What are your JPU Quadrant scores? - Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

When i first flashed the rom i got 1200 repeatedly.
Rebooted installed a few ups, updated some and now i just about hit 1100.

yeah i was getting 1250 when i first got it
after about 150 apps including fonts and live wallpapers
i get 1180-1160

Just a reminder that quadrant actually says very little about the performance of your device..

I'm getting 1400 to almost 1600. But I'm also using darky's rom so I don't know if you want to count that or not

1200 with no lagfix, 1500 with voodoo. phone is running sweet at the moment, much better than when it was scoring 2300 on jp7. Have been running it alternating lagfix on and off, cant notice any real difference
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Running Darky's 5.2 rom.

1595 on Doc's v.4.0 with Voodoo lagfix oc1.2Ghz!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

Whats the maximum ever anyone got ? I saw the dhd is getting 3000 how reliable is this?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

Quadrant scores should only really be treated as a bit of fun, a mate of mine with the hd oc his and got 2932, but the phone was unstable and actually ran slower at that speed then it did stock. As I said earlier my phone scores a consistent 1200 without a lagfix and it is definitely running the best it ever has. I had it overclocked to 1.2 before with oclf and it was scoring 2300-2400, the phone seemed fast but not as smooth and stable as what it does now with jpu installed

nagrom78 said:
Quadrant scores should only really be treated as a bit of fun, a mate of mine with the hd oc his and got 2932, but the phone was unstable and actually ran slower at that speed then it did stock. As I said earlier my phone scores a consistent 1200 without a lagfix and it is definitely running the best it ever has. I had it overclocked to 1.2 before with oclf and it was scoring 2300-2400, the phone seemed fast but not as smooth and stable as what it does now with jpu installed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmmm curious and curiouser lol will I regret getting the dhd over the sgs?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

calexus1182 said:
will I regret getting the dhd over the sgs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

superchango said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok.....that, kinda scared me...
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

I dont get whats going on, now when i try it im getting around 1200 again, seems like the IO score is fluctuating quite a bit!

As a comparison i get 1877
On JP5 using Z4Root and OCLF.
jje

Related

[Q] Overclocking the Galaxy

Now that the kernel source is available, won't we be able to overclock our mobiles?
Guess i got a little bit envious with all the overclocking that has being going on with other phones.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
A bit of using search never really hurt anyone before...
So is it possible yet.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Been possible for last 3months. Just find a kernel with oc support and get setcpu. Frankly its not worth it as setcpu is a piece of **** app that make your system unstable. As other poster said. Do a damn search
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
ickyboo said:
Been possible for last 3months. Just find a kernel with oc support and get setcpu. Frankly its not worth it as setcpu is a piece of **** app that make your system unstable. As other poster said. Do a damn search
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But for froyo? Maybe is asking for it.
maybe someone with the tallents could have a look into this OC method they use for droid x and milestone using a kernel module, this would enable us to overclock any froyo kernel.
http://androidforums.com/droid-2-al...d-2-overclock-kernel-module-instructions.html
It would be nice to have it in the kernel. 100 to 1200 that the system controlling like it already do. No setcpu crap.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
ickyboo said:
Been possible for last 3months. Just find a kernel with oc support and get setcpu. Frankly its not worth it as setcpu is a piece of **** app that make your system unstable. As other poster said. Do a damn search
Yes for froyo and don't be so damn rude Muppet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also setcpu is not to blame for the problems, as it runs just well on galaxy i7500 for overclocking. i´m not sure what the problem wit it is on SGS, but i´m pretty its not setcpu´s fault
FadeFx said:
also setcpu is not to blame for the problems, as it runs just well on galaxy i7500 for overclocking. i´m not sure what the problem wit it is on SGS, but i´m pretty its not setcpu´s fault
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is that SGS doesn't like different CPU governors! It will only work if you don't touch the governor settings! At least that is what I have found to work in the Eclair builds!
FadeFx said:
also setcpu is not to blame for the problems, as it runs just well on galaxy i7500 for overclocking. i´m not sure what the problem wit it is on SGS, but i´m pretty its not setcpu´s fault
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems ignorance is bliss for some of our fellow xda folks. SetCPU is not even needed for those oc kernels unless you want to change scaling from default schema. It really don't contribute to the unstablity, just that the kernels seemed inefficient.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
OrionBG said:
The problem is that SGS doesn't like different CPU governors! It will only work if you don't touch the governor settings! At least that is what I have found to work in the Eclair builds!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. Don't install SetCPU and the kernel is reasonably stable, but crashes miserably when running cup intensive apps. We have to work harder developing a kernel which works well for our hardware.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Prankey said:
I agree. Don't install SetCPU and the kernel is reasonably stable, but crashes miserably when running cup intensive apps. We have to work harder developing a kernel which works well for our hardware.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel was very much stable. It is just that hummingbird is bad for overclocking. Not all phones can be overclocked, sadly.
dupel said:
kernel was very much stable. It is just that hummingbird is bad for overclocking. Not all phones can be overclocked, sadly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can understand what you are suggesting, however why was it still unstable when I tried to disable 1.2GHz or 1.13GHz frequency keeping the original scaling and running at 1GHz or less??
Is that 0.2 bump really noticeable?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
carlocb said:
Is that 0.2 bump really noticeable?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think 20% is noticable difference. Especially when using that crap of a browser we have.
Prankey said:
I can understand what you are suggesting, however why was it still unstable when I tried to disable 1.2GHz or 1.13GHz frequency keeping the original scaling and running at 1GHz or less??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont know which version you used.
1.13 was quite old. All recent versions were 1.2. Anyway, nevermind =)
Yeah, do want a OC'able kernel - the 1.2GHz kernels for Éclair were always stable enough for me if I didn't try to UV it.
Id be open to using a 1.2Ghz OC if its 100% stable and no wake-up bugs and ofcourse should not affect the life of my CPU that much and should not drain my battery more than 10% faster

