Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
2015?! that's insane. i must try this...
Whoa and to think the galaxy tab only gets 1050...
Shows how nuch the nook kicks @ss
urbanengine1 said:
Whoa and to think the galaxy tab only gets 1050...
Shows how nuch the nook kicks @ss
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
50mhz more.....lollllllllll
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I just installed the same kernel today and my NC is way faster. I don't know where to look for the quadrant info, but my pdf's are being rendered instantaneously. I was planning on returning my NC because pdf reading was a pain, but it works perfect now...
Yeah but try it on a real benchmark like smartbench and I bet it starts looking more realistic.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
eunkipark92 said:
50mhz more.....lollllllllll
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh? The tab gets around 1000 less
Could you give a brief explantion of how to do this?. I've only tried the autonoter so far.
Sent from my rooted Nook Color
That's exciting, how's the battery life, by the way?
hawaiianhopper said:
Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hawaiianhopper said:
Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed the same kernel on Eclair and got ~1200. I've been running back to back benchmarks now and have gotten 1050, 972, 923, then 1211... Strange
hawaiianhopper said:
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure you didn't fat finger that 2?
shatteredeagle said:
Sure you didn't fat finger that 2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If he is running Froyo, no. Froyo easily sees a 300-500 point boost over eclair, because of the improved JIT compilier that is in Froyo.
hawaiianhopper said:
Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it stable though? And still undervolted?
Anyways, gTablet with most custom fw gets c. 2400-2500 but can hit 3200+ with some additional mods... still just a synthetic benchmark though...
hawaiianhopper said:
Woohoo!!! Thanks to new kernel by Dalingrin, I'm running at 1.1GHz.
Just scored my best Quadrant score to date: 2015
This is on Froyo 5.9, running off of emmc!!!
Was stoked and had to tell someone. Since I have no posts, it wouldn't let me post in dev forum. So here is my first post......
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post a guide to installing? I can get it to work right. emmc is way faster, scoring 1478 at 800 right now.
2006 is the highest I can get....
I tried it about 10 times lol...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sorry about the URL. Using this picture elsewhere. Ever since getting out of the military and the soon to be ex wife turning off my Sprint phone, I've been flashing a lot of Android devices.
I was about to post a pic, but because I don't have enough posts to link outside, so I can't....
I got 2013 yesterday when I tried to take a screen cap.
It doesn't always get that high. Just every so often it does. Can't explain the differences.
Steps:
Followed original eemc thread in the "general" forum (not one from dev forum).
Got that working correctly.
then mount /boot and copy uImage over old one. reboot and presto!
What's amazing I'm running customized nookie 59 with the 1100 kernel on a class 4 8GB card. I'm getting the same speed as with the standard 59 image installed on the emmc.
edit; The pic is a little fuzzy, 2048 was my best score with setcpu set to performance. In conservative I seem to be around the 2020 ball park.
Beats the hell out of me. I would have never of thought it if I had not seen it with my own eyes.
I included the lock screen picture to prove it was the customized froyo, I don't think there is an img file of it that can be installed...yet.
urbanengine1 said:
Huh? The tab gets around 1000 less
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, quadrant scores database r/w pretty heavily and stock galaxy s and tabs are pretty bad there.
they're getting scores around 2900 on the archos gen 8's with ext4. it's with a oc to 1280 also. the biggest boost is b/c of the db r/w. at stock (1ghz) i think they were scoring 2400.
I thought I read that the Nook Color kernels still don't have the drivers for the graffics chip. If the graffics get sorted out we should another big jump.
For being an ereader, this thing is turning out to be the little engine that could. I wonder if the team that developed the NC had a tablet in mind or was it that TI had a tablet project that fell apart and they were just trying to salvage it. Either way its a surprising device.
just got my nook color and deciding on rooting it then OCing it ..
but undecided on eclair or froyo pathways..
the stock kernel eclair has gpu drivers and the froyo kernel does not right ?
Related
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
CM7 Quadrant Error
duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine gets an "internal error" on "CPU Video Decoding." So, nothing yet.
duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Score is kind of low. I got a 1164 I am running Nookie Froyo with a 1.1Ghz kernel.
Is honeycomb significantly faster?
It appears it gets hung for a second on Video and Audio decoding. My Motorola Droid is running Project Elite V5.2 overclocked at 1.1Ghz and it scores a 1832 quadrant score.
Roughly 1,050-1,100 on Autonooter 3.0 @1GHz.
