Apps2SD greyed out.... - G1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Yeah, first thing the 'uber coders' will think is 'google it' or 'rtfm'. Well been all over and still can't get it to work. But I'll jump though the hoops and hopefully someone will point out where the missing information is. As much documentation that is out there for Android, there is much left to be desired and checked for clarity. So here it goes:
After having many issues with Clockwork Mod recovery, I finally got AmonRA installed and was able to install CM5.0.7 (8 would not install properly at all...too many broken thing like FCs on settings and such).
Things I have done to try to get Apps2SD working:
1/ Manually partitioned SD card
2/ Use Recovery option to partition the card (converted to EXT4 as per Cyanogen's suggestion)
3/ Tried following advice here: http://code.google.com/p/android-roms/wiki/A2SD
4/ Tried following advice here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=520582
- which leads to here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=3879988&postcount=41 (which seriously need to be re-written.you can't type adb push while already in adb shell....not recognized)
5/ Ubuntu's Disk Utility tells me the EXT4 partition is clean.
So where to go from here? Nothing seems to make any sort of impact on this phone.

...to the QnA section.....
have you enabled apps2sd?
Settings>Applications and tick the Apps2SD box

Moved as not development.

garok89 said:
...to the QnA section.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, looking now....so far I've got 3 tabs opened because of that....this process is seriously sad. Why are there so many ways (some more poorly written than others) to do the same damn thing that the ROM is supposed to do itself? Don't worry, I'll try yet again another set of instructions to get this to work. Geeze....wasn't this hard the last time I enabled it. Seriously, I do't know why I torture myself with this....
garok89 said:
have you enabled apps2sd?
Settings>Applications and tick the Apps2SD box
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See, now that's just insulting. Although I will forgive you if you have some sort of mental deficiency and missed reading the subject of this thread.....but just in case, I'll return the favour. If "Apps2SD" is greyed out, that means I am at Settings/Applications and quite have the capability to select option on the phone by pressing/touching the screen. Guess what.....it stayed greyed out. This is why I have a new thread here with the 5 other things that I've read, quite exhaustively, to whit there have been no positive results.

So, following the directions outline here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=534714
NO freaking change. This is on a fresh ROM install of 5.0.7. Seriously, My card size in 8GB, like his, so I used almost his numbers, just a few bytes different, and nada.
Talk about a sad state.
Yes I repartitioned the card, yes I wiped the partitions (after reinstalling the first time and getting nothing but FCs, wiped each section available in the Amon RA recovery menu....three times each.)
So, let's try yet another method.....
I downloaded Apps2SD.apk. Installed it and ran it....guess what...it aid my card wasn't paritioned?!?! Umm....wft? Why the hell was CM NOT seeing the paritions? This card has been partitioned at least 20 times in the last month, in various methods. Yeah, this i good for it's lifespan....
So I went through it's partitioning process...guess what...still greyed out.
Opened the app again... "It looks like your SD cars isn't partitioned..."...are you kidding me?? (yes the app was granted Super User permissions when it ran....)
So....where do I find the part in CM that is broken and not allowing Apps2SD to work?

How is it that after wiping each item THREE TIMES in th recovery list, and a FRESH INSTALL that my background is still the same????
What is not being wiped?

with 2.1 theres an option for all your settings to be backed up to google. if your background is stored in the same folder on the fat32 partition of your sd card, when you load the new rom, your phone will set your background to what it was.
i know because i went from 5.07 with one background to jubeh's 2.2 with another background, needed gps, wiped EVERYTHING(data, system, ext partition etc.) in RAmon's recovery, flashed 5.08 and had my old background from 5.07 set, along with all my old apps downloading automatically...half hour later and my phone was done syncing and set up exactly how i like it, w/o me doing anythin.
that's how your background is still the same. =P
edit: looking at your signature..is your ext fs first on your sd card? i might be wrong but i think the fat32 needs to be first???

JadedTech said:
Nope, looking now....so far I've got 3 tabs opened because of that....this process is seriously sad. Why are there so many ways (some more poorly written than others) to do the same damn thing that the ROM is supposed to do itself? Don't worry, I'll try yet again another set of instructions to get this to work. Geeze....wasn't this hard the last time I enabled it. Seriously, I do't know why I torture myself with this....
See, now that's just insulting. Although I will forgive you if you have some sort of mental deficiency and missed reading the subject of this thread.....but just in case, I'll return the favour. If "Apps2SD" is greyed out, that means I am at Settings/Applications and quite have the capability to select option on the phone by pressing/touching the screen. Guess what.....it stayed greyed out. This is why I have a new thread here with the 5 other things that I've read, quite exhaustively, to whit there have been no positive results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i was not attempting to be insulting, i run the cmupdater support and have received numerous "app2sd is greyed out" emails when in fact it was the "move to sd" that was greyed out, not the apps2sd toggle. so get down from your high horse and dont assume that you are better than anyone else. in my experience dealing with hundreds of support requests, i have found it is the person who asks the question, not the people who attempt to help, who are the problem.
"computers don't make mistakes, people using computers make mistakes" comes to mind...
although ubuntu is showing it as clean, choose the "repair SD.ext" option in the recovery...
and although it is unlikely to correct it, fix apk uid mismatches. apps2sd can be a funny thing which can work one day and not the other at times.....
i dont know why i am still trying to help you after pretty much calling me mentally retarded, but hey....
oh, and by "the qna section" i meant that you asked a question in the development area, ie. the wrong section

See, now that's just insulting. Although I will forgive you if you have some sort of mental deficiency and missed reading the subject of this thread.....but just in case, I'll return the favour. If "Apps2SD" is greyed out, that means I am at Settings/Applications and quite have the capability to select option on the phone by pressing/touching the screen. Guess what.....it stayed greyed out. This is why I have a new thread here with the 5 other things that I've read, quite exhaustively, to whit there have been no positive results.[/QUOTE]
you have to have a partition and it will not be greyed out

Either the poor behavior in this thread is going to stop or I'll close it. There is no need to be insulting in any way.