What lag fixed to score over 2600?

Hi. I just finished OCLF. and the score is 1990. But i heard some one said they can even use lag fix and score benchmark over 2700.so can any 1 tell me which lag fix application to use to achieve such score?
Thanks in advanced .
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Universal lagfix using jfs overkill with oc enabled may give u such a score. But benchmark doesnt really mean anything. Im using advanced voodoo oc v69.2 and i score about 1900 and my phone is snappier than ever. With oclf i had 2100 but my phone was still laggy.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Is it available in the market?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Ethanol .
jje
For the worst scenario can it brick my phone!? Cos i don't have 3 combo buttons work and having problem to fix it..
Regard.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Cos i don't have 3 combo buttons work and having problem to fix it..
Answer = yes but hey overclockers just go out and buy a new one .
A Quadrant score bears no relation to the operation of your phone its an old out of date synthetic benchmark .
jje
I don't know. But after lag fix and benchmark goes from 960 to 1990. I noticed improvement in opening most applications..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Just trust the guy above you. Oclf is outdated
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
overclock to 1.4Ghz and use JFS should give you 2k+
Okay i'll try to learn how to overclock it to 1.4 GHz and use other method since
OCLF is outdated already..
Thanks alots.. will try more...
Aw, jeez ... ePenis much? Quadrant scores are pointless.
Eclair, lagfixed on EXT2 gave me 2400+.
Froyo 2.2.1 doesn't feel any slower and is somewhere around 1200 (wo lagfix).
Okay i'll get my 3 combo works and Flash to 2.2.1 JPY then let's see..
Thanks..

Quadrant now Gingerbread ready.

