Related
With the buildbots not up yet, I've been working on a little project in secret for a while. I call it Cyanobread. My plan here is to make a CM7 that has all of CM 6.1's bells and whistles before the CM7 team does. Some patches I will probably submit, and some will be only for this ROM as they go against the ideas of what Cyanogen wants. I haven't decided yet if I will keep this updated once the buildbots come back. If it divulges from the CM7 project significantly than probably.... otherwise I will just keep this as a mod for a few patches you can add to CM7.
My philosophy behind doing this ROM is the fact that I love CM6 and have used the nightlies as my daily driver and was very dissapointed 7 wasn't up on the buildbots.
Even though this is mostly a CM7Src ROM, please report any bugs here and I will do my best to either report them to the CM Team or fix them myself if I can. Same thing goes for any features you'd like to see added.
My approach to deving is a very collaborative one. Invisiblek, jladronka and DS36 will be helping me with this project. If any other devs would like to help, please shoot me a PM. The more the merrier, I really want to see a nice group project out of this.
Screenshots :Comming Soon
Version 1: Download Coming Soon!
reserved.... I've always wanted to do that
Sounds swell. Can't wait to give it a whirl! Thanks!
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
Im all over it
I'm very interested in this.
You let me know if PSX4droid works and I'll be all over this ROM.
Ruggerxpunk said:
You let me know if PSX4droid works and I'll be all over this ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could also, you know, test it out yourself.
Just saying...
Interesting (but then again, I'm a ROM hua), I'm on board.
I'm also interested in Cyanocomb when it's ready. ;-)
sounds interesting, i'll definitely try it
Looking forward to it.....I know I should not ask, but.....ETA?
lol I dont go by the No ETA rule so long as you dont mind if you're wrong.
well this has been an in work project for a few weeks... finally had a full compile this morning but was missing some apps.... so i decidedd to make clean and do it again... first time my laptop blue screened, then it hibernated because I forgot to plug it in.... I'm thinking within a few hours.
I'm looking forward to this.
Back in my Blackberry days we used to call these Hybrids. Some of the most functional, stable BB OSs were patched together from different OSs or even bits and pieces from different phones.
Of course, some hybrids were the biggest train wrecks also...
I have high hopes for this. Good luck!
Heh, FrankenROM.
sorry for not getting this out tonight... I had a few minor setbacks. Teaser installer video coming in a few minutes. Right now, it is completely stock CM, and you can think of the teaser as a .5 of sorts. v1 will be out tomorrow I promise. Very minor tweaks that I am going to do to start out with.
Excuse my ignorance, whats the point? Isn't CM7 the best of 6 and 7 all rolled into one sprinkled over some Gingerbread?
joe3681 said:
Excuse my ignorance, whats the point? Isn't CM7 the best of 6 and 7 all rolled into one sprinkled over some Gingerbread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ^^ I'm running gridlock's CM 7 latest build and so far, it's got all the mods that CM6.# has, on GB.
What exactly are you planning on adding that it doesn't already have?
n1ghtwish said:
This ^^ I'm running gridlock's CM 7 latest build and so far, it's got all the mods that CM6.# has, on GB.
What exactly are you planning on adding that it doesn't already have?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause I went from Cm6.1 to to 7 up to the latest 32, and there's nothing at all that has made me say "Oh damn, I miss that from CM6". CM7 has TONS more tweaks, and a pretty bad ass music player.
Glad to see I'm not the only one wondering what the point of this is...
when i started this project that wasn't the case. a lot o the goodies in CM6 were missing... I plan to add my own little touch to it and hopefully diverge from the CM project slightly. Video's not going to happen, having some issue with the touchscreen....will look at it in the morning.
hmmm... no issue with the touch screen... but somehow this compiled lacking a keyboard... blah... i was hopeful... oh well... will deal wiith it in the morning
If you guys follow dj-steve on twitter then you will know he got honeycomb to boot on the s7. Great news. But to get it stable we need too have the kernel ported too 2.6.36. And maybe have the touch driver modified if that wasn't addressed in 2.6.36.
If you guys can ask around and see if anyone is willing to help with this you will be that much closer to hc. His twitter is @DMonsterProd follow him. And if you have any further questions regarding what needs to be done ask him through twitter he will respond.
