So I decided to run a geekbench benchmark on my tablet out of curiosity last night, and then we got an OTA update today and ran another benchmark assuming they would be identical, and the results show a much lower score now, especially single core performance.
Pre update
Lenovo Lenovo TB-9707F - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Lenovo Lenovo TB-9707F with an ARM Qualcomm processor.
browser.geekbench.com
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Post update
Lenovo Lenovo TB-9707F - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Lenovo Lenovo TB-9707F with an ARM Qualcomm processor.
browser.geekbench.com
Related
Out of curiousity of what the nexus s scores, and because i know already what dual core phones score in the CF-Bench benchmarking app. id like to see what you all are scoring with my favorite single core phone, the nexus s. if you own other single core phones, please post theCF-Bench score here too. to start with, this is my first round of benching with this app. this is Trinity1.576ghz on top of the latest cm7 kang..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
With UV
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
UV does not have effect on your benchmark scores ! (unlees you combine uv to get higher oc)
Here are mine's. (1.4ghz)
keltsi95 said:
Here are mine's. (1.4ghz)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nice...!
Here is mine @1.4GHz.
Latest Cyanogen Kang
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hello guys. Couple of days before I had runned antutu benchmark and it showed 75k score, today I have runned it on 100% of battery and it showed 126k score. Is it normal? I have watched other reviews on the internet and there shows how p10 reaches 145k score or more. What could happened here? That it reached only 75k?
Maybe something was working in background like notification handling, auto updating etc.
I'm getting 122k points in AnTuTu as well.
I'm very curious how YT reviewers managed to get 145k score on P10.
I suspect that the firmware update from Huawei that "fixed" overheating issue just lowered CPU freq
I have a rather old PC here running an Intel Q9550 processor.
Problem is when trying to start an emulator in Android studio it gets killed immediately.
The processor has only 1st gen. virtualization (VT-x, VT-d) but not 2nd gen. (SLAT/EPT), see
Re: Is Intel VT-x/EPT not supported by Q9550?
Actually, both VT-x and VT-d are supported by the (vPro-enabled) Q9550 processor. In order for these features to be used, this processor must be combined with a vPro-enabled chipset. I see that the Dell Optiplex 870 indeed has a vPro-enabled chipset, namely Q45, so these features should be...
community.intel.com
and results running systeminfo in cmd prompt:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
so I'm wondering if that could be the reason the emulators get killed everytime.
Thanks.
Hi! Have you noticed bad gaming experience after recent updates? Previously I was able to reach about 40+ FPS on Geshin Impact (highest settings) but nowadays barely 30 FPS. I am using dynamic profile since Performance is even worse. Benchmark scores are also lower.
Software version is 31.1004.0404.81 and there is not newer OTA. Updated manually from Android 11 to 12. You can find example videos from channel (check signature).
There was a new OTA released like last week, you can manually update to it if you want to test it (Android12: .0404.92)
Installed .92 update but it did not help. Performance is still bad.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I new my pixel 6 pro felt faster than pixel 7 in every way, p6p even finishes bench marks faster to and less heating, did I do a down grade or what lol
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It's just a GPU compute benchmark, stuff that does not really matter that much in day to day use or in games. GPU in Tensor G2 has less cores, but they are good amount more capable for raster rendering, so the whole GPU shouldn't be worse for 3D rendering, from what I know.
I agree with xenotium. SOC's today are so fast and specialized that even the mid-level ones can do most of the work most people need done. Benchmarks just don't mean much for average everyday use.