Quadrant fixed for nexus s and....
I got a score of 1600.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Enjoy!
[10 chars]
**Update** well it wont crash, but its still not optimized for our hardware. :/
WOW 1600!?!
I got a mere 1387.......
why the difference? Im on stock everything if that helps explain it.......
Ok I re-ran it with wiFi on instead of 3G and got 1657. That's more like it.
LOL - I'm now getting 1717, it seems the more I run it the faster it goes........?
I got 1710 on 3g...and 1337 on wifi..!!!
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
I got 1637 on 3G
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Just got 1763 , I'm rooted with superboot, stock rom though. Stock kernel.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
First attempt: 1313
Second attempt: 1578
Third attempt: 1712
No offense to anyone, but I don't think Quadrant is that great of a benchmarking app
I got 3727
↓↓↓ Signature ↓↓↓
What FPS are you gettin on the planet test?
italia0101 said:
What FPS are you gettin on the planet test?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU: 8597
Memory: 2113
I/O: 6776
2D: 404
3D: 746
Yea, but what about the FPS on planet? im gettin like 11 FPS max
italia0101 said:
Yea, but what about the FPS on planet? im gettin like 11 FPS max
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same, but ran neocore and got 55.7, so go figure. FYI, most of these benchmark tests are really designed for the Snapdragons, not the Hummingbird. In actuality, we should be seeing scores similar to or better in Linpack, the 3D scores should be a hell of a lot better in Quadrant. So take these tests with a grain of salt. Back with my Captivate, I mainly used then to make sure Voodoo was working, if the overclock took, etc. But yes, we should be seeing more than 11 fps for sure.
Ah ok, yea i always knew quadrant as meant to be taken with a pinch of salt, but everyone seems to use it as the standard
I got 1394. Everything stock, and on 3G (I didn't realize wifi or 3G mattered).
1394. Good score?
onthecouchagain said:
I got 1394. Everything stock, and on 3G (I didn't realize wifi or 3G mattered).
1394. Good score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say it isn't great. Real world perforamce is what matters but like I said above, these tests aren't measuring the potential of the Hummingbird.
sstang2006 said:
I got 3727
↓↓↓ Signature ↓↓↓
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Another example why Quadrant isn't a good benchmarking tool.
No it's not Gingerbread ready. If it was then the spinning planet would get 56 fps stable, just like it does on the Galaxy S.
Anderdroid said:
No it's not Gingerbread ready. If it was then the spinning planet would get 56 fps stable, just like it does on the Galaxy S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I got.
I just pulled a 2828 on 1. 6ghz kernel
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Hmm I just pulled a 2825 on a new kernel rooted love this thing
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

Quadrant score

Is 1500 a low score for a captivate overclocked to 1.2 ghz? Im running the onix kernel with andromeda3. The phone feels blazing fast and I was expecting a 2000ish score. I really could care less about the quadrant score but I am curious because it seems low.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Nah,ur scores fine.Thats what I usually got from the premium roms with ext4.The highest I.ever got was on stock froyo with oneclicklagfix,just above 2000.But seriously that quadrant score doesnt tell me much,currently running Mosaic lll D and have no laggix enabled so my quadrant is at 1000 but everything seems to be running blazing fast.My most ram needy app Asphalt 6 is performing better then on any other froyo based rom with lagfix so really y would any1 give a shi.... about quadrant, just saying
Sent from my Cappy using XDA App
Thanks man
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

Tegrak overclock setting help needed!!

HI!
I recently flashed the Fasty III rom and I like it, especially with the spb 3d launcher...
BUT it's running SLOW and lagging alot and the battery drain is tough...
I got tegrak overclock premium/ultimate and tried to make it run faster with hopefully less battery drain...
I tried 13000mhz 1275mv core and 1100mv internal but then the phone started getting HOT when i was playing Words with Friends -_-....
I tried other settings but none seem to work that well...
Does someone have a good configuration which will let me rin it fast without the crazy battery drain and over heating?
Thank you!
Samsung Captivate I897
Fasty III KK4 edition v 1.1
Android 2.3.5
Don't OC that high? Lol try 1.2ghz and try uv as much as you can per step.
Sent from my ICS powered Captivate using Tapatalk
Try Voltage Control
easier to set up
Not possible unless he changes to Corn 7.x. And either way he NEEDS to figure out how much UV his phone can take.
Edit: @OP I would bet you're lag is because of the launcher. I used Fasty before and ran decently on 1ghz.
Sent from my ICS powered Captivate using Tapatalk
prbassplayer said:
Not possible unless he changes to Corn 7.x. And either way he NEEDS to figure out how much UV his phone can take.
Edit: @OP I would bet you're lag is because of the launcher. I used Fasty before and ran decently on 1ghz.
Sent from my ICS powered Captivate using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also think that the lag is created by SPB 3D Launcher as that launcher use a lot of ram.
@OP try using a different launcher like GO Launcher and see if you're lagging or not?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Thanks for the advice everyone!
OK first these are the things I've done since the post...
I am now running the corn kernel v7.06... with syscorp(default) tweaks, smartassv2, sio and tegrak disabled ATM...
I have frozen spb thru tibu and am using LP sense pro....which was my original launcher btw...
I have recalibrated the battery and wiped battery stats...
I am still getting lag...most noticeably when a call comes in while using a different app...cant answer the call since it freezes up...oh and hanging with friends seem to lag A LOT for some reason...weird...
My battery Life is atrocious! I am getting like 4 to 5 hours with light use...display is using 79% according to battery mgr ...
Does this sound like I have something wrong in my setup or is this a bad flash of the rom?
thanks for any advice!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

Categories

Resources