Of all the overclocked under voltage kernels which one is closer to the stock kernal? Pershoots is great but Miami has poor reception, atleast in my neighborhood. And my reception is a bit weaker now because of it. I'm looking for an oc kernel for my n1 that is closest to stock voltage. Any help is more than appreciated, thanks!
anyone? 10char
I can't find any info on this at all, I guess ill try and pm or email the good folks who made the kernels.
Related
Hey guys
First of all, my apologies if such request has already been made. I searched for "pershoot kernel no uv" and "pershoot kernel stock voltage" and came up empty handed.
As the title says, I'm looking for a kernel similar to pershoot's, with all its tweaks except for the undervolting.
The reason for this: I love the speed, the audio boost, capacitive buttons fix, BUT I'm noticing an impact on signal strength from the radio. I remember reading a horror story from a user here who thought using and UV'ed kernel killed his radio and I'm getting nervous.
For reference I have on hand 3 nexus's. All AT&T versions, 2 of them dead stock, 1 (mine) rooted, running Rodriguezstyle's v2.3fix froyo rom with pershoot's oc uv .33.4 kernel. I'm getting anywhere from -10 to -20 db's less in my signal meter in my phone as compared to the stock ones. It sucks since my rooted one completely smokes the other two when it comes to features and speed.
I'd like to go back to stock voltage and see if my signal reception improves. I hope it hasn't caused damage to the radio.
Thank you!
Uh bump? I'm now using a rooted FRF83 stock ROM with the stock kernel and my signal reception is definitely better but I already miss pershoot's... Anybody got a suggestion? Thanks!
Out of curiousity. Is there an oc kernel out there that's stock voltage, or atleast not too under voltaged?
Do you not enjoy the extra battery life? 1.275v is the stock and anything below 900-950mv seems to decrease the radios. You might want to edit the source and recompile because most people don't have a problem with the undervolting on most kernels (when done correctly).
evilkorn said:
Do you not enjoy the extra battery life? 1.275v is the stock and anything below 900-950mv seems to decrease the radios. You might want to edit the source and recompile because most people don't have a problem with the undervolting on most kernels (when done correctly).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im willing to sacrifice battery life for the ability to stop dropping calls. Although Miami has hspa+ T-Mobile foot print here is spotty. I fluctuate between edge n 3g way too much. Every rooted nexus owner I know has that issue here. My brother has a stock nexus and he doesn't fluctuate as much as me...
Where can I find the stock frg kernel or frf kernel?
MoDaCo uses stock boot images I believe.
evilkorn said:
MoDaCo uses stock boot images I believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank-you
10 char
Hey folks,
It was requested of me to make a thread regarding this. I have compiled an alternative kernel for aosp based roms. It should work with any of them.
1.0
All governors enabled, interactive patched in, conservative as default
Anticipatory scheduler vs. deadline ins stock cm6
Supports wired tethering
Latest source (may be newer than cm6?)
tun.ko support for vpn
More will be added later.
Thank you Koush, for providing me the fix for screen tearing and thanks sniffle, for helping me with making the kernel work with aosp
http://adrynalyne.us/files/kernels/cm6_ruby/
Source:
http://adrynalyne.us/files/kernels/cm6_ruby/source/
Nice job buddy! Thank you! I'll give it a shot tonight.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
oh hell yea.
maybe this will help all us aosp guys get a stable phone to use...
Just loaded it up. Will be back. To report.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
dnoyeb said:
oh hell yea.
maybe this will help all us aosp guys get a stable phone to use...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the plan
Any plans to get undervolt and oc?
Trying now, thanks...
Is there a place I can find the Stock CM6 kernal, in case I don't like this one? Ill report back in a little bit
Its slower than the CM6 kernal. I ran a linpack of 27 and quadrant of 1277. This was both running "performance" mode, and turning set cpu to the max which was 1000. I Am going to give it a try, maybe the battery life will make up for the performance loss. If not, nandroid here I come.
bradm23 said:
Trying now, thanks...
Is there a place I can find the Stock CM6 kernal, in case I don't like this one? Ill report back in a little bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ditto request backup stock cm6 kernel
I just hope it fixes my WiFi shutting off constantly.
Seems to be really solid, a bit slower than cm-6 but also took care my screen flicker and haven't found any negatives yet (1.0+ hr up time) . Looking forward to some overclock variations. Thanks for the work adrynalyne.
bradm23 said:
Its slower than the CM6 kernal. I ran a linpack of 27 and quadrant of 1277. This was both running "performance" mode, and turning set cpu to the max which was 1000. I Am going to give it a try, maybe the battery life will make up for the performance loss. If not, nandroid here I come.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what to tell you. The Sense version of this kernel has considerably better than that.
adrynalyne said:
Not sure what to tell you. The Sense version of this kernel has considerably better than that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.
bradm23 said:
I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?
unstable for me on 9/10 nightly wifi on and no setcpu, 3 random lockups/reboots in past 2 hrs
32.61 linpack and 1341 quadrant. Its not much slower than cm-6. @adrynalyn, do you plan on bumping up the clock speeds? Mine is showing 1000 max btw. Thanks again
I wasn't complaining. I will take a slightly slower kernal thats rock solid and great battery, vs a quicker but less stable.. sorry I came off like i was complaining. I really appreciate all your hard work, thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It shows 1k for me too
Yeah I plan on some future bumps.
THANK YOU ADRYNALYNE!!!!!!!!!! I was so pumped when you told me you did this .
adrynalyne said:
Oh I didn't take it as such.