garok89 said:
i was not attempting to be insulting, i run the cmupdater support and have received numerous "app2sd is greyed out" emails when in fact it was the "move to sd" that was greyed out, not the apps2sd toggle. so get down from your high horse and dont assume that you are better than anyone else. in my experience dealing with hundreds of support requests, i have found it is the person who asks the question, not the people who attempt to help, who are the problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, a few things to clear:
1/ This has truly been one of my frustrating experiences in all the tech I have ever played with (and that's pushing 30 years). Granted you would not know my experiences and my tenaciousness in following directions, despite them having me going off-the-beaten-path because something does not fit any proposed remedy.
What was insulting was the fact that you assumed that I wouldn't check the most basic thing when the ONLY indication that Apps2SD was not working was that tick being greyed out. But that would be because I didn't go into great detail about that. I was kinda hoping that was a given because without it being ticked, it obviously doesn't work.
So, since there was some bas assumptions made, allow me to be the first to apologize deeply and hopefully we can move forward.
garok89 said:
"computers don't make mistakes, people using computers make mistakes" comes to mind...
although ubuntu is showing it as clean, choose the "repair SD.ext" option in the recovery...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did that, no change. Although I will add in that your quote applies just as well to programmers as it does the users
garok89 said:
and although it is unlikely to correct it, fix apk uid mismatches. apps2sd can be a funny thing which can work one day and not the other at times.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, doesn't seem to work at all here.<shrug>
garok89 said:
i dont know why i am still trying to help you after pretty much calling me mentally retarded, but hey....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be because I think you recognized how frustrated I have been and in reality, I'm not really venting at you but at the lack of a solution, despite there being soo many ways to supposedly fix this issue. That would also be because you are most likely the kind of techie that hates to see things not work and will spend more time trying to fix it rather than give in and simply 'reinstall' because you want to know the reason why it happened in the first place. Maybe I'm wrong there, maybe I'm not. I'm am seriously glad that you are taking your time because not a single other person has.
garok89 said:
oh, and by "the qna section" i meant that you asked a question in the development area, ie. the wrong section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I forgot to apologize to the mod for that. Sorry Mod....
So, have any other ideas how to fix this? I am rather loathe to just try to 'update in hopes that it automagically fixes the issue' approach.

tdt1345 said:
you have to have a partition and it will not be greyed out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might want to read my first post again.....
"Things I have done to try to get Apps2SD working:
1/ Manually partitioned SD card"

jamesd86 said:
with 2.1 theres an option for all your settings to be backed up to google. if your background is stored in the same folder on the fat32 partition of your sd card, when you load the new rom, your phone will set your background to what it was.
i know because i went from 5.07 with one background to jubeh's 2.2 with another background, needed gps, wiped EVERYTHING(data, system, ext partition etc.) in RAmon's recovery, flashed 5.08 and had my old background from 5.07 set, along with all my old apps downloading automatically...half hour later and my phone was done syncing and set up exactly how i like it, w/o me doing anythin.
that's how your background is still the same. =P
edit: looking at your signature..is your ext fs first on your sd card? i might be wrong but i think the fat32 needs to be first???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah...I realized this after I left the house and was getting into the car. Just too frustrated when I posted. It was one of those 'don't drink and drive' but more of a 'don't vent and post' type of deals....well, at least not here. Thanks any ways.

have you tried ext2 before upgrading to ext4?
ext4 didnt like my spare g1 too much....but my main one got along fine with it

JadedTech said:
1/ Manually partitioned SD card"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the partition system ids correct:
Code:
# fdisk /dev/block/mmcblk0
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/block/mmcblk0: 8166 MB, 8166309888 bytes
252 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1020 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 15624 * 512 = 7999488 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/block/mmcblk0p1 1 952 7436993 b Win95 FAT32
/dev/block/mmcblk0p2 953 1020 531216 83 Linux
Command (m for help):
The 'b' for the vfat partition and '83' for ext
The startup scripts use there values for some autodetection in cm5.
If all you change is the Id data wont be lost but you are at fault if you don't backup.

garok89 said:
have you tried ext2 before upgrading to ext4?
ext4 didnt like my spare g1 too much....but my main one got along fine with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a very interesting observation as I have been automatically upgradeding to EXT4 (as I did read that is what Cyanogen uses...figured if it was good enough for him....) so I just reformatted my SD card from the Recovery partition into EXT2 with a 32MBswap and the rest in FAT32. No change. Damn....seemed like one of those 'simple and yet not obvious' type of answers that may have worked too...

ezterry said:
Is the partition system ids correct:
Code:
# fdisk /dev/block/mmcblk0
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/block/mmcblk0: 8166 MB, 8166309888 bytes
252 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1020 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 15624 * 512 = 7999488 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/block/mmcblk0p1 1 952 7436993 b Win95 FAT32
/dev/block/mmcblk0p2 953 1020 531216 83 Linux
Command (m for help):
The 'b' for the vfat partition and '83' for ext
The startup scripts use there values for some autodetection in cm5.
If all you change is the Id data wont be lost but you are at fault if you don't backup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now this produced something interesting.
Code:
# fdisk /dev/block/mmcblk0
The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 243328.
There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
and could in certain setups cause problems with:
1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., old versions of LILO)
2) booting and partitioning software from other OSs
(e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK)
Command (m for help):
#
So, how does one go about fixing this if this is the reason that "in certain setups cause problems"? This seems to be a likely candidate for the root of the issue.
Redo partitions in Fdisk?

instead of doing it from recovery
do it from ubuntu via gparted

Sorry for jumping in here but... A while back Dusty wrote a great tut for doing this correctly. Did you follow his thread instructions? If not, take a look. It may have the key to your happiness.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=534714&highlight=51dusty

JadedTech said:
So, how does one go about fixing this if this is the reason that "in certain setups cause problems"? This seems to be a likely candidate for the root of the issue.
Redo partitions in Fdisk?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The size warning only applies to the short falls of BIOS booting x86 PCs. We don't boot the dream from the sdcard or is the phone booted with a x86 BIOS...
If it was you need to ensure the boot partition is near to the beginning of the disk.. you can safely ignore it

Related

RECOVERY ROM Flash… thru USB from PC ?? (no SD)