Lets get some honeycomb small little step holding us back atm. Thanks peoples
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrt8qGax91U&feature=youtube_gdata_player
sent from a tower
Hellzya said:
If you guys follow dj-steve on twitter then you will know he got honeycomb to boot on the s7. Great news. But to get it stable we need too have the kernel ported too 2.6.36. And maybe have the touch driver modified if that wasn't addressed in 2.6.36.
If you guys can ask around and see if anyone is willing to help with this you will be that much closer to hc. His twitter is @DMonsterProd follow him. And if you have any further questions regarding what needs to be done ask him through twitter he will respond.
Lets get some honeycomb small little step holding us back atm. Thanks peoples
sent from a tower
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have been trying hard myself , without trying to bugg dj-steve to much lol but its hard since he seems to be the only one willing
Reach out to your phone kernel devs its what I'm going to do. We need to start some kind of bounty to get some interest in porting the kernel.
sent from a tower
well we need to find whoever is basically working on hc ports already but we might need to send another device to someone in the xoom threads
I think pershoot is the man to ask since he is the kernel king in the game imo. The only problem is he can't do much without a device to try it on.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Beta testers my friend pass the word on
sent from a tower
Booted the hc earlier and I must say its awesome. Lack of screen scrolling and such but it looks so good
sent from a tower
Already write to faux123. Lets see!
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Yep folks contact as many users as pos. Throw it out on twitter etc. remember we have a near unbrickable device here so reflashing after a failed kernel attempt is as simple as hitting reset and loading into fastboot. And as hellzya said above the most critical issue preventing me releasing a prealpha build is touch screen driver being a bodgejob and not working properly. So if anyones got c coding skills that could be a place to start. Remember im working on 3 tabs and the ni adam is the base for my hc port which works accross most tegra 2 devices it would appear so updates are coming thick and fast.
Sent from my Dell Streak using Tapatalk
My own Project was already in the works for another TEAM:
http://www.aedesign.cn/bbs/forumdisplay.php?fid=6
DOWNLOAD of THEIR work:
http://u.115.com/file/bh5z76gp#AED_Legend_5.0.0.RC3_exp.zip
good to see
Good to see someone else to make something new for the legend comunity. Keep going!
By the way, what is your ROM base? The video is too blury...
ogo2 said:
Good to see someone else to make something new for the legend comunity. Keep going!
By the way, what is your ROM base? The video is too blury...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say this rom:
http://www.aedesign.cn/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=316&extra=page=1
Looks cool, looking forward to this rom. Gj so far
Sent from my Legend using XDA App
I am glad as well to see someone else step up to the plate. I think this will give the CyanogenMod developers some more motivation to make a stable release.
LiViD said:
I am glad as well to see someone else step up to the place. I think this will give the CyanogenMod developers some more motivation to make a stable release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I know we are idiots. All of our releases have been unstable, full of bugs and missing nearly every feature one could wish for. Please excuse us, but we really can't do any better. The fact that all ROMs that are not based off RUUs are CyanogenMod rip-offs should clearly tell you that we just can't get anything right at all.
Very MIUI like.. Looks pretty much like my new Desire... Great job seeing similar running on the Legend..
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA Premium App
great job!
LiViD said:
I am glad as well to see someone else step up to the plate. I think this will give the CyanogenMod developers some more motivation to make a stable release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i suggust u say sorry for your arrogance to the CyanogenMod tea
btw awsome work!
dilip007 said:
i suggust u say sorry for your arrogance to the CyanogenMod tea
btw awsome work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You guys don't pay attention to the experimental thread do you? Seriously, over 160 attempts at a nightly build and still nothing that performs up to par with ogo2's 2.3.3 Sense UI ROM. Sure his is lacking WiFi AP functionality, but I can live with that.
I love how you call everyone elses' ROM a rip-off of a CM ROM. Get a life guys, no one would attempt to use your builds unless said person was extremely lazy.
LiViD said:
You guys don't pay attention to the experimental thread do you? Seriously, over 160 attempts at a nightly build and still nothing that performs up to par with ogo2's 2.3.3 Sense UI ROM. Sure his is lacking WiFi AP functionality, but I can live with that.
I love how you call everyone elses' ROM a rip-off of a CM ROM. Get a life guys, no one would attempt to use your builds unless said person was extremely lazy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn.. Where have you lived your life? 2 versions of stable ROMS is what we have.. original from HTC is 1 - CM is 2.. All roms worth mention is variations of one of those.. (for Legend that is)
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA Premium App
LiViD said:
I love how you call everyone elses' ROM a rip-off of a CM ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know I'm wasting my time here and I really don't care anyway.
