging.com/techtipps-detail/en_techtip-binning-subsampling-or-scaler.html
I believe subsampling =/= averaging
That's why lowlight video from 40mp Huawei mate 20 pro sucks so bad
Lg bright mode is a real time processing, 15-24fps, ev +1 stop (higher than max iso on auto /manual mode), 1/4 max resolution,
I've been wanting to ask this question since, Xiaomi lies a lot when it comes to phone specs. Well, it's cheap, so we can't complain.
Im still undecided weather im going to go with this phone or the realme x2 pro...
The 855+ over the 855 isnt really a big deal for me... But the camera is.
It appears that the realme x2 pros camera gives more realistic colours and contrast over the 9t pro... But its still pretty close to the line...
The MP rating mean nothing as there upscaled MP no the native sensor MP rating. Ive still yet to find the true MP rating for both cameras...
Anyway, Ive asked this in the realme forum too...
Can the camera be put into 25 or 24 fps mode? I do youtube videos and tbh 30p sampling to 25fps is adds flicker... its really not ideal at all...
I would like to be able to record my videos on 25 fps if possible... Can this phone be put in that mode? Maybe with open camera?
My old redmi note 4 cant go into 25fps with open camera... but can this?
Anyway if anyone can let me know
Test it with FiLMiC Pro
majimbo said:
Test it with FiLMiC Pro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant "test it" because i dont own the phone.... Im asking before i buy!
I don't know if there's a way of forcing it but I'm running the Syberia Rom with ANX cam and Urnyx GCam, 4k30/4k60 are options but 4k/25 is not.
Filmic evaluator doesn't report 25hz as an option either just the maximum of 4k60.
Hope that helps!
NutsyUK said:
Im still undecided weather im going to go with this phone or the realme x2 pro...
The 855+ over the 855 isnt really a big deal for me... But the camera is.
It appears that the realme x2 pros camera gives more realistic colours and contrast over the 9t pro... But its still pretty close to the line...
The MP rating mean nothing as there upscaled MP no the native sensor MP rating. Ive still yet to find the true MP rating for both cameras...
Anyway, Ive asked this in the realme forum too...
Can the camera be put into 25 or 24 fps mode? I do youtube videos and tbh 30p sampling to 25fps is adds flicker... its really not ideal at all...
I would like to be able to record my videos on 25 fps if possible... Can this phone be put in that mode? Maybe with open camera?
My old redmi note 4 cant go into 25fps with open camera... but can this?
Anyway if anyone can let me know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. I don't know where you got the info that Realme X2 Pro camera gives more realistic colours because it's not true and it gives oversaturated colours while Mi 9t Pro gives natural and more realistic colours.
2. You can record 24 or 25fps up to 4K on Mi 9T Pro with Filmic Pro(see screenshot below).
MnMchill said:
1. I don't know where you got the info that Realme X2 Pro camera gives more realistic colours because it's not true and it gives oversaturated colours while Mi 9t Pro gives natural and more realistic colours.
2. You can record 24 or 25fps up to 4K on Mi 9T Pro with Filmic Pro(see screenshot below).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's just made things more confusing....
I'm pretty sure that's what side by side comparisons said...
So you're saying the 9t camera IS better?
Though I tried to find that app on playstore and it wouldn't show up... Wither not available in the UK. Or this phone isn't comparable and the store won't show me it... (this phone being my old one)
NutsyUK said:
That's just made things more confusing....
I'm pretty sure that's what side by side comparisons said...
So you're saying the 9t camera IS better?
Though I tried to find that app on playstore and it wouldn't show up... Wither not available in the UK. Or this phone isn't comparable and the store won't show me it... (this phone being my old one)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not saying that 9t pro camera is better, it's about the same or a little bit worse than on x2 pro. I'm saying that 9t pro camera gives more natural and realistic photos compared to oversaturated and oversharpened photos on x2 pro.
I don't know why you can't find Filmic pro, it's the best app of that type. Here you have link to that app so try to open it and you will know the reason why you can't find it(instead of install there should be red letters notification telling you is it your phone's fault or your region's fault):
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.filmic.filmicpro
Yeah its in the store but just not compatible with my old redmi note 4, its mediatek... sooooo old.... so hidden on my store when i view with my phone....