I wound up with a non functioning SD card reader after downgrading to dreaIMG. I managed to get a USB connection, after much, fuss to my PC. I am running a program (Droid Explorer) on my P.C. which, among it’s many functions, appears to allow you to upgrade your ROM and install programs from its PC UI. any body gone this route? Would you recommend ?
NOTE: I messed with the SD and usb connection for days, new SD cards, reformatting them every which way, and fiddled with the setup on the android (once registered). I suspect the ROM was corrupt and recover process might just fix it. If it dosn't’t I certainly want to finish the whole process anyway.
The keyboard is the size of my shaky thumbs, I’m dyslexic, far sighted and can only hunt and peck on a regular keyboard. There is absolutely no way I could blindly pump the arcane commands I’ve seen around that might let me finish. (I tried typing “am start -a android.intent.action.MAIN -n com.android.settings/.Settings” 21 times and never got it right)
So, if some one can confirm this USB to PC flash is a valid method (DroidExplorer or other), I guess It would just be like using the PC as a gigantic SD card, I would be jazzed. Right now, cant’ use the keyboard, and can’t use the SD, I see no other way to finish the job. (unless I could install a command prompt thing on the phone to see what I’m doing…still no SD.
Thanks in advance
\PK
Questions in general belong in the Q&A forum, not the Development forum. Questions regarding Droid Explorer, being an app, belong in the Apps forum.
Repost there and you'll likely get help. Here, you're likely to get flamed.
You can definitely flash images directly to the device (without use of the SD card), however, you cannot use update packages, but instead images. You will need separate recovery, boot and system images, and either apply them with the flash_image tool through adb, or through fastboot.
The flash_image route is going to be a bit difficult, since you need to have enough room on the internal RAM to keep a copy of the image you are flashing. (Perhaps you can overwrite the existing backup version ...)
In either case, this is not the best forum to be posting these questions. Obviously, you best course would have been in the Q&A (rather self-explanatory), or as another posted recommended, under Apps.
[Removed as duplicate]
Now that this post has been moved to Q&A: To the OP --
Have you tried issuing the "mount" command via console while in recovery? I.e.;
Code:
#mount /sdcard
I've had it come up where the /sdcard itself wasn't mounting properly.
Otherwise you're stuck flashing a full .NBH file via Fastboot, insofar as I am aware.
IConrad01 said:
Questions in general belong in the Q&A forum, not the Development forum. Questions regarding Droid Explorer, being an app, belong in the Apps forum.
Repost there and you'll likely get help. Here, you're likely to get flamed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I've been obssed and frutrated for 3 days/ Total lack of responce here (Q&A) and elswhere. I did a new search and everything resembling my issue was wherever my origional post was on xda, not Q&A.
Any way, I'll stay away. pk
rpcameron said:
You can definitely flash images directly to the device (without use of the SD card), however, you cannot use update packages, but instead images. You will need separate recovery, boot and system images, and either apply them with the flash_image tool through adb, or through fastboot.
The flash_image route is going to be a bit difficult, since you need to have enough room on the internal RAM to keep a copy of the image you are flashing. (Perhaps you can overwrite the existing backup version ...)
In either case, this is not the best forum to be posting these questions. Obviously, you best course would have been in the Q&A (rather self-explanatory), or as another posted recommended, under Apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I appreciate your reply very informative
1)if I reconstruct a zip file and get 3 or4 bin or img files, how do I determine which goes first?
2) Do they need to be renamed? if so, to what?
3) "The flash_image route is going to be a bit difficult" . so your saying that my P.C will not be behaving like an SD card? but just a dump truck?
4)n Sorry for crashing the party. I bought this thing on Ebay 4 days ago "for parts" and knew zip about it. I Posted several times in the Q&A section and pretty much got "format SD to fat 32"...Very well meaning but page one of every g1 how to.
Without bugging you guys, I know I'm a noob, but in 3 days I took this 50 buck T-mobile with no usb, no wifi, no bluetooth, no-way to input through the keyboard, no SD and, nothing on the screen but a 3 page sign up sheet for to google...to a functioning AT&T phone with most of the perks working.
I just want to finish the job, I think with a proper flash, the remaining probs. might go away. All I was looking for was a morsel of direction, not "format fat32", and you gave it!!
Thank you, PK
IConrad01 said:
Now that this post has been moved to Q&A: To the OP --
Have you tried issuing the "mount" command via console while in recovery? I.e.;
Code:
#mount /sdcard
I've had it come up where the /sdcard itself wasn't mounting properly.
Otherwise you're stuck flashing a full .NBH file via Fastboot, insofar as I am aware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Ico...,
Yes, I have now. No luck. I resigned to the fact that I will have to install from my PC... for now. I tried out this little utility, Droid Explorer. It is the exactly what I think an interface should be. It's takes al these monstrous tasks an packs them m into a little windows type app. But, you have to heave a ROCK-SOLID connection.
I just have to think I had a bum DreaIMG rom. it loaded up from my SD card and installed swimmingly with a cheery concluding "SUCCESSFULLY INSTALLED!!". After that the card(s) were never to be recognized again. I wonder if I could Just get a normal usb-to-mini usb adapter and plug a thumb drive in, install of that.
Last night I got it to be recognized by my PC a little better, but, I still can't really transfer anything. (I also managed to inadvertently run up $208.00 in "data fees"...no bloody clue").
I've been following a different wiki every day. It seems as though most of them are outdated by a week or so (history). I think my problem lies in usb drivers because installations seems always seem inconclusive as to weather there there or not and adb seems to misbehave.
Chow

Misc partition: Why does it die? How do I fix it?