Still I think I have to clarify that I'm not talking about people using some "builds". I'm talking about the source code.
If you want to build a ROM for the Legend (and nearly every other device out there) you've got two choices: Push some files from official releases (RUUs) around and zip them, or compile from source.
As a matter of fact there's no project out there that releases working source code (for anything but Google's official devices) except for CyanogenMod.
Video encoding or decoding? msm* support? Backported code for ancient libcamera, libril and framework support for said ancient libraries? GPS backport or implementation? Kernel backports for Gingerbread? Yeah, good luck finding that somewhere else (no, I don't mean the CAF repositories where we are copying from and giving credit of course).
LiViD said:
Get a life guys, no one would attempt to use your builds unless said person was extremely lazy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Get a life"? Come on, don't be ridiculous.
MD5-sums can be quite revealing by the way. Or boot messages (like "Welcome to CyanogeMod" in MIUI). Some people were even charging for shady rip-offs – that's why the CM team ultimately decided to close down development and switch to "release when it's done".
LiViD said:
Seriously, over 160 attempts at a nightly build...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but you didn't understand the concept of a nightly build? There are no "attempts at a nightly build" and they are not even meant for users. Nightly builds are there to see if current code in the repositories still compiles. Nothing else.
whitetigerdk said:
All roms worth mention is variations of one of those.. (for Legend that is)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately not only for the Legend but for most other devices too.
Android was said to be open but in fact it's just proprietary crap again. No developer wants to spend months doing the work of forty CM devs, so they either join CM – or sometimes steal their work declaring it as their own – or use (or combine) binaries from official releases.
If you didn't care, you would be in other developers threads attacking their attempts at making something that just may work better than what you're pushing out.
Face the facts; People want more choices other than CM. I am willing to admit that CM 6.1 was a damn good ROM when it came out, but I can't for life of me figure out why you guys can't live up to the same expectations with CM7.
I have been testing the NewSense 1.0 RC's (HTC Salsa ROM) for some time, and I as I said; Without the lack of AP support, it works well and does not have the crash prone problems that I have seen with 7.0.3, and 7.1 RC1.
ali ba said:
Unfortunately not only for the Legend but for most other devices too.
Android was said to be open but in fact it's just proprietary crap again. No developer wants to spend months doing the work of forty CM devs, so they either join CM – or sometimes steal their work declaring it as their own – or use (or combine) binaries from official releases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh Sorry.. Didn't know much of other devices.. Recently bought the Desire and currently using MIUI. Must admit that I believed the MIUI to be a completely rewrite of the Android framework..
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA Premium App
LiViD said:
I have been testing the NewSense 1.0 RC's (HTC Salsa ROM) for some time, and I as I said; Without the lack of AP support, it works well and does not have the crash prone problems that I have seen with 7.0.3, and 7.1 RC1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can thanks for that to HTC, because i haven't written a single line of code in NewSense. Only some crappy hacks.
Really, our community is too small and we have a lack of devs, but that's not all. HTC provide to us just ****ty sources. It just sucks!
Btw: this rom here is based on cm7...
Edit: I commented on the wrong ROM. My bad.
I still think Blayo's rom's are the best for Legend!
Been using them for quite a while and I never have had any complain!
whitetigerdk said:
Must admit that I believed the MIUI to be a completely rewrite of the Android framework..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Their earlier releases certainly used CM sources with modified framework and apps. I don't know what they are doing now – but as they don't release their sources I can accuse them of using modified CM source code as much as I want without ever being able to prove it so I refrain from doing that.
If you are interested, the UltimateDroid soap opera is a good read by the way.
ogo2 said:
You can thanks for that to HTC, because i haven't written a single line of code in NewSense. Only some crappy hacks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That doesn't make your work worth less than anyone else's and certainly not "crappy".
ogo2 said:
HTC provide to us just ****ty sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd be happy if they provided the real sources for the binaries they are releasing but as a matter of fact HTC continuously violates the GPL and we can't do anything about that.
LiViD said:
If you didn't care, you would be in other developers threads attacking their attempts at making something that just may work better than what you're pushing out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where exactly did I attack emiliano7's work? I'm actually very glad that someone is developing for the Legend and I never stated anything else.
