I had always thought that I897 was captivate, and I9000 was all other Galaxy S phones. But I have a captivate that lists its "model number" as GT-I9000, and see here that captivate users are installing I9000 ROMs. Am I wrong about the difference?
Not development.
Captivate = i897
Galaxy S = i9000
Sent from my Captivate using XDA Premium.
QuarkGluonSoup said:
I had always thought that I897 was captivate, and I9000 was all other Galaxy S phones. But I have a captivate that lists its "model number" as GT-I9000, and see here that captivate users are installing I9000 ROMs. Am I wrong about the difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as mikey said, this isn't development related.
you are merely installing i9000 ROM's with reoriented kernels.
/thread
Kaik541 said:
as mikey said, this isn't development related.
you are merely installing i9000 ROM's with reoriented kernels.
/thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As they both said - what part of development does this fall under?!
I've noticed something around here at XDA that is really kind of odd to me. Whenever a new guy comes here and posts a thread not knowing that it isn't the right thread to post on. There's always the "too cool" attitude thrown out by a few. I know that XDA is here to help others and think that maybe instead of posting smartass replies that maybe an answer to the question and a point in the right direction would be the best thing to help a noob out. I've learned more from the great guys here at XDA (ADAMHOLDEN85, MIKEYMIKE01, KIZZMIAZZ, ZELENDEL, EXTREMEKILLA09, TSACHI) from their positive attitudes and direction than I've learned from any other forum. Keep it welcome here guys.
task650 said:
I've noticed something around here at XDA that is really kind of odd to me. Whenever a new guy comes here and posts a thread not knowing that it isn't the right thread to post on. There's always the "too cool" attitude thrown out by a few. I know that XDA is here to help others and think that maybe instead of posting smartass replies that maybe an answer to the question and a point in the right direction would be the best thing to help a noob out. I've learned more from the great guys here at XDA (ADAMHOLDEN85, MIKEYMIKE01, KIZZMIAZZ, ZELENDEL, EXTREMEKILLA09, TSACHI) from their positive attitudes and direction than I've learned from any other forum. Keep it welcome here guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ Amen to that!
yeah, for real, it only takes one guy to correct the miss placed thread and a mod to move it. and you can correct a person and be helpful at the same time.
to the op, if the captivate is saying gt -i9000 on a splash screen on startup or on your computer when plugged in to usb then it is a modded i9000 kernel installed, this is very common because the source code for the i9000 was realeased long before the captivate and things like overclock and color fixes could be baked in. a lack of source on the captivate meant that either you ran 2.1, ran 2.2 basically stock or you used an i9000 kernel to get all the good stuff. if it says i9000 in about phone or in apps then you have an i9000 rom and the build.prop was not changed.
to be clear the att captivate is the i897, the armani is the i9010 the rogers is the i896 and the chinese version is the i9088. the i897 and i896 are identical aside from the rom, the armani has a different battery door and maybe darker plastic, i haven't seen one up close. the chinese version may have other difference like less ram.
the i9000 is sold in many countries and is the real galaxy s. it has a forward facing camera. it is sold in many countries and has several versions including the i9000m and i9000b, the b has an antenna to pickup live digital hd tv and is sold in brazil
the i500 is the fascinate and the mezmerize in the us and is cdma.
the t959 is the vibrant in the us and the t959d is the facinate in canada. these are the closest relatives to the captivates but look more like a i9000.
then there is the epic, i dont remember the model of it but it has a forward facing camera and a slide out keyboard. it is cdma and i think do to the stock software, that it is an epic piece of crap!
there are others now such as the nexus s i9020 which is a google dev phone and has aosp gingerbread, and the indulge which isn't quite a galaxy s but does have the hummingbird chip and adds a keyboard and lte data network
Couldn't have said it better. The same reason why I waited so long to push into the custom side. Sick of the attitude on here(for the most part). Am I new to android or XDA for that matter? Maybe. But I am not stupid and I don't deserve to be treated like I am. Anyways...
Longer story short...I resorted to learning by a q&a session with one of the nicer devs. And by the end of a couple pm's back and forth, I was flashing my first rom with no problems.