This is a long thread because I'm trying to provide the maximum detail possible in the hopes of luring some experts to assist. I am a developer with 30+ years experience, though with little *nix experience, since I hitched my wagon to WinTel when people stopped hiring assembly programmers and the term "GUI" began appearing in help wanted ads.
Yesterday, based upon my experience with one phone that I successfully upgraded to CM6-RC1 and another one that failed, I posted a new thread in the G1 General section, which was probably the wrong place for it. Both phones are US TMo G1's purchased within a few days of each other, around December 2009.
During the subsequent 12 hours I read everything I could find about the dreaded "E: Can't find MISC: / (No space left on device)" problem, which I eventually determined was preventing me from proceeding further.
I found many, many examples of people on all types of hardware who were (and many still are) stuck with a hosed-up misc with no idea how to proceed. This was somewhat alarming to me.
I found a few people who were apparently able to fix it by simply doing a flash_image of a misc.img copied from elsewhere. I found a few who seemed to have fixed it with dd. I found others who went through various combinations of installing other things until the problem mysteriously vanished. I found great info about what the misc partition is and how it's used.
What I did not find is:
(a) any clear explanation of how it gets hosed in the first place,
(b) any clear explanation of how to troubleshoot it,
and most importantly (c) any clear explanation of ways to fix it.
This thread is a request for an expert to step in and fill those gaps. Maybe if we can get some "misc lore" in a single place, other people who encounter the problem won't be left hanging.
So first the back story:
Two days ago I decided to install CM6-RC1 on my own G1. It went very smoothly. I was already on Cupcake, so I formatted the card, downgraded back to RC29, I installed Cupcake, formatted again from the phone, used flashrec to install RA 1.7 (which is amazing, by the way; I may be a n00b to phone-guts but that is already apparent), verified the radio version, installed DangerSPL, installed CM6-RC1, and installed the Google Apps. Flawless process.
Loved it. CM6 is great. So the next morning I had my wife leave her phone at home with me. I had seen a thread which led me to believe that the card didn't necessarily have to be formatted twice. I was under the impression I could format it once and drop all the files out there -- only Cupcake needed to be named update.zip for the process outlined above.
So I connected her phone to my laptop, reformatted to FAT32 over USB from Win7, copied all 211 MB of files over, disconnected and went into flashboot. The RC29 downgrade worked fine. I restarted and logged in just to be sure RC29 was on there. I powered off and restarted in recovery mode -- and the misc problem was already there.
In the stock /!\ recovery screen, ALT+L showed the misc error. I couldn't remember if I had seen that previously (having only done this once before), so I hit ALT+S and hoped for the best. The progress bar went about halfway then bombed on an assert in line 4. And that's as far as I got updating my wife's phone: in theory my story could stop here, but being a lifelong geek-type, I decided to forge ahead. I didn't yet know the importance of misc or even recognize it as my main problem, so bear with me.
I rebooted and rooted via telnet and used flashrec to install RA, and tried installing Cupcake that way. I get a different error from RA: No signature, verification failed. I thought I might have a bad file, somehow, despite having used the same update.zip that went into my G1 just fine, so I downloaded it again from megaupload. Then I downloaded the other one named signed-kila-ota. Then I did a file compare and confirmed they're identical. That won't load through RA. Not sure what's up with that.
But after thinking about it and doing more reading, I concluded I probably didn't need Cupcake for CM6-RC1, I just needed the correct radio image to support DangerSPL. So I grabbed the G1 2.22.23 radio image and tried installing that through RA. It extracts and installs ok, then dumps the Can't read Misc error, then tells me to reboot to complete. So I reboot -- and it goes back into the running OS, of course. And then the light goes on, since I did clearly remember on my own G1 it went back into RA, not into Android.
More digging uncovers the radio/SPL thread that explains how misc is used to control reboots, and I finally clearly realize that misc is my problem. (Actually I still don't know why Cupcake won't load from RA, but I still suspect if I can just load the right radio image, it shouldn't matter.)
During the following six hours I have tried a huge variety of things to fix misc, primarily working through an adb connection.
First I tried making a nandroid backup from my working G1. Took me awhile to figure out I had to do it from the command line to force it to backup misc, then I wasted time trying to get the command line to restore that backup, then I finally made another backup on the non-working G1 and copied the "good" misc over -- and still couldn't get it to restore (kept telling me something about being the current version, which I interpreted to mean it wasn't restoring because it thought the backup already matched the live filesystem).
Again, not knowing much about *nix, at this point I was convinced misc was simply dead and gone. I know what a disk partition is, but I didn't see misc (or the others like recovery) in parted, so I don't think I even understand what it means to say misc is a partition. But I didn't see it anywhere, so I thought it had been erased or overwritten or something along those lines.
Then I ran across a thread in which someone suggested doing a "cat /proc/mtd" which yielded the following:
Code:
dev: size erasesize name
mtd0: 00040000 00020000 "misc"
mtd1: 00500000 00020000 "recovery"
mtd2: 00280000 00020000 "boot"
mtd3: 04380000 00020000 "system"
mtd4: 04380000 00020000 "cache"
mtd5: 04ac0000 00020000 "userdata"
I don't know what it means, but at least I see the system still knows something about misc.
Someone else asked for "dump_image misc /dev/zero" for diagnostic purposes, which yields:
Code:
mtd: ECC errors (0 soft, 1 hard) at 0x00000000
mtd: ECC errors (0 soft, 1 hard) at 0x00020000
Someone suggested "cat /dev/zero > /dev/mtd/mtd0" which results in the error message "cat: write error: No space left on device".
I tried copying misc.img out of the backup folder to the sdcard root and doing "flash_image misc /sdcard/misc.img" and was rewarded with the following lines which I can't interpret, although they're clearly related to the output shown above (I assume flash_image is probably a script or something, which is just doing those same steps internally?):
Code:
mtd: ECC errors (0 soft, 1 hard) at 0x00000000
mtd: ECC errors (0 soft, 1 hard) at 0x00020000
mtd: erase failure at 0x00000000 (I/O error)
mtd: erase failure at 0x00000000 (I/O error)
mtd: skipping write block at 0x00000000
error writing misc: No space left on device
I ran across another thread which suggested the command "dd if=/sdcard/misc.img of=/dev/block/mtd0"... that produced this initially encouraging-looking output, though I don't know what it means and it didn't fix misc:
Code:
512+0 records in
512+0 records out
I also saw a few steps and suggestions relating to fastboot. I didn't try any of these since the only instructions I could find for setting up fastboot (in that stickied noob thread) requires a version 2 radio image, which I can't install because misc is fried.
So, in short, searching xda and the Internet in general hasn't helped much, except perhaps to better prepare me to follow somebody else's instructions . In reality I have gone through several different sets of instructions multiple times and tried a variety of other things, but it always comes back to not being able to complete a radio image installation because of that problem with misc.
I'm willing to try just about anything... and I know there are quite a few others out there with a misc problem who can't seem to make any progress or get any input, so hopefully my exhaustive description of how I got here and what I've tried already will be useful to one of the local experts.
I know that ECC refers to the error correction checksum used to detect memory errors... but I find it awfully suspicious that the two supposed ECC errors fall on the very first and last slots on the misc range -- particularly since everybody else with this problem who posts the results of attempts to troubleshoot it or fix it reports exactly the same thing.
In other words, I assume the error message is wrong. This is pretty much the only reason I don't just conclude that the memory is actually hosed and go shopping for a new phone.
Oh, and... bump.
You are certainly telling the truth about it being quite long. That fact does, unfortunately, make it somewhat difficult to read.
I assume that you've seen a few of ezterry's and/or my own posts about the partitions, which is probably where you saw the info on the misc partition.
In any case, the misc partition isn't a "filesystem" partition as you are familiar with. It is actually just a simple data structure. In fact, only the system, cache, and userdata partitions are actually filesystem partitions, and the cache partition is only a filesystem partition part of the time -- during radio and spl updates, it also is used as a simple data structure with a header field and a payload field. That, along with the misc partition, instructs the SPL to perform a radio or spl update.
Now there is a possibility that it may be possible to salvage the device without a working misc partition. Specifically, the requirement is that you get yourself a high-engineering SPL (one with the ability to fastboot a radio image -- note: it is FAST boot, not flashboot).
One important thing to note that might make things easier is that an error "finding" the misc partition *might not imply a failed misc partition*. It could possibly be a failed CACHE partition. Have you tried FORMATTING your cache partition?
In any case, you are no doubt really wondering about my statement that you might be able to update the SPL without the use of a misc partition.... Read THIS thread and you will see how the partition tables are defined and how they can be overridden. This suggests a way that you can actually DEFINE the SPL partition to the linux kernel, which in turn, should allow you to flash_image an SPL update. What you need to do is determine the starting offset and length of the SPL partition, and define it along with the rest of the partitions on the kernel command line. Once this is done, you should be able to fastboot flash a radio update to the device.
Note: Having just done an RC29 NBH file, there is PRECISELY ONE high-engineering SPL that you can install to the device safely.... 1.33.2003 (ending with a THREE -- very important, a 5 is a brick when combined with an rc29's radio).
Also note: I don't take any responsibility if you fry it completely trying this idiotic procedure without a jtag standing by. It is quite risky. I suggest it because it may be your best chance of getting through this.
Note: fastboot does NOT require a 2.x radio image. Fastboot requires an engineering SPL, which for the same reason, you can't install.
Now as for the location of the read/write errors.... you think that it is suspicious that they occur at the first and last slot of the memory range...