You obviously on the other hand couldn't resist showing your arrogant attitude by addressing the CM team in this thread making false accusations. You can't take a discussion off-topic and then blame others for taking the same train.
LiViD said:
...the crash prone problems that I have seen with 7.0.3, and 7.1 RC1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Instead of making vague accusations you could have filed bug reports a long time ago. CM is a community project and nothing without its community.
It sometimes still makes me sad that for some people whining doesn't seem to be a problem but as soon as it comes to writing a good bug report they come up with various excuses.
already about 5 ics roms not counting the cm9 alpha, why??
they all have the same bugs
they all have the same things working
super ics kangorama?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1360567
koush's + launcher pro added..
nexus mv ics?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1364411
koush's + glados kernel + v6 supercharger
ultimate ics?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1363765
koush's + some extra wall papers + file explorer
all these things are just a completely alpha ics build with some hacks thrown in.. why?? why not just make a post in the ics thread (either by kwiboo or koush) saying "hey guys use launcher pro if you feel its buggy" or "here is link to glados kernel" instead of making "New ultimate sweet fast ICS rom" when all you are doing is downloading one of the actual source built ics roms and opening it with 7zip and dropping in a new boot.img in there then asking for donations :/
/rant
It is no different than the numerous GB/CM based ROMs. Who cares?
Bounced off a tower to a forum near you!
I think that He ( OP ) won't be happy until they say Beta.. its alpha for a reason. so many bugs much more than beta. just sit happy with GB and give it time. I rushed it and lost the ability for Google Wallet, nothing can fix what went wrong with my phone.
xjreyes said:
I think that He ( OP ) won't be happy until they say Beta.. its alpha for a reason. so many bugs much more than beta. just sit happy with GB and give it time. I rushed it and lost the ability for Google Wallet, nothing can fix what went wrong with my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What happened? I had wallet set up and ready to go, tried it at rite aid and wouldn't go through...
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
these people couldn't be taking part in a hobby for them, could they be just trying to learn the ins and outs of android, heck they couldn't even be kids learning to code and all are getting excited to show off what they complied.
Last time I checked you were not required to flash every rom in the Dev section. So lets take a step back I don't like miui nothing wrong with it but should I be complied to start a thread asking why we have topics about when I don't care for it.
icecoldbong said:
/rant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You said it....
Chill out. We have to get AOSP working bug-free in the first place, then they'll start looking different. Even CM9 doesnt have any CMsettings or anything special. We're sorry that something that we're beating Google at (ICS release for NS) currently is not to your standards.
In due time.....in due time.
I see where the OP is coming from, but I disagree. The fact that the devs work hard to bring the OS to our devices is pretty appreciated. They pretty much do Google's work for free by modifying the code.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
icecoldbong said:
already about 5 ics roms not counting the cm9 alpha, why??
they all have the same bugs
they all have the same things working
super ics kangorama?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1360567
koush's + launcher pro added..
nexus mv ics?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1364411
koush's + glados kernel + v6 supercharger
ultimate ics?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1363765
koush's + some extra wall papers + file explorer
all these things are just a completely alpha ics build with some hacks thrown in.. why?? why not just make a post in the ics thread (either by kwiboo or koush) saying "hey guys use launcher pro if you feel its buggy" or "here is link to glados kernel" instead of making "New ultimate sweet fast ICS rom" when all you are doing is downloading one of the actual source built ics roms and opening it with 7zip and dropping in a new boot.img in there then asking for donations :/
/rant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you missed these two.. http://goo.gl/bdy4w and http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/sammich/crespo/
i can probably find you a few more if you would like more variety
simms22 said:
you missed these two.. http://goo.gl/bdy4w and http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/sammich/crespo/
i can probably find you a few more if you would like more variety
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol im not mad that they are all buggy, im mad that people are "deving" with a buggy base and just adding to it. why not be a little patient, if you cant create it/build it from source, wait til the base you will be using to 7zip and copypaste into your rom becomes stable. dont use an alpha build to promote your name
icecoldbong said:
lol im not mad that they are all buggy, im mad that people are "deving" with a buggy base and just adding to it. why not be a little patient, if you cant create it/build it from source, wait til the base you will be using to 7zip and copypaste into your rom becomes stable. dont use an alpha build to promote your name
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you quite understand how it works currently. There is no buggy base. They're attempting to adapt AOSP source code to compile and execute correctly on the Nexus S. This is way more complicated than you think. Almost all "bugs" you see are byproducts of tinkering with configurations, compile-ations, etc, in an attempt to get it working properly.