My OG Droid on CM7 #13 gets 881 @800MHz. But it FEELS faster. It's odd that the NC doesn't see the immediate performance improvements brought on with Froyo like phones did. Maybe the ROM's just aren't as developed so intensely. Hopefully someone running CM7 for NC can chime in so we can compare.
duglas said:
I thought my Nook was kinda slow compaired to my MyTouch 4G so I thought I would check it..
nook/honeycomb is getting 1863 which is not too bad, faster than my Nexus One got...
What is everyone else getting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same configuration running off a Class 6 SDCard gets me ~1200 (just under the Droid X on the comparison screen). I thought this was great until I saw your score...
On CM7 Nightly v14 with CWM 3.0.1.0....
Quadrant testing died when it got to H.264 decoding. No DSP video yet.
I can't even get it to run on Stock rooted. After I click yet after the test it just gets a service error and shows black screen.
Reneg4d3 said:
My Score is kind of low. I got a 1164 I am running Nookie Froyo with a 1.1Ghz kernel.
Is honeycomb significantly faster?
It appears it gets hung for a second on Video and Audio decoding. My Motorola Droid is running Project Elite V5.2 overclocked at 1.1Ghz and it scores a 1832 quadrant score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is something that has stuck me as odd, since i remember earlier Froyo builds that i ran getting well into 1600-1800+.. but like yours mine right now only gets ~1200..
Wow, dont know why you all are getting such low numbers, running HC v4 off EMMC I am getting 1800+ almost every time. Any insight on this?
benchmarks are just numbers, don't worry about your quadrant scores. worry on real world performance
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I 've just got a 2613 with Cyanogen 7 overclocked to 1.2.
1511 running off internal memory with CM7 Nightly 55 at 925Mhz
Quadrant is seriously flawed
I get anywhere from 3200 ~ 3700+ on my stock unrooted SGS 2
cm7 7.0.2 925mhz on SD card anywhere between 1600-1800
Not sure if this is for real but it seems to work, available on android market.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
uslacson1 said:
Not sure if this is for real but it seems to work, available on android market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Attached screen shot.
Thought id check this out just to see what happens. It actually does appear to overclock and make real changes phone seems much snappier like it was with eclair and my voodoo over clock kernel then i thought i perform a quadrant. Some serious increases in framerates after setting overclock to 1.3 gigaouches. And has a much higher score, seems to transfer to real world performance.
Here is a before and after screen shot one at stock 1 gighertz voodoo
The next at 1.3 gigeherts voodoo. Both superclean 2.9.2 ec10 kernel.
I also added a widget to my sccreen to see if it really does say its at 1.3 gigaherts and it does. Phone seems stable and not acting weird at all. Will probably keep using
dalrym05 said:
Thought id check this out just to see what happens. It actually does appear to overclock and make real changes phone seems much snappier like it was with eclair and my voodoo over clock kernel then i thought i perform a quadrant. Some serious increases in framerates after setting overclock to 1.3 gigaouches. And has a much higher score, seems to transfer to real world performance.
Here is a before and after screen shot one at stock 1 gighertz voodoo
The next at 1.3 gigeherts voodoo. Both superclean 2.9.2 ec10 kernel.
I also added a widget to my sccreen to see if it really does say its at 1.3 gigaherts and it does. Phone seems stable and not acting weird at all. Will probably keep using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freezes neocore and nfs at 1.3, more stable for me at 1.25
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
This app appears to just module overclock similar to.what.the droid x/milestone does
its neat but not ideal
for those that care about oc...true 2.2 kernels im sure can be pushed farther than this and 2.1....1.4 appears stable on other sgs variants
This would probably suffice until some real optimzed OCed 2.2 kernels start coming out.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
I have been using this at 1.3 all day and all is good. Nice substitute untilled some good kernels come out although this feels just as speedy as eclair. No complaints here at all. Deffinately a nice find. I can't believe I haven't herd about this sooner.
Lol i talked to the developer of this and told him about the froyo source for fascinate/mesmerize and he said he didnt know fascinates source was out already,he said i was the first one requesting him an sch i500 compatibility
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
So with jt's latest kernel, is this app still useful? Or was it something fit to use until the custom kernels started coming out?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
PeterGunz said:
So with jt's latest kernel, is this app still useful? Or was it something fit to use until the custom kernels started coming out?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jt no longer overclocks his kernels and hasn't for a longtime....so for those that want overclocks this is the only way until someone puts out an oc kernel
nitsuj17 said:
Jt no longer overclocks his kernels and hasn't for a longtime....so for those that want overclocks this is the only way until someone puts out an oc kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What he said. I like this app though even though mine works great all the way up. For someone who can't run that fast if the phone were to lock. When it reboots its back to stock. Fail safe. Not a pain to reactivate either.
This makes me cautious for some reason...