Well this is not unexpected since there are only two slots. Each of 128 kB. The first at 0 offset wrt the start, the second at 20000 offset wrt the start. The ECC error itself says that each of the two blocks has failed whatever operation it was trying to perform.
I suggest that your first step might be to try again writing the RC29 NBH file.
Thank you for the explanations and all the details.
I have actually reloaded RC29 quite a few times. I followed the directions from scratch a couple times in case I had gotten something wrong (of course, this was easy to do since I get stuck pretty early in the process).
I'll try formatting CACHE and I'll take a look at using the SPL you reference and report back later.
I really appreciate the assistance.
Ah, just realized that when you do "Wipe cache" from RA recovery, formatting cache is the second step. Since that is immediately followed by another "Can't read MISC" error message, I guess formatting doesn't fix my misc issue.
In this paragraph:
In any case, you are no doubt really wondering about my statement that you might be able to update the SPL without the use of a misc partition.... Read THIS thread and you will see how the partition tables are defined and how they can be overridden.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your "THIS" didn't link to anything. I'll go search for what you're referring to, since this would appear to be my only remaining solution. No JTAG handy, but if someone of your experience thinks this is probably my last-ditch option, I don't have much to lose anyway, right? I'll take it slowly.
Edit: I think this is it? forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=704560 Pretty clever... crazy and dangerous, sure, but what the hell, it's just a phone, lol...
Again, thanks for taking the time to help out.
MV10 said:
Ah, just realized that when you do "Wipe cache" from RA recovery, formatting cache is the second step. Since that is immediately followed by another "Can't read MISC" error message, I guess formatting doesn't fix my misc issue.
In this paragraph:
Your "THIS" didn't link to anything. I'll go search for what you're referring to, since this would appear to be my only remaining solution. No JTAG handy, but if someone of your experience thinks this is probably my last-ditch option, I don't have much to lose anyway, right? I'll take it slowly.
Edit: I think this is it? forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=704560 Pretty clever... crazy and dangerous, sure, but what the hell, it's just a phone, lol...
Again, thanks for taking the time to help out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before re-writing partitions find a recovery with 'erase_image' (I hear tell clockwork has it) install and try:
erase_image misc
then
flash_image misc <misc.img>
where misc.img is an old nandroid backup from a phone of the same region as your own (least its preferable its the same region your CID is in the structure)
It may correct the issue... if not we can try to flash an engineering SPL via flash_image..
I feel this is very safe in theory (as we don't have to worry about boot mode 3.. thus if a valid SPL is flashed you won't completely brick).. However we have no safeguards at this point in time so be careful that you really understand what is going on.. else you will write garbage to the SPL, and there is no helping that w/o JTAG.
(btw.. the SPL .. even the full engineering ones like 1.33.2003 and 1.33.2005 wont actually let you erase misc.. but will let you flash it)
Thank you, I'll try it later today.
Not that it's relevant to getting me fixed, probably, but no idea how/why this problem crops up? Or is it more a case of an error that can have multiple causes? I found it interesting that so many people were reporting it across the various Android forums, and there seemed to be no attempt to explain it. That kind of thing always makes me curious, particularly in an environment like this -- a room full of curious "dig in and figure it out" personalities...
If it ever happened to me, I would certainly try to figure it out, however this is really difficult since it has never happened to me. I don't think that it is anywhere near as common as you think.
What I believe about the situation at the moment is that it is *probably* a failure somewhere else along the line that simply has this SIDE EFFECT.
ezterry: Do you remember which memory address ranges are written by an nbh file? I recall that the nbh file has divisions for the different partitions, so I suspect that it may not write *everything*. Maybe misc and/or cache are not written?
Note: I have seen plenty of instances of the cache partition getting borked and having weird side-effect. The problem with the cache partition and why IT gets into weird states is that it is a dual-purpose partition -- sometimes a yaffs2 filesystem, sometimes a simple data structure, so if it gets into the data structure mode and something tries to use it as a filesystem, you end up with some interesting side-effects.
lbcoder said:
ezterry: Do you remember which memory address ranges are written by an nbh file? I recall that the nbh file has divisions for the different partitions, so I suspect that it may not write *everything*. Maybe misc and/or cache are not written?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The nbh is just a custom archive the header has 3 arrays of 32bit indicating the following for each partition included
> Partition type (this determines the partition via some mapping to flash radio,hboot,misc,cache,recovery,boot,system,splash1,diag)
> Partition offset from start of the nbh file (signature removed if included)
> size of image
The diagnostic nbh only has the fake 'diag' image.. however most others in the wild seem to have radio, hboot, splash1, recovery, system, cache, userdata...
I don't think I've seen one with misc.
Certainly none of my current collection have it. I Wonder if they allow it?
Clockwork's "erase_image misc" returns an error:
mtd: erase failure at 0x00000000
I also tried wiping and formatting the cache again, on the off chance that maybe clockwork did something differently. Nothing new to report there.
As for this kernel partition approach, do I correctly understand that I would be telling the kernel to create a new partition name mapped to a range which precedes misc where the SPL is located? I assume I can derive the size from an img of the stock SPL of the same version. Any tips on how I can figure out where it starts? (Apologies if it's in that thread Ibcoder referenced, I haven't finished reading it yet.)
Or am I thinking about this completely wrong?
Search for my post with the kernel command line with hboot replacing userdata.. it deliberately is not step by step but has the info needed.
On a somewhat peripherally-related note, I see in this post in the De-bricking thread:
forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7072492&postcount=195
Ibcoder writes: 3) This person goes to boot to the recovery by issuing a "reboot recovery", which sets the command field of the MISC partition to boot-recovery and reboots.
Earlier I had thought about asking whether "reboot recovery" writes to MISC, since I issued that command from the RA console yesterday and to my surprise it worked. I figured I must have misunderstood something and maybe reboot recovery used some mechanism other than writing to MISC, but now I've run across the comment above.
Wouldn't that boot mode flag be the same thing recovery should use to finish installing a radio image?
ezterry, is this the post you're referring to?
forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7064255&postcount=187
MV10 said:
On a somewhat peripherally-related note, I see in this post in the De-bricking thread:
forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7072492&postcount=195
Ibcoder writes: 3) This person goes to boot to the recovery by issuing a "reboot recovery", which sets the command field of the MISC partition to boot-recovery and reboots.
Earlier I had thought about asking whether "reboot recovery" writes to MISC, since I issued that command from the RA console yesterday and to my surprise it worked. I figured I must have misunderstood something and maybe reboot recovery used some mechanism other than writing to MISC, but now I've run across the comment above.
Wouldn't that boot mode flag be the same thing recovery should use to finish installing a radio image?
ezterry, is this the post you're referring to?
forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7064255&postcount=187
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Suggesting, of course, that the misc partition itself is actually quite fine, but whatever subsystems responsible for screwing up when it screws up for you are in some other way broken.... which is not inconsistent with the theories I have presented above. Specifically, I am still quite concerned about your cache partition being somehow defective since it is known for having weird side-effects.
What you may possibly be able to do is hack the reboot command into "reboot flash-hboot"... be ***absolutely certain*** that you get your cache partition set up correctly and fully verified before you do this though, otherwise you WILL need jtag to fix it.
Later I wondered whether reboot had options to specify the flashing modes. I take it from your response that it does not. Given my meager relevant knowledge, significant hand-holding would probably be required to pull that one off!
Another oddity I have noticed: my own G1 shows a device ID of HT91CGZ02056 (through something like "adb devices" for example)... but my wife's G1 (with the MISC issue, or whatever it is) just returns a string of zeros: 000000000000. First noticed that in the nandroid backup directory name.
Not sure if that tells anyone anything useful or interesting, but it sure seems weird.
MV10 said:
Another oddity I have noticed: my own G1 shows a device ID of HT91CGZ02056 (through something like "adb devices" for example)... but my wife's G1 (with the MISC issue, or whatever it is) just returns a string of zeros: 000000000000. First noticed that in the nandroid backup directory name.
Not sure if that tells anyone anything useful or interesting, but it sure seems weird.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It could mean that there is a serious defect.... or it could be the same glitch that is causing you problems with misc. Remember that the device ID is stored within the same chip as the misc partition, just at a non-writeable address.
Ha, interesting, I didn't know there was any sort of relationship there. Very interesting.
Well, at this point my wife is freaking out without a phone so I'm just buying her a Galaxy S (yeah I know, Samsung... but frickin' T-Mo doesn't have anything else particularly compelling).
I'm sort of interested in what's wrong with her G1 and I have an unhealthy urge to keep fiddling with it, but honestly I can't justify spending much more time on it right now, too many other things going on in my non-phone-based life.
That means I have a thoroughly unexciting RC29 G1. I assume OTA updates aren't likely to work either (assuming they're still sent out). If either you or ezterry would have any interest in this device (maybe some questions about what went wrong since you haven't seen a MISC failure?), shoot me a PM, I'll see about shipping it off to one of you.
Regardless, I can't express how much I appreciate both of your attempts to help a complete stranger, and I look forward to reading about all the other weird and interesting stuff you guys dig up in the future...