A little kindness can go a long way people..
I agree. Calm down folks. Everyone makes mistakes especially whe they are new to something. I'm new to and posted a few questions in the Q&A section but some people act totally anal in response there. Need more people like the nice dev's who are patient and calm with their users.
Wheres the moral fiber thread?
Dani897 said:
yeah, for real, it only takes one guy to correct the miss placed thread and a mod to move it. and you can correct a person and be helpful at the same time.
to the op, if the captivate is saying gt -i9000 on a splash screen on startup or on your computer when plugged in to usb then it is a modded i9000 kernel installed, this is very common because the source code for the i9000 was realeased long before the captivate and things like overclock and color fixes could be baked in. a lack of source on the captivate meant that either you ran 2.1, ran 2.2 basically stock or you used an i9000 kernel to get all the good stuff. if it says i9000 in about phone or in apps then you have an i9000 rom and the build.prop was not changed.
to be clear the att captivate is the i897, the armani is the i9010 the rogers is the i896 and the chinese version is the i9088. the i897 and i896 are identical aside from the rom, the armani has a different battery door and maybe darker plastic, i haven't seen one up close. the chinese version may have other difference like less ram.
the i9000 is sold in many countries and is the real galaxy s. it has a forward facing camera. it is sold in many countries and has several versions including the i9000m and i9000b, the b has an antenna to pickup live digital hd tv and is sold in brazil
the i500 is the fascinate and the mezmerize in the us and is cdma.
the t959 is the vibrant in the us and the t959d is the facinate in canada. these are the closest relatives to the captivates but look more like a i9000.
then there is the epic, i dont remember the model of it but it has a forward facing camera and a slide out keyboard. it is cdma and i think do to the stock software, that it is an epic piece of crap!
there are others now such as the nexus s i9020 which is a google dev phone and has aosp gingerbread, and the indulge which isn't quite a galaxy s but does have the hummingbird chip and adds a keyboard and lte data network
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't the Nexus S actually made by Samsung,too?
Sent from a place my wife doesn't know about
task650 said:
I've noticed something around here at XDA that is really kind of odd to me. Whenever a new guy comes here and posts a thread not knowing that it isn't the right thread to post on. There's always the "too cool" attitude thrown out by a few. I know that XDA is here to help others and think that maybe instead of posting smartass replies that maybe an answer to the question and a point in the right direction would be the best thing to help a noob out. I've learned more from the great guys here at XDA (ADAMHOLDEN85, MIKEYMIKE01, KIZZMIAZZ, ZELENDEL, EXTREMEKILLA09, TSACHI) from their positive attitudes and direction than I've learned from any other forum. Keep it welcome here guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't have said it better myself!
Related
Hey everyone, I kind of have a question that might be hard to answer. But maybe one of you can speak from experience with Rogers and android phones in general. Well my question is this. When the Rogers Captivate comes out later this month will the method of rooting be the same as the at&t version for the most part? I also wonder if there is a chance (maybe this has happened to other android phones in the past?) that Rogers will be a gigantic wiener and make it IMPOSSIBLE to root it at all?
Disregarding my questions for a second, it's a pleasure to finally join this forum and thanks for taking the time to read this.
Cheers!
First off, welcome to XDA, glad to have you with us.
Now onwards with your question. It's almost impossible, maybe even illegal, for a carrier to block rooting on an Android device. The whole point of these phones is OPEN SOURCE. The rooting method should be almost identical for the most part. Because we don't have Rogers here, nobody can truly say for sure, but I'd imagine it would be the same.
Oh, that's really interesting! Thanks
Hey,
The phone releases this Monday and the model number for the Rogers version is SGH-i896 whereas the ATT version is SGH-i897. Some files would need to be updated but nothing major. Hopefully we get the support for the Rogers Captivate and can flash it with the awesome custom ROMS
(my first post on the forum and would love to learn and contribute to the awesome xda team)
iswapnil90 said:
Hey,
The phone releases this Monday and the model number for the Rogers version is SGH-i896 whereas the ATT version is SGH-i897. Some files would need to be updated but nothing major. Hopefully we get the support for the Rogers Captivate and can flash it with the awesome custom ROMS
(my first post on the forum and would love to learn and contribute to the awesome xda team)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome to you as well! I'm not so sure that any files would have to be updated. As long as the hardware is exactly the same, all should be well.
miztaken1312 said:
Welcome to you as well! I'm not so sure that any files would have to be updated. As long as the hardware is exactly the same, all should be well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The update scripts have the model number in them which would have to be updated. Nothing major.