To put things in perspective, ICS development for the Nexus S is light years ahead of all other devices. For that reason alone, we should be grateful. Others are still struggling to either boot, or get somewhere AFTER boot.
If you don't like the way it's done, then wait for the official ROM. You have a choice, after all.
nickmv said:
I don't think you quite understand how it works currently. There is no buggy base. They're attempting to adapt AOSP source code to compile and execute correctly on the Nexus S. This is way more complicated than you think. Almost all "bugs" you see are byproducts of tinkering with configurations, compile-ations, etc, in an attempt to get it working properly.
If you don't like the way it's done, then wait for the official ROM. You have a choice, after all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, two roms are getting built from the source on xda; kwiboo and koush. then all the others.
both kwiboo and koush thread is full of bug reports of people using a different rom like brainmaster, ultimate ics, kangorama ics, etc.
all this does is add confusion from the rom chef adding things to the original rom developers work
what im suggesting/ranting is that if a rom chefs should be a little more patient in making more spinoff roms that don't really add much besides to confusion for noob users
Your argument makes a LOT more sense now. I agree, if people are posting bugs in Koush/Kwiboo sections when running brainmaster or other tweaked versions, then that's bad.
Your original argument didn't really point this out.
Not much can be done about that, aside from aggressive moderation. Tweakers will be tweakers.
nickmv said:
Your argument makes a LOT more sense now. I agree, if people are posting bugs in Koush/Kwiboo sections when running brainmaster or other tweaked versions, then that's bad.
Your original argument didn't really point this out.
Not much can be done about that, aside from aggressive moderation. Tweakers will be tweakers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the bugs posted are not even valid. One in particular is known issue even on the GNexus.
The biggest issue I see is code optimization at this point.
One thing I think no one has mentioned is ICS may never be super fast on the NS. I will be much faster on dual core hardware
Bounced off a tower to a forum near you!
RonnieRuff said:
One thing I think no one has mentioned is ICS may never be super fast on the NS. I will be much faster on dual core hardware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is one thing that has been bothering me as well. Every single one of these ROMs are not truly as smooth as Gingerbread. In no way do they even reach the fluidity found in Gingerbread ROMS. The hardware acceleration helps, but even then you can still feel the difference between the two Android releases. I have yet to hear a proper explanation as to why this is happening and I was hoping that the fix for this would be Google releasing the official Ice Cream Sandwich update.
Is it is code optimization as you say? Or is there more to it than that? I want to believe that hardware doesn't play a significant role here.
Eclair~ said:
This is one thing that has been bothering me as well. Every single one of these ROMs are not truly as smooth as Gingerbread. In no way do they even reach the fluidity found in Gingerbread ROMS. The hardware acceleration helps, but even then you can still feel the difference between the two Android releases. I have yet to hear a proper explanation as to why this is happening and I was hoping that the fix for this would be Google releasing the official Ice Cream Sandwich update.
Is it is code optimization as you say? Or is there more to it than that? I want to believe that hardware doesn't play a significant role here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree 100% no released rom before ota is even out is worth running.. I ran koush or w/e and it worked but felt like I was holding a brick.. ruff! Brainmasters straight looks like android donut.. but so does cyanogens.. no disrespect to any of the above.. but htcclay is god..
Edit: wasn't brainmaster it was some one else.. sorry
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Siri
BLEEDCOLORYOU said:
Agree 100% no released rom before ota is even out is worth running.. I ran koush or w/e and it worked but felt like I was holding a brick.. ruff! Brainmasters straight looks like android donut.. but so does cyanogens.. no disrespect to any of the above.. but htcclay is god..
Edit: wasn't brainmaster it was some one else.. sorry
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Siri
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange, I've found that Koush's latest (CM9 Alpha 11) is plenty fast, not significantly slower than GB. Definitely Kwiboo v2 was slow as molasses, but then again it came out days ago (a long time when it comes to how fast things are moving). BM v5 is pretty fast but buggy. Also, it seems that adding franco kernel to any of these also speeds things up significantly, but I haven't tried it with CM9 Alpha 11 yet.
oakamil said:
Strange, I've found that Koush's latest (CM9 Alpha 11) is plenty fast, not significantly slower than GB. Definitely Kwiboo v2 was slow as molasses, but then again it came out days ago (a long time when it comes to how fast things are moving). BM v5 is pretty fast but buggy. Also, it seems that adding franco kernel to any of these also speeds things up significantly, but I haven't tried it with CM9 Alpha 11 yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found kwiboo's to be a lot more stable than koush's. although koush's had more functionality.. my bluetooth didnt work, and i got many errors.
Understand that we are using old binaries. ICS will run just as good as gingerbread, if not, better. These will make a world of difference
RonnieRuff said:
One thing I think no one has mentioned is ICS may never be super fast on the NS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd kind of disagree with this. In its current early state here on the NS, I've gotten it running butter smooth and highly responsive, on a 1.1 OC/UV kernel. This is WITHOUT tweaks to filesystem, etc. If certain apps would just display properly when GPU Rendering is turned on, and some battery stuff worked out, I'd be 100% content.
Now granted, I've seen it running on the SGS2 and Galaxy Nexus and they're clearly speedier, but in my experience, my apps run just as fast as they did in GB.
On a side note....wanna see slow? It's been ported to the T-Mobile G1! HA! The first, original android phone!
I agree. there was actually a recent article on android police about this. There is no problem with people making their own roms but don't clog up the development section with "roms" that really all they do is bundle some easily downloadable market apps and some wallpapers and call it a new rom.
What the SGS2 xda forum actually did was split the dev section into 2 . One for original dev work and one for spin offs.
[JB][WIP]The Jelly Bean Project!ou Jelly Bean Android 4.1/4.1.1 to your Gtab 8.9! AOSP BUILD
Project stopped we have now already a Jelly bean Rom Thanks to Kallt_Kaffe
Current status:
- Project Stopped
Downloads
Downloads:
* Project Stopped see this page: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1777398 Thanks To Kallt_Kaffe
Great news...love me some Jelly Beans
Very great news! Take your time
Verstuurd van mijn GT-P7310 met Tapatalk
Same opinion here, take your time safariking, waiting patiently.
First Alpha version this week!
BUILD YOUR OWN
For those interested in building this ROM, you can try my Linux script. It doesn't set the build environment (gcc, git, java, etc), that depends of your distro. But it should make things easier.
Code: git clone https://github.com/maplesci/jellybeanBuilder.git ~/development/scripts/jellybeanBuilder
You can change the work directories, and be sure to change the paths for the java exports.
This is from the 10.1 port of jb maybe it will help.
Should be possible include gsm capabilities?
Due you are doing new porting, should be possible to add gsm capabilities for the 8.9 3G?
Thanks.
Is there any chance the Dev's can also include the 7230?
Not much love given the 7230 LTE which is a shame, not used to running a stock ROM... Really need to sit down one day and work out how to do this stuff
EndoSurf said:
Is there any chance the Dev's can also include the 7230?
Not much love given the 7230 LTE which is a shame, not used to running a stock ROM... Really need to sit down one day and work out how to do this stuff
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, Devs could try. As far as I know, does this device not have a completely different CPU and all that? If someone could get ICS to run, then probably.
tommrazek01 said:
Well, Devs could try. As far as I know, does this device not have a completely different CPU and all that? If someone could get ICS to run, then probably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same hardware as the skyrocket
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda premium
Moved To General
XDA does not allow place holders. OP please PM me when you have something and i will move this to the development section
Compiling build now First Alpha build today!
safariking said:
Compiling build now First Alpha build today!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, whats the status? Is it working. On CM10 is working also well, only Google Play Store has a Problem. It's lists only a handful apps as compatible.
Im still trying to get this working
Sorry for bursting your bubble, but what are you trying to accomplish with this project, that already isn't done by much experienced kallt_caffe or Cyanogenmod crew in their CM10 alpha?
It's good to know your limits, and promising something that you cannot accomplish is only fooling yourself. Don't get me wrong, it's great to be ambitious, but I think you are overdoing it, and biting more than you can chew . Seeing your work so far, I honestly don't see you as a real developer, so please let more experienced people to work on this, and focus on something within your limits, that can actually benefit the community.
This may sound cruel, and it could raise the question "oh yea, so what have you done to contribute?", but i'm only trying to be realistic here.
Thread Closed
As development has stopped