[Q] partition SD on Milestone w/parted - SWAP enabling (brainstorming)

Hi!
Last 48h I've been digging forums for an answer. Is it possible to partition SD Card in Milestone using "parted" and THIS guide?
The problem comes with one little thing:
Code:
C:\Users\DrNO>adb shell
Milestone-Recovery:/
# parted /dev/block/mmcblk0
parted /dev/block/mmcblk0
bash: parted: command not found
Milestone-Recovery:/
# exit
After sleepless night I'm richer in knowledge that (probably) parted is not included in AOR (it's 3.3 that I'm using) [as zeppelinrox posted HERE]
OK, 51dusty used CM recovery, I've tried CMR2.5.0.7, with little success. Maybe I've used it the wrong way but hey!... First I had trouble finding it, then tried to install/flash it through "ROM Manager 4.x", ok it said that's done, reboot into recovery > "Error". Then I looked into the package it looked like an "update" to apply in AOR. It worked, but "adb shell" freezes, it unfreezes after closing CMR. wtf... it was 3 a.m.
1. Am I doing something wrong?
2. Is it possible to implement "parted" in AOR
3. Is it possible to use mentioned above guide on Milestone?
The reason is to part SD "the right way" and split it: FAT32+EXT2(3)+SWAP
Please, help
You can't have swap on Milestone.
And... that's the guide that I used as well... I made a step by step post about it... see my Handy Dandy Fixes thread I linked to it in there... I think I called it "The Hard Way" but ended up being fun...
Oh... and it took me a whole weekend to get it right!
ok, i'll try that anyway, also I'll try to "mount" swap using app called "A2SDGUI", it did miracles with ext2 and it has swap initialing capabilities. when I try to punch it, it flashes short text for half a sec, something about not finding suitable partition, if I get it right, it might work...
two additional Qs:
1. call me retarded but where do I find proper "parted"?
2. is there a windows app that can part disk and make not only ext but swap too? currently I don't have any linux system running, I could install one or make live CD but it would be only for one thing only so I think that you can understand my lazyness ;P
DrNO[PL] said:
2. is there a windows app that can part disk and make not only ext but swap too? currently I don't have any linux system running, I could install one or make live CD but it would be only for one thing only so I think that you can understand my lazyness ;P
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.partitionwizard.com/free-partition-manager.html
Guide to using Minitool partition wizard.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/wiki/index.php?title=SD_card_partitioning
DrNO[PL] said:
1. call me retarded but where do I find proper "parted"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=12361294&postcount=842
thank you Sir for those above and more that I've already read around forum search module is not so great as I thought, because it never returned that post withw "parted".
will report soon how's the battle evolving...
Good luck.
ok then...
parted worked, SD8GB splited nicely:
FAT32 7,25GB
EXT3 512MB
SWAP 32GB
that was easy
next thing "apps2ext", reinstalled Darktremor script, restored ext2 backup, worked, mounted FAT, copied backup, reboot, OS did't even noticed any change (except cutting ext2 by a half and upgrading to ext3, in a good way). then swap. first i've tried some apps, like DroidSwap (only FC's), then Swapper2, which found swap partition, but is still limited by the "f" kernel. formating went OK, (un)mounting part. FAILed. then I've started messing arround > in short, bricked soft :] nothing serious, only /system could not mount, thank you nandroid you exist. now I'm back to the point after spliting SD, having Firefox weighting something like 0.8GB in memory with opened tabs about swap vs milestone. after much reading I'll try more serious approach, more digging, lower coding, no apps, console yes, wish me luck.
quick question, people keep saying linux-swap on milestone is not possible, therefore why are you still including it?
I believe it's possible but the commands the set it up / use it are unknown. It doesn't follow the standard "linux way".
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Swap relies on the kernel being compiled with CONFIG_SWAP. Unfortunately for us, Motorola did not enable swap in the kernels they release. Coupled with the kernel verification scheme, we are unable to swap the kernel with one that has CONFIG_SWAP enabled.
If you do a mkswap and swapon on Milestone, you'd get "Not Implemented". So, swap support is not possible. I'd like to be proven wrong though.
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
swap enable = impossible, dude..
If you read some threads at droidforums, alot of guys don't use swap anyway as it kills the sd card quicker.
Compcache is more interesting... you can squeeze more apps in the same amount of free ram via compression.
The debate is that it takes time to uncompress the app from ram when it's recalled but ram is fast and it would be even faster with a V6 under the hood lol
SWAP is impossible, because motorola kernel don't support it. So, as long as we can't compile our own kernel on Motorola Milestone, this will remain impossible.
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App

OMAP4430 boot.rom dump

My purpose is to locate the fastboot system, and I thought that I would start from, well, the start. Boot-up on the OMAP4430 tries many places, one is an on-chip 48kb ROM. I initially tried to read /dev/mem, but no matter what address I tried to read it would say Bad Address, so I had to make a kernel module, in which I dumped the boot ROM to a file... and it worked.
The reversion of the ROM on my bionic is 0x03 0x19
(Please read Ch 27(.4.2.1) of OMAP4430_ES2.x_PUBLIC_TRM_vY.zip )
I am more handy with ia32 assembly, not arm...
So where is fastboot? I can see a few other addresses, but if I try to map some of them, the device will reboot.. The TRM spoke of 0x08000000 for a fast boot XIP but a reboot occurs (I think) ... any ideas where to look next?
After a day of digging around, I was able to find that "fastboot"(0x08000000) address at 0x28C18 (0x28000 is the base address of the boot.rom) ... just helping out anyone else interested in looking into this. I somehow don't think that this is what I am looking for though... but atleast I do know that I am making some headway
Edit: Confirm that I am unable to read even one byte from 0x08000000 .. reboots
Edit2: Polling from the Control Register (0x4A0022C4) returned 0x00000AEF ... which means that
1) This is not a GP(General Purpose) OMAP4430
2) SYS_BOOT[5:0] is b101111 which tells us
a) to use Memory, not Peripheral boot devices
b) 1st boot device is MMC2(1)(perm) (eMMC/eSD = GPMC pins)
c) 2nd= USB-ULPI (external transceiver)
... Does the MMC mean it boots from the onboard 16gb? If so, then this might be easier to trace through than I thought...
Has anyone dumped the entire contents of that memory? or just the known partitions?
Edit3: Reading the TRM more (pg 5240) tells me that SDMMC2 only Raw mode is supported, no file system (FAT12/FAT16/FAT32) support because the purpose of this approach is to avoid the boot time penalty of searching for a file system hierarchy when it is not always necessary.
Edit4: ...and Sure enough, dumping the first 512 bytes of /dev/block/mmcblk1 shows the Bootable signature (0x55AA) at the end (0x01FE)
... I thought I read that it would just try to read in RAW mode, which makes it not want to even have such a thing, but I knew it had all those other partitions, so I figured I might have been wrong there...
A proper dump of this soon enough.. atleast I gave you guys the boot.rom from the actual OMAP4430 that would have been otherwise hard to retreive... I only wasted one day on this, not bad and I learned some ARM ASM
Edit5: Maybe I am getting ahead of myself, it is of type 0x83 ... which is Linux, not any of the FAT FS which the boot.rom supports... ?
Edit6: Well, it has the file it's looking for, not sure if it's a FAT system like it's suppose to be though, and it looks like in a 1MB dump that fastboot is in the 2nd or maybe more, partition... I still want to try to dump this "MLO" bootup file... but i have to learn about FAT fs structure, ugh...
The implications of deep hardware hacking like this make me very excited for what could be possible with the Bionic. It contains some absolutely absurd hardware for a mobile device so the sky's the limit at this point. Fantastic work! I could only dream of being able to comprehend the things that guys like you can.
Also I wonder if this thread would end up getting proper attention in the dev section.
projektorboy said:
The implications of deep hardware hacking like this make me very excited for what could be possible with the Bionic. It contains some absolutely absurd hardware for a mobile device so the sky's the limit at this point. Fantastic work! I could only dream of being able to comprehend the things that guys like you can.
Also I wonder if this thread would end up getting proper attention in the dev section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only wish I could comprehend what he is talking about. I'm glad to see a vested interest is being taken!
Sent from my DROID BIONIC
Thanks so much, Noxz for making the effort to do this!
hey, thanks finally for the responses, a full day after the initial dump and no responses... I think because it's NOT in the dev section... but I can't post a thread there until I have 10 posts... maybe I can get that privilege now, moderators?
The bad part with disassembling is that when it computes an jump in code(in ARM it's called a branch) and doesn't give a specific address, it makes finding that code very hard.. I found the text "MLO", the bootable file, in the boot.rom but nothing of the code I know referenced it yet, unfortunate because that partition is not a standard FAT fs and thus is taking a while to read, but if I did have the disassemble of the ROM code where it looks for that, or even just the file search, then I could easily see what it is reading...
Obviously knowing that fastboot and such is in the second or third partition is quite a step forward, but I need to dump this MLO file so we can read from start to finish...
I'll keep everyone posted
So this partition isn't a correct FAT fs... I don't know if being identified as a Linux partition means anything and I'm just not reading into it right, but I am having some time trying to look into these files, you can easily see the MLO file, a KEYS file, and a PRIMAPP file right at the start, or I should say the file name, but there isn't much information on where they are mapped, etc etc...
Maybe partition2 will be better? It's also identified as a Linux partition
I still have a few days to waste...
Sorry to ask dumb. But what exactly does this benefit me when flashing it?
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
The current fastboot does not have several commands that is in the original source... but really, I am just interested in the entire boot procedure.. there's a few things I might like to change... The good news is because everything but the boot.rom resides on the eSD, that means we should be able to write to it very easily, so we can change quite a bit
Noxz, I am along with these guys in I would understand more if I was just dropped in the middle of Ghana :\ but I would like you to know that you have given me my 1024th item on my 'to research' list. So once I get bored with what I'm doing now, I am going to try to learn a little bit about ARM and OMAP
Hah, I understand...
I've done a bit of x86 ASM and BIOS disassembly before.. so I figured I might as well peek into this and see what is being hidden and such...
I am seeking help right now... If you know anything about the FAT filesystem... you can start by doing "dd if=/dev/block/mmcblk1p1 of=/mnt/sdcard-ext/partition1"
.. It obviously has that MLO bootup file in it as mentioned in the OMAP4430 TRM but I can't seem to trace what cluster it might be in... I have to assume that it is in fact a FAT fs... but it doesnt seem to follow any of the structures/formats I've been reading... ???
The boot rom you've dumped is the ti omap itself; the only real purpose of that is to bootstrap the bootloader. You are correct in that it's not a GP; none of the Motorola phones are -- this boot rom is what verifies the signature of the bootloader.
http://www.droid-developers.org/wiki/Booting_chain
While not exact, the above diagram will give you an overview of the layout used by Motorola phone. The short version is boot rom -> mbmloader -> mbm -> lbl -> kernel, where mbmloader is the Motorola terminology for the MLO or X-LOADER referenced in the TRM. mbm is the bootloader (motorola boot manager) and controls all actions henceforth, including fastboot (which replaced an older sbf protocol).
The CDT acts as a partition table and lists the layout of the device, including marking where the signatures are located and how often they're checked.
http://blog.opticaldelusion.org/2011/10/bionic-development-notes.html
Sorry for late answer.
Here you can find example of reversing OMAP 3430 bootrom http://hg.droid-developers.org/reverse_engineering/src/b8b881184b5f/asm
As mentioned before droid-developers wiki contain a lot of info about bootrom.
Here you can find info about bootrom itself http://www.droid-developers.org/wiki/Application_Processor_Boot_ROM
Here you can find info about security model in omap http://www.droid-developers.org/wiki/Security http://www.droid-developers.org/wiki/Secure_Services
Here you can find info about my project - emulation of early OMAP booting (including bootrom debugging) http://www.droid-developers.org/wiki/QEMU

HD PLus Partition Table restoration

I've tried diving through google and the site looking for a solution to this. Between noise,missed hits, and age, I am not having any luck finding out if this is solvable.
I made the mistake last year of trying the fstrim fix on a model that was clearly a bad idea on - funny how I found all the "DON'T!" articles a year later despite being from before my search. . *ah well* I toyed with the fixes at the time but never had much luck and set it aside for a while.
Started looking again last night and was able to at least determine the Nook isn't dead. CWM comes up, I can hit it with ADB. fdisk doesn't seem to see anything ( which I'm guessing is expected but I'm unsure why ) so I'm uncertain how to restore. the partition tables.
I have an identical model I can clone if there are any sane processes for doing such, but i've been unable to ask search engines the right questions.
Can someone clarify if this is possible or if I'm "stuck" running off of an sd card from now on?
Thanks.
dbolack said:
I've tried diving through google and the site looking for a solution to this. Between noise,missed hits, and age, I am not having any luck finding out if this is solvable.
I made the mistake last year of trying the fstrim fix on a model that was clearly a bad idea on - funny how I found all the "DON'T!" articles a year later despite being from before my search. . *ah well* I toyed with the fixes at the time but never had much luck and set it aside for a while.
Started looking again last night and was able to at least determine the Nook isn't dead. CWM comes up, I can hit it with ADB. fdisk doesn't seem to see anything ( which I'm guessing is expected but I'm unsure why ) so I'm uncertain how to restore. the partition tables.
I have an identical model I can clone if there are any sane processes for doing such, but i've been unable to ask search engines the right questions.
Can someone clarify if this is possible or if I'm "stuck" running off of an sd card from now on?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, the HD/HD+ does not use a DOS based partition table so fdisk will not work. It has a different system, I think GPT, but not sure it is the right name.
But if you look at my HD+ stock tip thread linked in my signature, you will see I have an article about partition structure there. If you use TWRP on SD it has a terminal emulator that will let you run the routines for backing up and restoring the partitions.
But if you truly messed up with the fstrim fix your device has become read only and it is not fixable.
Sent from my SM-T707V using XDA Premium HD app
leapinlar said:
First, the HD/HD+ does not use a DOS based partition table so fdisk will not work. It has a different system, I think GPT, but not sure it is the right name.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the provided, linuxy fdisk on the CWM image when I did a adb shell, not the host OS, which also isn't dos. Unless it's behaving in a way different than expected, it should detect the block devices even if it does not understand the partitioning table. Newer implementations of fdisk do speak gpt, but I rather doubt that's on the CWM image. I believe you are correct that it is a gpt table. I'll have to verify against my other device.
leapinlar said:
But if you look at my HD+ stock tip thread linked in my signature, you will see I have an article about partition structure there. If you use TWRP on SD it has a terminal emulator that will let you run the routines for backing up and restoring the partitions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have to give that a whirl. I hadn't spotted that particular bit.
leapinlar said:
But if you truly messed up with the fstrim fix your device has become read only and it is not fixable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure. If I run blkid I do see that the two partitions that CWM has a wipe/format seem to have file systems on them, but they are the only ones detected. This makes me think the partitions are borked in some very creative way and I either can't see the table to fix it with the tools I'm using or the tools I need aren't present on my image.
dbolack said:
I've tried diving through google and the site looking for a solution to this. Between noise,missed hits, and age, I am not having any luck finding out if this is solvable.
I made the mistake last year of trying the fstrim fix on a model that was clearly a bad idea on ...
...
Can someone clarify if this is possible or if I'm "stuck" running off of an sd card from now on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your EMMC is bricked due to "having run fstrim on a faulty EMMC chip", your only option is to run on SD a special "no-emmc" CM ROM such as the one posted at https://iamafanof.wordpress.com/201...-4-4-4-for-bricked-no-emmc-nook-hd-04nov2014/.
digixmax said:
If your EMMC is bricked due to "having run fstrim on a faulty EMMC chip", your only option is to run on SD a special "no-emmc" CM ROM such as the one posted at....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interestingly, using the link to the buggy EMMC Page at Cynogen ( sorry, newb can't link ) mine is not on the list of known offenders.

Categories

Resources