Interesting, for roms and such it does not sound like too much of a hassle. But maybe having the exact same hardware wasn't necessarily for the best. I got kind of excited with hopes that this new Captivate would be capable of handling 3.5G I think it's referred to HSPUA+ (Don't quote me on that!) Does anyone know if this is the case?
On a side note, do any current or upcoming phones support 3.5G on the Rogers network?
Hey all,
As the Captivate becomes more popular, I'm seeing more and more ROMs pop up. Problem is, I can't quite figure out the differences between most of them. They all seem to have the exact same features.
Currently on the front page I see:
Cognition
Perception
AXURA
Assonance
di11igaf's ROM
eSPyeL's ROM
As I look through the features, most of it looks pretty similar. So my question is, can anyone break down the key differences between the ROMs? While we're at it, maybe we can discuss the different kernels too?
This belongs in Q & A not in development please!
We need to keep this area clean for development threads only.
Regards
Ugh, sorry. I feel like a dumbass.
shaolin95 said:
This belongs in Q & A not in development please!
We need to keep this area clean for development threads only.
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thecoolestcow said:
Ugh, sorry. I feel like a dumbass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
damn I m too late to flame the thread
None of the people who frequent the Q&A forums are of any help :-/
DAGr8 said:
damn I m too late to flame the thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course you are too late, look, that other guys has flames in his sig, you know he means business when flaming! lol
Anyway, read the OP on each rom, they all have different things
To the Q&A!!
Thecoolestcow has a good point... plus 90% of the posts in the dev threads are 'omg I can't wait'/'hey good job'/'wah wah im a noob' .
Seriously...1000 pages on a dev thread... that's beyond useless.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
More effective thread locking please.
Could we have something besides community flaming to deter the junk posters?
thecoolestcow said:
None of the people who frequent the Q&A forums are of any help :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I make it a point to come to Q&A and try and help.
The problem is the overwhelming number of ZOMG WUT DU I DOOOO threads that push valid questions down to oblivion.
410 views and nobody has answered his question.
As far as I know (which may contain incorrect information), each rom is built off the same base rom. There are captivate based frameworks and i9000 based frameworks. Then there are kernels and models.
Some roms emphasize stability, they do not use the latest overclocked kernels, they stick to stock filesystems etc. Other roms emphasize the latest breakthroughs in Galaxy S modifications (1200-1600mhz OC/UV, speedtweaks, filesystem changes). Another rom may emphasize reduced-bloat, everything is stock but theres no crapware. And on top of it all, everyone mixes and matches kernels and modems (but most are on JK3 and i9000 Kernels, though most use SeitroN's and DG has his own). On top of all that, developers apply themes that they like (all of which you can customize yourself).
I hope that helped. I haven't researched deeply into each rom, but this is just what I've deducted.
Rodderik said:
If any one wants to donate a Tab I will be more than happy to develop a kernel for the users.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone keen?
I believe it would be extremely advantages to have more developers working the tab. I have the utmost respect for the handful that seem to do the work of double their numbers but someone like Rodderik would not only bring himself to the party but there would undoubtedly be others that follow him.
I am between employment right now otherwise there would be one in the post on its way to him/her but I would be open to a small contribution if this could get momentum. Please only leave productive comments.. if its not something you're interested in seeing happen let the thread die a sinking death!
nobleskill said:
Anyone keen?
I believe it would be extremely advantages to have more developers working the tab. I have the utmost respect for the handful that seem to do the work of double their numbers but someone like Rodderik would not only bring himself to the party but there would undoubtedly be others that follow him.