So this sharpening and saturation. isnt the sensor is software?
NutsyUK said:
Yeah its in the store but just not compatible with my old redmi note 4, its mediatek... sooooo old.... so hidden on my store when i view with my phone....
So this sharpening and saturation. isnt the sensor is software?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
MnMchill said:
1. I don't know where you got the info that Realme X2 Pro camera gives more realistic colours because it's not true and it gives oversaturated colours while Mi 9t Pro gives natural and more realistic colours.
2. You can record 24 or 25fps up to 4K on Mi 9T Pro with Filmic Pro(see screenshot below).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because filmic pro says it allows recording in 24 fps doesn't mean that the footage will be 24 fps. On my old SGS4 I have 30, 25 and 24 fps available but the footage is always 30 fps.
In order to establish what you can do, you need to make a test capture and then check it with mediainfo app.
Sent from my GT-I9506 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:54 PM ----------
NutsyUK said:
Yeah its in the store but just not compatible with my old redmi note 4, its mediatek... sooooo old.... so hidden on my store when i view with my phone....
So this sharpening and saturation. isnt the sensor is software?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what did you buy in the end?
24 fps is available?
Sent from my GT-I9506 using Tapatalk
DonAndress said:
Just because filmic pro says it allows recording in 24 fps doesn't mean that the footage will be 24 fps. On my old SGS4 I have 30, 25 and 24 fps available but the footage is always 30 fps.
In order to establish what you can do, you need to make a test capture and then check it with mediainfo app.
Sent from my GT-I9506 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 04:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:54 PM ----------
So what did you buy in the end?
24 fps is available?
Sent from my GT-I9506 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive not got it yet but im leaning on realme x2 pro... Im in the process of hopefully getting a decent job. If things look good ill be ordering from amazon. Even though the price has just gone up on the white version
Also looks like eglobal are scaling back the mi9t pro and have bumped the price up a little... soooooooo realme is looking more attractive again :/
NutsyUK said:
soooooooo realme is looking more attractive again :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool.
Give us a shout if you're happy with x2 pro recording quality and features (like the 24 fps or flat profile).
Sent from my GT-I9506 using Tapatalk
In xiaomi's product page they have mentioned that redmi note 10 pro is capable of producing billions of colors, so does that mean it has a 10bit panel?
Yes. It does. It's an AMOLED 1080p HDR10 display with 1100 nits peek brightness.
HDR10 refers to 10bit display.
Only 8-bit color, not 10-bit. Mi 11 is 10-bit.
MPK99 said:
Yes. It does. It's an AMOLED 1080p HDR10 display with 1100 nits peek brightness.
HDR10 refers to 10bit display.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NOOOO! HDR10 is just a standard that supports 10-bit color. The screen still supports only 8-bit color but with HDR10 (up to 1000 nits brightness) and apparently 100% DCI-P3 coverage. Still pretty good for this price.
varungupta3009 said:
NOOOO! HDR10 is just a standard that supports 10-bit color. The screen still supports only 8-bit color but with HDR10 (up to 1000 nits brightness) and apparently 100% DCI-P3 coverage. Still pretty good for this price.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. I couldn't edit my old comment somehow, but ya note 10/pro/max series none of them are 10 bit panels. Just HDR certified.
MPK99 said:
You're right. I couldn't edit my old comment somehow, but ya note 10/pro/max series none of them are 10 bit panels. Just HDR certified. Well, there's not much difference between 8 bit colors & 10 bit colors when it comes to a smartphone. It can be distinguished in TVs mostly. For phones, it's not mandatory for more greater picture quality. 8 bit is enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about the "billion colors" claim on their site? https://www.mi.com/in/redmi-note-10-pro/
Is that false advertising?
clintzo said:
In xiaomi's product page they have mentioned that redmi note 10 pro is capable of producing billions of colors, so does that mean it has a 10bit panel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it isn't 10 bit it's 8 bit