I just don't know why
Unless the scheduler differences are doing it. Its possible.
Did you say that the top speed showed 1000 in setcpu vs. 998400?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1k max for me as well. 998 didn't seem to be an option.
I'm getting similar performance as I get with kernels i compiled from koush's source where i only changed cpu speeds for overclocking and udervolting. Not as fast as koush's even when i bumped it up to 1.19Ghz. Which i couldn't figure out why since i used exact same source
Hello to everybody who has taken the time out to help me with my question!
Thanks to the devs also that make this happen.
Ok i have been elsewhere since i have gotten my UK gt-i9000 (playing with cfw on ps3)
i have since returned and thought i would give it a go.
i would like to know what kernel i can use which will push my i9000 to the highest oc frequencies as i am only finding kernels that are limited.
either a kernel with no limit to oc
or mabey a the highest known kernel
Thanks for your help guys
Don't mind helping you out here
KERNEL][VoodooSnd4-VSF-OC-TRCU-BFQ-ZRAM] Super Optimized Kernel 4_8_1 STABLE [02-28]:
OC frequencies (1200-1300-1400-1500-1600)
this is the highest possible as far as I know.
if you want true speed in 3d games go for darky 9.4 with damiangto
his new beta kernel can go to 1280, which should be enough for most people. Together with some undervolting, your battery keeps some juice left and your phone stays under the 45 degrees.
post of the kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=12331961&postcount=3069
His normal stable kernel goes to 1200 mhz, which can be considered safe. and its still really fast.
So far my advice
1.2GHz laststufo's 4.8.3
Which of the current 2.3 ROMs is considered the fastest/most responsive? Or which ROM would be considered the fastest based on the mods & tweaks used by the developers? I'm not to versed in the technical side of things to discern which tweaks/mods/kernels/etc give way to the most stability, speed, and response and would like the community's opinions on the matter.
Probably CM7, I just started using it and there is never any lag. I haven't even OC'd it yet. This also comes with the price of having to live off a wall charger though.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
If you mean fastest in clock speeds, then thats a balance betwen rawr clock and how much battery life you can get out of it. Keep in mind these phones clock easily 1.2ghz-1.3ghz no issues past that you need to increase the voltage. So you can in theory get 1.6ghz-1.8ghz but you will live next to a charger. If you mean fastest on how it feels Id have to say Continuum moved awesome few months back (haven't used it in a while) Atomic Fusion if the ext4 version comes out. But there you should just test them out.
On a side not if you want to OC your phone and not have to pay for the oc app, then Id suggest you stick to I9000 ports or AOSP's like CM7 or MIUI. Native roms like Cognition 5, Atomic Fusion and Nuclear Fusion need Tegrak for OC/UV.
Which of the I9000s seem to run the fastest/smoothest? I've been looking at Dlev and Darky but how does Apex/Symply GS II/Mosaic/Sensation compare?
prbassplayer said:
Keep in mind these phones clock easily 1.2ghz-1.3ghz no issues past that you need to increase the voltage. So you can in theory get 1.6ghz-1.8ghz but you will live next to a charger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually read in the Glitch kernel thread that when overclocking, higher voltages doesn't always mean more stability. I'm OC'd at 1.5ghz right now really stable and I was UV'd at -50mv but I just dropped it to -75mv to see if its stable there. I'll keep dropping it till I have issues.
Oh yeah, and CM7's battery life has got WAY better over time, so I'm not having to worry about charging all the time either.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S Captivate
Reamer09 said:
I actually read in the Glitch kernel thread that when overclocking, higher voltages doesn't always mean more stability. I'm OC'd at 1.5ghz right now really stable and I was UV'd at -50mv but I just dropped it to -75mv to see if its stable there. I'll keep dropping it till I have issues.
Oh yeah, and CM7's battery life has got WAY better over time, so I'm not having to worry about charging all the time either.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S Captivate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From my experience to maintain a stable phone i over volt the "step" that's overclocked, and then undervolt the other "steps". Im by no means a expert nor is there a full proof way to do it. Each phone kinda reacts differently on the overclocking past 1.2-1.3ghz.
Which of the I9000 roms should theoretically run faster due to the tweaks/mods used by the developers without the need to overclock?
There if no need to overclock for daily use. Only if you are playing very demanding games. And only during those games.
As for fastest rom....have a search this question gets asked a lot with always the same answer and result:
There is no best rom, all phones are different as well as tastes, what's best for me on my device may not be on yours. Flash and try a few and make you own decision...
CM7 is fastest but Display and Sound quality is not as good as stock ROM .
Before school started for me and i couldnt access a charger when i wanted to, i used MIUI at a stable 1.6 GHz ALL of the time with odemand govenor and i got like 18 hours with moderate use, on Glitch V12! And you dont need to overvolt for higher speeds i have tested it and its better to undervolt higher clocks, i get better battery and performance!
Sent from my Stock KH3/4 2.3.4 Captivate using the XDA Premium App!
For the 10th time Each phone reacts differently to Overclocking. There is no sure way to get it OC/Uv. On my phone past 1.2ghz i need to over volt.
prbassplayer said:
For the 10th time Each phone reacts differently to Overclocking. There is no sure way to get it OC/Uv. On my phone past 1.2ghz i need to over volt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i ran 1.6 GHz undervolted at ever clock speed fine, had better performance than over volting, so its different
Sent from my Stock KH3/4 2.3.4 Captivate using the XDA Premium App!