I am between employment right now otherwise there would be one in the post on its way to him/her but I would be open to a small contribution if this could get momentum. Please only leave productive comments.. if its not something you're interested in seeing happen let the thread die a sinking death!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill donate towards a tab, depending on the Dev, but with cm7 almost perfect, and afterbridge doing his thing, is it really needed for another dev, I'd rather one good rom than have 50 crap ones like most the other sections, also this is in the wrong section.
swyped from a galaxy far far away...
natious said:
Ill donate towards a tab, depending on the Dev, but with cm7 almost perfect, and afterbridge doing his thing, is it really needed for another dev, I'd rather one good rom than have 50 crap ones like most the other sections, also this is in the wrong section.
swyped from a galaxy far far away...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. CM7 is now flashable, Overcome is just fantastic and Honeycomb is soon available to everyone. IMHO, I can't see how the development could benefit from another Tab. Unless Overcome gets ported for CDMA users..
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
GANJDROID said:
I agree. CM7 is now flashable, Overcome is just fantastic and Honeycomb is soon available to everyone. IMHO, I can't see how the development could benefit from another Tab. Unless Overcome gets ported for CDMA users..
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe if the dev ported over a miui rom, but even then most people are going to use cm7
I would definitely donate toward P1010 development. Not a whole tab of course, but something nonetheless.
Sent from my GT-P1010 using XDA Premium App
natious said:
Maybe if the dev ported over a miui rom, but even then most people are going to use cm7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's so special about CM7? I know he does work for most phones? Or at least that rom is available for a number of phones. I'm guessing it's good because i've heard people speak so highly of it.
Also would it have any advantage over overcome's rom? And no disrespect to overcome because it's the first custom rom i've ever flashed and is the only reason I kept my tab. Love it.
Guessing i'm just asking if you or someone else could educate me on cm and specifically cm7.
I'm up with this thread, i cannot donate for a Tab but i'll send some beers to Rodd.
All devices get the best from the kernel, with a good one your tab will be always fine, it's not all about a Rom.
Have i t remember when we all got smartass/interactive governors fot our tab?
Now, you can say "i don't use smartass" or" my tab currently has not Ext4 because i don't need it", i say, why wasting your time to come here and say that we don't need another dev?
Just my 2cents of course.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
You can NEVER have too many devs.
natious said:
Maybe if the dev ported over a miui rom, but even then most people are going to use cm7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd sell my body to medical science and give the profit to the dev who would port it.
Well, either MIUI or HTC Sense. Those are the only things I miss from my Desire days.
CM7 is completely AOSP. Basically built from scratch for each major release (CM6 - CM7) then they add bacon Tablet tweeks, different lock screens, theme chooser, custom brightness ssettings and loads of other things.
I don't see it as an amazing rom, more like stock, with goodies. I've never understood why people praise it all day. Its great yeah, but I don't see what's amazing about it. But Cyanogen is the Android custom roms/development forefather. He was one of the first to start it and hasn't stopped.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA Premium App
Id donate up to thirty bones for a Sprint CM7 rom. I'd give any spare cash for that.
How about a dev ports/creates the Trinity 14 kernal for the tab. Now that would be baaaadassss
swyped from a galaxy far far away...
How come all the developers are focusing on the gsm and cdma models. Is there anyway to get a master thread focusing on the p1010 model. I think it is about time for the wifi only model to get roms or at least a overclocking mod. Im pretty sure i checked everywhere so if anyone knows about any GT roms for the wifi models i will greatly appreciate it.
+ 1 in here.
For those student with limited budget. P1010 is a great device for those who arent rich~
Perhaps the real solutions would be a separate subforum for the p1010, so its impossible to ignore?
+1 here.
GALAXY TAB P1010 OWNERS UNITE!
CALLING ALL GALAXY TAB DEVS, PLEASE HELP US OUT, just 1 port from the gt p1000 to take us away from stock nastiness! PLEASE HELP!
Sent from my GT-P1010 using xda premium
You have my sword.
Samsung pretty much abandoned the PT1010. The looming GTab7+ puts another nail in the coffin for this model.