SC 2.9.2/ EC10 Voodoo+Sound/ NitroHoney v3.1.1/ [email protected] 1.1
Almost 16 hours, stable and fast!
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
jenisiz said:
This makes me cautious for some reason...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What makes you cautious? Before any hardware gets messed up the phone will lock up and/or reboot then you'll be at stock speeds again. Although I haven't had any issues.
Wow. Real noticeable difference here. easy to use. Tried the 1.3 but the phone would freeze. 1.25 did thee trick for me. It sets back to default after every boot too which is pretty cool.
jenisiz said:
This makes me cautious for some reason...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? Nothing to be scared of. I can vouch it works well my friend and not only is it zippy (on whatever setting u have it on), it also resets to default after each boot. No worries!
I know quadrents are so so and not accurate on performance, but I get higher readings on 1.5 rather than 2.0. Always score in 1900s on 1.5 and 1600 on 2.0.
actually don't like this feature...
farewell_goodbye2u said:
Why? Nothing to be scared of. I can vouch it works well my friend and not only is it zippy (on whatever setting u have it on), it also resets to default after each boot. No worries!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
title says it all I noticed a nice difference in real world performance as well as every type of quadrant-like program you could use to score your speed but I wish that it would start on boot so if I need to restart my phone for whatever reason I don't have to go back in and reset everything.. really really want auto boot for this.
This is an interesting app...
GizmoDroid said:
This is an interesting app...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, you have proven to me time and time again to never believe screenshots of YOUR Quadrant scores! lol. J/k. I am going to check this out, hopefully with the same success as the rest of you.
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The linpack mflops looks great. I get 11 on a tweaked out 2.6.29 @800mhz
The quadrant isn't amazing but I think its at least an improvement over the stock 2.6.29 kernel. I get 1800-1900 running my latest test kernel @ 800mhz on Gingerbread(quadrant typically scores less in Gingerbread than Froyo unlike other benchmarks)
Looks like 2.6.32 has some potential.
Holy crap....
This is going to be great once we get kernel source and can undervolt/overlcock this sucka
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
notinterested said:
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
dsf3g said:
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
s52m3 said:
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Masterface7 said:
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
dalingrin said:
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found the exact opposite to be true. I go to a site that has videos not optimized for mobile and on CM7 they are simply not watchable. With the 1.2 flash its not perfect but certainly better than it is in CM7. Which is surprising because when im on CM7 i run 1100MHZ compared to the 800 with the 1.2 flash.
Anyone else have linpack scores on 1.2 they can post?
Linpack score sux
davidukfl said:
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
LINKPACK
score is 6.056 mflops, in 13.84 seconds, normal resolution 5.68, set cpu 925 mhz max/min running cyanogen 7.0.3 will all processes closed.
QUADRANT STANDARD
score is avg roughly 900 and i'm getting anywhere from 3 to 38 fps.
i've owned n1, m.droid, evo and now dinc that all ran cyanogen and never saw such low scores. i don't know if this nook color is just a little premature or that i'm putting too much emphasis on these scores but i believe there's a 2 ghz tablet around the corner with more horsepower. what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why did you bump this just to scatter crap?
Running CM7 and OC, I'm hitting quad scores of 2400-3000
Try messing with the NC more before you write it off.
I also agree...
If you are getting scores that low, then something is wrong, wrong, wrong.
I am operating on the CM 7.0.3 and have the thing OC'd at 1300.
I get consistent scores in the 2500 - 2900 range...
Lego
All day...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Suck it stock IncS.
3651 at that same frequency.
my loss of points was SD card because I'm using a class 2 16gb card, not the 8gb class 4 that came with it.
Different benchmarks as I took them a few weeks ago, but could be interesting for the sake of comparison anyways. The first picture was taken at stock clock speed using the Quadrant benchmark. The second was taken @ 1209MHz and the third @ 1401MHz I believe (I didn't take note so it may vary +- 100MHz). I wasn't brave enough to go any higher Although I know that the Tiamat kernel could allow you to go up to 2.0GHz which is just ridiculous. Setup shown in my signature.
ARHD 1.1.7 and Quadrant Advanced.
itsbeertimenow said:
All day...
Suck it stock IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering what ROM you were using on that test?
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
AnTuTu
Quadrant
More recent
this competition may lead to some bricked devices..anyways will make a good paper weight...
Sent from my inspire 4g using cm7 n259
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
itsbeertimenow said:
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that guy has an Incredible S phone and today isn't national trolling day, right? So this even is actually possible, but still very hard to believe. Even though he managed to overclock it's GPU then it's more reasonable...
So here's my benchmark http://www.upload.ee/image/1850697/2011-11-29_22-45-30.png -.-
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
specifications please. thats really amazing bechmark !
highKo said:
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
highKo said:
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uv/oc setting s are always restored to the kernel default once your phone is restarted unless you have your app set to "set on boot" which is never a good idea as bricks are made this way. And yes when you flash a new Rom it installs a new kernel and your setting s are set to the kernels default until you set up your oc app from wihtin your Rom.
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
keroro430 said:
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bench was clocked at 1804 it tottally depends on which Rom your using and which kernel. That was cm nihtlies and I can't remember the kernel, all I remember was the title contained the words "lightning fast". I've used roms with kernels that won't let you surpass 1.1 ghz and I've used ones that let you o.c. to 2.1. Weather or not your phone locks up is a different story. It doesn't seem to matter if its sense or aosp as I've had both clocked over 1.8. Generally the phone will freeze if you have uncompatible settings and it tries to run more than 4 processes at once.
here's mine.
Cyanogenmod 7 Nightly + Lord Clockan's kernel also ICS theme really looks great.
This bench is at 1.6Ghz but normally it's set to ~1.2Ghz and get almost 3 days battery life.
Incredible S is an incredible phone!
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Equinox_br said:
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before something changed I was able to get 3400 with 1Ghz and vorkkernel
So, this means that my score is bad?
What can I do to make it better?
Stock phone I was scoring like 2700, Volkernel 1Ghz like 2900 and now at 1.4Ghz with 3900.
Stock Galaxy S II scores something like 3200 if I remember.
Maybe you were running 1.1.6 version of Quadrant no?
that just score, and in benchmark, you will not see difference between 3000 and 3400 when you use it. the best combination is, when you feel a very big woow.
i got that feel with latest GO Launcher EX, and stock v10D with latest neoblaze [email protected] ext4, i removed cardock or what, and now i see a very very big difference with a very good standby time.
very fast scrolls in browser, gallery, and settings and launcher, install apps 5x faster, take shot 2x faster with camera, and the speed in browser is extremly fast. it boots much faster, you can try init.d tweaks for memory management.
and now... you can spend your time with make your homescreen, or skin nicer and nicer, and then share with us
With topogigi v1.7, OC at 1,4GHz got 4110 in quadrant!
At 1GHz was 3231
Edit with v1.9 +SP1 & HP kernel RC1 @1,4GHz "4416"
Custom kernels support "epeen enlargment".
Thats a different aproach to how sql database writes which doesnt make difference in speed in real use but makes a huge diference in benchmarks.
Where you see "sql hack" avoid it. No real advantage and it could be a potentcial data loss.
So there is a big part of the change
Wow...Reading this I feel like I still have to learn a lot about Android developments! hehe
In general I'm very satisfied with my phone, its fast, stable, never had an error.
I'll see if I can touch the 4000 score without increase processor speed, any tip?
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
Edit:
Guys, my 3g network was bad and I tried to restart my phone, when initializing he froze on LG logo (second one). I tried to replace the Kernel and had no success, so I had to reinstall CM7!! And the phone worked....I think that the problem was a Vorkernel update that I made by a program called Vorkernel update inside the OS!
Now I'm using the stock kernel from CM7 till get home at least. I ran Quadrant again and got 3143 point @1.0Ghz! That is a lot! hehe
Leaked GB 2.3.4
1.4ghz NeoBlaze ROM
Quadrant 1.1.7
2760 score. My phone is broken
Ah.. 3182 now, overclocking program wasn't working!
3658 run two...
3710 run 3.. nice.
Restored phone, went to Topogigi 1.9, 1.4ghz still, now getting around 4600... much better.
Topogigi 1.8 sp1
1,4Ghz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Topogigi's 1.9...
justclimb said:
Topogigi's 1.9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unable to download..:-( :-(
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
indyjones83 said:
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4586 for me ;-)
2541 At stock looks like a bad score to me :/
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Striatum_bdr said:
4586 for me ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While we're having a pissing contest...
Mungulz said:
While we're having a pissing contest...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, in Topogigi's thread a guy showed a nearly 5000 screenshot with some tweaks of his own..
It's probably good to remind that tweaking a ROM to have better scores in benchmarks doesn't mean a better user experience in practical use.
When you know which tests are made by the benchmark app, you can optimize the dedicated part of code in ROM to have better results, it dosn't mean the entire ROM will be snappier. The most famous is sqlite optimizations as all benchmarks use sqlite tests...
So it can give a good idea but it's not the Holy Bible...
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Soulj4h said:
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine on stock 2350-2600
So dont worry
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
I'm thinking if I should install the neoblaze kernel on stock
You should, if you have spare batteries
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk