Installed Linpack benchmark program, and im getting 13's running Froyo 2.2 with lagfix (not overclocked).My friends HTC EVO getting 33's. I was wondering if I'm running slow on my phone, or if its normal, and what others are getting?
I get about 17 running Assonance 3.1 with clock set to 1000mhz, but I get 55.4 FPS in NeoCore
54.8 in NeoCore here
Related
Ive gone through just about every Froyo ROM, and the best results that Ive come across has been with Rodriguez 1.8 and pershoot's 1.113 OC kernel.
I was getting over 45 mflops on linpack
and over 1600 on quadrant standard
Then I tried moving around alot and ive been playing with Evil's 1.228 OC kernel, which for some reason is showing less performance benchmarking wise
im getting about 42 mplofs on linpack
and a little over 1500 on quadrant standard
So what has everyone else found as a fast setup? (again, benchmark wise)
With "stock" Froyo (first version released by Paul) I could get 40.7Mflops with Lin and 1425 with Quad. Im happy with the original combo of stock kernel and stock ROM for now.
Coming over from fascinate forums and just wondering how the benchmarks test change when we actually get some froyo. I know they don't matter but it helps show the overall boost in performance so anybody with linpack or quadrant if u don't care please post ur results. Thanks n advance. Don't flame me, this will give u cappy users a chance to brag
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Quadrant scores stay pretty close to the same, mid 900's to low 1000's, linpack clocks in between 13.5 and 15
As has been mentioned in many other threads, Quadrant scores are biased toward Snapdragon processors.
These benchmarks really don't mean anything from one phone to another, but within the same phone model it does give an idea of improvement..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
1842 Quadrant Score after OCLF on Froyo which is great compared to 900 before the fix
This is with RyanZA’s EXT2 Lagfix.
Full Quadrant: 1867 (Saw 67 FPS at one point) This is substantially lower than the 2.1 EXT4 Lagfix, but still twice as high as the stock score of 957. I know Quadrant really doesn’t mean anything.
Benchmark PI: 1445 MS
Linpak:
MFLOPS: 13.809
Time: 6.07 Seconds
Norm Res: 5.68
Precision: 2.22044
The "Billabond1 real life use" benchmark shows performance to be as good or better than 2.1. I went from cognition 2.1 w/ voodoo lagfix to cognition 2.2 w/ oclf. I would say that the performance is about the same, good, and the features in 2.2 make it totally worth the update.
On a fresh install of 2.2 I got 995 on my quadrant score.
When I finished rooting and putting on RyanZA's OCLF, my quadrant went up to 2105.
Never did a linpack
Hi all.
I was running 2.1 Eclair just a few hours ago and was getting constant scores of 2.2K+ on Quadrant with the OCLF. I'm now running a rooted 2.2 Froyo with the same OCLF and scoring 1846. I can barely see a loss of performance... Does anyone know why this is?
Thanks in advance.
Because Quadrant is a SYNTHETIC BENCHMARK! It only tests a single specific workload
I was also under the impression that OCLF didn't work on Froyo unless you first ran the Z4 app and then the OCLF. I also agree though that Quadrant isn't that useful. The best test is whether you're happy with the speed of the phone. I'd be happy with it if it responds to my touch without a pause of a second or more.
Quadrant means nothing really, anyone can get 1k in there and outperform a 2.6k score.
is there a way to get higher quadrant scores (faster lagfix)? I'm scoring around 1250 right now... Any way to get 2000+ with cognition?
Thanks in advance!
Rohan
Is your phone running fast? Do you have a lag? Quadrant scores are generally useless and inaccurate. That said if you want really high quadrant scores flash either perception or assonance, and tweak the ulf settings and overclock to the highest settings. Your phone will likely freeze up constantly but your quadrant scores will be amazing
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
I'm just surprised when running cm7 on my nexus one. It felt snappy. But when I put in quadrant, it actually came out in 3rd place when running 998 Max and 245 min. So I overclocked both to 1113 mhz, and the score wasnt impresive either: 1424...which is only a tad bit better than n1 on 2.2. Now does this have to do with the app itself or the device?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA App
Thread moved to Q&A, since this is a question.
FWIW, on my Nexus S, my score (and overall 3d performance) went down considerably between 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 ROMs (e.g. CyanogenMod 7 RC1 and RC2). I used to get ~4000 in Quadrant at 1.4 GHz, whereas now I only get around 3300. The part most telling for me was that in the first 3D test, I used to be locked at 65 fps for the majority of the test. Now I get around 2/3 that. Similarly Smartbench 2010 and 2011 show major declines as well. Not quite as pronounced, but noticeable nonetheless. My previous recorded score was 1635/3669 at 1.4 GHz, and now I get 1551/3251.
On the Nexus S, I know that this decrease in performance is due to the different framebuffer driver in 2.3.3, which now supposedly calibrates the screen to not be as over-saturated and raises the gamma to 2.2 from 1.8. I don't know if this is applicable to the Nexus One.
There is definitely a decrease because I used to have up to 1800 in quadrant when running at 1.113 ghz. But the weird thing is the phone still felt really snappy when I set it to 998 mhz. In contrast, I experienced random lags on cm6 at 1032 mhz. Weird!
Sent from my Xoom using XDA App