The Devs are our last hope.
even my old htc magic got gingerbread already
+1
Please tell us what you need to start developing. I mean Cyanogen even works for Samsung...
P1010 model employs different hardware, hence different drivers... If someone were to donate a p1010 device to the devs there would be more chance of rom developement however most of the devs have the p1000. This is why there are a heap of p1000 GSM roms,not so many CDMA roms & no real developement of wireless only roms...
Sorry, but the rule is supply and demand - there are a heap of p1000 users and not enough p1010 users. Most devs got a tab right off the bat so the p1010 users have no devs available...
Donate??
ultramag69 said:
If someone were to donate a p1010 device to the devs there would be more chance of rom developement
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By donating, do you mean that I need to physically give it to a dev, or can I allow it to be used for testing while still keeping it with myself.
If it means i need to give it physically, then I need to know if there are any devs around New Delhi, India. I would be willing to buy a new one and lend it, or do the testing myself.
I am not an engineer, but I was able to root my I9000 using Heimdall and install MIUI on the same. I think I will be able to test as well.
Ski3high. said:
How come all the developers are focusing on the gsm and cdma models. Is there anyway to get a master thread focusing on the p1010 model. I think it is about time for the wifi only model to get roms or at least a overclocking mod. Im pretty sure i checked everywhere so if anyone knows about any GT roms for the wifi models i will greatly appreciate it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may be pulling a dead thread but there is someone working on CWM and CM7, then Cm9 I believe, in the development section. Name is motafoca and he already has working CWM and almost finished CM7. There's still one dev who cares about us!
Sent from my GT-P1010 using Tapatalk
Since we now have an official GB build for our LG-P925, i really think this forum should be cleaned up and all the builds that are built from LG-P920 GB Base should be removed. Since they are not actually for our device.
Does anybody agree?
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Please. Get out of the development section.
EDIT: No. I do not agree. It's literally the SAME device. Open one up. Check the "P925" label that's underneath it.
And no. It's not that is:
tampaboy1984 said:
Since they are not actually for our device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's that there are other carriers in this world that exist. Besides AT&T and all.
Now tell me.
Q: If there wasn't the international version or the P920 ROMs were "banished" from our Device section, do you really think I'd still be here?
A: NO. AT&T is worthless. For the fact that they'd like to bloat everything and put restrictions and whatnot.
Conclusion?
Leave it as is.
EDIT 2: End rant. Every developer needs to have one of these. xD
One can only be nice for so long.
Dude dont be a duche. A mod will move when they see fit. And by the way great work on your roms.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
I'd say no. They are compatible with our thrill, its the same phone.
Rogers Canada uses the P925 but calls it by its official LG name, the optimus 3d.
Should the forums be combined?
Probably. If you're willing to modify your phone with a custom ROM then you should be able to change apns and all that good stuff. Why should we keep it seperate thus making it harder for users to find a good ROM?
The average USA user isnt going to search for the optimus 3d forum.
Do you think the optimus 3d mods should get rid of roms that were made from a LG thrill dev?
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
tampaboy1984 said:
Dude dont be a duche. A mod will move when they see fit. And by the way great work on your roms.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not that I'm being a "douche"
It's that you straight up ignored a PINNED thread.
SEE POST
poyensa said:
MOD EDIT: BEFORE POSTING ANY THREAD IN THE DEVELOPMENT SECTION, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING:
If you have developed a ROM, or are working with others to do so, the development forum is somewhere to discuss and share ideas, post useful feedback and logs or crash dumps, and to discuss a common goal developers are trying to achieve.
It is NOT the place to post your question because it gets higher traffic, or because more experienced users frequent it. Doing this just annoys those who are working on the device, and drives them away. Developers don't want to wade through 20 threads of "Help me urgently" to find their threads for porting and fixing camera issues etc. Similarly, if a thread is designated as discussion for developers say, porting a camera fix, please do not post in there asking "When will it be ready?", "Can I flash this yet?" etc. This is both completely disrespectful to those working on the project (you evidently haven't read the important posts in the thread), and also is making it harder for developers to find comments from other developers or testers when required.
Similarly, don't make loads of "Thanks for your work here" posts in an active development thread. It's just as annoying to developers as asking when something will be ready. If a ROM is complete, then go ahead and thank the developer if you wish, but don't go into threads for devs only, and interrupt it to post "thanks". It's basically spamming, and is treated as such.
If you are posting in development, you should have read every sticky and notice there, and should be actively developing or helping in the development of something. Developing isn't installing a ROM, or using a tweak, it's creating a ROM or other hack or tweak. If you haven't read for several days before starting out on XDA, you are likely about to ask something already solved. I registered on XDA when I first wanted to post, and that was to join in a discussion on something. Sure, join up and ask a question, but read the information available in General and Q&A first, as your question will have been asked before. Search is your friend here, become familiar with it.
Regarding when to post in development if you are not actually developing something, there is one occasion where it's acceptable. If you find a leak of a new ROM, which isn't already posted, and you verify it's legitimacy via either running it, or based on the source you obtained it from, then this is assisting in development, and should be posted in development. If you want to ask when a leak will be available use search first, then if not already in discussion, open a thread in general or Q&A.
If you have a problem flashing a ROM, this is NOT related to development. It's up to you to determine if it is specific to a particular ROM, and post useful information in that developer's existing thread for the ROM. If it happens on more than one ROM, and isn't a known issue (remember you should read several times more words than you post), then find out what you are doing wrong. Check guides written by others, try to repeat the problem and see if it happens every time. Something needs to be reproducible to be fixed effectively.
Once you have identified what you need help with go to the device Q&A forum (general if device lacks one), and make a clear, informative thread that explains the issue, and what you have tried doing to fix it. Did you re-download the ROM? Did you ask a friend to flash it for you, to reduce chance of user error? What steps (exactly) did you follow? What errors did you see (exact wording)? Did you double check all the steps? Did you do a wipe or hard reset?
If you make a clear, concise, yet detailed post, you will find help forthcoming, and should get the problem sorted very quickly. If someone suggests you try something, report back on what happened, did it work etc. Then, next time someone has this issue and searches, they will find this and have a verified and tested solution.
So remember... before you start a thread in development, ask yourself what you are developing. If you can't answer, then stop, step away from the post button, and think about where you are posting. Would it be better in General or Q&A, or is some more time with your best friend, search, required?
Regards,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone lock this obnoxious idiots thread, if it weren't for half the O3D Devs, we'd never had a Temporary GB Baseband.
Do a quick favor for me, go back to when you joined XDA and watch the n00b video, I think there's a few things you didn't pay any attention to!
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA
Ok well obviously no one can see the obvious that the 920 based GB roms all pretty much run like crap on our 925. And also the fact that none of the GB based kernels made previous to v20p are not compatible with v20p, why have a forum full of roms that really arent made for our phone and that are borked
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Oh let me point out this is the LG Thrill 4G forum (LG-P925) not (LG-P920)
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
tampaboy1984 said:
Oh let me point out this is the LG Thrill 4G forum (LG-P925) not (LG-P920)
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright. No more BioHazard? Enjoy a ROMless device.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II w/ CM9
And let me point out that the P920 and P925 are pretty much the same phone. Quoted from Engadget's review of the Thrill 4G:
Talk about a spitting image of the LG Optimus 3D. Don't get us wrong, we were expecting the Thrill 4G to be incredibly similar to its global counterpart, of course -- we just didn't believe it would be that close. We expect US carriers to take a handset popular in other parts of the world, tweak its design, change the UI and essentially turn it into a completely different phone. Interestingly enough, we found it difficult to find any significant variations at all between the twins aside from a few minor adjustments.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and
Reviewing the Thrill 4G was essentially a complete rehash of the LG Optimus 3D, with the obvious exception of AT&T branding and price ($100 with a two-year commitment).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or, look at the specs of the P925 and the P920 and tell me what major differences you can find.
The Dark Lestat dont get so upset seriously dude, like your roms were great dont get me wrong. Buuuut, your 2.0 and 2.1 versions honestly were crap, the new v20p completely satisfies my taste and runs way smoother than your 2.xx versions. So by all means leave if you want to. Thanks for your time while you were here though dude. v20p has made this phone is usable until the Samsung Galaxy III comes out. These are just my opinions im not speaking for ghe whole community here The Dark Lestat.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
tampaboy1984 said:
The Dark Lestat dont get so upset seriously dude, like your roms were great dont get me wrong. Buuuut, your 2.0 and 2.1 versions honestly were crap, the new v20p completely satisfies my taste and runs way smoother than your 2.xx versions. So by all means leave if you want to. Thanks for your time while you were here though dude. v20p has made this phone is usable until the Samsung Galaxy III comes out. These are just my opinions im not speaking for ghe whole community here The Dark Lestat.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. I'm not actually leaving. That's essentially what it would be like. NO DEVELOPMENT for the Thrill except for bedwa.
As for 2.0 and 2.1, I posted a fix already.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II w/ CM9
So, you would alienate a superb developer on behalf of the whole P925 community just because v20p satisfies *your* tastes? That's the textbook definition of selfishness.
The Dark Lestat said:
I know. I'm not actually leaving. That's essentially what it would be like. NO DEVELOPMENT for the Thrill except for bedwa.
As for 2.0 and 2.1, I posted a fix already.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II w/ CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Believe it or not. Urabewe is teetering on the idea of coming out with the next edition of doomed roms based on this new official gb. So count him as a dev still...
Posted from my ICS'd Captivate
Trekfan422991 said:
Believe it or not. Urabewe is teetering on the idea of coming out with the next edition of doomed roms based on this new official gb. So count him as a dev still...
Posted from my ICS'd Captivate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's legit. I really hope this place is flooded with devs. I really do.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S II w/ CM9
The v20c base band is the same as the one released in the new gb v20p so essentially its the same except bloatware. I'm on att using v20c with 2.1. And I absolutely don't understand how someone could Complain about. Its flawless, and if not maybe your doing something wrong. I have so many options, overclock, themes ect . With v20c I am finally happy with this phone. Everyone else should be too!
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA
Thanks again lestat!
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA
akwhite23 said:
The v20c base band is the same as the one released in the new gb v20p so essentially its the same except bloatware. I'm on att using v20c with 2.1. And I absolutely don't understand how someone could Complain about. Its flawless, and if not maybe your doing something wrong. I have so many options, overclock, themes ect . With v20c I am finally happy with this phone. Everyone else should be too!
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously you dont know what your talking about because v20c and v20p are totally different. You cant use any existing kernels on v20p, the result is a phone with no cell signal and you cant even open apn settings. Also if no one has noticed yet v20p does have new features, one ive noticed is when you receive a text message at when phone is locked there is a cool text message pop up icon now in the middle of the lock screen that you can press snd slide down to unlock straight to messages, also if you use the built in email app its the same thing, also with a missed call.
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
I agree with akwhite, V20c is the best stock ROM to base off of; v20p is almost the same but loaded with AT&T annoyances such as the name in the notification bar. I just loaded v20p to see how it was, but it's obvious v20c is the way to go. Rogers seems to be alot better at keeping their branding less obtrusive and more removable. V20p and v20c are pretty much the same.
tampaboy1984 said:
Oh let me point out this is the LG Thrill 4G forum (LG-P925) not (LG-P920)
Sent from my LG-P925 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be reminded that Half of BioHazard is built ORIGINALLY off the O3D in general specifically because the very first GB Baseband mostly changes the device name and overruns software in order to put our device on possibly the first US/EU Baseband portable to the Thrill.
Yes! This is the "Thrill" forums and if I'm not correct the O3D was advertised FIRST and the most in Europe, it wasn't til a month later that the device WE call the Thrill wad advertised. Most Optimus models made are mainly for Europe! This making our device a European output device Originally based on P920. I'm beginning to think the reason for the long GB Official wait was because LG wanted to bug out the early released European GB.
Look at the facts of most European devices, half of our Mobile devices are based off them.
You slowly seem like you not even care for BioHazard. The first working GB ROM made mostly for Thrill in order to make a break and give us at least some 4G Speed & Signal.
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA